56.2 F
Chicago
Monday, November 9, 2026
Home Blog Page 1893

“If I Ever Meet Him I’ll F**kin’ Kill Him”: Dan Crenshaw Threatens To Murder Tucker Carlson

0
“If I Ever Meet Him I’ll F**kin’ Kill Him”: Dan Crenshaw Threatens To Murder Tucker Carlson

Noted neocon Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) threatened to kill journalist Tucker Carlson if the two ever cross paths.

When asked by GB News correspondent Steven Edginton towards the end of an interview if he had ever met Carlson, Crenshaw – aka “Eye Patch McCain” replied: “If I ever meet him I’ll fuckin’ kill him,” adding “No seriously, I would kill him.“

Watch”

When asked by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) if he made the threat, Crenshaw lied – replying “lol, no.”

Here’s Crenshaw discussing Carlson earlier in the interview:

Edginton confirmed it as well, posting on X: “After our interview I asked Dan Crenshaw if he had ever met @TuckerCarlson. He said: “I would kill him if I saw him” I laughed it off. He said: “No seriously, I would kill him”

There’s longstanding animosity between Crenshaw and Carlson, with Crenshaw calling the former Fox News host a “click chaser” and “cowardly know-nothing elitist who is full of shit” last April over Carlson’s interviews with various polarizing figure. Carlson, meanwhile, has called out Crenshaw for giving Joe Biden the power to shut down news websites that challenge mainstream narratives – which Crenshaw said was nothing more than Carlson “lying for attention, as usual.”

*  *  *

Last Day! You can help support ZeroHedge with the purchase of a ZeroHedge Multitool – on sale until midnight tonight… Comes with belt sheath that sports ZH logo.

Click pic… add to cart (grab 2 for free shipping)… check out… receive high quality multitool…

Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 18:50

“Give Us Back Our F**king Money” – How Washington Stole Everything…

0
“Give Us Back Our F**king Money” – How Washington Stole Everything…

Authored by Elizabeth Nickson via ‘Welcome to Absurdistan’ substack,

Every person in your family or community living on nuts and bolts and berries has had his life stolen by the bureaucratic blob.

And, we are going to get it all back.

So essentially the entire town of Washington, D.C. has been stealing. The anomalies are those who are not stealing. $4.7 trillion, almost impossible to trace, represents two-thirds of the annual U.S. budget. And if it’s happening in the U.S., it is happening everywhere: France, Canada, the U.K., Germany, where budgetary processes are probably even more opaque than those of the U.S.

How does the Department of Defence have a $35 trillion black hole?

I used to think of people who worked for the government with a kind of veiled contempt or, in a more benign mood, compassion. I thought of them as pity jobs for those without initiative, as jobs paying off lefty campaigners, as a warehouse for the barely competent. In my own dealings with them, I found them punitive and extractive, papering me with demands to spend more and more money to hire more and more of their pet contractors, to get approval. In my working life, looking at the results of their involvement in America’s rural areas, I hated them for the hell they visited on people unable to fight back. They forced bad science on good people, and refused to see reason. They ruined forests, water courses, fisheries, and township after township turned to dustbowl status. The misery in rural sitting rooms in every state in the U.S. was palpable, long lasting; the green Blob ruined families for generations.

But I did not think of them as being embroiled in a theft so large as to be unparalleled in world history.

The level of the theft has now to be dawning on everyone not living off the public purse which is, what, 60%, 70% of us? The anger setting in is soul-deep, and very very powerful. People who live straightened lives, the poorly pensioned, those living off the laughable social security stipend, those waiting for health care, those whose children can’t even dream of an education, of college, of a six-figure salary which is now subsistence in the ruined cities. Those facing cancer treatment because of the vaccine, and don’t have excess funds. Their families, despairing, hurting, broke.

This isn’t going to go away. It affects everyone. Not addressed down to its deepest level, you are looking at a tax revolt, a national strike. A revolution. A real one, not a papered paid-for color revolution, which is what they have been doing to us.

Those living on social security should have five times the pension they do.

Can you count how many of those there are? Can you?

And meanwhile this:

Is this true? To this date, unknown; the digging continues. Look at this ghastly creature. She apparently has an account in the Cayman Islands. Look at her all compassionate and condescending. She started a war that killed 1.5 million people so far. And apparently got rich from it. A mass murderer celebrated at Upper East Side dinner parties.

Memes like this rocket around, and every one is now suspect. At this point who cares if it’s true, it’s truthy, it makes sense that she made out like a bandit, that Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar have millions hidden somewhere. Ocasio can say “I only have $500,000!” all she wants, but we don’t believe her. If the Wall St Journal says it is false, we don’ t believe them. Do you actually think they’d have the money sitting in their savings account? No, it would be buried off-shore. The media is not only complicit, it is the principal actor in this scam. It built the fantasy world we live in, where people read The Guardian, the Times and the Globe and Mail and think they’re informed.

No, they are being propagandized. And as a result, no one sane believes anything any legacy newspaper or television or media says anymore. They hid the theft. They did not report on it. No one trusts a thing they say.

And this fellow, below, growling what every taxpayer is thinking: firing, disgrace, vitiation of not only the government pension, but your house, your savings, everything. You know what this guy is? Young. Strong. Determined. Imagine an army of them. It’s building. It is very satisfying to listen to him. No wonder they were creating beta-males, dumping hormones in the water supply, the food supply.

DOGE will fire up the citizens of every country, and they all will demand their “fucking money back.” In every country. Every single country, this will grow and grow and grow. Within five years, ten at the outside, the entire world will be a different place.

And as DOGE moves into Defence, State, the IRS, Health, the revealed thieving of the upper middle classes will change the world. No wonder they were trying to disarm us.

