69.5 F
Chicago
Sunday, September 20, 2026
Home Blog Page 1366

“Train Wreck”: Extreme Measures Being Taken To Battle Biden’s ‘Green’ Energy Grid Crisis

“Train Wreck”: Extreme Measures Being Taken To Battle Biden’s ‘Green’ Energy Grid Crisis

Energy Secretary Chris Wright warns that the U.S. power grid is nearing its capacity limit, as his department urgently works to avert a potential crisis.

This week, the Energy Department issued an emergency order to counter a Southeast heatwave threatening grid stability and blackouts, authorizing full operation of specific electric generating units.

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright

“In my department, we’ve issued four emergency orders just in the last few weeks to stop the closure of reliable plants, so we can keep the lights on and stop pushing up electricity prices,” Wright said in an interview Thursday with Fox News.

“We were on a course that was a train wreck,” the Trump official warned. “We’re doing everything possible now to sweep out the nonsense.”

Wright blamed Biden-era regulations, specifically emission regulation, for that power grid being on the brink of failure.

“We had to issue an emergency order a few days ago just to let utilities in the Southeast run their plants at full capacity so they could keep the lights on. Under the Biden laws, that’s illegal,” Wright said. “Emissions rules would have prevented them from producing all the electricity they could, and they would have had rolling brownouts. That’s just total nonsense.”

U.S. electricity demand is projected to surge 16% over the next five years, three times the growth predicted just last year, according to the White House. In April, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to bolster the reliability and security of the grid.

We need to make changes rapidly. We need to see new capacity built, smarter regulation, we need to use our grid wiser. There’s so many things we need to do to improve it. We can’t do it all overnight,” Wright cautioned.

“I can assure you, the team at [the] Department of Energy and across this administration are 24/7, seven days a week, working to get out the morass, the nonsense that got put in,” he added. “Free American energy production, and bring jobs back here. We want a shortage of electricity and plumbers and all that, that pushes wages up and that gives great job opportunities for all those hard-working Americans.”

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum declared in May that the U.S. is on the brink of crippling blackouts, much like those that paralyzed Spain, thanks to reckless over-subsidization of unreliable renewable energy sources.

Burgum attributed Spain’s grid collapse to its heavy reliance on unreliable wind and solar power, declaring, “It just defies physics. You can’t run an electrical grid with just intermittent power. You cannot run with something that is based on intermittent, which is the definition of solar or wind, because the sun doesn’t shine at night, and the wind doesn’t blow every day.”

Burgum didn’t mince words, warning that America is barreling toward the same disaster. “We became dangerously close to that right now. We’ve got parts of our country that are at risk for those same kind of—what I’ll call the Biden brownouts and blackouts—to happen,” the Trump official told Friedberg.

Burgum also blasted the administration’s obsession with over-subsidizing flaky renewable energy while slapping punishing regulations on dependable coal and nuclear power. Burgum argued these misguided moves, all in the name of “saving the planet,” are recklessly jeopardizing America’s energy security. “All we’re doing is potentially putting our own country at risk,” he stressed, calling for an immediate pivot to secure a robust grid to fuel the Trump administration’s economic goals—especially as China races ahead with its aggressive energy expansion.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/26/2025 – 20:30

More Fetal Losses Than Expected After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccination In Israel: Study

More Fetal Losses Than Expected After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccination In Israel: Study

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A higher-than-expected number of miscarriages and other forms of fetal loss were associated with COVID-19 vaccinations in Israel, a new study has revealed.

A medic prepares a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in Netanya, Israel, on Jan. 5, 2022. Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images

Researchers found 13 fetal losses—four more than the nine expected—for every 100 pregnant women who received a COVID-19 vaccine during weeks eight to 13 in pregnancy, according to the study, which was published as a preprint on the medRxiv server.

Most people in Israel, including pregnant women, received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer did not respond by publication time to a request for comment.

The team behind the study includes Retsef Levi, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher who was recently named to the committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccines, and Dr. Tracy Hoeg, who works for the Food and Drug Administration.

The researchers analyzed electronic health records from Maccabi Healthcare Services, one of four organizations that provide health care to Israelis. They looked at 226,395 pregnancies that occurred between March 1, 2016, and Feb. 28, 2022. The primary analysis looked at fetal loss for pregnant women after dose one or dose three of a COVID-19 vaccine, with fetal loss including miscarriage, abortion, and stillbirth.

The researchers came up with an expected number of fetal losses based on a model that drew from data before the COVID-19 pandemic, then compared the expected number of fetal losses with those that occurred from week eight of pregnancy onward.

They identified 13,214 fetal losses after the COVID-19 pandemic started, compared with 12,846 fetal losses in the reference period, finding that women who received a COVID-19 vaccine during weeks eight to 13 in pregnancy experienced a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses.

“If you believe this result … every 100 women that you would vaccinate during weeks eight to 13, you are going to see close to four additional fetal losses,” Levi told The Epoch Times.

The researchers cautioned that more information is required to say for sure that the vaccines cause fetal losses.

They also noted that when they carried out the same analysis for pregnant women who received a COVID-19 vaccine during weeks 14 to 27, the number of fetal losses was lower than expected.

An additional analysis of pregnant women who received an influenza vaccine from March 1, 2018, to Feb. 28, 2019, also found a lower-than-expected number of fetal losses.

