61.3 F
Chicago
Tuesday, October 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 1957

From RWA Boom To Bitcoin Yields: Top Crypto Trends To Watch In 2025

0
From RWA Boom To Bitcoin Yields: Top Crypto Trends To Watch In 2025

Authored by Ana Paula Pereira via CoinTelegraph.com,

The year 2024 will be remembered as a landmark chapter in crypto history. From surging mainstream demand for Bitcoin-regulated financial products to an expected crypto-friendly White House, the Web3 industry has made significant strides despite facing notable challenges along the way.

With its resilience finally paying off, the industry is now setting its sights on another promising year as hopes for regulatory clarity converge with years of innovation and development.

Experts are closely watching emerging trends poised to not only redefine the crypto landscape but also affect the world as a whole. To explore what lies ahead, Cointelegraph has compiled a list of key crypto trends expected to take center stage in the months to come.

RWAs: The use case to watch in 2025

If you have never heard about it, make a note of this word: tokenization. It refers to the art of turning traditional assets into tokens, making them tradable, even in small fractions. 

Developers, investors and companies from a range of industries were enraptured by the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) fever in 2024, as it unlocks liquidity for traditionally nonliquid assets, such as real estate, and allows people around the world to access investments not always accessible to small investors. 

“RWAs are the use case to watch in 2025. The value of tokenized assets will double in the year,” predicts Sergey Gorbunov, CEO of Interop Labs and co-founder of Axelar Network. 

Gorbunov’s view is followed by venture capital firm a16z. In its annual report on trends in the crypto and blockchain industry, the VC said that “tokenizing unconventional assets could redefine income generation in the digital age.”

According to data from RWA.xyz, the total value of tokenized assets now stands at nearly $13.9 billion, a 67% jump from $8.3 billion in January.

Real-world assets onchain are now worth over $13.8 billion. Source: RWA.xyz

Financial institutions are now looking at risk frameworks for tokenized assets. In other words, they want to ensure compliance with legal requirements, security risks and market volatility issues are addressed. According to Gurbunov:

“Multiple major financial institutions will develop the risk frameworks needed to issue RWAs that can move across interconnected, public blockchains.”

ID checks by AI agents

Several protocols have been working on ways to provide ID verification onchain over the past few years. 

One of the advancements in this field is undoubtedly the emergence of zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs, a technology that allows a human to prove themselves without revealing any personal information. Startups developing this technology include Worldcoin, ONCHAINID and RisedID, to name a few. 

Moving forward, onchain biometric verification is expected to be increasingly powered by artificial intelligence. In other words, you will be checked for your identity autonomously onchain by an AI. This may sound like something out of a sci-fi movie, but it’s just an example of AI and blockchain coming together.

“We expect to see automated biometrics and/or government ID checks become the norm, not the exception,” said Civic CEO Chris Hart. He continued: 

“As AI agents increasingly act on behalf of users, robust identity verification and authorization frameworks will be crucial for controlling what these agents can do and for how long — especially in financial transactions.”

DePINs to take off

Community-driven energy services, online storage and internet connectivity are already a reality through decentralized physical infrastructure networks, or DePINs. 

DePINs allow users to become stakeholders in the network, meaning they can own a piece of the infrastructure they use, thus creating new opportunities for financial inclusion.

Borderless Capital, a venture firm pouring millions of dollars into DePIN protocols, claims the sector holds “the most compelling opportunity” in Web3.

“It is the only Web3 vertical generating revenue and fundamentals with zero correlation to the crypto market, delivering real-world value,” Álvaro Gracia, partner at Borderless, told Cointelegraph.

According to data aggregated by DePIN.Ninja, the market capitalization of DePIN protocols has exceeded $50 billion.

More yields from Bitcoin

Finally, it is impossible to discuss 2025 without mentioning Bitcoin. Once a discredited asset, Bitcoin has made significant strides over the past decade, earning adoption within Wall Street and solidifying its position in the financial landscape.

While developers still struggle with possible upgrades to a network that now has more stakeholders than ever before, startups are exploring alternative ways to unlock yield generation for holders.

“This is the natural need for holders, including the retail and institution. This is the native demand for holders,” said Kevin He of Bitlayer, a Bitcoin layer-2 protocol backed by asset manager firm Franklin Templeton.

According to He, not only investors but also large holders of BTC, such as MicroStrategy, are looking for additional sources of revenue through the fusion of Bitcoin and decentralized finance. 

According to He, Bitcoiners could soon generate annual returns of up to 40% on their holdings.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 17:40

Vegas Police Say “Very Strange Similarities” Between Cybertruck Bombing & Bourbon Street Massacre

0
Vegas Police Say “Very Strange Similarities” Between Cybertruck Bombing & Bourbon Street Massacre

Welcome to the second day of 2025.

*   *   *

Update (1736ET): 

Academy Securities published a note summarizing the views of four retired US generals on the Cybertruck bombing and the New Orleans terrorist attack:

General Spider Marks: “Most importantly, we must acknowledge that terrorism in its many forms (both kinetic and non-kinetic) will never be eliminated or determined irrelevant. As the investigation continues, we’ll know more about the motivation of the attack. Regardless, all forms of terrorism require a network of inspiration and support. Where isolation occurs, virtual access to a ‘community’ of shared interests and beliefs provides a readily available justification for action. There is no ‘lone wolf’ anymore. More facts to follow, but terrorism still exists.”

