40.6 F
Chicago
Saturday, November 23, 2024
Home Blog Page 2411

Watch: Elite US Airborne Division “Practicing For War” Near Ukraine Border

0
Watch: Elite US Airborne Division “Practicing For War” Near Ukraine Border

At a moment Ukraine says that Russian forces are starting to withdraw from the key port city of Kherson, and as Ukrainian cities suffer under increased aerial attacks, the US Army is flexing its muscle with elite training exercises just a few miles from Ukraine’s border.

Near the Ukraine-Romania border, an elite airborne division is “practicing for war” – as a CBS film crew detailed days ago – and is ready to be called up at a moment’s notice

The U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division has been deployed to Europe for the first time in almost 80 years amid soaring tension between Russia and the American-led NATO military alliance. The light infantry unit, nicknamed the “Screaming Eagles,” is trained to deploy on any battlefield in the world within hours, ready to fight.

The training is described as happening just three miles away from Romania’s border with Ukraine

The timing is also hugely significant, coming at a moment the Kremlin has already for months accused Washington of using the Ukraine crisis to wage a proxy war against Russian forces.

“We’re ready to defend every inch of NATO soil,” Brigadier General John Lubas told CBS News. “We bring a unique capability, from our air assault capability… We’re a light infantry force, but again, we bring that mobility with us for our aircraft and air assaults,” he said.

War correspondent Charlie D’Agata observed in capturing the rare footage that “It’s not just about defending NATO territory,” but that “They’re fully prepared to cross over into Ukrainian territory” – he said speaking of the Army airborne forces.

It’s also significant that the Pentagon is not at all taking steps to hide the troop presence so near the active conflict zone in Ukraine; instead, in inviting a CBS crew to ride along in Black Hawk helicopters the US is openly advertising it, while no doubt delivering a strong warning message to Moscow. 

Journalist Glenn Greenwald has observed of the footage making the rounds on Sunday:

It’s always a bad sign when the US military starts embedding the largest media corporations to enable exciting war shots for the evening network news. Biden has done literally everything to make the US a belligerent in the war in Ukraine short of deploying full battalions there.

The Kremlin has long warned it is ready to attack any foreign weapons or troops which enter Ukraine. Already the Russians suspect a long-embedded US intelligence and special forces contingency helping the Ukrainians on the ground. It true, at this point it is probably a very “light” footprint, while the presence of the 101st Airborne just across the border sends a signal that things could escalate dramatically in the blink of an eye.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 15:00

California Wildfires Cancel-Out Two Decades Of Emissions Reductions

0
California Wildfires Cancel-Out Two Decades Of Emissions Reductions

Authored by John Seiler via The Epoch Times,

In 2020, greenhouse gas emission reductions by California were negated by the CO2 from wildfires.

That’s according to a new study by researchers from UCLA and the University of Chicago, Up in smoke: California’s greenhouse gas reductions could be wiped out by 2020 wildfires.”

“Wildfire emissions in 2020 essentially negate 18 years of reductions in GHG emissions from other sectors,” the study’s authors concluded.

Yet, comprehensive sensible policies could mitigate the wildfires. These policies include, especially, undergrounding power lines, which often spark onto dry wood, starting conflagrations.

According to the study, “We estimate that California’s wildfire carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions from 2020 are approximately two times higher than California’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions since 2003. Without considering future vegetation regrowth, CO2e emissions from the 2020 wildfires could be the second most important source in the state above either industry or electrical power generation.”

Their solution: “Our analysis suggests that significant societal benefits could accrue from larger investments in improved forest management and stricter controls on new development in fire-prone areas at the wildland-urban interface.” Those things would help.

But the state has lagged in dealing with its aging electricity infrastructure—a problem made worse, ironically, as more electric vehicles hit the road and need more juice from already overloaded power lines.

When I was state Sen. John Moorlach’s press secretary, 2017-20, one of his priorities was the power lines. In 2016, the year before I joined him, he sponsored Senate Bill 1463. It would have required the California Public Utilities Commission and CalFire to prioritize fire-hazard areas “associated with overhead utility facilities when determining areas which it will require enhanced mitigation measures for wildfire hazards.”

After scrupulous vetting by several committees, it passed unanimously in both houses of the Legislature. Then Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed it. Which made no sense.

In 2018, during another wildfire conflagration, the Daily Caller reported, “As California Burns, Jerry Brown Takes Heat for Vetoing 2016 Wildfire Mitigation Bill.” It quoted Moorlach, “Not addressing wildfires has reversed all the work we’ve done to reduce greenhouse gases. It’s inconsistent.”

Also in 2018, Moorlach introduced a new bill, numbered again Senate Bill 1463. It would have spent $600 million to mitigate wildfires. This time, things turned out better, as another bill, Senate Bill 901, grabbed the idea and included $200 million from cap-and-trade revenues to go toward wildfire mitigation. That bill was authored by state Sen. Bill Dodd (D-Napa), and the money at least was a start.

Flummoxed voters bounced Moorlach in 2020. That was just before the massive, unexpected surpluses of the past two years flowed into the state treasury. What an opportunity to sharply reduce greenhouse gases, not by some utopian edict of banning non-electric cars by 2035, but by actually doing something comprehensive about the spark-prone power lines.

There has been some action. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s summary of the budget enacted in June for fiscal year 2022-23 tallied, “The Budget includes $1.2 billion in additional actions to continue building forest and wildfire resilience statewide.”

Industry also is acting. According to San Diego Gas & Electric, its “Wildfire Mitigation Plan outlines a suite of programs and initiatives that the company will undertake to continue to advance wildfire safety. One of those initiatives is strategic undergrounding of overhead power lines.

“Burying power lines removes the risk of these lines sparking fires during adverse weather events, but more importantly, buried lines can remain energized during Public Safety Power Shutoffs, reducing the impact of power outages to fire prone communities.”

All that also is a start. But given the great emphasis put on reducing CO2 emissions by California politicians, and the immense cost imposed on residents here, shouldn’t this have been the top priority on spending this year’s $100 budget surplus?

According to one estimate, “At a cost of $3 million per mile, undergrounding 81,000 miles of distribution lines would cost $243 billion.” A lot of money. But, say, $50 billion could have been taken from the $100 billion surplus to underground the most vulnerable power lines.

Finally, Proposition 30 on this November’s ballot mainly is about increasing taxes on what supporters actually brand “Greedy Billionaires and CEOs.” Taxes would rise up to $4.5 billion a year to install electric vehicle chargers to benefit Lyft, the initiative’s sponsor. But as bait for voters, it also would spend 20 percent of revenues on a Wildfire Green House Gas Emissions Reduction fund. That could mean up to $900 million a year to reduce wildfires.

