62.8 F
Chicago
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Home Blog Page 1617

Amazon Re-Implementing Metal Detector Screening, Registering Phones, For Warehouse Employees

Amazon Re-Implementing Metal Detector Screening, Registering Phones, For Warehouse Employees

Amazon is bringing back metal detector screenings for its 750,000 U.S. warehouse workers and will now require employees to register their phones, , according to Bloomberg

The policy, a return to pre-pandemic practices, aims to prevent theft. Workers must walk through metal detectors when leaving warehouses, and register their phones by providing the last six digits of the serial number to receive an ID sticker.

The rollout began this week at select test sites and will expand nationwide.

We’re sure the practice was halted at some point during the “summer of love” in 2020 because it somehow became (pick one: racist, sexist, pro-colonizer) to try and ensure your employees weren’t stealing from the company – as if it hasn’t been common practice in the world of retail for decades to “check bags” when employees leave stores that carry inventory. 

The Bloomberg report says that metal detectors were standard at Amazon warehouses before the pandemic but sparked controversy.

In 2014, workers sued for over $100 million in back pay, claiming they waited up to 25 minutes for screenings. The U.S. Supreme Court later ruled they weren’t owed compensation for that time.

Amazon also banned phones inside facilities pre-pandemic, requiring workers to leave them in cars or lockers. That rule was relaxed during COVID so employees could access urgent health updates.

Today, Amazon runs 110 U.S. warehouses, some over a million square feet, and employs 1.5 million people globally, making it the world’s second-largest company after Walmart.

“We’re always working to make our facilities more safe and secure for our employees and for all companies of all sizes that put their trust in us to store their inventory,”  the company told Bloomberg. 

Yes, and your transition to Foxconn is almost complete…

*  *  *

Best sellers at ZH Store last week:

FREE SHIPPING OVER $50!

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 11:45

Automaker Stellantis Says It Will Help Suppliers Pay Tariff Costs

Automaker Stellantis Says It Will Help Suppliers Pay Tariff Costs

But…but…we were told tariffs were almost assuredly inflationary? 

That doesn’t necessarily seem to be the case in the world of Stellantis and Jeep, where it appears at first glance the new cost of tariffs are being somewhat, if not totally, absorbed by the corporation. 

Stellantis, the automaker behind Jeep and Ram, said it will absorb some costs from President Trump’s new tariffs—one of the first signs of how the auto industry is bracing for the trade war, as was reported by Quartz.

The report says that the 25% tariff on imported vehicles, set to take effect within a month, is expected to sharply raise car prices. Stellantis, based in the Netherlands, told suppliers it would help offset the impact, though details remain unclear.

The move comes as Stellantis pauses production in Mexico and Canada and lays off U.S. workers.

There will be some sort of assessment of the criticality of the parts,” said Mitch Zajac, an auto industry attorney, but cautioned the company may walk back the support.

Recall we wrote hours ago that Deutsche Bank said automakers would share the burden of tariffs. They said in a note late last week that the directional takeaways they had for the auto industry going forward were “relatively unchanged” and the firm shared detail on where it believes tariff impact will land.

In an analysis covering virtually every model sold in the U.S., the bank did warn however that the fallout from protectionist policy won’t be limited to foreign automakers—it will ripple through the entire automotive ecosystem, from suppliers to consumers.

According to Deutsche, the cost of new tariffs will be shared across multiple layers: original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), end consumers, dealers, and Tier-1 suppliers.

Deutsche Bank notes, “OEMs will need to step in and absorb the tariffs for some suppliers… similar to the dynamics during COVID.”

Longer term, the bank sees a potential wave of announcements around onshoring, especially as companies seek political goodwill with the current administration. However, such structural changes—relocating supply chains, building new factories, and hiring en masse—could take years to materialize, especially in a politically uncertain environment.

Economists like Jim Rickards have argued that it’s a myth that tariffs cause inflation, making the point that inflation is mainly driven by an expanded money supply—something tariffs don’t affect. He called the idea of tariffs causing inflation “completely wrong” in a recent interview where he goes into detail about his reasoning. 