The researchers said those results could stem from what is known as healthy vaccine bias—the data could be skewed because people who receive vaccines are typically healthier than those who do not.

Maccabi Healthcare Services did not return an inquiry by publication time. Dr. Yaakov Segal, head of obstetrics and gynecology medicine at the organization, is one of the paper’s co-authors.

Israel’s Ministry of Health and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which encourages pregnant women to receive a COVID-19 vaccine in any trimester, did not respond to requests for comment by publication time.

“Generally, medical advice to pregnant women follows the precautionary principle and is based on sound and careful research,” Josh Guetzkow, researcher with Hebrew University of Jerusalem and another study co-author, told The Epoch Times via email. “Our study shows just how irresponsible it was for our health authorities to abandon these core principles.”

COVID-19 vaccination was recommended for pregnant women in Israel and the United States early in the COVID-19 pandemic, even though the clinical trials for the vaccines excluded pregnant women.

Moderna’s clinical trial for pregnant women was ultimately terminated, while Pfizer ended its trial early after enrolling just 175 women. The latter found slightly lower COVID-19 incidence among the vaccinated when compared with those who received a placebo.

Some observational studies have determined that pregnant women benefit from COVID-19 vaccination.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently narrowed its COVID-19 vaccine recommendations and no longer advises COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

The new paper was published as a preprint, without peer review. Levi said the paper had been rejected by two journals, and the authors decided that the implications were too important to continue to not release it to the public.

Guetzkow said the researchers are going to keep trying to get the paper published by a journal.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/26/2025 – 18:25

Trump Team Launches SuperPAC Focused Solely On Ousting Massie

Trump Team Launches SuperPAC Focused Solely On Ousting Massie

Rapidly making good on President Trump’s promise to back a 2026 Republican primary challenger to libertarian-minded Rep. Thomas Massie, the Trump team has already launched a super PAC dedicated entirely to removing Massie from office next year. It promises to make for the strongest challenge Massie’s faced yet.

The new “Kentucky MAGA” super PAC will be run by top Trump political operatives Tony Fabrizio and Chris LaCivita, with La Civita telling Axios the new entity will spend “whatever it takes” to replace Massie. Trump’s political circle has already had discussions with potential challengers. “Massie’s long-time opposition to…really anything to do with President Trump — is coming to an end,” LaCivita said

First elected to Congress in 2012 and consistently advocating for fiscal discipline, the right of armed self-defense, and a non-interventionist foreign policy, Massie has built a large and loyal national following among the libertarian right and other conservatives, with many regarding him as the congressional successor to the iconic Ron Paul. Massie issued a caution to would-be challengers: “Any serious person considering running should spend money on an independent poll before letting swampy consultants take them for an embarrassing ride.”

Massie, who has two degrees from MIT, has repeatedly triggered Trump’s wrath. In 2020, he opposed the $2 trillion, Trump-backed Covid-19 “relief package.” When Congressional leaders tried to usher it through without members present, Massie memorably stepped to the podium and declared, “Mr. Speaker, I came here to make sure our republic doesn’t die by unanimous consent in an empty chamber, and I request a recorded vote.” Last year, Massie told Tucker Carlson about his quest, which entailed a rushed, 8-hour drive to Washington and sleeping three nights in his wife’s SUV:  

In May of this year, Massie was one of only two Republicans to vote against the “Big Beautiful Bill.” Objecting to its continuation of Washington’s profligate spending, he said, “We’re not rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic tonight. We’re putting coal in the boiler and setting a course for the iceberg.” More recently, Massie condemned Trump’s unconstitutional waging of war on Iran and introduced a war powers resolution to prohibit military action without congressional consent.  

Massie’s resistance to war on Iran, and his frequent votes against aid to Israel and other elements of Israel’s agenda inside American shores, means pro-Israel forces will be gunning for Massie too. Despite the fact that Massie faced no viable GOP opponent nor any Democrat opponent at all in 2024, the intentionally-vaguely-named United Democracy Project — the independent campaign-spending arm of the mighty American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — said it was spending $300,000 on ads on Fox television affiliates all across Kentucky last year. The move was seen as an preemptive attack in case Massie opts to pursue the seat being vacated by Mitch McConnell in 2026.  

Given Republicans’ narrow 220-to-213 edge in House seats, Massie’s refusal to play ball frequently causes anxiety for the Trump administration and House leadership. (Two formerly-Democratic seats currently empty due to the deaths of the incumbents are awaiting special elections.)  

For now, other Republicans in the House are abstaining from joining Trump in attacking Massie. When asked if he’ll back Massie in his primary, Speaker Mike Johnson — whom Massie voted against in the speakership selection — told NBC News “[that’s] the hardest question I had this morning.” As the GOP leadership team laughed nearby, Johnson added: 

“I’m a leader of my party here, and the speaker leads the incumbent protection program. I got to make sure everybody gets re-elected… I certainly understand the president’s frustration about the colleague you named, and he and I talk about that quite a bit.”

Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales, who himself dodged a MAGA-led challenge in 2024, said, “Teaming up to go against President Trump? Yeah, no, that doesn’t sound like a winning mission for me. I’ll sit this one out, boys. You all let me know how it goes.” On the other side of the Capitol, however, the most libertarian-minded senator, Rand Paul, praised Massie and predicted he’ll survive the onslaught:

“He’s the most faithful to the Constitution of any of the members of the House. He’s fiscally conservative, and I think he cares a lot about Kentucky. And I think that’s what they’ll remember when they vote for him.”

