75.6 F
Chicago
Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Home Blog Page 1048

Bondi DOJ Opposes Missouri’s Second Amendment Preservation Act

0
Bondi DOJ Opposes Missouri’s Second Amendment Preservation Act

Submitted by Aidan Johnston of Gun Owners of America,

The Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi has continued to attack Missouri’s Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA), treating it much the same way the Biden administration did. That decision is striking, because it puts Bondi’s DOJ at odds with both the text of the Constitution and President Trump’s own executive order directing agencies to protect Second Amendment rights.

Missouri’s SAPA, enacted in 2021, was the state’s effort to ensure that its officers and resources would not be used to enforce federal gun control measures that exceed constitutional limits. The law prohibits state officials from enforcing certain federal firearms statutes and penalizes agencies that cooperate with them. At its core, the SAPA reflects a well-established principle: the federal government may not commandeer state officials to carry out federal policy.

The Supreme Court has confirmed that principle repeatedly. In cases involving firearms, immigration, environmental regulations, and even marijuana enforcement, the Court has recognized that Washington cannot force state legislatures or police to implement federal priorities. Missouri applied that same reasoning to firearms, instructing its law enforcement officers to focus on state law rather than federal regulations.

Bondi’s DOJ, however, has treated Missouri’s SAPA as though it were an act of nullification. In court filings, the Department has insisted that Missouri cannot insulate itself from federal gun laws and has sought to strike down the statute entirely. The irony is obvious. In our amicus briefs to defend the Missouri law, GOA has repeatedly pointed out that the SAPA does not prevent federal agents from enforcing federal law. It simply says Missouri’s officers will not be conscripted to help. That is a crucial distinction, and it is one with strong constitutional backing.

The problem is not just the legal position DOJ has taken, but the continuity it represents. President Trump campaigned on restoring Second Amendment rights and ordered his agencies to review and roll back infringements. Yet Bondi’s DOJ is still carrying forward the same arguments the Biden administration made, undermining a state law designed to protect gun rights. It is difficult to reconcile those courtroom filings with the administration’s broader promises.

The implications extend beyond firearms. If DOJ succeeds in invalidating Missouri’s SAPA, the precedent could weaken states’ ability to resist federal overreach in other contexts. It would signal that Washington can not only impose its own rules but also force states to spend their resources enforcing them. That undermines both the Second Amendment and the Tenth Amendment.

For Missouri gun owners, the stakes are high. The SAPA was intended to ensure that local police would not be drawn into federal prosecutions targeting law-abiding citizens. Without it, Missourians risk seeing their own state and local agencies used to advance federal policies that many in the state reject as unconstitutional.

Pam Bondi’s DOJ has a choice. Nothing compels the Department to continue down the path set by its predecessors. By pressing forward with the Biden administration’s litigation strategy, it is not defending federal supremacy—it is eroding the balance of federalism that protects both state autonomy and individual rights.

Missouri’s law is a legitimate assertion of state authority in a constitutional system that depends on checks and balances. DOJ’s decision to attack it reflexively, rather than respecting the boundaries Congress and the Constitution established, sends the wrong message—to states, to courts, and to the millions of Americans who believed this administration would be different.

If the Trump administration is to fulfill its pledge of being the most pro–Second Amendment in history, that requires more than speeches. It requires ensuring that the Department of Justice under Pam Bondi does not undercut states when they act to safeguard constitutional rights. On Missouri’s SAPA, that responsibility has not yet been met.

*  *  *

ATTENTION: Buy some meat before free shipping goes away Sunday night… Several items already sold out.

Just the Steaks (10 lbs)

Filet Mignon and other goodies (11 lbs)

Ground Beef (10 lbs, on sale in addition to free shipping)

Texas Lasagna & Meatballs (clean comfort food… holy crap it’s good)

Beef, Chick & Pork Trio

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 19:50

MSM Says It Knows What Hegseth’s Mystery Meeting Of Hundreds Of Generals Is All About

0
MSM Says It Knows What Hegseth’s Mystery Meeting Of Hundreds Of Generals Is All About

The Washington Post and CNN say they know what Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth’s big summoning of hundreds of military generals and admirals is all about. The meeting is set for Tuesday at Quantico Marine Base near Washington D.C. 

No official explanation has yet to be given for why some 800 top commanders are being gathered – some traveling from bases across the globe. Speculation has abounded, including whether it could relate to going to war with Russia, or some other dire and alarming change in force posture. Major media outlets in the US are now claiming it will merely be a big talk by Hegseth in maintaining “warrior ethos” and things like professional standards. It’s also being reported as one big “rally the troops” meeting.

via DoD

Apparently this somewhat unprecedented gathering is due to his “mounting impatience that the Pentagon hasn’t readily adopted the Trump administration’s directives on military culture, according to officials briefed on the plan.”

