72.8 F
Chicago
Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Home Blog Page 1057

White House Orders Agencies To Prepare Mass Layoff Plans In Event Of Shutdown

0
White House Orders Agencies To Prepare Mass Layoff Plans In Event Of Shutdown

The White House budget office has instructed federal agencies to prepare to fire a ton of people (aka ‘reduction-in-force’ plans) that could permanently eliminate jobs in the event of a government shutdown – the latest twist in the latest shutdown groundhog day – effectively challenging Democrats to a game of chicken. 

Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought

In a memo shared with agencies Wednesday, the Office of Management and Budget said departments must identify programs where discretionary funding will lapse on Oct. 1 and no alternative source is available. Instead of a typical furlough, OMB has told agencies to get ready for permanent reductions – starting with positions that are out of alignment with President Donald Trump’s priorities.

In the past, affected employees were furloughed on a temporary basis and reinstated once Congress approved new spending. Not this time – as OMB Director Russ Vought is using the prospect of deep cuts as leverage against the Democrats.

“Programs that did not benefit from an infusion of mandatory appropriations will bear the brunt of a shutdown,” reads the OMB memo – with agencies instructed to submit their proposed RIF plans and to issue notices to employees who might otherwise be excepted or furloughed during a lapse in funding, Politico reports.

Core services – including Social Security, Medicare, veterans benefits, military operations, law enforcement, immigration enforcement and air traffic control – would continue regardless of a shutdown, according to an OMB official familiar with the guidance.

At the heart of the deadlock, Democrats are demanding that any short-term spending measure include an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies that are due to expire, as well as broader negotiations on domestic priorities. Republicans, by contrast, are pushing to advance a leaner stopgap bill already passed by the House that would fund the government through Nov. 21 while largely preserving Trump administration priorities and holding the line on additional healthcare spending.

The memo arrives days before the Sept. 30 deadline to avert a lapse in government funding. The House has passed a short-term measure to keep operations running through Nov. 21, but Senate Democrats have rejected the plan, insisting on negotiations over a broader bipartisan package that could extend expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies.

The OMB also said that if Congress passes a clean stopgap bill before the fiscal year deadline, nobody will get fired (aside from the usual firings). 

Democrats, of course, are absolutely beside themselves – with Senate Minority Leader Chuck ‘hamburger expert’ Schumer (D-NY) claiming that the plan confirmed his warnings during the last shutdown standoff in March, when he argued that it would enable the Trump administration to accelerate cuts to government programs. Schumer, who will keep his job no matter what, called the OMB memo “an attempt at intimidation.” 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries struck a sharper tone, warning voters in Virginia – home to many federal employees – that the administration’s policies were “ruining lives and punishing hardworking families already struggling with Trump Tariffs and inflation.”

With just days left before government funding runs out, the OMB memo underscores the potential for this shutdown fight to reshape the federal workforce in ways not seen in previous budget battles.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 06:55

Refugees In Holland Can Obtain Social Housing Within 14 Weeks; Locals Wait Up To 12 Years

0
Refugees In Holland Can Obtain Social Housing Within 14 Weeks; Locals Wait Up To 12 Years

Via Remix News,

The Netherlands is the second most densely populated country in Europe, and with surging mass immigration, has been experiencing a raging housing crisis for years.

However, despite this crisis, refugees can gain access to social housing in a mere 14 weeks, while the average Dutch citizen must wait up until 12 years. Now, efforts are being made to right this injustice for Dutch citizens with a new bill, but Council of State, the country’s highest legal advisory body, is criticizing any attempt to block housing access to refugees. The authority claims refugees should receive equal treatment, as required by the Dutch constitution.

Of course, the fact that there is no equal treatment currently, and that refugees are gaining access to social housing years before Dutch on waiting lists, does not appear to factor into the Council of State’s concerns, according to Dutch news outlet NOS.nl.

The minister behind the proposal, Mona Keijzer of the BBB party, says she is not backing down. Keijzer’s plan aims to create more affordable housing by ensuring that refugees, or “status holders,” no longer receive priority for housing solely because of their status

The Council of State argues that the proposal leads to unequal treatment, which is “contrary to the Constitution.” The Council has advised the cabinet not to submit the bill to the House of Representatives.

However, Minister Keijzer is not swayed by the advice.

