63.6 F
Chicago
Friday, September 25, 2026
Home Blog Page 1694

Stranded Astronauts Depart ISS As SpaceX Rescue Mission Begins Trip Home

Stranded Astronauts Depart ISS As SpaceX Rescue Mission Begins Trip Home

NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore are finally returning home after what was supposed to be a week-long mission in a Boeing Starliner spacecraft left them stranded on the International Space Station for nine months. The toxic political environment further prolonged their extended stay under the Biden-Harris regime.

NASA astronauts Nick Hague and Roscosmos cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov also joined Williams and Wilmore aboard a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that undocked from the ISS early Tuesday morning.

 “NASA’s Crew-9 return coverage will resume at 4:45 p.m. Tuesday on NASA+ until Dragon splashes down at approximately 5:57 p.m. off the coast of Florida, and crew members are safely recovered,” the space agency wrote in a statement.

Days ago, Williams and Wilmore thanked Elon Musk for deploying a Dragon capsule to rescue them after their Boeing Starliner spacecraft malfunctioned last summer.

Due to Musk’s DOGE efforts, the rescue mission has been widely ignored by the leftist conspiracy networks on corporate television. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 06:55

Professors Claim Musk’s Cybertruck Reminiscent Of Apartheid-Enforcing Vehicle In South Africa

Professors Claim Musk’s Cybertruck Reminiscent Of Apartheid-Enforcing Vehicle In South Africa

Via The College Fix,

A pair of Rice University professors say Elon Musk’s Tesla Cybertruck is reminiscent of a vehicle that “patrolled and terrorized” black townships in apartheid South Africa.

As such, Professors Vivian Chenxue Lu and Nana Osei-Opare write in Slate that the Cybertruck’s similarities to the Casspir military vehicle (pictured, below) — intentional or not — “blur the boundaries between the battlefield and the public street.”

“[T]he Cybertruck’s harsh, sharp edges remind us […] of something from the past: the larger armored personnel vehicles that patrolled streets throughout Musk’s youth in apartheid South Africa,” the professors write.

“By the 1990s, the Casspir had become an iconic global symbol of apartheid oppression.”

Lu and Osei-Opare do their very best to link Musk to the Casspir, noting he “likely” would have seen the vehicle in his youth … around the time of the Soweto uprising.

However, Musk never had to travel in the Casspir, as he departed South Africa a year before he could be conscripted into the South African Defence Force.

Still, the Casspir was used by the United States military during the second Gulf War and invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and is now utilized by various police departments in the U.S.

Lu and Osei-Opare note the Casspir was part of the “spectacular use of force” shown in Ferguson, Missouri during Black Lives Matter protests.

Although the Cybertruck is “not designed for actual combat,” the professors further claim the vehicle capitalizes on the “romanticized frontier violence and militarism” of American pop culture:

Its marketing, for example, explicitly taps into the current apocalyptic visions pervading both right- and left-wing political imaginaries—from climate disaster to nuclear, civil, and class warfare. Heralded as being “built for any planet,” it showcases a Bioweapon Defense Mode and a “built-in hospital grade HEPA filter” that “helps provide protection from 99.97% of airborne particles.” One third-party Tesla modification company, aimed at civilian and government clients, sells Cybertruck upgrades so it can run on jet fuel, diesel, biodiesel, and electricity.

The idea that a Cybertruck could become an artillery vehicle is not just hypothetical. Unsanctioned by Tesla, various users, ranging from a YouTuber to Chechen forces fighting for Russia in Ukraine, have modified a Cybertruck by mounting machine guns to its bed, turning it into a lightly armored weaponized machine.

“Whether or not Musk or the Cybertruck’s designers made a conscious decision to draw inspiration from the Casspir,” the authors conclude, the vehicle’s “pseudo-futuristic vision is militaristic, stainless-steel fortified, masculinist, individualistic, and unforgiving.