As with most issues—homelessness, crime, drought, tax reform, agriculture, energy—the state is taking a haphazard, piecemeal approach to fighting wildfires. The comprehensive approach the state took during its Golden Age of the 1940s-early 1970s—building the state water and schools systems, especially—is something no longer possible. Even as the state enters another season of wildfires, burning down homes and turning Californians into human S’mores.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 14:30

China Congress Ends As “Dictator For LIfe” Xi Stacks Inner Circle With Loyalists; Equity Market Implications

0
China Congress Ends As “Dictator For LIfe” Xi Stacks Inner Circle With Loyalists; Equity Market Implications

One week after it started with a historic, “resetting” speech by China’s President, on Sunday – a day after China’s top political meeting of the past five years wrapped up – Xi Jinping unveiled a new leadership team stacked with loyalists as he looks to consolidate his power in a precedent-busting third term.

One day after his predecessor Hu Jintao was unceremoniously escorted out of the 20th Party Congress for reasons still unknown, Xi walked into Beijing’s Great Hall of the People followed by members of the Communist Party’s new Politburo Standing Committee — the pinnacle of Chinese leadership — in descending ranking order.

As Nikkei reports, Shanghai party chief Li Qiang was the first member behind Xi to walk into a room packed with journalists, confirming his second-in-command rank and signaling that he will become the country’s next premier. The pair were followed by anti-corruption chief Zhao Leji, ideology tsar Wang Huning, Beijing party head Cai Qi, top Xi adviser Ding Xuexiang and Guangdong province chief Li Xi. Most have previously worked with the 69-year-old Xi over the years as he shot up the ranks of the party.

Vice Premier Hu Chunhua, a protege of former President Hu Jintao who had been seen as possible contender for premier, appeared to have been demoted after he not only failed to make Xi’s inner circle but was also excluded from the 24-member Politburo.

And for the first time in a quarter century, there will be no women in the Politburo after the retirement of its sole female member Sun Chunlan, a vice premier and China’s top pandemic handler. Surely US women’s rights group will get right on top of that boycotting Chinese goods.

The unveiling of Xi’s cabunet comes after Xi sealed up his bid for a new term at Saturday’s official close of the twice-a-decade National Congress. Analysts had predicted that Xi would surround himself with loyalists in a bid to crush the party factionalism and infighting that marked the tenures of his predecessors Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, and they were absolutely correct.

“The appointments of Xi’s associates to the highest positions of power in China indicates that Xi’s vision for China will be rigidly executed in the next decade,” said Valarie Tan, an analyst at the Germany-based Mercator Institute for China Studies. “Those promoted to power have had their political careers closely tied to Xi’s leadership, implying that this is going to be an administration that will not question or challenge Xi’s authority.”

In remarks to Sunday’s briefing, Xi said his administration would be on “high alert” for the challenges ahead. This echoed a speech to the opening of the congress when he elevated security to the top of the agenda, as Beijing navigates a slumping economy and soaring tensions with the U.S. and other Western nations.

“The journey ahead is long and arduous but with determined steps, we will reach our destination,” he said. “We will not be daunted by high winds, choppy waters or even dangerous storms.”

China would “always champion the common values of humanity” as the world grapples with “unprecedented challenges,” he added.

“When all countries pursue the cause of common good, we can live in harmony, engage in cooperation for mutual benefit and join hands to create a brighter future for the world,” he said. “Just as China cannot develop in isolation from the world, the world needs China for its development.”

On Saturday, nearly 2,300 party delegates chose a new Central Committee composed of 205 voting members that was pivotal to the top leadership shuffle. The newly picked committee met for the first time on Sunday behind closed doors to vote on candidates for the Politburo Standing Committee led by Xi as general secretary, and the larger Politburo.

Some of the current leaders were dropped including Premier Li Keqiang, who was scheduled to retire this year, as well as senior official Wang Yang, who had been seen as a contender for Xi’s second-in-command.

While the just-ended congress set out top officials and Xi as head of the party and military, some governmental positions will be confirmed in March at the National People’s Congress, China’s rubber-stamp parliament.

Most notably, Xi will renew his presidency for a third time, after he ditched a two-term limit from China’s constitution in 2018, opening the door for him to rule for life.

On Saturday, party cadres adopted changes to the party constitution that among other things incorporated Xi’s ideologies and economic policies including a focus on boosting domestic growth and reducing inequality.

“The document gives Xi’s ideas and leadership political legitimacy. Since it is a legal document, it can then be used by Xi to provide the legal basis for justifying the use of force to diffuse any tension, take down any opposition within the party-state,” Tan said. “Those who run afoul of those ideas enshrined in the constitution can be officially deemed as in violation of the party.”

In response to the expected outcome, Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Fla.) on Sunday said Chinese President Xi Jinping has “cemented his place as a 21st century emperor of China” after breaking with tradition and securing a third, five-year term to lead the nation.

“He has stacked to the organs of power in China with his loyalists. He has centralized power with himself. He has eliminated term limits,” Waltz told Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” host Mario Bartiromo. “He is dictator for life now, all with a major step towards what he sees as his legacy.”

Waltz, who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, said Xi has “become the most powerful Chinese dictator” since Mao Zedong, the communist dictator who founded the People’s Republic of China (PRC) party and ruled until his death in 1976.

“And that’s returning China to become the global superpower — not a superpower — but the global superpower, in line with ancient Chinese greatness,” Waltz added.

* * *

Below we summarize and excerpt the key points on the now concluded Chinese Congress from the Goldman economics team, which focuses on the new appointments, and the equity market implications (full note available to pro subs in the usual place)

1. Key features of the top leadership (Politburo Standing Committee)

  • The number of PSC members remains at seven, as widely expected. There are four new members in the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC): Li Qiang (currently serves as the Party Secretary of Shanghai),  Cai Qi (the primary secretary of the CCP Central Secretariat), Ding Xuexiang (served as director of the General Office of the CCP) and Li Xi (currently Party Secretary of Guangdong), who are all drawn from the previous 19th 25-member politburo (one rung below PSC in party leadership).
  • Most of  the new appointees worked with President Xi at earlier stages of their careers (for example Li Qiang and Cai Qi worked with Xi Jinping in Zhejiang and Ding Xuexiang has been working with Xi Jinping since 2007 in Shanghai). Li Keqiang (current Premier of the State Council), Li Zhanshu (current Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress), Wang Yang (current chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC)) and Han Zheng (current primary vice Premier of the State Council) have retired, while Xi Jinping, Wang Huning, and Zhao Leji remain as the Standing Committee members of the PSC.
  • Xi is reaffirmed as the party’s general secretary and chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC). Based on the lineup of the Standing Committee members, we think Xi will in all likelihood also keep his government position as the President of the PRC, and Li Qiang will likely be the Premier of the State Council; but these government-related roles will not be confirmed until the National People’s Congress (NPC) to be held in March next year.
  • Li Xi will replace Zhao Leji as the new chief of the party’s anti-corruption body (Central Commission of Disciplinary Inspection, CCDI), a party post that was also officially announced today. The government positions for the rest of the new PSC members will not be formally revealed until the NPC next March. Exhibit 1 compares the members of the 20th PSC with those of the 19th PSC.