“That’s kind of how the discussion is conducted in the Netherlands. And that’s a shame,” she said. Regarding the “unconstitutional” judgment, she stated, “The Constitution is not mathematics, it also states that I must take care of public housing for Dutch people.”

Arguments for and Against Priority Status

According to the Council of State, status holders have “an unfavorable starting position on the housing market” because they can only register for a home after arriving in the Netherlands, placing them at the bottom of waiting lists. The Council writes that while the government has proposed other measures to help status holders, it is “unrealistic” to expect them to have a timely effect, so “Permit holders therefore remain behind.”

Keijzer counters that the opposite is true, arguing that Dutch citizens are the ones currently at a disadvantage.

She noted that status holders are entitled to social housing after just 14 weeks, while the waiting lists for other home seekers can be more than 12 years.”

Treating equal cases cannot result in Dutch home seekers being treated unequally,” she said.

“Dutch people in their twenties and thirties live with their parents in the attic or share an apartment with two or three people,” she said on EO radio in August.

She believes that status holders should be expected to find housing in the same ways as other citizens, such as living with family or getting help from their employer.

“We also ask that of Dutch home seekers,” she said. The reception organization COA reports that on average, 6 to 10 percent of released social housing units go to status holders.

Keijzer said she would study the Council of State’s advice but maintained her position, saying, “But I am convinced that the ban on priority for status holders should be introduced.”

Keijzer’s proposal is different from another plan from the far-right PVV party, led by Geert Wilders, which seeks to completely prevent asylum seekers with residency from getting emergency housing declarations, even in cases of homelessness or domestic violence.

While that PVV plan has been adopted by the House of Representatives, Keijzer has stated that she intends to delete it because she believes it is discriminatory and “legally untenable.”

Of course, any real talk of restricting immigration is absent from Keijzer’s position, despite the Netherlands spending an estimated €400 billion on migrants between 1995 and 2019.

The country is not the only one facing a housing crisis, in part due to large waves of migrants. Neighboring Germany is also dealing with the same issue. In 2024, the country spent nearly €17 billion on housing support, with nearly half of it going to foreigners, and even office towers are now being converted to house newcomers.

In a number of shocking cases, senior citizens have even been moved out of their accommodations to make room for migrants.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 06:30

After Historic Lull In Atlantic Basin, Twin Storms At High Risk Of Intensifying

0
After Historic Lull In Atlantic Basin, Twin Storms At High Risk Of Intensifying

The peak of the Atlantic hurricane season was observed around Sept. 10, with the season running through Nov. 30.

So far, this year’s hurricane season has been unusually quiet, despite climate activists warning earlier that a so-called “climate crisis” would trigger an extreme season, and that, at all costs, the Western world must ban cow farts and petrol-powered vehicles to prevent planet Earth from erupting into a giant fireball. 

Yet here we are: hurricane experts have been bored to death by the lack of storm activity. But as the season enters its final months, activity has finally picked up, with two tropical waves now being monitored in the Atlantic Basin.

Meteorologist Ryan Maue wrote on X, “High chance of both Invest 93L & 94L developing into hurricanes with a risk to the U.S. East Coast from one of them.  Major intensity on table for both” 

The “two cyclones” system will likely be dominated by Humberto … as it should be larger and more intense High uncertainty, of course, with “Fujiwhara effect” twin vortex systems … Still potential for land impacts [westward system] to U.S. East Coast over +5-10 day period,” Maue continued. 

Other private weather forecasters, including BAMWX, also took to X to warn about the “TWO disturbances in the Atlantic Ocean that are expected to develop into tropical storms & eventually hurricanes over the next few days,” adding, “The further west one is close enough for the southeast US coast to be monitoring carefully.”

Meteorologist Matt Lanza noted on his Substack that the upper air pattern in the southwest Atlantic is “an utter mess,” which means forecast uncertainty of Invest 93L and Invest 94L increases dramatically.  

“The whole pattern bears watching for the East Coast over the next week or so,” Lanza said. “But uncertainty is extremely high, with a lot happening over a small area and any one feature having impacts on the others.”

