65.8 F
Chicago
Sunday, September 20, 2026
Home Blog Page 2764

Google Eyes Paid AI Search Features, Explores Subscription Model; Report

Google Eyes Paid AI Search Features, Explores Subscription Model; Report

Authored by Amaka Nwaokocha via CoinTelegraph.com,

Google is considering introducing premium features powered by generative artificial intelligence (AI) in its search engine.

The move would mark the first time a core Google product is behind a paywall. However, the free search experience with advertisements will still be available.

According to a Financial Times report on April 3, the tech giant is looking at a variety of options, including incorporating AI-powered search features to its premium subscription services, which already provide access to its new Gemini AI assistant in Gmail and Docs.

Google mainly relies on advertising for monetization. The company already offers various plans, such as the Gemini AI assistant in Gmail and Docs.

However, these subscriptions currently do not enhance the search experience. The company’s main product, Google Search, has been free since its launch in the early 2000s. However, the tech giant might be exploring different means of monetization.

The report added that Google’s traditional search engine would remain free of charge and that ads would continue to appear alongside search results even for subscribers.

With the recent competition in AI, most tech companies have tried to bring more products to the market.

Google started trialing its AI-driven search tool, combining tailored narratives with web links and advertisements. Yet integration into the primary search engine lags due to delayed feature adoption from its experimental “search generative experience.”

However, AI queries demand more computing power, which ultimately is costly compared to general queries. Therefore, it may not be profitable if Google brings its “Search Generative Experience” for free.

A spokesperson from Google said that the company has no plans for an ad-free search experience: 

“We’re not working on or considering an ad-free search experience. As we’ve done many times before, we’ll continue to build new premium capabilities and services to enhance our subscription offerings across Google.”

In February, Google added a new paid tier to its consumer subscription service that gives people access to its latest AI model, Gemini.

Users who pay for the subscription, called Google One AI Premium, can use the advanced Gemini chatbot and access the generative AI model in popular services such as Gmail and Google Docs.

Google, credited with pioneering the technology underlying the current AI surge, finds itself embroiled in competition with two prominent industry players: OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, and Microsoft, its supporter.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 15:05

Trump Throws Support Behind Push To Switch Nebraska To Winner-Take-All Elector System

Trump Throws Support Behind Push To Switch Nebraska To Winner-Take-All Elector System

Authored by Ryan Morgan via The Epoch Times,

Former President Donald Trump is cheering an effort, led by Republicans in Nebraska, to switch the state’s electoral college system to a purely winner-take-all contest.

Nebraska is currently one of two U.S. states that award some of their presidential electors to the winner of district-level contests, with Maine being the other state to follow a similar model. The 48 other states prefer a system where all presidential electors are awarded to the candidate who garners the most votes state-wide.

Last year, Republican Nebraska state Sen. Loren Lippincott introduced a bill, LB 764, that would move Nebraska back to a purely winner-take-all electoral college system.

Mr. Lippincott’s legislation now appears to be gaining momentum. On Tuesday, Republican Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen released a statement throwing his support behind LB 764, urging the state’s unicameral legislature to support its passage.

“I am a strong supporter of Senator Lippincott’s winner-take-all bill (LB 764) and have been from the start. It would bring Nebraska into line with 48 of our fellow states, better reflect the founders’ intent, and ensure our state speaks with one unified voice in presidential elections,” Mr. Pillen’s statement reads.

“I call upon fellow Republicans in the Legislature to pass this bill to my desk so I can sign it into law.”

Nebraska’s legislature is officially nonpartisan, but Republicans comprise a majority of its members.

President Trump, the 2016 and 2020 Republican presidential nominee and prospective 2024 Republican nominee, also threw his support behind Nebraska’s efforts to adopt a winner-take-all electoral college system.

“Governor Jim Pillen of Nebraska, a very smart and popular Governor, who has done some really great things, came out today with a very strong letter in support of returning Nebraska’s Electoral Votes to a Winner-Take-All System. Most Nebraskans have wanted to go back to this system for a very long time, because it’s what 48 other States do—It’s what the Founders intended, and it’s right for Nebraska,” President Trump said in a post on his Truth Social account on Tuesday.