The speech will aim to get everyone on the same page in terms of Trump’s desire to tighten up discipline and professional standards across military ranks. So far, President Trump has only said when asked about the somewhat unprecedented meeting by reporters, “It’s great when generals and top people want to come to the United States to be with a now-called secretary of war.”

The Washington Post states:

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered hundreds of generals to travel from around the world to hear him make a short speech on military standards and the “warrior ethos,” multiple people familiar with the event told The Washington Post.

Commenting on the swift pushback, it continues:

Some Pentagon officials questioned the wisdom of launching a relatively large gathering on short notice to hear Hegseth speak for a matter of minutes, and bristled at the idea that long-serving military leaders — a segment of whom spent years in combat earlier in their careers — needed instruction on how to fight.

“They don’t need a talk from Secretary Hegseth on the warrior ethos,” a defense official said.

A high profile retired general has spoken up on social media, and Hegseth bat it down…

There have in the last months been some firings and reshufflings of top command posts by Hegseth, who dismissed Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse, Navy Reserve Chief Vice Adm. Nancy Lacore, and Naval Special Warfare Command head Rear Adm. Milton Sands.

“Critics have argued that his policies have often not seemed aligned with lethality — core initiatives have included removing transgender service members, ordering new shaving standards military-wide and rebranding the Defense Department as ‘the Department of War,’ complete with new seals and signage marking the entrance to his offices at the Pentagon,” WaPo continues.

One such critic, Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (Ret.), former commander of US Army Europe, wrote as follows:

In my forty years in uniform, I never saw anything like it. While senior leaders have been recalled to Washington to meet with the secretary of defense during all our wars, never once did a secretary summon all of the hundreds of one- to four-stars from each of the services, plus their top enlisted counterparts, from every corner of the globe to a single auditorium. Not during the Cold War, not during Desert Storm, not during the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not Rumsfeld, not Gates, not Panetta, not Mattis, not Austin.

They likely didn’t do it because it is disruptive. It is expensive. And it is unnecessary.

The optics of the meeting will be interesting, and Hegseth plans to record and later make public his speech. There still remains the possibility that WaPo and CNN’s reporting on it being about “warrior ethos” is flat wrong. But things will soon become clear in a matter of days.

*  *  *

ATTENTION: Buy some meat before free shipping goes away Sunday night… Several items already sold out.

Just the Steaks (10 lbs)

Filet Mignon and other goodies (11 lbs)

Ground Beef (10 lbs, on sale in addition to free shipping)

Texas Lasagna & Meatballs (clean comfort food… holy crap it’s good)

Beef, Chick & Pork Trio

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 19:15

Why Experts Are Exploring Ketogenic Therapy For Mental Health

0
Why Experts Are Exploring Ketogenic Therapy For Mental Health

Authored by Jennifer Sweenie via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Research suggests that metabolic health may play an essential role in mental well-being.

After years of therapies, medications, retreats, and self-exploration, Michael, a former nutrition client of mine, had resigned himself to a familiar low-grade depression and anxiety he’d carried since childhood. He accepted it as part of who he was. However, following Michael’s debilitating autoimmune diagnosis, a friend mentioned that changing her own diet had put her condition into remission. In physical pain on top of his depression, Michael decided to try an elimination diet.

Michael made several key changes to his eating—he cut out processed foods, refined carbs, and sugar, while adding healthy fats, increasing protein, and focusing on whole foods, including vegetables and fruit.

His physical health improved within a few months—and most strikingly, his depression lifted in just one month.

I felt like life had come back into me. My mind was clear and my apathy gone. I never thought I would feel this happy again.”

For decades, psychiatry has focused on chemical imbalances in the brain. Now, growing research suggests that overall metabolic health—how efficiently the body produces and uses energy—may play an equally important role in mental well-being. That’s why scientists are now exploring therapeutic ketosis, a medically supervised ketogenic diet, as a potential tool for conditions ranging from depression to bipolar disorder.

This promising approach also sheds light on how everyday food choices can influence both metabolic health and mental well-being, raising a timely question: How can we eat to best support our minds and moods?

The Science of Metabolic Psychiatry

Metabolic psychiatry is an emerging field that examines how diet and inflammation affect brain energy metabolism, which in turn affects mood. The brain primarily runs on glucose, but it can also use ketones as an alternative fuel when glucose is low.

