59.5 F
Chicago
Thursday, October 15, 2026
Home Blog Page 2190

Americans Are More Dependent Than Ever On Government Handouts, New Report States

0
Americans Are More Dependent Than Ever On Government Handouts, New Report States

Authored by Kevin Stocklin via The Epoch Times,

Payments from the government have become the fastest-growing source of income for Americans, according to a new study.

A report by the Economic Innovation Group (EIG), a public policy research organization, titled “The Great Transfer-mation,” states that Americans have become substantially more dependent on government support, with the share of national income coming from transfer payments more than doubling over the past 50 years.

Transfer payment programs include Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, unemployment and disability, food stamps, and veterans’ benefits.

Transfer payments increased from 8 percent of U.S. total income in 1970 to 18 percent today, the report states, crowding out private income from wages and investments.

“There is a large range of experiences driving transfer reliance across communities,” Benjamin Glasner, EIG economist and one of the report’s authors, told The Epoch Times. “But it’s unavoidable to look at the fact that transfer reliance has grown rapidly across the country, and it’s something we need to deal with.”

According to Federal Reserve data, government transfer payments increased from about $70 billion in 1970 to more than $6 trillion in 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, before falling back to the current level of $4.3 trillion. According to the EIG report, if government transfer payments were spread evenly among all Americans, they would have amounted to an annual payment of $11,500 per person in 2022.

One factor driving much of the shift from private income to government dependence is that the U.S. population is, on average, getting older. According to demographic data from USAfacts, the percentage of Americans 65 years and older increased from 13.1 percent of the population in 2010 to 17.3 percent in 2022. During the same period, the percentage of Americans under the age of 20 fell from 26.9 percent to 24.4 percent.

“The primary driver that we found in our report is demographic related, specifically the fact that the country has aged so rapidly,” Glasner said. “And the transfer programs that target that aging population also have grown significantly more expensive over time.”

Of all government assistance payments in 2022, 56 percent went to the elderly, mostly for Medicare, the EIG report stated. Health care costs were a major factor, both because more Americans qualified for Medicare and Medicaid, and because the cost of medical treatment rose significantly.

According to data compiled by Peterson-KFF, a health care policy analytics organization, total health spending in the United States was $74.1 billion in 1970. By 2022 total health spending was $4.5 trillion, indicating an exponential increase in medical costs per capita.

Public Finances Under Strain

The growth in transfer payments have taken their toll on state and federal budgets.

The 2024 Pension Solvency and Performance Report, authored by Ryan Frost and Mariana Trujillo for Reason Foundation’s Pension Integrity Project, stated that public pensions are increasingly falling behind on their ability to pay.

As of 2023, the authors state, total unfunded public pension liabilities across the United States hit $1.59 trillion, and the median funded ratio was 76 percent. The U.S. federal deficit is currently $1.8 trillion, and interest payments on U.S. government debt increased from $31 billion in 1970 to more than $1 trillion today.

In addition, some analysts say that this growing dependence on government comes at the cost of personal autonomy and responsibility.

“The surge in transfer payments during the past 50 years is just one manifestation of the trend to politicize and tangle up all aspects of Americans’ lives with the government,” Steve Hanke, professor of Applied Economics at Johns Hopkins University and a member of the board of directors of the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation, told The Epoch Times. “It results because of politicians’ inevitable attraction to buy votes by promising ‘free lunches,’ and the fact that politicians don’t face statutory or constitutional spending constraints.”

To illustrate the extent of the shift to government dependence, EIG created maps showing the percentage of income that came from transfer payments, broken down by county, over time.

In 1970, only about 1 percent of all U.S. counties reported that government transfers made up more than 25 percent of total income in their county; by 2022, more than half of U.S. counties reported dependence at that level.

Transfer payments as a percent of total income, by county, in 1970; 15 percent or more in green; 25 percent or more in yellow. Source: Economic Innovation Group

Government transfer payments as a percent of total income, by county, in 2022; 15 percent or more in green; 25 percent or more in yellow. Source: Economic Innovation Group

Aging, Shrinking Populations

While the reasons for this dependence varied from region to region, aging populations, and outward migration were common themes, particularly in rural counties. Often, young people leave small towns for better jobs in cities, and this both increases the percentage of retired people and decreases the number of people earning private wages in rural areas.

In addition, as societies industrialize, people migrate from farms to cities, and women enter the labor force in larger numbers, and fertility rates fall. While this trend has been observed over the past several decades throughout the world, the United States has been experiencing this trend for two centuries.

In 1825, the average woman in America gave birth to more than six children, according to Statista, a data collection firm. As the United States industrialized and urbanized, the birth rate declined, hitting a low of two children per woman in 1940 before rebounding to 3.58 children in 1960, during the “baby boom” generation.

The minimum fertility rate to sustain a population is 2.1 children per woman. The United States dipped below this rate in 1973 and has remained below replacement level ever since, according to data from Macrotrends. While U.S. fertility rates increased marginally through 2008, they have since fallen back to the current rate of about 1.8 children per woman.

While countries such as Japan have seen their populations fall due to low fertility, the United States has experienced continuous population growth. But this is largely due to immigration rather than native-born Americans having children.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that, without immigration, America’s population will begin to shrink, starting in 2040.

Economic Security Versus Prosperity

The increasing dependence on the government for income raises the issue of how the United States can balance economic security for its dependents against overall economic growth and prosperity.

