58.1 F
Chicago
Saturday, September 26, 2026
Home Blog Page 2490

MSNBC Host Calls For Biden Aides To Be Allowed ON STAGE With Him At Next Debate

MSNBC Host Calls For Biden Aides To Be Allowed ON STAGE With Him At Next Debate

Authored by Steve Watson via modernity.news,

MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell has called for allowing Joe Biden to have aides with him on stage to speak for him and help him sound coherent.

Yes, really. This is where we are now.

O’Donnell said that it would be good to “Allow the candidates to have as many staff as they want, join them on the stage throughout the debate, and make sure that all of them have microphones.”

He added that “the candidates should be allowed to turn to their staff and confer with them about anything at any time in the debate.”

“And we should be able to hear everything they say. So we can hear if the candidate has competent or incompetent staff, we could hear the candidate overrule some advisers and say something else,” he continued.

“We could watch the candidates actually think and process information, including including possibly information that they might not know until a staff member tells them or reminds them,” O’Donnell further suggested.

He continued, “A candidate should be allowed to let staff members actually answer questions for them.”

When he says ‘candidates’ he means Biden, because Trump clearly doesn’t need people talking for him. Only the mentally deficient, incoherent, bumbling Biden needs that.

What is this supposed to be? Show and tell at pre school?

It’s a debate between candidates who are expected to lead the country. They shouldn’t need people to help them talk.

It’s not a debate between the candidates if other people are doing the talking.

O’Donnell is only putting the ludicrous suggestion out because it is clear that Biden is not running anything. His aides are doing it all.

Indeed, an Axios report notes how literally everything Biden does is micromanaged and written down for him, down to where and when he walks and stands.

The report notes that “One template — a copy of which was obtained by Axios — is short and simple, with one large picture of the event space on each page, accompanied with big text such as: ‘View from podium,’ and ‘View from audience.’ In the five-page document, two pages are separate pictures of, ‘Walk to podium.’”

“Before a presidential event, the White House sends event staffers a document to emulate when preparing their own materials for the president,” the report further states.

One staffer told Axios that “It surprised me that a seasoned political pro like the president would need detailed verbal and visual instructions on how to enter and exit a room.”

This has been going on for years now:

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 10:45

Key Events This Week: CPI, Powell Speaks And Earnings Season Starts

Key Events This Week: CPI, Powell Speaks And Earnings Season Starts

Usually the macro calendar goes quieter the week after payrolls but that’s not the case now as there’s a lot to digest this week with the US CPI report (Thursday) and Fed Chair Powell’s testimonies to the Senate and House committees (Tuesday and Wednesday) the obvious highlights alongside PPI and the start of US Q2 earnings season on Friday with JP Morgan, Citi and Wells Fargo reporting. Besides Powell, we will also get numerous other Fed speakers this week.

Outside of these the day by day highlights are NY Fed 1-yr inflation expectations today, tomorrow’s US small business optimism survey to see if the “K” shaped recovery continues. Wednesday sees China’s CPI and PPI, Japan’s PPI, Norwegian and Danish CPI, Italian IP and a US 10yr Treasury auction. Thursday sees the latest US monthly budget numbers alongside jobless claims which will continue to get close attention given recent mixed signals on the US labor market. There is also a 30yr Treasury auction. On Friday the University of Michigan survey and Swedish CPI will be the highlight outside of the main events mentioned above. In geopolitics, there is a NATO summit Tuesday through Thursday, and Indian PM Modi visits Russia today and tomorrow both of which may generate headlines. The full week ahead is at the end as usual.

Let’s now preview the US CPI and PPI releases and review a mixed payroll print on Friday. The headline CPI should print soft (+0.09% MoM Deutsche Bank forecast vs. +0.01% previously) thanks to falling gas prices. However core is expected to edge up (+0.25% MoM vs. +0.16%).

If DB economists are correct, YoY headline CPI will fall by two-tenths to 3.1%, with core edging up a tenth to 3.5%. However three-month annualized core would fall four tenth to 2.9%, though the six-month annualized rate would stay at 3.7%. For the PPI we always look at the categories feeding into core PCE, namely health care services, airfares and portfolio management. The final of these three should be firm given the recent rally in equities and airfares could bounce back after a weak May. This also could be the end of easy comps as weak July and August prints will soon roll out of the YoY numbers. This is important as if markets do want a September cut then a bit more progress is needed on inflation absent an “unexpected weakening” (in Powell’s words) in the employment situation.

Finally, as noted above, Q2 earnings season begins Friday when JPM, Wells, Citi and BNY all report.

