79.6 F
Chicago
Friday, September 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 3106

The Media Is Hyping Up “Carbon Passports” To Restrict Travel

0
The Media Is Hyping Up “Carbon Passports” To Restrict Travel

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

A talking point that is now everywhere in the media is the notion that in the near future travel is highly likely to be restricted through the introduction of so called ‘carbon passports’.

Last week, CNN ran a piece created by something called ‘The Conversation,’ which had the headline “It’s time to limit how often we can travel abroad – ‘carbon passports’ may be the answer”

Within this “analysis,” readers were told that record-breaking heatwaves, wildfires and extreme weather events are being driven in part by people going on holiday.

“Tourism is part of the problem,” the piece asserts, adding “The tourism sector generates around one-tenth of the greenhouse gas emissions that are driving the climate crisis.”

It then goes on to suggest that the introduction of carbon passports which would see every “traveler being assigned a yearly carbon allowance that they cannot exceed,” could “ration” travel.

“This concept may seem extreme,” the writer states before telling you that it isn’t and it’s a probably a good idea because of how on the verge of collapse the environment is.

“Boiling temperatures will probably diminish the allure of traditional beach destinations,” anyway, claims the author.

This isn’t just one alarmist story languishing somewhere in the dark depths of CNN’s website, it’s everywhere:

The propaganda information, including another piece published this week by Business Insider, all cites a report written by a consultancy agency called The Future Laboratory which was released by a travel company called Intrepid.

That report states that “These allowances will manifest as passports that force people to ration their carbon in line with the global carbon budget, which is 750 billion tonnes until 2050.”

“By 2040, we can expect to see limitations imposed on the amount of travel that is permitted each year,” it continues, adding that by then “it will be unusual to see members of Generation Alpha without a carbon-footprint tracker on their smartphones. Every Uber ride, plane journey, and trip to the supermarket will be logged in their devices, noting their carbon footprint in real time.”

Sounds like a lot of fun.

Not only will you own nothing and like it, if this progresses as these ‘experts’ suggest, you won’t be able to go anywhere either.

Of course, people like Bill GatesJohn Kerry and their ilk will still be allowed to constantly fly around in their private jets, because they are “the solution.”

Your one budget Easyjet flight to Malaga every couple of years is the big problem.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 15:00

RH Plunges After Big Miss On Soaring Mortgage Rates, Warns Housing Market Remains “Frozen”

0
RH Plunges After Big Miss On Soaring Mortgage Rates, Warns Housing Market Remains “Frozen”

RH, formerly known as Restoration Hardware, tumbled a whopping 13% after the upscale home furnishings retailer blamed high mortgage rates in the US for a surprise net loss in its third quarter and cut its 2024 adjusted operating margin forecast, warning that promotions will pressure its bottom line amid a “frozen” housing market.

RH “experienced increased headwinds in early October when mortgage rates peaked above 8%” and the Israel-Hamas war started, it said in a letter to shareholders while warning  that it continues “to expect the existing housing market to remain frozen until interest rates and/or home prices fall meaningfully.”

“Additionally, the home furnishings market has become increasingly promotional, and we believe that will create a mix shift toward clearance products, pressuring gross margins.”

The California-based company, which counted Berkshire as one of its largest shareholders until Q1 when the conglomerate dumped its entire position, said on Thursday its business was hurt by elevated mortgage rates that peaked at 8% in October. That has rendered the housing market “frozen” until rates fall and is and reducing opportunities for affluent consumers to furnish new homes (since they are stuck in their existing homes until rates drop enough to allow new mortgage aorigination).

RH also described the furniture market as “increasingly promotional,” a trend that could put pressure on its high-priced offerings and margins.

RH lost $2 million, or 12 cents a share, in Q3, swinging from earnings of $99 million, or $3.78 a share, a year ago. Adjusted for one-time items, the company lost 42 cents a share, a huge miss to consensus forecasts of 94 cents a share. Revenue fell to $751 million, from $869 million a year ago, also missing estimates of $757 million.

Operating margins were below expectations due to higher-than-expected expenses, including international store openings, costs related to the pending acquisition of the New York Guesthouse property and “unsuccessful efforts to secure the iconic One Ocean Drive Miami Beach location,” the company said. RH in September announced plans to “reimagine and restore” the public property.