“Who actually pays the tariff? Well, the importer writes the check at the port of entry—you know, Port of L.A., Port of Houston—you’ve got to write the check to the Treasury Department for the amount of the tariffs. But who bears the cost economically? How does that cost get spread?” Rickards says. 

“The one place it does not go is to the consumer. Because if you’re a distributor—you’re, I don’t know, Walmart, Target, anybody—if you could raise prices, you would just do it. Why? Who cares about tariffs? You would just raise prices if you could. Everybody would. But they can’t.”

He continues: “The consumer’s tapped out. Credit card lines are used up, auto loan delinquencies are rising, unemployment’s going up. It’s not a nightmare, but it’s going up. Real wages are stagnant. You know, mortgage interest rates continue to remain high. Just a whole long list of reasons why the consumer’s tapped out. They can’t raise prices.”

“So who bears it? Well, they either push it back up the supply chain to the producer and say, ‘Hey, sorry producer, you have to lower your prices to me so that when we add the tariff, my net price is the same.’ Or the importer might bear part of it. Or the importer and the producer—the exporter and the importer, in other words—might share it. But either way, their gross revenues go down, their margins go down.”

“But the one person who does not pay it is the consumer. So it’s not inflationary. In fact, it could actually be deflationary if you’re forcing producers to lower their costs.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 11:05

New Dilemma For Wall Street Billionaires: MAG7 Or MAGA 

New Dilemma For Wall Street Billionaires: MAG7 Or MAGA 

The Democratic Party has been pushing a narrative that President Trump is favoring his billionaire friends while leaving Main Street in the gutter. But if that’s the case, why are some of the president’s billionaire supporters complaining about the severity of his tariffs as main equity indices tumble worldwide? 

In recent days, a video posted on TikTok and reposted on X shows Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) maneuvering around a ‘gotcha moment’ question from a journalist and pointed out how the American worker finally has a president “that has their backs – protecting their jobs and raising their wages – and someone has to fight for fair trade deals.” 

The journalist then asked Hawley: “Even though markets are falling – and the economy looks pretty concerning right now?” 

Hawley fired back: “Wall Street banks don’t like it [tariffs] – but I’m not too concerned about Wall Street. I’m concerned about working people in my state. And this is finally a chance to get a fair deal on trade.” 

The deepening trade war has battered stocks as President Trump pushes for fair trade with key partners like China. The latest Bloomberg data shows that year-to-date losses among billionaires have been nothing short of a bloodbath.

The average net worth of the top 100 billionaires has slid since President Trump announced the “Liberation Day” tariff blitz nearly one week ago. 

Trump’s pro-worker, protectionist policies—aimed at defending American jobs, fulfilling the ‘America First’ agenda, and revitalizing U.S. manufacturing—have prompted concern from a number of billionaires, mainly because their net worth is heavily tied to the stock market. 

Citing a list from Forbes, Elon Musk, Bill Ackman, Mark Cuban, Jamie Dimon, and other billionaires have questioned Trump’s approach on the trade war:

  • Elon Musk: Trump’s new right-hand-man hasn’t explicitly spoken out against the tariffs, but the Tesla CEO shared a video early Monday of economist Milton Friedman touting free trade and the benefits of importing goods. He also deleted a post from over the weekend criticizing Trump’s top trade adviser Peter Navarro for praising tariffs. Musk’s brother (and Tesla board member) Kimbal Musk also criticized the tariffs as a “permanent tax” on Americans.

  • Jamie Dimon: The JPMorganChase CEO issued his annual letter to shareholders Monday morning, which expressed concerns about Trump’s tariffs, saying that while there are some “legitimate reasons” for imposing them, they “will likely increase inflation and are causing many to consider a greater probability of a recession” and expressing concerns about the continued uncertainties around Trump’s tariffs and how they will “affect America’s long-term economic alliances.”