Finally, courtesy of DB, here is a day-by-day calendar of events

Monday July 8

  • Data : US June NY Fed 1-yr inflation expectations, May consumer credit, Japan May labor cash earnings, BoP current account balance, BoP trade balance, June bank lending, Economy Watchers survey, Germany May trade balance
  • Central banks : BoE’s Haskel speaks

Tuesday July 9

  • Data : US June NFIB small business optimism, Japan June M3, M2, machine tool orders
  • Central banks : Fed’s Powell testifies to Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs committee
  • Auctions : US 3-yr Notes ($58bn)

Wednesday July 10

  • Data : US May wholesale trade sales, China June CPI, PPI, Japan June PPI, Italy May industrial production, Norway June CPI, PPI, Denmark June CPI
  • Central banks : Fed’s Powell testifies to the House Financial Services committee, Goolsbee and Bowman speak, ECB’s Nagel speaks, BoE’s Pill speaks, RBNZ decision
  • Auctions : US 10-yr Notes (reopening, $39bn)

Thursday July 11

  • Data : US June CPI, monthly budget statement, initial jobless claims, UK June RICS house price balance, May monthly GDP, Japan May core machine orders
  • Central banks : Fed’s Bostic and Musalem speak
  • Earnings : PepsiCo
  • Auctions : US 30-yr Bond (reopening, $22bn)

Friday July 12

  • Data : US June PPI, July University of Michigan survey, China June trade balance, Japan May capacity utilisation, Germany May current account balance, retail sales, June wholesale price index, Canada June existing home sales, May building permits, Sweden June CPI
  • Earnings : JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo

* * *

Finally, looking at just the US, Goldman writes that the key economic data releases this week are the CPI report on Thursday and the PPI and University of Michigan reports on Friday. Chair Powell will testify to congressional committees on Tuesday and Wednesday, and there are several other speaking engagements from Fed officials this week, including Governors Barr, Bowman, and Cook and Presidents Goolsbee, Bostic, and Musalem.

Monday, July 8

  • 11:00 AM NY Fed 1-year inflation expectations, June (last +3.17%)

Tuesday, July 9

  • 06:00 AM NFIB small business optimism, June (consensus 90.2, last 90.5)
  • 09:15 AM Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Barr speaks: Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr will speak on financial inclusion at an event in Washington, D.C. Speech text is expected.
  • 10:00 AM Fed Chair Powell speaks: Fed Chair Jerome Powell will present the semiannual monetary policy report to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Speech text and a Q&A are expected. On July 2, Chair Powell emphasized that there had been “a lot of progress” on inflation at the ECB Forum on Central Banking in Sintra, Portugal. Powell reiterated that the FOMC wanted “to be more confident that inflation is moving sustainably down” to its 2% target before starting to cut rates. He also emphasized that the FOMC faced more two-sided risks to achieving its inflation and employment goals, which had been “a big change” from a year ago. On July 3, the minutes to the FOMC’s June meeting emphasized that although inflation remained elevated, there had been “modest further progress” in recent months.
  • 01:30 PM Fed Governor Bowman speaks: Fed Governor Michelle Bowman will speak on promoting an inclusive financial system at an event in Washington, D.C. Speech text and a Q&A are expected. On June 27, Bowman said, “Should the incoming data indicate that inflation is moving sustainably toward our 2% goal, it will eventually become appropriate to gradually lower the federal funds rate to prevent monetary policy from becoming overly restrictive…we are still not yet at the point where it is appropriate to lower the policy rate, and I continue to see a number of upside risks to inflation…I remain willing to raise the target range for the federal funds rate at a future meeting should the incoming data indicate that progress on inflation has stalled or reversed.”

Wednesday, July 10

  • 10:00 AM Wholesale inventories, May final (consensus +0.6%, last +0.6%)
  • 10:00 AM Fed Chair Powell speaks: Fed Chair Jerome Powell will testify before the House Financial Services Committee. Speech text and a Q&A are expected.
  • 02:30 PM Chicago Fed President Goolsbee (FOMC non-voter) and Governor Bowman speak: Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee and Fed Governor Michelle Bowman will give opening remarks at a Fed Listens event focused on the childcare industry, working parents, and employers. Speech text is expected. On July 2, Goolsbee said, “we are on a path to 2%” inflation” and “if you just hold the rates where they are while inflation comes down, you are tightening—so you should do that by decision, not by default.” He added, “We got to this [federal funds] rate when inflation was over 4%, and inflation is now down close to 2.5%, so if you sit with the rate somewhere while inflation goes down you’re tightening. The reason that you would want to tighten is if you think that you’re not on a path to 2%.”
  • 07:30 PM Fed Governor Cook speaks: Fed Governor Lisa Cook will speak on global inflation and monetary policy challenges in Australia. Speech text and a Q&A are expected. On June 25, Cook said, “With significant progress on inflation and the labor market cooling gradually, at some point it will be appropriate to reduce the level of policy restriction to maintain a healthy balance in the economy…The timing of any such adjustment will depend on how economic data evolve and what they imply for the economic outlook and balance of risks.”