“Thank you Governor for your bold leadership. Let’s hope the Senate does the right thing. Nebraskans, respectfully ask your Senators to support this Great Bill!”

Republicans Could Benefit From Reform

Under the U.S. electoral college system, states are given a number of electors equal to the number of U.S. Senators and House members from that state’s delegation. Senators are elected in state-wide contests, while House members are selected in district-level contests.

Nebraska’s electoral college method assigns two of its presidential electors based on the state-wide winner of the presidential election. Nebraska’s three remaining presidential electors are awarded in contests that take place within its three U.S. House districts.

Republican presidential candidates have historically won the majority of votes in state-wide contests in Nebraska. In fact, the Republican presidential candidate has won a clear majority of Nebraska voters in every presidential election since 1968.

While Republicans have historically been the clear favorite in Nebraska’s state-level contests, Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District has sometimes presented itself as more of a battleground. Republicans have swept all of Nebraska’s district-level elector contests in all but two presidential elections since 1968.

President Barack Obama won the presidential elector from Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District in the 2008 election, while Republican presidential candidate and senator John McCain won the state-wide contest and the district-level elector contests in Nebraska’s 1st and 3rd Congressional Districts.

Voters in Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District swung back to the Republican presidential candidate in the 2012 and 2016 elections, allowing those Republicans to win a clean sweep of the state’s electors during those two presidential elections.

While President Trump swept all of Nebraska’s electoral contests in 2016, President Joe Biden won the electoral contest in Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District during the 2020 election.

If Nebraska’s state-wide trend of support for Republican presidential candidates continues, and if Mr. Lippincott’s bill becomes law, Republican presidential candidates could expect to win an additional elector going forward.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 13:05

Stellar Blade: Woke Activists Enraged By Video Games With Attractive Female Characters

Stellar Blade: Woke Activists Enraged By Video Games With Attractive Female Characters

Recently we covered the exposure of leftist activist run “consulting firms” that have been discreetly involved in the widespread wokification of the video games industry.  These firms have been know to operate on a protection racket-like model:  They threaten video game developers with the cancel-culture mob unless they hire said firm to “fix” their games for them.  This fixing usually involves a host of DEI requirements, from forced diversity to the inclusion of LGBT related propaganda for the kiddies.

The reason these consulting outfits exist is singular – They do not care about games, gaming or gamers.  In fact, they seem to hate game consumers with a passion.  Their only purpose is to inject as much woke ideology as possible into an industry they know has immense influence on the next generation.  Leftists see video games as a platform to manipulate the collective thinking of the future.

One agenda which has been incredibly important to them is their war on the “male gaze” and western beauty standards in general.  The reasons for this are varied. 

Some activists believe that men should not be allowed to set standards for women in any form, even though women set standards frequently for men.  Biological imperatives and inherent attractions for men are treated as “toxic aggression” that needs to be snuffed out.

Other activists argue that beauty representations in popular media are “unattainable” and cause young girls and women to have a negative sense of self worth.  In reality, many beauty standards are perfectly attainable through self improvement, but this is a violation of the “beauty at any size” cult as well as claims by feminists that attractiveness is nothing more than a social construct.

Perhaps traditional beauty is attainable for most women – It’s just not attainable for feminists.

Then there are those people that want to completely subvert what it is to be a woman.  The trans movement is distinctly aware of depictions of women in pop culture and they have sought to make females appear more masculine wherever possible.  Why?  Maybe because they believe this will speed up the acceptance of trans women (men) as “real women.”  If movies or video games are saturated with manly looking women then the concept of natural femininity could be lost, at least in theory.   

This problem in particular has become pervasive in video games, with ugly female characters becoming the mainstay.  The trend has not been overlooked by the gaming community, though anyone asking for more attractive women in games is immediately attacked for “misogyny.”  

The proof that this is an agenda is revealed not only the the horse-like faces of modern female game characters but the way in which activists attack companies that choose not to follow the trend and make attractive characters instead.  This has been the case with the impending launch of a new version of a classic Sony Playstation title called Stellar Blade.  

