65.7 F
Chicago
Monday, October 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 1141

Russia Is Not Targeting EU Or NATO States, Lavrov Tells UN

0
Russia Is Not Targeting EU Or NATO States, Lavrov Tells UN

Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov addressed the United Nations General Assembly in a wide-ranging speech on Saturday, wherein he warned of a “decisive response” to any “aggression” directed towards Moscow.

But he spent much of the speech debunking the notion that Russia is seeking to attack European Union or NATO states, days after Denmark claimed to be under assault by Russian-linked drone sabotage operations which have at times shut down major airport hubs.

“Threats of force against Russia, accused of practically planning an attack on the North Atlantic Alliance [Nato] and the European Union, are becoming increasingly common,” he said. “President Putin has repeatedly debunked such provocations.”

“Russia has never had and does not have such intentions, but any aggression against my country will be met with a decisive response,” Lavrov emphasized.

Via Sputnik 

But, he asserted, threats against Russia by the Western allies are becoming “increasingly common”. Much of his verbal attack was focused on the more hawkish European countries.

This was in contrast with this more positive tone regarding the Trump administration: “In the approaches of the current US administration, we see a desire not only to contribute to ways to realistically resolve the Ukrainian crisis, but also a desire to develop pragmatic cooperation without adopting an ideological stance,” he said.

To be expected, he saved his harshest attack for the Ukrainian government itself, at one point highlighting its persecution of Russian language and culture in the public sphere. Lavrov noted that even Arabic is not banned by Israel.

“Yet Russian is banned in Ukraine. I would remind you that Article 1 of the UN Charter calls for ‘respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion,’” he highlighted.

“The Kiev regime, which seized power in the unconstitutional coup organized by the West in 2014, has set a course to eliminate the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, to legislate the eradication of the Russian language across all spheres – education, culture, and the media. Ukraine is the only country in the world to legally ban the native language of nearly half of its population,” the top Russian diplomat said.

He declared that that Europe is “obsessed with the utopian goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia” and so remains silent on these severe human rights abuses.

“For this goal, the Ukrainian regime is permitted everything – including terrorist attacks against politicians and journalists, torture and extrajudicial executions, indiscriminate bombardment of civilian infrastructure, and reckless sabotage targeting nuclear power plants,” he underscored.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 15:45

This Is The Worst (But Funniest) Book Excerpt You’ll Ever Read

0
This Is The Worst (But Funniest) Book Excerpt You’ll Ever Read

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Kamala Harris Is hawking a book desperately attempting to blame everyone and anyone other than herself for her Presidential campaign being monumentally and historically awful.

Given how much of a low IQ individual she is you’d have thought she would’ve gotten someone else to write it for her, but judging by a newly released excerpt it appears she went at it alone armed only with a pen and a whole case of red wine.

In this sneak peak (which is real this time)  Kamala describes how she felt when sleepy dementia Joe Biden decided to wear a MAGA hat in front of the media.

“Joe was sharing a joke with some guys in MAGA hats. One of them took his hat off and offered it to Joe… He took it, [I thought] ‘don’t put it on.’ He put it on. Cameras clicked.”

“Within hours, the picture was all over. Joe Biden in a MAGA hat, with the caption, ‘Biden endorses Trump over Harris.’”

She refers to the incident as “the MAGA hat debacle,” and frames it as part of broader frustrations with Biden’s lack of support.

Please let the entire book be like this.

Of course there will be word salads, but at its core…

How will she describe the time Biden called all Trump supporters ‘garbage’?

Let’s take a wild stab…

“Don’t slander half of America [I thought] Then he said all Trump supporters were garbage. Within hours the video was all over with the caption ‘Biden calls Trump supporters ‘garbage.’”

Something like that, right.

Will Biden’s handlers strike back as previously promised?

Another excerpt concerning her refusal to appear on the Joe Rogan podcast was also recently released. 

It consists of a lot of words to just say ‘I wasn’t intellectually up to it and would’ve looked bad.’

Which is funny, because that’s exactly how Rogan described her at the time.

Her team knew it too, and that’s why they demanded editorial control and to limit the exchange to just 45 minutes. 

The book is called 107 Days, because that’s how long everyone had to endure her excruciating cackling before Trump won a massive landslide victory. 

 

It’s also the same amount of time that she managed to burn through one and a half billion dollars.