Unlike traditional PACs, super PACs are allowed to raise and spend unlimited funds from individuals, corporations and other entities to advocate for or against candidates. They cannot, however, coordinate their strategy with candidates, though the intent of that restriction is easily circumvented. As the anti-Massie super PAC gears up, Trump’s most recent attacks on Massie and his vow to unseat him have had an unintended effect — as contributions to Massie’s campaign fund have poured in from around the country:   

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 18:00

    Big Data Centers Are Booming, But Secret Deals Draw Local Opposition

    Big Data Centers Are Booming, But Secret Deals Draw Local Opposition

    Authored by John Haughey via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    From Georgia to Oregon, New England to New Mexico, data center projects are drawing opposition in local government hearings by residents concerned about the voracious demand for electricity, water consumption, and noise. Critics also argue that data centers don’t produce the jobs other land uses generate.

    In an aerial view, the IAD71 Amazon Web Services data center is seen in Ashburn, Va., on July 17, 2024. Northern Virginia is the world’s largest and fastest-growing data center market, with Ashburn known as “Data Center Alley” for its dense cluster of facilities. But rising concerns over energy use and land availability have sparked debate among local communities. Nathan Howard/Getty Images

    In Texas, people in small towns question data center development in the broader context of rapid rural industrialization.

    In Pennsylvania, ad hoc groups say data centers are tapping into nearby natural gas fields, increasing the frequency of fracking, and straining water supplies.

    In Indiana, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, and across the country, residents say the scale and proximity of these high-tech campuses degrade their neighborhoods and devalue properties.

    Objections vary, depending on proposal and site, but a common complaint is state and local governments offering data center projects tax incentives that are often shielded from public scrutiny through nondisclosure agreements.

    Companies say these pacts shield proprietary corporate intelligence, but the perceived lack of transparency fosters suspicion and anger when residents realize local planners are set to approve a proposal they knew little to nothing about until it appeared to be a done deal.

    “Just from our experience, it seems like one of the big concerns is that, yeah, there is no community outreach,” Kamil Cook, Public Citizen’s Texas climate and clean energy associate, told the Epoch Times. “There’s no method by which the community can be informed in a way that actually makes it seem like their voice is valued and that they have a choice in these matters.”

    Much of this local opposition appears rooted in the complaint that people “weren’t informed to begin with, were ignored at some point,” said Joe Warnimont, who co-authored a February HostingAdvice.com survey. The survey of 800 people in 16 states found that 93 percent agreed that “cutting-edge AI data centers are vital to the United States,” but only 35 percent want one in their town.

    The main insights are there is clearly a disconnect between what the local residents experience and what is being sold to these communities from developers,” Warnimont told The Epoch Times.

    Protect PT executive director Gillian Graber said her western Pennsylvania nonprofit had no idea that planners in Westmoreland County’s Upper Burrell township were considering TECfusions’ bid to build a data center at a former Alcoa site, until reading a local newspaper article.

    “We were, like, ‘What is this thing? What’s happening? What does that mean for the community in Upper Burrell?’” she told The Epoch Times.

    Construction continues on phases three through five of a Facebook data center in Eagle Mountain, Utah, on Oct. 5, 2021. As artificial intelligence drives demand for greater data processing, data center projects nationwide are facing local pushback. George Frey/Getty Images

    When residents contacted local planners and officials “early on” to get project details, they wouldn’t discuss specifics, or “they didn’t really seem to know a lot about it,” Graber said.

    Protect PT, which stands for Protect Penn-Teller, was founded in Graber’s Harrison City living room a decade ago to challenge fracking and other industrial development some residents say are degrading the area’s environment, she said.

    They haven’t won many battles, but they continue to show up.

    “Like with everything we work on, it’s always larger corporations and large industries that come into rural communities and think they can just do whatever they want,” Graber said. “We don’t want to see that happen again … but I see history repeating itself again, and again, and again.”

    A cursory Facebook search finds dozens of ad hoc local groups with pages where similar claims are aired.

    Texans in Granbury say “working-class residents living next to giant, loud, environmentally-destructive data centers are the ones paying the price for Texas’s crypto boom.” Minnesotans call on state legislators to impose more restrictions because “these developments are reshaping our communities.”

    The 3,500 members of the Stop Duneland and Valpo/Wheeler Data Centers Facebook group in Indiana express frustration that a planning commission has threatened to waive public hearings on a proposed data center project. The page is rife with comments such as, “We have no voice anymore? Seems like that’s a dictatorship in my opinion.”

    Tax Revenue Boon

    The Data Center Coalition, which represents 36 “hyperscalers”—corporations including Meta, AWS, and Microsoft—and co-location companies that own data centers leased to operators, such as Equinix, acknowledged data center projects are drawing resistance in some areas, but noted most criticism is standard for any development proposal.

    I think that sometimes gets lost in media coverage,” Jon Hukill, communications director of the Washington-based coalition, told The Epoch Times. “Data centers want to be good neighbors. They communicate with HOAs [home owners associations] and citizens and local and state governments before, during, and after the permitting process.”