“Whether through Casspirs or the Cybertruck, apartheid’s militarized, cultural, and psychological legacy roams our streets.”

According to her faculty page, Lu’s (pictured) work focuses on the “cultural politics of profit, transnational commerce, ethnonationalism, and diaspora.”

Osei-Opare has written about “black radicals’ relationship to Marxist-Leninism,” “labor and labor agitation in postcolonial Africa,” and “the insertion of white supremacy and racism as an analytical category into the Cold War theoretical paradigm.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 06:30

Visualizing The Religious Landscape Of The US

Visualizing The Religious Landscape Of The US

Key Takeaways

  • Christian Majority – 63% of U.S. adults identify as Christian, with Evangelical Protestants (23%) and Catholics (19%) as the largest groups.

  • Growing Unaffiliated – Nearly 1 in 3 Americans (30%) are religiously unaffiliated.

  • Despite its dominance, the share of Christians has decreased from 78% in 2007 to 63% in 2024.

The Religious Landscape Study (RLS) was conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2007, 2014, and 2023–24. The study, visualized below by Visual Capitalist’s Bruno Venditti, surveys more than 35,000 Americans across all 50 states about their religious affiliations.

Christianity in the U.S.

After many years of steady decline, the share of Americans who identify as Christian shows signs of leveling off—at least temporarily.

According to the study, the percentage of U.S. adults identifying as Christian declined from 78% in 2007 to 63% in 2023-24. Since 2020, the percentage has remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 62% and 64%.

The largest Christian subgroups in the United States are Protestants, who now make up 40% of U.S. adults, and Catholics at 19%. An additional 3% identify with other Christian groups, including the Greek and Russian Orthodox Churches, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and others.

Both Protestant and Catholic numbers have declined significantly since 2007. However, the Protestant share of the population has remained relatively steady since 2019, while the Catholic share has stabilized since 2014.

Meanwhile, the percentage of Americans identifying with a religion other than Christianity has been gradually increasing, though it remains in the single digits.

Religiously unaffiliated adults—those who identify as atheists, agnostics or as “nothing in particular” when asked about their religion—account for 30% of the population.

The world’s three largest religions have a combined 5 billion followers. To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s most popular religions.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 05:45

Lithuania Says Russian Intelligence Behind IKEA Arson Attack

Lithuania Says Russian Intelligence Behind IKEA Arson Attack

On Monday Lithuanian prosecutors issued formal findings from a long-running arson investigation which goes back to May of last year.

The statement accused Russian intelligence of being behind an arson attack on an IKEA store in Vilnius last year, calling it “an act of terrorism.” Prosecutor Arturas Urbelis told reporters, “This is connected with the military intelligence, with the security services.”

“We regard this act as an act of terrorism with serious consequences,” Urbelis continued. Amid a spate of mysterious arson attacks on European soil throughout last year, Lituanian authorities say they’ve found “reasonable grounds” to believe that unspecified Russian “military structures and security services” organized and financed the attack on the Ikea store.

The fire, which targeted the Swedish retailer store in the Lithuanian capital on the May 9, 2024, resulted in no casualties. Interestingly, the two prime suspects taken into custody are actually Ukrainian citizens.

“It has been established that through a series of intermediaries… the organizers of these crimes are in Russia and this is connected to military intelligence and security forces,” the prosecutor’s office continued, describing a ‘destabilization’ campaign in Europe.

According to more details in regional media:

The prosecutor’s office said one suspect entered Poland in early 2024 and, during a secret meeting in Warsaw, agreed to set fire to and bomb shopping centers in Lithuania and Latvia in exchange for 10,000 euros ($10,904).

“More than one supermarket has been set on fire, and not just supermarkets,” Urbelis said when asked about possible links to similar arson attacks in Poland.