2. More broadly on the new Politburo and the Central Committee, and amendments to the Party Constitution:

  • The number of the Politburo members declined marginally from 25 to 24. He Lifeng (current head of the NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) newly joined the Politburo and is widely expected to replace Liu He (a key economic policy advisor to Xi Jinping and the director of Central Finance and Economic Affairs Commission, the Financial Stability and Development Committee under the State Council) and to be in charge of policies related to the economy and the financial market. Other notable senior policymakers related to economic/financial policies include Yi Huiman, who is the 20th Central Committee member and currently serves as the head of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). The current head of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Guo Shuqing, is no longer a member of the 20th Central Committee; and the current head of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), Yi Gang, is no longer an alternate member of the 20th Central Committee; these imply they will retire from their government roles as well.

  • Based on our estimates, overall turnover rate of the 20th central committee (relative to the 19th Central Committee) is 66%, slightly higher than the 65% turnover rate of the 19th Central Committee (2017) and notably higher than the 57% rate of the 18th Central Committee (2012).

  • Amendments to the Party Constitution: Although the new version of the Party Constitution has not been released as of now, state media including Xinhua News have flagged major amendments. Besides more significant highlights of Xi Jinping’s thoughts, the new Party Constitution will incorporate “modernization with Chinese characteristics”, “dual circulation” strategy, “ensuring both development and security”, “uplifting the fighting spirit and enhancing the ability to fight”, “building a world-class army” and “resolutely opposing and foiling secessionist activities aimed at ‘Taiwan independence’” into the Party Constitution. There will also be continued focus on “high-quality growth” and “common prosperity”. It’s still unclear whether “Two Establishes” (两个确立) and “Two Safeguards” (两个维护) – two political slogans promoted by CCP to reinforce Party leadership under CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping – have been directly added to the Party Constitution, but state media has been emphasizing the importance of these requirements.

3. Policy implications and key upcoming events:

  • We do not think the 20th Party Congress (and its first Plenum) would be the occasions for key policy changes, and continue to expect a gradual relaxation of “Dynamic Zero Covid” policy stance to start in Q2 2023. Policy implementation could be more efficient though as personnel-related issues (related to party roles) have been settled.
  • Upcoming key policy events related to the economy include the Politburo meeting inn early December in preparation for the Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC), the CEWC itself by late December, and the Two Sessions in March 2023.

Equity market implications from the 20th Party Congress from the GS Portfolio Strategy team:

1. An unprecedented third term for President Xi. On October 23, at the opening day of the First Plenum of the 20th National Party Congress, President Xi was elected as the General Secretary of the CCP and the Chairman of the Central Military Commission for the next 5 years. The appointments deviate from implicit post-Mao Party conventions in at least two respects: a) a de facto 2-term limit for CCP General Secretary and the unwritten “7 up 8 down” retirement age for senior Party leaders; and, b) marking the first time for a top leader in the Party’s history to officially extend his reign for the third term since the Mao Zedong era.

2. Markets historically have liked political changes. Outside of the General Secretary position, 4 and 15 new members have been introduced to the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC) and the Politburo, effectively keeping the total number of PSC members unchanged but 1 less for the Politburo (24). Notable retirees from the Standing Committee are Premier Li Keqiang and Wang Yang, Chairman of the CPPCC, both at the age of 67. While data-points are limited, empirically, Chinese equities have usually performed well shortly after the conclusion of the Congress in the episodes where top leadership transition took place (i.e. changes in the highest and second-highest ranked Party leaders), with the post-Congress market performance positively correlated with the number of member changes at the Politburo. This perhaps reflects market expectation that incoming leaders would prioritize growth over other competing objectives when they took office, and possibly investors’ appreciation of the fact that the (policy-making) power transition mechanism was in place within the Party.

3. Gauging the policy and political focus of the new leaders. By tabulating the recent speeches during the Congress from outgoing and newly elected Politburo and PSC members as per our selected key words under two broad categories— ideology/politics, and economy/markets—we note that incoming leaders could arguably be more focused on ideological and political subjects while the retiring policymakers appear more economy/market-oriented. This orientation may also apply to two key positions that are influential to the capital markets—Premier and Vice Premier/Director of Financial Stability and Development Committee—possibly assumed by Li Qiang (former Party Secretary of Shanghai) and He Lifeng (Minister of the NDRC) respectively based on their current Party rankings. While we recognize this key-word analysis could be subject to selection bias given the nature of the Party Congress (political as opposed to economic) and the specific responsibilities of the Politburo members, the results are by and large consistent with the key messages from President Xi’s opening speech at the Congress last Sunday and the latest amendments to the Party Constitution, which carry a strong flavor of “development with Chinese characteristics” and national security. Government-related positions will be officially unveiled at the National People’s Congress scheduled in March 2023.

4. Elevated equity risk premium (ERP), even accounting for slower growth and higher risks ahead. MSCI China currently trades on 8.9x forward PE, 11.1x ex banks, and 12.5x on a median basis, all at around 1.8 s.d. below historical averages. Earnings yield gaps from median stocks are at 2.3 s.d. and 0.1 s.d. to the inexpensive side for the onshore and offshore markets, and implied volatility and option skew on HSCEI are close to year-to-date highs (in March), all suggesting that significant risk premia has been built into equity prices. From a modeling standpoint, the market is trading at around 15% valuation discounts to what we view as fundamental-driven fair value for Chinese stocks, and we estimate its prevailing valuations may have already priced in roughly 2.5% probability that left tail scenarios (proxied by Russia’s current index PE), possibly related to heightened geopolitical tensions or structural degradation in growth, could materialize assuming market risk premium and corporate profitability are normally distributed in our probability-weighted fair-value model. That said, more clarity on the Zero Covid Policy (ZCP), stabilization of the property market, and de-escalation of cross-strait and US-China tensions are necessary conditions for ERP to moderate, in our view.

5. Moving on from the Congress to (zero) Covid. Investors have been eagerly looking for policy signposts for re-opening during the Congress. This is understandably so as China reopening could be one of the most visible, long-awaited, and powerful upside catalysts for the market aside from the possibility of a (dovish) Fed pivot and/or a cessation of the Russia-Ukraine war, in our view. In fact, on a perfect hindsight basis, our cross-country empirical study from 36 markets since 2020 reveals that equity markets tended to pre-trade the actual implementation of re-opening (as defined by the peak readings of our economists’ Effective Lockdown index during the initial and the Delta waves), gaining 5% 1-month before Covid-related disruptions began to dissipate, with the positive momentum generally lasting for 2-3 months. Benchmarking this trading pattern to our economists’ baseline view that China will probably start to re-open in 2Q23, we’d argue China could start to trade cyclically better in the early part of next year, everything else being equal.