    “The data center industry is not monolithic. There are a wide variety of companies,” Hukill said.

    Data centers are expensive to build and plan to be operating in a community for many years, he said, so developers and operators strictly follow laws, zoning, and land-use regulations.

    Read the rest here…

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 17:40

    Kilmar Abrego Garcia Could Soon Become A World Traveler (Again)

    Kilmar Abrego Garcia Could Soon Become A World Traveler (Again)

    Federal prosecutors informed a judge earlier today that they intend to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia—an illegal alien and suspected human trafficker—again, following his imminent release from a Tennessee jail, this time to a country other than El Salvador. In response, his attorneys urgently petitioned a federal judge in Maryland to order his transfer back to the far-left sanctuary state, where his wife is suing the Trump administration over what they claim was a wrongful deportation in March.

    AP News reports that U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Kilmar Abrego Garcia has the right to be released while awaiting trial. However, she decided to keep him in custody for several more days due to concerns that immigration agents might attempt to deport him before legal proceedings concluded.

    Federal immigration agents are preparing to deport the illegal alien to an as-yet-unidentified “third country“—a continuation of the Trump administration’s broader mission to restore national security in the Homeland after the Biden-Harris regime facilitated a mass illegal alien invasion.

    Garcia could soon become a world traveler, jet-setting to Libya, South Sudan, or another third-world country destination. This follows his recent deportation to El Salvador, where he spent time in the notorious Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) before being flown back to the U.S. to face federal human trafficking charges.

    “If this Court does not act swiftly, then the Government is likely to whisk Abrego Garcia away to some place far from Maryland,” Abrego Garcia’s attorneys wrote in their request to Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Greenbelt, Maryland. 

    Our plan is that he will be taken into ICE custody and removal proceedings will be initiated,” Jonathan Guynn, a deputy assistant attorney general at the Department of Juice’s civil division, told the court.

    To El Salvador or a third country?” Judge Xinis asked.

    He responded: “To a third country is my understanding.” 

    In mid-April, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) traveled—on likely the taxpayers’ dime—to visit Garcia at what appeared to be a resort-like facility. A widely circulated image of Van Hollen alongside the illegal alien and suspected gang member gave the impression they were casually sipping margaritas

    The optics didn’t sit well with some Maryland residents, who began questioning whether their senator’s priorities lie with foreigners or with their own constituents

    He will get due process, but make no mistake about it. Abrego Garcia is back in the U.S., but it’s no homecoming,” Jonathan Turley penned in an opinion piece in Fox News earlier this month.

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 17:20

    Feminists Are Begging For Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them For Everything

    Feminists Are Begging For Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them For Everything

    Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us

    One rule has remained true for generations when it comes to the division between the sexes: Men are held accountable for everything, women accept accountability for nothing.

    Obviously, there’s going to be exceptions to the rule, but the majority of the time it is true that modern western women have a serious problem taking responsibility when things go wrong. They have been taught from a very early age that they are victims: Victims of men, victims of society, victims of “patriarchy”, victims of religion, victims of biology, victims of circumstance, etc.

    The feminist movement is built entirely around the notion that women can weaponize their victimhood as a means to control society.

    I continue to hold that feminism is the KEY movement that has undermined the success of western culture. Their zealotry has led to the destruction of the nuclear family (the most important factor in a healthy nation). They have helped to facilitate the near collapse of the west and this problem needs to be addressed before it’s too late.

    I recently came across an article in the New York Times which explains the decline in western relationships in a way that is both hilarious and depressing. The essay is titled Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back’. The author (a 50-something woman from Chicago) recalls the old days of dating when men were easy targets for exploitation.

    We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless…”

    …That dynamic has quietly collapsed. We have moved into an era where many men no longer seek women to impress other men or to connect across difference. They perform elsewhere. Alone. They’ve filtered us out.”

    The author insinuates that the era of easy money and easy sex for women was a product of the masculine dynamics of competition and status (blame men). Yet, she also seems to be waxing nostalgic, longing for those days to return. This was the “Sex And The City” era in the late 1990s and early 2000s that was born from the sexual revolution of second wave feminism. It was the era in which female promiscuity and greed was glorified as the ultimate expression of women’s empowerment.

    The idea was to turn women’s early adult years into a Dionysian orgy; giving away sex to any man with decent looks and a fat wallet in the hopes of eventually trapping a lifetime pay-pig. Marriage and maybe family would come in their 30s (or maybe 40s), but not until they had achieved as much degenerate fun as they could muster.

    The problem is, women are on a biological clock, which is why for thousands of years marriage was THE primary concern for the fairer sex. To waste their 20s giving away their bodies for nothing? That was unthinkable insanity. This would doom them to decades of misery as lonely old maids living off the charity of others, and frankly nothing has changed. Childless cat ladies are still a thing and they are still embarrassing. 

    Only in the first world are these women able to survive.

    No one looks at a spinster and sees her as “powerful” or free. Everyone can smell her failure. Her desperation. Her cope. This is why, more and more, we are beginning to see a sense of panic among women who bought into the feminist con game. They’re realizing that men are not chasing them anymore.

    It started out as a joke among woke leftists who laughed at the “rise of incels”. The number of single men refusing to enter the dating world was skyrocketing and the feminists said this was a good thing. Let the “ugly scrubs” wallow in their loneliness while the ladies go out and gorge on freedom and fun until they get sick. However, the trend has continued to the point that a majority of men are checking out completely.