Late last year, I thought I’d take a look at one of the papers I used to write for, the Globe and Mail, Canada’s long-time “national newspaper”. Fifteen years ago, I looked at its circulation because I wanted to sell my house, and the richest likely people lived in Calgary. The Globe had 5,000 subscribers in Calgary. It wasn’t worth the advertising dollar. Only three hundred thousand across the country, I noted, which made sense. The Globe at that point, was serious, worthy and dull. Since then it has become corrupt and bought and paid for by the state.

Its number of pages have shrunk by 70%, the physical paper smaller in size by a third. It can’t afford writers like me. It has 35% fewer reporters – mostly desperate kids – and bureaus — but lo and behold, it now has 1,000,000 subscribers!

How is that possible, I asked myself over and over, and it wasn’t until the Politico scandal broke that I realized what had happened.

They had replaced actual people with government subscriptions.

If you page through government accounts at dov.gov/savings, you can read $16,000 annual Politico Pro subscription line items many times in every agency, agriculture, defence, social security, you name it. The government is gaming the subscription numbers. Advertisers, knowing this, have fled, since there is no Return On Investment. If you look here, you will see the number of times various agencies paid subscriptions to Politico, the Washington Post, the Times, the Wall Street Journal, AP, the BBC.

I am not saying that agencies don’t need subscriptions, but I’ll bet the reality of it is more like the discrepancy between the Globe and Mail when it was still thriving at 300K, and the Globe and Mail, now irrelevant, at one million. Did governments not subscribe until 2016?

Thomson Reuters was granted $3,000,000 to effect a large-scale social engineering experiment by USAID/Defence, namely the Covid scam. I would imagine those millions are a fraction of what was actually paid.

Ninety percent of media in Ukraine is funded by the American taxpayer, according to Mike Benz. Ninety percent.

All of them have fake readers, subsidized by the tax payer. This is a moral hazard, obviously. As a reporter, you play for the one who hired you. So, no longer a viable private sector company, but a government granting office, selling government-approved ideas.

Government grants probably push media out of the red; those grants represent profit. Which means the government calls the shots on everything printed. And when I say government I mean permanent bureaucracy. .

Why would you believe anything you read from them?

Equally, you will note in the DOGE records, the number of climate related grants, to places like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Why? What do they do? Well, I’ll tell you what they do, they go round with power points scaring the pants off commodity investors and forcing them into wasteful green ‘programs’, which do absolutely nothing for the “climate”. I’d bet billions are wasted that way.

Climate is a black hole of funding/theft. On Thursday, Lee Zeldin at the EPA reported a $2,000,000,000 grant from the EPA to a group associated with Stacey Abrams, a group whose 2023 donations totalled all of $100. What would they do? Stand up climate protestors, paid climate protestors. Go to schools and scare the kids. Rile up neighborhoods, glue themselves to paintings and sidewalks. The number of actual protestors, not counting the weak hysterics, is near zero. Heading every climate related group is a grim psychological operative, using every trick in the book to turn people into slavering maniacs.

These grants are meant to stand up an army, turn out protestors, spur riots, destroy the Trump presidency. Destroy MAGA. Steal.

DOGE in an initial look found that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid wasted $100 billion in 2023. They found that figure within a day. Where did that money go? To whom? Unknowable since 2/rds of the budget – $4.7 trillion – has no tracing.

Thousands upon thousands of cases of vanishing money.

This is my point: the whole culture, the entirety of the psychological space we walk around in, was manufactured and forced upon us using our money. The reason the ‘media’ failed is not because of digital, it’s because everything it produces is untrue garbage. Every time it took a government grant it lost more readership, because it played to the government. And as time went on, its content bore no relation to any lived reality beyond the subsidized. It became fake, falsified, demonic. So when people started to wake up, they stopped buying it, reading it, watching it. MSNBC and CNN’s audience dropped 50% again after November 5th, for the tenth year in a row.

What replaced it was censorship.

Michael Shellenberger has done the most detailed work on how the censorship apparatus was built. His series on the Censorship Industrial Complex is a must-read.

Given the dank dark hole at the center of legacy media, the military stepped up. This, below, was one of the core meetings – please note that it has 625 views, but nonetheless, received billions of dollars to kill populism across the world. Please note too that the representatives from Google and Facebook oversee policy for Eurasia. You can hear the whole thing analyzed here:

This is the head of the snake

This was a meeting to brainstorm on how to stop “unfiltered alternative media”, and present official views in their place.

Every former CIA head was involved, including retired Generals, Brookings, Homeland Security, CSIS, the universities, the Atlantic Council, the Aspen Institute, the Wilson Center, the National Endowment for Democracy (CIA), with Michael Chertoff as the Blob Monster in chief. USAID gave these jokers $800 million over the last eight years. And that was a fraction of their financing with our money.

Mike Benz has done the best work deconstructing the money flow, its original purpose, its founding and its source. He has tracked it across the world, and only some of it is from the revealed USAID. It was built to attack us, and to fight populism across the world. Specifically. So, therefore, the Globe and Mail, or any paper, can’t afford to hire actual journalists, because what they are doing instead of reporting is manufacturing news aimed against us, as hostiles, on behalf of the regime. They are oriented entirely as follows. World-wide, no matter what.

  • Stop Trump

  • Stop 5 Star – Italy

  • Stop Brexit – UK

  • Stop Vox – Spain

  • Stop AFD – Germany

  • Kill all unfiltered news – treat it as a virus

  • Kill all accounts and narratives that support the above on Google and Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. The war on TikTok? It doesn’t consent to their filters. Or at least not 100%.

And we are beating them. Independent media beat all that mustered intelligence and all that money to tell the truth and elect Trump. Populist movements are roaring across Europe, rejecting all the usual ideas. Populists are in power in the Netherlands, Italy, Austria, Hungary. This weekend Germany will turn out. I suspect, given what I know about election fraud, that fraud will be rampant, but German life is now so dire, AFD may overwhelm the polls.