The title of the book is a suggestion that she didn’t have long enough to put together a winning strategy. But given she never even coherently explained one policy, one can only assume it would take her years.

What else do you think will be in her book? Will she finally answer the question ‘how are you different from Joe Biden?’

President Trump has saved taxpayers tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, by ending Secret Service protection for harris as she promotes the book.

Harris has managed to become even more unpopular since her massive loss with her net favorability rating dropping from -5 points in October 2024 to its current -13 points on a nationwide scale.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 15:10

Trump Authorizes ‘Full Force’ In Portland As Bondi Deploys Anti-Antifa Nationwide

0
Trump Authorizes ‘Full Force’ In Portland As Bondi Deploys Anti-Antifa Nationwide

The Trump administration has responded to recent attacks on US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by directing AG Pam Bondi to deploy DOJ agents to ICE facilities and “wherever” federal immigration officers are “under siege.”

This includes ordering Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to send US troops to Portland to ‘protect the city’ and ICE facilities from antifa and other “domestic terrorists.” 

The move follows Trump signing an executive order last week to formally designate antifa a domestic terrorist organization – which gives the US government a broad mandate to probe the anti-fascist movement’s operations, along with instances where an antifa member “provided material support.”

Bondi took to X to explain what’s going on; 

“I have witnessed the continued onslaught of violence perpetrated against ICE officers across our country. The Department of Justice will not stand idly by in the face of such lawlessness,” Bondi wrote. “At my direction, I am deploying DOJ agents to ICE facilities—and wherever ICE comes under siege—to safeguard federal agents, protect federal property, and immediately arrest all individuals engaged in any federal crime.” 

She continued:

Pursuant to President Trump’s recent executive action, I am also instructing the Joint Terrorism Task Forces across the country to disrupt and investigate all entities and individuals engaged in acts of domestic terrorism, including the repeated acts of violence and obstruction against federal agents. The Department of Justice will seek the most serious available charges against all participants in these criminal mobs, including conspiracy offenses, assault offenses, civil disorder offenses, and terrorism offenses. While these never-ending attacks are designed to break our will, they only strengthen our resolve to complete the work begun. To that end, I have directed the FBI, DEA, ATF, and USMS to accelerate our efforts alongside the Department of Homeland Security to locate, apprehend, detain, prosecute, and remove all illegal aliens present in our country. The rule of law will prevail.

Bondi’s post comes just days after a sniper attack at a Dallas ICE facility that killed two migrants and critically injured another.

Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, Bondi’s post, noting that “Assets mobilizing. This campaign of terrorism will be brought down.”

The latest attacks mark a continuation of political violence fueled by far-left activist groups – some funded by dark-money NGOs.

Some of these orgs are carrying out attacks on ICE agents and facilities nationwide. 

Portland

Trump, meanwhile, announced on Saturday that he’s sending US troops to Portland to “protect” the city and ICE facilities. 

“At the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary,” Trump added.

Leftist groups notably declared “war against ICE” last week… 

For some background on what the Trump administration is doing about leftist, NGO-funded violence;

In short, the administration has shifted from a defensive posture to the beginning innings of an offensive campaign against these NGOs, signaling that accountability and enforcement within the nonprofit sector are now viewed as mission-critical.

But of course, declaring war on armed radical leftists is likely to provoke an escalation in civil terrorism attacks from the left.

The decision to nuke USAID earlier this year marked a starting point (the now-defunded agency was funneling money to radical groups under Biden); the next phase will target the donor class that funds this chaos.

Related:

Over the years we’ve all witnessed these organized ‘resist’ protests which spiral out of control, however the Trump administration needs to be careful – even though the left is clearly the violent party in America.

While the Biden administration and their network of deep state judges aggressively targeted anyone who even thought about approaching the Capitol on Jan. 6, or parents who resisted degenerate indoctrination in schools, or the entire first Trump administration, we can only imagine what the next Democrat president (God forbid) will use this as license for when it’s suddenly OK to send forces to deal with ‘domestic terrorists’ – which will of course be whoever they say they are. It won’t matter that the left – as we know, is committing the actual ‘terrorism’ when they routinely use the FBI to entrap the right & their media tentacles to sell it. Oh you like gun shows? (knock knock, KICK, bang)

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 14:35

FBI Director Dismisses Politicization Accusations Following Comey Indictment

0
FBI Director Dismisses Politicization Accusations Following Comey Indictment

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

FBI Director Kash Patel has dismissed claims that the bureau has become more politicized under his watch in the wake of former Director James Comey’s indictment on Thursday.

