40.4 F
Chicago
Sunday, November 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 1810

Sour Grapes? US Winemakers Call On Trump To Tax Aussie Wine

Sour Grapes? US Winemakers Call On Trump To Tax Aussie Wine

Authored by Rex Widerstrom via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

American winemakers have joined tech companies, beef producers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers in demanding U.S. President Donald Trump impose large tariffs on Australian imports.

A view of champagne being served during a Virtual Tour of Australia in NYC at Hudson Mercantile on January 23, 2017, in New York City. Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images

The California Association of Winegrape Growers (CAWG) has taken issue with Australia’s 29 percent tax on imported wine, which it says is one of several “unfair, non-reciprocal trade practices” that disadvantage U.S. wine producers.

The formal complaint has been lodged with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, but the eventual decision will rest with the president, given Trump’s stated determination to impose tariffs as a tool to even out trade relations.

—many of whom have been growing grapes for generations—to go “out of business at an alarming rate.”The CAWG alleges that an “influx of cheap, imported bulk wine” into America is causing vineyards and farmers

The organisation admits the issue is “nuanced,” noting that not only do other countries’ tariffs disadvantage American growers, but many foreign competitors also benefit from lower production costs and “in many cases, generous public subsidies.”

It said the Australian government gives benefits to the local wine industry—including rebates, $100,000 grants, loans, and financial assistance—which “distort competition” for U.S. winemakers.

But while pleading its case to Trump, the CAWG isn’t optimistic that he’ll solve the issues they face.

“Despite the attention surrounding this latest tariff threat, it is unlikely that tariffs of this magnitude will be implemented in a sustainable or long-term manner. However, this moment presents a valuable opportunity to address the need for a level playing field for California winegrape growers,” said CAWG President Natalie Collins.

A picker empties freshly picked sémillon grapes into a crate during the harvest at Glandore Wines in the Hunter Valley in New South Wales, Australia on Jan. 11, 2024. The valley is the oldest wine-growing region in Australia, with Shiraz vines dating back to 1867. Roni Bintang/Getty Images

While bottled wines are an issue, it is bulk wine imports (finished wine shipped in large flexi-tanks, bladders, or containers) that “pose a more urgent and direct threat to California winegrowers,” the organisation said.

“Foreign bulk wine floods the U.S. at below-market prices, allowing companies to bottle and sell it under familiar ‘American’ brands, misleading consumers and undercutting domestic farmers. In 2024, an estimated 300,000 tons (272,000 tonnes) of California wine grapes went unharvested, while 38 million gallons (44 million litres) of cheap foreign bulk wine replaced California-grown grapes.

“Amid all the noise over tariffs, an actual, and very real, crisis is unfolding in California Wine Country. Winegrowers and wineries are being forced to make impossible decisions; ripping out vineyards, ending family businesses, and shutting down operations,” it says.

It also warns that any tariffs the president does decide to impose may be negated by other programmes.

President Donald Trump departs the U.S. Capitol following a Friends of Ireland luncheon in Washington on March 12, 2025. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

“The federal duty drawback system, in its current form, further incentivises bulk imports by allowing companies to claim refunds on import duties and excise taxes; giving imported wine a competitive advantage in the U.S. market,” CAWG says.

“This flawed program may render tariffs ineffective if companies can simply recover those costs through duty drawback.”

Australia Incentivises Wine Growing for Tourism

Australia does provide support to its wine industry.

The Wine Tourism and Cellar Door Grants Programme allows wine and cider producers to apply for grants of up to $100,000 on eligible cellar door sales.

The government has so far provided $60 million through this programme, though—while it does support grape growers—it targets cellar door sales in Australia as part of tourism promotion and does not directly affect exports.

There’s also support for research and development through the Research and Innovation (R&I) Funding programme, though this is partly funded through a levy on growers, which the government then matches.

Last year, the government also announced a one-off $3.5 million grant package to support the industry’s long-term viability after it found itself dealing with an oversupply of red wine.