In keeping with the often bizarre tone of its letter to shareholders, RH said it continues with its plans to “expand the RH ecosystem” where customers will be inspired “to dream, design, dine, travel and live in a world thoughtfully curated by RH, creating an emotional connection unlike any other brand in the world.”

“For the past 23 years we’ve heard others tell us what can’t be done, and for the past 23 years we’ve failed… to listen,” said the letter from eclectic CEO Gary Friedman. “Soon the world will be within our reach.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 14:40

Russia’s Flagship Crude Oil Falls Below The $60 Price-Cap, But…

0
Russia’s Flagship Crude Oil Falls Below The $60 Price-Cap, But…

Authored by Tsvetana Paraskova via OilPrice.com,

The price of Russia’s flagship crude, Urals, has dropped below the $60 per barrel price cap for the first time in months amid plunging international benchmarks.

The price of Urals crude loaded from Russia’s Baltic Sea port of Primorsk fell to $56.15 a barrel, while the price of Urals at the Novorossiysk port in the Black Sea slumped to $56.55, Bloomberg reported on Thursday citing data from Argus Media.

The data is used to inform G-7 policy on the price cap. 

Brent Crude prices fell below $75 per barrel on Wednesday, settling at the lowest level since June, amid rising U.S. oil production and inventories, concerns about the Chinese economy, and underwhelming OPEC+ cuts.

Urals crude has been trading above the price cap since July, and reports have emerged that the West is considering toughening up the sanction enforcement on evaders of the price cap on Russian oil, almost none of which has recently traded below the ceiling of $60 per barrel. 

The recent rout in the oil market has driven Urals below the price cap, for now.

The average price of Urals dropped in November from October but was still way above the Western price cap of $60 per barrel, data from Russia’s Finance Ministry showed last week.

The average price of the Urals grade was $72.84 per barrel last month, down from $81.52 a barrel in October, but higher than the $66.47 average price in November 2022, according to the data.

Despite the Urals prices holding above the price cap, Russia’s largest oil and gas exporters saw their total revenues plunge by 41% between January and September compared to the same period last year, due to lower commodity prices and lower exports, Russia’s central bank said in a financial stability review on Thursday. 

Over the first nine months of the year, the share of Chinese yuan in payments for Russia’s oil and gas exports jumped from 13% in January to 35% in September. The share of the exports in Russian rubles remains significant – at 39% in September 2023, the Bank of Russia said.

But…

As the price of Russia’s flagship crude fell below the $60 per barrel price cap and international benchmarks slumped, India expects to increase its purchases of Russian oil, an anonymous senior government official in India told Reuters on Friday.

The Indian official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said there would not be any impact on India’s intake of Russian oil due to Western sanctions on ships as enough vessels were available in the market.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 14:20

Hunter Biden Vs. Elon Musk: First Crackhead Talks Trash During ‘Moby’ Damage Control Podcast

0
Hunter Biden Vs. Elon Musk: First Crackhead Talks Trash During ‘Moby’ Damage Control Podcast

If you needed any more evidence we’re in the most entertaining timeline imaginable (or this is all a simulation), Hunter Biden has now picked a fight with Elon Musk.

Following Hunter’s multiple felony tax charges that hit Thursday night, the international energy expert appeared on the formerly famous Moby’s podcast to do damage control – which is hilarious in and of itself. Yes, the same Moby who claimed in 2018 that the CIA asked him to spread the Trump-Russia hoax. On the same day WaPo buried the story six ways from Sunday.

While discussing Elon Musk, Hunter began projection-ranting, suggesting that the political sphere is ‘some kind of a game’ to Musk, who is ‘culpable’ for spreading misinformation about him.

“Elon Musk doesn’t care about the goddamn First Amendment.. all of this idea that he is a champion for the First Amendment and blah blah,” he said.

To which Musk replied on X: “Exactly what “misinformation” is he talking about? The dude made so many videos of himself doing crime that he should get an award for cinematography!”

For example…

The replies are, of course, hilarious (given the timeline and all):

 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 14:00

Global Rate Correlation Shows View Central Banks Hunt In Packs

0
Global Rate Correlation Shows View Central Banks Hunt In Packs

Authored by Ven Ram, Bloomberg cross-asset strategist,

Depending on how you are positioned on rates, there is a virtuous circle – or a vicious cycle – on display in the major global rates markets, with markets feeding off one another.