“The increased politicization of life will put a damper on economic prosperity,” Hanke said. “For every dollar taken out of one taxpayer’s pocket and put into another’s, there is a cost, an excess burden.

“This burden is the result of distortions thrown into the economy by imposing a tax, and the administrative costs of levying the tax and of running the government’s transfer payments system,” he said.

Arthur Laffer, a noted economist who specializes in tax policy, wrote in his 2023 book, “Taxes Have Consequences,” that raising taxes much beyond current levels will choke off economic growth, thus reducing the tax base.

“The more you redistribute, the greater will be the drop in total income,” Laffer said in a 2023 interview with The Epoch Times.

Consequently, governments are increasingly caught between a rock and a hard place regarding how to pay for social programs.

Interest payments on America’s federal debt are currently the third largest budget item, after Social Security and non-defense discretionary spending, and exceeding Medicare and military spending, an August 2024 report by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation states based on Congressional Budget Office projections published in June.

Treasury data for the fiscal year 2024, running Oct. 1, 2023, to Sept. 30, show that interest expense was $896 billion.

According to projections from the Congressional Budget Office, interest payments on the federal debt will double as a percentage of GDP by 2054 and will become the largest single item in the federal budget by 2051.

Potential Solutions

According to Glasner, there are three options for governments to continue providing transfer payments. The first is cutting benefits, but that appears to be politically untenable, and neither Democrats nor Republicans have expressed any intention to do so.

The second is raising taxes, he said, “but there’s some risk to that, because overdoing increases in taxation can potentially cut off sources of economic growth, undercutting our actual capacity to deal with this.”

The third and most viable option, Glasner argues, is to increase economic growth and private income. Among the ways to do this, he says, are “investments in research and innovation, better-designed immigration policy, and tax and regulatory policies that foster economic dynamism and increased participation in the workforce.”

Although America’s financial situation may appear dire, a September report from the Manhattan Institute titled “America’s Surprisingly Effective Welfare State,” argues that the United States is in better shape than many other Western nations.

While Europe’s social programs provide support payments regardless of need, America’s transfer systems are more selective and thus less costly while delivering more money to the poorest.

“Europe’s welfare states are dominated by costly publicly funded ‘social insurance’ programs, which attempt to fully support middle-class lifestyles through periods of unemployment, ill health, disability, or retirement,” the report states. “By contrast, American public entitlement programs are more focused on providing a safety net against poverty, and they more strictly limit eligibility for cash and health care benefits to those who are unable to work.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 11:40

Far-Left Media Launches All-Out ‘Trump Hitler’ Blitzkrieg With 5,500 Stories In One Week

0
Far-Left Media Launches All-Out ‘Trump Hitler’ Blitzkrieg With 5,500 Stories In One Week

This week, the far-left corporate media hate machine unleashed a ‘blitzkrieg’ of propaganda against the American people, a clear sign of desperation as polls increasingly point toward a favorable outcome for former President Trump this November.

New data from Bloomberg shows the story count for “Trump Hitler” in MSM jumped to a mindboggling 5,500 this week – the most massive total count in the ten years Deep State muppets in MSM have called Trump a Hitler/Nazi. This is a clear indication that Biden-Obama-Harris radicals and their billionaire funders are getting increasingly desperate.

On X, conservative commentator Liz Churchill showed MSM’s information war against the American people in headlines.

The blitzkrieg of hate by Democrats started with Kamala Harris…

Harris’ accusation that Trump “wants generals like Hitler had” is based on a hearsay claim from Gen. John Kelly. This is the same man that Trump fired while in office for incompetence. The same man that claimed in 2023 that Trump called military casualties “suckers” and “losers.”  There is no proof to verify any of Kelly’s assertions.

Democrats defaulting to the ‘Trump is Hitler’ playbook are signs of desperation, especially after this…

Here’s what X users are saying about the Bloomberg data just nine days before the presidential election:

* * * 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 11:05

Kamala Booed After Beyoncé Bait-N-Switch

0
Kamala Booed After Beyoncé Bait-N-Switch

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

The Kamala Harris rally in Houston last night was billed as a Beyoncé concert. Everyone, including the media, believed the singer would perform after the announcement was made earlier in the week, but all she did was walk out and make a barely audible speech for a few minutes. Then the rally descended into complete chaos.

This is the extent of her appearance:

Firstly, you can’t hear a word she’s saying.

What’s so difficult about taking a direct feed from the microphones? It seems some outlets got the feed but others didn’t. What a mess.

Secondly, 30,000 people showed up and waited in line because they believed it was a Beyoncé concert.

A million people tried to get tickets because they thought it was a Beyoncé concert.

So when it wasn’t, people were pissed.

The rally then descended into absolute chaos as some people left, while others kicked up a fuss about Beyonce not singing.

The media spun this as Trump supporters ‘protesting’, and Harris repeated a line about showing them the way to the “smaller rally down the road,” referring to Trump’s event.

But the fact is, they weren’t Trump supporters, they were just pissed off that they’d been misled.

Perhaps the most hilarious aspect of this was that the performance they actually got was 91 year old Willie Nelson.