South Korean developer Shift Up produced the game which includes a busty female protagonist complete with pleasant feminine facial features and “jiggle physics.”  Social Justice Warriors responded with outrage and leftist gaming journalists including those at IGN France suggested that the character was the “sexualized” fantasy of “someone who has never seen a woman”.

IGN was forced to apologize to Shift Up after it was revealed that the character was in fact designed by a woman.

The cult of ugly is obviously not limited to gaming.  The recent announcement of a new film version of Romeo and Juliet revealed final casting decisions, including Tom Holland and Amewudah-Rivers.  Decide for yourself which one will play Romeo and which one will play Juliet.

The progressive takeover of pop culture and the decision to erase femininity from media is not only an exercise in subverting the male gaze and adding “variety” to depictions of women; it’s also an exercise in subverting consumer demand and the free market.  If this was only about representation, then they would not be so hostile to the occasional female character that fits the traditional mold of attractiveness.  However, they can’t tolerate even one girl with jiggle physics.  The existence of Stellar Blade, for them, is unacceptable. 

They believe that consumers should not be allowed to dictate the market.  Rather, they think they should be the arbiters of everything we see and hear.  And for some reason activists really want to surround us with as much ugly as possible.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 12:45

Armstrong: Why Are Central Banks Buying Gold?

Armstrong: Why Are Central Banks Buying Gold?

Authored by Martin Armstrong via ArmstrongEconomics.com,

Investors’ curiosity has peaked as central banks are increasing their gold purchases.

We are not going back to a Bretton Woods type situation and that is not the issue.

You must understand that gold is neutral. Central banks are buying gold because the Neocons have weaponized the dollar.

Russia was removed from the SWIFT system, and private citizens’ assets were confiscated.

When Russian assets were removed from SWIFT, a threat to the world was issued to say, “Hey, if you don’t do what we tell you to do, we will take you out of SWIFT.”

This is not the end of the dollar.

Money continues to pour into US equities, particularly the Dow. Why? When the drum of war is beating, major institutions rush to move their money into a safe haven, which happens to be the US at this point in time.

The big money is not purchasing start-up equities on the Nasdaq, for example, as they will not take that risk. Our computer model indicates the Dow will continue rising into 2032 as it remains one of the last safe havens.

The West has become extremely aggressive in its geopolitics. You simply do not buy the debt of your enemy. Central banks are buying gold because the USD is political.

There is a stark difference between short-term and long-term bonds.

The central banks have zero control over the short-term and that is how this whole QE fiasco began as central banks began purchasing long-term debt in an attempt to reduce long-term interest. Why would you buy long-term when war, the primary driver of inflation, is looming?

This is a serious situation that the neocons who have weaponized the dollar simply do not understand.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 12:25

“Is He Blackmailed?” MTG Questions Speaker Johnson’s ‘Complete Departure’ Over Abortion, Illegals, DOJ Funding

“Is He Blackmailed?” MTG Questions Speaker Johnson’s ‘Complete Departure’ Over Abortion, Illegals, DOJ Funding

Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) suggested that House Speaker Mike Johnson is being “blackmailed” because of his “complete departure” from Republican concerns, saying the Louisiana Republican “has completely changed his character.”

“Mike Johnson has completely changed his character in a matter of about five months after he has become speaker of the House,” Greene told Tucker Carlson in a recent episode of Tucker Carlson Uncensored.

Carlson pointed to Johnson’s meeting with Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky – after which Johnson said that the second congressional recess ends, “his number one priority at a moment when the U.S. is being invaded” is to ” send that $60 billion to Ukraine, possibly as a loan.”

According to Carlson, Johnson won’t come on his show to explain, while Zelensky also refused to discuss his position:

They’re not grateful now. So we sent a message to the speaker of the House and asked him to come on and explain why, when the majority of the Republicans he represents both the voters and members of Congress, opposes why he would join with Democrats to do the one thing that Americans don’t think we should do, which is send another $60 billion to pay the pensions of Ukrainian bureaucrats and fund a doomed war. Why are you for that? And of course, he hasn’t responded. We also sent multiple requests to Zelensky himself for an interview to explain his position. Of course, he ignored that as well.