Correlations between German front-end bonds and comparable Treasuries, usually pretty remarkable, are now close closing in on 0.9.

Which is to say that much of the shift that we have seen in German front-end bonds reflects what is happening across the Atlantic.

That isn’t to say that recent rally in two-year German securities doesn’t have legs.

Between August and the end of November, the markets tried to push the yield on the maturity below 3% several times – and failed at each of those attempts.

But with the disinflationary narrative in the euro zone gaining credibility, the current rally is fully sanctified.

The degree of enthusiasm sweeping through the markets may also be seen in front-end gilts’ correlation with Treasuries, which has shot up from deeply negative levels – when UK and Treasury yields were marching in opposite directions – to around 0.7 now.

Given that the UK has arguably the most deeply embedded and worst inflation outlook among the major markets, one might think that moves in front-end gilts that are in lockstep with Treasuries are hardly justified.

However, there is an underlying message from the markets that speaks to their long-held conviction that central banks hunt in packs, never alone – meaning, should the Fed pivot, so will the European Central Bank and others possibly following in tow.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 13:40

The EU-China Trade Relationship Is In The Balance

0
The EU-China Trade Relationship Is In The Balance

By Teeuwe Mevissen of Rabobank

Yesterday the first in-person meeting between European and Chinese leaders in four years took place. Covid made an earlier summit like this impossible so it was about time that leaders of both blocks would meet to discuss a plethora of topics that currently define EU-Sino relations. Despite the necessity of talks and policy coordination on cross border challenges, expectations regarding the outcome of the summit were modest at best. According to a summit background document published by the European Commission, five major topics were on the agenda:

  • EU-China relations including economic and trade,

  • Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine,

  • the situation in the Middle East,

  • climate change,

  • global health and pandemic preparedness.

While the EU will raise concerns about the current imbalance in EU-China trade relations, China reiterated that they want to be a key trading partner with the EU. This unfortunately does not solve EU’s increasing trade deficit with China and patience seems to be running out. In other words, EU-China’s trade relationship might be in the balance.

It is not expected that a ground-breaking resolution will be agreed upon. But aside from the economic and financial implications of EU-China trade relations, Covid – amongst others – also made clear that being over-reliant on certain key inputs from one or just a few countries leaves one vulnerable in times of crisis. Indeed, only yesterday we published a special report addressing EU’s vulnerabilities in an ever changing and increasingly fragmented world order. The low expectations that were voiced before the summit turned out to be a justified. While it is common that after summits like this a joint press statement is provided, none was given this time. Still it remains important that the EU and China continue to engage via top levels of government if only to cooperate on issues were both share common interests like climate change.  

This morning saw a slew of data coming from Japan. This followed a major shift in market expectations regarding future monetary policy of the Bank of Japan (BoJ). BoJ President Kazuo Ueda addressed members of parliament yesterday with the message that his job will become more challenging next year indicating possible changes in its monetary policy stance i.e. a departure from Japan’s negative policy rate. Soon after his deputy Ryozo rushed in to calm down markets with the message that no significant adverse impact is to be expected from a rate hike. Needless to say that this actually seems to confirm market expectations that the era of negative rates in Japan might soon be over. But looking at the most recent data that came out this morning, the BoJ’s mission to normalize monetary policy could be in jeopardy already. This morning it became clear that in the third quarter Japan’s economy shrunk with an annualized 2.9%, more than expected in the first estimate. Private consumption declined 0.2% compared to the previous quarter so not exactly the window of opportunity that the BoJ was looking for, perhaps.

All of this resulted in considerable strengthening of the yen against the dollar. At one point yesterday the yen gained 4% against the dollar and bearish bets on the yen were quickly abandoned. Thin liquidity added to the large swings that were observed yesterday. However a former executive director of the BoJ – Hideo Hayakawa – warned that markets have overreacted on yesterday’s comments from Kazuo Ueda. According to Hideo Hayakawa “This is probably a temporary market phenomenon,”. He added that “Ueda is looking for evidence. There is no need to rush now after intentionally choosing to be behind in coming this far.” While we already expected an appreciation of the yen vis a vis the dollar, yesterday’s pace already breached our 6 month forecast of 148 and at the moment of writing USDJPY is still at a level of just below 144, as our currency watcher Jane Foley notes. Therefore we also think that USDJPY is oversold at this moment but we do continue to expect a level of 142 in 12 months from now.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 12:20

Penn Trustees Call “Emergency” Meeting After Magill Testimony Meltdown

0
Penn Trustees Call “Emergency” Meeting After Magill Testimony Meltdown

After a smirking Penn president Liz Magill humiliated herself in front of Congress earlier this week, unable to clearly answer whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” violated Penn’s code of conduct or constituted bullying or harassment, the University of Pennsylvania’s board of trustees have started the process of panicking.