Here’s my question – What if it was all to hide the grand scale theft?

What if this theft, the trillions a year flowing out to who the hell knows, was the entire purpose of the National Security State? Yes, these grants, the billions spent by USAID were designed to assemble army of dissidents, across the globe, to protect U.S. interests. Thousands of activists paid to agitate against any government going against the aims of the National Security State. USAID stood up LBGTQ groups, dancers, rap stars, theatre people, feminists, abortion activists, every conceivable activist group grubbing for pennies. Feminist groups were financially supported in every country in order to fracture the family.

The purpose wasn’t “aid”, it was to make life in every country contentious, angry, divided against itself, and to guarantee that whenever the CIA wanted, tens of thousands would pour onto the streets to protest. It was rent-a-riot money. It was to put CIA/globalist puppets in charge.

The money was also spent to quash any legitimate protest by populists angry about globalist policies of migration, eternal war, censorship, over-regulation and energy draw-down because of “climate”.

The money was spent to obscure the DC Blobs advance on the wealth of Eurasia.

For instance, the largest army base in the world is now being built in Romania, facing the Russian bear. Your money is building it. Romania refused to certify its election results because a populist anti-war-with-Russia candidate won the election. Which meant no honking military base, no hand over fist theft through the accounting.

As Denz points out, Russia has $75 trillion in natural resources, meaning it is the richest country in the world and the Blob/WEF has their eyes on that prize.

The above cited conference of the Global Censorship Project.took place in 2017. And while its stated purpose was foreign adventure ie censorship and overturning populism, it morphed quickly into a color revolution against Americans. It was easy to shift the algorithms from killing all populist accounts and narratives in western and eastern Europe to killing them in the USA.

Art and Activism

I, and others, have written extensively about the co-opting of popular culture by the CIA, by its seeding and deliberate corruption of the anti-war movement in the 60’s and 70’s, the creation of rap music to fracture the black community, the standing up of movie stars and pop stars to spout regime nonsense. Equally, in eastern Europe, Dua Lipa was sent out to squelch populism in the Balkans. Pussy Riot was stood up against Putin, and twenty-two African rappers were brought over to the States to learn how to fight populism in their own countries. Every election cycle, tired old celebrities do videos about their oh so compassionate vote. Turns out they are all paid by USAID. Can you imagine the tens of thousands of feminist organizations, here and abroad, set up by Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State?

We beat the pants off all of them. Little people in their pjamas in front of laptops, reading, typing, and analyzing patterns and talking to each other, without any money, or power or organization, killed the most powerful army of power-mad supposed brainiacs in the world, wielding billions of dollars against us.

We beat them.

Not one more red cent goes out.

And, we are going to get our money back.

All of it.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 18:25

Crime-Battered NYC McDonald’s Starts Carding People At The Door

0
Crime-Battered NYC McDonald’s Starts Carding People At The Door

A notorious, crime-battered McDonald’s in Brooklyn is going to extreme lengths to defend itself and its patrons — prohibiting anyone who’s under age 20 from entering without a parent and proper identification. 

The outlet at Nostrand and Flatbush avenues has long been the site of violence and bloodshed, but an incident last week seems to have been the last straw that prompted the age-and-ID requirement. Nineteen-year-old manager Amber Hussain tells the New York Post that a group of juveniles that swarmed into the restaurant after school assaulted a security guard and shattered a glass door. 

Excluded teenagers raise their fists at the McDonald’s that’s been the focus of juvenile mayhem for years (Halayne Seidman/ New York Post)

The location has prompted a staggering 324 calls to 911 in the last three years alone, but the location has been a crime hot-spot for more than a dozen years. In a notable 2011 incident captured on video, two thugs ambushed an 18-year-old as he entered, shooting him multiple times. The victim himself had five robbery arrests to his credit before narrowly dodging death at Ronald’s crib: 

According to Hussain’s observations over her year of working at this mayhem-hammered location, here’s what you’d be in for if you visited during after-school afternoon hours: Upwards of 20 teens who come in and “trash the store,” hurl ice at patrons, rob Uber drivers of their bags of food, and fill the restaurant with marijuana smoke. 

The 24-hour restaurant is using security guards to enforce the new policy (Halayne Seidman/ New York Post)

“If you’re from that area, you know that McDonald’s is horrible,” New Yorker Sania Bolasingh told the Post. “People fight in there – it’s not just kids being kids. People get stabbed, a delivery worker got jumped, he passed out.” 

To restore some semblance of order and dignity, the McDonald’s outlet is now barring entry to children and teenagers through age 19 who aren’t accompanied by a parent with proper ID. The Post observed a group of excluded teens standing outside the restaurant and shaking their fists in anger. “What do you expect a business owner to do?” Clyde Smith, a 48-year-old law clerk asked the Post. “This was always a place where kids would cause trouble.”

A peaceful scene, via the no-teen regime (Halayne Seidman/ New York Post)

The downward spiral of America’s cities first brought us merchandise locked behind plexiglass, and now McDonald’s outlets staffed with two security guards at a time barring unsupervised teenagers. TikTokker Sania Kaila toured the Brooklyn restaurant, asking her followers via video, “You see how peaceful this McDonald’s is? You see how there’s no kids, you see how there’s no turmoil, how there’s nobody fighting?” After showing the security guard posted at the door and the sign explaining the new policy, she said, “This is crazy [that it’s come to this]. Stop messing up other people’s place!” 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 18:00

Is Trump Right About Negotiating The War In Ukraine?

0
Is Trump Right About Negotiating The War In Ukraine?

Authored by Daniel Lacalle,

When we talk about the war in Ukraine, I agree with supporting the invaded country. 