Greene echoed Tucker’s concerns, saying “It’s outrageous.”

When you saw Zelenskyy right there on that interview talking about, oh, we’re going to lose territory. Oh, we really need this money. This $60 billion should have been approved yesterday. Let me tell you, we are losing our country to the illegal invasion that’s happening every single day at our southern border. And I am so pissed off about it because the American people are pissed off about it. And while our so-called Republican speaker of the House is only working with Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries and Ukraine First Mitch McConnell and the white House and Jake Sullivan, who he talks to on the phone all the time. We are angry and people have had it.

Greene said this “needs to end,” but Johnson “has has made a complete departure of who he is, and what he stands for and to the point where people are literally asking, is he blackmailed?

When Carlson asked her to expound, Greene said that she has “no idea” if that’s the case, but asks: “What radically changes a man. I mean, if we break down the the second part of basically an omnibus, let’s let’s break that down.”

Greene cited Johnson’s funding of “full term abortion clinics” despite being pro-life, doing “nothing for the southern border” – particularly on the heels of Laken Riley’s murder at the hands of an illegal, which followed “a video that was running on loop on social media, where illegal aliens had rushed our border, ran over Texas National Guard.”

He did nothing to secure the border. It’s the number one issue in the world. He completely changed who he was. Funded the FBI, gave them a brand new building, fully funded the Department of Justice that is persecuting everyone on the right and actually targeting our presidential candidate, for for election this year. Literally trying to put him in jail the rest of his life. We don’t know who Mike Johnson is anymore. So there’s no, I can’t comprehend it,” Greene continued.

Watch:

And watch the entire interview below:

Meanwhile, you can support Tucker Carlson by subscribing to the Tucker Carlson Network if you haven’t done so already. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 12:05

Bitcoin Futures Markets Signal ‘Prime Buying’ Opportunity Soon

Bitcoin Futures Markets Signal ‘Prime Buying’ Opportunity Soon

Authored by Martin Young via CoinTelegraph.com,

Bitcoin futures funding rates – periodic payments made between short and long traders – may be signaling a potential price correction for Bitcoin in the future, which could present “prime buying opportunities,” according to market analysts. 

In a post shared on X on April 3, an analyst from on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant reported that record-long positive Bitcoin futures funding rates are signalling “strong bullish sentiment.”

Futures funding rates are the periodic payments that traders pay each other based on the difference between the price of the perpetual futures contract and the spot price of bitcoin.

If the Bitcoin futures prices trade above the spot prices, longs pay shorts the funding rate. Conversely, if the futures price trades below the spot, shorts pay longs the funding rate.

Bitcoin funding rates. Source: Crypto Quant

However, “historically, such optimism precedes price corrections,” said analyst’ Crypto SunMoon,’ before adding:

“A subsequent drop may offer a prime buying opportunity.”

CryptoQuant analyst ‘Maartunn’ also observed a rising Coinbase Premium, which he said was “a sign of U.S. institutions actively buying Bitcoin.”

This premium is the price difference between Coinbase compared to global exchanges.

[ZH: Related to this funding rate is the fact that Hedge funds and CTAs currently hold record bearish wagers (in futures) on the bitcoin price…

The record buildup in short positions likely reflects hedge funds’ renewed interest in the carry trade, according to Markus Thielen, CEO of 10x Research.

“There is a massive demand from hedge funds to put on carry trades. Despite bitcoin’s -10% decline from the all-time high, the futures premium has remained in double digits, and hedge funds are taking advantage of these high rates,” Thielen told CoinDesk in an interview.

That said, CoinDesk notes that some hedge funds may have taken outright bearish bets as recent robust U.S. economic data and hawkish comments from the Fed officials weakened the case for rapid-fire interest-rate cuts in the near term.

Still, while the massive short-length of hedge funds is unprecedented, the record-long-length of institutional investors is just as remarkable…

Who has the most leverage to unwind if things turn against them?

Additionally, bitcoin’s market dynamics appear to have fundamentally changed with the advent of US spot BTC ETFs…]

…and that could shift the market’s perceived reaction the upcoming ‘halving’.]