Despite the popularity of bold red varieties such as Shiraz in Australia, the industry found itself with a glut of red wine last year, and received a government subsidy to help it cope. Roni Bintang/Getty Images

And Australian winemakers, along with other primary producers, can also benefit from initiatives such as $2 million in support last year for agricultural exporters to re-establish commercial connections in China and continue to diversify into other markets.

But unlike Australia, where consumption of alcohol has been steadily falling since around 1990, in America it has grown over the same period.

US Incentives for Local Growers

However, members of the CAWG also benefit from generous government assistance.

The CBMTRA (California Beverage Manufacturers Tax Relief Act) provides tax credits for wineries of all sizes, calculated based on the number of gallons produced.

The formula is: $1.00 per gallon for the first 30,000 gallons; $0.90 per gallon for gallons 30,001 to 130,000; and $0.53 per gallon for gallons 130,001 to 650,000. That applies whether or not the wine is exported.

U.S. wineries and their peak bodies can also apply for grant money, which can be used for market research and to help them determine if a particular market would benefit their business.

The U.S. wine industry is currently in crisis (pdf); numerous reports have outlined declining domestic sales due in part to a lack of interest among younger generations.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 16:20

Burrito Now, Pay Later: DoorDash – Klarna Deal Feeds US Debt Addiction

Burrito Now, Pay Later: DoorDash – Klarna Deal Feeds US Debt Addiction

We’ve reported on many indications of a faltering US economy being propped up by debt, but our latest entry is particularly emphatic: DoorDash has inked a deal with Klarna that will let cash-strapped consumers pay for restaurant food, groceries and other delivery orders in four equal, interest-free installments, or “at a more convenient time, such as a date that aligns with their paycheck schedules.” 

Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) arrangements have surged in recent years. However, what began as a reasonable accommodation for large purchases like appliances and furniture has now metastasized to a point where Americans can finance Friday-night-pizza impulse-buys.   

Merchants like Buy Now Pay Later plans, as they encourage consumers to impulsively spend more than they otherwise would

Klarna derives more than 60% of its revenue from fees paid by merchants who offer the financing option to their customers, with those fees potentially ranging from 1.5% to 7% of the purchase price. With some merchants, Klarna and other BNPL-facilitators also earn interest on long-term credit plans stretching out to upwards of 36 months. 

However, Klarna also has a chance to earn money from consumers who take the interest-free, four-equal-installments plan — in the form of late fees of up to $7 per missed payment, up to 25% of the purchase price. For the financially disorganized or imminently insolvent, the interest-free option could prove to be a siren song that leaves their cash flow dashed against the metaphoric rocks of unexpectedly expensive burritos and Kung Pao chicken.  

Even for those who make timely payments, the interest-free option can have a destructive effect over time, by encouraging consumers to commit to spending more money than they would in the absence of the appealing, “interest-free” enticement. Indeed, that’s one of the essential attractions for DoorDash and other merchants who choose to partner with the likes of Klarna:  

According to research from RBC Capital Markets…online BNPL offerings boosted average ticket sales by 30% to 50% and increase the share of customers who ultimately made a purchase. — CNN

“The problem is these things start having a very pervasive and very negative influence on people who can’t afford it,” Anish Nagpal, an University of Melbourne marketing professor who studies behavioral decision-making, told the Washington Post. “They just want something now, and they go into this spiral of debt and always trying to chase up and meet the payment requirement.”

Naturally, Klarna Chief Commercial Officer David Sykes tried putting a different spin on things: 

“Our partnership with DoorDash marks an important milestone in Klarna’s expansion into everyday spending categories. By offering smarter, more flexible payment solutions for groceries, takeout, and retail essentials, we’re making convenience even more accessible for millions of Americans.”

We must ask: Is it ever “smarter” to finance a sandwich? 