General John Evans: “It is likely premature to assess motives, motivations, and linkages. However, the ‘vehicle as a weapon’ TTP (tactics, techniques, and procedures) that we have seen used with devastating effect in Europe (and the US), although not new, now creates yet another attack vector which local, state, and federal law enforcement must plan for at events such as the gathering we saw in New Orleans. Individuals suffering from political or personal disenfranchisement can now leverage the ubiquity of motor vehicles to inflict great harm in virtually any setting, since most security plans only focus on keeping vehicles away from critical nodes or VIPs.”

General Robert Ashley: “The intel community will be focused on any reflections on the attack which normally would happen within the first 24-36 hours. Given the domestic nature of the attack, I would expect a joint White House/FBI announcement in the near-term if there is a foreign nexus, otherwise updates will likely remain in law enforcement channels. We become less vigilant with each passing day. Significant calendar events (New Year’s) and major public events require greater vigilance, which means increased funding for the security forces that protect all of us daily. Moreover, it will require greater tolerance by the public regarding the associated delays of enhanced force protection. As this unfolds, it will be key to uncover the attacker’s network (domestic and/or foreign) and to determine if there are any foreign connections (that include nation state involvement) that may have assisted or motivated the attacker(s).”

General Rick Waddell: “It is too early to say anything decisive, but if news accounts are in any way accurate then: 1) more people than just the driver were involved in NOLA; 2) this terror cell spent time preparing and planting IEDs; and 3) NOLA was changing out its bollards blocking vehicular traffic from Bourbon Street and were months into the project with a targeted completion date before the 2025 Super Bowl, but not before the New Year’s celebrations or the Sugar Bowl. In the absence of the bollards, a police vehicle was used to block the entrance to Bourbon Street, but the killer avoided the blocking vehicle by simply driving onto the sidewalk. What is unknown is whether the NOLA event is connected to what now looks like a suicide vehicle bombing outside the Trump Tower in Las Vegas. Both attacks used vehicles that were rented through the app Turo. As Spider points out, terrorism is with us and won’t go away. We can harden likely targets, we can put up barriers (like the bollards) before key events, we can increase guard forces for key facilities and key events, and we can use intelligence and law enforcement methods to penetrate terrorist cells.”

*   *   *

Update (1518ET): 

In Vegas, Clark County Sheriff Kevin McMahill told reporters that the Cybertruck bomber, Matthew Livelsberger, shot himself in the head before the vehicle exploded.

McMahill stated that a handgun was found at Livelsberger’s feet. However, this is not definitive evidence about the timing of the death. Remember, the Cybertruck has Full Self-Driving… 

More headlines from the press conference: 

  • LAS VEGAS POLICE: FOUND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WEAPON IN CYBERTRUCK

  • LAS VEGAS POLICE: ALSO FOUND MILITARY ID IN CYBERTRUCK

  • LVMPD: SUBJECT WENT TO SEVERAL PLACES ALONG LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD

  • ATF: GUNS WERE LAWFULLY PURCHASED BY LIVELSBERGER; GUNS WERE PURCHASED ON DEC. 30

  • FBI: NO IDEOLOGY LEADING TO TRUMP, TESLA IN CYBERTRUCK BLAST

Here’s where things get interesting… 

At an earlier press conference in New Orleans: 

  • FBI: NO ‘DEFINITIVE LINK’ BETWEEN ATTACK IN NOLA AND LAS VEGAS

Now: 

  • LAS VEGAS POLICE: ‘VERY STRANGE SIMILARITIES‘ WITH NOLA CASE

It’s always after the fact, but a CNN report stated the Department of Homeland Security warned about ‘lone wolf’ attacks last month.

“Lone offenders have historically used simple tactics, such as edged weapons, firearms, or vehicle ramming, due to their ease of access, ability to inflict mass casualties, and lack of required training,” the DHS bulletin read.

According to a federal source close to the counter-terrorism community, another intelligence briefing released last summer indicated that pre-trained al-Qaeda terrorists had entered the US through the Biden-Harris administration’s open southern border.

In a recent discussion on the Shawn Ryan Show, former CIA targeting officer Sarah Adams warned of a potentially devastating attack planned by Al-Qaeda terrorists on American soil.

Investigations into the Cybertruck bomber and New Orleans terrorist are only just beginning. More details are coming… 

*   *   *

Update (1407ET): 

Deputy Assistant Director Christopher Raia of the FBI Counterterrorism Division told reporters on Thursday afternoon that the New Orleans massacre “was an act of terrorism” (14 dead, dozens injured) and stated, “My goal is to be as forthcoming as possible with you about what we’ve uncovered so far.”

Remember, hours after the terror incident on Bourbon Street, the FBI lied to the American people: “This was not a terrorist event.” 

Sigh, FBI! Public trust continues to crumble. 

Also, the FBI announced a complete reversal from a statement on Wednseday, in which Assistant Special Agent in Charge Alethea Duncan said, “We do not believe that Jabbar was solely responsible. We are aggressively running down every lead, including those of his known associates.”

Once again, given the FBI’s ongoing trust issues, the public remains uncertain about what to believe.

Back to Raia’s press conference, he said there had not been a “definitive link” between the Bourbon Street attack and the Tesla Cybertruck explosion at Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas. 

“As you know, there’s also an FBI investigation in Las Vegas. We are following up on all potential leads and not ruling everything out. However, at this point, there is no definitive link between the attack here in New Orleans and the one in Las Vegas. And again, I’ll preface as I close, I’ll preface everything with what I started with in the beginning, which was this is very early in an investigation like this,” Raia told reporters. 