6. Strategies: Sticking with “Plan A” and “Little Giants”, taking advantage of elevated skew in the Offshore market, selectively raising SOEs. With risk assets globally still being challenged by rising rates, sticky inflation, and lurking recession risk, we reiterate our market preference of favoring A shares over Offshore equities given the former’s lower sensitivity to global macro factors, and domestic-oriented liquidity profile. In contrast, ERP could stay elevated for and weigh on Offshore equities in the  short run possibly due to investor concerns over the absence of recognized market-oriented economic reformers in the newly configured PSC, although a combination of elevated option skew (HSCEI), low headline index valuations, and light investor positioning (high short interest ratios) leads us to believe that upside optionality could be an inexpensive hedge to right tail surprises, most likely from improving clarity on the ZCP and re-opening roadmap. Thematically, we believe Chinese Little Giants are well-placed to benefit from strategic policy tailwinds and could be a key source of alpha generation for investors under President Xi’s leadership and development vision. The emphasis on and pursuit of “Common Prosperity” will likely strengthen under the new leadership, boding well for select SOEs that might be deemed as strategically- or socially-important by policymakers. As such, we screen for Buy-rated SOEs (on Conviction List) from our analysts team, and SOEs that are better positioned to generate superior equity returns based on their: 1) R&D intensity and R&D expense growth, and 2) focus on aligning shareholders’ and management’s interests (e.g., have a stock incentive plan), both of which have been key explanatory factors for their outperformance empirically.

More in the full Goldman note available to pro subs.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 14:08

Stockman: The Macroeconomic Consequences Of Lockdowns & The Aftermath

0
Stockman: The Macroeconomic Consequences Of Lockdowns & The Aftermath

Authored by David Stockman via The Brownstone Institute,

During the past three years, Washington has made three catastrophic errors.

These include:

  • The draconian one-size-fits-all Lockdowns in response to the Covid;

  • The insane $11 trillion bacchanalia of monetary and fiscal stimulus payment designed to counter the supply-side shutdowns caused by the Virus Patrol;

  • The mindless Sanctions War on Russia, which has caused global commodity markets to erupt skyward.

The resulting economic and financial dislocations, both global and domestic, are unprecedented and could not have come in a worst context. Prolonged fiscal and monetary excesses prior to February 2020 were already destined to generate an era of reckoning, even before Washington jumped the shark after the Covid panic was ignited by Donald Trump in March 2020.

Consider the course of fiscal and monetary policy over 2003-2019. During that 17-year period, the public debt share of GDP soared from an already high 62% to 111%, and the Fed’s balance sheet exploded under the bailouts of 2008-2009 and QE thereafter from $725 billion to $4.2 trillion. The latter embodied a growth rate of 11.0% per annum over the period, nearly three times the 4.0% growth rate of nominal GDP.

In a word, Washington policy makers had been on a reckless lark for the better part of two decades. It was only a matter of time before an unavoidable policy reversal toward restraint would bring the hothouse prosperity of both Wall Street and main street crashing down.

Public Debt As % of GDP and Fed Balance Sheet, 2003-2019

The history books will surely record, therefore, that it was Trump who foolishly ignited the above depicted ticking financial timebomb. Based on the facts known now and the evidence available then, the prolonged Lockdowns ordered by Trump on March 16, 2020 were one of the most capriciously destructive acts of the state in modern history.

The reason is simple: The Covid was at best a super flu that did not remotely rise to a Black Plague style existential threat to American society, and therefore did not warrant any extraordinary “public health” intervention at all. America’s medical care system was more than equipped to handle the elevated case loads among the elderly and comorbid that actually occurred.

Indeed, the IFR (infection fatality rate) for the under 70-years population has turned out to be so low as to make the brutal economic shutdowns ordered by the Donald and his Fauci-led Virus Patrol tantamount to crimes against the American people.

A thorough-going study by Professor Ioannidis and colleagues across 31 national seroprevalence studies in the pre-vaccination era,  for example, shows that the median infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was estimated to be just 0.035% for people aged 0-59 years and 0.095% for those aged 0-69 years. So we are talking about just four-to ten-hundredths of one percent of the infected populations succumbing to the disease.

A further breakdown by age group found that the average IFR was:

  • 0.0003% at 0-19 years

  • 0.003% at 20-29 years

  • 0.011% at 30-39 years

  • 0.035% at 40-49 years

  • 0.129% at 50-59 years 

  • 0.501% at 60-69 years.

There is just no beating around the bush. The Lockdowns impacted the livelihoods and social life primarily of the working age and youth populations depicted below, but not in a million years should the heavy hand of the state been brought to bear on their ordinary freedoms to conduct economic and social life as they saw fit.

Nor does the Donald and Fauci’s Virus Patrol get off the hook on the grounds that these dispositive facts about the Covid were not fully known in early March 2020. But to the contrary, the results of a live fire case study involving the 3,711 passengers and crew members of the famously stricken and stranded cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, were fully known at the time, and they were more than enough to quash the Lockdown hysteria.

During late January and February the virus had spread rapidly among the large, close-quartered population of the cruise ship, causing nearly 20% of the population to test positive—about half of which were symptomatic. Moreover, the population skewed elderly as is normally the case on cruise ships, with 2,165 people or 58% over 60-years of age and 1,242 or 33% over 70-years.

So if there was a vulnerable population sample this was it: That is, a stranded population of the mostly elderly in the close quarters of a cruise ship.

But, alas, the known mortality count from the Diamond Princess as of March 13, 2020 was just nine, and ultimately 13, meaning that the overall population survival rate was 99.8%. Moreover, all of these nine deaths were among the 70 years and older population, making the survival rate for even among the most vulnerable sub-population 99.3%,.

And, of course, for the 2,469 persons under 70-years of age on this ship, the survival rate was, well, 100%. 

That’s right. Donald Trump and his way-in-over-his-head son-in-law, Jared Kushner, knew or should have known that the survival rate of the under 70-years population on the Diamond Princess was 100%, and that there was no dire public emergency in any way, shape or form.

Under those conditions, anyone with a passing familiarity with the tenets of constitutional liberty and the requisites of free markets would have sent Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx and the rest of the public health power-grabbers packing.

That the Donald and Jared did not do. Instead, they got led by the nose for month after month by Fauci’s awful crew because basically Trump and Kushner were power-seekers and egomaniacs, not Republicans and certainly not conservatives.

The resulting unnecessary economic wreckage is almost unspeakable. Here are four measures which show that the instant plunge in economic activity triggered by the Lockdowns was simply off-the-charts compared to any prior history.

During Q2 2020, for example, real GDP plunged by 35% at an annualized rate, leaving the declines during the prior 11 post-war recessions (gray columns) far in the dust.

Annualized Change In Real GDP, 1947 to 2022

Likewise, the drop in Q2 employment was in a whole new zip code. During April 2020, the US economy shed 20.5 million payroll jobs—a figure that was 28X larger than the worst  job loss of the Great Recession in February 2009 (-747,000).

Monthly Change In Nonfarm Payrolls, 1939-2022

Even industrial production (black line), which was not nearly as heavily impacted as the Leisure & Hospitality (L&H) and other services industries, dropped by 13%, or nearly 4X more than during the worst month of the Great Recession.

At the same time, payrolls at ground zero of the Lockdowns— restaurants, bars, hotels and resorts (purple line)— plummeted by a staggering 46% during April 2020 or by 50X more than any prior monthly decline.