Most of the important mechanisms are not about neurotransmitters at all. It’s about ketones bypassing brain insulin resistance and improving mitochondrial health,” Dr. Matthew Bernstein, a board-certified psychiatrist and leading voice in metabolic psychiatry, told The Epoch Times.

About one-third of people with serious mental illnesses meet the criteria for metabolic syndrome, according to the results of one cross-sectional study, highlighting the overlap between physical and mental conditions.

The overlap has prompted research into the underlying mechanisms. Emerging evidence suggests that when cells lack sufficient energy or oxygen, their mitochondria can malfunction, leading to brain inflammation and potentially affecting mental function.

A preclinical study published in Cell in April found that inflammatory molecules can influence anxiety by acting on specific brain cells. A 2025 review published in Healthcare the same month suggests neuroinflammation may link psychiatric and systemic disease, though more studies are needed to clarify causality.

Metabolic Psychiatry in Practice

The research suggests that metabolism is the common thread linking psychiatric illness, brain energy regulation, and inflammation. Early findings are promising and point to a future where psychiatry addresses the full metabolic context of the brain.

This is moving really fast. Metabolic psychiatry has a good group of people behind it from many disciplines, and therefore, we are pushing ahead with the randomized controlled trials,” Erin Louise Bellamy, a metabolic psychiatry clinician and researcher, and expert in ketogenic therapy for depression, told The Epoch Times.

A clinical trial published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry found that improving insulin sensitivity alone reduced depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression. The researchers used metformin to improve insulin resistance, suggesting that targeting metabolic dysfunction may help improve mood.

Given metabolism’s role in brain function, ketogenic therapy is being explored as a potential tool. A pilot study published in Translational Psychiatry in September found that in college students with major depressive disorder and already receiving treatment, following a well‑formulated ketogenic diet for 10 to 12 weeks was associated with approximately 70 percent reductions in depression symptoms and improvements in cognition and well‑being.

A review published in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, involving nearly 2,000 people, concluded that ketogenic diets appear safe, feasible, and effective in targeting inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation.

Understanding the metabolic influences on the brain sets the stage for exploring dietary interventions that support mental health.

Therapeutic Ketosis

Therapeutic ketosis is a medically supervised ketogenic intervention that shifts the brain from relying on glucose to using ketones, produced when fat is broken down in the absence of carbohydrates. First developed nearly a century ago to treat drug-resistant epilepsy, it is now being explored for mood and psychiatric disorders.

The overarching theory of therapeutic ketosis is that it improves metabolism by reducing inflammation, stabilizing blood sugar, and countering insulin resistance, while improving mitochondrial health—the “batteries” that make us tick and work.

We are fixing that [mitochondria], or at least giving it some time out away from all the blood sugar spikes, to get healthy again,” Bellamy said.

Unlike popular keto diets marketed for weight loss and convenience foods, therapeutic ketosis uses precise macronutrient ratios, monitors ketone levels, and requires medical supervision. A neurologist works with a registered dietitian to prescribe a diet to a patient.

“It will be carefully calculated to change their metabolic physiology,” Dominic D’Agostino, associate professor of molecular pharmacology and physiology at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, told The Epoch Times.

Bellamy noted that fat-to-carb-plus-protein ratios can be adjusted individually, often being roughly two parts fat to one part carbs, plus protein.

A day’s diet following such a ratio might include eggs with bacon cooked in cream and butter for breakfast, a leafy green salad with chicken, avocado, and plenty of olive oil for lunch, salmon with roasted asparagus, drizzled with butter and olive oil for dinner, and a small handful of macadamia nuts or a piece of full-fat cheese if needed to maintain the ratio.

The popular keto diet carries a lot of baggage—meaning it’s often overhyped and sensationalized. People tend to focus on extreme versions, packaged treats, celebrity anecdotes, or short-term results, which can give the wrong impression of how therapeutic keto actually works, D’Agostino said.

Though research is still early, evidence suggests therapeutic ketogenic interventions may improve symptoms in depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. Bellamy added that ketosis targets six or seven different pathways, with each person having one or two working at any one time. As a result, ketosis can benefit many people, but the mechanisms and response can vary.

If you elevate circulating ketones, they rapidly cross the blood-brain barrier and restore normal cerebral metabolic activity,” noted D’Agostino.

A ketogenic diet often works like a form of calorie restriction because it’s less palatable and naturally helps you feel full, so you don’t overeat like on a standard American diet, he said.

Ketones directly calm inflammatory pathways linked to psychiatric disorders. In the brain, they provide an alternative energy source when glucose is low and boost GABA, a calming neurotransmitter, acting somewhat like a mild anti-anxiety medication.