New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell said Bourbon Street will reopen this afternoon ahead of the Sugar Bowl game this evening. 

Meanwhile, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said the Bourbon Street massacre can happen anywhere, and “you have to crush” evil to protect America. 

Under the Biden-Harris regime, the Feds facilitated the greatest migrant invasion this nation has ever seen by opening the floodgates on the southern border to millions of illegal aliens, some of which were pre-trained terrorists. In other words, our own government willfully compromised national security through globalist border policies.

Raia also said Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the Bourbon Street terrorist, was “100% inspired by ISIS…” 

“So what I can tell you right now is that he was 100% inspired by ISIS. And so we’re digging — we’re digging through more of the social media, more interviews, working with some of our other partners to-to ascertain just how to ascertain a little bit more about that connection,” he noted. 

However, we must note that Jabbar and Matthew Livelsberger’s (Cybertruck suicide bomber) were both US Army veterans. 

From a ramming attack on Bourbon Street to a VBIED-like explosion at Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas, occurring on the same day just hours apart, it seems suspicious and raises concerns that there might be more incidents to come.

*   *   *

Welcome to the second day of 2025.

Federal authorities and investigative teams are probing a potential military connection between a US Army veteran who displayed an Islamic State (IS) flag and was described as “hellbent” on causing maximum damage by steering a Ford F-150 Lightning (EV) into a crowd on Bourbon Street, killing at least 15 people and injuring dozens, and another US Army veteran who drove an explosives-filled Tesla Cybertruck that detonated almost like a VBIED outside Trump’s Las Vegas hotel just hours after the Bourbon Street massacre.

Two law enforcement sources familiar with the New Orleans truck-terror-ramming attack and the Las Vegas incident told NBC News that federal investigative teams are probing a potential military connection between the two individuals involved in both attacks.

New Orleans terror suspect Shamsud-Din Jabbar, 42, who died in a subsequent close-range firefight with police after the ramming attack, was a US national and Texas resident. He worked in the US Army’s human resources and information technology departments between 2006 and 2020, including a deployment to Afghanistan in 2009. 

The suspect in the Cybertruck explosion at Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas has been identified as “Matthew Livelsberger,” according to Newsweek. 

Denver-based station ABC7 reported that Livelsberger once served at the same base as Shamsud-Din Jabbar. However, no evidence yet confirms whether they had direct links of any sort. 

However, both vehicles used in New Orleans and Las Vegas were rented from San Francisco-based Turo.

Turo wrote in a statement, “We do not believe that either renter had a criminal background that would have identified them as a security threat, and we are not currently aware of any information that indicates the two incidents are related.”

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told NBC earlier that investigators believe multiple people were involved in the Bourbon Street massacre. She said authorities believe explosive devices were made in an Airbnb rental in the New Orleans metro area.

“We know that these individuals had rented the house were using it for that purpose,” Murrill said.

Murrill also said she wanted to postpone the Sugar Bowl at the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans for another day. The football game is currently scheduled for tonight after it was postponed following the attack.

Murrill noted that “the community is safe” because of the increased law enforcement presence in the city. However, the delay of the Sugar Bowl may only suggest that something larger is unfolding. 

Here we go. 

In a recent discussion on the Shawn Ryan Show, former CIA targeting officer Sarah Adams warned of a potentially devastating attack planned by Al-Qaeda terrorists on American soil.

Finally, with just a few days left until Trump is inaugurated, we can’t help but wonder at the timing of this sudden chaos.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 17:36

Palestinian Authority Bans Al Jazeera From West Bank For ‘Stirring Strife’

0
Palestinian Authority Bans Al Jazeera From West Bank For ‘Stirring Strife’

The Palestinian Authority (PA) announced Wednesday the suspension of Al-Jazeera’s operations in the Palestinian West Bank, citing alleged violations of Palestinian laws and ‘interference’. 

The major Qatar-based outlet is accused of “manipulation, interference in internal affairs, and dissemination of misleading and incendiary reports,” according to a statement in the official Palestinian news agency WAFA.

Al Jazeera headquarters building in Doha, Qatar. Source: AJ

The broadcaster has been further blamed for “reports that were deceiving and stirring strife” in the context of the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) effort to crackdown on unauthorized armed groups.

For the past more than two weeks the PA has laid police siege to the Jenin refugee camp in an effort to root out the Jenin Brigade and associated factions. The PA has called the groups “outlaws” and “Iranian gangs” which are operating in the camp.

At least nine Palestinians have been killed as a result of the assault, including reportedly children. The PA had already banned Al Jazeera from reporting from inside Jenin amid the crisis.

Al Jazeera issued a Thursday statement saying it was “shocked by this decision” and is urging an immediate reversal of the temporary ban, for which there hasn’t been a timetable. It has confirmed its coverage has moved to Jordan.

The outlet has charged the PA with “an attempt to hide the truth about events in the occupied territories, especially what is happening in Jenin and its camps.”

Months ago Israeli commandoes raided Al Jazeera’s West Bank offices and seized equipment and ordered the bureau closed.

As early as October 2023, soon after the Oct.7 Hamas terror attacks, Israel moved to ban Al Jazeera from having offices in Tel Aviv or operating anywhere in Israel.

This came on the heels of Israeli government approving “emergency regulations” giving it the power to shut down foreign news agencies which are deemed to be acting against the “security of the state”. 