In a post early on Friday, Patel defended the FBI’s efforts in the investigation targeting Comey and said that the media, in part, was to blame.

“Career FBI agents, intel analysts, and staff led the investigation into Comey and others. They called the balls and strikes and will continue to do so,” he wrote in a statement on X.

“The wildly false accusations attacking this FBI for the politicization of law enforcement comes from the same bankrupt media that sold the world on Russia Gate—it’s hypocrisy on steroids.”

Russiagate refers to claims that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election to aid President Donald Trump, which he has categorically denied. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence in July said that the Obama administration “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to target Trump, although a special counsel investigation led by former FBI head Robert Mueller in 2019 concluded Russia did interfere in the election.

“Their baseless objections tell us now, more than ever, that we are precisely over the target and will remain on mission until completion,” Patel also wrote.

Comey was indicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on Thursday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office announced. Grand jurors rejected one of the counts that was brought against Comey, but ultimately returned an indictment against the former FBI director.

He’s charged with making a false statement and obstruction relating to testimony he gave before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2020. He could face up to five years in prison if convicted, said the Department of Justice (DOJ).

“The charges as alleged in this case represent a breach of the public trust at an extraordinary level,” U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan said in a statement.

“The balance of power is a bedrock principle of our democracy, and it relies upon accountability and a forthright presentation of facts from executive leadership to congressional oversight.

“Any intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance is a violation of professional responsibility and, most importantly, the law.”

In a statement responding to the indictment, Comey denied the allegations that were brought against him.

“My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system. And I’m innocent. So let’s have a trial,” he said in a video statement on Thursday, characterizing the indictment as retaliation for “standing up to” Trump.

The indictment against Comey said that the former FBI director “falsely” stated to a senator that he had not “authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports. It added that the ”statement was false“ because Comey knew that ”he in fact had authorized” that individual to become an anonymous source in thouse reports, according to the indictment that was filed on Thursday.

The indictment has triggered criticism from congressional Democrats.

“Today, after firing his own choice for U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia, Donald Trump finally got a subservient new replacement to carry out his revenge prosecution against former FBI Director James Comey by bringing baseless criminal charges against him,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump hailed the DOJ’s decision. The president said that he believes Comey was fully aware of the allegedly false statement made to the Senate.

“He knew exactly what he was saying, and that it was a very serious and far reaching lie for which a very big price must be paid,” the president wrote.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 14:00

Russia Has Still Not Received US Response To Putin’s Offer To Extend Nuclear Treaty

0
Russia Has Still Not Received US Response To Putin’s Offer To Extend Nuclear Treaty

In what should be hailed as a significant and positive breakthrough in US-Russia bilateral relations, Russian President Vladimir Putin kicked off the week by offering President Trump a temporary nuclear arms control deal that would extend the status quo by one year, at a moment the future of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or New START, is hanging by a thread.

During a Monday meeting with permanent members of the Russian Security Council, Putin said he was ready to extend by one year the last arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow. This would allow time to negotiate its further extension, likely by another five years. This would be “if the US reciprocates, to prevent a new arms race,” Putin stipulated. However, now reaching the end of the week, and Moscow still hasn’t heard a response on the issue from Washington.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday that Russia was still awaiting the US side’s response to Putin’s offer to extend the New START treaty for one year, and suggested there’s yet to be any reaction whatsoever from the Trump administration.

“Overall, everyone welcomes Russia’s approach and Putin’s initiative. So we’re waiting for the other side’s reaction,” the Putin spokesman said, according to Russia’s TASS news agency.

EPA-EFE/AJ: A monument to the Soviet Union’s first mass-produced tactical nuclear bomb RDS-4 at the Fedora Poletaeva square in Moscow.

Putin had in the Monday remarks painted a dire picture of strategic security in the world. “Unfortunately, it continues to degrade, which is caused by the combined impact of a number of factors, including negative ones, provoking the aggravation of existing and the emergence of new strategic risks,” he had said.

“We associate the multiple problems that have accumulated in the strategic sphere since the beginning of the twenty-first century with the destructive actions of the West,” Putin added.

The fact that Putin is offering a year-long extension to New START while its renewal is negotiated is a major positive sign, showing advancement in trust related to Trump’s efforts to have bilateral talks even as the Ukraine war rages.