  • Bill Ackman: The hedge fund manager is a longtime Trump supporter but has turned against the president’s tariffs, railing against Trump’s Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and how the Trump administration calculated the tariffs and calling for the White House to pause them, writing Sunday that if the tariffs do take effect, “We are heading for a self-induced, economic nuclear winter, and we should start hunkering down.”

  • Daniel Loeb: While Loeb said in February he thought Trump’s initial tariffs on Mexico and Canada wouldn’t harm the stock market, the hedge fund manager has spoken out against Trump’s more sweeping policy, most recently sharing a post Monday that noted the stock market chaos is “all in the head of 1 person. Who can change his mind at any time” and writing, “Exactly.”

  • Larry Fink: The BlackRock CEO suggested at the Economic Club of New York Monday that “the economy is weakening as we speak” and the market could fall another 20% from where it is now as a result of Trump’s tariffs, CNBC reports. Fink suggested the U.S. is “probably in a recession right now,” but he still expressed some optimism about the economy’s long-term outlook, saying, “In the long run, this is actually more of a buying opportunity than a selling opportunity” and “the vitality of the United States will persist.”

Expanding more on Ackman’s comments on X earlier, he advocated for a “30, 60, or 90-day pause before the tariffs are implemented tomorrow to enable negotiations to be completed without a major global economic disruption that will harm the most vulnerable companies and citizens of our country.” 

So, who exactly benefits from an immediate pause in the trade war? Primarily those who own large amounts of stock—billionaires like Bill Ackman—not the average worker, who owns little to nothing.

Separate from the list is billionaire Ken Griffin, who blasted Trump’s latest tariffs as a tax on the middle class, calling it a “huge policy mistake.”

“Even if the dream of jobs coming back to America plays out, that’s a 20-year dream. It’s not 20 weeks. It’s not two years. It’s decades,” Griffin said.

Maybe we should remind the billionaires about Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s comments last week, pointing out that stocks first began to sink with China’s “DeepSeek” moment earlier this year, calling the latest downturn “A MAG7 problem, not a MAGA problem.”

Which way, Wall Street? MAG7 or MAGA? 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 10:25

This Again: Fauci Touts “The Next Outbreak”

This Again: Fauci Touts “The Next Outbreak”

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Footage has emerged of Anthony Fauci telling an audience at the New Orleans Book Festival, where he was hawking his COVID book, that there will be a new pandemic in the near future, and that it will be a new respiratory virus with a higher rate of morbidity than COVID.

“The next outbreak will be of a respiratory disease that’s easily transmissible, that has a significant degree of morbidity,” Fauci asserted.

The last one wasn’t an outbreak, it came out of a lab where people you funded were f*cking around with pathogens to make them more deadly to humans.

Does this guy ever stop?

The last one wasn’t an outbreak, it came out of a lab where people you funded were f*cking around with pathogens to make them more deadly to humans.

Does this guy ever stop?

Aw hell no, we’re not doing this again.

It sounds like a threat.

He predicted COVID two years before it happened.

All he does is salivate over the next pandemic.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 10:05

MAGA Vs Libertarians: Peter Schiff and America-First Economist Face Off On Tariffs

MAGA Vs Libertarians: Peter Schiff and America-First Economist Face Off On Tariffs

Is Trump in the process of a brilliant negotiation or attempting to permanently raise tariffs in a painful bid to restore American manufacturing? Are you willing to pay higher prices so Americans have jobs, so the U.S. is economically independent from other countries?

As that internal debate rages within his cabinet, tonight will see a free trade libertarian clash with a protectionist MAGA economist:

Visit the ZeroHedge homepage tonight at 7pm ET for our live Tariff Debate, with die-hard Austrian Peter Schiff facing off against Spencer Morrison, editor-in-chief of National Economics Editorials. The debate will be moderated by friend of ZH George Gammon, host of the Rebel Capitalist podcast.

While often allied on foreign policy, see how each camp differs on this key economic question.

