62.8 F
Chicago
Friday, September 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 1115

‘Critically Uneducated’: Russia, China Mock EU’s Kaja Kallas After Bizarre Commentary

0
‘Critically Uneducated’: Russia, China Mock EU’s Kaja Kallas After Bizarre Commentary

European foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas is being widely mocked after a clip of her latest remarks on Russia and China went viral starting last week.

While speaking at an event hosted by the EU Institute for Security Studies, Kallas presented some strange analysis claiming that Russians are strong in social sciences but weak in tech, and that the Chinese are the reverse. The comments lacked explanation or nuance, and came off as utterly simplistic and based merely on overly broad stereotypes in her mind.

“Chinese are very good at technology but they are not that good in social sciences,” Kallas said. “The Russians… are not good at technology at all, but super good in social sciences.”

She’s also being called out for her reflections on the Soviet Union and China in World War 2. Her comments were a response to President Xi’s massive military parade in Beijing. 

Kallas, who is from Estonia, of course very much hates Russia and so does not want to give credit to Moscow’s immense role in WWII against the Nazis. She dismissed the Russians and China’s role in defeating the axis powers.

She had said the following which has additionally angered both countries:

I was at the ASEAN summit, and something seemed interesting to me. Russia turned to China and said: “We, Russia and China, fought together in The Second World War, we won the Second World War, we defeated Nazism together.

And I thought, “Okay, this is something new. If you know a little history, then a lot of questions immediately arise in your head. But you know, today people read and remember history less and less, so, unfortunately, many people believe in such narratives.”

On Sunday the Russian foreign ministry blasted her analysis, calling Kallas “critically uneducated”. Specifically on her labeling Russian and Chinese societies, the FM spokesperson said–

“On the same note, China would not be able to govern a billion citizens without being strong in social sciences,” Zakharova wrote. “Kallas is critically uneducated.”

China’s foreign ministry has also responded, saying, “The statement made by the relevant EU official is full of ideological bias and lacks basic historical common sense, and blatantly stokes rivalry and confrontation. This is disrespectful to the history of WW2 and undermines the EU’s own interests. It’s preposterous and irresponsible.”

One China commentator, Arnaud Bertrand, concluded: “It takes a lot for China to officially call a senior foreign leader an idiot but that’s what they essentially just did.”

Check out the PANTRY… mangoes, honey and soap selling like hotcakes today

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 15:20

Kremlin’s Top Negotiator Declares Putin & Trump “Will Prevent WW3”

0
Kremlin’s Top Negotiator Declares Putin & Trump “Will Prevent WW3”

The Russians are either incredibly optimistic that bilateral ties with the US can improve, or else they are just stoking Trump’s ego, with the same end goal in mind. 

At a moment the US and European leaders are consulting on a potential 19th round of major energy and banking sector sanctions against Russia, Kirill Dmitriev, top Kremlin negotiator and senior aide on international economic affairs, touted that Presidents Putin and Trump are closer to ending the conflict in Ukraine.

He went to as to say their efforts could help avert a potential World War III. He wrote on X over the weekend, to the surprise of many that “Stalin, Roosevelt & Churchill won WWII. Putin & Trump will prevent WWIII.” The post featured a photo of the 1945 Yalta Conference, where the leaders of the US, Soviet Union, and the UK met to shape the post-World War II order following the defeat of Nazi Germany.

Separately, he pushed back against US and Western officials who accuse Moscow of intentionally slow-playing and ultimately thwarting peace efforts in Ukraine, while at the same take taking more territory on the ground.

Specifically in response to former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, Dmitriev said: “Wrong. Peace is close precisely because of Trump-Putin dialogue. Idiotic [former US President Joe] Biden’s approaches failed. Isolation attempts failed. Sanctions failed. Dialogue, respect, understanding each other, problem-solving to find [a] long-term solution is the way.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also added his voice to the ways in which the West has failed to bring Russia to its knees. He spoke in fresh comments on the drive to dismantle Russia: “More recently, facts have been cited, which said that some fringe figures in the West are still planning to split the Russian Federation into various regions.”

He continued as cited in TASS: “It amazes me that the West cannot draw conclusions from centuries of history in the context of its repeated attempts to rein in, subjugate, and punish Russia.”

Commenting on events in China has week, Lavrov described that merely a joint photo of Putin, Modi, and Xi unleashed “anger and frenzy among some Western leaders, who called this photo a challenge to the rules-based world order.”

Kirill Dmitriev: ex-Goldman banker who became Vladimir Putin’s dealmaker. Kremlin pool/Alamy

The top diplomat concluded, “After the start of the special military operation, there were predictions that Russia would collapse, fall into complete isolation, and the country and its leadership would turn into pariahs, but statistics from Western banks, including the World Bank, show that Russia has become the fourth-largest economy in the world after the United States, China, and India by purchasing power parity, and Europe’s top economy by this indicator.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 13:40

Appeals Court Upholds E. Jean Carroll’s $83.3 Million Judgment Against Trump

0
Appeals Court Upholds E. Jean Carroll’s $83.3 Million Judgment Against Trump

Via Headline USA,

A federal appeals court has upheld a civil jury’s finding that President Donald Trump must pay $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll for his repeated social media attacks against the longtime advice columnist after she accused him of sexual assault – even though a jury ruled that she lied about her rape allegations.

Carroll, whose advice column ran in the women’s magazine Elle from 1993 to 2019, has reportedly accused at least six prior men of raping her, including former CBS President Les Moonves.

Her bizarre social-media history also included posts making light of sexual trauma and even asking her followers if they found Trump sexually attractive.

Trump was prevented from submitting that evidence in his trial.

Despite her dubious track record, on Monday the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump’s appeal of the defamation award, finding that the “jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable.”

Trump had argued that he should not have to pay the sum as a result of a Supreme Court decision expanding presidential immunity.

His lawyers had asked for a new trial.