    Recent surveys reveal that 63% of young men ages 18-29 are single. Around 30% of men have not been sexually active for a year or more. In 1980, 60% of adults were married by the age of 25. Today, only 20% are married by age 25. Men are exiting relationships and marriage at record pace, and because men are the initiators of relationships (men are biologically designed to take risks and pursue), women are starting to feel the pinch.

    The latest data predicts that 45% of women ages of 25 to 44 will be single and childless by the year 2030, and not necessarily by choice. If a woman is single and childless by the time she reaches her mid-30s, her chances of creating a family drop exponentially along with her fertility.

    They are calling it the female loneliness epidemic and it’s bearing down on western society like a freight train. Even feminists are getting worried. As the New York Times opines:

    There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable…”

    This idea that vulnerability is a threat instead of an invitation has created a culture of hesitation, of men circling intimacy but never entering it. And the result is thousands of tiny silos. Everyone performing closeness, but no one making a move that binds. Isolation. Loneliness. A hunger for contact that has nowhere to land…”

    But of course, the Times doesn’t seem to think women are culpable in the slightest for this outcome. Instead, they continue the blame game:

    So here’s what I’ll say: You are missed. Not just by me, but by the world you once helped shape…”

    We remember you. The version of you that lingered at the table. That laughed from the chest. That asked questions and waited for the answers. That touched without taking. That listened – really listened – when a woman spoke.

    You are not gone, but your presence is thinning. In restaurants, in friendships, in the slow rituals of romantic emergence. You’ve retreated – not into malice, but into something softer and harder all at once: Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair.

    Maybe no one taught you how to stay. Maybe you tried once, and it hurt. Maybe the world told you your role was to provide, to perform, to protect — and never to feel…”

    Listen men, your lack of participation is starting to stress out the ladies. Just admit you can’t handle intimacy. Just admit you can’t handle these “powerful” women and their vast intellects and emotional genius. You need to be taught how to behave, that’s all. Just crawl back to them and they’re ready to tolerate you again. Isn’t that nice? They’re giving you a second chance…

    At no point does the author ask WHY men are exhausted? At no point does she ask any actual men what they think or feel before writing her nonsensical screed. Obscured by insufferable and flowery prose, she still blames men while asking them to come back. And that should tell you everything you need to know about feminism in general.

    I would ask feminists the million dollar question that they have avoided for so long:  Have you considered the possibility that men ghost you and will not commit to you because YOU are the problem?  The answer is no, obviously.

    I’m a man in my mid-40s who thankfully dodged the bulk of wokeness in the dating world, but I think I can still explain for the NYT why men are walking away if they’re willing to listen.

    1) First, I must say that an author in her 50s still longing for casual sitcom encounters like she’s in her 20s reveals a lot about why modern women are oblivious. Real life is not Sex In The City – Most men of means do not gravitate towards long term relationships with women in their grandma phase. She should already be in a happy relationship or marriage, she’s had plenty of time to figure this out.

    Feminism has made women think they can engage with life on their own schedule. They can’t.

    2) Men are especially wary of women with baggage. Women initiate 70% of breakups and divorces and feminist influence over family law has made divorce easier and more lucrative than ever for women. The older a woman is the more baggage she has and the less likely a man is going to want to date her seriously, let alone put an expensive ring on her finger.

    Western women have been taught they need to party in their 20s, then pursue serious relationships in their 30s or 40s. Meaning, they ignore their best prospects for at least a decade. Their ideology sets them up to enter the relationship market when their marriage value is lowest.

    3) Men are no longer tolerating the concept of the sexual revolution. They don’t want to take any chances on women who think promiscuity is a virtue. They know that statistically, women who sleep around lack discernment, the ability to connect, self respect and mental stability. Starting a relationship with such a person will only lead to disaster. They never stay happy for long (the grass is always greener). And so, men stay home. Want to get them back? Keep your body count low.

    4) Third-Wave Feminists spent the better part of the last 20 years telling men they are pure evil for being masculine and wanting to chase women. So, men did what you asked of them – They stopped chasing you. They found other more interesting endeavors like their careers and their hobbies. If you want men to come back, perhaps you should APOLOGIZE for all those years of slander.

    5) Modern women have greatly overestimated the usefulness of sex as a bartering tool for securing a man. If you want a man to stick around you’re going to have to show him love and respect, not just what’s inside your pants.

    6) Men are far more conditioned to be alone than women are. Women are communal creatures. They rely on constant interactions, affirmations and group inclusion. Social media might fill the void for a while but it can’t give them what they really want – Intimate personal attention 24/7. Only a partner and children can give you that. In a battle of who can endure loneliness longer, men will win, so don’t make it into a battle.

    7) I’ll tell you the biggest open secret that modern women still don’t understand – They claim that men are afraid of approaching them. They say that men today are “weak” and that they can’t handle the new era of the “boss babe”. They argue that men need to abandon their traditional masculine roles and act more feminine; this will make it easier for everyone to get along.

    These are common jabs at the male ego designed to make men feel ashamed for distancing themselves from feminists. In reality, men value one thing above all else: Peace. If you can’t offer peace, then no man with any sense of self worth has a use for you. Feminists offer the opposite of peace, and so they have no value.