The Libertarian View: Trade Benefits All

It’s not the consumer who holds the cards but the producer, and buying cheap products from other countries that specialize in making them allows Americans to live beyond their means, Schiff would argue. Plus the current regulatory environment — minimum wage, high taxes, strict labor liability laws — make it very costly to do business in the U.S. which high tariffs does not change.

Tariffs harm Americans more than the countries they are aimed at, he argues. Schiff’s prediction: major pain incoming to the U.S. dollar and the American consumer.

The MAGA View: We Are Being Ripped Off

We hear Trump say that other countries are “ripping us off” given the U.S. has large trade deficits and often lopsided tariffs or import regulations. The attitude from the MAGA camp — now echoed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and others — is that access to the wealthy American consumer is a privilege that other countries should pay for.

Tonight’s debater Morrison, author of “Reshore”, says that “tariffs are the price foreigners must pay to sell their goods in America”.

Rather than maximizing economic efficiency, Morrison advocates that economic policy “serve the American people—our security, wellbeing, and natural environment.”

We’ll see you tonight at 7pm ET.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 09:45

“We Are Waiting For Their Call”: US Futures Hit Session High After Trump Talks China Deal

“We Are Waiting For Their Call”: US Futures Hit Session High After Trump Talks China Deal

Update (1920ET): President Donald Trump sent futures accelerating to the upside on Tuesday after suggesting on Truth Social that China “wants to make a deal, badly, but they don’t know how to get it started.”

“We are waiting for their call,” Trump continued, adding “It will happen!”

The comments come after China threatened various “countermeasures” in response to US tariffs – including increasing counter-tariffs on US agricultural products, prohibiting the import of US poultry, suspending China-US cooperation on fentanyl, restricting corporate trade, banning the import of American films, and reassessing the benefit US companies have gained from intellectual property in China.

“If the US escalates its tariff measures, China will resolutely take countermeasures to safeguard its own rights and interests,” a ministry spokesperson said on Monday. “The US threat to escalate tariffs against China is a mistake on top of a mistake, which once again exposes the US’s blackmailing nature. China will never accept this. If the US insists on going its own way, China will fight it to the end.”

“The US hegemonic move in the name of ‘reciprocity’ serves its selfish interests at the expense of other countries’ legitimate interests and puts ‘America first’ over international rules,” embassy spokesman Liu Pengyu said in response to a question on the latest US move.

“China will firmly safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” he said, without specifying any actions.

Needless to say – after China’s threats, markets are so far pleased at Trump’s response…

*  *  *

Best sellers at ZH Store last week:

FREE SHIPPING OVER $50!

*  *  *

US Equity futures are accelerating gains following comments by US Treasury Secretary Bessent this morning that tariff negotiations are the result of massive inbound calls, not the market.

  • When asked about tax with Europe, says “everything is on the table.”

  • Trump will be personally involved in negotiations.

  • Japan, South Korea and Taiwan may be engaged in Alaska deal (Early March, Trump said Japan, south Korea and others want to partner with US in a gigantic natural gas pipeline in Alaska).

  • If they are successful, tariffs would be a melting ice cube in a way.

  • Have discussed which countries to prioritize. Japan would get priority after swiftly reaching out to the US.

  • If there are solid proposals, could end up with some good deals.

  • As part of calculus with deals, some part of tariffs may stay on.

  • Bessent was not involved in the calculations of the tariff numbers.

  • Thinks escalation by China was a big mistake.

  • China has chosen to isolate itself by retaliating and doubling down on previous negative behavior.

  • US President Trump is committed to fixing trade imbalances.

The reaction was positive to Bessent’s comments:

Watch Bessent’s full interview here:The President has maximum negotiating leverage. Many of our trading partners have not escalated, and they will get priority in the queue. I think it was a big mistake, this Chinese escalation.”

Is the short-squeeze back sustainable?