A civil jury in Manhattan issued the $88.3 million award last year following a trial that centered on Trump’s repeated social media attacks against Carroll over her claims that he sexually assaulted her in a Manhattan department store in 1996.

That award followed a separate trial, in which Trump was found liable for sexually abusing Carroll and ordered to pay $5 million.

That award was upheld by an appeals court last December.

In a memoir, and again at a 2023 trial, Carroll described how a chance encounter with Trump at Bergdorf Goodman’s Fifth Avenue in 1996 started with the two flirting as they shopped, then ended with a violent struggle inside a dressing room.

Carroll said Trump slammed her against a dressing room wall, pulled down her tights and forced himself on her.

A jury found Trump liable for sexual assault, but concluded he hadn’t committed rape, as defined under New York law.

Trump repeatedly denied that the encounter took place and accused Carroll of making it up to help sell her book.

He also said that Carroll was “not my type.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 13:20

GM CEO Mary Barra Sells 40% Of Stock As EV Slowdown Pauses Cadillac Lyriq, Vistiq Production 

0
GM CEO Mary Barra Sells 40% Of Stock As EV Slowdown Pauses Cadillac Lyriq, Vistiq Production 

A General Motors spokesperson confirmed to the Detroit Free Press that CEO Mary Barra sold 994,863 shares last month, valued at roughly $35.4 million. The sale accounted for 40% of Barra’s personal stake in the struggling legacy automaker, which is facing a slowdown in electric vehicle sales.

Barra’s fire sale, one of her largest ever, included shares linked to performance rewards dating back to 2011, plus a wind-down of her estate-planning trust. It should be noted that these sales occurred under her 10B5-1 plan. 

Here’s the breakdown (view Form 4 here) of the selling:

  • Sold 297,000 shares at an average price of $58.24, making up to roughly $17.3 million.

  • Sold 235,000 in money options at a strike price of $39, adding up to roughly $4.5 million.

  • Sold 375,024 in the money options with a strike price of $35.49, adding up to roughly $8.5 million.

  • Sold 87,839 shares from the annuity trust priced at $58.13, making roughly $5.1 million.

The Detroit Free Press cited Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, who said Barra’s stock sale should not be viewed as alarming. 

We are not concerned about this, and it’s about shares that hit some triggers,” Ives said, adding, “Barra remains a key part of the GM’s success, and we do not view this as a needle mover.”

Barra’s selling raises a new question: What does that say about GM’s future?

Bloomberg data shows that Barra’s stock sales began in the summer of 2024 and have continued ever since, reducing her total position to 2018 levels. Barra became CEO in January 2014.  

The selling comes as the Detroit Free Press announced in recent days that GM’s Spring Hill Assembly plant in Tennessee will experience several weeks of downtime. The plant makes the Cadillac Lyriq SUV and Vistiq. 

Additionally, GM’s Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City, Kansas, and its CAMI Assembly Plant line in Ingersoll, Ontario, are adjusting production plans.

“General Motors is making strategic production adjustments in alignment with expected slower EV industry growth and customer demand by leveraging our flexible ICE and EV manufacturing footprint,” GM spokesman Kevin Kelly told Detroit Free Press last week. 

Sales are slowing.

Only time will tell what 17 months of selling stock means for the future of GM’s leadership.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 13:00

French Govt Collapses As PM Loses Confidence Vote, To Resign Tomorrow

0
French Govt Collapses As PM Loses Confidence Vote, To Resign Tomorrow

Update (1300ET): As we previewed and expected, French PM Francois Bayrou, the fourth prime minister in just 20 months, became the latest to depart having failed to get sufficient support to push a budget through parliament as 194 voted for him, 364 against.

Bayrou is reportedly going to submit his resignation to Macron early Tuesday, according to a government course.

Macron has limited options to steer France out of this crisis, according to PoliticoEU.

He is reportedly leaning toward appointing another prime minister — the fifth since January 2024 — but a new premier would face the same intractable parliament.

So too would a technical government made up of civil servants.

Another snap election looks unappetizing, though, as it could easily deliver another hung parliament.

In an extreme scenario, Macron could even resign, but that’s highly unlikely given his past statements.

Macron’s office hasn’t said whether he will speak tonight.

The EURUSD dipped very modestly on the news but remains higher on the day…

*  *  *

Prime Minister Francois Bayrou’s government will likely fall Monday, a victim of his push to chip away at France’s massive debt load.  The premier called the vote to rally lawmaker support for his plan to narrow France’s 2026 deficit to 4.6% of economic output from an expected 5.4% this year. That plan includes €44 billion ($51.6 billion) of spending cuts and tax hikes. He also floated an unpopular proposal to cut two public holidays as a way to reduce costs in Europe’s second-largest economy.  France’s fiscal deficit is now the widest in the euro area. Debt is rising by €5,000 ($5,840) a second, and the cost of servicing it is set to hit €75 billion next year, according to the government.

His plan may have backfired, however, as opposition parties in the National Assembly have mobilized against Bayrou’s minority government.

“There are moments when we need a rude shock,” Bayrou told France 5 television on Saturday. “There’s never been a situation as blindingly clear as this one.”

Bayrou will make a policy speech starting at 3 p.m. Paris time, followed by interventions by the political groups in the National Assembly.

The vote will take place in the evening, with the result expected between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. (1400-1500ET)

Below is a full primer of what to expect, courtesy of Newsquawk

VOTE

  • French PM Bayrou called a confidence vote in order to get support for his fiscal plans. The vote is scheduled for Monday, September 8th – timing TBC.
  • As it stands, Bayrou is expected to lose the vote. There was some chance of his plans passing, though it would have required the support of at least one of the parties in opposition, as Bayrou’s government commands 210/577 Lower House seats, shy of the 289 majority figure.
  • To obtain 289, Bayrou would have needed to court either National Rally (RN) or a minimum of two parties from the Left. Note, the actual threshold to remain may be less than 289, as officials who abstain are removed from the calculation i.e. the majority of votes cast determines the outcome.
  • Parties on the Left have made clear that they will not be backing Bayrou; most pertinently, Socialist Party (PS/SOC) head Faure told Le Monde it would be “inconceivable’ for them to back Bayrou’s measures. Bayrou met with the Socialists on September 4th, but no breakthrough has been reported from this.
  • At the other end of the spectrum, RN President Bardella said “the miracle did not happen” in talks between Le Pen and Bayrou, remarking that the PM’s fiscal plan crosses some RN red lines and they do not have confidence in the government.
  • Overall, Bayrou’s failure to court support of the Left and/or Right means, barring an 11th hour change, that he will lose the confidence motion and Bayrou will have almost no choice but to resign.