“It is obvious that the persons we have identified, the perpetrators and the intermediaries, are also linked to the criminal acts committed in Poland,” he added.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk echoed the allegations, directly addressing allies on X…

Poland’s Tusk appears to be actually trying to use this to derail Trump-backed peace talks: “Good to know before negotiations. Such is the nature of this state [Russia],” he said in the post.

There have also throughout the Ukraine war been ‘mystery fires’ inside Russia as well, particularly targeting defense and energy sector buildings. To some extent, both sides could be waging sabotage campaigns against the other at this point.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 04:15

The Shakespeare National Trust Determines That The Bard ‘Is Not To Be’

The Shakespeare National Trust Determines That The Bard ‘Is Not To Be’

Authored by Andrea Widburg via AmericanThinker.com,

William Shakespeare has long been considered one of England’s great men because of his extraordinary output of timeless plays and sonnets. 

They that shaped the English language as well as exporting ideas about British culture…not because the Brits foisted his works on others, but because others recognized their beauty and universality.

Now, though, the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, as part of the nation’s push for national suicide, which is the premier Shakespeare organization in England, has decided that Shakespeare is just too…English, and that’s bad. 

In answer to Hamlet’s question (“to be or not to be”), the Trust has determined that Shakespeare is not to be.

Once, every educated person had seen or read at least some Shakespeare plays. His comedies made us laugh, his histories taught us about the nature of power and reminded us that those who are high can be brought low and vice versa, and his tragedies’ continued popularity revealed that the human condition is unchanging and that human folly brings disaster in its wake.

Yes, these plays were set in England (even the plays set in Italy or ancient Rome were still set in England), but they had a universality that saw them rise above time and place. Add in Shakespeare’s exquisite prose, which shaped the English language for centuries after he died, and you had something that made, and should still make, the British very proud.

However, as Shakespeare himself knew, human folly remains constant, and nothing reveals greater folly than the left’s march on Western culture.

Britain definitely did bad things over the centuries. After all, it kicked every Jew out of England for hundreds of years (so Shakespeare had never seen a Jew when he created Shylock) it was one of the major participants in the African slave trade, it was one of the world’s major colonizers, and it treated factory workers badly during the beginning of the industrial revolution. Bad Britain!

But, because events must be understood within the times in which they occur, the entire medieval world was antisemitic, every nation in the history of humankind relied on slavery, every powerful nation in the history of world practiced colonialism, and all Western nations allowed workers to be abused in the early days of industrialism. In other words, Britain was no worse than the nations around her.

When Britain was good, though, she was very, very good. It was Britain’s Great Awakening, a religious crisis of conscience, that led to the abolition of slavery, the end of child labor, and the general improvement of working conditions.

And while Britain was a colonialist, Niall Ferguson has pointed out something fascinating: Former British colonies, wherever they are in the world, have thrived, exceeding nations in their regions that others had colonized (and everyone was colonizing everyone, whether Western, Asian, or Muslim). In other words, while we moderns can rant against the evils of colonization, everyone was doing it, and the lucky nations got England as their rulers.

Here in America, a former British colony that rose to be the most successful nation in the world, we thrived because the British gave us their ideas about individual liberty. Thank you, Britain! We parted ways with you when you abandoned your own principles, but we kept the principles.

In other words, England’s history is a mixed bag but it was better than most—and the British, while they shouldn’t deny the bad, should mostly be proud of the good.

But now, having drowned itself in a sea of leftism, and imported millions of people who believe that their culture (Islam) is infinitely superior to that of their new home, Britain has determined that Shakespeare, who was practically the avatar of the best of Britain, must be jettisoned. To that end, his birthplace will be cleansed of Britain’s “colonialist” stain:

William Shakespeare’s birthplace is being “decolonised” following concerns about the playwright being used to promote “white supremacy”.

[snip]

It is now “decolonising” its vast collection to “create a more inclusive museum experience”.

This process includes exploring “the continued impact of Empire” on the collection, the “impact of colonialism” on world history, and how “Shakespeare’s work has played a part in this”.