Let my position be clear. 

However, to understand President Trump’s position, we must remember several factors.

First: The war has stalled, and Russia is advancing, even if I don’t like it. 

By early 2025, the Russian army controlled about 18% of Ukraine’s territory. It added 1,500 square miles over the course of 2024, almost twice the size of London.

Second: Sanctions against Russia have failed. 

I was the first to defend them, but I warned that if Asia didn’t join, they would fail. Between 2022 and 2024, Russia’s trade surplus has reached over $600 billion. Russian products are exported all over the world and in many cases, they are sold in the European Union via China or India.

Third: The European Union’s position with the United States cannot be one of indignation when it maintains growing strategic ties with China, Russia’s partner and ally “without limits” or when EU leaders speak of Putin as a murderous dictator but treat him as an uncomfortable partner.

The European Union’s position cannot be in confrontation with Trump. The EU excluded the import of Russian liquefied natural gas from sanctions. In 2024, EU imports of Russian liquefied natural gas reached a record $7 billion. France, Spain, and Belgium accounted for 85% of those. Spain has imported more than $8.9 billion of Russian liquefied natural gas since the beginning of the war, and the European Union nearly $21 billion.

Fourth: Almost 18% of Ukraine’s population is Russian, about 8.4 million people.

Fifth: President Trump’s position on Ukraine is not a shock or a surprise from a week ago. 

He clarified his stance on Ukraine more than a year ago, specifically in February 2024, and reiterated it throughout the campaign. European Union leaders assumed he would not win the elections by a wide margin and that, if he did, he would not fulfil his promises. The war in Ukraine has cost the American taxpayer more than $350 billion, and in the United States, this war is not perceived as we see it in European media.

Let’s not forget that the EU geopolitical “experts” told us that the war would be quick, that Ukraine would undoubtedly win it, and that sanctions would lead to Russia conceding defeat, and that the Russian people, with the help of the oligarchs, would oust Putin from power. Well, three years later, they must explain several things to us.

What is the “position of the European Union”? On paper, the European Union supports Ukraine unconditionally, yet it continues to purchase billions of dollars’ worth of Russian liquefied natural gas and maintains privileged relations with China, Putin’s key strategic partner.

The position of the European Union leaders seems to be to do nothing, let the United States pay for it, and complain because they are not considered in the decision process.

Moreover, if the European Union’s position is that the only solution is a resounding victory for Ukraine, the actions of its member states betray them. Waiting for the media to forget and conceal the victory is insufficient if the EU desires an unappealable outcome.

A total victory for Ukraine would only come with a continent-wide military and economic confrontation against Russia and China, and only if it ended in a victory for NATO.

According to Byron York, “European leaders are upset about their exclusion from the Ukraine talks. They feel their no-ideas-no-agreement-on-how-to-proceed-but-plenty-of-platitudes perspective would be a valuable part of the negotiation.”

The European Union policy is to entrench this war, stop talking about it, and have the US pay for it. Fascinating.

President Trump is following the mandate of the American voters. 77 million votes, all swing states, Congress, and the Senate. Trump’s voters and many of Harris’s do not see this war as something the taxpayer should fund. Why? The EU’s own actions contradict the apocalyptic image they portray to us.

European leaders talk about Putin as if he were Hitler but behave with him as if he were Brezhnev. And Americans don’t buy that narrative. In fact, politicians who accuse Trump of giving wings to Putin, which hasn’t happened, keep quiet in the face of evidence that they did give him wings and armour with their ductile sanctions.

Former British diplomat John Foreman explains in The Spectator that “Europe is now in panic because it has become accustomed to the comfort provided by the United States in terms of security, has not paid attention to what Trump has been saying, and has not adequately prepared for his second presidency. The consequences of this strategic miscalculation are beginning to become clear.”

While President Trump does not view Putin as a threat, he recognises China as one. Therefore, he understands the importance of halting the waste of taxpayer funds in a war that the EU ignores. He intends to use these funds to fortify the U.S. in other areas against China and to reach an agreement in Ukraine before the evidence threatens the country’s existence. Furthermore, he remains unflinching and understands that the failure to negotiate could lead to Europe’s downfall in the medium run. Chinese support shields Russia’s position. The indignant European leaders, who simultaneously embrace China, rarely mention that “small” detail.

President Trump’s remarks about Zelensky sound very aggressive in Europe. However, we must remember that Zelensky stopped the efforts to investigate Hunter Biden’s businesses in Ukraine and rejecting new elections may be accepted by the constitution, but, as Thomas Di Lorenzo, president of the Mises Institute, points out, it can be seen as a “constitutional dictatorship.”

“If Europe is obsessed with retreating to irrelevance through its local totalitarianism, economic stagnation, or getting into a continental war, American taxpayers are not obliged to help them,” Connor O’Keefe says in Mises, quite rightly.

President Trump has not conceded or given away anything. What he has done is wake up the oligarchic bureaucracy and offer a door to a realistic peace solution. The alternative was nothing.

The negotiation will be complex, tough, and, of course, it will be good for Ukraine, or it won’t happen. The alternative is the current condescension, incompetence, and inaction.

If the European Union wants to think it’s winning the war and that it is relevant by sticking its head in a hole, making another summit of bureaucrats, and thinking that China is a friendly partner just passing by, that’s their problem. But Americans are not going to pay for it.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 17:40

Watch: Joy Reid Breaks Down In Tears After Getting Fired From MSNBC

0
Watch: Joy Reid Breaks Down In Tears After Getting Fired From MSNBC

Update (1715ET):  After spending years as a race-baiting propagandist, now-former MSNBC host Joy Reid broke down in tears following her ouster from the network, insisting on a Sunday Zoom Call on the “Win With Black Women” podcast, that she “went hard,” and that her show “had value.”