TIMINGS

  • In terms of the timing, Politico reports that PM Bayrou will speak in the National Assembly at 14:00BST/09:00ET to deliver a policy statement. Thereafter, each of the political groups will have the opportunity to speak and the PM can in turn respond to questions from the officials.
  • Thereafter, the statement and responses by Bayrou will be subject to a confidence vote. The verdict of this, Politico estimates, will not be known until 18:00BST/13:00ET at the earliest.
  • Following the vote, and assuming Bayrou loses the confidence motion, he submits his resignation to President Macron, who then dictates the next steps.

OUTCOMES

  • There are a handful of potential scenarios ahead. 1) Bayrou wins the vote and pushes his reform plans through (very unlikely). 2) Bayrou loses, resigns and a new PM is appointed as part of the existing, or more likely an expanded coalition (possible). 3) Bayrou loses, resigns and a new PM cannot be agreed upon by the current parliament, causing President Macron to dissolve the Lower House and call new elections (possible). 4) Bayrou loses, either two or three occurs and the political instability continues, or three occurs and National Rally emerges victorious; at which point, President Macron could elect to resign (Macron cannot run for another consecutive term).
    • 1) Very slim chance of occurring, the market would likely see immediate relief from the surprise support for and progress on required fiscal reform. However, the French political landscape remains fractured so any relief may, ultimately, prove fleeting if the situation deteriorates once again in the weeks/months following.
    • 2) President Macron could appoint a new PM. However, any appointee would have the same issues Bayrou and Barnier before him, who faced a fractured political landscape, meaning this would be another sticking plaster rather than a lasting fix. One of the contenders for this could be current Finance Minister Lombard who, to the FT, outlined that Bayrou’s fall would necessitate concessions to the Left to secure broader support for reform. However, this feeler to the Socialist Party (PS) has already run into opposition from The Republicans (LR) as the right-leaning gov’t coalition member has made clear they will not work with PS.
    • 3) Fresh legislative elections could be called by President Macron. However, the polling situation has not moved in Macron’s favour since the 2024 election, as his Ensemble party has slipped by 21% of the vote share to c. 15% while RN and allies have been steady at around 32-33% (prev. 29%). Overall, the French system means an outright victory is very unlikely and as such the fractured political landscape would likely continue, with Macron running the risk of being President to a National Rally PM, likely Bardella.
    • 4) Macron has made clear that he has no intention of resigning ahead of his term ending around April 2027. Macron cannot seek a third consecutive term, though he could run again in 2032 or later, if he wished. If Macron stepped down, polling points to RN’s Bardella (Le Pen cannot run between 2025-2030 due to embezzlement, though she is planning to appeal this in the event of a Presidential election being called) securing victory in the first round with around 30% of the vote. Though, it is much less clear how he would fare in a second round vs Edouard Philippe, with polls for that round near-enough tied.
  • Note. Macron is reportedly seeking to avoid legislative elections, according to Bloomberg. The President believes that elections would result in another fractured political situation (outlined in scenario 3 above). Instead, Macron wishes to appoint a PM who could hold together the centrist bloc and court support from the Left, i.e scenario 2 and potentially a direct reference to someone like Lombard. However, the source makes clear that Macron is not ruling out legislative elections.
  • One final point of consideration are the strikes scheduled for September 10th, as there has been some talk of Macron potentially waiting until after the strikes pass before he announces his candidate to replace Bayrou.

MARKET REACTION

  • Following the announcement of the confidence vote, French banks and bonds have been under pressure.
  • Emphasis has been on the moves in French yields with respect to European peers, particularly the OAT-Bund 10yr yield spread. Following the announcement, this peaked at 82.19bps, shy of the YTD high of 88bps and then the 2024 90bps peak.
  • Spreads have been gradually widening as we count down to the vote, though still shy of the mentioned YTD peak. Jefferies forecasts the spread to get towards 90bps into the vote and then, if Bayrou loses as expected, highlights a risk of an extension to 100bps if it results in fresh legislative elections. Note, the desk describes this as an attractive entry point as Presidential elections remain unlikely (Macron continues to make clear that he will not call for early Presidential elections).
  • On spreads, ECB’s Lagarde has said they are attentive to the French movements but made clear that France is not in a situation which would require intervention.

RATING AGENCIES

  • Given the tricky fiscal situation France is in, and the necessity for significant reform in order to bring key measures in-line with EU rules, rating agency updates have and continue to be keenly watched regarding France.
  • Reviews are due as follows: Fitch (AA-, negative) 12th September, DBRS (AA, negative) 19th September, Scope (AA-, Stable) 26th September, Moody’s (Aa3, Stable) 24th October, S&P (AA-, Negative) 28th November.
  • If Fitch were to downgrade on the 12th, after the vote, then this would push French assets close to the point at which some funds would be forced to divest. Fitch last updated on March 14th, highlighting high levels of debt and a poor record of fiscal consolidation as points of weakness, adding the negative outlook is reflective of significant fiscal risks. While the confidence vote raises the odds of a downgrade, it is worth noting that Fitch in March expected new elections to occur in H2-2025, so it remains to be seen how much of this has already been ‘priced’ by the agency.
  • However, on the flip side, the agency highlighted a “failure to implement a medium-term fiscal consolidation plan…” as a factor that could spur negative rating action.
  • As a reminder, the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact requires member nations to have deficits equal/less than 3% of GDP and public debt to a maximum of 60% of GDP; France comes in at around 5.8% and over 100% respectively. Though, the Commission has been and is expected to continue to be flexible with the rules, focusing primarily on the medium-term trajectory and credibility of fiscal plans.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT FALLS?