[snip]

The process of “decolonising”, which typically means moving away from Western perspectives, comes after concerns were raised that Shakespeare’s genius was used to advance ideas about “white supremacy”.

The claims were made in a 2022 collaborative research project between the trust and Dr Helen Hopkins, an academic at the University of Birmingham.

The problem was that the Trust dared present Shakespeare’s ideas as genius universal ruminations about power, folly, love, and tragedy. Nothing, it seems, could be more evil:

“This idea of Shakespeare’s universal genius ‘benefits the ideology of white European supremacy’, it was claimed.”

The audacity! What this means is that those who dare admire Shakespeare are guilty of “white Anglo-centric, Eurocentric, and increasingly ‘West-centric’ worldviews that continue to do harm in the world today.”  This admiration causes “epistemic violence” (a nonsense phrase meaning it makes leftists sad).

In an interview with Laura Ingraham, JD Vance warned that “Europe is at risk of engaging in civilizational suicide.” He spoke in terms of open borders and totalitarian speech control. He’s right, of course. But those are the manifestations of something deeper: For over 100 years, leftists have brainwashed Europeans into believing that the civilization they built is so flawed that their very existence is evil. Marinated in those beliefs, civilizational suicide is the only reasonable option.

And so, the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, which once existed to celebrate Britain’s greatest man of letters, must now go out of its way to expose the evil inherent in his work.

What’s happening at Shakespeare’s birthplace is another reason America really needs to pull out of NATO, because there’s nothing left in Europe to defend. We are simply giving money to people who hate the West and America, and who are dedicating themselves to the downfall of both.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 03:30

Germany Pledges Hundreds Of Millions To Syrian Regime Despite Sectarian Massacres 

Germany Pledges Hundreds Of Millions To Syrian Regime Despite Sectarian Massacres 

Sectarian mass killings in Syria have been going on for over a week at this point. Armed men affiliated with self-declared President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s security forces (Jolani’s HTS/AQ-linked militants) have killed thousands of Alawites and in some cases Christians.

Reports from last week also said Jolani’s radical Sunni gangs are burning fields and forests in order to smoke out Alawite families in hiding, literally hunting down the Alawite minorities. Thousands are still taking shelter at a Russian airbase on the coast, afraid to return to their homes.

Apparently this genocide doesn’t matter to Germany’s leaders, who on Monday declared they are pledging an additional €300 million ($326 million) in aid, much of which will go to the government – though not all.

Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said at a press conference ahead of an EU-led donor conference in Brussels that over half of it will bypass the interim government of Jolani, to be distributed through NGOs and UN agencies.

“As Europeans, we stand together for the people of Syria, for a free and peaceful Syria,” she declared. But noticeably absent was a full-throated condemnation of the Jolani regime for these massacres.

Estimates of the dead have ranged from over 1,000 to several thousand to as many as ten or fifteen thousand, according to some independent sources. The London based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) has documented that at least 1,557 Alawite civilians were killed and executed by members of Syria’s Ministries of Interior and Defense and allied groups.

Bodies have been photographed and filmed strewn about streets in locales around Latakia, near the coast, and Syrian authorities are digging mass graves before UN teams can arrive.

A new short documentary film by well-known independent journalist Lindsey Snell has documented Syria’s new killing fields…

Former Congressman Dennis Kucinich has asked, “Why would America champion policies that lead to the killing of Christians, the destruction of churches, the massacre of Alawites and the rise of radical jihadists? Why did our leaders knowingly aid those who murdered the very people America claimed to want to protect?”

“The answer lies in a corrupt, immoral foreign policy dictated not by ethics, human rights, or even national security, but by the interests of the military-industrial complex and strategists who view human lives as pawns in a geopolitical chess game,” he wrote.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 02:45

Does The US Have A Secret ‘Kill Switch’ To Deactivate European Weapons?

Does The US Have A Secret ‘Kill Switch’ To Deactivate European Weapons?

