67.7 F
Chicago
Thursday, September 10, 2026
Home Blog Page 1082

Israel Arming, Bankrolling Druze Fighters In Southern Syria

0
Israel Arming, Bankrolling Druze Fighters In Southern Syria

Authored by Jason Ditz via AntiWar.com,

With tensions continuing to simmer in Syria’s Suwayda Governorate, senior Druze commanders are reporting that the Israeli government has been arming and financing Druze militias that are seeking a large amount of autonomy over the area.

Suwayda is the historic population center of the Druze minority, and back in July there was a substantial massacre of Druze civilians amid a military crackdown. The Islamist Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) has vowed to see the entire country under central government control, but after the massacre a lot of the Druze see some measure of autonomy as essential.

Getty Images

Though Israel is engaged in talks with the HTS, they also appear to be keen on undermining their stability, as they are actively invading southwestern Syria, and Suwayda is proximal to that area.

Some 3,000 Druze militia fighters are estimated to be active in the area, and now many are receiving arms and salaries from the Israelis.

The HTS isn’t clear about how they intend to centralize control in the area, but it’s one of several regions they are still trying to enhance their power in, generally those with large amount of religious or ethnic minorities.

Last month, the HTS announced that they were postponing all elections in Suwayda, which will likely limit Druze representation in parliament.

The US and Jordan, which both generally support the idea of Syria remaining contiguous and without substantial autonomy anywhere, reported Tuesday that they have agreed to a “roadmap” on advancing the situation in Suwayda.

They didn’t say what that entailed, but US envoy Tom Barrack offered his typical glowing endorsement of the idea as good for the HTS and therefore good for “all Syrians.

For many months, the new hardline Sunni regime in Damascus has been engaged in overt ethno-religious cleansing

The Syrian Army, for its part, has been withdrawing heavy weapons from Suwayda. Those weapons were largely deployed in the governorate during the July massacre, and while such redeployments may reduce tensions, it does not appear they have been withdrawing the ground troops they deployed to the area.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 17:40

Watch: ‘Dysto-Pee’in’ Toilets Won’t Give You Toilet Paper Unless You Sit Through Advertisement Or Pay Up

0
Watch: ‘Dysto-Pee’in’ Toilets Won’t Give You Toilet Paper Unless You Sit Through Advertisement Or Pay Up

In a bizarre scene straight out of a sci-fi flick, some public bathrooms in China are now holding toilet paper hostage behind advertisements, according to frustrated users venting on an anti-consumption subreddit.

Users must watch an advert or pay to access toilet roll in some Chinese public bathrooms (Picture: Reddit/Youtube via Metro)

China Insider shared a chilling video – branded “dystopian” by appalled viewers – showing people scanning QR codes on toilet paper dispensers to watch a quick ad before a stingy few squares are doled out. Want more paper or to dodge the ad? Cough up 0.5 RMB, roughly 5 cents, to bypass the nonsense. Chinese officials claim this setup curbs waste, pointing fingers at folks allegedly swiping excessive amounts of free toilet paper.

This is what capitalist communist dystopia looks like at a glimpse,” a user wrote. “The irony in it being a locked down authoritarian and economic expansionist society is ironic and subtly so dangerous.”

“This wouldn’t work in the UK, either the machine would get smashed in shortly or there would be poop smeared everywhere,” another quipped.

This isn’t China’s first foray into high-tech restroom antics – back in 2017, Beijing’s Temple of Heaven park rolled out toilet paper dispensers with facial recognition tech, raising serious questions about privacy and control, according to Metro.

However, China’s Cyberspace Administration and Ministry of Public Security have since outlawed the use of facial recognition without consent, explicitly banning the equipment in public places like hotel rooms, public bathrooms, dressing rooms, and toilets. 

*  *  *

Better get moovin and reserve your order of Beck Ground Beef – on sale for a limited time! Ships via 2-day air. 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 17:20

Rubio Says US Visa Revocations Underway After Charlie Kirk Death Celebrations

0
Rubio Says US Visa Revocations Underway After Charlie Kirk Death Celebrations

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that foreign nationals who made celebratory comments over Charlie Kirk’s assassination will have their U.S. visas revoked, adding that the process is “underway.”

“America will not host foreigners who celebrate the death of our fellow citizens,” Rubio wrote in a post on X Monday.

“Visa revocations are under way. If you are here on a visa and cheering on the public assassination of a political figure, prepare to be deported.”

Kirk was shot and killed at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10 while he was speaking at a campus event. Prosecutors on Tuesday announced charges including capital aggravated murder, witness tampering, obstruction of justice, and more against Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah man who was arrested last week.