Commenting on the historic lull in hurricane activity, Philadelphia Inquirer’s Anthony Wood pointed out, “In the era of reliable surveillance, dating back roughly 85 years, such a lull has happened only once before — in 1992, and that was an extraordinary case.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 05:45

Chevron Strikes Deal With Israel To Build Natural Gas Supply Pipeline To Egypt

0
Chevron Strikes Deal With Israel To Build Natural Gas Supply Pipeline To Egypt

Authored by Alex Kimani via OilPrice.com,

Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CVX) has signed a deal with Israel Natural Gas Lines, Israel’s state-owned pipeline operator, to begin construction of the Nitzana natural gas pipeline that will transport natural gas from the giant Leviathan Gas Field to Egypt.

Scheduled to be completed in three years, the $610 million pipeline is expected to ease Egypt’s ongoing energy crisis, which currently spends billions of dollars every year importing liquefied natural gas (LNG) to meet surging domestic energy demand.

The Nitzana pipeline will transport ~600 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, bringing Israel’s total export capacity to Egypt to more than 2.2 billion cubic feet per day. Israel’s NewMed is Leviathan’s main operator with a 45.3% working interest; Chevron has a 39.7% working interest, while Ratio Energies has 15%. Founded in 1992, Ratio Energy is one of Israel’s leading energy partnerships, with a mission to develop and produce natural gas and oil.

Egypt’s natural gas production has declined rapidly over the years due to the natural depletion of mature fields, including the Zohr gas field. Coupled with a lack of significant new discoveries since 2015, surging domestic demand for electricity, and past financial issues such as hard currency shortages and payment arrears to foreign companies, Egypt now finds itself in a tenuous position,  becoming a net gas importer since 2022, and relying on imported Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as well as pipeline gas from Israel. Last year, Egypt imported a record 981 million cubic feet per day of natural gas from Israel, good for 18.2% year-over-year increase. Egypt imports up to 20% of its gas from Israel. Last month, Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly announced that the $35-billion gas supply agreement signed with Israel’s NewMed Energy was extended until 2040. But the fate of these gas flows now hangs in the balance, with tensions in the Middle East escalating after the Israeli military ordered residents of Gaza City to evacuate. 

Last month, Netanyahu declared that he is “deeply committed to the vision of Greater Israel,’’ encompassing parts of Arab countries stretching from the Euphrates to the Nile.

According to Israel Hayom,  Netanyahu has instructed officials “not to move forward with the massive gas deal with Egypt without his personal approval.”

On its part, Chevron is now moving on three major geopolitical fronts at once:

  1. finalizing terms for the Nitzana pipeline to ship Israeli gas into Egypt,

  2. bidding for offshore blocks near Crete that Libya claims as its own,

  3. and preparing a long-delayed final investment decision (FID) on the Leviathan expansion.

Together, the moves put the U.S. major at the center of the East Mediterranean’s most combustible mix of energy ambition and maritime dispute. Chevron has partnered with Greece’s HelleniQ Energy to bid for exploration rights in offshore blocks south of Crete and the Peloponnese. Athens views this development as a major step towards asserting its sovereignty  over the contested waters. Waters south of Crete and the Peloponnese are contested due to a 2019 Turkey-Libya maritime agreement that ignores Greece’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claims and is a response to potential hydrocarbon reserves in the area. Greece claims these areas based on international law, while Turkey disputes that islands like Crete can generate EEZs and views the situation as a geopolitical power struggle. Libya also claims significant portions of the area, aligning with Turkey’s position.

Meanwhile, Chevron has long delayed a final investment decision (FID) on the Leviathan expansion due to security concerns and a need for greater market demand, particularly after the October 2023 conflict. However, Chevron and its partners, NewMed Energy and Ratio Energies, now expect to take the FID on the Leviathan Phase 1B expansion, which includes drilling, subsea systems, and a potential floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility, in the fourth quarter of 2025. This expansion is projected to significantly increase the field’s annual production capacity and is supported by a recent historic gas export deal, a revised development plan approved by Israel in August 2025, and ongoing contract negotiations with potential customers.

Discovered in 2010, the Leviathan is located approximately 130 km off the shores of Haifa. The 330-square kilometer field holds ~22.9 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas, making it the largest natural gas reservoir in the Mediterranean, and one of the largest producing assets in the region. Production is facilitated by 4 subsea wells that are connected to an offshore platform via a subsea manifold and two 120 km long pipelines, where all processing of gas takes place. The gas is then piped to shore into the Israeli national grid and distributed to clients in Israel, Egypt, and Jordan.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 05:00

Europe’s Top Causes Of Death, Ranked; Cancer Is #2

0
Europe’s Top Causes Of Death, Ranked; Cancer Is #2

More than 5 million people died in the EU in 2022.