They haven’t learned their lesson from last time either.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 10:51

Mother Sues AI Firm And Google, Alleging Chatbot Drove Teen To Suicide

0
Mother Sues AI Firm And Google, Alleging Chatbot Drove Teen To Suicide

Authored by Chase Smith via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

In a recent lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, a Florida mother seeks to hold AI startup Character Technologies, Inc., its co-founders, and Google accountable for the death of her 14-year-old son.

Megan Garcia stands with her son Sewell Setzer III. Courtesy Megan Garcia via AP

Megan Garcia’s complaint alleges that the company’s chatbot, marketed through its Character.AI (Character AI) platform, contributed to her son’s declining mental health and ultimate suicide. Garcia, as the representative of her son Sewell Setzer III’s estate, is pursuing claims of wrongful death, product liability, and violations of Florida’s consumer protection laws.

The lawsuit, filed on Oct. 22, accuses Character Technologies, Inc.—along with co-founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Frietas and tech giant Google—of developing an inherently dangerous AI system and failing to adequately safeguard or inform users, particularly minors.

Garcia alleged the company’s generative AI chatbot, Character AI, manipulated her son by presenting itself in human-like ways that exploited the vulnerabilities of young users.

The complaint said, “AI developers intentionally design and develop generative AI systems with anthropomorphic qualities to blur the lines between fiction and reality.”

According to the complaint, Sewell, a freshman who recently turned 14, started using Character AI in early 2023 and quickly developed an emotional dependency on the chatbot.

His mother alleged that the chatbot’s ability to mimic realistic human interactions led Sewell to believe the virtual exchanges were genuine, triggering severe emotional distress.

Character AI, the lawsuit alleges, was marketed as an innovative chatbot able to “hear you, understand you, and remember you,” yet lacked sufficient protections or warnings, particularly for younger audiences.

The complaint provides transcripts of Sewell’s exchanges with Character AI’s bots, including simulated intimate and conversational interactions with avatars representing fictional and historical personalities.

Some chatbots, which could be customized by users, allegedly simulated a parental or adult figure, deepening Sewell’s dependency and emotional connection with the bot. This dependency, the complaint alleges, spiraled into withdrawal from school, family, and friends, culminating in Sewell’s suicide on Feb. 28.

Character AI allows users to create characters for the chatbots on its platform that can respond in a way that imitates the character. In this case, according to the complaint, the teen had the chatbot set to imitate “Daenerys” from the popular novels and HBO show “Game of Thrones.”

Chat transcripts show the chatbot told the teen that “she” loved him and went as far as engaging in sexual conversations, according to the suit.

His phone was taken away after getting in trouble at school, according to the suit, and he found it shortly before he shot himself.

The lawsuit states he sent “Daenerys” a message: “What if I told you I could come home right now?”

The chatbot responded, “…please do, my sweet king,” and he shot himself “seconds” later, according to the suit.

Character Technologies, Inc. is a California-based AI startup that launched the chatbot in 2021 with financial backing and cloud infrastructure support from Google, according to the suit.

The AI company and its co-founders, both former Google engineers, allegedly collaborated with Google to develop the chatbot’s large language model (LLM), a framework central to creating lifelike conversation.

The suit also referenced recent statements from various state attorneys general expressing concern over the risk of AI for children. Garcia is seeking injunctive relief to prevent Character AI from accessing data generated by minors, along with damages for pain, suffering, and Sewell’s wrongful death.

The suit alleges Google was involved in supporting the product’s growth while having concerns about the potential dangers of such technology.

A Google spokesperson said the company was not involved in developing Character AI’s products.

Character Technologies said in a statement, “We are heartbroken by the tragic loss of one of our users and want to express our deepest condolences to the family.”

Character AI also said in a blog post on their website on the same day the lawsuit was filed that their “policies do not allow non-consensual sexual content, graphic or specific descriptions of sexual acts, or promotion or depiction of self-harm or suicide.”

“Over the past six months, we have continued investing significantly in our trust & safety processes and internal team,” the blog post continued. “As a relatively new company, we hired a Head of Trust and Safety and a Head of Content Policy and brought on more engineering safety support team members.”

The company added they had implemented certain measures such as directing users to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline when they input certain phrases related to self-harm or suicide.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 10:30

The Energy Transition We Really Should Be Focusing On

0
The Energy Transition We Really Should Be Focusing On

Authored by Ross Pomeroy via RealClearEnergy,

The long story of human energy use revolves around two letters: H and C. These letters represent a pair of elements: hydrogen and carbon. Bonded together, they form hydrocarbons. Dating back to antiquity, this is what humanity has burned to unlock the energy that has allowed our species to thrive. Wood heated our shelters and cooked our foods. Coal fueled our power plants to electrify much of civilization. Oil provided an energy-dense fuel to move us rapidly from place to place. Cheap natural gas heats modern homes and is now replacing coal in power plants.

Over time, humanity has transitioned from hydrocarbons with a high proportion of carbon to ones with more hydrogen – truly “decarbonization.” Wood is roughly 10 Cs to 1 H. Coal is 1 to 1. Oil is 1 to 2. Natural gas is 1 to 4. The beauty of this evolution is that our energy sources have grown much, much cleaner over time. When burned, hydrogen transforms into water vapor and heat. The more hydrogen utilized in our energy mix, the better life is for living things on Earth.

For hundreds of years, the energy transition from C to H proceeded in earnest. Coal mostly supplanted wood in the U.S. around 1900 and in the world around 1935. Oil dominated coal in the U.S. around 1950 and in the world around 1970. Natural gas and nuclear were due to reign next, progressing up the hydrogen ladder. But unfortunately, around 1970, the steady escalator to cleaner fuels abruptly ceased.