Gut inflammation may also play a role in the mechanisms of therapeutic keto.

“There’s just not enough hard science about exactly which microbes we want and which we don’t, and which are helpful and which are not. We’re still at the infancy of learning all of that, but definitely reducing gut inflammation.” Bernstein added.

As to the long-term benefits of therapeutic ketosis, “Some people retain benefits after coming off the diet. We think it has the potential to create a healing process in the brain. If someone’s been on a ketogenic diet for a few years and they come out of ketosis, I don’t expect all their symptoms to come back immediately, he said.

You Don’t Have to Enter Ketosis

For severe mental illnesses such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depression, or obsessive-compulsive disorder, medical supervision and ketosis may be needed to see significant benefits. In contrast, moderate depression, anxiety, or attentional issues may respond to less strict low-carb strategies, Bernstein said.

Diets high in refined carbs and added sugars are linked to higher rates of depression and anxiety, while diets rich in whole foods may help reduce depressive symptoms. Removing ultra-processed foods gives the body a more even playing field to improve metabolic health, Bellamy said.

She recommends returning to foods our grandparents would recognize to help stabilize blood sugar, including prioritizing animal protein, cooking with butter or coconut oil, a variety of vegetables, especially leafy greens, and choosing fattier cuts of meat.

A common question Bernstein grapples with in clinical practice is whether people can see mental health benefits from lowering inflammation through diet—cutting processed foods or eating low-carb—without committing to full therapeutic ketosis. He suggested easing in by reducing ultra-processed foods,  added sugar, refined flour, and industrial refined oils, while emphasizing whole foods and vegetables. Then, consider a lower-carb or low-glycemic diet next. Habits such as regular exercise, quality sleep, circadian rhythm alignment, and mind-body practices can further support many of the same metabolic processes targeted by a ketogenic diet.

Bernstein suggested a mindset shift around eating fat: “Initially it’s about not fearing fat … That’s a whole psychological shift people need to make. There really is no good evidence that saturated fat is bad for us.”

Small interventions, such as time-restricted eating or adding MCT oil in the morning, can also help, he said.

Even a simple low-carb diet—around 100 grams of fibrous carbs from vegetables and fruits while avoiding processed grains—can deliver many of keto’s benefits, D’Agostino said.

Michael’s elimination diet was one example—he cut carbs drastically but didn’t enter ketosis, removed inflammatory foods, and increased healthy fats like coconut oil, duck fat, and tallow.

“You, as an individual, have the ability to choose how you eat and the nutrition you have day to day… all of that is within your grasp right now, and you don’t have to wait,” Bellamy said.

Always check in with your physician before making major dietary changes—including trying a ketogenic diet—especially if you take medication to manage a mental health condition.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 18:40

Bragg Drops Charges Against Woman Who Attacked Pro-Life Advocate

0
Bragg Drops Charges Against Woman Who Attacked Pro-Life Advocate

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

For years, many of us have raised concerns over the political weaponization of the New York legal system from the civil fraud case against the Trump company by New York Attorney General Letitia James to the criminal prosecution by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. The popularity of these lawfare warriors shows how a dual legal system has taken hold in the city. That was never more evident than in the outrageous decision of Bragg to drop the case against Brianna J. Rivers, 30, who assaulted a pro-life advocate in a case of political violence. The refusal to prosecute Rivers is only the latest example of enabling those who turn to violence in our political system.

Rivers was captured on videotape attacking Craven Antao after she asked Rivers questions about abortion and repeated her answers.

New York police arrested Rivers in April on one count of second-degree assault. Prosecutors had this videotape that showed no provocation or excuse for the violent attack.  Antao had to go to emergency room for stitches and pay $3,000 in medical bills.

Nevertheless, Bragg’s office first downgraded the charge from second-degree assault to a misdemeanor and has now dropped the case entirely. He is just going to let Rivers walk after an act of political violence captured on film.

According to reports, Braggs’ office missed a critical deadline to turn over evidence. However, this came after the office downgraded the case and then threw up its hands after missing the deadline. It is either a case of intentional scuttling or a lack of priority given an allegation of political violence. The most that Braggs’ office can claim is that it is incompetent.

Bragg’s office could not focus on bringing even a misdemeanor case to show that political violence is unacceptable, even from those on the left.

If this were a pro-life advocate attacking a pro-choice person in New York, it is hard to imagine Bragg slow-walking the prosecution, downgrading the charges, and then dismissing the case after missing a deadline. There would have been an outcry from the public for deterrence and prosecution.

We have also seen the wholesale dropping of charges against rioters in major cities despite massive levels of property damage.