Via Remix News,

It may sound like merely a conspiracy theory, but European governments today are seriously concerned that the weapons in their arsenals – many of which were designed, built, and are often still maintained by defense companies in the United States. The fear is that they may have secret “kill switches” that will deactivate them if attempts are made to use them in a way that Washington opposes.

Such rumors have circulated since the days of the Cold War, but they have taken on new urgency given the Trump administration’s condemnation of Western Europe as well as its peace overtures to Russia and China. This was especially highlighted in Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference last month, where he stated that Europe’s real danger is “the threat from within” rather than Russia or China.

Some European governments were also alarmed when President Donald Trump temporarily withdrew military aid from Kyiv after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky argued with him during a meeting in the Oval Office last month.

“If they see how Trump is dealing with Zelensky, they should be worried,” executive Mikael Grev of the Swedish artificial intelligence company Avioniq Awareness, which specializes in AI applications for military aircraft, told the Financial Times. “He is throwing him under the bus. The Nordic and Baltic states need to think: will he do the same to us?”

The existence of secret “kill switches” has never been proven, but is definitely possible. Richard Aboulafia of Ann Arbor, Michigan-based aviation consulting firm AeroDynamic Advisory said that given that weapons could theoretically be deactivated “with a little bit of software code,” such a possibility “exists.”

The real danger to Europe may not be secret codes, however, but rather the fact that European militaries are heavily dependent on the U.S. for parts and maintenance. Some 55 percent of imported military equipment that was purchased in Europe between 2019 and 2023 came from the U.S., an increase of 35 percent compared to the previous five years. To cite just one example, more than half of the fifth-generation fighter aircraft – those that are state-of-the-art – currently in service across Europe were made in the U.S.

All of these American-made weapons depend on an uninterrupted supply of spare parts, ammunition, and software updates from the U.S. in order to continue functioning. Some more sophisticated equipment is also routinely sent back to the U.S. for maintenance.

Besides this, Europe’s armed forces are totally reliant on US support in terms of communications and electronic warfare, as well as for intelligence, surveillance, software, and reconnaissance.

A split in the Europe-U.S. military alliance, which has been the bedrock of global security for the past 80 years, seemed unthinkable until only a few months ago. Given the new geopolitical realities that Europe is now facing from both a renewed threat in Moscow and uncertainty over Washington’s commitments, European politicians are likely to begin reevaluating this dependency.

Just one example of the new problems confronting Europe as a result of this shift is the threat Trump has made to annex the Danish territory of Greenland – by force, if necessary. Denmark has said that it will prepare the island to defend itself from a possible U.S. attack by strengthening the Danish air force’s presence there.

Given that the Royal Danish Air Force flies American-made F-35 fighters, however, it may be difficult for Denmark to deploy them against U.S. forces in the event of a conflict. Even if there are no “kill switches” in them, if U.S. defense contractors stopped providing maintenance and software updates, the aircraft wouldn’t keep flying for long.

Even those advanced fighter aircraft that were designed and built domestically in Europe depend on secure communications systems and GPS navigation provided by the U.S.

Perhaps the most critical question facing a Europe contemplating a world without American support is that of the United Kingdom’s nuclear weapons. Since the early days of the Cold War, all European countries that are members of NATO have been under the U.S.’ “nuclear umbrella,” meaning that Washington has pledged to defend them from attack by every means, up to and including the use of nuclear weapons.

It has always been believed that this threat of “mutually assured destruction” has deterred Europe’s adversaries, and Russia in particular, from contemplating attacks on Europe. While this has not happened yet, if the U.S. were to withdraw its nuclear protection, Europe would suddenly find itself more vulnerable to foreign attack than it has been at any time since World War II.