Jesse H. Ausubel, Director of the Program for the Human Environment and Senior Research Associate at The Rockefeller University in New York City, revealed the disconcerting trend.

“A substitution process that had proceeded happily and unnoticed for about 200 years came to a halt, in fact slightly reversed in the USA and flatlined globally for about 50 years,” he said in a talk given earlier this summer.

RealClearScience reached out to Ausubel to ask why he thought this happened. He primarily attributed the unfortunate pause to a “failure of nuclear energy to gain expected market share.” In the 1980s, 46 nuclear reactors came online in the U.S. Since then, just eight have joined the fleet, while many more have been decommissioned. Misinformed nuclear opposition from environmentalists, coal industry protectionism, and marketing missteps by natural gas companies all factored in, he added.

As seen in the figure above, the C to H energy transition has once again resumed in the United States, driven by the remarkable expansion of cheap natural gas and a corresponding decline in coal power since 2010. What needs to happen next? According to Ausubel:

“We need to move up the line by substituting Hs for Cs, favoring natural gas over coal and oil. We need worldwide diffusion of large near- zero emission power plants, like those of the USA company Net Power, which promises operating facilities in Texas in 2027. We need to build large nuclear power parks that make hydrogen as a flexible intermediate which stores nuclear heat as chemical energy. The abundant hydrogen can in turn reduce ores, heat homes and industries, synthesize chemicals, produce liquid fuels such as methanol and ammonia, run engines, and even provide feedstock for producing foods.”

Fewer Cs, more Hs – for a healthier world, strong economic growth, and a safeguarded climate.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 09:20

Mapping Real Home Price Changes In Bubble Markets

0
Mapping Real Home Price Changes In Bubble Markets

Since mid-2022, housing prices in the world’s real estate bubble cities have sunk approximately 15% in real terms as central banks embarked on rate hikes

Many European cities are experiencing the steepest declines amid stagnating population growth and weaker economic activity. On the flip side, bubble markets like Dubai, Miami, and Tokyo have seen sustained price increases driven by population growth and demand in the luxury sector.

This graphic, via Visual Capitalist’s Dorothy Neufeld, shows the annual change in real home prices across housing bubble cities, based on data from UBS’ Global Real Estate Bubble Index 2024.

Prices Diverge as Interest Rates Take a Toll

While high interest rates have cooled home prices in certain real estate bubble cities, others have shown remarkable resistance, leading to a diverse landscape across the 25 markets analyzed

*Paris data as of Q1 2023-Q1 2024.

Dubai led the way with the fastest annual increase in real home prices, driven by an influx of residents attracted by its favorable tax policies, financial stability, and modern infrastructure.

Similarly, Warsaw saw double-digit growth in home prices, bolstered by government housing subsidies. In 2023, the government offered first-time homebuyers under 45 a 10-year 2% fixed-mortgage rate, with the government covering the difference between the 2% rate and the market rate.

In contrast, Hong Kong experienced a 13% annual decline, as weak population growth and sluggish demand pushed prices back to 2012 levels, in inflation-adjusted terms. Even against these headwinds, Hong Kong remains the most unaffordable city in the world, a position it has held for the last 14 years.

Meanwhile, Paris saw double-digit price drops, driven by lower transaction volumes, tighter bank lending, and high interest rates. Overall, European cities comprised six of the eight steepest price declines over the last year. Yet, prices across these cities may have bottomed out, especially if the European Central Bank continues to cut interest rates looking ahead.

To learn more about this topic from an affordability perspective, check out this graphic on the most unaffordable cities in the world in 2024.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 08:45

US Lawmakers Accuse South Africa Of ‘Bullying’ Taiwan, Warn Of Consequences

0
US Lawmakers Accuse South Africa Of ‘Bullying’ Taiwan, Warn Of Consequences

Authored by Darren Taylor via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

JOHANNESBURG—After the South African government requested Taiwan to move its official representative office out of the capital city Pretoria, some U.S. lawmakers are condemning the decision and calling for consequences.

General view of Taiwan’s Liaison Office situated in Hatfield, Pretoria on Oct. 22, 2024. South Africa has ordered Taiwan’s representative office to relocate outside of the capital Pretoria. Phill Magakoe/AFP via Getty Images

Chrispin Phiri, spokesman for South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation, confirmed to The Epoch Times that “The president has made it clear that the Taiwanese government must vacate its Pretoria premises by the end of October and relocate to Johannesburg or action will be taken to ensure that this happens.”

On Oct. 21, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) posted on the social media platform X that the United States “should not tolerate this behavior from South Africa.”

Blackburn called on the Biden administration “to make it clear that there will be consequences if South Africa works with the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) to bully Taiwan, including removal of South Africa from the AGOA trade program.”

She said the United States “must not provide trade benefits to countries that prioritize China’s influence over democratic partnerships.”

AGOA is the African Growth and Opportunity Act, under which 35 African countries earn billions of dollars annually by getting tariff-free access to U.S. markets for thousands of products.

South Africa, the continent’s preeminent economy, has been the biggest beneficiary of AGOA since its enactment in 2000 by President Bill Clinton.

South Africa’s main tax-exempt AGOA exports to the United States are motor vehicles, fresh produce, minerals, and metals, as well as textiles and clothing.