News of the DealDash BNPL arrangement comes against a backdrop of steadily rising consumer debt and signs that Americans are increasingly unable to keep up with their obligations. The New York Fed’s latest quarterly report found that total household debt increased by $93 billion in 2024’s fourth quarter, pushing the total over $18 trillion. Warning lights are flashing:

After the Doordash-Klarna news broke, social media memesters had an absolute field day:  

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 15:45

Anti-MAGA Law Firm Pledges $40M To Pro-Trump Causes To Avoid Security Clearance Suspensions

Anti-MAGA Law Firm Pledges $40M To Pro-Trump Causes To Avoid Security Clearance Suspensions

Authored by Katabella Roberts via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

President Donald Trump is withdrawing an executive order targeting New York-based law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (Paul Weiss) after it agreed to review its hiring practices and provide tens of millions of dollars in free legal services to support some of his administration’s initiatives.

President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the East Room of the White house on March 20, 2025. Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

The March. 14 order suspended security clearances for Paul Weiss lawyers and restricted their access to government buildings and officials, citing the firm’s diversity policies. It also directed federal agencies to take steps to cancel U.S. government contracts “for which Paul Weiss has been hired to perform any service.”

Trump confirmed the withdrawal of the order in a March 20 statement on the social media platform Truth Social.

The decision followed Trump’s meeting with the law firm’s chairman, Brad Karp, “during which Mr. Karp acknowledged the wrongdoing of former Paul, Weiss partner, Mark Pomerantz, the grave dangers of Weaponization, and the vital need to restore our System of Justice,” according to the statement.

No further details were provided regarding the alleged wrongdoing.

*  *  *

You can support ZeroHedge by picking up a waxed canvas hat!

Click hat… add to cart… check out… receive awesome hat…

According to the statement, the law firm has agreed to dedicate the equivalent of $40 million in pro bono legal services over the course of Trump’s term “to support the Administration’s initiatives,” including assisting veterans and the president’s Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, among other projects.

It also affirmed its commitment to merit-based hiring, promotion, and retention, and will not adopt, use, or pursue any diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, the statement said.

“As part of its commitment, it will engage experts, to be mutually agreed upon within 14 days, to conduct a comprehensive audit of all of its employment practices,” the statement said.

Paul Weiss also agreed that “the bedrock principle of American Justice is that it must be fair and nonpartisan for all,” the statement read.

It added that Paul Weiss affirms its “unwavering commitment to these core ideals and principles,” and “will not deny representation to clients, including in pro bono matters and in support of non-profits, because of the personal political views of individual lawyers.”

In response to Trump’s decision to withdraw the executive order, Karp said the firm was “gratified” and is looking forward to “an engaged and constructive relationship with the President and his Administration.”

Trump’s March 14 order also targeted Paul Weiss’s hiring of attorney Mark Pomerantz in 2022, a former partner of the law firm who left to work in the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

During his time at the district attorney’s office, Pomerantz was involved in an investigation into Trump’s alleged payments to Stephanie Clifford, better known as adult performer Stormy Daniels.

Pomerantz said in a statement that he “engaged in no wrongdoing by working as a prosecutor to uphold the rule of law.”

Trump’s order also mentioned a Paul Weiss partner and former leading prosecutor in the office of special counsel Robert Mueller who brought a pro bono lawsuit against individuals alleged to have participated in the Jan. 6, 2021 breach, of the U.S. Capitol, on behalf of the District of Columbia attorney general.

“My Administration has already taken action to address some of the significant risks and egregious conduct associated with law firms, and I have determined that similar action is necessary to end Government sponsorship of harmful activity by an additional law firm: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (Paul Weiss),” Trump wrote.

In recent weeks, Trump also signed a presidential memorandum targeting law firm Covington & Burling and an executive order targeting Perkins Coie. In response, Perkins Coie sued the administration in federal court in Washington last week.

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the administration from enforcing portions of the order on Perkins Coie, finding the law firm was likely to win its lawsuit alleging Trump’s actions violated the firm’s rights under the U.S. Constitution.

The Epoch Times reached out to Paul Weiss, Covington & Burling, and Perkins Coie for comment but did not receive a response by publication time.

Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 15:10

Hundreds Of Anti-Erdogan Protesters Arrested Overnight As Crisis Slides: ‘Fight About Democracy’

Hundreds Of Anti-Erdogan Protesters Arrested Overnight As Crisis Slides: ‘Fight About Democracy’

Via The Cradle

Turkish police have detained 343 people during overnight protests in several cities against the detention of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, the Interior Ministry said Saturday.

Demonstrations took place across the country, including in Istanbul and the capital Ankara, the ministry said in a statement. It said the detentions were made to prevent “disrupting of public order” and warned that authorities would not tolerate “chaos and provocation.”

Via Associated Press

The Republican People’s Party (CHP), of which Imamoglu is a member, said the detentions were politically motivated and urged supporters to demonstrate lawfully. The protests are the biggest in Turkey since the massive demonstrations of 2013 to protest the demolition of Istanbul’s Gezi Park, Kurdistan 24 reported.

“There is a great anger. People are spontaneously taking to the streets. Some young people are being politicized for the first time in their lives,” said Yuksel Taskin, a lawmaker from the CHP.

“The feeling of being trapped — economically, socially, politically, and even culturally — was already widespread,” journalist and author Kemal Can told AFP.

The protests began on March 19 after Mayor Imamoglu was detained at his home that morning on terrorism and corruption charges. “I see today during my interrogation that I and my colleagues are faced with unimaginable accusations and slanders,” Imamoglu said in his defense during a counter-terrorism police interrogation, a court document viewed by Reuters showed.

Imamoglu is considered a prominent rival to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He was set to run for his party’s presidential primary on 23 March – during which he was expected to be chosen as the CHP candidate for future presidential elections scheduled for 2028.

According to the Istanbul Chief Prosecutor’s Office, Imamoglu and others have been accused of “running a criminal organization, membership of a criminal organization, corruption, bribery, fraud, illegally obtaining personal data, and corruption in a public tender.”

He has also been accused of “aiding” the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) – outlawed in Turkiye – by participating in an “urban consensus initiative” aimed at bolstering the Kurdish group’s influence in last year’s local elections.

Imamoglu’s arrest came a day after Istanbul University nullified his diploma, making him ineligible to run in elections under Turkish law.

Anti-riot measures being deployed by police. The Guardian has said it is becoming a “fight about democracy”…

Since the detention, Ankara has identified hundreds of X accounts and detained 37 social media users for “provocative posts inciting crime and hatred,” Turkiye’s Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said on Thursday. 

“Efforts to catch the other suspects are ongoing,” the minister added. Restrictions have been imposed on several social media platforms. 

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 14:00

Woke Kennedy Center Worker Fired Over Naked Meltdown Video About Trump & Musk 

Woke Kennedy Center Worker Fired Over Naked Meltdown Video About Trump & Musk 

Tavish Forsyth, a woke leftist and former program director at the Kennedy Center’s Opera Institute, was fired after bizarrely stripping down in a 35-minute video posted on YouTube and X, during which he ranted against President Trump’s takeover of the national cultural center on the eastern bank of the Potomac River in Washington, D.C.

“Trump has taken over the Kennedy Center and that’s a place where I work,” Forsyth said in the video while clothed.

With a snap of his fingers, the troubled man went from clothed to naked in an utterly weird video. 

“Does staying make me a collaborator or somehow complicit in a hostile government takeover that’s systematically targeting the livelihood and liberty of poor people, queer people, Black/brown people, people of color, immigrants, Muslims, victims in war-torn countries, ethnic cleansing, women?” Forsyth said, adding, “And gosh, when I put it that way it seems obvious. Fuck Donald Trump and the Kennedy Center.”

The crazed leftist also called Elon Musk a “Nazi.”

Forsyth posted the video on Wednesday, and one day later—according to the New York Post, citing Roma Daravi, vice president of public relations at the Kennedy Center—the pronoun-wielding activist was fired. 

“The video was extremely disturbing and does not represent the values of the Kennedy Center. Most concerning of all, his contracted position was specifically to work with minors,” Daravi told NYPost. 

Daravi said, “Who knows what kind of radical ideology they have been pushing on the youth. Not anymore. They’re fired.”