Watch:

Needless to say, Reid can cry harder…

*  *  *

Last Day! You can help support ZeroHedge with the purchase of a ZeroHedge Multitool ,on sale until midnight tonight… Comes with belt sheath that sports ZH logo.

Click pic… add to cart (grab 2 for free shipping)… check out… receive high quality multitool…

Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.

A major shake-up is underway at MSNBC as the network’s new president has canceled far-left prime-time host Joy Reid’s show, “The ReidOut,” multiple sources familiar with the changes confirmed to The New York Times.

Reid’s final episode is planned for sometime this week, according to sources, adding that her prime-time spot will be swapped out with several anchors, including political commentator Symone Sanders Townsend, former Democratic strategist and former chairman of the Republican National Committee Michael Steele, and journalist Alicia Menendez. 

The move signals Rebecca Kutler’s effort to overhaul MSNBC after being named the network’s president earlier this month. Ratings have plummeted since Trump secured the White House in last November’s presidential election. Many hosts, including Reid, have been visibly struggling with severe cases of “TDS.”

“Joy Reid’s show getting canceled is devastating news for the left. Now where will they go for their daily dose of race-baiting lies and far-left conspiracy theories?!” journalist Breanna Morello wrote on X. 

The crazed TV host has been one of the loudest Trump bashers in corporate media and still does not have enough common sense to understand the Overton Window shifted last summer from artificially being held at the left to now center-right. 

Yet, to this day, she continues to spread far-left misinformation and disinformation propaganda, even as ratings plummet—not just for her show, but for the entire network.

Nielsen Media Research data shows that viewership for the ReidOut show has crashed 50% since Trump won the election. 

The latest cable news ratings as of Feb. 20 show that MSNBC was ahead of CNN but well behind Fox News in the prime-time news race. 

Here’s some of the looney batshit crazy toxic propaganda the woke host (soon to be unemployed) pushed to the American people:

And it gets worse:

Oh – and remember when this happened?

Back to Kutler, a former senior executive at CNN, who has made it very clear that MSNBC faces severe headwinds in the Trump era. 

“Our jobs are hard on a normal day, and these are not normal times,” Kutler told MSNBC employees on her first day. This comes as the dying network is being spun off by cable giant Comcast, NBCUniversal’s parent company.

More shake-ups at MSNBC are ahead. NYT explained: 

Other major changes are expected at MSNBC. In January, Rachel Maddow, the network’s best-known anchor, returned to hosting her 9 p.m. show five days a week during the first 100 days of the Trump administration after having scaled back to only Mondays. At the time, the network said that Alex Wagner, who had hosted the 9 p.m. show four days a week, would return at the end of April.

That is no longer the case. Instead, MSNBC is planning to appoint a new anchor to fill Ms. Wagner’s spot, the two people said. A likely candidate for that hour is Jen Psaki, a former White House press secretary in the Biden administration, who hosts shows on Sunday at noon and 8 p.m. on Mondays, the people said, though adding that this decision hadn’t been finalized.

This comes as dying corporate media has spent the last 15 years pushing an info war of a woke agenda on the American people to divide the nation instead of actually reporting the news. The result has been not only a collapse in public trust but also a sharp decline in ratings.

Not even the government’s censorship blob could keep leftist corporate media alive, as alternative news media is set to flourish in an era under Trump’s executive order called “Restoring Freedom Speech and Ending Federal Censorship.”

*  *  *

You can support ZeroHedge by purchasing one of these high-quality, sharp, kickass ZeroHedge Multitools which comes with belt pouch. On sale until Monday!

Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 17:20

The American Rōnin: How Displaced “Disinformation Experts” Are Seeking New Opportunities In Europe And Academia

0
The American Rōnin: How Displaced “Disinformation Experts” Are Seeking New Opportunities In Europe And Academia

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

President Trump’s election has brought about mass layoffs among federal employees and contractors, including some who have sued and others who have protested.

But one group — that of America’s would-be censors — is taking its cause worldwide.

During the Biden administration, a massive industry took root, sweeping up billions in taxpayer funds to research, target and combat those accused of misinformation, disinformation and “malinformation.”

Although the exact number is uncertain, many trained censors are now facing unemployment. 

These self-described “disinformation experts” have become the modern equivalent of rōnin, the Japanese samurai who found themselves without a master and wandered the land looking for a new use of their skill set. They are finding precisely that calling in academia, not-for-profit groups and, most importantly, Europe.

A speech-regulation industry that was booming under Biden has gone bust under Trump. Over the last four years, massive amounts of money were poured into universities, non-governmental organizations and other groups in an unprecedented alliance of government, academia and corporations.

The media lionized many in the industry as “saving democracy” by controlling, targeting and suppressing others’ political speech. Not only did federal agencies fund these efforts, but they also coordinated censorship of groups and individuals with opposing views, even objecting to jokes on the internet.

Universities cashed in on this largesse as well. It was popular with most liberal administrators and lucrative for academics.

The sudden shutoff of the federal spigot comes as a blow, but it does not mean the speech warriors will simply convert their censor-shields into plowshares. Many will follow in the footsteps of Nina Jankowicz, briefly the head of a now-defunct disinformation governance board. After the outcry over the board, Jankowicz quickly found her skills were in demand in Europe.

Free speech has been in free-fall in Europe for decades. Germany has long enforced a robust system of speech criminalization that began with Nazi symbolism but steadily expanded to include inciteful speech, insults and merely “disinformative” statements. The United Kingdom and France showed the same insatiable appetite for the inexorable expansion of censorship and prosecutions.

The European Union has also been ground zero for the anti-free speech movement’s aggressive use of the Digital Services Act, which bars speech that is viewed as “disinformation” or “incitement.”