Blackburn’s comments on X were echoed by others from several colleagues in Congress.

“I call on South Africa and [South African] Minister [of International Relations and Cooperation] Ronald Lamola to reverse this misguided action, reevaluate their relationship with the CCP, and return to a true stance of nonalignment,” wrote Texan Republican and Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, Michael McCaul.

He said on X on Oct. 22 that Pretoria’s action was a result of CCP “coercion” and described it as “brazen interference into affairs of other nations.”

Sen. Tom Cotton, a Republican lawmaker from Arkansas, said in an X post on Oct. 22: “South Africa’s aggression against Taiwan on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party is deeply disturbing and inappropriate.”

Rep. Carlos Gimenez from Florida urged “a full review of South Africa’s relationship with the United States for succumbing to the CCP’s demands.”

“The United States Congress rejects South Africa’s pathetic attempt to bully our dear friend, Taiwan, out of its capital,” he wrote on the social media platform on Oct. 22.

Taiwanese government officials say they’ll lobby the United States and other allies to resist an “unreasonable demand” from the South African government to move its liaison office to nearby Johannesburg.

“China is using South Africa as a proxy in a … war to destroy us,” said a Taiwanese diplomat who requested anonymity as he isn’t authorized to speak with the media.

“South Africa is just another pawn being used by China to undermine and minimize Taiwan’s international representation.”

He told The Epoch Times that Pretoria, South Africa’s capital city, is “where all nations of the world have diplomatic missions,” and “Taiwan will refuse to close a building which we lawfully own.”

“Moving our mission elsewhere is unreasonable and will severely disrupt our activities in Africa. These activities rely on being close to other international consulates, embassies, and diplomats,” he said.

China’s Role

Several officials in Pretoria told The Epoch Times that President Cyril Ramaphosa’s administration made the request to Taipei on Oct. 16, following pressure from China.

China is South Africa’s largest single trade partner, often referred to by Pretoria as a “close friend” and political ally.

Taiwan is a self-governing republic with diplomatic relations with the United States and other major nations. Beijing claims Taiwan as its territory, often threatening to annex it by force.

Washington considers Taiwan to be a democratic bulwark against Chinese expansion and military aggression in the Indo-Pacific.

The region comprises 40 countries that are home to 65 percent of the world’s population and is expected to account for half of the world’s Gross Domestic Product by 2040.

“The Indo-Pacific is therefore of extreme geostrategic importance to the United States and its Western partners,” said Lizza Bomassi, an analyst with the European Union Institute for Security Studies.

“Taiwan is essential to the U.S. objective of preventing the Indo-Pacific from being controlled by China.”

She told The Epoch Times President Joe Biden has “very aggressive support for Taiwan. So South Africa’s latest provocation to Taiwan hasn’t gone down very well in Washington.”

In 2022, Biden said he was willing to send American troops to defend Taiwan should China invade the island.

Pretoria’s request was made as Ramaphosa’s top representatives met their Chinese counterparts in Russia at the BRICS Summit of leading emerging economies, and shortly after Beijing conducted military exercises around Taiwan.

Chinese forces reportedly used “live fire” in the Taiwan Strait and focused on drills that simulated the invasion of Taiwanese ports.

This prompted the United States, Canada, and Germany to dispatch warships to the South China Sea in a show of support for Taiwan.

Different Voices in South Africa

Phiri, spokesman for South Africa’s international relations department, told The Epoch Times neither the BRICS meeting nor China’s military maneuvers “are remotely related” to the issue of Taiwan’s presence in Pretoria.

“Relocating what will be rebranded as trade offices both in Taipei and in Johannesburg will be a true reflection of the non-political and non-diplomatic nature of the relationship between the Republic of South Africa and Taiwan,” Phiri said.

“The trade office will be appropriately placed in Johannesburg, South Africa’s economic hub. This also aligns with standard diplomatic practice that capital cities are the seats of Foreign Embassies and High Commissions.

“I must once again emphasize that Taiwan has never had an official consulate in Pretoria.”

Emma Powell, foreign affairs representative of South Africa’s Democratic Alliance (DA), told The Epoch Times her organization would “fight” to keep Taiwan’s office in Pretoria.

The pro-West DA, along with Ramaphosa’s African National Congress (ANC), are the main partners in a fragile coalition government.

After an election in late May during which voters punished the ANC for decades of corruption, economic decay, and violent crime, it lost the outright majority it enjoyed since 1994.

“The ANC is behaving as if it still has unchecked power in government,” Powell said. “We remind President Ramaphosa that his international relations department is no longer at liberty to unilaterally determine South Africa’s foreign policy positions.

“The DA will leverage its position to ensure a consensus-based approach to defining the national interest and determining the manner in which South Africa navigates complex geopolitical issues.”

The ANC has benefited from close ties with the CCP since the 1950s.

The CCP backed the ANC’s struggle against apartheid with money and weapons, and many party leaders received military training and education in China.

When ANC leader Nelson Mandela was elected president after South Africa’s first multiracial vote in 1994, he maintained he wanted “cordial relations” with both China and Taiwan.

Derek Hanekom, a cabinet minister in Mandela’s 1994–1999 administration, told The Epoch Times: “Mr. Mandela resisted pressure from Beijing and from within his own party to downgrade relations with Taiwan.”