Politico reports that Bessent is having some success steering the White House tariff messaging away from permanence and toward negotiations after warning Trump of further market losses.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 09:20

“Tariff War Just Begun”: Beijing’s Counter-Tariff Options Against Trump Leaked By Bloggers

“Tariff War Just Begun”: Beijing’s Counter-Tariff Options Against Trump Leaked By Bloggers

On Monday, President Trump threatened China with an additional 50% tariff on goods imported into the U.S. if Beijing didn’t withdraw its 34% counter-tariff. Hours later, China’s Ministry of Commerce vowed to take “countermeasures” and said it “will fight to the end” of the trade war. Two top Chinese bloggers leaked some of those potential countermeasures on Tuesday. 

A flurry of headlines overnight helped stabilize Asian equity markets. According to Goldman analyst Shubham Ghosh, some of those headlines included, “Consumption boost, leadership onshore willing to front-load stimulus, PBOC vowing sufficient funding, all adding up.” 

“Onshore A-shs had a much better price action where the start was slow and it gradually picked up momentum towards the close – National team support speculated as notably combined turnover of the ETFs favoured by them hit a massive 92 bn Yuan,” Ghosh told clients. 

We detailed overnight the commerce ministry’s threat to take “countermeasures” to defend its “rights and interests” should Trump fire off another round of tariffs. One key line from the ministry should keep traders up at night:

“China will never accept this. If the U.S. insists on going its own way, China will fight it to the end.”

In addition to the commerce ministry’s comments, two top Chinese bloggers have potentially leaked Beijing’s next moves, which could target everything from U.S. poultry and agricultural goods to Hollywood films—and even include a suspension of China-U.S. cooperation on fentanyl-related issues.

Bloomberg noted that Liu Hong, a senior editor at Chinese media outlet Xinhuanet, and Chairman Rabbit, the social media handle for Ren Yi, the Harvard University-educated grandson of former Guangdong party chief Ren Zhongyi, released an identical set of countermeasures that Beijing has mulled over to counter Trump. 

Hong operates the account Niutanqin, which listed the potential countermeasures:

We have also received some latest news on specific countermeasures against US tariffs . China has prepared at least six major measures.

1. Significantly increase tariffs on U.S. agricultural products such as soybeans and sorghum.

Sources said that in view of the recent bullying behavior of the United States, China is considering significantly increasing tariffs on U.S. agricultural products such as soybeans and sorghum.

2. Prohibit the import of U.S. poultry meat into China.

Sources pointed out that in view of the frequent outbreaks of avian influenza in the United States, relevant parties strongly recommended that China ban the import of American poultry to ensure the food safety of the Chinese people.

3. Suspend China-US cooperation on fentanyl.

It was revealed that the Chinese government is considering stopping its fentanyl cooperation with the U.S. due to the U.S.’s threat to impose another 50% tariff. The reason is simple: the U.S. has completely ignored China’s humanitarian assistance, not only does it not understand China’s sincerity and goodwill, but it has also smeared, blamed and shifted the blame, which has seriously damaged the foundation of China-US fentanyl cooperation.

4. Countermeasures in the services trade sector.

The source also revealed that this includes restricting U.S. companies from participating in procurement and restricting business cooperation such as legal consulting. The U.S. has a long-term trade surplus in services with China, and the so-called “reciprocal tariffs” of the U.S. government will undoubtedly bring serious crisis to the U.S. service exports, which currently have a huge trade surplus.

5. Ban the import of American films.

According to relevant experts, in view of the U.S. threat to escalate tariffs on China , relevant departments are studying reducing or even banning the import of American films.

6. Investigate the benefits that U.S. companies have gained from intellectual property in China.

According to sources, in view of the huge monopoly profits obtained by relevant U.S. companies in China, relevant departments are studying to investigate the above situation.

“After all, China today is no longer the China of 100 years ago, 40 years ago, or four years ago. We have experienced too many ups and downs. We know clearly that we still face many challenges and difficulties, but we believe that we are on the right side of history,” the Niutanqin account said.