Thursday, July 11

  • 08:30 AM CPI (mom), June (GS +0.11%, consensus +0.1%, last flat); Core CPI (mom), June (GS +0.21%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.2%); CPI (yoy), June (GS +3.17%, consensus +3.1%, last +3.3%); Core CPI (yoy), June (GS +3.43%, consensus +3.4%, last +3.4%): We estimate a 0.21% increase in June core CPI (mom sa). Our forecast reflects a pullback in used car (-1.6%) and hotel lodging (-1.5%) prices and only a partial rebound in the car insurance category (+0.5%) based on decelerating premiums in our online dataset. However, we assume a modest rebound in new car prices (+0.2%), reflecting disruptions to dealer software systems and a (likely related) decline in incentives. We estimate a modestly slower pace of inflation in the housing measures (primary rent +0.36%; OER +0.39%). We estimate a 0.11% rise in headline CPI, reflecting lower energy (-1.0%) and flattish food (+0.1%) prices.
  • 08:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended July 6 (GS 233k, consensus 239k, last 238k); Continuing jobless claims, week ended June 29 (consensus 1,855k, last 1,858k)
  • 11:30 AM Atlanta Fed President Bostic (FOMC voter) speaks: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic will speak about economic inclusion in a moderated conversation at the National Credit Union Administration’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Summit. A Q&A is expected. On June 27, Bostic reiterated that he expects one rate cut this year in Q4 and said, “I think my reluctance [to cut rates] and my desire to be patient is that I think we need to be absolutely certain that we’re going to get back to that 2% target. And I don’t have that confidence right now.”
  • 01:00 PM St. Louis Fed President Musalem (FOMC non-voter) speaks: St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem will answer questions on the US economy and monetary policy in Little Rock, Arkansas. On June 18, Musalem said, “I will need to observe a period of favorable inflation, moderating demand and expanding supply before becoming confident that a reduction in the target range for the federal funds rate is appropriate. These conditions could take months, and more likely quarters to play out.”

Friday, July 12

  • 08:30 AM PPI final demand, June (GS +0.1%, consensus +0.1%, last -0.2%); PPI ex-food and energy, June (GS +0.1%, consensus +0.2%, last flat); PPI ex-food, energy, and trade, June (GS +0.1%, last flat)
  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, July preliminary (GS 66.2, consensus 68.2, last 68.2): University of Michigan 5-10-year inflation expectations, July preliminary (GS 2.9%, last 3.0%): We expect the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index decreased to 66.2 in the preliminary July reading, and we expect the report’s measure of long-term inflation expectations fell 0.1pp to 2.9%, reflecting lower gasoline prices and better (lower) inflation news.

Source: DB, BofA

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 10:35

Team Biden Goes On Monday Offensive, Declares “Firmly Committed To Staying In This Race”

Team Biden Goes On Monday Offensive, Declares “Firmly Committed To Staying In This Race”

Much to the chagrin of panicked Democrats, President Joe Biden isn’t going anywhere.

“I want you to know that despite all the speculation in the press and elsewhere, I am firmly committed to staying in this race, to running this race to the end, and to beating Donald Trump,” Biden ‘wrote’ in a Monday letter to congressional Democrats, undoubtedly penned by his cabal of unelected officials who can’t fathom releasing the ring of power.

“I have heard the concerns that people have … I am not blind to them,” the letter continues, adding “I wouldn’t be running again if I did not absolutely believe I was the best person to beat Donald Trump in 2024.”

The letter comes as Biden reportedly canceled a meeting with Senate Democrats led by Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA).

Meanwhile, five House Democrats have publicly called on Biden to drop out of the race, with several committee ranking members joining the call during a private call on Sunday, Axios reports.

  •     Many more Democrats have privately expressed the view that Biden needs to drop out, and an even larger group has voiced concerns about his ability to take on former President Trump.
  •     The Biden campaign’s efforts to address those concerns, largely by dismissing the president’s doubters, have stirred further discord among his fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill.

Biden, or someone who sounds like Biden, then reiterated his position in a Monday telephone interview with MSNBC.

No wait, it’s him:

Biden then took a few shots at Trump, reading all the things his team wishes he had the cognition to say in real time.

Meanwhile, Biden’s odds of winning the Democratic presidential nomination are spiking after this display of vigor.