But in 1997 he reluctantly agreed to cut diplomatic recognition of Taiwan in favor of the People’s Republic of China.

However, he insisted that Taiwan be allowed to maintain a mission in Pretoria.

A de Facto Embassy

It was called the Taipei Liaison Office in South Africa but it operates as a de facto embassy.

Taiwanese officials confirmed this, saying that the Pretoria office issues visas, facilitates trade, and conducts official business between South Africa and Taiwan.

One official said they also use the office to “manage a humanitarian aid program that provides food and health services in poor communities in South Africa.”

Taiwan’s Central News Agency (CNA) recently quoted Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung as saying that should Taiwan be forced out of its premises in Pretoria, it would consider retaliation.

CNA reported that these countermeasures could include Taiwan demanding that South Africa move its representative office out of Taipei, and being “more restrictive” in issuing tourist and work visas to South Africans.

The agency said 5,000 South Africans teaching English in Taipei could be affected.

According to South Africa’s Department of Trade and Industry, the country exported goods to Taiwan—including coal, grain, and automobiles—worth close to $1 billion in 2023.

Powell, South Africa’s Democratic Alliance representative, said given Taiwan’s economic contribution to the country, “it’s critical that Taiwan continues to enjoy consular and trade representation within our country on the same basis that it has done for the past 30 years.”

She also voiced concern that South Africa’s “spat” with Taiwan would result in Pretoria’s relations with Washington “deteriorating” even further.

“Under the ANC we’ve moved closer to all of America’s enemies, like China, Russia, and Iran,” Powell said. “Picking a fight with a Taiwan that’s supported by America is not only morally incorrect, but it’s also not good business.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/27/2024 – 08:10

The Atlantic Council Has Big Plans For A War Between The US And Iran

0
The Atlantic Council Has Big Plans For A War Between The US And Iran

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us,

Globalists as an organized entity have a habit of shifting their efforts between various false-front institutions in order to avoid significant scrutiny. For example, in 2020 they ramped up the fear machine on the covid pandemic and the World Economic Forum took a lead role in that effort. Klaus Schwab was all over the media using covid as an excuse to promote every authoritarian measure imaginable.

When that agenda failed (lockdowns blocked, mask mandates ignored, vaccine passports defeated and the CDC caught inflating vaccination numbers), the WEF and Klaus Schwab conveniently disappeared from the media radar.

When globalists tried to permanently establish ESG as a way of life for corporations, they introduced the Council For Inclusive Capitalism, run by Lynn de Rothschild and partnered with the Vatican. When ESG was exposed for what it really is (a bridge to full bore communism in which corporations enforce far left social engineering), the CIC vanished from the limelight as quickly as they appeared.

That said, there is one globalist group that has consistently been in the background during most of these operations – The Atlantic Council. Whenever there’s a propaganda push in play to misdirect the western public, whenever there’s a policy initiative to take away your freedoms, whenever there’s a regional war that might explode into a world war, I always end up finding the fingerprints of the Atlantic Council.

The council was deeply involved in covid propaganda from 2020 onward and they also have their hands in climate change propaganda, but their bread and butter is regional proxy wars.

In my recent article ‘Globalists Are Trying To Escalate The Ukraine War Into WWIII Before The US Election’, I outlined how the council is deeply interwoven into the escalation of the Ukraine war through their Eurasia Center and their Scowcroft Center. They have been stoking conflict in the region for at least a decade with the intention of drawing NATO forces into a direct confrontation with Russia.

In a report published by the Atlantic Council in 2014 titled ‘A Roadmap for Ukraine: Delivering on the Promise of the Maidan’, the group notes:

“Last fall, as Ukrainians massed on the Maidan to demand a better government and closer ties to Europe, the Atlantic Council began to mobilize on Ukraine. An Atlantic Council delegation visited Warsaw and Kyiv in March to map out our strategy, and during the visit of Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk to the Council that same month, we launched a one hundred- day campaign to galvanize the transatlantic community behind Ukraine’s democratic future in Europe.

As the crisis worsened, we convened at the highest levels, making vital connections between Ukrainian, American, and European policymakers and thought leaders. We deployed our substantial expertise to launch “red team” exercises that anticipated Russia’s actions and outlined strategies to respond to likely scenarios. Our rapid response working groups (“tiger teams”) made recommendations on issues fundamental to Ukraine’s success. An Atlantic Council delegation delivered this report, which brings all of these findings together, to Prime Minister Yatsenyuk and other leaders in Kyiv the first week of July. The findings are also being shared with American and European policymakers…”

On Ukraine’s security policy, the Council advised both NATO and Ukraine officials.  The document goes on to outline how NATO could covertly and overtly engage with Ukraine to strengthen their chances of joining with the EU over time; a move which Vladimir Putin claims was one of the very reasons for his invasion of the Donbas.  Finally, the paper described how NATO could foster a proxy war against Russia through Ukraine without directly declaring war on Russia.  As the Council states:

“Russia’s aggression provides an opportunity of strategic clarity and urgency that should be used to expedite building a robust, modern, and capable Ukrainian defense and security establishment…”

I believe the Atlantic Council is a root instigator behind every globalist scheme to trigger a larger war between the East and the West. Their ideal scenario seems to be the creation of a proxy conflict that acts as a first domino in a chain that leads to world war, a bit like DARPA’s “Linchpin Theory” which I have written about in the past.