For Bayrou to survive, he needs to get the approval of a majority of those votes cast. Given that the groups that support the government represent just 210 seats out of 574 currently occupied (there are three vacant seats at the moment), Bayrou would need well over 100 abstentions in order to survive, assuming all members of those parties that support the government vote in his favor.

If Bayrou loses the vote, Macron’s options include naming a new premier or dissolving the lower house and calling early elections, which aides have said is not in the plans for now. Macron has repeatedly insisted he wouldn’t resign, as some parties have demanded.

If Macron were to name a new prime minister, it would leave unanswered the question of how the government passes an unpopular budget, which brought down the previous premier, Michel Barnier, last year. The context underscores the sudden return of France’s fiscal concerns to the forefront of investors’ attention at a time when European neighbors such as Italy are making comparative progress in taming deficits.

As Bloomberg’s Michael Msika and Julien Ponthus detail below, French assets are set for long-lasting underperformance as the country’s unstable politics keep investors at bay.

Since Prime Minister François Bayrou called a vote of confidence on Aug. 25, the CAC 40 Index has fallen more than a broad European stock benchmark. The extra yield investors demand to hold French 10-year government bonds over German bunds has surged. Even so, French assets aren’t yet pricing the instability that can unfold over the coming weeks or months.

“We’re not expecting for now a sudden tipping point by which bonds and stocks would suddenly collapse,” says Raphael Thuin, head of capital markets strategies at Tikehau Capital.

“It’s rather about pricing a potentially progressive and long-lasting decline. The feedback we get from our clients is that they’re getting used to the idea that there’s a durable risk premium being attached to France.”

France’s inability to fix its public finances has led to three governments in little more than a year, and there’s no sign that a fourth will fare any better.

So investors may be left facing another deadlock over the budget for months to come, the prospect of another snap parliamentary election and even persistent calls for President Emmanuel Macron to resign.

“The French equity market may be too optimistic about the political outcomes,” say Citi strategists led by Beata Manthey, who downgraded the country’s stocks to neutral at the end of August.

“Potential election would in our view imply about 5% lower equity market valuations. Combined with the fact that French equities tend to be more volatile than peers’ around elections, this could be a reason to expect additional choppiness.”

While the CAC 40 generates only 20% of revenues domestically, investors have been applying a discount to the benchmark since the snap elections last year and may continue to stay away on a relative basis. Sectors with the highest levels of local revenue reliance are telecoms, financials, and real estate, while technology, materials and health care are more internationally facing.

Banks are at the forefront of investor worries, given their exposure to government bonds.

Citi analysts note that key concerns include a higher cost of equity, increased funding costs and potential populist measures, but say that these fears remain “overblown” for now.

Defense stocks should also be watched, they add. While French defense spending will most likely trend upward in 2025 and 2026, things might become more difficult in the medium term out to 2030.

Construction and logistics companies like Vinci and Eiffage, residential real-estate developer Nexity and nursing-home operators Emeis and Clariane have also suffered recent bouts of volatility.

The discount on French assets is likely to be validated in the event of Bayrou’s ouster, because any new government will have to dial back his proposed budget cuts. The premier failed to find a majority to back his plan for €44 billion of spending reductions and tax hikes, with the goal of narrowing France’s 2026 deficit to 4.6% of economic output from an expected 5.4% this year.

The yield on France’s 10-year government bond climbed to almost 3.6%, threatening to surpass that of Italy, after Bayrou called the vote, though it has since receded to about 3.44%.

The yield premium on French bonds over bunds has risen to almost 80 basis points, roughly 10 basis points higher than prior to Bayrou’s political gamble.

Tension in the bond markets threatens to spill over to stocks, because higher benchmark yields mean higher borrowing costs, especially for smaller, indebted companies, says Thomas Helaine, head of equity sales at TP ICAP Europe.

That in return reduces the money available for capital spending and growth, he said, and as a result, investors are looking to other markets.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 13:00

Why Diversification Is Failing In The Age Of Passive Investing

0
Why Diversification Is Failing In The Age Of Passive Investing

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Diversification has been the backbone of “buy and hold” strategies for the last few decades. It was a boon to financial advisors who couldn’t actively manage portfolios, and it created a massive Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) industry that allowed for even further simplification of investing. The message was basic: “Buy a basket of assets, dollar cost average, and given enough time, you will grow your wealth.”

But where did that marketing revolution come from? Based on the premise of index investing, it created massive firms like Vanguard, Fidelity, BlackRock, and others. For that answer, we need to go back in time to 1952. Then, Harry Markowitz revolutionized investment strategy with his portfolio choice theory. His work, for which he received a Nobel Prize, gave rise to what we now know as Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), which proposed that the best portfolios don’t focus on individual securities but on how groups of assets interact.

The goal was to combine uncorrelated assets to reduce overall volatility while optimizing returns. This model encouraged investors to spread risk through diversification. Critically, it assumes that assets wouldn’t all move together in times of stress. This theory served as the bedrock of portfolio construction for decades, especially for institutional investors. The strategy worked well before the turn of the century, when sectors rotated leadership and assets moved independently based on distinct economic drivers. Back then, diversification across asset classes, sectors, and geographies was a reliable way to reduce portfolio risk.

However, over the last 15 years, following the financial crisis, the investing environment has changed. Monetary and fiscal interventions, global central bank interest rate policies, the maturity of algorithmic and computerized trading strategies, and concentration have reduced diversification’s value. As shown, any portfolio “diversified” between large, mid, and small-cap stocks, international and emerging markets, real estate, and gold, has significantly underperformed being invested solely in the S&P 500 index. Furthermore, in times of crisis, like 2020, the diversification failed to protect investors from the downturn as correlations went to “1.”