New START will expire in February 2026 unless a half-decade extension can be reached. Both leaders have shown willingness to reach a breakthrough on this issue. 

The treaty is intended to limit and reduce nuclear arms on either side, setting a limit of no more than 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 missiles. START I began in 1991, with New START signed under the Obama and Medvedev administrations in 2010 as a successor agreement.

In August 2023 the US accused Russia of violating the treaty in disallowing US on-site inspections under its stipulations. In response, Washington halted Russian inspectors’ ability to do the same on American soil. It’s been in limbo ever since, as the expiration deadline fast approaches.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 13:25

Slowdown Signals: Are Leading Indicators Flashing Red?

0
Slowdown Signals: Are Leading Indicators Flashing Red?

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice,com,

Lately, there’s been a growing sense of confidence among investors that the U.S. economy has dodged the proverbial bullet.

Despite a historic rate-hiking cycle by the Federal Reserve, two years of stubborn inflation, and signs of strain in global trade, the dominant Wall Street narrative is now a curious mix of “soft landing,” “no landing,” and even “re-acceleration.” For example, look at forward earnings estimates for the companies most susceptible to economic growth: small and mid-capitalization stocks. Over the last two years, earnings growth was meager when the economy was “booming” due to massive fiscal and monetary stimulus flows. However, as we head into 2026, Wall Street expects corporate earnings to increase sharply, which can only occur if the economy reaccelerates.

While the market is betting on an economic revival to support current valuation levels, the real economy is suggesting things are slowing down. Notably, the evidence isn’t coming from obscure corners. It’s showing up in the indicators designed to give us a heads-up before a storm arrives.

Unlike data points like GDP or headline payroll numbers that lag, indicators that lead economic changes are meant to flag when momentum is shifting. Historically, these indicators have done an excellent job of predicting economic changes from growth to slowdowns. However, after 2020, with the massive stimulus interventions, the leading indicators have been “missing in action.” Because of that, very few people are paying attention to what these indicators are warning about, and the current optimism feels eerily similar to the late stages of every economic cycle. When markets are up, investors ignore risk, and consider fundamentals irrelevant. But if you know where to look, the warnings are there, and you must be willing to step outside the bullish echo chamber.

There’s a familiar rhythm to economic slowdowns, and we’re hearing it again: first, the data softens quietly; then the revisions come in negative; credit starts tightening; consumer behavior grows cautious; and eventually, the labor market breaks. When everyone finally admits what’s happening, markets have already priced in the damage. That’s why it’s critical to understand what the signals are saying now and not after the fact.

So, let’s take a closer look at the economic dashboard. From my perspective, the economy is not accelerating but slowing down.

Economic Signals

The clearest sign of economic deceleration is the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI), which has declined for 17 consecutive months. That’s not a rounding error; that’s the longest losing streak since the 2008 financial crisis. The LEI includes forward-looking components like new orders, jobless claims, building permits, and consumer expectations. Historically, when the index falls this far for this long, a recession isn’t a matter of “if,” but “when.” Even the Conference Board has publicly projected a contraction in late 2024 or early 2025, but that didn’t happen because of all the fiscal stimulus circulating through the economy. However, that stimulus has ended. The LEI has turned lower again, signaling a pickup in economic weakness. While the market largely ignores this flashing red light because the S&P keeps rising, it is a dangerous divergence that investors should consider.

The bond market is also warning us. The yield curve, specifically the spread between 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields, was inverted for over a year. However, it isn’t the inversion that indicates a recessionary onset; it is the UN-inversion. Every post-war recession has been preceded by an inversion, and a UN-inversion of the yield curve. Most people miss the fact that the inversion itself isn’t the recession, it’s the warning. The real trouble begins when the curve steepens again. Often, this is because the Fed is forced to cut rates in a panic. And guess what? As of this writing, markets are pricing at least 50 basis points of cuts by year-end. That doesn’t happen in a “re-accelerating” economy.

Then there’s the labor market. On the surface, it still looks healthy. But dig deeper, and the cracks are widening. The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently revised previous job gains by over 911,000. Temporary help services continue to decline, and job openings are down roughly 30% from their peak. However, the real number to watch is the percentage of full-time employment. Since full-time employment supports economic growth, it is unsurprising that there is a decent correlation between that measure and GDP. These are not random data points; they are classic early signs that job growth has peaked.