On Thursday a United Nations spokesperson urged the Palestinian Authority to reverse its decision to ban Al-Jazeera, in a rare moment.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 17:20

Guardian Angels To Return To NYC Subways After Multiple Assaults And Murders

0
Guardian Angels To Return To NYC Subways After Multiple Assaults And Murders

In 1979-1980 at the height of the decade-long stagflationary crisis wrought by Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter, New York City was reeling from a growing crime wave.  The mayor was Edward Irving Koch, a lifelong Democrat who described himself as a “liberal with sanity”.   

During that same period the federal government passed the Refugee Act, which led to the infamous Mariel Boatlift in 1980 and a surge of 125,000 Cubans into the US.  A large number of these refugees were criminals from Cuban prisons, set loose by Fidel Castro and shipped off to Florida to relieve the Cuban prison system. 

Many of these same violent criminals ended up in NYC, welcomed by the US immigration system with open arms.

City residents were hit with a crippling crime wave, then New York State and NYC passed stringent gun laws in 1980, making it nearly impossible for law abiding citizens to carry and protect themselves.  New York subways in particular were considered far too dangerous for the average person, though many were too poor to afford alternative transportation. 

The situation was so bad that muggers were even getting robbed by other muggers, yet, city officials tried to diminish the threat as a matter of people using the subways at “the wrong time of day”.  

When the Democrat controlled state government disarmed the population and then refused to provide practical protection for them, people took matters into their own hands and formed citizen security groups.  The most famous of these groups was the Guardian Angels.  The organization set out to train common New Yorkers for hand-to-hand self defense and deter violent crime, especially in the subways and in Central Park. 

The Guardian Angels operated in NY for years and proved effective in preventing crime and intervening to stop crimes in progress.  They were accused of being “vigilantes”, but because they did not carry weapons their presence was mostly tolerated by the city government.  Their operations faded by the end of the 1990s, then made a short comeback around 2020.  Founder Curtis Sliwa says that he believes the Guardian Angels are needed again in 2025. 

New Yorkers seem to agree.  One grateful New Yorker even planted a kiss on Sliwa as his red-beret-wearing crew poked around the darkest corners of Bronx and Manhattan stations looking for trouble.  “It’s good to see ya’ll back,” Bronx resident Tammy Benson, 60, told Sliwa after giving him a kiss at the 125th Street station in Harlem. “You and them need to come back. I’m grateful to see it. I feel really blessed when I see [Sliwa]. It’s been like 40 years and he’s really sweet and kind.”

Another Manhattanite, Natalie Lora, says the Angels are a welcome sight.

“We need them,” said Lora, 40. “It’s that time: We need them again. We’re happy to see them. If you’re a native New Yorker then you know.”

Today, New York is run by a more extreme breed of liberal.  They have become increasingly hostile towards the idea of citizen anti-crime efforts and “vigilantes” while violent assaults are on the rise. 

In fact, taking matters into your own hands in NYC almost guarantees prosecution even if you don’t use a weapon.  The case of Daniel Penny proved that the progressive court system is intent on pursuing jail time for anyone caught physically impeding criminal activity. 

Penny was acquitted on all charges by a jury, but the people who went after him are still in power and are still as malicious as ever.  Why do they hate people like Penny?  Because leftist governments seek to control resources, and they see security as a resource.  If people provide that resource for themselves then the population might realize that they don’t need the leftist government.

Curtis Sliwa is ready to bring back regular patrols of Guardian Angels despite likely city opposition.  Sliwa ran for Mayor of NYC in 2021 as a Republican but lost the election to Democrat Eric Adams; a decision New York voters should be ashamed of in the face of Adams’ long list of failures.  

The hostility to citizen action plays as a backdrop to some horrific criminal activity.  Right after an illegal immigrant from Guatemala named Sebastion Zapeta set a sleeping woman on fire and then fanned the flames while transit police stood by and did nothing, Governor Kathy Hochul came out on social media to reassure New Yorkers and the country that the subways were safe. 

Multiple attacks have happened since, including a man being shoved in front of an oncoming train by a 23-year-old assailant for no apparent reason. 

Not surprisingly, 27 of the top 30 most violent cities in America are run by Democrats and their weak crime policies have led to disaster.  New York is a larger symbol of a systemic problem that can only be solved two ways – Citizen intervention, or the removal of leftist politicians from office. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 14:20

“Act Of Terror”: FBI Says Bourbon Street Attacker Lone Wolf, No “Definitive Link” To Vegas Cybertruck Bomber

0
“Act Of Terror”: FBI Says Bourbon Street Attacker Lone Wolf, No “Definitive Link” To Vegas Cybertruck Bomber

Update (1407ET): 

Deputy Assistant Director Christopher Raia of the FBI Counterterrorism Division told reporters on Thursday afternoon that the New Orleans massacre “was an act of terrorism” (14 dead, dozens injured) and stated, “My goal is to be as forthcoming as possible with you about what we’ve uncovered so far.”

Remember, hours after the terror incident on Bourbon Street, the FBI lied to the American people: “This was not a terrorist event.” 

Sigh, FBI! Public trust continues to crumble. 

Also, the FBI announced a complete reversal from a statement on Wednseday, in which Assistant Special Agent in Charge Alethea Duncan said, “We do not believe that Jabbar was solely responsible. We are aggressively running down every lead, including those of his known associates.”

Once again, given the FBI’s ongoing trust issues, the public remains uncertain about what to believe.

Back to Raia’s press conference, he said there had not been a “definitive link” between the Bourbon Street attack and the Tesla Cybertruck explosion at Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas. 