The reality is that markets have changed.

The assumptions that supported MPT, uncorrelated assets, stable relationships, and rational price behavior, have eroded. Central banks have injected liquidity, distorted yields, and suppressed volatility. Meanwhile, passive investing has reshaped how money flows into stocks.

The basic premise of diversification is under pressure from structural shifts that Markowitz could not have anticipated.

Passive Investing’s Impact on Market Structure

Passive investing has grown from a niche strategy into the dominant force in equity markets. Index funds and ETFs now account for over half of U.S. equity ownership. These vehicles allocate capital based on market capitalization, not valuation, fundamentals, or business quality. As more money flows into these funds, the largest companies receive the lion’s share of new capital. That’s created a powerful feedback loop, where price drives flows, and flows drive price.

This shift has radically changed the effectiveness of diversification. Investors who think they’re diversified across multiple ETFs often have overlapping exposure to the same few mega-cap names. For example, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia are top holdings in technology ETFs, dividend funds, and large-cap growth portfolios. In the U.S., there are roughly 4000 ETFs, and 771, approximately 20%, own Apple. Therefore, if you own an S&P index fund, a Nasdaq index ETF, and a technology-focused ETF, you have multiple holdings of the same companies. This overlap increases portfolio risk and concentration. What looks like diversification is often just duplicated exposure dressed up as balance.

As noted in “The Bull Market Is Alive And Well,” the top 10 stocks have a hefty weighting in the S&P 500 index, which absorbs $0.36 of every dollar invested. Furthermore, the top 10 stocks impact the S&P 500 index the same as the bottom 440 stocks combined.

Furthermore, the top ten stocks in the S&P 500 now account for more than 70 percent of the index’s return. These names dominate the performance of most portfolios, even those that appear broad on the surface. As passive flows continue to distort market mechanics, the ability of traditional diversification to reduce risk has declined. Assets that once behaved independently now rise and fall together, leaving portfolios more vulnerable when markets correct.

But that is where we find the demise of Modern Portfolio Theory, which assumes that asset classes will not move in perfect unison. Historically, this was true. Sector correlations typically ranged between 0.3 and 0.6, allowing diversification to smooth out returns. When one part of the market fell, others could rise or stay flat. That dynamic gave portfolios resilience. But today, those correlations are breaking down. During market stress, correlations spike as high as 0.9. Nearly every asset class sells off together, erasing the protective benefit of diversification.

This shift is driven by the rise of passive ownership, which has increased the linkage between stocks, sectors, and even asset classes. Academic research from INSEAD and UC Irvine confirms that companies with high passive ownership become more volatile and exhibit stronger co-movement, especially during sell-offs. Central bank interventions have added another layer of distortion by suppressing price discovery and inflating asset prices indiscriminately. Liquidity flows, not fundamentals, now drive much of market behavior.

Even portfolios designed to be “all-weather” or “risk-parity” have failed to deliver protection during sharp downturns. Diversification fails when everything is tied to the same flows and narratives. The illusion of balance breaks down exactly when it is most needed. This environment has made it harder to rely on traditional asset allocation strategies.

Therefore, given this change to market dynamics, investors must now think differently about managing risk.

New Approaches to Diversification in a Concentrated Market

Yes, diversification still matters. In fact, it matters more now than ever. While the traditional benefits of diversification have weakened due to high correlations and market concentration, the need to reduce risk remains unchanged. The objective is not to eliminate volatility, but to manage it intelligently. That means ensuring portfolios can withstand market downturns while still participating in upside when leadership changes or new trends emerge.

Surface-level diversification is no longer enough in a market increasingly driven by passive flows and dominated by a few mega-cap names. Owning multiple funds or asset classes does not guarantee protection if the underlying exposures overlap. Investors must go deeper and look beyond labels and into the actual drivers of risk and return. Here are seven strategies to help achieve more effective diversification in today’s environment:

  1. Limit Overlap Across Holdings: To reduce concentration risk in your portfolio, ensure you limit duplicate positions across your funds.

  2. Prioritize High-Conviction, Quality Holdings: Reduce broad exposure in favor of companies with consistent earnings, low debt, and durable competitive advantages. Quality stocks tend to be more resilient across market cycles.

  3. Allocate by Investment Factors, Not Just Sectors: Diversify based on factors like value, size, momentum, and low volatility. These traits respond differently to economic conditions, creating more effective diversification than sector spreads alone.

  4. Don’t Forget About Cash: When uncertain markets arrive, remember the value of cash as a hedge against volatility risk.

  5. Use Active Management Where It Adds Value: Tactical funds or active managers can navigate around crowded trades and avoid the systematic exposures built into passive indexes.

  6. Incorporate Alternative Allocation Models: Explore risk-based strategies like Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP), which adapt to changing correlations and distribute risk more evenly than traditional mean-variance approaches.

  7. Monitor Correlations Over Time: Correlations are dynamic, especially in periods of stress. Review your portfolio regularly to ensure your holdings are not moving in lockstep when it matters most.

Each of these steps is designed to restore the core purpose of diversification: risk control without sacrificing the opportunity for return.

In a market where broad ownership no longer guarantees safety, discipline, and deeper analysis make the difference.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 12:40

“A Clear Defeat”: Argentina Bonds, Peso Plunge After Milei Routed In Buenos Aires Polls

0
“A Clear Defeat”: Argentina Bonds, Peso Plunge After Milei Routed In Buenos Aires Polls

Argentina’s President Javier Milei suffered a heavy defeat in Buenos Aires province, where the Peronist Fuerza Patria coalition won 47% of the vote against his Libertad Avanza’s 34%, according to FT.

Pre-election forecasts had predicted a closer contest, which Milei had hoped would boost momentum for the October 26 midterms.