The only two European countries with their own nuclear arsenals are the U.K. and France. France has already offered to extend its own “nuclear umbrella” to Germany, although Berlin has yet to make a decision regarding this proposal. France’s arsenal is relatively small, however: It is believed to possess only about 300 nuclear warheads, far fewer than the nearly 6,000 that Russia is estimated to have.

The U.K. could bolster this capability by offering to extend its own “nuclear umbrella” over continental Europe. The problem is that all of the country’s nuclear missiles, which are deployed aboard submarines, were designed and built in the U.S. Apart from the possibility of existing “kill switches,” the missiles are routinely sent back to a facility in King’s Bay, Georgia, for maintenance – and thus could not continue operating indefinitely without U.S. support.

Although European politicians are beginning to contemplate the possibility of a world where they can no longer count on America as a result of the statements coming from American politicians, nothing has changed in their relationship as of yet. This was confirmed by Joachim Finkielman, who is the director of DI Danish Defence and Security Industries, an association that represents the interests of those Danish companies that work in the defense sector.

“There is a lot of uneasiness about what’s going to happen,” he said to the Financial Times, “but up until now we haven’t felt any changes in the relationship with the US.”

Finkielman also pointed out that while European militaries are heavily reliant on U.S. support, it is also the case that U.S. defense companies in some cases rely on parts made in Denmark, including for the F-35 fighter. Thus, this dependency isn’t entirely one-sided.

It remains to be seen if this apparent political parting of ways between the U.S. and Europe will end up being seen as only a bump in the road or a lasting break. The real loser may end up being the American defense industry, given that it has been Europe’s trust in unwavering U.S. support that brought about its willing reliance on American-made weaponry in the first place.

It may already be too late to stop this from happening, however, given that sales of American weapons have dropped while those of European-made armaments have soared since Trump took office in January.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/18/2025 – 02:00

Predicting The Shape Of Future Military Conflicts

Predicting The Shape Of Future Military Conflicts

Authored by Christian Milord via The Epoch Times,

It’s difficult to forecast how military conflicts will unfold once they are initiated, but military realists can identify likely scenarios based upon precedent as well as current ongoing conflicts. What might future conflicts look like and what types of platforms would be utilized in these kinetic and non-kinetic environments?

In a highly informative and thought-provoking book, “Unit X—How the Pentagon and Silicon Valley are Transforming the Future of War, 2024,” authors Christopher Kirchhoff and Raj Shah attempt to map out what might occur in both defensive and offensive scenarios. Unit X refers to the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), which was the brainchild of Raj Shah, a former F-16 pilot with the Air National Guard.

Shah came up with the idea of an experimental innovation unit after experiencing as a pilot the almost obsolete mapping and navigation capabilities of his fighter aircraft. He had a difficult time knowing for sure whether or not he had crossed a particular prohibited Middle East national border.

Moreover, there were outmoded methods of aircraft scheduling during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom. The Middle East aviation command center that scheduled air operations was still using markers and whiteboards instead of computers for data analysis and the scheduling of hundreds of inbound and outbound aerial missions.

After Shah left the Guard, he had a desire to find solutions to these problems by seeking answers from the Pentagon and venture capital innovators who were forward thinkers. This is where Christopher Kirchhoff entered the picture as a specialist in disruptive and emerging technologies.

Kirchhoff had advised a number of tech companies and the government on national security matters. In the beginning of the DIU venture in 2016, it was tough sledding to create an innovation unit at the Pentagon for two reasons.

First, the Pentagon already had the entrenched Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which was formed in 1958 as a response to the Soviet Union’s Sputnik moment. DARPA had developed the ARPANET, a predecessor of the internet, as well as aerial drones, GPS, night vision goggles, and more. However, DARPA’s failure rate from design to prototype, to testing to production was more than 80 percent.

Next, according to the authors, tense relations existed between the Dept. of Defense (DOD) and California’s Silicon Valley incubator startups. Private sector innovators were impatient with the bureaucratic obstacles encountered when interacting with the Pentagon, while the Pentagon was dissatisfied with some of the innovative technologies coming out of Silicon Valley.