Earlier this week, crypto derivatives tooling provider Greeks Live said that Bitcoin’s continued decline was “driving the crypto market down significantly, with panic spreading across the market and futures premium levels falling.”

BTC has fallen around 9% over the past week, hitting a low just below $65,000 on April 2. It currently stands 10.5% below its March 14 all-time high of $73,738 and it could drop further, according to IG market analyst Tony Sycamore.

In an April 4 post on X, the analyst predicted a drop to support at around $60,000, or possibly lower.

“Tuesday’s sell-off increases the likelihood that BTC is undertaking another leg lower (into support at $60/58k) to complete a three-wave correction from the $73,794 high before the uptrend toward $80,000 resumes.”

BTC/USD with 200-day SMA. Source: Tony Sycamore

Analyst and trader ‘Moustache’ told his 112,000 followers on X “It’s completely normal that we see some correction around the ATH of BTC.”

It was the same in 2020, he said before adding, “After that, the ATH was broken with force and a legendary bull run continued.”

BTC pulled back around 17% dropping to around $61,500 a week after its all-time high, it then recovered to reclaim $71,500 in late March, before retreating again in April.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 11:45

“Urban Doom Loop” Of Vacant Offices: How Far Will It Go?

“Urban Doom Loop” Of Vacant Offices: How Far Will It Go?

Via SchiffGold.com,

Even the mainstream is starting to acknowledge the massive problem of vacant office buildings littering American cities, slowly turning them into post-Covid wastelands. While a few pundits are claiming (in somewhat Orwellian fashion) that the surge in empty commercial real estate is actually a chance for a utopian turnaround in the ashes of Covid weirdness, the potential for an “Urban Doop Loop” triggered by CRE is now being widely acknowledged as a possible trigger for a broader economic meltdown.

With a pre-existing problem amplified drastically by COVID-19 and then set in stone, the rising office vacancy rate has no real solution. The problem is slowly and steadily getting worse, becoming a “new normal” that simply can’t go on forever without further economic repercussions. And this time is distinct from other major downturns in that during previous shocks, like 9/11 and the 2008 financial crisis, everyone more or less agreed that eventually, things would pick back up again. This time, it’s permanent.

Take just a few examples:

New York — There’s a new record for office vacancies in Manhattan, which have risen above 17%, and show no signs of slowing down. Vacancies have grown 70% in Manhattan since Covid (growing 20% nationally in the same period), with the Financial District hardest hit.

Pittsburgh — Currently sitting above 20% vacant, or 27% if you factor in subleases, it’s estimated that nearly half of the city’s commercial real estate could be empty within four years. If not reversed, a local crisis (at the very least) seems all but assured.

Portland — With the highest office vacancy rate in the nation — a mind-melting 30% or more — Portland officials are offering desperate pleas in the form of tax credits and other incentives to fill its deserted commercial buildings.

Los Angeles — Demand is so low for commercial real estate that, in one case, developers abandoned plans to build a shiny new 61-story office tower in place of an empty commercial building. Instead, they demolished it and installed a handful of EV charging stations.

There’s no great solution. Most cities are floating quixotic proposals to turn empty offices into apartments to “fix” the crisis, but this is often too expensive to be practical and requires navigating lots of bureaucratic red tape, like changes to zoning laws.

Recognizing how dependent their cities are on property taxes harvested from commercial real estate, getting municipal governments to change zoning laws actually might be the easiest part. Vacant office buildings equate to plummeting revenue, forcing cities to make up the loss by increasing taxes elsewhere or reducing spending.

For one, New York City’s commercial real estate accounts for 20% of the property tax and 10% of overall revenue, with the city comptroller projecting a $1.1 billion shortfall from vacant offices in 2024. In Boston, property taxes on office buildings comprise a staggering 22% of total revenue.

Even the most optimistic, desperately trying to see this crisis as an “opportunity” to start fresh, are being forced to acknowledge the challenges. But turning commercial spaces into residential ones and hoping for the best is one of the only few “Hail Mary” options cities have left to avoid a further implosion that bleeds into the banking sector and sets off a chain reaction.