“Buenos Aires province is traditionally very Peronist, but this margin is even worse than expected,” said Alberto Ades of NWI Management. He warned markets would react with weaker bonds, equities, and higher country risk.

FT writes that the setback comes amid Milei’s struggles in Congress, where his veto was recently overturned, and a corruption scandal involving leaked recordings and alleged kickbacks linked to his sister Karina. His approval has dropped below 40%.

“Without any doubt, today we suffered a clear defeat,” Milei conceded. “But the economic course for which we were elected will not change. We will continue to defend fiscal balance tooth and nail.”

Analyst Ana Iparraguirre said, “This result was primarily a negative message to Milei’s government,” warning financial turbulence could deepen voter discontent.

Markets are already stressed: short-term dollar bonds have fallen 15% since July, equities 34%, and debt spreads widened nearly 2 points to 9%. To defend the peso, Milei has raised rates, tightened reserves, and sold dollars, but economists fear recession.

“The resounding defeat of President Javier Milei’s La Libertad Avanza in the Province of Buenos Aires election will likely confirm the worst of market fears and unleash an adverse feedback loop of negative price action, unpleasant policy moves, and more downbeat expectations heading into October’s national mid-terms,” Bloomberg economist Jimena Zuniga said.

“The government engineered a sharp recession with high rates to defend the peso, but Buenos Aires voters are saying jobs matter more than squeezing out the last bit of inflation,” said Walter Stoeppelwerth of Grit Capital.

Despite this blow, polls still predict Milei’s coalition will gain seats in Congress, though it holds less than 15% in either chamber. The result, however, bolsters Peronist governor Axel Kicillof, a rising figure in the opposition.

The peso plunged 7% to 1,450 per US dollar, near the upper limit of its trading band, at the start of local trading.

Dollar notes due 2035, among the most traded, slid 5.56 cents to 56.09, pushing yields to 12.6% and leading losses across emerging markets.

“This was Peronism’s bastion. The national election will be different,” said Fernando Marengo of Blacktoro. “The focus has to shift to building agreements — the reforms that could be done by decree are done.”

Argentina’s sovereign bonds tumbled after the defeat in Buenos Aires, according to Bloomberg.

Investors had braced for a selloff if Milei lost by more than five points; instead, the 14-point margin magnified concerns ahead of October’s midterms.

Morgan Stanley swiftly closed its week-old buy call on Argentine assets, warning that Sunday’s outcome increases the risk of a “downside scenario in which the market questions the likelihood of continued reforms, and uncertainty rises around the future external financing sources,” according to economist Fernando Sedano and strategist Simon Waever.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 10:00

Key Events This Week: CPI, Payrolls Revisions, France Vote Of Confidence, ECB

0
Key Events This Week: CPI, Payrolls Revisions, France Vote Of Confidence, ECB

Usually the post-payrolls week is quieter but not this time, as we get another bumper week of events as we build to next week’s FOMC. Although the Fed is now on its media blackout, Wednesday’s PPI and especially Thursday’s CPI will shape pricing ahead of that (note that the traditional order of CPI before PPI is flipped this week), with all eyes still focused on the tariff impact. 28bps of cuts are now priced in for the next meeting, so a quarter-point cut is fully priced but without much being priced in for a 50bps move (that will change after tomorrow’s negative benchmark revision). DB economists believe you’d need to see pretty weak inflation this week to get that. We preview that US inflation data below but before we do the main highlights for the rest of the week are: the French confidence vote in the National Assembly, German industrial production and the New York Fed’s inflation expectations today; the preliminary annual benchmark revisions by the US BLS for payrolls tomorrow; Chinese inflation, the State of the Union address by European Commission President von der Leyen, and a 10yr UST auction on Wednesday; the ECB decision and a 30yr UST auction on Thursday; and finally on Friday there’s the  University of Michigan survey. 

We’ll go through a few of these events now and review Friday’s payrolls and its impact below. But let’s first take a look at what’s expected in Thursday’s US CPI. In their preview. DB’s US economists expect monthly headline CPI to rise to +0.36% in August, which would be the strongest monthly print since January. That’s partly because of their forecast for a +1.7% increase in seasonally adjusted gas prices, along with some positive payback in food-at-home prices. At the same time, they think core CPI will be a little weaker at +0.32%, although that would still be in line with the six-month high we had last month. If that’s correct, then that would lift the year-on-year headline number by two-tenths to +2.9%, with core edging up a little but still rounding to +3.1%, the same as last month. Of course, the focus will very much be on the continued impact of the tariffs in core goods categories, and we know these are still filtering through, given several rates like the 50% on copper only came into force last month.

In terms of the implications for the Fed, the jobs report on Friday has seen the tide turn to increasing concern about tepid employment growth rather than permanently above-target inflation. That report showed nonfarm payrolls up just +22k (down from +79k in July and clearly beneath the +75k print expected). Moreover, there were another -21k of downward revisions to the previous two months, which was well below the huge -258k revisions in the previous report, but still the 6th time in the last 7 months that the revisions had been negative. So that meant the unemployment rate moved up a tenth to 4.3%, the highest since October 2021. And the broader U6 measure (which includes underemployed and marginally attached workers) moved up to 8.1%, again the highest since October 2021. As it stands, the latest revisions mean that June this year has a -13k print, which is the first negative month since December 2020. It also marks an end to the second-longest streak of consecutive positive payroll prints in data back to 1939. The one caveat they discuss around the weak data is that the slide in payrolls does look similar to that seen between June and August last year even if there is evidence of labor market weakness in the numbers.

Overall, they don’t view the report as soft enough to push the FOMC towards a larger-than-usual 50bp cut next week, partly because the median dot in June was in line with two cuts and an unemployment rate at 4.5% by year-end. So nothing out of the ordinary yet relative to this. However, as we warned two weeks ago, keep an eye out for the preliminary BLS annual benchmark revisions tomorrow for another rewrite of history. These only impact the period to March so it won’t have anything about the most recent five months. But there are likely to be downward revisions of as much as 50-60k per month over the year according to our economists, based on the survey linked to the revisions calculations. Bessent nodded to this sort of number yesterday in a press interview.