    8) Feminism, like all Marxist movements, is obsessed with power. Everything they do is driven by a desire for power and control; not just over their own lives but over the world around them. Modern women say they want the same power as men, but they need to accept that no matter how much the scales are tipped in their favor through laws, government subsidies, easy college grants, DEI hiring and unfair divorce, they will never be like men.

    The author suggests that men no longer shape the world because they have abandoned the current relationship dynamic. This is foolish. Men continue to shape everything around you. Every utility, every necessity, every government, nearly every company, your safety and security, your ability to be free, it’s all reliant on men. You have no power and you never will.

    Feminist empowerment is a fantasy based on institutional leverage which men ALLOW them to have. Until they stop coveting power they can’t comprehend or handle the divisions between men and women will not be resolved. In short, if feminists want men to pay attention to them again, they will have to stop being feminists.

    Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge.

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 17:00

    Hollowed Out

    Hollowed Out

    Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

    The status quo has pushed everything to an extreme of hollowed-out instability to maintain a superficial appearance of normalcy and stability. But it’s all fake.

    The phrase that best describes the present era is hollowed out. By hollowed out I mean the exterior facade still looks pretty much the same as it did in the past, but the internal structure has corroded / eroded to the point that little remains of what provided strength and stability. What’s left is the illusion of stability.

    Our spectacles have been hollowed out, lifeless, rote repeats of past performances, reduced to unintentional parodies of what was once vibrant.

    Our entertainment has been hollowed out, dominated by remakes, retreads, threadbare extensions of tent-pole franchises and sound-alike songs.

    Even our outrage has been hollowed out, perfunctory displays phoned in from afar, as we all know outrage has been exhausted along with everything else.

    Our “innovation” has been hollowed out, with toys such as flying motorcycles and self-driving taxis presented as “solutions” to phantom “problems,” “solutions” that boil down to hype, clickbait or another reach for higher corporate profits. The most visible result of AI is AI Slop:

    AI Slop: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (29 min) (via Richard M.)

    Our incentives have been hollowed out, leaving only the most perverse extremes. The motivation to flood social media with AI Slop is the faint hope of creating a viral link that earns a pittance for the AI Slopper.

    Our realm of romance has been hollowed out, leaving a hellscape of dating sites and the wreckage left by ubiquitous online porn.

    Our food has been hollowed out, ultra-processed slop remorselessly worked into “new” “innovative” products that are parodies of quality and innovation: you’ve just got to try the new jalapeno-yuzu-crawfish bagel…

    Our politics have been hollowed out, with the only useful reform–requiring politicians to wear the logos of their corporate campaign donors–nixed because it would have made obvious what everyone knows: politics is now an open auction for favors and influence.

    It would be far more honest if we conducted the passage of congressional bills as open auctions on eBay for all to bid and all to see: Buy Now for only $500,000: a tax break hidden deep inside the untouchable Defense Appropriations Bill.

    Our economy has been hollowed out in virtually every sector, from Higher Education to Healthcare to housing. Much of what passes for “growth” is either waste (BS work, planned obsolescence, fraud), statistical trickery or artificial stimulus.

    The shell remains standing but it now requires massive injections of borrowed money to prop up the rotted facade. Consider Higher Education. Before it was hollowed out, millions of college students were educated without needing to enter debt-serfdom to pay tuition and fees. As this chart shows, student loans were zero in 1993.

    Now there’s $1.5 trillion in student loans. The number of administrators quadrupled, while federal legislation made student debt the one form of debt that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, effectively legalizing debt-serfdom.

    The Higher Ed / student loan industry’s relentless hype machine drummed the idea that doom awaited any young person without a university degree, or better yet, a graduate degree or MBA. The net result, as we all know, is a vast over-supply of MBAs, graduates of law schools and computer programmers, all fields currently being decimated as AI tools do to white-collar work what industrial robots did to blue-collar factory work.

    Meanwhile, back in the real economy, the nation has a severe shortage of skilled trade workers–yup, the kind of work denigrated by the “you gotta go to college” machine. Yes, the kind of work AI and robots can’t do: What AI Can’t Do Faster, Better, or Cheaper Than Humans (June 2, 2025)

    The housing and mortgage sectors have also been hollowed out, creating overpriced facades propped up by $2+ trillion in Federal Reserve purchases of mortgage-backed securities (MBS). How did millions of households manage to buy homes from 1946 to 2001 without the Fed nationalizing the mortgage sector and inflating one housing bubble after another in the process?

    Private-equity and corporations with bottomless credit lines courtesy of the Fed have feasted on housing, pushing valuations to extremes of unaffordability while jacking rents to the stratosphere to maximize shareholder value at the expense of the workforce.

    The status quo has pushed us into extremes of hollowed-out instability to maintain a superficial appearance of normalcy and stability. But it’s all fake. If Higher Education now requires students to become debt-serfs, that is not a system worth propping up. It should be allowed to be obsoleted by much more effective and cheaper alternatives, for example what I proposed 13 years ago in my book The Nearly Free University and the Emerging Economy.