In an interview with Fox News on Monday, Rubio confirmed that the State Department will not grant visas to people who celebrated Kirk’s death and said that people who have U.S. visas will have their status revoked.

“We are not in the business of inviting people to visit our country who are going to be involved in negative and destructive, okay,” Rubio told the outlet.

“If I invite someone, if we invite someone to visit the United States of America, as a student, as a tourist, as whatever, then the standard they should be held to is very high.”

Some social media users and influencers have made comments celebrating the Turning Point USA founder’s death, and some have been subsequently fired or suspended. Those include university employees, airline pilots, teachers, and doctors.

An organization called the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation has highlighted individuals who have posted such messages online. The group recently said that it has compiled more than 63,000 “data entries” in connection to an effort to compile those users.

On Monday, Vice President JD Vance said that people who have made statements celebrating his assassination should be fired from their jobs.

“Call their employer. We don’t believe in political violence, but we do believe in civility, and there is no civility in the celebration of political assassination,” Vance said as he hosted Kirk’s podcast.

Last week, a State Department official said that X users should inform the department about any visa holders making celebratory remarks online.

“I have been disgusted to see some on social media praising, rationalizing, or making light of the event, and have directed our consular officials to undertake appropriate action,” Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said in a statement on X last week.

Other Trump administration officials have signaled that the federal government may go after left-wing groups, NGOs, and their funding sources in the wake of Kirk’s death.

Earlier this year, the State Department ordered U.S. Embassies to pause new student visa interviews, namely in relation to social media screening, an official told The Epoch Times at the time.

“We take very seriously the process of vetting who it is that comes into the country,” State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters in May.

And in August, the Trump administration signaled it would look into all 55 million visa holders in the United States.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 17:00

FBI’s ‘Armed Queers’ Probe Just The Start – Lawmakers Urge Treasury To Freeze China-Linked Billionaire’s NGO Empire

0
FBI’s ‘Armed Queers’ Probe Just The Start – Lawmakers Urge Treasury To Freeze China-Linked Billionaire’s NGO Empire

Well, well, well. The Democratic Party’s dark-money-funded NGO network – bankrolled by leftist billionaires and even possibly foreign adversaries – is coming under intense scrutiny after a leftist woke warrior assassinated Charlie Kirk one week ago. Assassination culture has been normalized by the Democratic Party, which spews hate and misinformation around the clock, labeling anyone they dislike as a “fascist” or “Nazi.” 

Scrutiny of dark-money funded NGO networks comes as Marxist revolutionaries from “Armed Queers Salt Lake City popped onto the radar of federal agents while investigating the political assassination of Kirk. Now, the White House has declared war on radical leftist groups, lawmakers want answers, and an all-of-government approach will likely ramp up shortly to dismantle the revolutionary cells that want to collapse capitalism and the country. 

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican, offered much-needed insight into the Marxist revolution being fueled by radical leftist groups, highlighting what appear to be alarming connections with foreign adversaries such as China.

Luna wrote on X:

Armed Queers SLC” is now under FBI investigation as an extended network related to Charlie’s killer.

The founder of Armed Queers SLC is also an organizer for PSL [The People’s Forum], which is funded by Neville Singham and the Chinese Communist Party.

Why did Armed Queers SLC delete their Instagram after Charlie was murdered?

Why is Neville Singham affiliated with radical extremist groups that may have ties to Charlie Kirk’s assassin?

Profiling Armed Queers SLC’s X following list, numerous revolutionary groups were identified:

Armed Queers SLC founder Ermiya Fanaeian’s relationship with PSL/Communist China is very alarming, given the propaganda pushed by the group in Salt Lake…

Preparing for a revolution? 

And as we noted earlier in the week, Armed Queers had an obsession with “No Kings” protest and the 50501 movement

And guess who funds No Kings? As per Schweizer’s reporting:

New Schweizer team investigation reveals how ‘No Kings’ and its partners bagged $114.8 million from the Arabella dark money network and how these professional protest organizations use tax dollars as a force multiplier.”

Are you beginning to see how the Democratic Party’s dark-money-funded NGO network operates?

Follow the money. via Real Political Data

“Bad actors like Neville Roy Singham are funding and supporting far-left groups to sow division, hatred, and political unrest in America. The poisoned climate they create fuels tragedies like the assassination of Charlie Kirk,” Luna wrote in a separate X post. 

She noted, “House Oversight has officially requested that @SecScottBessent review Singham’s assets and determine whether they should be frozen or seized. We must stop the hate before another tragedy occurs.”