To be continued…

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 10:15

“A Death Squad Ruling”: The Press And Pundits Make Wild Claims In The Wake Of The Court’s Immunity Decision

“A Death Squad Ruling”: The Press And Pundits Make Wild Claims In The Wake Of The Court’s Immunity Decision

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

Below is my column in The Hill on the over-wrought reaction to the Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States. Commentators seemed to compete for the most alarmist accounts from court-sanctioned death squads to political assassinations to the death of democracy. From the coverage of the immunity decision, one would think that the Madisonian Democracy was being replaced by a John Wick Republic. The academic and media accounts have little basis in the actual opinion. Despite the prediction of Rachel Maddow that this was a “Death Squad Ruling,” the only thing that seemed to die was objective reporting and commentary in the wake of the decision.

On MSNBC, Rachel Maddow warned that the Supreme Court had just unleashed death squads to roam our streets. CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen announced that murder was now legal (at least for presidents), while others predicted that the ruling on presidential immunity would invite “tyranny.” 

Anyone reading the coverage would conclude that James Madison has been replaced by John Wick in a new “Baba Yaga” Republic.

President Biden fueled the sense of panic in an address that repeated widespread false claims about the decision in Trump v. United States. Biden told the country that “for all practical purposes, today’s decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.”

That, of course, is not true.

I have long opposed sweeping presidential privileges and powers. I have long argued that a sitting president can be criminally charged in office. But the portrayal of this Supreme Court opinion by the left and the media is wildly off base.

As it has in the past, the court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer, in which the court ruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills.

In his famous concurrence to Youngstown, Justice Robert Jackson broke down the balance of executive and legislative authority between three types of actions. In the first, a president acts with express or implied authority from Congress. In the second, he acts where Congress is silent (“the zone of twilight” area). In the third, the president acts in defiance of Congress.

In this decision, the court adopted a similar sliding scale. It held that presidents enjoy absolute immunity for actions that fall within their “exclusive sphere of constitutional authority” while they enjoy presumptive immunity for other official acts. They do not enjoy immunity for unofficial or private actions.

The proceedings in Manhattan after the decision belie the claims that a president can now commit murder with impunity. Judge Juan Merchan is likely to find that Trump’s conduct in office in approving payments related to Stormy Daniels fall into the third, unprotected category. While some of the testimony may have intruded into protected areas, most experts anticipate that the court will reject dismissal of charges under an absolute immunity claim. Judges in the other Trump prosecutions will be performing the same inquiry, though the impact is likely to be much greater in the case of the special counsel in Washington, D.C.

In fairness to critics, Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent gave credence to their hyperbolic theories. Sotomayor wrote: “The president of the United States is the most powerful person in the country, and possibly the world. When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution. Orders the Navy’s SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”

The dissent ignores parts of the majority opinion that expressly refute such claims. For example, the majority discussed how prosecutors could present evidence in a bribery case that a president “allegedly demanded, received, accepted, or agreed to receive or accept in return for being influenced in the performance of the act.” The prosecution can overcome the presumption of immunity with such evidence.

Indeed, the majority stated that Trump’s alleged “private scheme with private actors” to create alternative slates of electors “cannot be neatly categorized as falling within a particular presidential function.” If that is established by the trial court, then Trump’s actions would not be protected by any sort of immunity.

In defining official functions, the Court referenced constitutional and statutory authority. It also recognized that a president must be able to speak to the public on matters of public interest, as Trump did on Jan. 6, 2021. While some of us believe that Trump’s speech was entirely protected under the First Amendment, the justices suggested that it was also protected as a matter of immunity.

That is a far cry from a green light for death squads. The idea that Trump could not order a slate of fake electors but could order a slew of political assassinations finds little support in the actual opinion.

Sotomayor is suggesting that the president could just declare that killing an opponent is in the national security interest. However, various laws contradict the claim that such acts are left to the discretion of the president. Not only would the military likely refuse such an unlawful order, but no court would consider it a core constitutional function.

The opinion draws lines with ample protection for presidents. The court cited opinions and practices going back decades for such breathing space.

Ironically, Biden’s hyperbolic account of the court’s opinion only serves to highlight the decision of former President Barack Obama and his vice president, Joe Biden, to kill an American citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, in a drone attack without a charge, let alone a conviction.

Former Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Obama administration’s “kill list” policy to a group of lawyers and judges at Northwestern University Law School and received not condemnation but applause. Under Holder, the Obama administration fought every effort of the al-Awlaki family to seek information on the killing and insisted that courts had no role to play in such cases.

Yet, in the wake of the immunity decision, Holder expressed shock at the implication of the presidential power.

Could Obama and Biden be charged with murder for what they did? Most say no, because they were acting in fulfillment of their national security authority. If so, could they simply declare a political opponent to be an enemy combatant? They actually did maintain, years before this Supreme Court opinion, that such a decision was left to them and figures such as Holder.