    Everything has been hollowed out by insiders being enriched by a system that must be propped up with trillions in borrowed money lest it collapse under its own bloated weight. Insiders, grifters and apologists always trot out rationales which boil down to transparent self-serving excuses cloaked by piteous bleating. Garsh, it wasn’t our greed, it was a butterfly flapping its wings in the Amazon…

    Now that everything’s been hollowed out, nobody is accountable or takes responsibility for any of it. Disconnecting self-serving greed from consequences is the key dynamic in hollowing out once-functional institutions and sectors.

    Our experience of the real world has been hollowed out, too, something I explore in my new book Ultra-Processed Life, which is available at a 25% discount (ebook edition) and 19% discount (print edition) through Friday, June 27.

    *  *  *

    Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

    Subscribe to my Substack for free

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 16:20

    New Texas Law Prevents Land Sales To CCP Members

    New Texas Law Prevents Land Sales To CCP Members

    Authored by Dorothy Li via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Texas will ban individuals and companies with ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from purchasing land in the state under a law set to take effect on Sept. 1.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks with the Jewish Republican Coalition in Las Vegas, Nev., on Sept. 5, 2024. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times

    Gov. Greg Abbott announced on June 23 that he signed Senate Bill 17 into law, restricting the foreign ownership of residential property, agricultural land, mineral deposits, and water rights across Texas.

    The legislation targets nations designated as national security threats by the Director of National Intelligence. Besides communist China, the current list includes Russia, Iran, and North Korea. It also grants the governor the authority to add more countries to the restricted list.

    With the new law, Texas is joining a growing number of states that regulate foreign ownership of their land. From January 2023 to July 2024, a total of 22 states have enacted similar laws limiting or banning foreign ownership of land, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service released in August 2024.

    State Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, who reintroduced SB 17 earlier in 2024, hailed the Texas measures as “the strongest national security bill that this nation has ever seen from any state.”

    I believe that, from the very bottom of my heart, we are protecting our land and our minerals,” the Republican senator said at a press conference on May 31 following the bill’s passage in the Texas Legislature.

    “All of these are our resources that should never fall into the hands of adversarial nations.”

    In November 2022, Kolkhorst first introduced the bill, which was killed in the state’s lower chamber at the time.

    Under the soon-to-be-enacted law, people from the designated nations living in the United States legally are allowed to purchase residential property but only if those properties serve as their primary residences.

    It restricts members of “the ruling political party or any subdivision of the ruling political party” in these nations from purchasing the state’s property. That means CCP members, for example, would not be able to buy land in Texas.

    Individuals who act “as an agent or on behalf of a designated country” are also subject to the land purchase ban.

    The law prohibits them from acquiring land and limits property leases to less than a year at a time.

    The bill passed in the state Senate by a vote of 25–6 on May 30, a day after receiving approval from the House with an 85–57 vote.

    Among the four targeted nations—which collectively hold less than 1 percent of total foreign-held agricultural land—investors from China own the most U.S. forest land and farmland at 277,336 acres, according to the Department of Agriculture’s most recent report.

    Texas alone has 123,708 of those acres, making it the state with the largest Chinese holdings. It was followed by North Carolina with 44,263 acres and Missouri with 42,905 acres.

    Nationwide, Iranian and Russian investors reported owning 3,030 acres and 11 acres, respectively, while there was no reported acreage held by North Koreans, according to the report released in December 2023.

    State Rep. Cole Hefner, a Republican who carried SB 17 in the House, said that the new law will “prevent hostile foreign nations from buying up Texas land and exposing Texas to a significant and growing threat.”

    We cannot, we will not, allow oppressive regimes who actively seek to do us harm to seize control and dictate their terms over our economy, our supply chains, our daily lives, our critical infrastructure, or our food supply,” Hefner said at the May 31 press conference.

    State Sen. Bryan Hughes told reporters that the bill was not about foreign people but was part of Texas’s efforts to stand up against threats from hostile foreign adversaries.

    He pointed to the threats posed by transnational repression, saying that agents from foreign adversaries operate in Texas, going after dissidents and Americans who speak out against them.

    “We love all people,” Hughes said. “We do not support hostile foreign governments that are very open about their designs on us, and we will not let them mess with Texas.

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 15:45

    Trump Demands Cancelation Of ‘Hero’ Netanyahu’s Graft Trial: ‘US Saved Israel, Now It’s Going To Save Bibi’

    Trump Demands Cancelation Of ‘Hero’ Netanyahu’s Graft Trial: ‘US Saved Israel, Now It’s Going To Save Bibi’

    Despite earlier reporting during Trump’s opening months in office to the contrary, the US President and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now seem closer than ever. They are partners in war, and now apparently partners in looking out for each other in legal cases.

    In something unprecedented, Trump has issued a statement being viewed as a brazen attempt to intervene in Israel’s judicial system, at a moment that a high court cross-examination of Netanyahu is set to resume after it was paused due to the judiciary operating in emergency mode during the war with Iran.

    Trump wrote on Truth Social: “BREAKING NEWS… I was shocked to hear that the State of Israel, which has just had one of its Greatest Moments in History, and is strongly led by Bibi Netanyahu, is continuing its ridiculous Witch Hunt against their Great War Time Prime Minister!”

    The lengthy post described that he and Netanyahu “just went through HELL together, fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran, and Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his LOVE for the incredible Holy Land.”