Credit markets are tightening across the board. The Fed’s Senior Loan Officer Survey shows that banks are making it harder to get consumer and commercial loans. Notably, credit is the oxygen of economic growth, and when it gets harder to borrow, businesses delay hiring and capital expenditures as consumers pull back. In addition, there are rising delinquency rates on credit cards and auto loans, particularly among lower-income households, as the post-COVID stimulus buffer runs out.

Consumer sentiment also continues to deteriorate. The University of Michigan’s latest survey shows a renewed drop in optimism, especially among lower-income groups who are being squeezed by higher prices, student loan repayments, and rising rents. Yes, spending has not collapsed, but that is mainly because consumers are running up credit balances while drawing down what’s left of their savings. This divergence between weak sentiment and sustained spending is not sustainable; eventually, the math breaks.

Given that consumption drives earnings, the slowdown in personal consumption expenditures (PCE) should serve as a warning to more bullish analysts’ forecasts.

Investing When There Are Slowdown Signals

Taken in isolation, each of these signals might be dismissed as noise. But taken together, they paint a consistent picture that the U.S. economy is slowing, and the risk of a traditional, cyclical recession is rising steadily. The trouble is, investors have been lulled into complacency by short-term resilience in the stock market and the memory of pandemic-era policy responses. However, those policy levers may not be as easy to pull now.

The combination of a weakening LEI, an inverted yield curve, tighter credit conditions, softening labor data, falling consumer confidence, and narrowing corporate profit margins doesn’t suggest a soft landing; it indicates the landing zone is shrinking quickly and the Federal Reserve is likely already behind the curve. Crucially, we must not forget that leading indicators, by their nature, flash warnings before the damage is visible. It’s often too late to adjust when these trends show up in GDP or official recession declarations.

One of investors’ biggest mistakes at this cycle stage is anchoring to outdated narratives. They point to low unemployment and solid consumer spending and argue that the worst is behind us. However, those are lagging data points. Unemployment always stays low, right up until it spikes. Spending always looks fine, right up until credit dries up. The market will have already moved if we wait for the headlines to confirm the slowdown.

For investors, the path forward is less about panic and more about preparation. Risk is best managed before it becomes obvious, and currently, that means reassessing portfolio positioning with a greater focus on quality, liquidity, and resilience.

  1. Shift toward higher-quality equities—companies with strong balance sheets, positive cash flow, and stable earnings. In late-cycle environments, businesses that can defend margins and avoid excessive leverage tend to outperform. Defensive sectors like healthcare, utilities, and consumer staples historically perform well in economic slowdowns. These aren’t the exciting momentum plays, but they often hold up better when growth stalls.

  2. Cash is no longer a drag. With money market funds and Treasury bills yielding north of 5%, holding cash offers income and flexibility. In a market that’s likely to become more volatile, the ability to act without selling at a loss becomes a competitive advantage. Don’t let the fear of “missing out” cause you to miss what may be the opportunity to buy later at better prices.

  3. Consider hedging. If you’ve enjoyed substantial gains in the past year, now is the time to protect some of those profits. This could mean trimming back riskier holdings, using inverse ETFs to hedge sector exposure, or selecting options to reduce downside risk. The goal isn’t to go all-in or all-out; it’s to manage exposure with a clear eye on growing macro uncertainty.

  4. Reduce exposure to highly cyclical sectors. Industries tied to discretionary spending, real estate, or manufacturing tend to underperform during economic contractions. If the slowdown intensifies, these areas will likely see earnings revisions and price multiple compression.

  5. Stay tactical. This isn’t the environment for set-it-and-forget-it strategies. Flexibility becomes critical in periods of transition. Markets are forward-looking, and asset prices will have already adjusted by the time the recession shows up in the data. Use this time to tighten your process, raise select cash, and rotate toward areas that can weather a macro storm.

The fiscal and monetary buffers that helped cushion previous slowdowns may not be available now. The federal government is already running massive deficits, and interest payments on the debt are now the fastest-growing budget item. On the monetary side, the Fed is caught between two mandates: inflation isn’t fully tamed, but growth is slowing. Cutting rates too soon risks reigniting price pressures; waiting too long deepens a downturn.