Monthly Change In Industrial Production and Leisure & Hospitality Payrolls, 1950-2022

To call the above a “supply-side shock” is hardly an adequate description. Donald Trump literally decimated the production side of the US economy because he did not have the gumption, knowledge and policy principles necessary to blow off Fauci’s statist attack on America’s market economy.

But what came thereafter was actually worse. The Donald did not care a wit about fiscal rectitude and the surging public debt that was already in place; and actually had demanded time and again even more egregious money-printing than the ship of fools in the Eccles Building were already foisting upon the American economy.

So he loudly clambered on board as the panicked politicians on Capitol Hill and the money-printers at the Fed opened the stimulus sluice gates like never before. The resulting disaster is now coming home to roost, with Joe Biden being the available fall guy, and rightfully so–given the compounding damage being wrought by his truly idiotic proxy war against Russia and the related Sanctions War attack on the global trading and payments system.

Still, at the end of the day the disaster now unfolding was ignited by the Donald from the combustible fiscal and monetary brew he inherited.

And his current dominance of the GOP tells you all you need to know about what lies ahead. The once-upon-a- time “conservative party” in the economic governance of America has become about as useless for the task as teats on a boar.

The Aftermath

Needless to say, the 35% annualized plunge in real GDP during Q2 2020 was not caused by “aggregate demand” suddenly petering out. In fact, there was nothing about this unprecedented collapse in economic activity that was remotely related to the prevailing Keynesian demand-driven models.

To the contrary, the Covid contraction was all about the supply side. The latter had been directly monkey-hammered not by reluctant consumers and spenders, but by the marauding Virus Patrol which was shutting down restaurants, bars, gyms, ball parks, movie theaters, malls and countless more via direct “command and control” orders of the state.

To be sure, when you lay off 20.5 million workers in a single-month (April 2020), for instance, that does cause household purchasing power to diminish. But it was also a case of Say’s Law getting its due. Diminished supply was curtailing its own demand.

Indeed, the derivative loss of “aggregate demand” in April 2020 and the months immediately thereafter was tracking the prior loss of production and income. Consequently, the Keynesian solution of replenishing the lost demand with government transfer payments, promised only to draw down existing inventories, pull in more imports from less supply-constrained economies abroad and eventually inflate the price of existing supplies–whether from inventories, domestic production or sources abroad.

In fact, this is exactly what happened in a process of further drastic economic distortion compared to all prior history. In the case of retail inventories, stimmy-fueled “demand” literally sucked the inventory stocks dry. The ratio to sales plunged to an unheard of low of 1.09 months by May 2021.

Retail Inventory-To-Sales Ratio, 1992-2021

Likewise, import volumes erupted like never before. Between the pre-Covid level of $203 billion per month in January 2020 goods imports have soared by 46% to $297 billion per month. That’s a $1.1 trillion annual rate of gain!

China, South Korea, Vietnam and Mexico are undoubtedly grateful. But the only pump Washington’s massive stimmies primed was located mainly in foreign economies. Meanwhile, the US economy struggled all the way through this period because the  shutdown orders and fears generated by the Virus Patrol drastically constricted the supply side of the US economy.

Keynesian demand had nothing to do with it!

US Monthly Imports Of Goods, 2012-2021

In fact, the startling eruption of demand for durable goods leaves no doubt about how wrongheaded the giant stimmies actually were. Since money could not be readily spent on the normal slate of services, households went bananas spending their restaurant money savings and their multiple rounds of stimmies on goods that could be delivered to the front door by Amazon.

By the time the stimmies peaked in April 2021, personal consumption expenditures for goods were up by a staggering 79% over prior year. The resulting aberration in the flow of economic activity is plain as day in the chart below.

Y/Y Change In Personal Consumption Expenditures For Durable Goods, 2007-2021

At length, foreign supply chains buckled under the weight of artificial demand for goods stimulated by Washington and European policy-makers—a dislocation that was then compounded when their unhinged Sanctions War against Russia caused petroleum, wheat and other commodity prices to soar, as well.

As best shown by the lead indicator of upstream PPI prices for intermediate processed goods, inflation was brewing in the supply pipeline as early as September 2020, when the annualized rate of change posted at 5.6%. By December 2020 that figure had risen to 17.0%, and then was off to the races: Wholesale prices for processed goods were rising  at a 43% annualized rate by March 2021.

As it happened, the downstream CPI began to accelerate in March 2021, but by then the die was cast. Washington’s foolish attempt to massively stimulate “demand” in an economy that was being drastically curtailed on the supply side by its own public health orders and policies had already ignited the most powerful inflationary cycle in 40 years.

Of course, in March 2021, at the peak in the brown line below, Washington was still in full-on stimulus mode. Joe Biden’s $2 trillion American Rescue Act was injecting another round of fiscal stimulus, even as the Fed persevered in buying $120 billion per month of government and GSE debt.

Annualized Rate Of Change, PPI For Intermediate Processed Goods, September 2020 to May 2021

Here is the annualized rate of government transfer payments for the last two cycles—with the latter one, again, being off the charts by a country mile.

During the Great Recession cycle, the maximum increase in the government transfer payment rate was +$640 billion and 36% between December 2007 and May 2008 (i.e. the Bush tax rebate stimulus of that month was actually bigger than Obama’s shovel ready stimulus in February 2009).

By contrast, under the absolute frenzy of stimmies during the Covid cycle, government transfer payments increased from a run rate of $3.15 trillion per annum in February 2020 to $8.10 trillion by March 2021. That’s when the two Trump stimmies and the Biden add-on maxed out at $6 trillion in total spending.

The math of it is staggering. The annualized rate of government transfer payments rose by $4.9 trillion during that period, representing an out-of-this-world gain of 156% in just 13 months!

Is there any wonder that the American economy has been over-run with a “demand shock” of biblical proportion?

Annualized Rate Of Government Transfer Payments,  November 2007 to March 2021

An eruption of government spending and borrowing of this staggering magnitude within a matter of months would have normally caused a giant squeeze in the bond pits, sending  bond yields soaring skyward. But that didn’t happen: The benchmark yield on the 10-year UST (purple line) actually fell from an already low 3.15% in October 2018 to an absurd 0.55% in July 2020, and remained at just 1.83% thru February 2022.

There is no mystery as to why. During the same period, the Fed’s balance sheet (black line) erupted as never before, rising from $4.1 trillion to a peak of $8.9 trillion by February 2022. That is to say, the Eccles Building monetized a huge share of the stimmy spending, thereby drastically falsifying the entire market for government debt and all the private household and business debt that prices off from it.

Is it any wonder, therefore, that the Virus Patrol was able to run roughshod over the private economy?

Washington compensated one and all for the resulting harm and then some by unleashing a $6 trillion spending bacchanalia in less than 14 months, which was accomplished with barely a dissent from either party to the Washington duopoly because interest rates on government debt had plunged to an all-time low. In turn, that was enabled by the most reckless spurt of money printing and debt monetization in recorded history.