Elsewhere, we see what is likely to be a low-key ECB decision on Thursday. DB economists expect them to keep the deposit rate on hold at 2% and think the ECB has reached its terminal rate in this cycle.

More importantly in Europe is today’s confidence vote in France. Proceedings start at 3pm local time with the vote results likely to be known after 5pm CET. That’s likely to see a defeat for Prime Minister Bayrou’s minority government, but most interesting is what happens next. President Macron is expected to nominate a new PM that could achieve a majority to pass the budget. This would probably require the backing of the center-left Socialists as the right-wing populist National Rally has called for snap parliamentary elections to be held. There are also general strikes called in France for September 10 and September 18, and Politico reported over the weekend that Macron is aiming to have Bayrou’s replacement lined up before the second one of these. At the start of last week, France’s fiscal situation was a real pressing issue for markets, along with the UK gilt market selloff, but the US bond rally has taken some of the sting out of this. Nevertheless, both countries remain in a precarious situation if global rates turn again.

Speaking of politics, Japan’s PM Ishiba announced over the weekend that he will step down, after several weeks of speculation after the poor summer election results. The leadership race will now take place and likely take 2-3 weeks, although the new LDP leader will need some support from opposition parties to become PM given LDP-Komeito have lost their majority. A key issue at stake is the direction of monetary policy, and the two front runners seem to be Koizumi and Takaichi with the former more likely to coincide with higher Japanese rates. That’s contributed to a weaker Japanese yen overnight, which has fallen by -0.48% against the US Dollar to 148.15 per dollar. Meanwhile, yields are fairly stable, and the Nikkei (+1.33%) is closing back on its record high this morning after there were decent upward revisions to Japan’s growth data. It showed the economy growing at an annualised +2.2% rate in Q2, having initially pointed to a +1.0% rate. So that means the economy has expanded for 5 consecutive quarters now, the longest run since 2016-18.

Courtesy of DB, here is a day-by-day calendar of events

Monday September 8

  • Data: US August NY Fed 1-yr inflation expectations, July consumer credit, China August trade balance, Japan August Economy Watchers survey, bank lending, July BoP current account balance, BoP trade balance, Germany July industrial production, trade balance
  • Central banks : ECB’s Villeroy speaks
  • Other: France confidence vote, Norway parliamentary election

Tuesday September 9

  • Data: US August NFIB small business optimism, Japan August M2, M3, machine tool orders, France July industrial production
  • Central banks: ECB’s Nagel and Villeroy speak, BoE’s Breeden speaks
  • Earnings: Oracle, Synopsis
  • Auctions: US 3-yr Notes ($58bn)

Wednesday September 10

  • Data: US August PPI, July wholesale trade sales, China August CPI, PPI, Italy July industrial production, Sweden July GDP indicator, Denmark and Norway August CPI
  • Earnings: Inditex
  • Auctions: US 10-yr Notes (reopening, $39bn)
  • Other: State of the Union address by the European Commission President von der Leyen

Thursday September 11

  • Data: US August CPI, federal budget balance, Q2 household change in net worth, initial jobless claims, UK August RICS house price balance, Japan August PPI, Germany July current account balance
  • Central banks: ECB decision
  • Earnings: Adobe, Kroger
  • Auctions: US 30-yr Bonds (reopening, $22bn)

Friday September 12

  • Data: US September University of Michigan survey, UK July monthly GDP, Japan July capacity utilisation, Italy Q2 unemployment rate, Canada July building permits, Q2 capacity utilisation rate
  • Central banks: ECB’s Rehn, Kocher and Nagel speak, BoE’s inflation attitudes survey

Finally, looking at just the US, the key economic data releases this week are the CPI report on Thursday and the University of Michigan report on Friday. Fed officials are not expected to comment on monetary policy this week, reflecting the blackout period ahead of the September FOMC meeting.

Monday, September 8 

  • 11:00 AM New York Fed 1-year inflation expectations, August (last 3.1%) 

Tuesday, September 9 

  • 06:00 AM NFIB small business optimism, August (consensus 100.5, last 100.3)
  • 10:00 AM BLS releases preliminary annual payrolls benchmark revision: The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will publish a preliminary estimate of the benchmark revision to the level of nonfarm payrolls for March 2025. The final benchmark revision will be issued and incorporated into nonfarm payrolls alongside the January 2026 employment report in February 2026. Based on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW)—the key source data for the annual benchmark revision—a large downward revision seems likely; we estimate on the order of 550-950k (or a 45-80k downward revision to monthly payroll growth over April 2024-March 2025). However, we believe next week’s estimate could revise payroll growth down by as much as 400k too much.

Wednesday, September 10 

  • 08:30 AM PPI final demand, August (GS +0.2%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.9%); PPI ex-food and energy, August (GS +0.3%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.9%); PPI ex-food, energy, and trade, August (GS +0.3%, consensus NA, last +0.6%)

Thursday, September 11 

  • 08:30 AM CPI (MoM), August (GS +0.37%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.2%); Core CPI (MoM), August (GS +0.36%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.3%); CPI (YoY), August (GS +2.90%, consensus +2.9%, last +2.70%); Core CPI (YoY), August (GS +3.13%, consensus +3.1%, last +3.06%): We estimate a 0.36% increase in August core CPI (month-over-month SA), which would leave the year-over-year rate unchanged at 3.1% on a rounded basis. Our forecast reflects increases in used car prices (+1.2%) reflecting an increase in auction prices, new car prices (+0.2%) reflecting a decline in dealer incentives, and the car insurance category (+0.4%) based on premiums in our online dataset. We forecast an increase in airfares in August (+3%), reflecting a boost from seasonal distortions and an increase in underlying airfares based on our equity analysts’ tracking of online price data. We have penciled in upward pressure from tariffs on categories that are particularly exposed (such as communication, household furnishings, and recreation) worth +0.14pp on core inflation. We expect the shelter components to be roughly unchanged on net (primary rent +0.25%; OER +0.26%). We estimate a 0.37% rise in headline CPI, reflecting higher food prices (+0.35%) and energy (+0.6%) prices. Our forecast is consistent with a 0.29% increase in core PCE in August. We will update our core PCE forecast after the CPI is released.
  • 08:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended September 6 (GS 230k, consensus 234k, last 237k); Continuing jobless claims, week ended August 30 (consensus 1,950k, last 1,940k)