I likewise represented the House of Representatives in successfully challenging Obama’s spending billions under the Affordable Care Act that had not been approved by Congress. I also represented House members who contested Obama’s undeclared war in Libya. Could he be criminally charged for those actions?

Likewise, Biden as president has been repeatedly found to have violated the Constitution, exercising racial discrimination and seeking to excuse billions in debt illegally.

The court was trying to find a middle path in addressing such controversies. In doing so, it rejected the extreme arguments of both the Trump team and the lower courts.

Putting aside the three-tiered approach, even a finding of presidential immunity does not mean that, as Biden falsely claimed, “there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.” It only concerns when a president can be personally charged. Federal courts can enjoin presidents from unlawful conduct, Congress can investigate presidents under oversight authority, impeach them and remove them from office.

The decision does not bar any and all prosecutions of presidents. It is still true, as stated by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 65, that presidents remain subject to the criminal justice system. After impeachment and removal from office, he stressed, the president ”will still be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”

The opinion delineated those areas and evidence that may be barred from prosecution while allowing that prosecution is possible in other cases.

That nuance is lost in our current political environment. Biden and his allies spent months claiming that democracy will end and gay people will simply all be “disappeared” if he is defeated. So, there was admittedly little room left to escalate his rhetoric aside from death squads and a government based on a political “Assassin’s Creed.”

After all, these finer constitutional points are not nearly as riveting as the image of death squads roaming our streets. However, to paraphrase Mark Twain, the reports of democracy’s death are greatly exaggerated.

Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School and author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 09:55

Newsom’s California: Delivery Drivers Now Being Accompanied By Armed Guards Due To “Crime Concerns”

Newsom’s California: Delivery Drivers Now Being Accompanied By Armed Guards Due To “Crime Concerns”

Things have gotten so utopian in the state of California, delivery drivers are being accompanied by armed guards due to “crime concerns” while out making deliveries.

One company, Core Mart, has started hiring the guards to escort its drivers. Which means that somewhere, in a board room, it likely made more financial sense to pay for all new security staff than it did to continue to allow drivers to get robbed (and inventory lost) as was happening prior. 

California: sounds like a wonderful place to do business.

San Jose police reported a slight uptick in delivery truck robberies two years ago, but no recent surge has been observed, NBC Bay Area reported. 

Flavio Lopez, an employee of a different delivery company, expressed his desire for a guard or at least a second person to help monitor goods, telling NBC: 

“Stuff you gotta deal with downtown. It is what it is.”

Retired San Jose police officer Darrell Cortez, now working in corporate and retail security, said:

 “Unfortunately, this is what society has become now with armed guards guarding merchandise from the retailer because there seems to be a sense of lawlessness in our society.”

Cortez concluded:

 “It’s very unfortunate. You and I pay for it. The consumer pays for it on the backend because prices increase because the merchandise is going out the door and no one is stopping the bad guys because of the threat of violence.”

He noted that if one company was using the guards, others in the industry likely weren’t far behind from adopting the strategy. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 09:15

UK’s New Leftist PM Kills Illegal Immigrant Deportation Scheme On Day One

UK’s New Leftist PM Kills Illegal Immigrant Deportation Scheme On Day One

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

The new leftist British Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer has on day one of his premiership scrapped a scheme to deport illegal immigrants to Rwanda which was devised by the previous Conservative government but never properly implemented.

Starmer’s Labour party had promised to kill off the ill conceived mess of a ‘solution’ to hordes of small boat migrants washing up on English shores, and he has indeed done so, reports the Telegraph.

The Rwanda scheme was first touted by Boris Johnson’s government, then continued to be bandied around under subsequent Prime Ministers Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak. However, it was proven to be toothless empty rhetoric, with not one single illegal immigrant being deported under the program.

Despite that, British taxpayers were charged to the tune of £270 million… for nothing.

The Labour government’s new Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, has declared that one of the first duties will be to “keep our borders secure” and that she would prioritise creating a new Border Security Command.

No one is holding their breath though, given that the leftist Party is extremely pro immigration.

Still, things surely cannot get any worse than under the last Conservative government, which made Tony Blair’s relaxed immigration policy look positively isolationist.

Labour won the UK election this past week with an estimated vote share of just 34 percent, yet they now have 64 percent of the parliamentary seats under the first past the post political system.

All in all, around 80 per cent of UK citizens did not vote for this Labour government:

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 06:30

Chinese Ship Suspected Of Raiding World War II Wrecks Detained

Chinese Ship Suspected Of Raiding World War II Wrecks Detained

By John Grady of USNI News

The Chinese dredger suspected of plundering two World War II Royal Navy shipwrecks last year has been detained by Malaysian maritime authorities.