The infographic, via Visual Capitalist’s Pallavi Rao, breaks down top causes of death that year, revealing the persistent dominance of heart-related illnesses and the continued threat from cancer.

Data for this visualization comes from Eurostat.

While the data is somewhat dated, it was only released in March, 2025, and points to ongoing trends in mortality patterns.

Cardiovascular Diseases Still Top the List

Diseases of the circulatory system (think heart diseases and strokes) accounted for nearly 1.7 million deaths in 2022.

This was more than the combined total of the next two categories.

Note: Per the World Health Organization (WHO), a main cause of death is “the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury.” Data derived from the medical certificate of death, which is obligatory in the Member States. The information recorded in the death certificate is according to the rules specified by the WHO.

Cardiovascular mortality correlates strongly with age: people over 65 represent about 9 in 10 of these deaths.

For reference, 85% of all deaths in this year (4.4 million) occurred among people aged over the age of 65.

ℹ️ Related: Europe has some of the highest life expectancies in the world.

Central and Eastern European countries, where smoking and hypertension rates remain high, record the highest death rates per 100,000 residents.

Cancer’s Persistent—and Growing—Burden

Cancer caused 1.15 million EU deaths in 2022, or just under one-quarter of the total.

Lung cancer leads the pack for men, while breast cancer is the deadliest for women.

When looking at totals however, lung and colorectal cancers accounted for one-third of all cancer deaths in the EU.

Unlike circulatory diseases, cancer mortality trends vary sharply by tumor type.

For example, deaths from stomach cancer have fallen around the world, yet pancreatic cancer deaths continue to rise.

COVID-19 and Other Rising Threats

Respiratory diseases took 363,000 lives, but that figure excludes the 312,000 officially attributed to COVID-19 in 2022.

Globally, the pandemic catapulted infectious disease back into the top five causes of death for the first time in decades.

Meanwhile, deaths linked to nervous-system disorders such as Alzheimer’s (212,000) now rival those from digestive diseases (like liver cirrhosis).

As Europe’s population continues to age, dementia-related deaths are projected to surge—posing new challenges for healthcare systems.

Looking for more European content? Check out The $19 Trillion European Union Economy on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 04:15

Digital Euro Unlikely To Launch Before 2029, ECB Board Member Says

0
Digital Euro Unlikely To Launch Before 2029, ECB Board Member Says

Authored by Helen Partz via CoinTelegraph.com,

The digital euro, the European Union’s long-planned central bank digital currency (CBDC) project, is facing delays, with its launch now expected around mid-2029.

The EU’s digital euro could become a reality in 2029, European Central Bank Executive Board member Piero Cipollone said in a Bloomberg Future of Finance event Tuesday in Frankfurt.

“The middle of 2029 could be a fair assessment,” he said, adding that the ECB has been actively discussing the project at the level of EU member states.

If correct, Cipollone’s timeline would signal another delay for the digital euro, despite widespread calls to launch the CBDC to protect Europe’s financial sovereignty amid the US stablecoin push.

European Parliament is holding up progress

According to Cipollone, the European Parliament has been the biggest obstacle to progress toward a digital euro, as it must pass legislation to move forward with the project.

“We should arrive at a general approach, as they call it, an agreement among member-states by the end of the year,” he said, adding that the Parliament is likely to have a position on a digital euro by May 2026.

ECB Executive Board member Piero Cipollone in Frankfurt on Tuesday. Source: Bloomberg

Cipollone’s assessment on Europe’s CBDC launch came soon after EU ministers reached a “compromise” on the digital euro roadmap last week, imposing holding limits on the potential digital currency.

“The compromise that we reached is that before the ECB makes a final decision in relation to issuance […] there would be an opportunity for a discussion in the Council of Ministers,” Irish Finance Minister and Eurogroup President Paschal Donohoe said at a news conference last Friday.

A MEP to report on progress on Oct. 24

While Cipollone expects the digital euro won’t launch before mid-2029, European authorities are pressing ahead with CBDC preparations, with the ECB targeting October to decide whether to move to the next phase.

A spokesperson for the ECB told Cointelegraph on Wednesday that a member of the European Parliament (MEP) is expected to deliver a progress report on the digital euro on Oct. 24.