When it passed over the objections of free speech advocates, European Commission Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager was perfectly ecstatic, declaring it is “not a slogan anymore, that what is illegal offline should also be seen and dealt with as illegal online. Now, it is a real thing. Democracy’s back.”

That is why Vice President J.D. Vance’s recent speech in Munich was so historic. For the free speech community, Vance went into the belly of the beast and denounced the anti-free-speech movement in the heart of Europe.

The response to the Vance speech has been nothing short of panic in the anti-free-speech community. Many are assembling in conferences in Europe, including the upcoming World Forum in Berlin. Bill and Hillary Clinton will be in attendance. (I will also be speaking at the conference.)

It was Hillary Clinton who, after Elon Musk purchased Twitter with the pledge to dismantle the censorship system, called upon the EU to force him and others to censor her fellow U.S. citizens. She embraced the infamous Digital Services Act, which seeks to impose a global system of speech control. She has also suggested the arrest of those spreading disinformation.

Immediately after the speech, familiar European and American voices denounced Vance and doubled down on the need for Europe to hold the line against dangerous free speech.

For the free speech community, there could not be a better place for this debate to unfold. Germany has demonstrated the false claims of the anti-free-speech community over the years. Indeed, you might call their arguments “disinformation.”

Vance and others who have challenged the European censorship systems have been attacked as Nazi enablers or sympathizers. Many of those who have fostered this attack are part of the regulator ronin. Others simply repeated the narrative without thought or support.

Take CBS anchor Margaret Brennan, who confronted Secretary of State Marco Rubio over the outrageous fact that Vance was supporting free speech while “standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide.” The claim is stupefyingly uninformed. The first thing that the Nazis did in coming to power was to crack down and criminalize free speech — just as many on the left have done in European countries.

A few have insisted that the Nazis were brought to power by the lack of government controls over what views could be expressed. But this is not true either. The crushing irony is that Article 118 of the Weimar Constitution guaranteed free speech only “within the limits of the general laws.” It did not protect statements deemed by the government as factually untrue, and speech was actively regulated.

Adolf Hitler, for example, was barred from speaking publicly. The Nazis did not use free speech because they did not have it. They did, however, use the denial of free speech to claim that the government was afraid to have certain views aired in public.

Germany has replicated the old system that failed to stop (and perhaps even helped) the Nazis, doubling down on speech controls and criminalization. As I discuss in my book, there has never been a successful censorship system in the history of the world — not one. Germany is again a chilling example of the true record of such systems.

Past polling of German citizens found that only 18 percent felt free to express their opinions in public. Only 17 percent felt free to express themselves on the internet. So the neo-Nazi movement is flourishing, even as average German citizens feel chilled in their own speech.

Despite this history, the regulatory ronin are hard at work to scare the public back into empowering and especially into funding their efforts.

The outgoing chairman of the Munich Security Conference spoke through tears as he expressed his “fear” that Vance’s call for free speech could take hold in Europe. He tellingly added, “It is clear that our rules-based international order is under pressure. It is my strong belief … that this multipolar world needs to be based on a single set of norms and principles.”

This “international order” has striven to impose a single set of norms on speech, particularly through vehicles like the Digital Services Act. The effort stands at odds with the very essence of the American constitutional system and values.

The only thing both sides agree on is that this is an existential fight. For those in the free speech community, it will determine the future of what Justice Louis Brandeis called “the indispensable right.” For the other side, it is the future of a European model of free speech, limiting the right to deter those with extreme or inciteful views.

The recent successes in the U.S. at X and more recently at Meta are real. However, the displaced speech regulators are not just going to retool and learn to code or train to work in the hospitality industry.

As Vance’s speech showed, we are more isolated than ever. Even Americans like Clinton have joined with the Europeans to fight for censorship. It is time to take a side and fight for freedom of speech.

*  *  *

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 17:00

Dem Who Suggested Using “Actual Weapons” On Elon Says He’s The One Being Threatened

0
Dem Who Suggested Using “Actual Weapons” On Elon Says He’s The One Being Threatened

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

A Democratic Representative who claimed supporters want to see “actual weapons” used against Elon Musk in physical confrontations has complained that he is really the one being threatened.

Yes, really.

Democrat Robert Garcia of California has claimed that he’s facing “intimidation” after a US Attorney sent him a letter regarding the comments asking him to clarify what he meant.

The US Attorney for DC, Ed Martin writes that “This sounds to some like a threat to Mr. Musk – an appointed representative of President Donald Trump…We take threats to public officials very seriously. I look forward to your cooperation.”

Garcia, who also called Musk a “dick,” whined that it is “crazy that they want to investigate me for essentially using a metaphor and wanting to take on Elon Musk.”

Garcia attempted to justify his previous assertion about weapons, asserting “We’ve got to fight fire with fire.”

It’s not a metaphor when you’re suggesting using “actual weapons.” That’s the entire point.

Garcia could’ve taken the L, apologised and admitted his use of the phrase was a poor choice. Instead he’s tripling down.

Leftists have lost it with Trump retaking office.

Their rhetoric is heating up rapidly and violence is brewing.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 14:40

Trump’s MAGA Policies Are Widely Popular; New Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll Shows

0
Trump’s MAGA Policies Are Widely Popular; New Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll Shows

A new Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll shows that most Americans support President Trump’s agenda to “Make America Great Again,” which includes beefing up the southern and northern borders and deporting criminal illegal aliens, unleashing DOGE on the corrupt federal bureaucracy, ending all toxic forms of DEI initiatives in the federal government, military, and corporate America, and ensuring the nation is energy independent. Meanwhile, approval for the Democratic Party has collapsed to record lows as radical leftist lawmakers double and triple down on woke policies.