Civil terrorism expert Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising explains how the Marxist revolution is using NGOs as vehicles to sow chaos nationwide:

One of the hardest parts of confronting rising left-wing extremism is that even those who care about the issue often don’t understand how it operates. That’s not their fault—it’s extraordinarily complex. The revolution against the West spans thousands of organizations that may not be formally linked but are marching in unison toward the revolution.

A concise overview looks like this:

  • Political Orgs: The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the primary political arm, with the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) close behind. PSL is part of the Neville Roy Singham network and serves as their vehicle for running political candidates.

  • Militant Anarchists: A growing militant wing trains in weapons and self-defense, including groups such as Antifa, the Socialist Rifle Association, Armed Queers, Behind Enemy Lines, and Unity of Fields.

  • Climate Activism: Billions have flowed into climate-activist organizations, many of which increasingly employ anarchists.

  • Social & Racial Justice Groups: Since the rise of BLM, billions—public funds included—have supported the social and racial justice groups that regularly advocate for burning down the country.  

  • Civil-Rights & Legal Orgs: Legacy anti-Western activists (“movement lawyers”) staff these groups, suing governments, police, and schools while training allies to push limits without triggering terrorism charges.

  • Foreign Interest Groups: Beyond the Neville Roy Singham network, other foreign powers, including the CCP, maintain domestic footholds.

  • Funding: Much of the money for this revolutionary activity comes from the progressive NGO ecosystem—Open Society Foundations, Tides, Ford, Rockefeller Brothers, Arabella Advisors, and the broader dark-money network.

The civil terrorism expert continued: 

In 1969, before declaring war on the U.S. government, some Weather Underground leaders traveled to Cuba to meet with North Vietnamese representatives and learn from their revolutionary experience. After these meetings, the group accepted funding, training, and tactical guidance from Cuban officials.

A 1977 FBI report indicated that Cuban espionage agents provided “limited aid and guerrilla warfare techniques, including the use of arms and explosives,” to members of the Venceremos Brigade.

Now you may be wondering: how does this connect to today’s radical left extremist groups? It never stopped. Organizations like the DSA, BLM, the Singham Network, Unity of Fields, and yes, “Armed Queers” have all taken delegation trips to Cuba, where they were further radicalized, trained in anti-Western revolutionary tactics, and scouted as potential intelligence assets.

Not only is the Venceremos Brigade fiscally sponsored by the People’s Forum, but Manolo De Los Santos lived in Cuba for six years, one year longer than the five typically required for formal Cuban intelligence training.

What is the leader of Armed Queers doing with Elizabeth Warren??

Related:

When the left has had power, it has gone after conservatives and their speech, so I am thrilled to see the administration promising to investigate the left-wing nonprofit sector, and hold people accountable,” Scott Walter, president of the conservative watchdog group Capital Research Center, which tracks money in politics, told New York Times journalists. 

In recent months, Walter briefed senior White House officials on nonprofit networks and fundraising techniques, while also providing research briefs, including one titled “Marching Toward Violence,” that purported to link anti-Israel protests on college campuses and terrorism. 

Circling back to civil terrorism expert Curtis, he explained that NGOs are being weaponized in a coordinated effort to collapse the nation: “The revolution against the West spans thousands of organizations that may not be formally linked but are marching in unison toward the revolution.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 16:20

Jerome Powell’s Fed Enters “Nightmare Territory”

0
Jerome Powell’s Fed Enters “Nightmare Territory”

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

By now you already know the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate by a quarter point to 4.00–4.25% in an 11–1 vote today, citing rising risks to the labor market as their excuse for doing so.

While newly appointed Governor Stephen Miran pushed for a deeper cut, most policymakers backed the smaller move, with the Fed signaling two more reductions are likely before year-end.

Chair Jerome Powell framed the decision as “risk management,” noting slower job growth and persistent inflation, though he rejected calls for a half-point cut.

So, what did the cut and the ensuing press conference tell me that you’re not going to hear on CNBC? This cut marks the beginning of what I believe is going to be “nightmare territory” for the Fed.

First, while many were quick to celebrate “less dissent” at the Fed, the board’s outlook was still all over the place. But it’s more than just a mixed bag of good-natured disagreements. The narrative is that Trump’s “ringer” at the Fed wants much larger cuts than anybody else, raising the risk that the market could see the Fed losing what little “independence” it is perceived to still have.

The market seeing the wide range of Fed opinions not as healthy disagreement, but as a loss of confidence, would be serious shit. Blurring these lines is like letting the inflation “genie” out of the bottle: once it happens, it can be impossible to walk back without severe consequences.

As an investor, I’ve been preparing for this, but the distortions it could create—and the consequences for everyday Americans, especially runaway inflation—could be catastrophic.