Following the report, lawmakers will have six weeks to put forward amendments and a further five months for discussions, Cipollone reportedly said.

The digital euro: Five years in the making

Officially introduced by the ECB in October 2020, the digital euro project has emerged as one of Europe’s longest-discussed financial initiatives.

In June 2023, the European Commission published a legal proposal for a potential digital euro, yet progress within the European Parliament has remained limited.

Meanwhile, the ECB has steadily advanced the project, completing its investigation phase in November 2023 and moving into a preparation phase set to finish by October 2025.

Despite these steps, the initiative has faced significant skepticism from banks, lawmakers, member states, as well as end users, largely due to concerns around CBDC privacy.

Globally, some central banks have piloted their own digital currencies for years. China, for example, launched a pilot digital yuan wallet in early 2022. However, the digital yuan has encountered slow adoption, with critics describing many CBDCs as costly fiat replicas rather than genuine fintech innovations.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 03:30

Which Cities Have The Most Expensive Rent In The World?

0
Which Cities Have The Most Expensive Rent In The World?

Across major cities worldwide, the cost of rent has climbed sharply in recent years.

Record-high housing prices, paired with a wave of remote workers moving into new markets, are reshaping rental dynamics. At the same time, limited supply is tightening conditions even further, compounding challenges for renters in countless regions.

This graphic, via Visual Capitalist’s Dorothy Neufeld, shows the cities with the most expensive rent in the world, based on data from Deutsche Bank. Figures are in nominal U.S. dollars.

New York Has the Most Expensive Rent in the World

Here is the average monthly rent of a one-bedroom apartment in each city center in 2025:

Today, it costs on average $4,143 to rent in New York City—rising 22% over the past five years.

Even with an exodus of workers during the pandemic, prices remain high given strong demand, rich cultural activity, and the Big Apple’s position as the global epicenter of finance.

Boston, meanwhile, ranks in second with rent averaging $3,394 per month. High land and materials costs have impeded home building activity, contributing to a low supply of housing stock, further driving up prices.

Rounding out the top three is San Francisco, at $3,332, although rental costs have increased just 1% since 2020.

Beyond America, Singapore stands as the most expensive, with rent surging 55% over the period to reach $3,167—the fastest growth rate on the list. Similarly, rental costs are up 54% in Dubai, making it the costliest city to rent in the Middle East and ranking eighth overall in 2025.

To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the least affordable housing markets in North America.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 02:45

The US Is Expected To Tacitly Back Poland’s Nuclear Weapons Plans

0
The US Is Expected To Tacitly Back Poland’s Nuclear Weapons Plans

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Polish President Karol Nawrocki told French media during his trip to Paris that “I believe that Poland should be part of the nuclear sharing program, it should have its own nuclear capabilities: energy and military. This is what the Polish-French partnership is all about…(but) it may be too early to talk about [developing Poland’s own nukes].”

This comes half a year after Prime Minister Donald Tusk, his liberal-globalist rival, told parliament that Poland is “talking seriously with France” about hosting its nukes.

Their agreement raises the chances that progress might indeed be made since Polish foreign policy is formulated through collaboration between the President, Prime Minister, and Foreign Minister, the latter of whom is nowadays Tusk’s close ally Radek Sikorski. All three apparently concluded that Trump’s reluctance to do anything that could spook Putin into ending talks on Ukraine, let alone significantly escalate NATO-Russian tensions, reduces the chances that the US transfers some of its nukes to Poland.

For historical reasons, Poland’s ruling duopoly as represented by Nawrocki’s (admittedly imperfect) conservative-nationalists and Tusk’s liberal-globalists pathologically fears Russia, as does most of the population. Neither the elite nor the people will therefore “feel safe” as they see it unless Poland can “deter” Russia and “protect itself” without relying on others in the far-fetched scenario of an attack. Article 5 is considered sacred, however, doubts informally exist about the US’ actual commitment to it.

Hosting French nukes and potentially one day developing its own are thus seen by Poland as the means to this end, with Paris’ interests in this arrangement (including perhaps the second part that would violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty) being to compete with Germany for regional influence. It was this motivation, after all, which drove President Emmanuel Macron to flirt with extending his country’s nuclear umbrella over Europe earlier this year. Basing nukes in Poland is the quickest way to do that.