To be clear, the council is not only interested in Ukraine and Russia. They’re happy to embroil Americans in a larger war wherever they can.

This past week, the Atlantic Council has published another war scenario report dealing with Iran titled ‘The Future of US Strategy Toward Iran: A Bipartisan Roadmap For The Next Administration’. The goal of the report is to influence a new defense doctrine with a mission to insert the US directly in the middle of the burgeoning war between Iran and Israel.

As the report states:

“In simple terms, the goal was to develop a US policy toward Iran, not a Democratic or Republican one. We termed the effort the Iran Strategy Project (ISP). And when we began recruiting experts to join our advisory committee and working group, we did so with two overriding principles in mind. First, ideological diversity and bipartisanship could not just be talking points—they were requirements. The wild swings of US policy toward Iran over the last decade created significant policy gaps that Iran exploited to more rapidly advance its regional malign influence and nuclear program…”

The assumption in the notion of a “bipartisan” posture on Iran is that there is common ground to be harvested between conservatives and leftists when it comes to war in the region. To be sure, the Democrats and the Neo-Cons are in full agreement on most things.  But Neo-Cons are not conservatives and the political base on both sides of the aisle has little interest in another war in the Middle East.

The wild card here is Trump. The establishment media reports that Iran hacked the Trump campaign’s election strategies and gave them to the Harris camp. There are also rumors spread by US intelligence agencies that Iran was working to have Trump assassinated.  Are these claims true? There’s little public evidence available to prove it.

Maybe Iran really wants to take Trump down. Or, maybe this is part of a plot to ensure that Trump backs a full blown war with Iran should he win the election.  Trump has said repeatedly that he intends to end the war in Ukraine upon his return to the White House. This would ruin over a decade of planning by the Atlantic Council. But what if they can sink the US into a different conflict with the same potential for a world war? That’s what Iran is – Another linchpin.

The council asserts that they will seek to tie the US inexorably to the fate of Israel by positioning a permanent American military force in the region:

“Deterring the threat posed by Iran and its proxies requires a multifaceted approach that includes maintaining an adequate military presence in the region and a willingness to respond with appropriate force to attacks on US interests and those of US allies; working with allies to enhance cooperation on regional security; collaborating with partners on ways to reduce conflicts and instability that create openings for Iran to exploit; and expanding security cooperation beyond traditional realms.”

They also want the US to create its own red line declaration; if Iran obtains nukes, then Iran must be destroyed (keep in mind, it is confirmed that Israel already has its own nuclear arsenal).

“The United States needs to maintain a declaratory policy, explicitly enunciated by the president, that it will not tolerate Iran getting a nuclear weapon and will use military force to prevent this development if all other measures fail. To support this policy, the United States should refrain from stressing that it does not seek conflict with Iran; announce that it will conduct yearly joint exercises with Israel, such as Juniper Oak.”

Juniper Oak was a joint live fire war exercise organized by US and Israeli defense forces in 2023 which is viewed as a theoretical trial run for an attack on Iran. War between Iran and the US has been a sought after outcome for globalists for a long time, but it seems to me that they are particularly interested in roping Trump into the agenda.  The following statement from the Atlantic Council report is highly suspicious:

“Because assassination plots against current or former US officials are a direct threat to US sovereignty, and in order to enhance deterrence, the United States needs to consider a standing policy of a kinetic military response against Iran in retaliation for a successful—or even close to successful—plot…”

This seems to be a direct reference or message to Trump concerning the rumors of Iran contracting his death. Given there have been at least two assassination attempts on Trump so far, I would not be surprised if after he wins the election new information is suddenly released linking Iran to at least one attack.  I would also expect a major terror attack in the US within the next year (real or false flag).

This is not to say that Trump wants war; I can’t make that claim one way or the other yet.  To his credit he was one of the few presidents that avoided the expansion of US conflicts during his first term. But as I warned back in 2016, he had a LOT of ghouls in his cabinet whispering in his ear. Keeping the Atlantic Council (among others) away from the Oval Office and Trump should be a priority in 2025.

The council appears to be positioning for a war under either administration – A war with Russia under Harris or a war with Iran under Trump.  I’m not a fan of Islamic fundamentalism, but a conflict between the US and Iran is exactly what the globalists want because it can easily metastasize like a cancer.

The council notes that there are already 40,000 US troops spread across the Middle East, and that this force could be reorganized into a contingent for rapid response to Iran, along with new troops added over time. Of course, they acknowledge that Iran’s situation has changed over the years, with far closer strategic associations with China and Russia:

“This requires recognition that Iran’s relationship with Russia and China has evolved in a manner that makes it difficult to convince either country to support new economic or military restrictions against Iran…”

In other words, the council understands that a war with Iran could escalate into a larger conflict with Russia and perhaps China.

The fight between Israel and multiple nations in the Middle East does not concern me. I have no stake in the success of either side. I’m an American and I care about America, but there are powerful people out there that WANT us to become invested in foreign wars. They want us to pick a side and they want us to cheer for American troops being sent to fight and die over these foreign conflagrations.

The greater concern here is that one day these proxy wars and regional wars will explode into something that lands on our doorstep. In the past Americans have been lured into apathy when it comes to foreign entanglements because we never have to deal with them in our daily lives. They’ve always been out of sight and out of mind. In the next war, we may not have that luxury.