Powell’s press conference, which just concluded, offered nothing of substance whatsoever. Not even a hint of a tangible solution or clear path forward. Instead, it was an hour of doublespeak, vague qualifiers, and hedging, which basically summed up to this: “We cut today because the pressure to do so was overwhelming, and because the labor market gave us cover. But we really have no idea how we’re going to balance our two objectives—price stability and maximum employment—going forward.”

The only thing the conference made clear is that we were right to assume the Fed is going to swing back and forth between its mandates for cover, working the gas and the brake at the same time, whenever and however it suits them. Either way, it doesn’t matter — whichever mandate it chooses to address, the outcome is the same: more inflation.

If the Fed prioritizes the labor market, it’ll cut rapidly, and inflation—which is still nowhere near the Fed’s 2% target—will continue to run rampant. If it tries to be a hero and fight inflation, it risks triggering both an economic and an inflationary depression across markets.

Nothing today changes the view I’ve had. The Fed is cutting rates, but not quickly enough. As I’ve said before, the gears of the economy are already stuck and will soon start moving in reverse. The stock market will then go through sharp deleveraging and a downturn, forcing the Fed to cut faster—a possibility Powell himself alluded to today when talking about the pace of cuts.

After that, the bond market will keep pushing yields higher at the long end of the curve, signaling that both the Fed and the country have lost credibility and creditworthiness. At that point, the Fed will start buying bonds, which will push the inflation machine into overdrive and keep us on the path toward the monetary reset I’ve been warning about for years.

I was appalled when Janet Yellen became Treasury Secretary after serving as Fed Chair. I couldn’t believe that after her tenure at the Fed she didn’t just retire and watch the system self destruct while trying to find the worm at the bottom of a tequila bottle somewhere on a Mexican beach. And somehow, despite the damage she’s done as Treasury Secretary, the economy hasn’t yet imploded and the Fed hasn’t yet lost all credibility.

Now, whenever it does happen, I think Powell will wind up taking the blame for both—especially if you ask President Trump. I can’t help but think Powell is counting down the days until he’s relieved of his duties. He’s in an extremely unenviable position as the Fed enters this “nightmare territory” where it simply will not be able to maintain balance between its two mandates. And even if he slips out before everything collapses, it’ll be “Powell’s Fed” that will be left to face the music and take the blame shortly after.

Nothing about today’s Fed action changes my outlook. For my latest thoughts on how I see the next 12 months playing out for the macro economy, listen to this interview—and for how I’m positioning myself, read this piece I published just hours ago.

Changing My Strategy Heading Into 2026

Vaya con Dios, my kind subscribers.

QTR’s DisclaimerPlease read my full legal disclaimer on my About page hereThis post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.

The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 15:50

Hate Crime Charge After Subway Rider Called “White Boy”, Then Brutally Attacked On L Train

0
Hate Crime Charge After Subway Rider Called “White Boy”, Then Brutally Attacked On L Train

A young woman is facing hate crime charges after allegedly assaulting a fellow passenger in a violent, unprovoked attack on a Manhattan subway train, according to the NY Post.

The incident unfolded around 2:10 a.m. Sunday aboard a southbound L train at the 1st Avenue and East 14th Street station. Authorities said Genesis Gittens — who had just celebrated her 20th birthday on Monday — was yelling when a 28-year-old man sitting nearby glanced in her direction.

That look reportedly sent Gittens into a fury. She began striking the rider in the face multiple times while hurling slurs, shouting, “White boy” and “cracker,” according to a criminal complaint. The repeated punches left the victim with a bloody nose, though he declined medical treatment, police said.

The NY Post writes that officers arrested Gittens less than an hour later. She was charged with third-degree assault as a hate crime, the complaint states. During her arraignment, she pleaded not guilty and was released, court records show.

The L train incident was not the only subway violence reported that day. Around 9 a.m. Sunday, police said a man believed to be homeless attacked a 35-year-old MTA cleaner from behind inside the 34th Street–Hudson Yards No. 7 station.

The assailant, who wore all gray and carried a blue blanket, allegedly punched the worker in the back of the head several times. After the victim fell, the attacker — who was barefoot — kicked him repeatedly, cops and sources said.

The suspect fled and remained at large as of Monday. Like the earlier victim, the cleaner refused medical attention at the scene.

* * *

Click pic and snag some beef-ore the sale ends (sorry). 

 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 15:30

Fed Cuts Rates By 25bps; Powell ‘Bends The Knee’, Signals Dovish Path Ahead

0
Fed Cuts Rates By 25bps; Powell ‘Bends The Knee’, Signals Dovish Path Ahead

Tl;dr: Nine months after it last adjusted rates, The Fed finally bent the knee this afternoon and cut rates by 25bps (as fully priced in by the market).