Public records and forensic data reveal that Forsyth is the founder of Bird City Improv, LLC, which is described on the company’s website as a “liberation-focused school, improv theatre, and consultancy that centers the experiences and wisdom of queer, BIPOC, and femme artists.” 

Bird City Improv offers “accessible workshops, community-focused classes, and personal coaching” on all things woke and has worked with these entities:

  • Maryland Economic Development Association

  • Agora Financial 

  • T. Rowe Price

  • Johns Hopkins

And others… 

Maryland State Arts Council’s website has an entire section dedicated to the DEI warrior, promoting his services and explaining his audience types: “High School (9-12 grade), Creative Aging (Older Adults), LGBTQ+ community, Educators, Other Population/Community.” 

For DOGE, we suggest looking into the taxpayer-funded grants that have funded/ or are funding Forsyth’s DEI activism… 

As for Forsyth—well, melting down naked on camera is bizarre. There’s a great mental hospital north of Baltimore called Sheppard Pratt. 

*  *  *

Eh, so anyway… You can support ZeroHedge by picking up a waxed canvas hat!

Click hat… add to cart… check out… receive awesome hat…

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 13:25

Germany Seizes Oil Tanker Belonging To Russia’s Shadow Fleet

Germany Seizes Oil Tanker Belonging To Russia’s Shadow Fleet

By Tsvetana Paraskova of OilPrice.com

Germany has seized an oil tanker of the Russian shadow fleet that was found adrift in the Baltic Sea in January, German magazine Spiegel reported on Friday, quoting security sources.

The tanker, Eventin, was traveling under the flag of Panama when German authorities said in January that the vessel, belonging to the Russian shadow fleet, was stuck in German waters in the Baltic Sea.

The tanker had lost power and steering and was found adrift in the sea, north of the German island of Rügen.

Germany secured the vessel and blamed Russia for the use of a shadow fleet of tankers.

“Russia is endangering our European security not only with its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine, but also with severed cables, displaced border buoys, disinformation campaigns, GPS jammers and, as we have seen, dilapidated oil tankers,” German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said at the time.

Two months after the incident was reported, Germany has now seized the tanker along with its cargo of about 100,000 tons of crude oil, Spiegel reports. The ship and the cargo, which is worth about $43 million (40 million euros), are now the property of Germany.

The tanker’s original route was to ship the oil from the Russian port of Ust-Luga through the Baltic Sea to Port Said in Egypt.

When found adrift in German waters, the tanker was towed to the waters off Sassnitz, due to an imminent danger of oil spill from the decrepit vessel. German coast guard and federal police have been monitoring the tanker since then, Spiegel reports.

Eventin was included in the latest EU sanctions against Russia at the end of February. The EU’s 16th sanctions package against Russia targeted 74 additional vessels, bringing the total number of sanctioned vessels to 153.

“These vessels are part of the shadow fleet or contributed to Russia’s energy revenues,” the EU said.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 11:40

Iceland’s Minister For Children Quits After Admitting Having Baby With 16 Year Old

Iceland’s Minister For Children Quits After Admitting Having Baby With 16 Year Old

Iceland’s minister for children has resigned after admitting she had a child over 30 years ago with a 16-year-old boy while she was a 22-year-old church group counselor, according to the New York Post.

Ásthildur Lóa Thórsdóttir, whose name has forced us to remember Word keystrokes we haven’t used in years, is now 58 and a member of the center-left People’s Party.

She confirmed the relationship after local outlet RUV received a tip. She revealed the teen father was present during the birth, and later paid child support.

The NY Post article says that the teen father, Eirík Ásmundsson, paid child support for 18 years, though Thórsdóttir allegedly limited his access to the child after marrying, according to reports.

“I understand… what it looks like,” Thórsdóttir said, claiming it’s “very difficult to get the right story across in the news today.”

While Iceland’s age of consent is 15, sex with a minor under 18 is illegal if one is their teacher or mentor.