So while the S&P may continue to climb for now, and sentiment might stay upbeat, the forward-looking data suggests that caution may be a more prudent approach.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 12:50

FBI Fires 15 Agents Who Knelt At 2020 George Floyd Protest

0
FBI Fires 15 Agents Who Knelt At 2020 George Floyd Protest

Amid an ongoing campaign to rid the FBI of woke politics and priorities, the bureau has fired roughly 15 agents who were caught on camera kneeling during a 2020 protest following the death of George Floyd under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer. In May of this year, the FBI reassigned the agents, but subsequently fired them, according to anonymous sources cited by the Associated Press and CNN. The kneeling agents were among a group of about 20 agents who were fired at the conclusion of a review by the FBI’s general counsel office.

 (Jose Luis Magana/ AP)

When photographs were published that showed a large group of agents taking a knee as they pandered to protesters in Washington, controversy erupted both inside and outside the FBI. Beyond the political dynamic, some senior FBI officials felt that the agents put themselves and peers at a tactical disadvantage. Here’s how retired FBI supervisory special agent James Gagliano summed up the ugly spectacle: 

[There are] two possible, equally repugnant purposes behind the kneelers’ actions. The symbolic genuflection in the face of protesters (and the movement’s rioters who destroyed businesses and government buildings and claimed lives) was either an expression of unity with BLM, or these armed agents were blatant cowards and spinelessly acquiesced to the demands of a threatening mob. Whichever the reason, it is fully nauseating to career agents.

During the Biden administration and under then-Director Christopher Wray, the incident was reviewed with a conclusion that no policies had been violated. This year, the bureau decided to give it a second look. As a result, the agents were first reassigned to jobs that were perceived as demotions, but have now been jettisoned altogether.  

In August, two senior FBI officials were fired: Brian Driscoll, who served as acting director before Kash Patel’s confirmation, and Steve Jensen, who was acting director of the Washington Field Office (WFO). Both have sued, claiming they were victimized by a “campaign of retribution” targeting agents insufficiently loyal to President Trump. There may be many more terminations to come. The DOJ has said it is scrutinizing the actions of more than 1,500 agents involved in investigations of questionable merit, such as the prosecutions of members of Trump’s first administration and the extraordinary effort mounted against participants in the January 6 riots. 

This week, it was revealed that the FBI deployed a stunning 274 agents to the U.S. Capitol on Jan 6. The news was broken by Just The News, which obtained an after-action report that included rank-and-file agents’ sharp criticism of the bureau in general and the Washington Field Office in particular. As one agent wrote, “WFO is a hopelessly broken office that’s more concerned about wearing masks and recruiting preferred racial/sexual groups than catching actual bad guys.“

The FBI Agents Association condemned the dismissals and criticized Patel’s job performance. “Rather than providing these agents with fair treatment and due process, Patel chose to again violate the law by ignoring these agents’ constitutional and legal rights instead of following the requisite process,” the group said in a statement. Others, however, are quite pleased: 

*  *  *ATTENTION: Secure your meat before free shipping goes away Sunday night… Several items already sold out.

Just the Steaks (10 lbs)

Filet Mignon and other goodies (11 lbs)

Ground Beef (10 lbs, on sale in addition to free shipping)

Texas Lasagna & Meatballs (clean comfort food… holy crap it’s good)

Beef, Chick & Pork Trio

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 12:15

$400 Inflation Refund Checks Now Being Mailed Out To 8.2 Million NY Households

0
$400 Inflation Refund Checks Now Being Mailed Out To 8.2 Million NY Households

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

The state of New York will be mailing “inflation refund checks” to 8.2 million households, the governor’s office announced Friday.

Gov. Kathy Hochul’s office said that up to $400 checks “will be mailed directly to eligible New Yorkers, with deliveries to continue throughout October and November” and that households do not need to apply, sign up, or take any other action to receive the checks.

According to Hochul’s office, joint tax filers with income up to $150,000 will receive a $400 payment, and joint tax filers with income between $150,001 and $300,000 will receive $300.

Single tax filers who have an income up to $75,000 will get $200, and single tax filers with incomes between $75,000 and $150,000 will get $150, the announcement said.

“Starting today, we’re sending inflation refund checks to over 8 million New Yorkers because it’s simple—this is your money and we’re putting it back in your pockets,” Hochul said in a statement about the checks.

But the check will only be sent if the person filed a New York state resident income tax return, or Form IT-201, reported income within qualifying thresholds, and was not claimed as a dependent for the tax year 2023, the New York Department of Taxation and Finance said.