Only once since it started publishing its target rate in the 1970s had The Fed waited longer. That was 2001-2002 when, unlike now, it was a bear-market low, consumer spending was weak, and inflation was below target.

The Dot-Plot suggests The Fed members are also shifting in a dovish direction (narrowing the gap with the market) with 50bps more now set for 2025.

There was only one dissenter, newly appointed Stephen Miran who wanted a 50bps cut.

So, to clarify: The Fed is cutting rates, and projecting more rate cuts, at the same time as upgrading its growth forecast and nudging up its inflation outlook too.

WTF!!

*  *  *

Since The Fed’s last meeting (July 30th), a great deal of catalyzing events have occurred – from massive downward revisions to the so-called ‘strong’ labor market to a continued lack of (hyper) inflationary pressure from tariffs; and from a decline in geopolitical uncertainty and trade policy uncertainty offset by a much-decried by MSM rise in fears over Fed ‘independence’.

The economic data has pumped and dumped in the ensuing weeks…

Source: Bloomberg

But we do note that ‘inflation’ has surprised to the upside since the last FOMC (while the labor market has dramatically surprised to the downside)…

Source: Bloomberg

Gold has been a dramatic outperformer during the interim period with some weakness in the dollar and crude oil prices (Israel-Iran tensions eased) plunging most. Bonds and stocks are up since the last FOMC meeting…

Source: Bloomberg

Rate-cut odds dipped after the last FOMC meeting only to surge on two weak payrolls prints, pricing in fully a 25bps today (and high likelihood of another cut in each of the remaining FOMC meetings this year)…

Source: Bloomberg

Expectations for cuts in 2025 have risen notably since the last FOMC meeting (from ~2 cuts to ~3 cuts) while 2026 expectations are only very modestly more dovish)…

Source: Bloomberg

And before we get the headlines, bear in mind that the market is dramatically more dovish than the current (old) dots from The Fed. Today we get a refresh that will likely see the median dots decline (dovishly)…

Source: Bloomberg

As we noted earlier, today’s meeting has the potential to be explosive with multiple dissents (both hawkish and dovish).

So What Happened…?

RATES:

  • Cuts key overnight interest rate by 25bps to 4.00-4.25% range

  • Fed projections show additional 50bps of cuts by year end, another 25 bps of cuts in each of the next two years

  • Fed says it is attentive to both sides of dual mandate

VOTE SPLIT:

  • New governor Miran dissented on policy decision, favoring 50bps cut

LABOUR MARKET:

  • Says downside risks to employment have risen

  • Job gains have slowed, unemployment has edged up but remains low

INFLATION:

  • Inflation has moved up and remains ‘somewhat elevated’

ECONOMY:

  • Economic growth moderated over first half of this year BALANCE SHEET:

  • Fed maintains current pace of balance sheet drawdown

SUMMARY ECONOMIC PROJECTIONS:

  • GDP forecasts raised for 2025, 2026 and 2027

  • Unemployment rate forecast for 2025 unch, lowered for 2026 and 2027

  • PCE forecast for 2025 unch, raised for 2026, unch for 2027

  • Core PCE forecast for 2025 unch, raised for 2026 and unch for 2027

The new projections show inflation finally returning to the 2% target in 2028. That would mark seven straight years of inflation surpassing the target! 

Still, that’s less than the nine straight years of under-shooting from 2012 through 2020.

DOTS:

The dots for 2025 were massively shifted lower with one member calling for 5 cuts in 2025. 7 of the 19 members see no more rate-cuts this year…

  • 9 of 19 see 2 more cuts 

  • 2 of 19 see 1 more cuts

  • 6 of 19 see no more cuts

  • 1 sees 1 rate hike, and drumroll…

  • 1 sees 5 cuts (this is Stephen Miran)

Fed Funds rate forecast cut for 2025 from 3.9% to 3.6% or another 2 rate cuts.

So the median forecast for next year pencils in just one more rate cut, after the two further moves this year. Not a lot there.

Bloomberg’s Ira Jersey notes that while the skew of the Dot-plot remains for slower cuts this year, the median year-end 2026 dot not only moved lower, but there are now five members who see rates below 3%.

And then another cut in 2027 to 3.1%

That would mean 125 basis points of cutting from September 2025 until the end of 2027. That’s way, way short of the 300 basis points Trump has wanted for, like, now.

So, to clarify:

The Fed is cutting rates, and projecting more rate cuts, at the same time as upgrading its growth forecast and nudging up its inflation outlook too.

WTF!

Read the full redline below:

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 15:30

Game-Changer? Are Meta And Zuckerberg Ready To Fight For Free Speech

0
Game-Changer? Are Meta And Zuckerberg Ready To Fight For Free Speech

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

I created a Facebook account recently.