Compare the handling of lawyers in New York City who threw Molotov cocktails at police with a recent case in California. The attorneys (Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman) were given generous plea deals by the Southern District of New York with only 15 months in jail. The judge even praised one of the lawyers for her commitment to public interest. There were no state charges.

This week, a ‘scholar-activist” received almost 20 years in prison and a nearly $100,000 in fines for firebombing a University of California Berkeley police car and other acts of arson. Casey Goonan also claimed political motivations in supporting Palestine in the attacks.

Even given the more extensive record of violence of Goonan, the light punishment given to the New York lawyers was shocking to many of us. Admittedly, that was not a state case, but rather a federal case under the Biden Administration. However, it reinforced the uncertainty as to punishment for serious crimes in New York. There was no apparent move by the district attorney to bring state charges or to push for more serious penalties from their federal counterparts.

At a time of increased political violence, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Bragg’s decision sends a chilling message to the most extreme elements in our political system.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 17:30

Goldman Identifies “Vulnerable Link” At Center Of Energy Security 

0
Goldman Identifies “Vulnerable Link” At Center Of Energy Security 

America’s core energy security policy is no longer just focused on crude oil tankers, LNG cargoes, or even shale output. The new chokepoint is the power grid – nearly half a century old, with limited spare capacity, and now, according to Goldman analysts, at the very center of energy security. As they put it: “The grid is a vulnerable link in energy security.” 

The need to invest in the power grid – a vulnerable link in the energy supply chain – and the associated metals demand boost are becoming more acute with the rise of AI, geopolitical tensions, and the shift to hybrid warfare,” analysts Lina Thomas and Daan Struyven wrote in a note to clients on Thursday titled “AI and Defense Place Grids at the Center of Energy Security.”

Thomas and Struyven stress that Western power grids are averaging 50 years in Europe and 40 years in North America, and are near the end of their operating life

In the US, power demand growth has already started to strain regional markets. More specifically, the PJM power market in Virginia – the data center capital of the world – hit significant transmission bottlenecks in 2022, and nine out of 13 US regional power markets have already reached critical tightness this summer, while we expect all but one to reach critical tightness by 2030,” the analysts noted.

Meanwhile, the US and Europe paralyzed their economies and power capacity under the guise of a “climate crisis,” where globalist-aligned Democrats forced green policies that swapped stable fossil-fuel generation with unreliable solar and wind (unleashed a power bill crisis). At the same time, China added massive amounts of coal and nuclear power. It appears as if Western globalists deliberately neutered the West to enable China’s rise.

The analysts argue that power grids are the most “critical link” for AI and defense, with all three intertwined, making the grid a national security priority.

The need to invest in the power grid – a vulnerable link in the energy supply chain – and the associated metals demand boost are becoming more acute with the rise of AI, geopolitical tensions, and the shift to hybrid warfare. This is because the grid is a critical link for AI and defense, with all three being interdependent,” Thomas and Struyven noted. 

AI in the defense world is just beginning…

Data centers draw massive amounts of power. 

On the commodity side, the analysts pointed out that with AI and defense putting the power grid at the center of energy security, the urgent need for grid upgrades is turning copper into the new oil.

Such grid upgrades are metals-intensive: we expect grid and power infrastructure to drive ~60% of global copper demand growth through the end of the decade, adding the equivalent of another US to global demand and underpinning our bullish copper price forecast of $10,750/t by 2027,” they said. 

Related and happening this week:

By the 2030s, you may also see this:

The full Goldman note is available to ZeroHedge Pro Subs in the usual place. This note includes additional charts and in-depth view on how the power grid has become the “vulnerable link in energy security.”

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 16:55

New Quantum Breakthrough Could Lead To Super-Efficient Electronics

0
New Quantum Breakthrough Could Lead To Super-Efficient Electronics

Authored by Haley Zaremba via OilPrice.com,

  • Scientists are leveraging quantum physics to develop new energy production methods, aiming to address the computing industry’s growing energy demands.

  • Researchers at MIT have devised a novel approach to observe the quantum Hall effect by mimicking it with superchilled sodium atoms, enabling deeper study of frictionless electron flow.

  • This breakthrough in understanding “edge-state” physics could lead to highly efficient electronic circuits and quantum computers, offering a solution for energy loss in data and energy transfer.

Scientists are getting closer and closer to unlocking the intricate dance of quantum physics to revolutionize the way we produce energy. As the computing industry threatens to run out of energy on the back of the artificial intelligence boom, scientists are racing to bring quantum computing into reality as a means of solving critical energy security dilemmas while also turning computing technology on its head.