Friday, September 12 

  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, September preliminary (GS 57.4, consensus 58.0, last 58.2)
  • University of Michigan 5-10-year inflation expectations, September preliminary (GS 3.4%, consensus 3.5%, last 3.5%)

Source: DB, Goldman

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 09:50

White House Deputy Chief Of Staff: ‘Massive Scandal’ Uncovered In D.C. Crime Stats

0
White House Deputy Chief Of Staff: ‘Massive Scandal’ Uncovered In D.C. Crime Stats

Via American Greatness,

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller is warning that an ongoing Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into whether Washington D.C. officials manipulated crime statistics is in the process of uncovering a “massive scandal.”

At an Oval Office press conference, Miller told reporters that when the results of the investigation are finally that, “It will stun you,” adding, “Even though D.C. had the worst crime in America–honestly measured–it dramatically understated how bad it was.”

Miller said that DOJ investigators have uncovered evidence that crime data was manipulated to the point that some murders and homicides were falsely reported as accidents.

The White House Deputy Chief of Staff also assured reporters that the full extent of the manipulation “will be uncovered and it will all be brought to light.”

Miller told reporters that he’s had the opportunity to visit with police officers in the city who tell him that members of the public are going up to them and thanking them for finally being able to enjoy their parks and “walk freely at night without having to worry about being robbed or mugged.”

Last month, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) informed Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Chief Pamela Smith, in a letter, that his committee is “investigating disturbing allegations that DC crime data is inaccurate and intentionally manipulated.”

Comer told Smith that a whistleblower “with direct knowledge of internal MPD operations and crime data discussions” told his committee that “crime statistics were allegedly manipulated on a widespread basis and at the direction of senior MPD officials.”

In his letter to Smith, Comer notes, “The whistleblower stated this manipulation is accomplished by supervisors — with only a cursory understanding of the facts and circumstances of the crime — ignoring the judgement of patrol officers who actually interviewed witnesses and collected evidence by recommending reduced charges.”

MPD District 3 Commander Michael Pulliam, was reported last month to have been under investigation for allegedly manipulating crime statistics for his district, although Comer told Smith in his letter that, “Unfortunately, this practice does not appear to be isolated, nor is it a recent development.”

MPD data had shown violent crime decreases across all seven police districts, although D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said MPD leadership only found anomalies in data reporting in one district.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 09:20

SpaceX Buys $17 Billion In EchoStar Spectrum To Supercharge Starlink Direct-To-Cell

0
SpaceX Buys $17 Billion In EchoStar Spectrum To Supercharge Starlink Direct-To-Cell

Elon Musk’s SpaceX struck a deal with EchoStar Corporation for 50 MHz of exclusive U.S. spectrum and global MSS licenses, a move that supercharges its Starlink Direct to Cell service worldwide. 

“This agreement will enable us to develop and deploy our next-generation Starlink Direct to Cell constellation, which will be capable of providing broadband service to cell phones globally,” SpaceX wrote in a press release on Monday morning. 

Here’s the breakdown of the SpaceX–EchoStar spectrum deal:

  • SpaceX is acquiring 50 MHz of exclusive U.S. S-band spectrum (AWS-4 and PCS-H) plus global MSS licenses from EchoStar.

  • This spectrum will power next-generation Starlink Direct to Cell satellites, enabling higher bandwidth, optimized 5G protocols, and 100x more capacity than the first generation.

  • New satellites will be driven by custom SpaceX silicon and phased array antennas, supporting full 5G connectivity comparable to terrestrial LTE.

EchoStar wrote in a press release that SpaceX is paying $8.5 billion in cash and up to $8.5 billion in SpaceX stock for its AWS-4 and H-block spectrum licenses, adding that the proceeds will be used to “retire certain debt obligations and fund EchoStar’s continued operations and growth initiatives.” 

Shares of EchoStar jumped 24% in premarket trading and are up 193% year-to-date as of Friday’s close. Short interest stands at 12.37% of the float, or approximately 16.4 million shares, with a 6.1-day average trading volume to cover.

Additional color on Starlink Direct to Cell service:

  • Service began deployment in January 2024, with early texting and video calling demos on unmodified phones.

  • Now at 600+ satellites in orbit, the first-gen constellation provides 4G coverage across five continents, serving 6+ million users—the largest 4G footprint on Earth.

  • Operates at 360 km altitude, using regenerative architecture and laser links to integrate with the 8,000-satellite Starlink backbone.

Starlink operations:

  • Partnered with T-Mobile, Optus, Telstra, Rogers, KDDI, Kyivstar, and others for global coverage.

  • Provided life-saving emergency connectivity during U.S. hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, delivering 1.5 million+ connections and hundreds of emergency alerts.

  • Enabled rescues in remote areas.

In recent weeks, SpaceX’s Starship rocket deployed the first batch of mock Starlink satellites in space and tested new heat shield tiles on its plunge through Earth’s atmosphere, achieving new milestones in preparation to launch next-gen Direct to Cell satellites with EchoStar spectrum that will expand service, speeds, eliminate dead zones, and extend broadband and IoT connectivity to phones worldwide. 

Even though Musk has shown little interest in taking SpaceX public, rumors have circulated about a potential Starlink IPO.

Furthermore, whatever happened to Jeff Bezos’ rocket company and space internet company? 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/08/2025 – 08:40