Perhaps it has something to do with $100 million worth of donations being pulled from the university in one fell swoop, the tip of a spear of outrage made up of numerous other prominent donors, alumni, university staff and generally anyone with half a brain that watched Magill’s testimony earlier in the week. 

“Absent a change in leadership and values at Penn in the very near future, I plan to rescind Penn’s Stone Ridge shares to help prevent any further reputational and other damage to Stone Ridge as a result of our relationship with Penn and Liz Magill,” wrote Penn Alum Ross Stevens. 

And so, as happens when large sums of money are involved, the board of trustees swiftly held an “emergency meeting” on Thursday and the Wharton Board of Advisors called for a change in leadership at the university, according to CNN

“Magill faced a rebellion from Wharton’s Board of Advisors,” CNN reported on Thursday night.

The Wharton Board of Advisors wrote in a letter to Magill: “As a result of the University leadership’s stated beliefs and collective failure to act, our Board respectfully suggests to you and the Board of Trustees that the University requires new leadership with immediate effect.”

“In light of your testimony yesterday before Congress, we demand the University clarify its position regarding any call for harm to any group of people immediately, change any policies that allow such conduct with immediate effect, and discipline any offenders expeditiously,” it continues. 

“Our board has been, and remains, deeply concerned about the dangerous and toxic culture on our campus that has been led by a select group of students and faculty and has been permitted by University leadership,” it adds. 

Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, told CNN: “I understand why the governor of Pennsylvania and so many of the trustees don’t have confidence in her. I don’t have confidence anymore that Penn is capable, under this leadership, of getting it right.”

“I am a Penn alum and this is indeed shameful,” Elon Musk said of the testimony on Wednesday on X. 

Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand agreed, stating on Thursday: “Their statements were abhorrent. Trying to contextualize what constitutes harassment? Jewish students are terrified on these campuses.”

For now, though, it still appears that Magill has retained her job. “There is no board plan for imminent leadership change,” a board member told CNN. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 12:00

Joe Biden: Economic Ignoramus

0
Joe Biden: Economic Ignoramus

Authored by Michael Maharrey via SchiffGold.com,

Are “greedy” corporations driving inflation? Could taxing billionaires solve the federal government’s fiscal problems?

According to President Joe Biden, the answer to both questions is yes.

And the correct answer is no.

So, Biden is either economically ignorant or a liar. Or maybe both.

Biden put his economic ignorance on full display with a couple of comments last week.

Greedy Corporations Are Causing Inflation!

Biden made the first comment in a speech during the launch of a new White House supply chain initiative. It had to do with price inflation.

Any corporation that has not brought their prices back down, even as inflation has come down, even as the supply chains have been rebuilt, it’s time to stop the price gouging. Give the American consumer a break.”

The general public eats this stuff. Blaming greedy corporations for rising prices plays to the president’s base.

The truth is that corporations don’t create price inflation. One simply has to reason through the claim to uncover the absurdity of the idea. If corporations can willy-nilly raise prices and enjoy “excessive” profits, why don’t they do it all the time? Did corporations suddenly get greedy in 2021? And why did the Federal Reserve spend a decade fretting about inflation being “too low” as it struggled to hit its 2% target? Was there not enough corporate greed before the coronavirus?

But government people like Biden can get away with this narrative because they have redefined inflation.

Historically, economists defined inflation as an increase in the amount of money and credit — or put another way, an expansion in the money supply. Over the years, the government, along with its apologists in the corporate media and academia, altered the definition to suit government purposes. Today, inflation just means “rising prices.”

But rising prices in and of themselves aren’t inflation. Prices can go up for all kinds of reasons. For instance, we might have higher demand or supply shortages.