Niutanqin warned: “If you mess around, you will have to pay for it. The storm brought to the United States by the tariff war has just begun.” 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 07:20

“Outlook Negative From Here”: Goldman Finds Frontloading Party Is Over

“Outlook Negative From Here”: Goldman Finds Frontloading Party Is Over

Over the past year, U.S. importers have been frontloading shipments—ranging from e-commerce goods and small appliances to soft goods and replacement parts—across Transpacific trade lanes in anticipation of President Trump’s tariff threats. 

With Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff blitz passed and the potential for even more tariffs ahead, signs are emerging that cargo flows across Transpacific routes are slowing. In fact, Goldman Sachs now expects the freight volume outlook could turn negative from here.

Goldman’s Patrick Creuset, Theodora Beadle, and others told clients Monday that first-quarter freight volumes remained solid. However, they noted this was primarily because of frontloading goods ahead of tariffs, and now, because of the deepening trade war, “the volume outlook is clearly negative from here.” 

Creuset provided more color about the inflection point for the Transpacific tradelane:

Q1 freight volume data remained fairly strong, with Ocean volumes up c.5% on our readings for Jan/Feb, and China port volumes up 10%yoy, while air cargo is up low single digits following a strong Q4 peak. However, we believe a lot of this reflects frontloading of U.S. imports as we have highlighted in prior editions.

As U.S. tariff increases are set to take effect in April (and potential retaliation from trade partners) the volume outlook is clearly negative from here, in particular on the Transpacific tradelane. Prior to the latest tariff announcements, U.S. retailers were expecting a mid-single digit yoy import decline by June Exhibit 2 following the recent re-stocking Exhibit 21.

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 21

The analysts then asked question of how severe the slowdown will be—and what it could mean for freight rates:

We believe the most likely scenario for ocean freight markets is a decline in Transpacific volumes driving further rate declines from still elevated levels Exhibit 35; this in turn will lead carriers to reduce capacity and hand back charters.

Key questions are:

  • the magnitude of the volume decline

  • the pace and magnitude of capacity cuts – there is a lot of headroom to cut, at least 5% of global capacity in our view Exhibit 43 but will depend on competitive dynamics amid the new alliance structure

  • whether vessels taken out of the Transpac are idled and scrapped, or cascaded into North-South trades (depressing rates there), and

  • the extent of negative demand spillovers to RoW from weaker U.S. trade and growth. The impact from overcapacity in ocean will also be deflationary on air cargo, where slowing volume growth predates the latest tariff measures Exhibit 5.

The slowdown on Transpacific tradelanes also comes as Goldman’s chief economist Jan Hatzius downshifted his U.S. economic growth forecast in a note titled “US Daily: Countdown to Recession.” 

Here are the highlights of Hatzius’ note:

  • We are lowering our 2025 Q4/Q4 GDP growth forecast to 0.5% and raising our 12-month recession probability from 35% to 45% following a sharp tightening in financial conditions, foreign consumer boycotts, and a continued spike in policy uncertainty that is likely to depress capital spending by more than we had previously assumed. This baseline forecast still rests on our standing assumption that the effective U.S. tariff rate will rise by 15pp in total, which would now require a large reduction in the tariffs scheduled to take effect on April 9.

  • If most of the April 9 tariffs do take effect, then the effective tariff rate will rise by an estimated 20pp once those increases and likely sectoral tariffs take effect, even allowing for some country-specific agreements at a later date. If so, we expect to change our forecast to a recession.

  • In our current non-recession baseline, we expect the Fed to deliver a package of three consecutive 25bp insurance cuts starting in June (vs. July previously), lowering the funds rate to 3.5-3.75%. In a recession scenario, we would instead expect the Fed to cut by around 200bp over the next year. Our probability-weighted Fed forecast now implies 130bp of rate cuts this year (up from 105bp previously, reflecting the increase in our probability of recession), similar to market pricing as of Friday’s close.