It’s unclear if authorities are investigating. Thórsdóttir resigned as minister after being summoned by Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir, who called it a “very personal matter.” Thórsdóttir says she’ll stay in parliament because…well, of course she will.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 11:05

The Darkest Secret Behind Democrats’ Economic Policy

The Darkest Secret Behind Democrats’ Economic Policy

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

I’m a realist. I understand there’s always going to be hypocrisy on both sides of the political aisle. And I also understand that, as far as politics go, monetary policy is pretty much “the third rail.”

As I’ve always said, if there’s one thing that should alarm you about today’s monetary policy — which is damn close to full-on modern monetary theory — it’s the fact that both political parties agree on it. Are there any other issues that you can think of off the top of your head that both parties agree on and never argue about? I sure as hell can’t.

But while both parties have generally embraced the way the country has run monetary policy, their respective stances on how the country runs fiscal policy are quite different. And therein lies the basis for why today’s revelation matters.

There’s no doubt the United States needs to make dramatic spending cuts to prevent itself from spiraling—either downward into an eventual debt default or upward into hyperinflation. If you want a primer on why that is, I’d recommend listening to this one-hour, simple-to-understand synopsis of the country’s financial position, followed by this appearance by Jim Bianco on the Julia LaRoche podcast a couple of days ago.

Right now, the political climate consists of Republicans taking a chainsaw to anything they can get their hands on in government to cut spending, and Democrats protesting any and all cuts for any reason they can drum up. Hashing out individual issues worthy of cuts is not what this article is about, so we’ll save that discussion for another day.

This article is meant to point out the fatal hypocritical flaw that exists in Democrats’ reasoning as it relates to the country’s financials. Everybody understands the simple idea that if we run up too much debt, the country could, in essence, go bankrupt. But what’s really alarming now is the pace at which we are running up this debt. It’s why this chart of the national debt is going parabolically higher. The number $35 trillion is astonishing — but the rate with which we are moving higher is beyond breakneck.

The Kobeissi Letter on X:

Source: Kobeissi Letter

The cuts that are being attempted are a direct effort to address the size of the deficit, which is a fancy word for how much more money the U.S. goes into debt every year. The idea is to slow the pace of debt accumulation and then eventually reverse course to start paying it down.

Make no mistake about it—the Biden administration did not give a single solitary f*ck thought to how fast we were running up debt. The deficit under the Biden presidency propelled the debt to unprecedented levels that put us on an extremely dangerous trajectory. There appeared to be zero discretion or care in how the Biden administration spent. This is pretty much par for the course for Democrats, who generally believe there should be no ceiling on how high taxes can go and how big government can get, and nothing is off-limits to tax, regardless of how regressive.

The topic of government ever getting too big or taxes getting too high is never broached. As policy, Democrats fight for their right to push the economy to the brink.


🔥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: ZH reader exclusive | This coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life: Get 50% off forever


Economists on the left have supplemented this asinine policy with the complex-sounding bullshit jargon of modern monetary theory, which, without getting into the intricacies of it, posits that the Fed can print as much money as it needs without any consequence, and we have through the miracle of academia, in essence, unlocked some Game Genie-like cheat code for the nation’s economy.

Again, both parties embrace monetary policy as it exists today (i.e. Trump calling for rate cuts this week) but only one party believes that spending can be unlimited and that there are no consequences to poor economic decisions.

The modern-day left presents themselves as the party that fights for not just equality, but equity. They’re no longer happy with just equality of opportunity; they want to push for equality of outcome. In other words, Democrats claim they want a system that moves closer toward a socialist state planned economy. While I don’t agree with the idea, I understand that many people who vote Democrat do and think the world would be a better place if the rich had a little less, paid a little more in taxes, and the lower class had a little bit more. These voters believe that more top-line revenue should go toward increased federal spending and social services to benefit those at the bottom of the economic totem pole. Sounds altruistic enough, right?