Rising prices aren’t inflation, but they are a symptom of monetary inflation. When governments and central banks increase the money supply,  ALL prices go up more than they otherwise would have.

Economist Ludwig von Mises explains the problem with this change in definitions.

“People today use the term `inflation’ to refer to the phenomenon that is an inevitable consequence of inflation, that is the tendency of all prices and wage rates to rise. The result of this deplorable confusion is that there is no term left to signify the cause of this rise in prices and wages. There is no longer any word available to signify the phenomenon that has been, up to now, called inflation. . . . As you cannot talk about something that has no name, you cannot fight it. Those who pretend to fight inflation are in fact only fighting what is the inevitable consequence of inflation, rising prices. Their ventures are doomed to failure because they do not attack the root of the evil. They try to keep prices low while firmly committed to a policy of increasing the quantity of money that must necessarily make them soar. As long as this terminological confusion is not entirely wiped out, there cannot be any question of stopping inflation.”

If we use the traditional definition of inflation as an “expansion of the supply of money,” the culprit becomes clear. Who expands the supply of money? It’s the Fed and the federal government. So, if you accurately define inflation, you know exactly who’s to blame. But if the government can fool people into believing that the effect of inflation is inflation, they can blame it on everybody but themselves.

Biden played it perfectly. It’s good politics, but it’s horrible economics.

The comment is even dumber than that. Biden implies that inflation “going down” means companies should lower their prices.

That’s not how this works. That’s not how any of this works.

When we say inflation is “cooling,” we just mean that based on the CPI, prices aren’t rising as fast as they were earlier this year. But prices are still rising. Now granted, the CPI in October was flat. Prices didn’t rise during that month. But they didn’t fall either. So, why should corporations cut prices? They are still paying much more to produce goods and services than they were last year.

How much more?

Since January 2022, prices have gone up 9.7% based on the CPI. And you should know that the CPI is designed to understate rising prices. They changed the formula in the 1990s. If we were using the CPI formula they used back then, CPI would be double what it is today.

To sum it up, prices have gone up almost 10% in less than two years (based on questionable government numbers). They are still going up today, just not quite as fast. And Biden is finger-pointing at corporations. Meanwhile, his administration is borrowing and spending like a drunken sailor, which, by the way, is inflationary.

And that brings us to Biden’s second ignorant statement.

Taxing Billionaires Will Fix Everything!

You won’t be surprised to learn Joe Biden wants to tax billionaires more.

A billionaire minimum tax of just 25% would raise $440 billion over the next 10 years. Imagine what we could do if we just made billionaires pay their taxes like everyone else.”

This is typical left-wing class warfare stuff. I don’t even want to get into the value of billionaires to society. Let’s just take it at face value, pretend billionaires are evil parasites, and look at the math.

That $440 billion sounds like a lot of money. And it is to normal people. But in government accounting, it’s basically pennies.

The US government spends around $500 billion every single month. That means the amount of money Uncle Sam could collect with this proposed tax over 10 years wouldn’t fund the government for one single month.

Let’s look at it another way. The US government paid $879 billion in interest expense during fiscal 2023. That means this $440 billion windfall would only pay half of the interest expense for one year.

Out of curiosity, I did a little digging. Turns out there are 740 American billionaires with a collective net worth of $5 trillion. Keep in mind, it’s not like these people have $5 trillion in cash sitting in a vault somewhere. A lot of that wealth is in stocks and real estate. A bad week in the stock market could drastically lower that number very quickly.

But let’s pretend they have that much money in cash. If the government took all of it – every single penny – it wouldn’t fund the government for a single year.

Last year, the Biden administration spent $6.46 trillion. You don’t have to have a Ph.D. in math to realize that’s bigger than $5 trillion.

Democrats especially like to use billionaires as a scapegoat. They pretend that if we just taxed these people more, the government could do whatever it wants, solve world hunger, and give you a unicorn.

It’s just not true.

The truth is the government spends too much. It borrows too much. The Fed creates inflation to do it. You pay the inflation tax every time you go to the grocery or the gas station. The government is stealing your wealth every single day.

Here’s the truth – despite what Joe Biden tells you, none of your problems are because of a billionaire.