MV Chaun Hong 68 before it was detained by Malaysian authorities on July 1, 2024. Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency Photo

MV Chuan Hong 68 and the entire crew is being held for paperwork violations including port clearances and having 60 unregistered LPG containers aboard and not illegal scavenging, according to a report in Maritime Executive.

But the larger question being raised by Southeast Asia news media and investigated by local authorities is how a ship like Chuan Hong 68 with its “bad reputation” that goes back years even be allowed to return to Malaysian waters.

Kuala Lampur’s New Straits Times reported Malaysian investigators are looking into why and by what means Chuan Hong 68 was issued permits to carry out salvage operations on MV Armada in February and a wreck identified as “Maritime Fidelity” in September last year, both off Johor.

The dredger’s suspected plundering of the two warships for its steel, aluminum and brass fittings took place in May 2023. Since these metals were produced before nuclear weapons’ use and testing they are considered of great value in highly specialized manufacturing.

During the May 2023 boarding of the Chuan Hong 68, inspectors found rusting artillery shells and other scrap that likely came from the two warships. Shortly after that boarding, Malaysian authorities confiscated two cannons, more ordnance and other objects in a junkyard that also likely came from sunken warships.

Malaysian authorities detain the crew of MV Chaun Hong 68 on July 1, 2024. Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency Photo

The newspaper’s account said both “notices to mariners” that salvage operations were being conducted had been deleted from the country’s maritime posting website. These notices are also guides to authorities to what vessels are operating in their territorial waters.

Local police, Malaysia’s National Heritage Department and its Maritime Enforcement Agency and Marine Department are also participating in the investigation as to how the permits were granted and their purging from the website.

In May last year before the second salvaging operations began, Malaysian authorities detained Chuan Hong 68 in the same waters for allegedly crushing and removing the wreckage of the Royal Navy battleship HMS Prince of Wales and battlecruiser HMS Repulse, USNI News reported.

Both were sunk by Japanese bombers during the invasion of the Malay Peninsula in December 1941, days after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

USNI News’ account noted the illegal salvage operation in Malaysia showed how vulnerable historic heritage sites are to thieves intent on plundering war graves, the director general of the Museum of the Royal Navy said in a statement.

The Royal Navy termed the dredging of the historic wreckage site “disgraceful.” Eight-hundred forty crew members lost their lives in the attack carried out by Japanese bombers.

USNI News reported six years ago that the U.K. Ministry of Defense was so concerned over the illegal dredging of wreckage sites, scavenging and looting that it dispatched a task force of survey vessels to the region to investigate the wrecks’ status. The ministry said then it would also monitor the water by satellite to keep track of activity near the sites.

South East Asian news media are reporting this week Chuan Hong 68 is also suspected of illegal shipwreck salvaging of Dutch warships in Indonesia in the Java Sea, as well as Singapore, Cambodia and Vietnam.

Malaysian authorities have not released an update on the case over the course of the intervening 12 months since the suspected scavenging of the two Royal Navy ships. The New Stairs Times also reported Chuan Hong 68 has repeatedly returned to the same operating area northeast of the Singapore Strait, often disappearing from the marine Automatic Identification System for weeks at a time.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 05:45

Germany AfD Members Banned From Owning Guns In New Court Ruling

Germany AfD Members Banned From Owning Guns In New Court Ruling

By Denes Albert of RMX.news

A new court ruling in Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia, bans Alternative for Germany (AfD) members from owning firearms. The judges from the Düsseldorf Administrative Court said their ruling was based on the classification of Germany’s domestic intelligence service, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), which listed the party as a “suspected” threat to democracy.

The case was initially brought by a married couple that owned over 200 firearms and held a legal permit to do so. Their permit was, however, revoked due to their membership in the AfD. The couple initially sued and lost this case. However, they have now also lost their appeal, as the court argues that members of the party are suspected of anti-constitutional activities and therefore “unreliable” based on current gun laws, according to the court.

The court’s ruling means the married couple must either hand over their firearms to the authorities or destroy them, as well as any ammunition. The husband owns 197 firearms, while the wife owns 27. However, the court is still allowing the case to move forward on appeal to the highest court in the state, the Münster Higher Administrative Court, “due to (the case’s) fundamental importance.”

According to the latest court ruling, the judges said that the ban on weapons for AfD members does not violate the party privilege provided for in Article 21 of the German constitution, known as the Basic Law.

Earlier this year, that same Münster court already confirmed the BfV’s classification of the AfD as a “suspected threat” to democracy after the AfD challenged this classification.

The BfV is a highly politicized intelligence agency targeting domestic “threats” to the constitutional order, while critics contend it is designed to snuff out political opposition. The agency is currently monitoring AfD members in a number of states, including tapping their phones and surveilling their internet communications, all without a warrant. Currently, their membership in the party offers enough legal grounds to target what is the second-largest party in the country.