No one was more surprised than myself.

From my book, “The Indispensable Right,” to my past columns, I have been one of the most vocal critics of Facebook and Meta regarding their free speech policies.

From their expansive censorship record to their failure to disclose details on their coordination with the federal government, many in the free speech community saw Meta as the embodiment of the anti-free speech movement growing around the world.

Then something happened. Elon Musk happened.

He bought Twitter and dismantled its massive censorship operation. He then turned over what became known as the Twitter Files.

Those files confirmed extensive coordination by the government with academia and social media companies to censor speech, including core political speech.

Eventually, Facebook released its files, and founder Mark Zuckerberg apologized for the censorship that had occurred under the prior system, pledging to restore free speech protections. In doing so, Meta adopted some of the changes Musk made at the newly named X.

Meta can be a gamechanger for free speech

For many, the Meta culpa seemed strained and opportunistic. However, I had the opportunity to have in-depth discussions with Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan about these plans. I was impressed and I wrote that, despite the bad blood with the company, the free speech community should give Meta a chance to prove that it was serious about restoring free speech protections.

As I stated in my column, we need Meta. Musk changed the trajectory of the fight for free speech, but the difference between the two companies is impossible to ignore. X reports that it has roughly 600 million users. Facebook remains the largest social media company, with more than 3 billion users.

For free speech defenders, it is the difference between England’s entry into World War II and the United States’ entry. Musk slowed the progress of the anti-free speech movement. Zuckerberg could reverse the direction.

Recently, Kaplan and I reviewed the progress at Meta. He was remarkably transparent and candid about their efforts, and what I learned was heartening.

The chief global affairs officer stated that “we are allowing more speech,” but the company has not seen an explosion of hate speech as a result of greater tolerance for opposing views.

He admitted that “content was being taken down that should not have been taken down. We reduced over-enforcement.”

“We reduced the number of false positives by more than 50% without an explosion of prevalence,” Kaplan said.

“We track how many times our classifiers ‘get it wrong’ through labeling and human review.”

What he found was that “we had this blunt approach to reduce civic content in their feeds on Facebook and Instagram. We removed those and started treating political content like other content. We fundamentally changed how we treat content.”

Facebook is relying more on community notes rather than removal of postings, much like X. The company now has a massive number of community note contributors and a system designed to counter the most biased or strident posters.

The biggest change has resulted from modifying the company’s classifiers, the automated systems used to enforce policies. Meta found that these classifiers were too broad, resulting in excessive content being taken down. It turned off low-precision classifiers, except for illegal and high-severity areas ‒ like terrorism, child sexual exploitation, drugs, fraud and scams.

At the same time, Meta has implemented greater monitoring to track “false positives.” It was able to reduce the number of false positives by more than half without any significant increase in violating content. Now, in its integrity report for the second quarter, Meta shows that it has achieved an even more impressive mark in reducing over-enforcement, cutting enforcement mistakes in the United States by more than 75% every week.

The experience at Meta seems to confirm what some of us have long argued. Yielding to those who demand censorship only produces an insatiable appetite for more speech curtailment. It fuels a class of speech phobes, who spend more time trying to silence others than speaking their own voices.

Meta experienced this same snowballing of censorship. Notably, when the company moved to restore greater free speech protection, it did not experience a comparative rise in violative speech.

European Union poses biggest challenge to free speech

The greatest challenge, however, still lies ahead for the company. The European Union remains the greatest threat to free speech facing Americans. After Musk purchased X with a pledge to restore free speech, figures like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton demanded that the EU use its infamous Digital Services Act to force X to censor Americans.

The EU has threatened Musk with confiscatory fines that could surpass $1 billion, according to The New York Times.

Meta is clearly trying to find an accommodation with the EU, which may still object to its move to rely on community notes rather than direct censorship. The EU could also object to the reduction of broad classifiers in allowing a greater scope of discussion and dissent.

However, with the Trump administration warning the EU about its efforts to censor Americans, Meta could help recreate a formidable alliance for free speech. For the first time, the free speech community might have a coalition of government and corporate allies that could stand up to the EU.

Hopefully, Meta will expand its notification to citizens in EU countries that they are being denied access to information due to “geoblocking” pursuant to EU censorship regulations. With a united front in the United States for free speech, we can serve as a bastion for those who value this human right.

That is why I have created a Facebook account (jonathanturleyUSA). No doubt, it was the moment that Zuckerberg had long dreamed of.

However, it’s possible that he truly wants to restore free speech in social media. What is clear is that he is already drawing the ire of the anti-free speech movement, which previously unleashed an unrelenting campaign against Musk and his businesses.