“We will begin mailing refund checks to eligible taxpayers at the end of September 2025,” the tax agency said, adding that because of the “large volume of checks” being mailed out over the coming weeks, some people may receive “your check sooner or later than your neighbors, as mailings are not based on zip code or region.”

The agency added that it cannot provide a specific delivery schedule, and contact center representatives will not have additional information on the status of checks.

The statement said that the check will be mailed to the address that was associated with the person’s most recently filed tax return, meaning that if the recent address was used to file state taxes in 2024, the inflation refund check will be sent there.

It also said that there will be no direct deposits to bank accounts and that only checks will be mailed.

The one-time payments were part of a 2025 state budget provision that was passed in the state legislature. Hochul’s office said that inflation has increased costs of necessities, meaning that state revenue from the collection of sales tax has increased.

The rebate checks are different from stimulus checks, also known as economic impact payments, which have been authorized by Congress through legislation and distributed by the U.S. Treasury Department.

U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in July introduced a bill that would send tax rebates to qualified taxpayers using revenue from tariffs instituted by President Donald Trump. Hawley’s bill has not passed the Senate.

Inflation rose in August as the price of gas, groceries, and airfare jumped, while new data showed applications for unemployment aid soared. Consumer prices increased 2.9 percent in August from a year earlier, the Labor Department said Thursday, up from 2.7 percent the previous month and the biggest jump since January.

In response to the weakening job market, the Federal Reserve earlier this month cut its policy interest rate by 0.25 percent to a range of 4.00-to-4.25 percent.

*  *  *

ATTENTION: Buy some meat before free shipping goes away Sunday night… Several items already sold out.

Just the Steaks (10 lbs)

Filet Mignon and other goodies (11 lbs)

Ground Beef (10 lbs, on sale in addition to free shipping)

Texas Lasagna & Meatballs (clean comfort food… holy crap it’s good)

Beef, Chick & Pork Trio

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 11:40

Kiev ‘Will Lose Ukraine’ If It Doesn’t Accept Moscow’s Terms, Lukashenko Warns

0
Kiev ‘Will Lose Ukraine’ If It Doesn’t Accept Moscow’s Terms, Lukashenko Warns

Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko at the Kremlin in Moscow on Friday, with the two hailing expansion of cooperation on all levels.

“We are practically enjoying active collaboration in all directions,” the Russian president said. “The same applies to security issues and ensuring the safety of the Union State. By the way, here, as we agreed, everything continues in a rhythmic and operational mode. Everything keeps developing naturally,” Putin added.

Lukashenko is joining Putin and other officials at events of the World Atomic Week in Moscow during the two-day visit.

Most importantly, Lukashenko revealed while speaking to the media after discussions with Putin that Russia has presented a new peace proposal to Ukraine, and that Kiev’s response will determine the outcome of the conflict.

According to state media source BelTA, he went so far as to warn the Ukrainians that if they don’t accept its terms, they they will lose all of Ukraine.

Via CNN

“There are good proposals for resolving the Ukrainian conflict,” Lukashenko said of options which are apparently on the table. According to his full comments as translated by BelTA:

“You can say and declare anything. But what if the Kremlin strikes Bankovaya Street [a street in Kiev where Ukrainian government institutions are headquartered]? What would remain of it? Therefore, Vladimir Zelensky needs to calm down. There are good proposals on the table. We discussed them with President Putin. I will not speak about them; the president will speak about them himself.

These are good proposals. Proposals regarding Ukraine, which were also heard by Donald Trump in Alaska, were taken to Washington for consideration and discussion.”

After again calling them “Very good proposals,” he then warned ominously that “If the Ukrainians do not accept these proposals, then the situation will be like the beginning of the Special Military Operation. It will be even worse. They will lose Ukraine.”

As far as what Moscow is offering for negotiated settlement, this without doubt includes Kiev giving up all claims to the four easter territories and to Crimea, as well as to never join NATO, and that it must open up restrictions on the Russian language. Essentially Ukraine will see it as a plan of ‘surrender’.

It was this past summer that Russian forces expanded their operations beyond the Donbass for the first going. The military has at this point captured several villages and settlements Ukraine’s central Dnipropetrovsk region, which neighbors Donetsk. Ukraine’s manpower crisis has only grown worse in the meantime.