Continue reading at rmx.news

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 05:00

Burberry’s Turnaround Plan Falters, Prepares Job Cuts; Goldman Believes Brand In “M&A Sweet Spot”

Burberry’s Turnaround Plan Falters, Prepares Job Cuts; Goldman Believes Brand In “M&A Sweet Spot”

Burberry struggles to revitalize its business through a turnaround plan. The high-end, UK-based luxury clothing company, known for its signature beige check pattern, is failing to resonate with consumers, especially Chinese ones. 

Last week, Goldman’s Louise Singlehurst told clients that the troubled designer has a “lack of catalysts for top-line stability” and remains “Neutral” on the company. 

In mid-June, Singlehurst said that even with Burberry’s leather goods more accessible at entry-level price segments compared to luxury peers, recent price reductions on new handbags and clothing still suggest a challenging sales environment: 

Looking at our pricing analysis, we show that Burberry’s leather goods offer has greater exposure to more entry level price segments when benchmarked versus the luxury peers (it has the largest offer of handbags below €1500). In addition we show the brand is targeting the higher priced segment with new product launches (adding to the €2000+ segment and now the €3,000+) over the past 18 months. However, our pricing tracker shows price reductions on a small selection of new handbag silhouettes (using data from June 5th versus April 30th) which are designs introduced by new Creative Director (Daniel Lee). We have observed only a small selection of price adjustments (5 styles, mainly within the Knight Bag and Rocking Horse designs) with a range of -4% to -16% in Euro and GBP (with the medium-sized Knight Bag in black leather seeing the largest reduction at -16% to £2,090). Whilst this does suggest that Burberry is actively reviewing its product offer and pricing architecture – a positive in our view – it does also suggest the sales environment remains challenging and Burberry is yet to reverse market share losses.

In May, CEO Jonathan Akeroyd told investors, “FY24 financial results underperformed our original expectations.” 

Revenue has been sliding in the Chinese market, and that suggests consumers in the world’s second-biggest economy are giving up on the brand’s overpriced handbags and jackets. 

“The Burberry brand doesn’t have, at the moment, the ability to resonate,” Luca Solca, a senior analyst at Bernstein Autonomous LLP, said, adding, “It either needs to change or it needs to work.”

As The Telegraph reports this weekend, that change involves hundreds of potential job cuts as the turnaround plan falters. 

As many as 400 jobs could be at risk. Here’s more from the report:

Employees were first informed of the restructuring during a Zoom meeting in late June, with affected workers told they were either facing redundancy or having to reapply for their roles. The company has begun a 45-day consultation, signalling that hundreds of roles could be cut.

It is understood that union officials are coordinating redundancy settlements with a select group of employees. The company refused to say how many workers will be affected, but employees fear up to 400 jobs could be at risk.

Bloomberg data shows that Burberry has about 9,200 full-time workers, which provides some context on what the upcoming job cuts mean for the workforce as a whole. 

Solca said, “One can only think that the Burberry reinvention has yet to succeed.”

He noted that Burberry’s low valuation, compared to that of its peers, could attract M&A activity. 

A “buyer could undertake the grisly but arguably necessary measures to stabilize the Burberry brand away from the prying eyes of the public markets,” he said.

Goldman’s Singlehurst told clients last week that Burberry could be ripe for M&A with larger brands:

Small listed brands now in an M&A sweet spot: In the last 15 years, small brands (BRBY, SFER, ZGN) are trading at the largest discount relative to brand scale (12mf EV/GP or EV/Sales basis) vs. larger cap peers. We believe the market has been trading these businesses on standalone profitability, which is under increasing pressure, rather than factoring in M&A risk and earnings at scale. We use Tiffany/LVMH (completed Jan-21) as a case study to see how larger fashion houses can drive operational improvements in standalone businesses (noting recent consolidation e.g. CFR/Vhernier, L Cat./Tods, KER/Creed, KER/ 30% Valentino).

None of this should be surprising, as high inflation and rising interest rates weigh on consumer activity worldwide. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 04:15

China’s Rapid Renewables Rollout Hits Grid Limits

China’s Rapid Renewables Rollout Hits Grid Limits

By John Kemp, senior energy analyst at Reuters

China’s record-breaking deployment of wind and solar capacity has worsened regional power imbalances, forcing the country to idle increasing amounts of renewable generation when it overwhelms local consumption.

New government regulations aim to reduce the amount of renewable generation that has to be abandoned by increasing long-distance transmission links and better coordinating generation plans across provinces.

Since the end of 2018, China’s total generating capacity has increased by 1.137 billion kilowatts (kW), compound annual growth of 9%, according to data from the National Bureau of statistics (NBS).