“As you know, there’s also an FBI investigation in Las Vegas. We are following up on all potential leads and not ruling everything out. However, at this point, there is no definitive link between the attack here in New Orleans and the one in Las Vegas. And again, I’ll preface as I close, I’ll preface everything with what I started with in the beginning, which was this is very early in an investigation like this,” Raia told reporters. 

New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell said Bourbon Street will reopen this afternoon ahead of the Sugar Bowl game this evening. 

Meanwhile, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said the Bourbon Street massacre can happen anywhere, and “you have to crush” evil to protect America. 

Under the Biden-Harris regime, the Feds facilitated the greatest migrant invasion this nation has ever seen by opening the floodgates on the southern border to millions of illegal aliens, some of which were pre-trained terrorists. In other words, our own government willfully compromised national security through globalist border policies.

Raia also said Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the Bourbon Street terrorist, was “100% inspired by ISIS…” 

“So what I can tell you right now is that he was 100% inspired by ISIS. And so we’re digging — we’re digging through more of the social media, more interviews, working with some of our other partners to-to ascertain just how to ascertain a little bit more about that connection,” he noted. 

However, we must note that Jabbar and Matthew Livelsberger’s (Cybertruck suicide bomber) were both US Army veterans. 

From a ramming attack on Bourbon Street to a VBIED-like explosion at Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas, occurring on the same day just hours apart, it seems suspicious and raises concerns that there might be more incidents to come.

*   *   *

Welcome to the second day of 2025.

Federal authorities and investigative teams are probing a potential military connection between a US Army veteran who displayed an Islamic State (IS) flag and was described as “hellbent” on causing maximum damage by steering a Ford F-150 Lightning (EV) into a crowd on Bourbon Street, killing at least 15 people and injuring dozens, and another US Army veteran who drove an explosives-filled Tesla Cybertruck that detonated almost like a VBIED outside Trump’s Las Vegas hotel just hours after the Bourbon Street massacre.

Two law enforcement sources familiar with the New Orleans truck-terror-ramming attack and the Las Vegas incident told NBC News that federal investigative teams are probing a potential military connection between the two individuals involved in both attacks.

New Orleans terror suspect Shamsud-Din Jabbar, 42, who died in a subsequent close-range firefight with police after the ramming attack, was a US national and Texas resident. He worked in the US Army’s human resources and information technology departments between 2006 and 2020, including a deployment to Afghanistan in 2009. 

The suspect in the Cybertruck explosion at Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas has been identified as “Matthew Livelsberger,” according to Newsweek. 

Denver-based station ABC7 reported that Livelsberger once served at the same base as Shamsud-Din Jabbar. However, no evidence yet confirms whether they had direct links of any sort. 

However, both vehicles used in New Orleans and Las Vegas were rented from San Francisco-based Turo.

Turo wrote in a statement, “We do not believe that either renter had a criminal background that would have identified them as a security threat, and we are not currently aware of any information that indicates the two incidents are related.”

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told NBC earlier that investigators believe multiple people were involved in the Bourbon Street massacre. She said authorities believe explosive devices were made in an Airbnb rental in the New Orleans metro area.

“We know that these individuals had rented the house were using it for that purpose,” Murrill said.

Murrill also said she wanted to postpone the Sugar Bowl at the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans for another day. The football game is currently scheduled for tonight after it was postponed following the attack.

Murrill noted that “the community is safe” because of the increased law enforcement presence in the city. However, the delay of the Sugar Bowl may only suggest that something larger is unfolding. 

Here we go. 

In a recent discussion on the Shawn Ryan Show, former CIA targeting officer Sarah Adams warned of a potentially devastating attack planned by Al-Qaeda terrorists on American soil.

Finally, with just a few days left until Trump is inaugurated, we can’t help but wonder at the timing of this sudden chaos.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 14:07

The CFPB Wants You To Pay For Mistakes Of Others

0
The CFPB Wants You To Pay For Mistakes Of Others

Authored by Jon Decker via RealClearMarkets.com,

Imagine receiving an email from a stranger offering you one hundred thousand dollars in a week if you send them ten thousand dollars today. Most of us would immediately recognize this as a scam and avoid it. However, what if you were guaranteed to get your initial ten thousand dollars back, even if it turned out to be a fraud? It seems obvious that removing such risk would encourage people to make reckless financial decisions – to everyone except President Biden’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB.) This is evidenced by their recent lawsuit against the fintech payment service Zelle.

The CFPB is suing Zelle arguing that it should be forced to reimburse anyone who unwittingly transfers their own money to a scammer. Its actions seem all the more disingenuous given that no federal law endorsed or approved by Congress saddles fintech payment processors with such liability — but progressives have long been trying to create one.

Now with a new administration incoming, CFPB Chair Rohit Chopra and his army of bureaucrats are making a final push to circumvent Congress and enact laws themselves to burnish their resumés before Trump cleans house. If Chopra’s policies are so beneficial or popular, why can’t they receive a vote in Congress? 

What the CFPB is asking Zelle to do is akin to forcing us to reimburse others for their online gambling losses. It presents a unique moral hazard by effectively making Zelle provide ‘scam insurance’ on its peer-to-peer platform where users directly self-authorize transactions. How could such platforms possibly ensure that any and every time its customers send money to another (at their behest) it’s not a scam? The notion that people should be able to irresponsibly send money – despite receiving warnings from the app, already in place – to an unvetted dubious recipient without consequences is one of the more wrongheaded ideas to have ever been floated when it comes to regulating our banks.