For the hopeful, such as Dana Lind of the Penn Institute for Urban Research, the buyer’s market in big cities provides a golden opportunity that was missed during the 2008 crisis. She hopes local buyers will use these empty buildings to invigorate cities by serving local needs, or that the empty offices will be bought by cities themselves and turned into vibrant community centers:

“Smart investors see what is happening in American downtowns four years out from the onset of the pandemic—the business fundamentals of cities like New York, Boston, or Houston are relatively stable and could even dramatically improve. Why not buy?”

Sure, fundamentals could improve. But will they? She goes on to say:

“As commercial properties fall into foreclosure in 2024, cities could take steps to better shape the city they want in the future by actually investing in those properties themselves.”

It all sounds lovely. Unfortunately, I’m less confident the CRE crisis can be contained this way, and that it won’t contribute to a broader meltdown.

Empty offices mean fewer people visiting the surrounding stores and restaurants. As the economic damage begins to snowball, the domino effect eventually reaches the banking sector, especially smaller and mid-size banks — and thus, the “Doom Loop” takes form. If we are to take the recent failure of regional firms like New York Community Bancorp as evidence, this vicious spiral may already be beginning.

CBS reported in January that office loan delinquencies were up a shocking four times compared to the previous year. In under two years, commercial real estate loans totaling $1.5 trillion are due to expire, portending disaster for the economy when the bill comes due and office owners can’t pay it. According to data from the St. Louis Fed, delinquency rates on commercial real estate loans have already ticked above their Covid peak:

Occupancy Rate on CRE Loans (Excluding Farmland), Booked in Domestic Offices, Q3 2019 to Q3 2023

In an industry that lives and dies by interest rates, the problem provides another powerful source of pressure on the Fed to cut rates this year, boosting the bottom line for commercial landlords and developers who are being squeezed by a high cost of borrowing and already scrambling to change the terms of their debt.

A recent Moody’s podcast offers a glimmer of hope that there are enough factors to offset the challenges of CRE delinquencies. But with the rate cuts that the market hoped for last year now expected to be much less significant, will put further stress on a CRE market that’s addicted to rock-bottom borrowing costs. If the Fed cuts rates too low, inflation will spiral out of control, but keep them too high, and other things (like CRE) will continue to bend and break.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 10:25

Bond Market’s Eerie Calm Belies Bigger Move On Way

Bond Market’s Eerie Calm Belies Bigger Move On Way

Authored by Simon White, Bloomberg macro strategist,

Volatility in US interest rate and bond markets is poised to move much higher as it re-attaches to underlying fundamentals. That means higher rates and greater stock volatility, leaving especially high-duration sectors such as tech exposed to underperformance and potential downside.

There is something of a preternatural calm to bond markets at the moment. Despite upside growth and inflation risks bubbling up, bond volatility has been in a downward trend for the past six months. It remains much lower than the highs it reached in 2022, and the spasm that was the SVB crisis in 2023.

But there are mounting signs that this won’t last, and we should soon see larger moves in yields again with an upward bias. That also means the currently-depressed VIX is poised to move higher. After a recess, volatility is coming back.

Low or falling volatility often precedes big moves. If you need an example, consider gold and silver. Their volatility fell to multi-year lows in February, ahead of both metals surging higher in recent days.

The MOVE index is the bond equivalent of the VIX. It uses a range of options on interest-rate swaps of different maturities to gauge the average level of rate volatility. As with the VIX, it was very low in the early years of the pandemic as the Federal Reserve pulled out all the stops to avert an economic calamity.

But unlike the VIX, the MOVE rose sharply as the Fed began to raise rates at a faster clip than it had done for decades, before cresting amid the turbulence of SVB’s collapse. Since then it has steadily fallen – yet this is increasingly at odds with the underlying risks.

Most focus has been on slowing inflation, but inflation volatility is telling a different story. It’s the variability in inflation as much as its level that’s a problem for bond volatility. Inflation’s volatility, after dipping, is rising strongly again. The MOVE is soon likely to correct higher to reflect rising inflation uncertainty.