Thermal capacity, mainly from coal-fired plants but some from gas-fired generators, rose by 257 million kW or 4% per year (“China statistical yearbook”, NBS, 2023).

Most capacity additions, however, have come from what the government calls “new energy sources” – wind farms (277 million kW, 19% per year) and solar generators (517 million kW, 29% per year). Increased penetration of intermittent renewables is making it harder to manage a nationwide transmission system that was already struggling with large regional imbalances between generation and load.

The solution to variable wind and solar output is to smooth out fluctuations across a larger number of generators spread over much larger areas of the country, which will require more transmission and better scheduling.

Long-Distance Transmission

For decades, the country has been characterized by massive west-to-east electricity transfers from interior areas with surplus generation to the massive load centres on the east and south coasts.  Ten provincial-level areas in the east and south (Liaoning, Hebei, Beijing, Tianjin, Shandong, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Fujian and Guangdong) accounted for 50% of national consumption but only 40% of generation in 2022.

By contrast, six remote and sparsely populated northern and western areas (Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia) accounted for 18% of consumption but 25% of generation.

Chartbook: China regional electricity transfers

In response, China’s State Grid Corporation has constructed a network of ultra-high voltage transmission lines to move power thousands of kilometres from surplus areas in the west and north to deficit areas in the east and south.

In the process, China has become the world leader in ultra-high voltage transmission to move electricity over long distances while minimising line losses and is exporting its expertise around the world.

Inner Asia’s Energy Abundance

China’s northern and western areas are some of the least populated and poorest parts of the country, but rich in energy resources, traditionally coal but now increasingly gas and renewables.

The north and west contains the country’s most important coal deposits and has become a major centre of pit-head generation, with some electricity used locally by heavy industry, and the rest transmitted east and south.

Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Shaanxi and Xinjiang alone accounted for 81% of coal mine production and 25% of all thermal generation in 2022, according to data from the NBS.

In a quirk of fate, the arid and windswept northern and western plains and deserts are also the best sites for giant wind farms and solar parks.

Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Shaanxi and Xinjiang together with neighbouring Gansu, Ningxia and Qinghai accounted for 42% of all wind and solar generation last year.

But the addition of so much wind and solar generation in a region already saturated with coal-fired power threatens to overwhelm the transmission system.

During peak periods of wind and solar generation, there is not enough population and industry in these areas to absorb all the output, and not enough long-distance transmission capacity to move the surplus east and south.

More Transmission And Planning

In 2016, the national utilisation rate for new energy sources fell to a record low of 84%, prompting the central government to launch a “Clean Energy Absorption Action Plan” to reduce the waste of renewable resources. The plan focused on improvements in local distribution, long-distance inter-provincial transmission, and energy trading to reduce the curtailment of new energy generation.

By 2023, the utilisation rate for wind power had climbed to a remarkable 97.3% and solar had reached 98%, according to the state-run news agency Xinhua.

With rapid deployment of renewable capacity, however, the problem of abandonment is re-emerging, with wind utilisation down  to 96.1% and solar down to 96% in the first five months of 2024. Sliding utilisation has prompted an alert from the National New Energy Consumption Monitoring and Early Warning Center (“Solving the pain points and difficulties of new energy consumption”, Xinhua, July 1, 2024).

The response is likely to be similar, with renewed emphasis on integrating renewables at local level and more transmission  capacity to move surplus power across provincial boundaries. In the last two years, central government policy statements have repeatedly focused on the need for better coordination of transmission and generation between provinces.

Creating A Truly National System

In a sign of the importance attached to the issue, the Communist Party’s Politburo held a group study session on new energy technology and energy security on February 29, 2024. The session, bringing together top central and regional leaders, included a discussion on boosting “the grid’s capacity capability to integrate, distribute and regulate clean energy.”

President Xi Jinping stressed need for “coordinated development of the energy sector” (“Xi stresses high-quality development of new energy”, CPC International Department, March 2, 2024).

In many ways, China’s long-distance ultra-high voltage transmission system is an extraordinary engineering achievement, likely to be copied in other parts of the world as more and more renewables are connected to grids. It has enabled a remarkable penetration of intermittent renewables, as well as hydroelectric generation, into the national power system while maintaining or improving reliability. As a result, wind and solar producers supplied 15% of all generation in the first five months of 2024, up from 7% in the same period in 2019.

In some ways, however, China is still struggling to forge a truly integrated nationwide system from fragmented provincial-level utilities that pursue their own priorities. If government plans to achieve even higher renewables penetration are to be achieved, there will have to be much closer links and more coordination between different types of generators and across far wider areas.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 07/08/2024 – 02:45