If the lawsuit succeeds, the results would be cruel to Zelle users. They would inevitably be asked to either foot the bill for the mistakes of others or even face de-banking where Zelle — or similar services like Venmo — are no longer available. Accounts deemed more at-risk would bear the brunt of this. There is reason to suggest ‘de-banking’ is actually the desired goal, given Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren’s support for “postal banking, ” which would give the government more lending power at the expense of the productive private sector.

The Zelle lawsuit follows a worrisome pattern from Biden’s CFPB. Chairman Chopra also recently announced his new rule to cap overdraft fees, which would both reduce the availability of overdraft services and, more concerningly, increase the incentives for people to overdraft in the first place – a practice that prudent minds have long understood should be avoided. Taken together, the Biden administration is destabilizing parts of our financial sector in its final days, unfortunately adding to the Trump administration’s laundry list of policies that need to be cleaned up.

For Zelle’s customers, let’s hope they do so expeditiously. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 14:00

Make Lithium Great Again: Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals Whole-Body Benefits Of Supplementation

0
Make Lithium Great Again: Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals Whole-Body Benefits Of Supplementation

Lithium is best known as a medication for treating bipolar disorder, where it’s used in higher doses to stabilize mood and reduce the risk of suicide. But now, researchers are uncovering evidence that this humble mineral may offer benefits far beyond mental health – at doses much smaller than those used in traditional therapies. A 2023 study from Brock University explored these possibilities in depth.

Before we continue – yes, we sell low-dose lithium in a product called Mood from IQ Biologix. We take it. It works – really well. Whether or not you give it a try, please read on as the findings from the above study are legit, and this naturally occurring mineral can be a great alternative to prescription drugs for a variety of needs. If you’re into studies, we encourage you to read it.

Published in the peer-reviewed Current Neuropharmacology, the findings suggest lithium may play a huge role in some of the biggest health challenges of aging, including Alzheimer’s disease, osteoporosis, and type 2 diabetes.

Brain Health: Lithium’s Hidden Gift

Lithium’s connection to mental health is well established. It stabilizes mood by helping balance chemicals in the brain, like serotonin and dopamine, that influence how we feel and respond to stress.

But according to the study, even tiny doses of lithium could protect the brain in other ways. One of the most promising applications is cognitive decline, including Alzheimer’s disease.

“Li is well-known to have multiple neuroprotective effects that can be used against Alzheimer’s Disease pathology. In fact, numerous studies in patients receiving Li for bipolar disorder have reported lower rates of dementias, including AD.” –Beyond Its Psychiatric Use: The Benefits of Low-Dose Lithium Supplementation, 2023

The researchers found that lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), an enzyme linked to the buildup of harmful plaques and tangles in the brain. By reducing these toxic accumulations and boosting levels of a brain-supportive protein called BDNF, lithium may help preserve memory and cognitive function well into old age. The study also referenced ecological research showing that areas with higher levels of lithium in drinking water had lower death rates from Alzheimer’s disease [1, 2, 3]. While the exact reasons are still unclear, these findings point to lithium’s potential for maintaining brain health over time. 

What about that famously fabricated research on the Amyloid Plaque hypothesis? That focused on a narrow subpopulation of amyloid beta oligomers – while the original hypothesis itself is alive and well. Current research suggests Alzheimer’s is a combination of amyloid plaque accumulation, misfolded proteins, neuroinflammation of Microglia cells (the brain’s primary immune cells), genetic factors, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, synaptic loss, and cerebrovascular issues.

A Stronger Heart and Healthier Arteries

Lithium’s benefits don’t stop with the brain—it may also help keep your heart healthy. At low doses, the researchers found that lithium supports the heart’s ability to adapt to stress, helping it pump blood more effectively. It also protects blood vessels by reducing inflammation and preventing harmful plaque buildup, which can block circulation. However, the study highlighted an important consideration: while lithium’s short-term effects on the heart are positive, long-term use might carry risks under certain conditions. Prolonged GSK3 inhibition, for instance, could contribute to excessive heart muscle growth in specific scenarios, such as chronic stress on the heart. More research is needed to fully understand these potential effects.

Building Strong Bones and Maintaining Muscle

Aging often brings declines in bone strength and muscle mass, increasing the risk of fractures and mobility issues. The study found that lithium may counteract these changes by directly supporting bone and muscle health. In bones, the researchers showed that lithium activates pathways encouraging bone-forming cells, called osteoblasts, to work more effectively. This process increased bone density and improved fracture healing in animal models. In some cases, lithium even restored bone strength in fragile skeletons to levels seen in healthy controls.

For muscles, lithium was shown to enhance repair by promoting the fusion of muscle cells during regeneration. It also encouraged a shift toward fatigue-resistant muscle fibers, which could help preserve strength and mobility as we age, reducing the risk of falls and fractures.

Tackling Inflammation and Cellular Damage

As we get older, our bodies tend to experience more inflammation and damage from unstable molecules called free radicals. These issues, collectively referred to as oxidative stress, can lead to chronic diseases and accelerate aging. According to the study, lithium helps combat these issues in several ways. It reduces inflammation and supports a cellular “clean-up” process called autophagy, which clears out damaged proteins and debris. By enhancing these processes, lithium may help cells maintain their function and resilience over time.

Metabolism Support: Fighting Fat and Sugar Issues

Another surprising benefit of low-dose lithium is its potential role in preventing obesity and type 2 diabetes. While high doses of lithium can sometimes cause weight gain, the study found that smaller amounts may have the opposite effect. The researchers demonstrated that lithium helped convert white fat (which primarily stores energy) into beige fat, a more metabolically active type that burns calories. It also improved blood sugar control in animal studies, mimicking some of the effects of exercise. These findings suggest lithium may be a valuable tool in managing metabolic health.