We know that the potential of quantum physics and quantum computing is massive within the energy sector, but there is still a lot that we don’t understand about the science behind it. Observing the quantum world is exceedingly difficult because the behaviors and reactions involved are happening at such a tiny scale, and so lightning fast, that the processes are all but invisible to humans.

But scientists are getting better at overcoming this challenge. At MIT, researchers have developed an ingenious way of scaling up a recreation of the quantum Hall effect to more effectively observe a phenomenon that usually occurs at a scale too small and too fast to study. Instead of observing electrons, the MIT team has found a way to superchill sodium atoms and control their spatial arrangement with lasers in a way that allows them to mimic the phenomenon of interest – a so-called “edge state.”

Normally, electrons move freely in all directions, scattering randomly when they encounter an obstacle due to friction. However, in certain contexts and with certain exotic materials, they behave differently, flowing together and in one direction along the material’s edge. This is known as the quantum Hall effect. And now, MIT scientists have found a way to meaningfully study this effect so that we can one day harness “edge-state” physics to revolutionize computing with virtually limitless energy

“In this rare ‘edge state,’ electrons can flow without friction, gliding effortlessly around obstacles as they stick to their perimeter-focused flow,” explains an MIT news article. “Unlike in a superconductor, where all electrons in a material flow without resistance, the current carried by edge modes occurs only at a material’s boundary.”

This lack of resistance means a lack of energy loss, which could have enormous and disruptive implications for virtually any sector that uses modern technology. According to reporting from Interesting Engineering, ”such frictionless movement of electrons can enable data and energy transfer across devices without any transmission losses, leading to the development of super-efficient electronic circuits and quantum computers.”

Quantum computing has garnered increasing attention for its potential to fundamentally change computational processes in ways that could increase efficiency and thereby drastically reduce the tech sector’s energy needs. In certain applications, quantum computers could be up to 100 times more energy efficient than current supercomputers. This could have enormous implications for AI and its ballooning energy footprint, as quantum computing could be especially well-suited to AI processing.

While normal computation is binary, with 1s and 0s serving as on- and off-switches, quantum computing operates via qubits, which can be both on and off simultaneously, like a coin spinning in the air before it lands as heads or tails. This simultaneous one-and-off state is called superposition, and it could completely change the fundamentals of computing.

Quantum computing and the field of quantum physics more broadly still have a very long way to go before they enter any kind of commercial domain. But our understanding of these phenomena – and their potential applications in the energy and tech sectors – are rapidly advancing. The recent breakthrough at MIT, by providing a reliable and more observable stand-in for quantum processes, could catalyze quantum experimenting, bringing us one major step closer to an infinite-energy future. 

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 16:20

Russia Is Not Targeting EU Or NATO States, Lavrov Tells UN

0
Russia Is Not Targeting EU Or NATO States, Lavrov Tells UN

Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov addressed the United Nations General Assembly in a wide-ranging speech on Saturday, wherein he warned of a “decisive response” to any “aggression” directed towards Moscow.

But he spent much of the speech debunking the notion that Russia is seeking to attack European Union or NATO states, days after Denmark claimed to be under assault by Russian-linked drone sabotage operations which have at times shut down major airport hubs.

“Threats of force against Russia, accused of practically planning an attack on the North Atlantic Alliance [Nato] and the European Union, are becoming increasingly common,” he said. “President Putin has repeatedly debunked such provocations.”

“Russia has never had and does not have such intentions, but any aggression against my country will be met with a decisive response,” Lavrov emphasized.

Via Sputnik 

But, he asserted, threats against Russia by the Western allies are becoming “increasingly common”. Much of his verbal attack was focused on the more hawkish European countries.

This was in contrast with this more positive tone regarding the Trump administration: “In the approaches of the current US administration, we see a desire not only to contribute to ways to realistically resolve the Ukrainian crisis, but also a desire to develop pragmatic cooperation without adopting an ideological stance,” he said.

To be expected, he saved his harshest attack for the Ukrainian government itself, at one point highlighting its persecution of Russian language and culture in the public sphere. Lavrov noted that even Arabic is not banned by Israel.

Yet Russian is banned in Ukraine. I would remind you that Article 1 of the UN Charter calls for ‘respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion,’” he highlighted.

“The Kiev regime, which seized power in the unconstitutional coup organized by the West in 2014, has set a course to eliminate the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, to legislate the eradication of the Russian language across all spheres – education, culture, and the media. Ukraine is the only country in the world to legally ban the native language of nearly half of its population,” the top Russian diplomat said.

He declared that that Europe is “obsessed with the utopian goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia” and so remains silent on these severe human rights abuses.