Your biggest problem is politicians and government people. And they’re playing you.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 11:40

Oil Rebounds After DOE Seeks To Buy 3 Million Barrels For SPR In March

0
Oil Rebounds After DOE Seeks To Buy 3 Million Barrels For SPR In March

With oil plunging an (almost) unprecedented 7 weeks in a row, the longest such stretch since 2018…

… and many momentum chasing experts – the same ones who two months ago were calling for triple digit oil – already predicting that Saudi Arabia will soon be forced to do what it did in March 2020 when it flooded the market with oil to crush higher cost competitors, this morning we got a reminder of just why oil isn’t trading far, far higher.

For those confused, the reason why oil is not in the triple digits is the drain of more than 300 million of barrels of oil from the SPR under the Biden administration …

… which slammed oil prices during late 2022 and early 2023 as the initial shock from the Ukraine war faded and as the US slashed its emergency reserve to offset declining global stockpiles as well as to flood the market.

The problem is that having eliminated roughly half of the US strategic petroleum reserve at a time when China has tactically built up its own to over 1 billion barrels (why oh why, would China be doing this, the narrator asked rhetorically), has left the US not only exposed to any true emergency (and there will be plenty) but also threatens to collapse the salt caverns which make up the SPR and which have not been this empty since the 1980s.

It’s also why there has been pressure on Biden to at least start refilling the SPR. And today, Biden’s DOE announced that it was seeking 3 million barrels for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for delivery in March, according to a solicitation Friday.

The news pushed oil to session highs, above $71, after trading as low as $68.8 yesterday, the lowest price since July.

And while we applaud the DOE initiative to at least pretend to refill the SPR, we point out that there is a reason why the refilling process is so slow: if 3 million barrels bought over 1 month is enough to push the price of oil almost $2 higher, the DOE – whose primary mandate is to not push oil, and thus gasoline, prices higher in the election 2024 year – may just get cold feet after this latest solicitation and shelve any future refills. And even if the current pace of refilling continues, assuming 3 million barrels per month, it will take 96 months, or just about 8 years, for the SPR to go back to where it was at the start of the Biden administration.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 11:20

The Financial Disaster No One Is Talking About

0
The Financial Disaster No One Is Talking About

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us,

Several years ago I predicted that the U.S. would ultimately be confronted with the debilitating economic conundrum of stagflation, something which the nation had not seen since the 1970s. I suggested that stagflation would become a household word again and that the majority of American concerns would revolve around rising prices coupled with stagnant wages and falling production.

In 2018 in my article Stagflationary Crisis: U.S.A.’s Ongoing Collapse, Understanding the Cause, I noted:

Years ago there was a rather idiotic battle between financial analysts over what the end result of the Fed’s massive stimulus measures would be. One side argued that deflation would be the outcome and that no amount of Fed printing would overtake the vast black hole of debt conjured by the derivatives implosion. The other side argued that the Fed would continue to print perpetually, resorting to QE4 or possibly “QE infinity” and negative interest rates as a means to stave off a market crash for decades (like Japan) while at the same time initiating a Weimar-style inflationary bonanza.

Both sides were wrong because they refused to acknowledge the third option – stagflation.

Sleepwalking into stagflation

The process of stagflation is difficult to track because there are multiple paths that it can take, many of them largely dependent on the whims of the central bank and its policy decisions. All we can really do is look back at the limited number of historic examples simply and guess what will happen next. In the 1970s stagflation nearly crushed the country, with inflation rising by 7% to over 14% per year for a decade.

When I hear Zennials complain about being born into the “worst economy ever,” I have to laugh because they really have no clue. The 1970s was far worse in terms of erosion of buying power as well as overall poverty. If you look at film footage and photos of urban areas from Los Angeles to New York to Philadelphia during that time, many parts of these cities looked like bombed-out war zones.

The country was truly on the edge of disaster.

In the early 1980s, under Paul Volcker’s leadership the Federal Reserve jacked interest rates up to over 20%. This stopped the inflation crisis but triggered a deflationary plunge that would sit like a giant boulder on the chest of the American consumer and small business owners for years to come. My own grandfather lost millions in his trucking and freight company during the rate spike; many people lost their businesses and homes.

In other words, as bad as the situation is now, we haven’t seen anything yet. Of course, we are quickly moving towards similar conditions and there is one thing we have today that the 1970s didn’t: A massive (and growing) national debt.