Making matters worse, President Turmp on Monday threatened to “impose ADDITIONAL Tariffs on China of 50%” unless Beijing withdraws a 34% retaliatory duty on U.S. goods (read full note: Trump Threatens China Escalation, White House Denies ’90-Day-Pause’ “Fake News”).

“If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long term trading abuses by tomorrow, April 8th, 2025, the United States will impose ADDITIONAL Tariffs on China of 50%, effective April 9th,” Trump posted on social media.

The president also said “all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated!”

“Negotiations with other countries, which have also requested meetings, will begin taking place immediately,” he added

Additionally, Trump said that all talks with China will be terminated.

The takeaway: Frontloading by importers is subsiding and can exert deflationary pressure on the shipping industry. It also suggests broader growth drag and heightened recession risk. The question remains if Trump can solve trade disputes with top trading partners in a timely fashion. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 06:55

The American Jacobin: How Some On The Left Have Found Release In An Age Of Rage

The American Jacobin: How Some On The Left Have Found Release In An Age Of Rage

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

“We should replace our piece of crap Constitution.”

Those words from author Elie Mystal, a regular commentator on MSNBC, are hardly surprising from someone who previously called the Constitution “trash” and urged not just the abolition of the U.S. Senate but also of “all voter registration laws.”

But Mystal’s radical rhetoric is becoming mainstream on the left, as shown by his best-selling books and popular media appearances.

There is a counter-constitutional movement building in law schools and across the country. And although Mystal has not advocated violence, some on the left are turning to political violence and criminal acts. It is part of the “righteous rage” that many of them see as absolving them from the basic demands not only of civility but of legality.

They are part of a rising class of American Jacobins — bourgeois revolutionaries increasingly prepared to trash everything, from cars to the Constitution.

The Jacobins were a radical group in France that propelled that country into the worst excesses of the French Revolution. They were largely affluent citizens, including journalists, professors, lawyers, and others who shredded existing laws and destroyed property. It would ultimately lead not only to the blood-soaked “Reign of Terror” but also to the demise of the Jacobins themselves as more radical groups turned against them.

Of course, it is not revolution on the minds of most of these individuals. It is rage.

Rage is the ultimate drug. It offers a release from longstanding social norms — a license to do those things long repressed by individuals who viewed themselves as decent, law-abiding citizens.

Across the country, liberals are destroying Tesla cars, torching dealerships and charging stations, and even allegedly hitting political dissenters with their cars.

Last week, affluent liberal shoppers admitted that they are shoplifting from Whole Foods to strike back at Jeff Bezos for working with the Trump administration and moving the Washington Post back to the political center. 

They are also enraged at Mark Zuckerberg for restoring free speech protections at Meta.

One “20-something communications professional” in Washington explained “If a billionaire can steal from me, I can scrape a little off the top, too.”  These affluent shoplifters portrayed themselves as Robin Hoods.

Of course, that is assuming Robin Hood was stealing organic fruit from the rich and giving it to himself.

On college campuses, affluent students and even professors are engaging in political violence.

Just this week, University of Wisconsin Professor José Felipe Alvergue, head of the English Department, turned over the table of College Republicans supporting a conservative for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. He reportedly declared, “The time for this is over!”

Likewise, a mob this week attacked a conservative display and tent on the campus of the University of California-Davis as campus police passively watched. The Antifa protesters, carrying a large banner with the slogan “ACAB” or “all cops are bastards,” trashed the tent and carried it off.

Antifa is a violent and vehemently anti-free speech group that thrives on U.S. college campuses. In his book “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” Mark Bray explains that “most Americans in Antifa have been anarchists or antiauthoritarian communists. … From that standpoint, ‘free speech’ as such is merely a bourgeois fantasy unworthy of consideration.”

Of course, many of the American Jacobins are themselves bourgeois or even affluent figures. And they are finding a host of enablers telling them that the Constitution itself is a threat and that the legal system has been corrupted by oligarchs, white supremacists, or reactionaries.

This includes leading academics and commentators who are denouncing the Constitution and core American values. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley Law School, is the author of “No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States.”