But the darkest secret of the party that pushes for far-left monetary policy and far-left fiscal policy is this: the more the Federal Reserve continues operating as it has — monetizing debt, bailing out the U.S. economy, and generally perpetually implementing easing conditions — the faster our nation moves away from the socialist utopia that Democrats often say they envision. And you don’t need any more proof of that than a look at how the inequality gap has widened over the last three decades.

This one chart tells the whole story, and lays bare the Democrats’ attitude toward monetary and fiscal policy bare for the hypocritical farce it is. So much for equity:

Once again, on monetary policy, both parties are guilty.

But on fiscal policy, the Democrats are causing significantly more harm than Republicans with the way they view the nation’s finances. Most modern-day Democrats believe that since the U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency, we can print as much as we want and there will be no consequences. They don’t believe in any type of basic economic laws anymore, instead choosing to have faith that these laws have been hypnotized, stunned and then usurped by the magic spell of modern monetary theory, which has solidified the ideas that up is down, down is up, the sky is green, the grass is blue, and Paul Krugman has superpowers that supersede thousands of years of mathematics and economic laws as the human race once knew them.

Looking at the above chart, I think both parties would agree that we have an inequality problem, and the current trajectory we are on with monetary policy is making it worse.

But only one party is at least trying to do something fiscally to keep this monetary fueled gap somewhat steady at where it is today. Democrats, on the other hand, believe they have perfected both monetary and fiscal theory, and that, for the years they have been in charge, everything has gone exactly as planned.

Except it hasn’t. What the above chart shows is that the top 10% of the nation gets significantly, extraordinarily, disproportionately wealthier every time the Federal Reserve steps in to implement quantitative easing.

And what you’ll notice in the chart is that the gap between the lowest 50% of the nation and the top 10% continues to widen. In other words, this is a problem that is getting worse, accelerating and shows no signs of stopping today. On this trajectory, at some point, quality of life for the bottom 50% of the nation is going to get so poor that someone will make this same point on a platform that garners significant attention, and it’s going to click with more everyday people. Maybe at that point, both parties will come together and have a legitimate discussion about monetary policy.

But one thing is for sure: If a lot of center-left Democrats I know understood this point clearly, they might seriously reconsider what it is that their party claims to be fighting for in the first place. And if the concept takes hold and has time to sink in with the nation, it could wind up being yet another issue that Democrats lose a significant tranche of voters over—at a time when their party can least afford it.

Both parties are to blame for flawed monetary policy, but at least Republicans are now floating some sound money ideas and cuts that work toward balacing the budget. As for Democrats, they may say their interests are in increasing equity and equality for their voters, but the policies they put forth instead scream that they want the billionaires and the mega-rich to get significantly wealthier, while the bottom 50% of the nation’s quality of life continues to be brutalized.

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. Assume any and all numbers in this piece are wrong and make sure you check them yourself. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 10:30

How Much Gold Is (Supposedly) In Fort Knox?

How Much Gold Is (Supposedly) In Fort Knox?

U.S. President Donald Trump has promised to visit Fort Knox “to make sure the gold is there.”

Officially, the United States Bullion Depository (commonly known as Fort Knox) holds over half of the Treasury’s $428 billion of gold reserves.

In this graphic, Visual Capitalist’s Bruno Venditti puts that amount into perspective by comparing Fort Knox’s reserves with central bank gold reserves worldwide.

The data comes from the U.S. Mint and the World Gold Council. For illustrative purposes, we considered a pallet of 1,190 gold bars (400 troy ounces each) weighing approximately 14.8 tonnes.

What Is Fort Knox?

Located in Kentucky, Fort Knox is a U.S. Army installation that serves as the primary storage site for America’s gold reserves. The facility was established in the 1930s to protect gold from potential foreign attacks.

The first gold shipment arrived in 1937 via U.S. Mail from the Philadelphia Mint and the New York Assay Office. During World War II, Fort Knox safeguarded important U.S. documents, including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. It has also housed international treasures, such as the Magna Carta and the crown, sword, scepter, orb, and cape of St. Stephen, King of Hungary, before they were returned in 1978.