Meanwhile, the stock market and related risk assets rose by 60% on average and by two times, three times, and ten times in some of the hottest “momo” sectors during the same period. America was simply drunk on spending without production, borrowing without saving and money-printing without limit. It all amounted to a phantasmagoria of financial excess like had never before even been imagined, let alone attempted.

Fed Balance Sheet And Yield On 10-Year UST, October 2018 to February 2022

The real skunk on the woodpile, however, is that the rationalization for all of this fiscal and monetary excess —protecting households and businesses from the plunge of economic activity — was essentially bogus. The lost aggregate demand did not need to be replaced with stimulus and free stuff because there had been a prior and equal decline in aggregate production and income.

The only “stimulus” needed to restore the economy’s status quo ante was to send the Virus Patrol packing. That is to say, the Fed’s balance sheet could have stayed at $4 trillion (better yet it could have been returned to the previous path of QT-based shrinkage), even as the fiscal equation could have been pushed toward balance after decades of reckless borrowing.

To be sure, low-wage workers got hit the hardest because they worked in the services sectors slammed by the Virus Patrol, meaning there was an “equity” case for some kind of government help in these cases. But, alas, the help was already there in the form of the automatic shock absorbers that have been erected in the Welfare State over the last decades. We are referring to unemployment insurance, food stamps, ObamaCare, Medicaid and a medley of lesser means-tested programs.

The emphasis here is on means-tested. The so-called Safety Net was fully in place, would have covered 90% of the Covid-Lockdown hardship automatically and therefore required no fiscal bailout legislation at all, to say nothing of the $6 trillion of spending orgies that actually transpired.

The only thing missing was that fact that state unemployment programs generally exclude gig and part-time workers, the very modest segment of the labor force that got clobbered the hardest. But a year’s worth of support at $30,000 per worker (more than they make on average) for an estimated 5 million gig workers not covered by regular state UI programs would have cost $150 billion or just 2.5% of the tidal wave of Covid relief spending that actually occurred.

In any event, the US economy was a financial timebomb fixing to explode in February 2022 when Joe Biden decided to save “Novorossiya” (New Russia) from the Russians, who had intervened to protect their kinsman from the devastating attacks being leveled on the Donbas by the anti-Russian government planted in Kiev by Washington during the February 2014 coup.

The resulting Washington-inspired Sanction War on the largest commodity producer on planet earth was the tripwire for the calamity now underway.

Washington’s three great errors have turned the world upside-down. An economy freighted down with $92 trillion of public and private debt was, is and will remain an accident waiting to happen.

*  *  *

Republished from David Stockman’s site.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 13:30

Russian Jet Nosedives Into Building In Siberia In 2nd Deadly Crash Within A Week

0
Russian Jet Nosedives Into Building In Siberia In 2nd Deadly Crash Within A Week

Russia’s military has suffered a second fighter jet crash in less than a week within its own borders on Sunday. Two pilots were killed when their Su-30 fighter jet went down in the city of Irkutsk in southern Siberia on Sunday. 

Dramatic and shocking video shows the aircraft dive almost vertically before slamming into a two-story residential building. The families that reside there were unharmed, according to a statement by the regional governor. 

Social media stillframe of crash aftermath on Sunday, via Mash.

Emergency crews were on the scene quickly as a huge fireball engulfed the building upon impact. It’s being described as an accident which occurred in the midst of routine flight training.

Some Russian sources referred to it as a “test flight” – and interestingly the city is home to an aircraft factory which manufactures Su-30 fighters.

According to the BBC, “Russia’s state Investigative Committee said it had opened a criminal investigation into violations of air safety rules.”

Sunday’s crash was caught on video from multiple angles by passersby on the ground. The jet is seen in a freefall nosedive and no ejection or parachutes were seen deployed.

A mere one week ago a training flight crash involving a Sukhoi Su-34 slamming into an apartment complex resulted in the deaths of 15 people on the ground. 

Both incidents appeared completely unrelated to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, where Russian aerial forces have stepped up operations across the country of late, particularly targeting Ukrainian energy infrastructure. 

Below: newly published footage of the prior crash in Yeysk on October 17.

In the prior incident, which took place in the town of Yeysk, the pilots ejected at the very last moment and survived the accident. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 13:00

A Lesson In Markets & Bureaucracies: The Very Instructive History Of Rat Farms

0
A Lesson In Markets & Bureaucracies: The Very Instructive History Of Rat Farms

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

In effect, authorities created two rat farms, both unintended: the sewers, and the private-sector rat-farms.

The history of Rat Farms offers a valuable lesson in how markets and bureaucracies work.

The story of how the colonial authorities in Hanoi came to establish two kinds of rat farms is highly instructive.

The first rat farm was unintentional. French colonial authorities decided to modernize the French Quarter of Hanoi (where Westerners lived) by constructing a modern sewer system, the overall goal being to establish “a little Paris in the East.”

Their understanding of sewers was limited to the first-order effects: sewers safely collected and disposed of human waste.

They did not anticipate the second-order effect: the sewer was Rat Paradise, as “the pipes offered rats a new ecological niche, free of predators and full of food.”

Second-order effects generate unintended consequences. (First-order effects: actions have consequences. Second-order effects: consequences have their own consequences.)

Rats proliferated in the sewers and began roaming the streets of Hanoi–not exactly the results intended by the authorities.

Matters became worse when in 1902 a first case of bubonic plague was detected. Modernity had created a potential health crisis.

To combat the exploding rat population, authorities hired crews to enter the sewers and kill the rats– unpleasant and hazardous work.

Despite killing thousands of rats per day, the rats’ tremendous fertility was more than a match for the extermination crews.

In an effort to recruit the local populace as rat-catchers / killers, the authorities offered the public a bounty for every dead rat, and later on for every rat-tail when the pile of rats waiting to be incinerated became too high.

Authorities then noticed tail-less rats around Hanoi: residents caught the rats, cut off their tails, and then freed them to continue breeding to insure a steady supply of profitable rat-tails.

Once again, authorities had failed to consider second-order effects.

The authorities soon discovered the ultimate manifestation of the perverse incentives the bounty had created: rat-farms had been established around Hanoi by private-sector entrepreneurs to maximize the harvesting of profitable rat-tails.

In effect, authorities created two rat farms, both unintended: the sewers, and the private-sector rat-farms.

Perverse incentives and unintended consequences are, like rats, ever-present.

In 1998, the Vietnamese authorities closed restaurants selling cat meat, which was marketed as “little tiger meat”, because they thought that if the cat population decreased, rats would invade the rice fields, showcasing a similar mentality to the French almost a century earlier.

The modern iterations of perverse incentives and unintended consequences generally follow this line of development:

1. Massive new funding is made available to address a pressing problem: higher education, healthcare, homelessness, intelligence-gathering, national defense, etc.