The free speech community needs to support Meta. That does not mean that we are chumps. We have often found false friends in both government and corporations.

If Meta stays on this course, we could finally have a coalition of the willing to fight for free speech on a global scale.

Call it a leap of faith in Facebook with our eyes wide open.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of the bestselling book “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 15:10

Discord Scrutinized In Kirk Assassination, Used By Canadian Far-Left Networks To Circulate Political Target Files, Lawyer Says

0
Discord Scrutinized In Kirk Assassination, Used By Canadian Far-Left Networks To Circulate Political Target Files, Lawyer Says

Submitted by The Bureau’s Sam Cooper,

Discord, the communications platform now under scrutiny as U.S. investigators examine chat room messages involving the alleged assassin of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, is also being used by left-wing Antifa-aligned networks in Canada to organize and share dossiers on political targets, according to Toronto lawyer and independent journalist Caryma Sa’d.

In a wide-ranging interview for The Bureau Podcast, Sa’d, who has covered a proliferation of street protests in Canada, alleged that Antifa-aligned networks rely on gated Discord servers to coordinate harassment campaigns and “dox-style” targeting of foes. Even more alarming, she said, is that some of the information shared would not be publicly available, suggesting that government, legal, or union insiders may have leveraged sensitive data.

What makes her claims especially relevant in the current climate is her belief that the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN), a federally funded nongovernmental organization, has been involved in what she perceives as Antifa’s targeting activity in Canada. Because Canada’s Liberal government has directed nearly $1 million to CAHN, and because the group liaises with public safety agencies to disseminate its perception of extremist threats, Sa’d argues this has skewed the state’s focus, overlooking the growing threat of violence from Antifa.

Sa’d says that both she and some of her clients have been singled out, and she describes Antifa as a loosely aggregated, cell-like organization that transcends the U.S.–Canada border, operating simultaneously in online forums and in street collectives. These protests, she says, often coalesce under a “solidarity” banner that brings together activists for trans rights, Indigenous rights, migrant rights, encampment movements, safe-supply campaigns, and pro-Palestine demonstrations.

“If we think of Antifa as a movement, it’s not, at least to my observation, like, ‘here’s your card, you’re now a card-carrying member and please pay your dues,'” Sa’d explained. “It’s more like a cell structure and there is both an online and a real-world component. It’s organized regionally, but particularly the online aspect can be national and international. And Discord plays a huge part in this because it allows people to connect online in private servers.”

Sa’d did not provide details of her investigations into the alleged targeting dossiers shared on Discord, but suggested her research grew out of her own experience of being targeted.

“The compiling of information on political targets could include social media handles, involvement in court cases, where they live, who their family is, what their connections are, and where they appear in public life,” Sa’d said.

According to Sa’d, Anti-Hate had first approached her to collaborate on some research publications, “that never panned out.”

“We couldn’t agree to terms and that was fine. And a few months after that, I was the subject of an article that framed me as a fascist sympathizer. And, you know, it’s only gotten worse since then.”

Public records show that CAHN has received a total of $908,400 in federal funding across three agreements since 2020: $268,400 under Canadian Heritage’s Anti-Racism Action Program; $440,000 under Canadian Heritage’s Community Support, Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism Initiatives Program; and $200,000 from Public Safety Canada’s Community Resilience Fund for a two-year project running from April 2024 to March 2026.

Sa’d said this funding is problematic because, in her view, CAHN “takes public money to put targets on private citizens.”

How I came to be interested, particularly in Antifa, is the Canadian Anti-Hate Network,” she said. “It is an NGO that purports to document and fight against specifically far-right hate. And in having such a narrow focus, I think that has created almost a vacuum that has allowed the far left to metastasize.”

She pointed to an Ontario court ruling that found CAHN had assisted the Antifa movement.

In the court case Sa’d cited, the judge accepted evidence that CAHN “did in fact assist Antifa” and acknowledged the movement’s violent record. CAHN, for its part, denied supporting violence “directly or indirectly” or funding “violent Antifa.”

Sa’d said she is concerned that the government’s funding of CAHN has contributed to a skewed perspective among Canadian public safety officials.

“There is an ideological bent to what law enforcement is choosing to focus on,” she said, arguing that federal intelligence and policing have over-weighted threats from the right while under-recognizing left-aligned street violence. She cited on-scene incitement at a Toronto protest following the Kirk shooting, in which a woman she classified as an Antifa-aligned activist told another person—”die fascist, one in the neck”—an evident reference to Kirk’s shooting. The remark, captured on tape, drew little response from Toronto police, Sa’d said.