From the US’ perspective, the resultant exacerbation of EU-Russian tensions would further its divide-and-rule strategy, while turning a blind eye towards Poland’s possible plans to develop its own nukes just like it earlier did Pakistan’s would shift the regional balance of power in the US’ favor. Despite Polish fears about the US’ commitment to Article 5, the US isn’t expected to stand down if Russia launched a preventive strike against Polish nuclear facilities along the lines of Israel’s one against Iraq’s in 1981.

The European application of the US’ “Lead From Behind” strategy is to support Poland’s revival as a Great Power that would then shoulder more of the burden for containing Russia in Central & Eastern Europe via its leadership of the “Three Seas Initiative” across this broad space. This would enable the US to redeploy some of its troops in Europe to Asia for more muscularly containing China. The US is therefore expected to tacitly back Poland’s nuclear weapons plans in pursuit of these grand strategic goals.

Accusations of hypocrisy will abound due to its opposition to others’ reported such plans, which recently saw the US bombing Iranian nuclear facilities on this pretext, but negative media coverage is the only consequence that’ll likely follow since Russia probably won’t risk war with NATO over this.

Nevertheless, the scenarios of France deploying nukes to Poland and Poland potentially one day developing its own would spike the risk of World War III by miscalculation, but they and the US don’t seem to care much.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 09/25/2025 – 02:00

Randi Weingarten’s Fallacious Fascist Finger-Pointing

0
Randi Weingarten’s Fallacious Fascist Finger-Pointing

Authored by Larry Sand via American Greatness,

American Federation of Teachers (AFT) president Randi Weingarten has written Why Fascists Fear Teachers: Public Education and the Future of Democracy, a book she claims will empower us and give us hope. The problem is that every word coming from the union boss’s mouth is nonfactual lefty claptrap.

You don’t need to buy the book to understand what I mean. In an interview with a sycophant at The Progressive, a far-left magazine that covers politics and culture, Weingarten claims that “the undermining of public education is an intentional strategy of the right; they favor school privatization.”

Wrong. The reason most conservatives, and yes, increasing numbers of Democrats, favor parental choice is because the government school/union industrial complex is failing at its mission. On the most recent NAEP, a record-high percentage of high school seniors scored at “below basic” levels in math and reading compared to all previous assessments. So it’s not surprising that, in a recent poll, 63% of Hispanics and 68% of Blacks—typically Democrats—voiced support for a private option.

Weingarten nonsensically avers that people on the right, whom she pointedly refers to as fascists, support book bans and don’t want young people to think for themselves, and she maintains that “unions are at the forefront of expanding economic prosperity and strengthening democracy.”

It’s worth noting that there’s really nothing new here. Over the years, she has made equally fallacious comments. During a brief rant to a newsman in 2018, she bizarrely asserted that unions “actually make communities safer and…the right-wing is threatened by that.” She also said, “(School) privatization and disinvestment are only slightly more polite cousins of segregation.”

In reality, many Americans have come to mistrust teachers’ unions whose leadership is blatantly leftist, even though teachers are mixed politically. In July, National Education Association president Becky Pringle acknowledged that the NEA’s membership is nearly evenly split between Democrats, Republicans, and independents.

You might then assume that teacher union spending would be proportional, but you’d be wrong. Very wrong.

As Open Secrets discloses, in 2024, NEA spent $22,744,023 on politics, with 98.24% going to Democrats and a paltry 1.76% going to Republicans.

The AFT is even more one-sided. In “Total Contributions by Party of Recipient,” Weingarten’s organization in 2024 gave $3,069,063 (99.89%) to Democrats and a scant $3,323 (0.11%) to Republicans.

Most recently, a report by Defending Ed, a parents’ rights group, revealed multiple details about teacher union political spending, stating that left-wing philanthropic giants like the Tides Network, New Venture Fund, Sixteen-Thirty Fund, and Future Forward—the latter being the leading Super PAC supporting Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign after former President Joe Biden dropped out—received nearly $1.5 million combined from teachers’ unions.

The unions also contributed large sums of money to groups that support left-wing candidates for public office, such as the Democratic Governors Association, Democrats’ House Majority, and Senate Majority PACs.

Other recipients of their largesse include major left-wing think tanks like the Center for American Progress, which has received nearly a million dollars since 2022 from both national unions.