In the first year of the DIU, there were intense discussions, and funding was difficult to garner. However, with some assistance from former Defense Secretaries Ash Carter, Mark Esper and James Mattis, some of the bureaucratic hurdles were overcome and the DIU got off the ground. Relations with Silicon Valley gradually improved in the second and third year. Retired Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, who is a Middle East combat veteran currently at the Hoover Institution, also played a role as an adviser to the DIU.

By the second and third year, the DIU was operational and gaining speed. It would solicit future military concepts from tech firms, ideas were exchanged, and innovative experts would strive to transform realistic concepts into next-generation platforms. Funding and the staff grew in size, and the DIU was no longer merely an experimental unit. DIU staff labored to reduce the time frame from concept to testing to 12–24 months through a nimbler acquisition process that bypassed excessive red tape.

Although the authors are aware that conventional warfighting will continue to be utilized in future warfare, a mixture of conventional and unconventional hybrid warfare is already occurring in the battlespaces of the Middle East and Ukraine. Cyberattacks, drones, artificial intelligence such as machine learning and quantum computing are being applied in surveillance, reconnaissance and targeting operations.

Moreover, robotics, as well as unmanned aerial, subsurface, and surface vehicles are working their way into the arsenals of both adversaries and allies. Elon Musk’s Starlink communication system is an example of dual-use commercial and military technology.

The DIU is the sole DOD organization that streamlines the pace of design, prototype, and testing of emerging dual use technologies, then scales successful upgrades that can be applied to modern platforms, as well as in current aircraft and naval vessels. It now has branch offices around the country and at the DOD. Some of the companies that contract with the Pentagon include Coherent Logix, Kodiak, Nova Spark, Shield AI, Skydio, Zepher Flight, among others.

This DOD and tech company ecosystem is an urgent national security necessity in light of the threats posed by America’s near-peer and peer competitors, as well as non-state actors. Indeed, China (PRC) is intensifying its unrestricted (cyber, economic, informational, political, military) warfare activities around the globe. The West must get ahead of the curve in research and development to maintain readiness at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels.

Kirchhoff and Shah conclude by stating, “The ultimate goal is not to win wars but to deter them. Innovation is our asymmetric means to achieve and maintain peace. The question now is whether the Pentagon will develop at scale the battlefield innovations it has incubated. Advocates of innovation must keep pressing despite the seemingly Sisyphean task of reform. Leadership must back them to the hilt.” Sage advice indeed.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/17/2025 – 23:25

California Bill To Restrict Self Defense Withdrawn By Sponsor

California Bill To Restrict Self Defense Withdrawn By Sponsor

A proposed law in California intended to limit the conditions under which lethal force could be used in self-defense has been withdrawn by its sponsor. Assemblymember Rich Chavez Zbur (D-Hollywood) announced on Wednesday that Assembly Bill 1333 was pulled due what he claims was “misleading information” causing widespread confusion and fear among the public.

AB 1333 aimed to clarify scenarios where the use of lethal force in self-defense would be considered unjustified, particularly emphasizing situations where excessive force was employed beyond what was reasonably necessary.

The bill quickly became controversial, attracting fierce opposition from conservative critics who portrayed it as another lenient, crime-friendly initiative by California Democrats. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, who is also running for governor, publicly opposed the bill, asserting that it would effectively criminalize self-defense actions against offenders.

“Sacramento Democrats have spent the last 15 years tying the hands of law enforcement and coddling criminals, using and abusing ordinary Californians in their attempt to make criminals the real victims,” Bianco declared. “Now, they’re actively trying to tie the hands of our residents, who have had to defend themselves against re-released career criminals far too often.”