Tyler Robinson, 22, was charged yesterday with the aggravated murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in the shooting at Utah Valley University that Utah’s governor, Spencer Cox, called a political assassination. Charging documents say Robinson, who had recently become engaged with left-wing politics and was dating a partner who was transitioning to female, decided to shoot Kirk because he believed Kirk “spreads too much hate,” saying he had “had enough of his hatred.”

Prosecutors allege Robinson planned the act over a week; after the shooting, he allegedly sent texts and Discord messages admitting his role. Among the most telling evidence, Cox said last week, were bullet casings inscribed with phrases including “Hey fascist, catch this” and references to the anti-fascist anthem Bella Ciao—a song that originated with Italian partisans resisting Nazi occupation in World War II and has since been adopted by Antifa-aligned groups in the United States, according to reports. FBI Director Kash Patel has since said dozens of Robinson’s Discord contacts will be questioned as part of the investigation. Though an internal Discord review reportedly found “no evidence that the suspect planned this incident or promoted violence on Discord,” Patel told Congress that investigators will examine members of the same group chat.

In an interview with The Bureau, Sa’d described how Discord servers are tiered, with some rooms requiring special access. In exclusive spaces, she said, dossiers on political targets are shared.

“The information isn’t always publicly sourced,” she said, “which would suggest that some of the participants have access to information by virtue of being public servants or members of particular unions. And I don’t say any of this lightly. In my travels, I’ve encountered people from various professions—teachers, professors, nurses, bureaucrats, lawyers, political staffers—who are involved in this movement.”

Sa’d said both she and her clients have been targeted, and that police have shown a persistent reluctance to investigate what she described as “verifiable, documented” harassment and swarming. “There just doesn’t seem to be an appetite to get to the bottom of this,” she said.

While she stopped short of attributing direct foreign interference to fomenting protest movements in Canada, Sa’d noted that footage of Canadian unrest is often amplified by outlets from hostile foreign states, and that protest narratives sometimes pivot inorganically in ways consistent with outside influence. Her conclusion was blunt: Canada’s institutions — from school boards to the Prime Minister’s Office — are politicized and vulnerable to extremism, and “cleaning house” in Canada’s approach to countering extremism is a prerequisite for restoring even-handed rule of law.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 13:20

EU Proposes Freezing Israel Trade Pact As Smotrich Declares Gaza ‘Real Estate Bonanza’

0
EU Proposes Freezing Israel Trade Pact As Smotrich Declares Gaza ‘Real Estate Bonanza’

On Wednesday the European Commission presented a proposal for new tariffs and sanctions aimed at pressuring Israel to quickly end its military operations in Gaza, in addition to sanctions measures on two Israeli ministers known for their fiery anti-Palestinian rhetoric.

“The horrific events taking place in Gaza on a daily basis must stop,” EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said after presenting the proposal to the EU Council. “There needs to be an immediate ceasefire, unrestrained access for all humanitarian aid, and the release of all hostages held by Hamas.”

The measures would if implemented constitute a major, historic blow to EU-Israel relations. The commission appears to be largely responding to the new Gaza City offensive, confirmed to be in full swing this week, and the major United Nations investigation just released which concluded that Israel is guilty of genocide.

“We’re not proposing to suspend trade with Israel, we are proposing to suspend trade preferences,” said a senior unnamed European official.

A decades-long deal and trade-related pillar of the Israel-EU Association Agreement is reportedly what’s on the chopping block. According to Middle East Eye:

Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said on Wednesday that if a qualified majority is reached, the EU will impose 230m euros ($166m) tariffs on 37 percent of the 15.9bn euros of the EU’s imports from Israel, instead of free trade. 

Israel is the EU’s largest trade partner. In 2024, EU-Israel trade reached a record 42.6bn euros, of which 37 percent is “preferential treatment”, according to the EU’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.  

“So definitely this step will have a high cost for Israel,” Kallas told Euronews on Tuesday.

The two ministers being targeted in the potential new measures are National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. They would face asset freezes and a blanket travel ban for travel within the European Union.

Smotrich’s latest Wednesday comments will not at all help his case in the eyes of European officials. He has newly stated that the Gaza Strip that the Gaza Strip is a “real estate bonanza.” Further he claimed to be in talks with the Americans on how to divide the enclave up once the Palestinians are kicked out.

There is “a real estate bonanza” in Gaza that “pays for itself” and he has “already started negotiations with the Americans,” he said at a conference in Tel Aviv, according to local media.

“We have poured a lot of money into this war. We have to see how we are dividing up the land in percentages,” Smotrich said, explaining that “the demolition, the first stage in the city’s renewal, we have already done. Now we just need to build.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/17/2025 – 12:40