“For this goal, the Ukrainian regime is permitted everything – including terrorist attacks against politicians and journalists, torture and extrajudicial executions, indiscriminate bombardment of civilian infrastructure, and reckless sabotage targeting nuclear power plants,” he underscored.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 15:45

This Is The Worst (But Funniest) Book Excerpt You’ll Ever Read

0
This Is The Worst (But Funniest) Book Excerpt You’ll Ever Read

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Kamala Harris Is hawking a book desperately attempting to blame everyone and anyone other than herself for her Presidential campaign being monumentally and historically awful.

Given how much of a low IQ individual she is you’d have thought she would’ve gotten someone else to write it for her, but judging by a newly released excerpt it appears she went at it alone armed only with a pen and a whole case of red wine.

In this sneak peak (which is real this time Kamala describes how she felt when sleepy dementia Joe Biden decided to wear a MAGA hat in front of the media.

“Joe was sharing a joke with some guys in MAGA hats. One of them took his hat off and offered it to Joe… He took it, [I thought] ‘don’t put it on.’ He put it on. Cameras clicked.”

“Within hours, the picture was all over. Joe Biden in a MAGA hat, with the caption, ‘Biden endorses Trump over Harris.’”

She refers to the incident as “the MAGA hat debacle,” and frames it as part of broader frustrations with Biden’s lack of support.

Please let the entire book be like this.

Of course there will be word salads, but at its core…

How will she describe the time Biden called all Trump supporters ‘garbage’?

Let’s take a wild stab…

“Don’t slander half of America [I thought] Then he said all Trump supporters were garbage. Within hours the video was all over with the caption ‘Biden calls Trump supporters ‘garbage.’”

Something like that, right.

Will Biden’s handlers strike back as previously promised?

Another excerpt concerning her refusal to appear on the Joe Rogan podcast was also recently released. 

It consists of a lot of words to just say ‘I wasn’t intellectually up to it and would’ve looked bad.’

Which is funny, because that’s exactly how Rogan described her at the time.

Her team knew it too, and that’s why they demanded editorial control and to limit the exchange to just 45 minutes. 

The book is called 107 Days, because that’s how long everyone had to endure her excruciating cackling before Trump won a massive landslide victory. 

 

It’s also the same amount of time that she managed to burn through one and a half billion dollars.

The title of the book is a suggestion that she didn’t have long enough to put together a winning strategy. But given she never even coherently explained one policy, one can only assume it would take her years.

What else do you think will be in her book? Will she finally answer the question ‘how are you different from Joe Biden?’

President Trump has saved taxpayers tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, by ending Secret Service protection for harris as she promotes the book.

Harris has managed to become even more unpopular since her massive loss with her net favorability rating dropping from -5 points in October 2024 to its current -13 points on a nationwide scale.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 15:10

Trump Authorizes ‘Full Force’ In Portland As Bondi Deploys Anti-Antifa Nationwide

0
Trump Authorizes ‘Full Force’ In Portland As Bondi Deploys Anti-Antifa Nationwide

The Trump administration has responded to recent attacks on US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by directing AG Pam Bondi to deploy DOJ agents to ICE facilities and “wherever” federal immigration officers are “under siege.”

This includes ordering Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to send US troops to Portland to ‘protect the city’ and ICE facilities from antifa and other “domestic terrorists.” 

The move follows Trump signing an executive order last week to formally designate antifa a domestic terrorist organization – which gives the US government a broad mandate to probe the anti-fascist movement’s operations, along with instances where an antifa member “provided material support.”

Bondi took to X to explain what’s going on; 

“I have witnessed the continued onslaught of violence perpetrated against ICE officers across our country. The Department of Justice will not stand idly by in the face of such lawlessness,” Bondi wrote. “At my direction, I am deploying DOJ agents to ICE facilities—and wherever ICE comes under siege—to safeguard federal agents, protect federal property, and immediately arrest all individuals engaged in any federal crime.” 

She continued:

Pursuant to President Trump’s recent executive action, I am also instructing the Joint Terrorism Task Forces across the country to disrupt and investigate all entities and individuals engaged in acts of domestic terrorism, including the repeated acts of violence and obstruction against federal agents. The Department of Justice will seek the most serious available charges against all participants in these criminal mobs, including conspiracy offenses, assault offenses, civil disorder offenses, and terrorism offenses. While these never-ending attacks are designed to break our will, they only strengthen our resolve to complete the work begun. To that end, I have directed the FBI, DEA, ATF, and USMS to accelerate our efforts alongside the Department of Homeland Security to locate, apprehend, detain, prosecute, and remove all illegal aliens present in our country. The rule of law will prevail.