This signifies that Moscow could expand the fight, and Lukashenko’s latest warning suggests this as well. However, Putin unlikely desires to attempt to occupy the whole of the country, but the threat is being echoed amid the ongoing standoff with NATO.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 11:05

The Smuggery

0
The Smuggery

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

Days Of Judgment

“If you want a friend in DC, get a dog. We’re coming for you.”

Dan Bongino, Deputy Director, FBI

You better believe Martha Stewart baked a cake last night — the lovely Gâteau Opéra perhaps? — when she got the news that the ham sandwich known as James Comey got indicted by a federal grand jury twenty-two years after that same ham sandwich indicted the goddess of hearth and home for lying to the FBI and the SEC over a trumped-up insider-trading rap, and sent her to federal prison for a five-month stretch plus five additional months of confined home-making and two years of supervised redecorating.

Mr. Comey’s indictment is probably just the opening salvo in what will be a barrage of indictments coming down against government officials who used their powers-under-law to harass, disable, cancel, dis-bar, bankrupt, persecute and ruin thousands of their fellow citizens, including especially the 45th president and the people who worked for him.

Jim Comey was the engine who pulled the choo-choo train of seditious fakery known as RussiaGate (Donald Trump colluding with Vladimir Putin) into America’s public life, which then expanded into the years-long ass-covering operations of the Mueller Investigation, then Impeachments One and Two, then the J-6 FBI-engineered “insurrection,” then Nancy Pelosi’s Congressional J-6 committee gong show, and then the four various fugazi prosecutions against Mr. Trump in 2024 designed to derail his re-run for office, bankrupt his family, and stuff him in prison for the rest of his life.

Mr. Comey and his associates must be astounded that none of that worked. It really was a mighty organized criminal endeavor. And, as such, it stands to be prosecutable under the RICO statutes, which means that these current two charges against Mr. Comey should be a preview of attractions to come against him and many other familiar characters, possibly including his successor as FBI Director Christopher Wray. (The Blaze reports overnight that the FBI deployed roughly 275 plainclothes agents into the J-6 protest crowd at the US Capitol, as opposed to the 26 agents that Mr. Wray testified about to Congress.)

The smuggery of this gang in the years since all this business started in 2016 has also been out of this world. Mr. Comey dropped one rancid video after another either making threats or sanctimoniously declaring his sainthood, as if he expected the dreadful day would never come that he might face charges. Likewise, former Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe ran his mouth all over CNN for years, former CIA Director John Brennan spun fibs on MSNBC, while FBI RussiaGate straw-boss Peter Strzok rode shotgun regularly with fake news confabulator Rachel Maddow. All of it was designed to bamboozle the public, and it worked!

You can expect more than one RICO case to come because these crimes against our country occurred in many discrete episodes of organized misconduct over many years. The RussiaGate op involving Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Hillary, Obama, Biden, et al., was quite separate from Adam Schiff’s orchestrated seditious Impeachment #1 featuring CIA mole Eric Ciaramella, Col. Alexander Vindman, and ICIG Michael Atkinson. As was the activity of the Mueller group actually supervised by Andrew Weissmann (because Robert Mueller was secretly non compos mentis). As were the J-6 shenanigans of Mr. Wray’s FBI, including the DNC Pipe Bomb sideshow. As were the Lawfare exploits of Norm Eisen and Mary McCord conniving with “Joe Biden’s” White House to arrange the Trump prosecutions by DA Alvin Bragg and AG Letitia James in New York and DA Fani Willis in Fulton County, GA. As were the dark deeds of Merrick Garland and his Special Counsels Jake Smith, David Weiss, and Robert Hur. As were the 2020 and 2022 election-rigging capers of Marc Elias & Company. As were whatever peculiar directives were ordered by Alejandro Mayorkas to throw the US borders wide open. As were the “autopen” abuse by the White House staff and their cover-up of “Joe Biden’s” mental decline.

All of these vile pranks would have to be prosecuted in separate packets of cases. You might think it’s just too much for this Department of Justice, and that the three remaining years of Trump 2.0 are not enough time for so much action. But they represent extremely serious breaches of official duty verging on treason. There are probably aspects of it all and additional characters involved whom I have left out. They have gravely injured our country and turned us against each other. Their prosecutions will be heavy lifting, but it has to be done.

One prediction I’ll venture. Jim Comey’s defense will be based on “altitude sickness.”

Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/27/2025 – 10:30