2. This massive influx of new funding creates a new ecological niche free of predators and full of food, enabling the explosive growth of administrators, support staff, consultants and con-artists, all of whom have zero incentive to actually solve the problem and every incentive to expand the problem so their protected Paradise gets more funding.

This is higher education, healthcare, homelessness, intelligence gathering and national defense in a nutshell.

Sources:

Great Hanoi Rat Hunt, The: Empire, Disease, and Modernity in French Colonial Vietnam (book review)

Great Hanoi Rat Massacre (wikipedia)

*  *  *

A version of this essay was first published as a weekly Musings Report sent exclusively to subscribers and patrons at the $5/month ($50/year) and higher level. Thank you, patrons and subscribers, for supporting my work and free website.

My new book is now available at a 10% discount ($8.95 ebook, $18 print): Self-Reliance in the 21st Century. Read the first chapter for free (PDF)

Become a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 12:30

‘Massive New Strikes’ Leave 1.5 Million Ukrainians Without Power, Phased Blackouts In Kiev

0
‘Massive New Strikes’ Leave 1.5 Million Ukrainians Without Power, Phased Blackouts In Kiev

Now much of Western Ukraine, which lies far away from the front lines of fighting with Russia in the east, is without power due to fresh weekend airstrikes across the country. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a Saturday night address said new “massive” strikes targeted Dnipropetrovsk, Khmelnytsky, Kirovohrad, Mykolaiv, Odessa, Rivne, Volyn and Zaporizhia regions.

“We continue eliminating the aftermath of today’s terrorist attacks on our infrastructure,” Zelensky said. “The geography of this new massive strike is very wide.”

Thermal power plant on fire following Russian strike, via Reuters.

The past days have already seen power outages in Kyiv, with energy grid authorities warning of rolling blackouts, and urging residents to take power-saving measures such as the avoidance of running large appliances. 

On Saturday the national power utility operator Ukrenergo said that damage from the latest round of Russian strikes set a new record. The Saturday air offensive by Russia was bigger than an initial major wave of strikes from earlier this month:

Over 1.4 million Ukrainian households have lost electricity after a morning of repeated Russian air raids, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office says.

The Ukrainian General Staff reported that 40 cruise missiles and 16 allegedly Iranian-made drones hit Ukraine throughout the day.

Oleksandr Kharchenko, a Ukrainian energy official, said in an interview with US media that national infrastructure vital for the people is facing “really huge trouble”.

“When you don’t have electricity in a city, it means you have no water, you have no supply of gas, you have nothing,” Kharchenko said. Days prior to the stepped-up Saturday assault the government said one-third of all power stations had been hit or damaged in Russian strikes. 

Most new damage to energy has been recorded in the country’s west, south and center, with some hospitals since reporting they are running on backup generators. Reserves of oxygen and fresh water are also being tapped by hospitals. 

Ukrenegro has on Sunday introduced phased blackouts to “avoid accidents”, per The Guardian

The blackouts began at 11.13am local time (09.30am BST), with households in Kyiv divided into three groups that will be “disconnected for a certain period of time”, DTEK said.

It added that the blackouts should last “no more than four hours” but may be longer “due to the scale of damage to the power supply system”.

According to the latest estimate of the damage reported in Reuters, “Russia has hit at least half of Ukraine’s thermal generation capacity and caused billions of dollars of damage in attacks since Oct. 10, but not all stricken power units have stopped working completely, Ukraine’s energy minister said on Friday.”

Further, “Herman Halushchenko told Reuters in an interview that 30-40% of overall national power infrastructure had been hit in attacks that he depicted as intended to destroy Ukraine’s energy system — a goal that he said had not been achieved.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 12:00

Rally Against ‘Child Mutilation’ Draws Thousands Of Supporters

0
Rally Against ‘Child Mutilation’ Draws Thousands Of Supporters

Authored by Darlene  McCormick Sanchez via The Epoch Times,

Some 2,000 people turned out for the “Rally to End Child Mutilation” held in downtown Nashville Friday as a host of conservative speakers vowed to make gender transition for children illegal.

The mainly conservative crowd gathered at the War Memorial Plaza near the state capital in support of stopping surgery and chemical castration of minors.

A group of protesters favoring transgender “rights” for children tried to shout down the speakers by chanting, screaming profanities, and using sirens.

Protestors with megaphones yell at supporters of Matt Walsh and The Daily Wire’s “Rally to End Child Mutilation” Oct. 21, 2022 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Bobby Sanchez for The Epoch Times)

Matt Walsh, a conservative commentator for The Daily Wire, was greeted like a rockstar as he took the stage to give the keynote speech.

He called the group of protestors cowards because they didn’t want anyone to hear the truth about the “cult of gender ideology.” Walsh said attempting to shut down those speaking up for children wouldn’t work.

“We’re still here,” he shouted. “We are fighting for truth.”

He said that if parents don’t take a stand, America’s children will be subjected to hormones and genital mutilation.

“We’re not going to rest until every child is protected from this madness,” he added.

Walsh said the woke culture preys upon children and tries to cover their actions with lies, adding that this battle is one of “good versus evil.”

Matt Walsh speaks at War Memorial Plaza during the “Rally to End Child Mutilation” Oct. 21, 2022 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Bobby Sanchez for The Epoch Times)

Walsh first drew attention to a doctor at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville touting the profitability of transgender procedures for minors with gender dysphoria.

The expose caused an uproar among conservatives nationwide.

On Oct. 7, Vanderbilt announced it would temporarily pause gender surgeries on patients under 18 after Tenn. Republican Gov. Bill Lee called for an investigation into the clinic.

Walsh’s appearance was followed by 11 speakers, including detransitioners and GOP lawmakers. Detransitioners are people who came to regret going on the irreversible path of chemically and surgically altering their bodies.

Tennessee House Majority Leader William Lamberth (R-Portland) and state Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson (R-Franklin) said they planned to introduce legislation to ban gender surgeries on minor children.

U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said she would work to stop the practice on the federal level. Blackburn said she asked the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration to launch an investigation into the long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee business meeting to vote on Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on Capitol Hill in Washington, on April 4, 2022. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images).

“We are going to carry this movement. We are going to take it to every state in the country,” she said.

Scott Newgent, a woman who transitioned to appear like a man, told the crowd that gender surgery for children has nothing to do with human rights but everything to do with money.

Newgent said surgery could not change people from one sex to another.

“The truth is I’m a woman and will never be a man,” Newgent said.

Photo provided by Scott Newgent, man who told his story in “What is a Woman” movie by Matt Walsh in 2022 (Photo Courtesy of Scott Newgent)

Newgent said the medical establishment was putting children on puberty blockers and “butchering” them for money. Once they start transitioning, they become patients for life, he added.

He said that the transgender industry is expected to hit $5 billion by the end of the decade.

California “detransitioner” Chloe Cole captivated the audience with her cautionary tale. Cole said she loved being a girl until she got older and began associating more with boys.

By the time she was 11, she was bombarded by transgender content on the internet and began transitioning at 13, she said.