Bondi’s post comes just days after a sniper attack at a Dallas ICE facility that killed two migrants and critically injured another.

Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, Bondi’s post, noting that “Assets mobilizing. This campaign of terrorism will be brought down.”

The latest attacks mark a continuation of political violence fueled by far-left activist groups – some funded by dark-money NGOs.

Some of these orgs are carrying out attacks on ICE agents and facilities nationwide

Portland

Trump, meanwhile, announced on Saturday that he’s sending US troops to Portland to “protect” the city and ICE facilities

“At the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary,” Trump added.

Leftist groups notably declared “war against ICE” last week… 

For some background on what the Trump administration is doing about leftist, NGO-funded violence;

In short, the administration has shifted from a defensive posture to the beginning innings of an offensive campaign against these NGOs, signaling that accountability and enforcement within the nonprofit sector are now viewed as mission-critical.

But of course, declaring war on armed radical leftists is likely to provoke an escalation in civil terrorism attacks from the left.

The decision to nuke USAID earlier this year marked a starting point (the now-defunded agency was funneling money to radical groups under Biden); the next phase will target the donor class that funds this chaos.

Related:

Over the years we’ve all witnessed these organized ‘resist’ protests which spiral out of control, however the Trump administration needs to be careful – even though the left is clearly the violent party in America.

While the Biden administration and their network of deep state judges aggressively targeted anyone who even thought about approaching the Capitol on Jan. 6, or parents who resisted degenerate indoctrination in schools, or the entire first Trump administration, we can only imagine what the next Democrat president (God forbid) will use this as license for when it’s suddenly OK to send forces to deal with ‘domestic terrorists’ – which will of course be whoever they say they are. It won’t matter that the left – as we know, is committing the actual ‘terrorism’ when they routinely use the FBI to entrap the right & their media tentacles to sell it. Oh you like gun shows? (knock knock, KICK, bang)

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 14:35

FBI Director Dismisses Politicization Accusations Following Comey Indictment

0
FBI Director Dismisses Politicization Accusations Following Comey Indictment

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

FBI Director Kash Patel has dismissed claims that the bureau has become more politicized under his watch in the wake of former Director James Comey’s indictment on Thursday.

In a post early on Friday, Patel defended the FBI’s efforts in the investigation targeting Comey and said that the media, in part, was to blame.

“Career FBI agents, intel analysts, and staff led the investigation into Comey and others. They called the balls and strikes and will continue to do so,” he wrote in a statement on X.

“The wildly false accusations attacking this FBI for the politicization of law enforcement comes from the same bankrupt media that sold the world on Russia Gate—it’s hypocrisy on steroids.”

Russiagate refers to claims that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election to aid President Donald Trump, which he has categorically denied. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence in July said that the Obama administration “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to target Trump, although a special counsel investigation led by former FBI head Robert Mueller in 2019 concluded Russia did interfere in the election.

“Their baseless objections tell us now, more than ever, that we are precisely over the target and will remain on mission until completion,” Patel also wrote.

Comey was indicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on Thursday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office announced. Grand jurors rejected one of the counts that was brought against Comey, but ultimately returned an indictment against the former FBI director.

He’s charged with making a false statement and obstruction relating to testimony he gave before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2020. He could face up to five years in prison if convicted, said the Department of Justice (DOJ).

“The charges as alleged in this case represent a breach of the public trust at an extraordinary level,” U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan said in a statement.

“The balance of power is a bedrock principle of our democracy, and it relies upon accountability and a forthright presentation of facts from executive leadership to congressional oversight.

“Any intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance is a violation of professional responsibility and, most importantly, the law.”

In a statement responding to the indictment, Comey denied the allegations that were brought against him.

“My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system. And I’m innocent. So let’s have a trial,” he said in a video statement on Thursday, characterizing the indictment as retaliation for “standing up to” Trump.

The indictment against Comey said that the former FBI director “falsely” stated to a senator that he had not “authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports. It added that the ”statement was false“ because Comey knew that ”he in fact had authorized” that individual to become an anonymous source in thouse reports, according to the indictment that was filed on Thursday.

The indictment has triggered criticism from congressional Democrats.

“Today, after firing his own choice for U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia, Donald Trump finally got a subservient new replacement to carry out his revenge prosecution against former FBI Director James Comey by bringing baseless criminal charges against him,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump hailed the DOJ’s decision. The president said that he believes Comey was fully aware of the allegedly false statement made to the Senate.

“He knew exactly what he was saying, and that it was a very serious and far reaching lie for which a very big price must be paid,” the president wrote.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 14:00