The disconnect is not confined to inflation volatility. The real yield curve, which typically flattens as inflation falls, has stopped flattening, and signally failed to invert as it did in the early 1980s when Volcker unambiguously snuffed out inflation by jacking real rates considerably higher.

Yet despite today’s latent inflation risks, implied short-term rate volatility has declined rapidly back to its long-term average. The fourth generic SOFR contract (currently December 2024 expiry) is implying a daily move of only 5-6 bps in short-term rates, from more than 12 bps just last year.

That’s still much higher than the post-GFC QE era, but a more fitting comparison is the 1990s and 2000s when five bps a day was the normal daily move. Even so, with higher upside inflation risks today than back then, a five-bps implied move in short-term rates is a floor not a ceiling.

Bonds face inflation as well as upside growth risks, but markets appear to be more worried about the second than the first. Implied bond volatility might be falling, but realized volatility in nominal 10-year yields has been rising. Until early last year, volatility in real yields was also rising, but since then it has been falling.

This suggests a market expectant of upside growth risks (as leading data has been projecting, and the recent better-than-expected manufacturing ISM was a timely reminder of), but exceedingly relaxed about risks from inflation.

Yet with inflation risks rising, not falling, real-yield vol will soon rise, reinforcing nominal-yield volatility (indeed TIPS volatility and skew may be early indicators of impending stress).

That won’t be the end of it though. While the MOVE has fallen, the VIX is considerably lower on a relative basis. Going back over the last 35 years, the VIX versus MOVE ratio has only been lower 15% of the time. That will change when bond vol rises.

But what is the actual mechanism by which higher rate volatility – not necessarily higher rates – boosts stock-market volatility? In this cycle, certainly, that role is likely to be filled by equity-index correlation.

Index correlation has been driven lower by index concentration (the Magnificent Seven effect) and by falling volatility in rates markets. But correlation is now so low it can only really go in one direction, and do so abruptly. It’s the muted correlation between stocks that’s been keeping the VIX low despite the volatility of many single stocks being quite elevated.

Stock-market correlation and bond volatility typically move together, as stocks’ valuations change more as the variance in rates rises. As the chart below shows, the central trends of the MOVE index and index correlation are closely aligned, ex the monthly up-and-down noise in the latter.

Thus a rise in bond volatility would lead to a rising index correlation, which would very quickly translate into a higher VIX.

Higher equity vol would be destabilizing for the stock market. While it may not lead immediately to a broad selloff, in an environment of rising inflation risks high-duration sectors such as tech are prone to underperformance.

Fortunately, though, stock hedges are still cheap. For example, a 25 delta (~4% out-of-the-money) put option on the XLK tech sector ETF with a one-month expiry costs about 3.2% on an annualized basis. That’s about as cheap as it gets.

“Let no man claim he has got through the perils of winter till at least the 7th of May”, counseled the writer Anthony Trollope. It may be April, but the perils are not over for the bond – or equity – markets, and may in fact just be getting started.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 09:45

Supreme Court Considers Hawaiian Climate Change Lawsuit That Could Destroy Energy Industry

Supreme Court Considers Hawaiian Climate Change Lawsuit That Could Destroy Energy Industry

We’re all familiar with progressive gun control groups and their lawsuits against the firearms industry – The basic premise being that gun manufacturers should be held liable when their products are used in the commission of a crime.  Such litigation is designed to destroy entire industries financially rather than politically.  In other words, if Democrats can’t change the law and they can’t change the minds of the public about 2nd Amendment rights, then they will try to force change by crippling the companies that make the guns they don’t like.

The legal argument is absurd because it requires courts to assume business liability based on the misuse of their products.  If someone uses a Toyota truck as a getaway vehicle during a robbery, does Toyota share in the liability of that robbery?  What if the plaintiffs couldn’t even prove they were robbed, or that a Toyota truck was involved?  What if the entire robbery is based on a theory backed by zero concrete evidence?  Should Toyota be made to pay billions or shut down operations to appease victims that cannot show they were victimized? 

The answer is no, of course not, but that’s not how the Supreme Court of Hawaii sees the issue when it comes to climate change.