As the NRA wrote in response to the withdrawal:

AB 1333, if passed, would have restricted the self-defense rights of crime victims by eliminating California’s “no duty to retreat” protection for individuals that are forced to defend themselves. This would make it easier to prosecute victims of crime who use self-defense if they did not first attempt to retreat before protecting themselves. AB 1333 would force victims to accede to the demands of violent criminals or potentially face legal charges themselves. This only revictimizes the victim of a crime while doing nothing to deter criminals.

Republican Assembly Leader James Gallagher credited public and institutional pressure for the bill’s withdrawal, citing vocal opposition from the public and district attorneys.

Assemblyman Tom Lackey, representing Southern California’s high desert communities, called the bill a “complete assault on self-defense.”

“Imagine this: A violent criminal breaks into your home, and you have to second-guess whether defending your family is ‘justifiable,’” Lackey wrote on social media.

“The misguided energy behind this proposal is beyond comprehension.”

Zbur, however, maintains his commitment to public safety and the principles behind AB 1333.

“Protecting public safety has always been my top priority,” Zbur said in his statement. “AB 1333 sought to close a dangerous legal loophole that could allow armed aggressors to initiate confrontations in public, kill their victims, and then exploit self-defense laws to escape accountability.”

Which is of course, bullshit.

For those who need to brush up on home defense, Massad Ayoob is the man…

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/17/2025 – 23:00

Gaza Authorities Say Death Toll Already Surpasses 200 After Ceasefire Collapsed 

Gaza Authorities Say Death Toll Already Surpasses 200 After Ceasefire Collapsed 

Update(2200): Just a couple hours into Israel’s renewed bombing campaign in Gaza, and with the ceasefire definitely over (and likely not coming back), and Gaza health authorities have said the death toll has already surpassed 200 people killed.

“The Gaza Government Media Office reports that more than 200 people have been killed in the Israeli bombing of multiple areas across the Strip in the early hours of the morning,” and some more of the latest via Al Jazeera:

  • Children are among the many killed and many wounded in Israeli air attacks across the Gaza Strip, the largest strikes since the ceasefire with Hamas started on January 19.
  • United States Lieutenant General Alexus Grynkewich says US strikes on Yemen have killed dozens of Houthi fighters. The UN children’s agency, UNICEF, says at least two children, aged six and eight, are among the dead.
  • Thousands of people have rallied in Yemen’s Sanaa in support of the Houthis who have vowed to respond to the US attacks as US President Donald Trump says Iran will “suffer the consequences” if they do.
  • The Houthis say their attacks on US and Israel-linked ships in the Red Sea are in solidarity with the people of Gaza, where Israel’s blockade has now reached a sixteenth day.
  • Meanwhile, Israeli attacks have killed three people in Syria and two people in southern Lebanon.

* * *

After two months of performative efforts at peace, the latest Israel-Gaza ceasefire ended with a literal bang moments ago when Israel launched “extensive strikes” strikes against on terror targets belonging to Hamas and promised ‘increasing military force’ after talks on on further hostage releases stalled.

Early Friday morning, Israel’s Prime Minister’s office said it instructed the army to strike Hamas across Gaza, with dozens reportedly killed and injured.

The statement said it was because of Hamas’ repeated refusals to release its hostages and its rejection of all offers it received from the U.S. presidential envoy Steve Witkoff and mediators.

The news was so unexpected it took even Polymarket by surprise where odds of a ceasefire lasting into April were in the low 30s just earlier this evening before hitting 100%.

Israel’s military said Home Command has ordered restrictions on civilian activity near the Gaza Strip following the Hamas strikes.

According to the Israeli PM’s office, the PM and Defense Minister directed the military to take strong actions against Hamas and Gaza following the group’s persistent refusal to release hostages and rejections of proposals it had received.

Meanwhile, the Palestinian Civil Emergency Service said that Israel had conducted at least 35 airtriles on Gaza.

The strikes come after nearly two months of a ceasefire to pause the 17-month long war where dozens of hostages were released for nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners.

Developing

Tyler Durden
Mon, 03/17/2025 – 22:59