“Of interest, we have recently shown, at the population level, trace levels of Li found in publicly available drinking water to be negatively associated with the prevalence of obesity and diabetes across the state of Texas.”

A New Chapter for Lithium

While the potential benefits of low-dose lithium are exciting, this is still an emerging field. Scientists, including Hamstra and her team, are working to determine the best ways to use lithium safely over the long term. What’s clear is that lithium—once seen only as a psychiatric medication—is revealing itself as a versatile and powerful mineral for overall health. From protecting the brain to strengthening the heart, bones, and muscles, this overlooked element may hold the key to staying healthier, longer. As researchers continue to explore lithium’s potential, it offers a glimpse of what the future of aging well could look like. For now, this tiny but mighty mineral is quietly making its case as a surprising ally in the quest for a healthier life.

Snag some low-dose lithium here…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 13:45

Federal Judge Rules For Pfizer In Lawsuit Over Company’s COVID-19 Vaccine

0
Federal Judge Rules For Pfizer In Lawsuit Over Company’s COVID-19 Vaccine

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit brought by Texas against Pfizer, finding that U.S. law protects Pfizer due to the emergency declared over the COVID-19 pandemic.

Several laws shield Pfizer from claims that it misrepresented the efficacy of its vaccine, U.S. District Judge Sam R. Cummings said in the Dec. 30 ruling.

“The Court finds that as a matter of law under the circumstances of this case, the Defendant is entitled to immunity under the Public Readiness and Emergency Act (PREP Act),” Cummings wrote.

He also said that both the PREP Act and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, preempt the allegations from Texas.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in 2023 brought the suit in county court, alleging Pfizer misrepresented the results of the clinical trial that tested its COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer and its partner promoted the vaccine as 95 percent effective against COVID-19 infection, but the companies relied on just two months of trial data.

“Of 17,000 placebo recipients, only 162 acquired COVID-19 during this two-month period. Based on those numbers, vaccination status had a negligible impact on whether a trial participant contracted COVID-19,” the suit stated.

“The risk of acquiring COVID-19 was so small in the first instance during this short window that Pfizer’s vaccine only fractionally improved a person’s risk of infection.”

Texas officials accused Pfizer of violating several laws, including the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, that prohibit misleading advertising.

Pfizer removed the case to federal court and said in court filings that it was protected against the suit by the PREP Act.

The act states in part that it grants immunity “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure,” with narrow exceptions, during an emergency.

The U.S. health secretary declared an emergency over COVID-19 in 2020. Immunity for vaccine makers was recently extended through 2029.

“The statute provides immunity from claims for ‘any type of loss’ related to the administration or use of Pfizer’s vaccine,” Pfizer lawyers wrote in a brief in support of the company’s motion to dismiss the case, quoting from a ruling in a separate case.

“The claims here fall squarely within this broad definition of ‘loss.’”

Texas lawyers said in response that the PREP Act does not shield Pfizer in part because Congress did not preempt state claims against drug manufacturers.

“The State’s Complaint contains well-pled factual allegations focusing on Pfizer’s gross misrepresentations to the public about specific aspects of its vaccine’s performance, and that is not preempted,” they told Cummings.

Cummings sided with Pfizer in his brief ruling, which concluded by saying the case was dismissed “for essentially the reasons argued in the Motion and Reply” from Pfizer.

Paxton’s office and Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 13:20

“Another ESG Rat Jumps Ship”: Morgan Stanley Quits Net-Zero Banking Alliance Ahead Of Trump 2.0

0
“Another ESG Rat Jumps Ship”: Morgan Stanley Quits Net-Zero Banking Alliance Ahead Of Trump 2.0

The US could be in the very early stages of recovery after a decade of toxic ESG and Net Zero initiatives, widely criticized as one of the biggest financial and ideological blunders in a generation. Wall Street firms increasingly recognize that the “woke capitalism” era in corporate America will come to an abrupt end under Trump 2.0. 

Bloomberg reports that Morgan Stanley is the latest Wall Street firm to abandon the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a group of banks worldwide that push woke climate initiatives. 

Morgan Stanley’s exit comes after Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs left NZBA early last month. 

“Another ESG rat jumps ship,” Steve Milloy, a lawyer who served under Trump 1.0, wrote on X.

According to Bloomberg, “NZBA coordinates its work with the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, which is backed by the United Nations. GFANZ said earlier this week it’s making changes that will “redouble its efforts to mobilize private capital” and support the energy transition.” 

On X, Bloomberg’s Javier Blas wrote, “Wall Street is quitting en masse the Net-Zero Banking Alliance.” 

Data from Preqin Pro shows ESG fundraising peaked in 2022 and has since plunged into the first half of 2024. Wall Street discovered that ESG and woke capitalism don’t translate into solid returns. The green bubble has popped.

In November, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and ten other states sued BlackRock, State Street Corporation, and Vanguard Group “for conspiring to artificially constrict the market for coal through anticompetitive trade practices.” 

Paxton wrote in a statement:

“Texas will not tolerate the illegal weaponization of the financial industry in service of a destructive, politicized ‘environmental’ agenda. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street formed a cartel to rig the coal market, artificially reduce the energy supply, and raise prices. Their conspiracy has harmed American energy production and hurt consumers. This is a stunning violation of State and federal law.”