Currently, the U.S. national debt is $33.8 trillion and has a 120% debt-to-GDP ratio. In a single month, October 2023, the federal government added over $600 billion to the debt. At the current pace the total debt will breach $41 trillion in one year.

The speed of this accumulation is frightening. To put this in perspective, the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve added around $9 trillion to the debt in eight years with the corporate bailout spree of the Great Financial Crisis. Compared to the Biden administration, Obama’s spending looks absolutely miserly.

How is this possible?

The swirling debt spiral

As I have noted in the past, the U.S. economy rests on a foundation of intrinsically worthless currency – and so much debt that the slightest rise in interest rates causes huge ripple effects.

The 20% interest rate level of the early 1980s? Yes, it was worrisome, and led to not one but two grueling recessions. After 200 years of existence, the U.S. ended the decade of the 80s with just under $3 trillion in debt.

Today? Well, for comparison purposes, the Biden administration’s 2021 budget added $2.77 trillion to the national debt. In ONE YEAR! For comparison purposes, from 1776-1989, the federal government accumulated about $2.77 trillion in debt.

It’s impossible to overstate this point: The Biden regime saddled the nation with over 200 years’ worth of debt in just one year.

With a debt over $33 trillion, barely-above-historical-average 5.25% interest rates are catastrophic. Because of “compounding interest,” what Einstein called “the most powerful force in the Universe.” He called it one of the greatest “miracles” known to mankind – if you’re a creditor. If you’re a debtor, though? That miracle becomes a disaster…

Today, the U.S. government regularly borrows money just to make interest payments. The Treasury department also writes new IOUs to fund old IOUs that come due. Finally, the government borrows still more to fund all spending which exceeds tax collection (this is “deficit spending,” which increases the national debt – sometimes the two are conflated).

At higher interest-rate levels, borrowing enters a destructive spiral. There’s interest payments on debt, which was itself borrowed to make interest payments on debt. To put it in simple terms, it’s a bit like a broke person taking on a stack of new credit cards to make the interest payments on a stack of old credit cards. It’s financial suicide.

Eventually the avalanche of debt will stall inflation but it will also wreak havoc across the economy and trigger a deflationary crisis.

We’re seeing the beginning already… The crash across manufacturing and industrial sectors. Frozen wages. Layoffs and bankruptcies piling up in the freight sector.

These are all clear indicators of impending recession. Meanwhile, U.S. home sales have plunged to a 13 year low as prices continue to rise.

These are all red flags of an impending deflation event that is certain to cause massive unemployment, likely within the next year. It would seem the magic of the Covid-era money-printing spree is finally fading away – and we’re seeing the real economy underneath.

The expectation among investors is that the Fed is poised to cut rates or return swiftly to QE. This is not going to happen, at least not anytime soon. The Fed, I believe, wants a crash. After addicting markets to easy money for over a decade, the central bankers know exactly what will happen as they continue to cut off the drug supply.

I suspect we are about to see a major change in the behavior of the economy going into 2024. The stagflation phase is nearly over. The discussion around dinner tables across America will turn to the exploding national debt, and debt in general. The big debate will once again turn to this: Will the Fed keep rates steady, risking deflationary implosion and debt default, or, will they cut rates, return to stimulus to pay the debt, and risk double digit inflation? These are the two choices in front of the U.S. government – and either way, we lose.

That’s why it’s more urgent than ever to own financial assets that aren’t based on debt, that aren’t IOUs but actual, tangible things you can see and touch. There are only a few left in this globally-financialized world – and of them, only physical precious metals are also private, safe haven stores of value. If you don’t own real physical gold and silver soon, your financial future will be tied to the U.S. government’s financial future.

The U.S. economy will fail. Those who don’t ensure their financial independence will sink with the ship. You can take steps now to protect yourself and your family, but the opportunity won’t last forever. Once it’s obvious that the ship is sinking, it’s too late – the lifeboats will already be full.

Don’t go down with the ship.

*  *  *

As the world moves away from dollars and toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), is your 401(k) or IRA really safe? A smart and conservative move is to diversify into a physical gold IRA. That way your savings will be in something solid and enduring. Get your FREE info kit on Gold IRAs from Birch Gold Group. No strings attached, just peace of mind. Click here to secure your future today.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 12/08/2023 – 11:00