She remembers her parents taking her to a therapist for help. Instead, the therapist told her parents if they didn’t go along with her desire to become a boy, she was in danger of suicide. It effectively silenced the people who cared most about her.

“These doctors and therapists were just butchers and liars,” she said.

Chloe Cole, center, poses with supporters after Matt Walsh’s rally Oct. 21, 2022 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Bobby Sanchez for The Epoch Times)

Christians and patriots carrying flags were on one side, while protesters with brightly colored hair and signs gathered on the opposite side.

Most people stood quietly, waiting for the speakers.

Luke Teague, 19, came from Dallas because he’s a fan of Walsh and wanted to support him. He said something needed to be done to protect children from transitioning.

A 34-year-old “nonbinary” man who declined to give his name said he grew up in Nashville and remembers feeling alienated growing up with gender dysphoria. So he decided to come out to support children who may feel alone.

Protesters at a Matt Walsh’s “Rally to End Child Mutilation” hold signs for transgender rights Oct. 21, 2022 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Bobby Sanchez for The Epoch Times)

Amy Dickinson Campbell of Bruceton, Tenn., sees things from both sides. She is against children transitioning and has told teens to wait and see how they feel when they are adults.

On the other hand, her 21-year-old daughter is “nonbinary” and wants to be called they or them. Campbell said worse things could happen and loves her daughter regardless.

“I’m 51. I couldn’t imagine being a kid in today’s society,” she said.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 11:30

Dem Grip On Senate In Peril As GOP Pulling Ahead In Nevada Race

0
Dem Grip On Senate In Peril As GOP Pulling Ahead In Nevada Race

For Republicans to take control of the U.S. Senate, they’ll need to flip at least one seat currently held by Democrats. That’s looking increasingly likely, as the Republican challenger in Nevada is pulling ahead of the incumbent Democrat in the latest polls. 

The race pits one-term incumbent Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto against Republican Adam Laxalt; both are former Nevada attorneys general. According to a Rasmussen poll released on Friday, Laxalt leads Cortez Masto 48% to 43%. Unaffiliated voters back the Republican by an 18-point margin — 48% to 30%.

A CBS News/YouGov poll published on Thursday put Laxalt up 1%, and found Cortez Masto is backed by 57% of women while Laxalt is the choice of 56% of men.

Latino support of the Democratic Party is fading across the nation, and Nevada is no exception: While Cortez Masto won the Latino vote by 29 points in 2016, she’s only up 18 this year, according to CBS News/YouGov. 

Sticking to the Republicans’ 2022 playbook, the Laxalt campaign has centered on the economy, inflation, crime and immigration. In Nevada as elsewhere, those are the top issues of concern to voters. When asked which is the best party to address them, more voters say Republicans are. 

Pocketbook issues carry more weight in Nevada, a state with a higher proportion of working-class voters — many of whom were laid off in the wake of pandemic shutdowns favored by Democrats. Today, Nevada gas prices are among the highest of any state, averaging $5.11 a gallon, which is nearly 34% above the nationwide average.

 

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v Wade, Democrats hoped the abortion issue would give Cortez Masto the edge she needed as one of their most vulnerable Senate incumbents. The problem is abortion is far from being a top concern of voters.

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville — who coined the expression “it’s the economy, stupid” during the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign — takes a dim view of the party’s emphasis on the issue. 

“A lot of these consultants think if all we do is run abortion spots that will win for us. I don’t think so,” he told Associated Press. “It’s a good issue. But if you just sit there and they’re pummeling you on crime and pummeling you on the cost of living, you’ve got to be more aggressive than just yelling abortion every other word.” 

Laxalt has taken a light-handed approach to the abortion issue, calling legal abortion “settled law” in Nevada, while supporting a state referendum to impose restrictions after 13 weeks instead of the current 24 weeks. About 70% of Nevadans say abortion should be “mostly legal.” 

Yusette Solomon, who canvasses for Nevada’s pro-Democrat Culinary Workers union, tells AP that voters he interacts with don’t talk much about abortion. Rather, it’s tough economic conditions: “It’s hard for everybody. It’s the supermarket. It’s gas. Inflation is something we need to deal with. Everyone’s feeling it.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 09:55

“Frankly Terrifying”: Energy Crisis Could Drag 26M Brits Into Fuel Poverty

0
“Frankly Terrifying”: Energy Crisis Could Drag 26M Brits Into Fuel Poverty

Via OilPrice.com,

The axing of the energy price guarantee from April next year could lead to almost 11m UK households falling into fuel poverty, campaigners have warned, which is about 26m people.

It means more than one in three British households face the grim prospect of hardship: there are an estimated 28.1m households in the UK. The average household in Britain has 2.36 people.

The End Fuel Poverty Coalition described the outlook as “frankly terrifying” and urged the Government to focus on a new package of support and energy market reforms, alongside investment in home insulation and renewables.

The predicted increase from the current seven million households in fuel poverty to 10.7 million after the Government lifts its guarantee limiting the average household energy bill to £2,500 from April will then fall slightly – but will still leave 10.1 million households in fuel poverty in the winter of 2023/24, the group said.

Protest in London

The figures come as protesters gather in London to ask MPs to back plans for a universal basic energy allowance to meet heating, cooking and lighting needs, part of the ‘Energy For All’ petition which will be handed to Downing Street on Wednesday with more than 600,000 signatures.

The Warm This Winter campaign called for the immediate suspension of all forced transfers of households onto more expensive pre-payment meters, whether by court warrant or remotely via smart meters.

Ruth London, from Fuel Poverty Action, said: “The outlook is frankly terrifying. It is now all the more essential – and more possible – to win a totally new pricing framework like Energy For All. Finally there is now support for this inside Parliament.”

Simon Francis, co-ordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, said:

“The Government may have brought some stability to the markets, but it has come at the cost of huge instability in households’ finances.

“The new Chancellor must work quickly, and with consumer groups and charities, to design a new package of support and energy market reforms that will help those in fuel poverty now and post-April.

“But while the political focus on energy bills may now have shifted to next April, millions of the most vulnerable will be living in cold and damp homes this winter and will need further financial and non-financial support.”

Firms urged to prepay customers

Meanwhile, consumer site MoneySavingExpert (MSE) urged some of the biggest energy firms to allow prepay customers with smart meters to use their £400 Government support payment on both electricity and gas, to ensure they can maintain heating this winter.

Prepayment customers with traditional meters can decide where best to use the payments, which come in six monthly instalments between now and March 2023, as they are sent as a voucher they can use to top up their electricity or gas meter. However for those with smart meters, the payment is usually applied to their electricity meter by default, so they have less choice.

Gary Caffell, head of energy at MSE, said: “We appreciate that suppliers have acted fast to deliver the first of these crucial support payments.

“But combined with the wider cost of living crisis – affecting all other areas of people’s finances – not allowing customers flexibility to transfer some or all of these payments to gas meters puts these people, many of whom are vulnerable, at a much higher risk of reaching a crisis point in the coming months.

“Some may simply not be able to afford to heat their homes.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 10/23/2022 – 09:20