In 2020, the city of Honolulu sued several major fossil fuel companies, including Exxon and Chevron, claiming the companies’ products cause greenhouse gas emissions and global warming without warning consumers about the risks.  The city employed a series of state laws including public nuisance and trespass measures and said the companies should pay billions to the state to abate the effects of climate change like weather events, sea level rise, heat waves, flooding and global warming. 

The success of the Hawaiian suit would set a precedent for Democrat run states across the nation, allowing them to essentially overwhelm energy companies with lawsuits until they are forced to accept Green New Deal-like parameters and apply them in every state in the US.  Meaning, it won’t matter if conservative states oppose the measures, they would be applied anyway. 

The cost to the American public would be devastating, increasing energy expenses to levels that would make domestic manufacturing impossible and decreasing quality of life for the average citizen for decades to come.

Energy companies appealed to the Hawaii Supreme Court, arguing federal law prevents individual states from effectively shaping energy policies for all states.  But that court disagreed and ruled that the case should advance to trial.  At least 20 conservative states have opposed the furtherance of the Honolulu case and have asked the US Supreme Court to step in.  The court is considering the case now, but if they refuse to intervene the implications for energy policy and inflation across America will be sweeping.  

It should be noted that there is zero substantiated proof of a causational relationship between the oil industry, carbon emissions and global warming.  All scientific evidence is based on correlation and assumption.  There is also no proof whatsoever that “man-made climate change” has any effect on global weather patterns and “bad weather.”  

CO2 levels are actually far lower today than they have been for the majority of the Earth’s history.  Temperatures also deviate from CO2 levels constantly.

   

Beyond the lack of relationship between CO2 and temps in the past, global temps for hundreds of millions of years rose and fell without any human influence.  The Earth has been far warmer than today, all without any input from oil based energy and human activity.

The climate change agenda is a farce based on faulty assumptions and faulty science.  How can any serious court hold a company liable for the commission of a crime that doesn’t exist? 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 09:25

15 Year Study: Vast Majority Of Children Grow Out Of Gender Confusion

15 Year Study: Vast Majority Of Children Grow Out Of Gender Confusion

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

A landmark study conducted over the past 15 years has concluded that most children who experience confusion regarding their gender identity grow out of it and go on to feel content with their lives as men and women.

The study, carried out in the Netherlands by researchers from the University of Groningen, involved more than 2,700 children, tracking them from age 11 to their mid-twenties.

The Daily Mail reports that every three years, the individuals were asked how they felt about their gender.

At the beginning of the study, around 11 percent, or one in ten of the children, expressed ‘gender non-contentedness’.

However, by the age of 25, just 4 percent, or one in 25, said they ‘often’ or ‘sometimes’ felt discontent with their gender.

The study comes as the controversy over allowing children to be given puberty blocking hormones, or even gender reassignment surgery, rages on.

The researchers noted, “The results of the current study might help adolescents to realise that it is normal to have some doubts about one’s identity and one’s gender identity during this age period and that this is also relatively common.”

Published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior, the study found that around 19 percent became more content with their gender over 15 years, while just 2 percent became less comfortable. Overall, 78 percent felt the same.

The authors further noted that “Gender non-contentedness, while being relatively common during early adolescence, in general decreases with age and appears to be associated with a poorer self-concept and mental health throughout development.”

Patrick Brown, a fellow at the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center noted “This study provides even more reason to be skeptical towards aggressive steps to facilitate gender transition in childhood and adolescence.”

Brown added, “The fact that rates of satisfaction are lower even just a few years later suggests that for the vast majority of people, prudence and caution, rather than a rush towards permanent surgeries or hormone therapies, will be the best approach for teenagers struggling to make sense of the world and their place in it.”

A recent report by health data analytics firm Definitive Healthcare revealed that the rate of gender dysphoria increased in every state in America except South Dakota from 2018 to 2022 across all ages. 

In some states it has increased by over 200 percent in just four years.

Since 2014, there has been an explosion in young adults identifying as transgender:

This has gone hand in hand with a massive increase in transgender surgeries and so called ‘gender affirming care’.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/04/2024 – 09:05