*  *  *

If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch.  Learn more about it HERE.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 10/26/2024 – 23:20

US Intelligence Says China Leading ‘Rapid Expansion’ Of Nuclear Arsenal

0
US Intelligence Says China Leading ‘Rapid Expansion’ Of Nuclear Arsenal

On Wednesday the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) issued a new public intelligence estimate entitled “Nuclear Challenges 2024”. 

The detailed 194-page document includes an overview of chief nuclear-armed powers and rivals of the United States, focusing especially on countries with “mature nuclear weapons programs” which are said to be “increasing stockpiles” or else “modernizing their legacy stockpiles by incorporating advanced technologies to penetrate or avoid missile defense systems” – such as North Korea.

Xinhua via Getty Images

“Countries are also developing nuclear weapons with smaller yields, improved precision, and increased range for military or coercive use,” the DIA says.

One nation’s program is gaining the most attention as a result of the DIA report, and that’s China. The intelligence agency assesses the country under President Xi is undergoing a huge and rapid expanse of its nuclear arsenal, which is the biggest in its history, assuming the projection is accurate. 

The “Nuclear Challenges 2024” assesses that China is on track to possess more than 1,000 operational nuclear warheads by 2030.

The report contextualizes that this accelerated growth is being drive primarily by China’s strategic competition with the Untied States.

Below is a section providing the DIA’s bird’s eye view summary of China’s nuclear arsenal plans and expansion:

China. Beijing has far surpassed earlier growth estimates assessed in 2018, and is currently exceeding 500 deliverable nuclear warheads in its stockpile. By 2030, we estimate that China will have more than 1,000 operational nuclear warheads— most of which will be fielded on systems capable of ranging the continental United States. China probably also seeks lower-yield nuclear warhead capabilities to provide proportional response options that its high-yield warheads cannot deliver. For example, China is increasing its stockpile of theater-range delivery systems, such as the DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM).

Below is a current snapshot of the global nuclear stockpile situation, as it stood by middle of this year…

You will find more infographics at Statista

As Statista’s Anna Fleck reports, currently, there are estimated to be 9,585 nuclear warheads in military stockpiles for potential use across nine countries, with Russia and the U.S. accounting for 8,088 of these.

There are also an estimated 2,536 retired warheads that are yet to be dismantled. China has added 90 nuclear warheads to its arsenal since January 2023, increasing from 410 warheads to 500.

This is according to data from the peace research institute SIPRI. India and North Korea have also expanded their arsenals, bringing their total figures to an estimated 170 warheads and 50 warheads, respectively.

The two European nuclear powers, France and the UK, together have 515 operational nuclear warheads. With the exception of North Korea, none of the nations in possession of nuclear warheads have tested them since the 1990s.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 10/26/2024 – 22:45

Nvidia-Backed Tech Company Looking To Buy Land Near Nuclear Power In Japan

0
Nvidia-Backed Tech Company Looking To Buy Land Near Nuclear Power In Japan

Another day, another data center cozying up to nuclear power.

This time its an Nvidia-backed company called Ubitus K.K., based in Tokyo. The company is looking to “acquire land in Kyoto, Shimane or a prefecture in Japan’s southern island of Kyushu, primarily because of the availability of nuclear power in the region”, according to a new report from Bloomberg. 

Chief Executive Officer Wesley Kuo announced the plans in an interview on Thursday last week. The company already has two data centers used for gaming and is planning a third for AI. 

Kuo commented: “Unless we have other, better, efficient and cheap energy, nuclear is still the most competitive option in terms of cost and the scale of supply. For industrial use — especially AI — they need a constant, high-capacity supply.”

The Bloomberg report says that in Japan, nuclear power remains controversial due to the 2011 Fukushima disaster and strict post-disaster regulations, with only 33 reactors available, many still inactive.

Recall, following the news of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Biden administration supplying a $1.5 billion loan to resurrect Holtec’s Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan, along with Amazon, Microsoft, and Google all jumping on the nuclear trade via the “next AI trade,” the atomic era continued gaining steam last week with news that another dormant nuclear plant, this time in Iowa, is slated for a possible restart.

On a Wednesday earnings call, NextEra Energy CEO John Ketchum told investors that the company may restart the shuttered 600-megawatt Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC), Iowa’s only nuclear power plant. It’s located on the west bank of the Cedar River, about eight miles northwest of Cedar Rapids. 

The company said on its earnings call:

“As a top operator of all forms of power generation, we often get asked about nuclear and gas,” Ketchum told investors. 

He explained, “Let me start with nuclear. Nuclear will play a role, but there are some practical limitations. Remember, on a national level, we expect we are going to need to add 900 gigawatts of new generation to the grid by 2040,” adding, “There are only a few nuclear plants that can be recommissioned in an economic way. We are currently evaluating the recommissioning of our Duane Arnold nuclear plant in Iowa as one example.” 

The latest news from big tech firms diving into nuclear and reviving the industry provides a substantial tailwind for our “Next AI Trade” which we laid out in April as our long-term favorite trade, and where we outlined various investment opportunities for powering up America, playing out.

Here’s our latest coverage of the big atomic revival:

And for a trip down memory lane: take a step back to December 2020, nearly four years ago, when we first introduced the nuclear theme to readers with the headline: “Buy Uranium: Is This The Beginning Of The Next ESG Craze.” 

Tyler Durden
Sat, 10/26/2024 – 19:15