The new poll captures the nation’s vibe during Trump’s first month in office, with 52% of respondents approving the president’s MAGA agenda, such as coming in like a wrecking ball into the DC Swamp, leveraging DOGE to slash government spending, ending globalist open-border policies, and prioritizing the restoration of American values. Most Americans overwhelmingly supported this approach after four years of globalist disaster under the Biden-Harris regime. 

“The majority of voters support Trump’s policies on the border, focus on government expenditures, gender, DEI, and offshore drilling but have concerns on his foreign policies involving tariffs, the Israel-Hamas war, and the war in Ukraine,” the report featuring the poll data stated.

Mark Penn, Co-Director of the Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll, commented on the results, stating, “People are taking a generally positive wait-and-see attitude for Trump but have really reassessed their attitudes toward Biden, Harris, and the Democrats, taking a much harsher, more negative attitude,” adding, “Trump has a real opportunity here – we’re seeing a healthy, trudging approval edging toward real approval based on how the next couple of months turn out.”

The 2,443 respondents were asked about their views on the country’s direction since Trump took office. 42% of them answered that the country is now on the right track, an increase of 14 percentage points since January. 

Similarly, 38% of respondents say the economy is on the right track, up 10 percentage points from last month. 

Nearly half say the economy is stronger today than it has been since 2021. 

About a third say their personal financial situation has improved, while the number of folks who say the economic environment is getting worse shifted lower. 

Trump’s approval rating with voters in the first month stands at 52%. 

Trump is drastically outperforming Biden on key issues… 

Chart of the day: Democratic Party’s approval rating has collapsed to record lows. 

Inflation and immigration remain the top issues for voters. 

Democrats lack situational awareness, doubling and tripling down and taking marching orders from Hillary Clinton’s bag of dirty tricks, such as continuing to call Trump and Musk “Nazis” etc… 

As we previously noted, many of these polls are skewed to the left. If that’s the case here, Trump’s approval rating is likely much—much higher. 

With USAID funding slashed, the censorship blob in DC in turmoil, MSM in collapse (look at what happened to Joy Reid), and the left’s grip on shaping toxic MSM narratives (division) eroded, the Trump administration now has a unique opportunity to unite the country by addressing crises—emerging as the hero and steering the nation out of the ‘Fourth Turning’ and into a ‘First Turning’ of prosperity.

Even a CBS poll a few weeks ago stunned the Democratic Party… 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 14:20

Macron Interrupts, Contradicts Trump On ‘Getting Our Money Back’ From Ukraine: “No!”

0
Macron Interrupts, Contradicts Trump On ‘Getting Our Money Back’ From Ukraine: “No!”

Update(1415ET): President Trump said Monday while hosting French President Emmanuel Macron at the The White house Ukrainian President Zelensky could be coming to the Oval Office as soon as “this week” to sign a “final deal” on rare earth minerals access.

“It looks like we’re getting very close. The deal’s being worked on,” Trump told the press pool, with a nervous and anxious-looking Macron sitting next to him.  “We’re I think getting very close to getting an agreement where we get our money back over a period of time,” Trump added, referencing prior demands to be paid back some $500 billion after years of heavy weapons and funds sent to Kiev.

“I will be meeting with President Zelenskyy. In fact, he may come in this week or next week to sign the agreement… The agreement is being worked on now. They are very close to a final deal,” Trump stressed. Watch:

Axios has obtained a draft agreement being currently worked on, and provides the following…

 “The Government of the United States of America intends to provide a long-term financial commitment to the development of a stable and economically prosperous Ukraine,” the draft says. It says the fund will be designed “so as to invest in projects in Ukraine and attract investments to increase development,” including in areas like mining and ports.

It suggests the US will recoup some its losses “defending, reconstructing, and returning Ukraine” to its pre-war GDP. Zelensky has meanwhile rejected the concept of ‘repaying’ Washington for what’s been given through the course of the war.

An awkward public disagreement happened just as Trump was talking… “No!” Macron openly interjected…

By the end of the tense, unexpected exchange between the two leaders, a visibly annoyed Trump quipped, “If you believe that, it’s OK with me…”.

* * *

By all accounts the hold-up in the US and Ukraine potentially agreeing to a final mineral deal has been President Zelensky’s refusal to sign – seeing in it selling off Ukraine’s economic sovereignty; however, sources on both sides strongly suggest a deal is very close.

“I will not sign what ten generations of Ukrainians will have to pay back,” said President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a press conference Sunday. President Trump is seeking access to some $500 billion in the country’s minerals, including rare earths, to repay Washington for its wartime aid.

Getty Images

Kiev as well as many of its European partners have complained that the deal offers no clear security guarantees or even the promise of future aid in return. Instead it appears set up to repay the US billions in past aid, and Ukrainian officials and the media have described it as punitive. 

The Ukrainian leader described this weekend:

“Let’s first clarify the $500 billion figure. I know that we had $100 billion [in US aid provided to Ukraine], and that’s a fact. But I’m not going to acknowledge $500 billion, regardless of what anyone says, with all due respect to our partners,” Zelensky told reporters at the “Ukraine Year 2025” forum.

Still, there appears have been some weekend progress, and the Zelensky government knows it’s in no position to fiercely push back, also given that the Trump administration is essentially calling for a near-future change in leadership at this point, having blasted Zelensky as a ‘dictator’.

“Ukrainian and U.S. teams are in the final stages of negotiations regarding the minerals agreement. The negotiations have been very constructive, with nearly all key details finalized. We are committed to completing this swiftly to proceed with its signature,” Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Justice Olga Stefanishyna stated on X Monday.

“We hope both US and UA leaders might sign and endorse it in Washington the soonest to showcase our commitment for decades to come,” Stefanishyna added.

A fresh description from US officials involved say the deal will commit to a “free, sovereign and secure” Ukraine and achieving a “lasting peace” as part of it. This will include the US agreeing to “durable partnership” between Washington and Kiev, the texts shows as reported by Bloomberg.