Currently, it holds 4,175 tonnes of gold, equivalent to nearly half of China’s gold reserves and four times the Swiss central bank’s reserves.

Only small samples have been removed for purity testing during audits; no major transfers have occurred for years.

Gold Bar Specifications

  • Size: 7 inches × 3 5/8 inches × 1 3/4 inches
  • Weight: 400 ounces (27.5 pounds)

Extreme Security

Only a select few know the full security procedures, and no single person knows how to fully open the vault.

In 1974, a group of journalists and a Congressional delegation were allowed inside—marking the first official visit since Fort Knox’s creation. Previously, President Franklin D. Roosevelt was the only person other than authorized personnel to access the vaults.

In 2017, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, and several Congressional representatives became the second group to visit the vault.

If gold was shared equally, how much would you get? Check out this graphic to find out.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 09:55

Outrage After German Intel Chief Says Ukraine War Should Keep Going For Another 5 Years

Outrage After German Intel Chief Says Ukraine War Should Keep Going For Another 5 Years

Via Remix News,

The Ukraine war has already cost hundreds of thousands of lives, but Germany’s top intelligence chief is predicting far more carnage, and Ukraine’s opposition is reacting with outrage.

Bruno Kahl, the head of the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) made the comments in an interview, saying:

“If a war in Ukraine comes to a standstill earlier than (2029 or 2030), then all the means (of Russia) – both the technical and the material – are able much earlier to provide a threat against Europe.”

In Ukraine, this portion of the interview has been met with sharp backlash.

German newspaper Berliner Zeitung now asks: 

“Will the war be waged on the backs of the Ukraine?” 

Perhaps a ridiculous question concerning it has already been waged on their backs for the last three years.

The paper further writes:

“In Ukraine, that passage is causing excitement. The reading in Kyiv: The German intelligence chief publicly declares that the Ukraine war should not end before 2029. Otherwise, Russia could use its resources faster to pose a threat to Europe.”

In other words, a peace deal would not benefit Europe if it happens before the next five years. Instead, the German chief hints that it is in Europe’s interest to continue sending waves of Ukrainian men to die at the front.

The former prime minister of Ukraine, who still remains one of the most powerful voices in the country, Yulia Tymoshenko, reacted to Kahl’s statements. On her Facebook page, she wrote that “something slipped” out of Kahl’s mouth that Ukrainians “did not want to admit” to themselves.

“Did someone decide to pay for the exhaustion of Russia in the name of security in Europe with the existence of Ukraine and the lives of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians? I never thought that it would be discussed so officially and openly,” she wrote. She then called for Zelensky to immediately end the war and sign a peace agreement.

As chairman of the opposition Fatherland Association, Tymoshenko complained that even the closest allies of Ukraine primarily pursue their own interests. She is calling on the Ukrainian parliament to address Kahl’s statement.

Oleksij Hontscharenko, from the European Solidarity Group, also made a similar statement on Telegram: 

“Not in five or ten years. Let’s end it. To rebuild the economy and expand the army. It is important to preserve our country now, We don’t have to save anyone. We have to save ourselves.”

Ukrainian political scientist Anatoliy Oktysjuk said that Kahl’s statements only confirm what he has been saying for some time.

“Of course, peace negotiations and an end to our war are unfavorable for Europe. Should the Ukrainians struggle as long as possible so that it remains calm in Europe?”

On social media, Oktysjuk wrote that Kahl is only now honestly admitting what Oktysjuk had been talking about for the past two years.

There is growing unease in Ukraine about the humanitarian toll the war is taking on the Ukrainian population, which is seeing the worst demographic development in the entire world due to its high death rate, low birth rate, and a huge wave of emigration. In short, Ukrainians are increasingly fighting for a land that may not exist when the war is over. Already there are calls from business leaders in Ukraine to import Third World migrants to replace the men who have been lost.

Tymoshenko has become more outspoken in the media in recent months and has taken to sniping at Zelensky. Zelensky, however, has nothing to fear, as elections have been suspended in Ukraine as long as the war continues.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/22/2025 – 09:20