In a New York Times op-ed, “The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed,” law professors Ryan D. Doerfler of Harvard and Samuel Moyn of Yale called for the nation to “reclaim America from constitutionalism.”

Commentator Jennifer Szalai has scoffed at what she called “Constitution worship.” “Americans have long assumed that the Constitution could save us,” she wrote. “A growing chorus now wonders whether we need to be saved from it.”

As intellectuals knock down our laws and Constitution, radicals are pouring into the breach. Political violence and rage rhetoric are becoming more common. Some liberals embraced groups like Antifa, while others shrugged off property damage and violent threats against political opponents. It is the very type of incitement or rage rhetoric that Democrats once accused Trump of fostering in groups like the Proud Boys.

Members of Congress such as Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) have called for Tesla CEO Elon Musk to be “taken down” and said that Democrats have to be “OK with punching.”

Some take such words as a justification to violently attack a system supposedly advancing the white supremacy or fascism. Fortunately, such violence has been confined so far to a minority of radicalized individuals, but there is an undeniable increase in such violent, threatening speech and in actual violence.

The one thing the American Jacobins will not admit is that they like the rage and the release that it brings them. From shoplifting to arson to attempted assassination, the rejection of our legal system brings them freedom to act outside of morality and to take whatever they want.

Democratic leaders see these “protests” as needed popularism to combat Trump — to make followers “strike ready” and “to stand up and fight back.”

For a politician, a mob can become irresistible if you can steer it against your opponents. The problem is controlling the mob once it has broken free of the bounds of legal and personal accountability.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 06:30

Indian Components Found In Russian Weapons On Battlefield For First Time, Ukraine Says

Indian Components Found In Russian Weapons On Battlefield For First Time, Ukraine Says

Ukraine’s military intelligence has said that an Indian-made component was identified in a Russian weapon system for the first time of the war, but added in the statement that all almost all American-made parts appear to have been phased out.

“For the first time, a component made in India — a clock buffer from Aura Semiconductor — was found in a Russian weapon,” the statement from military intelligence (HUR) said, per a Monday Telegram post.

Debris of a Shahed 136 kamikaze drone launched by Russia, Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images.

Ukrainian intel has documented nearly 200 newly identified parts across six types of Russian weaponry, regional media reports say.

“These include the CRP antenna from the Russian-modified Shahed drone, North Korea’s KN-24 ballistic missile, the onboard computer in the X-47 Kinzhal missile, and several reconnaissance and attack drones — including the Supercam S350, Gerbera, and Zala,” writes Kyiv Independent.

India and Russia have for years had a strong arms trade relationship. Since the Ukraine war started, most international scrutiny has been on Iran, which has become a top drone supplier of Russia, particularly the Shahed-136 drone, which has seen wide use in Ukraine’s skies.

As for India, it has long presented a careful public stance of urging swift diplomatic resolution to the war, but has never outright condemned Moscow for the invasion. China too has long been a key external power helping to prop up Russia’s defense industrial sector through dual use products.

Meanwhile, Russia’s military continues making gains on the battlefield. According Russia’s Defense Ministry:

“Battlegroup West units liberated the settlement of Katerinovka in the Donetsk People’s Republic through decisive operations,” the ministry said in a statement.

Pressure is being put on nearby settlements as well, as Ukrainian media acknowledges: 

Russian armed forces are intensifying offensive actions on the Lyman front section in eastern Ukraine. As reported by the Ukrainian analytical project DeepState, the town of Lyman, located north of Kramatorsk, is a key point in the Donetsk region, which remains under Kyiv’s control.

Ukrainian drones have at the same time continued being launched into Russia. On Monday the southwest Russian area of Krasnodar Krai was targeted, resulting in damage to railway infrastructure.

Daily exchanges of drone and missile attacks across the Russia-Ukraine border have long been a daily occurrence. Despite a ceasefire in place for energy sites, there still doesn’t seem to be much in the way of restraint by either side.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/08/2025 – 05:45