After billions of dollars were poured “straight into the dumpster” of risky climate investments, as one X user explained…

We have highlighted that nuclear is the only sustainable clean energy solution.

Everything else is just a scheme to siphon taxpayer dollars.

In other words, a giant political shift is underway. So, about BlackRock’s Larry Fink… 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 12:20

Republicans Have The Slimmest House Majority Since 1931, What It Means

0
Republicans Have The Slimmest House Majority Since 1931, What It Means

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

If Republicans cannot elect a Speaker, Senator Chuck Grassley could be the next President.

The Next Speaker

If no one quickly wins the gavel, certification of President-elect Trump’s victory could be delayed. Rules then would make Senator Chuck Grassley the president.

That is possible, but highly unlikely in practice, explained below.

However, at least one Republican is a confirmed no for Johnson. A second no would do Johnson in.

How Mike Johnson Could Lose the House Speaker Vote

The Wall Street Journal reports How Mike Johnson Could Lose the House Speaker Vote.

What happens on Jan. 3, and how does the speaker vote work?

Under the Constitution, newly elected and returning House members gather in the Capitol. First they have to elect a speaker, which requires a majority of those who vote for a particular person—abstaining or voting “present” doesn’t count in the calculations. The declared candidate for Republicans, who will hold a narrow majority in the new session, is incumbent Johnson. Democrats back Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.).

If no one receives a majority of votes cast for a named candidate, more ballots will be held until someone wins a majority. When Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) ran for speaker in January 2023, he wasn’t able to secure the gavel until the early hours of the morning on Jan. 7, after four grueling days of voting and 15 ballots.

One Republican—Rep. Thomas Massie (R., Ky.)—has said he would oppose Johnson, and several others have said they are undecided. All it would take to cost Johnson the speakership is for one more House Republican to vote for a different person, assuming all Democrats oppose him. But it is unclear whether any other candidate could win a majority.

It took three weeks of failed votes for other candidates before House Republicans elected Johnson in the fall of 2023.

What happens if no speaker is quickly elected?

Without a speaker, members can’t be sworn in, and the House can’t organize itself. A law dating back to the first Congress in 1789 requires the election of the speaker to precede any other business, including the swearing in of new members, the formation of committees and the passage of any legislation. The failure to elect a speaker could also delay the certification of Trump’s Electoral College victory, which by law is scheduled for Jan. 6.

Who are the key players in the speaker vote on Jan. 3?

Trump: Trump endorsed Johnson for speaker, boosting his prospects. But the president-elect’s support isn’t a guarantee that Johnson can lock up the needed votes. Johnson has been calling skeptical Republican lawmakers, trying to tamp down their concerns about his leadership.

Massie: Massie said he respects Trump but wasn’t swayed by his endorsement of Johnson. As long as Massie is determined to vote for someone else for speaker, Johnson can afford to lose only one more vote. This math gives all other members of the Republican conference enormous leverage to make demands of Johnson in exchange for their votes.

Rep. Andy Harris (R., Md.): Harris, who chairs the conservative House Freedom Caucus, has said he is uncertain of how he will vote. Harris has concerns about government spending, and he wants Johnson to commit to structural changes, including an overhaul of the amendment process, and giving priority to internal GOP debate before bills are introduced on the floor. He told The Wall Street Journal that a “significant number” of House Freedom Caucus members are similarly unconvinced.

Rep. Chip Roy (R., Texas): Roy is a prominent member of the House Freedom Caucus, who, like Massie, endorsed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis over Trump in the 2024 GOP presidential primary. Roy helped lead opposition against a stopgap spending bill that Johnson negotiated with Democrats in December. He also opposed a slimmed-down version of the bill that included a debt-ceiling increase Trump wanted. He hasn’t said how he will vote for speaker.

Rep. Victoria Spartz (R., Ind.): Spartz has said she is undecided on whether to vote for Johnson. On Monday, she called for the next speaker to create temporary structures for the House to initiate government spending audits. Johnson said he recently spoke with her.

How could Trump’s certification on Jan. 6 as president be affected by a delay?

If no speaker is elected by Jan. 6, Congress likely won’t be able to ratify Trump’s election or the election of Vice President-elect JD Vance. If there is still no speaker, no functioning House, and no certification by Inauguration Day on Jan. 20, then the new GOP-controlled Senate’s president pro-tempore, 91-year-old Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), would become president, according to the presidential line of succession.

There is no chance of Grassley becoming president. Republicans could easily elect a caretaker Speaker long enough ratify Trump.

However, I have to ask again, what precisely is the Republican mandate, if it only takes two willing to stand up to Trump to derail legislation.

One might wonder Why Does Trump Support Johnson for Speaker of the House?

Q1 of the Day: Why does Trump like Johnson?
Q1 Answer: Trump now believes Johnson will do whatever Trump says.

Team DOGE (Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy) are willing to go along with Johnson because Trump is. Otherwise, they would both be trashing Johnson.

Johnson vs McCarthy

In practice, Mike Johnson has proven to be much worse than Kevin McCarthy. I called that in advance.

Q2 of the Day: Seriously, is there no now one better than Johnson (who would take the job)?
Q2 Answer: What’s the definition of better?

If better means someone who will suck up to Trump no matter what Trump wants, then perhaps there is no one better.

Otherwise, pull a random Republican name out of the hat and you would likely be no worse off and perhaps much better off.

And so, here we are.

It is going to be very hard to pass legislation without support from some Democrats and that alone likely means bigger budget deficits.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 01/02/2025 – 12:05