The latest draft also stipulates that those who “acted adversely” to Ukraine in the war should not “benefit from its reconstruction” – Bloomberg has also noted.

Earlier this month, when talk of a mineral deal plan was first being floated by the White House, Zelensky expressed openness, though he was also likely attempting to be diplomatic and conciliatory, not thinking such an agreement would be pushed this hard by Trump, or realistically get off the ground.

“If we are talking about a deal, then let’s do a deal, we are only for it,” Zelensky had told Reuters at the time. The Ukrainian leader insisted the deal wouldn’t involve “giving away” Ukraine’s resources but framed it as a partnership.

But now with the details being hammered out and put into place, he clearly understands it to be very heavily skewed in Washington’s favor, and not benefiting future generations of Ukrainians.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 14:15

Solana Vs Ethereum – A Tale Of Two Blockchains

0
Solana Vs Ethereum – A Tale Of Two Blockchains

Authored by Marie Poteriaieva via CoinTelegraph.com,

The Solana-Ethereum blockchain duel has never been more exciting to watch. While the ambitious newcomer showcases its high speed, user-friendliness, and low fees, the revered incumbent still boasts the most developed ecosystem among smart contract platforms.

Market reactions vary widely. Some analysts expect Solana to continue outperforming Ethereum in terms of user activity and DApp revenues, which could drive SOL’s price higher. The increasing likelihood of a SOL ETF approval adds further momentum. Others, however, anticipate Ethereum reclaiming dominance in 2025, citing historical price trends, growing ETH accumulation by whales, and upcoming technological upgrades.

Is ETH price on the verge of bottoming out?

Ether’s price performance in 2024 was underwhelming, appreciating by just 65%, compared to SOL’s 95% gain. In Jan. 2025, SOL claimed a new all-time high, while ETH remained below its peak from Nov. 2021.

SOL/USD 1-day chart. Source: Bloomberg

Currently, ETH is down 33% from its cycle high of $4,116, prompting speculation that a bottom may be forming. On Feb. 10, crypto analyst IncomeSharks posted a chart on X suggesting ETH is ranging, with the recent wick to $2,156 signaling a potential bottom.

“Everyone is afraid to call that wick a bottom, but it is. The largest volume candle and liquidation event are even more confirmation.”

ETH/USD 1-day chart. Source: IncomeSharks on TradingView

Another X user specialized in crypto charting, Tony “The Bull” Severino, noted that “ETH/BTC is oversold on the monthly RSI for the first time ever in its history.” RSI stands for relative strength index, a momentum indicator that measures the magnitude of recent price changes. Typically, when an RSI is in the “oversold” zone, i.e. below 30, it signals an impending trend reversal. On Feb. 10. Ether’s RSI fell to 28, later returning to the 41 level.

Another notable trend is ETH accumulation. French crypto analyst Crypto Futur pointed out that since December, the number of whale ETH addresses (holding over 1,000 ETH) has been steadily growing. Over the past two months, only four days have been negative in whale addresses 30-day change.

Ethereum Whale Address Count. Source: Glassnode

Regarding SOL’s price performance, some analysts believe that as a “younger version” of Ethereum, it could mirror Ether’s price trajectory. As noted by the crypto analyst Inmortal on X, 

“In early 2021, a lot of people were trying to guess the top on $ETH. But in spite of everything, we continued to make higher lows. It reminds me of $SOL this year.”

SOL/ETH chart. Source: Bloomberg

With ETH’s market cap being three times that of SOL, a similar trajectory for Solana could push its price beyond $500.

Is “utility” the metric investors associate with value?

Beyond price speculation, a blockchain’s native coin’s value is closely tied to the blockchain’s performance. The more active the blockchain’s ecosystem is and the more revenue its DApps generate, the stronger the coin’s price fundamentals become.

In the Solana-Ethereum duel, Solana seems like a clear leader in revenues, often exceeding Ethereum’s daily earnings tenfold. Moreover, according to Nansen’s CEO Alex Svanevik, 

“Solana has beaten Ethereum on almost every metric: active addresses, transactions, DEX volume, total gas fees. The only one missing is TVL.”

Yet, not everyone is convinced. 

As IncomeSharks notes,

“So much has already been built on [Ethereum] chain. People say “SOL” is fast and cheap as they lose 99% of their position on a useless meme that rugs. There’s nothing unique being built on SOL other than more casinos.”

The launch of Uniswap’s Uninet on Feb. 11 marks another step in the Ethereum ecosystem development. 

However, Ethereum’s L2 solutions still face a major challenge: they are siloed. While bridges exist to connect Ethereum to its L2s and between L2s themselves, they remain complex and potentially insecure for both users and developers. To remedy that, several notable Ethereum L2 upgrades, such as Polygon’s Agglayer, Uniswap’s Across, or Base’s RIP-7755, are expected to come in 2025, potentially solving the interoperability problem.

ETH and SOL battle for institutional investor adoption

Spot ETH ETFs were approved in July 2024, with nine firms, including BlackRock and Fidelity, launching their own funds. Initially, their performance was disappointing, with outflows from Grayscale’s (ETHE) converted fund dominating the first five months. However, since Nov. 2024, inflows have started picking up, now totaling $3.18 billion of net inflows, according to CoinGlass.

Meanwhile, anticipation for a Solana spot ETF has been growing. On Feb. 10, Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart updated his forecast, assigning a 70% probability for a SOL ETF approval in 2025. His colleague Eric Balchunas added that these odds were “

Yet, ETF approval does not guarantee strong performance. According to the onchain analytics firm Messari, “Even with an SOL ETF, ETF bidders are far more likely to choose ETH over SOL.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/24/2025 – 14:00