The state-level unions are no different. The Colorado Education Association has adopted a resolution opposing capitalism. This NEA affiliate, which represents about 40,000 educators and staff, has issued a statement saying it believes “capitalism inherently exploits children, public schools, land, labor, and resources.”

Additionally, the teachers’ unions are not allies of Jews.

The AFT is raising funds for a Gaza aid organization that has partnered with Hamas-controlled agencies like the Ministry of Social Development, which is led by Hamas leader and U.S.-designated terrorist Ghazi Hamad.

Likewise, in its latest handbook, the NEA states that there were “12 million victims of the Holocaust from different faiths, ethnicities, races, political beliefs, genders, and gender identification, abilities/disabilities, and other targeted characteristics.”

The union never addressed the Nazis’ attempted extermination of the Jewish people. But at the same time, the NEA handbook states it would teach students about the Nakba, which is described as the “forced, violent displacement and dispossession of at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homeland in 1948 during the establishment of the state of Israel.”

On the local level, the United Teachers of Los Angeles is egregiously antisemitic. Their leadership is pro-Palestinian, and the union was sued in 2024 by teachers who don’t want to be represented by them because it backs calls for the destruction of the plaintiff’s religious homeland and “promotes animosity and violence towards people of Jewish descent.”

The teachers’ unions also support racial quotas. The NEA-affiliated California Teachers Association restricts certain elected representative positions within the organization to individuals who identify as “BIPOC,” an acronym for “black, indigenous, people of color.” Those running for the organization’s at-large position “must be BIPOC,” the group’s election manual states.

NEA policy requires that each state “include BIPOC delegates in numbers proportional to the state’s population.

The Massachusetts Teachers Association, another NEA affiliate, similarly disqualifies white people from holding certain elected positions because of their race. The organization’s board of directors reserves a position for an “At-Large Director for Ethnic Minority Membership,” noting that the term refers to those who are “American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, and Cape Verdean.”

Then there’s the Michigan Education Association, which states that the governing board of its political action council must include “two members who identify as Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Color (BIPOC).”

In summary, the teachers’ unions are power-hungry. They support wealth redistribution and race-based policies, exhibit anti-Jewish sentiment, and, until the Supreme Court’s Janus decision in 2018, compelled all public school teachers to pay dues.

In addition to pushing a radical agenda, teacher union leaders are responsible for laws that prevent firing underperforming teachers and require layoffs to be based on seniority. They also insisted on the unnecessary and very harmful COVID-related shutdowns, along with other actions that have been especially damaging to minorities and the poor.

So, there is indeed extremism—or what Weingarten calls fascism—in our country. But instead of blaming those of us who support school choice and capitalism, Randi Weingarten needs to look in her own backyard.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/24/2025 – 23:25

Washington Forcing Speeding Offenders To Install GPS Speed Limiters

0
Washington Forcing Speeding Offenders To Install GPS Speed Limiters

Our nation’s complete loss of freedom is, for sure, progressing on or ahead of schedule. The latest example? Washington is now forcing repeat speed offenders to install GPS-based speed limiters, joining a growing national trend that curbs how fast drivers can go, according to Ecoportal.

Under the new law, anyone caught driving 20 mph over the limit on highways — or 10 mph over on smaller roads — must use the limiter if they want their license back.

The device works like the breath-test locks used for DUIs, but instead of measuring alcohol, it tracks speed through GPS and electronically caps the car’s top speed. Offenders must keep it installed for at least 120 days, or 150 if convicted of reckless driving. Drivers get only three temporary bypasses a month before the limiter locks them down completely. Refusing to comply means more penalties and longer suspensions.

Ecoportal writes that lawmakers pushed the measure after 2023 became the deadliest year on Washington’s roads in more than three decades, with speeding behind a third of all traffic deaths. The bill is named after four victims killed near Renton by a repeat offender who had already been in two crashes earlier that year.

Advocates say the technology will save lives, pointing out that Europe already requires limiters in all new cars. But critics see it as a dangerous precedent: the state taking control of how fast your car can move.

Once activated, the limiter doesn’t allow flexibility — emergencies, wide-open highways, or personal judgment no longer matter.

Other states are watching closely. Virginia and D.C. already use similar devices for repeat offenders, and Pennsylvania is considering its own. California’s governor vetoed a bill, warning against government overreach.

Still, with momentum growing, the “freedom of the road” could soon mean driving under electronic supervision — a future where speed is no longer a choice.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/24/2025 – 23:00