    “Anybody else would have suffered losses, embarrassment, and chaos! Bibi Netanyahu was a WARRIOR, like perhaps no other Warrior in the History of Israel,” Trump claimed further. “The result was something that nobody thought was possible, a complete elimination of potentially one of the biggest and most powerful Nuclear Weapons anywhere in the World, and it was going to happen, SOON! We were fighting, literally, for the Survival of Israel, and there is nobody in Israel’s History that fought harder or more competently than Bibi Netanyahu.”

    The Netanyahu trial goes back to 2020, and Trump further called the whole saga “politically motivated” and asserted that the prime minister been through a “Horror Show”.

    “Such a WITCH HUNT, for a man who has given so much, is unthinkable to me,” Trump further wrote. “Bibi Netanyahu’s trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State.”

    The trial focuses on three corruption cases – including charges of fraud and breach of trust, as well as charges of bribery. The allegations range from illegally receiving expensive gifts based on political favors, to quid pro quo agreements with some Israeli media sources for more favorable coverage, to authorizing telecom-related regulatory decisions to benefit friends and allies.

    Trump’s very strong words on the case have caused alarm in Israel due especially to how much foreign aid and military assistance Washington has historically given Israel.

    Such direct pressure by the sitting US president could cause judicial decision makers to soften their approach and thus impartiality, many fear. It also will certainly create unease among Netanyahu’s political opposition, to say the least.

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 15:25

    The Next Energy Revolution Is Coming. Is The DOE Ready?

    The Next Energy Revolution Is Coming. Is The DOE Ready?

    Authored by Drew Bond via RealClearEnergy,

    The last energy revolution that changed the world — natural gas fracking — happened in part thanks to the Department of Energy (DOE). Early R&D funding, support for horizontal drilling, and key public-private partnerships helped fracking get off the ground and turn America into an energy powerhouse.

    Now, we are on the cusp of another energy revolution, this time focused on the clean technologies of advanced nuclear, geothermal, natural hydrogen, and fusion. Fortunately, the United States is rich in these energy resources. The challenge with these technologies isn’t a lack of supply; it’s the speed and scale at which we can bring this energy online. 

    American innovators and entrepreneurs are ready to deliver solutions, but outdated bureaucracy and inefficiency within the DOE threaten to delay progress. With a leader like Secretary Chris Wright, who brings real-world experience from the private sector, the DOE has an opportunity to once again become a force multiplier for energy innovation — if it embraces smart, structural reforms.

    Here’s where the DOE can start.

    1. Streamline Contracting and Applications

    The DOE’s current application and contracting process is burdensome and redundant. Companies often face unnecessary delays just trying to navigate paperwork, such as being required to secure community benefits agreements or labor partnerships before the technology in question is even commercially viable. To make matters worse, organizations must submit separate applications for each DOE program or office, even when pursuing similar goals.

    The DOE can address this issue by standardizing applications across the department, eliminating duplicative requirements, and leveraging modern tools like AI to automate non-critical aspects of the process. These changes would increase efficiency, lower barriers to new entrants, and accelerate the introduction of transformative technologies to market.

    2. Cut NEPA Red Tape — Where DOE Has Authority

    While protecting the environment and holding polluters accountable is an essential role for the government, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has been weaponized to stall or block critical energy projects. While the DOE does not have full control over NEPA’s broader structure, and Congress should seriously consider repealing this outdated law, DOE does have discretion over how NEPA is applied to its programs and supported projects.

    One key opportunity is for DOE to expand the use of categorical exclusions — designations for projects that do not significantly impact the environment and therefore do not require full-scale environmental assessments. This is especially important for new energy technologies that haven’t yet reached commercial scale or environmental risk.

    DOE can also streamline internal review timelines, accelerate grant negotiations, and release funding as soon as projects meet agreed-upon milestones. These kinds of administrative reforms are entirely within DOE’s control and could make a real difference in the pace of deployment.

    3. Focus on Acceleration, Not Picking Winners and Losers

    DOE should not be in the business of picking technological winners and losers. The private sector is far better suited to determine what solutions work best in the real world. The federal government should not also be financing projects that can secure private financing. What the DOE should do, however, is utilize its considerable resources, such as the Loan Programs Office, to bridge funding gaps and accelerate promising technologies to market on a global scale.

    This means supporting a diverse range of innovations — from next-generation nuclear to long-duration storage and advanced grid software — not because of ideological preferences, but because we need all of the above to meet growing demand. The key is to level the playing field, provide support where market gaps exist, and let the best technologies rise to the top based on merit and scalability.

    4. Support Transparency and Talent

    DOE should publicly track and report application processing times to hold itself accountable. Additionally, it should foster a culture of excellence by rewarding employees based on talent and performance, rather than just tenure. Reform should also include the ability to swiftly remove employees who consistently undercut the department’s mission of advancing U.S. energy leadership.

    The next energy revolution won’t be unleashed because of a single reform. But together, these changes would transform the Department of Energy from a slow-moving bureaucracy into a dynamic catalyst for American energy innovation.

    The private sector is ready. The resources are available. With the right reforms, DOE can help unlock the full potential of American energy, reasserting our leadership at a time when energy security, economic growth, and technological competitiveness depend on it. The time to act is now.

    Drew Bond is the Co-Founder, President & CEO of C3 Solutions. 

    Tyler Durden
    Thu, 06/26/2025 – 15:05