79 F
Chicago
Saturday, August 22, 2026
Home Blog Page 3540

US Factory Orders Decline YoY For First Time Since Oct 2020

US Factory Orders Decline YoY For First Time Since Oct 2020

Headline US factory orders rose just 0.3% MoM in May (well below the +0.8% MoM exp), dragging the YoY change into the red (down 1.0% YoY) for the first time since Oct 2020…

Source: Bloomberg

Worse still, core factory orders fell for the 4th straight month in May, down 4.24% YoY (worst since Sept 2020)…

Source: Bloomberg

And if ISM data is anything to go by this is about to get much worse…

Source: Bloomberg

is this the ‘hard landing’ that The Fed is looking for? And for those who still believe the Services Sector can survive with a collapsing Manufacturing sector – see European PMIs this morning. They’re not independent, they are cyclically linked in lead-lag regime.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 10:08

Ex-Top Chinese Official Says Export Curb On Key Metals Is “Just The Beginning”

Ex-Top Chinese Official Says Export Curb On Key Metals Is “Just The Beginning”

On Monday, China announced export controls on two rare earth metals, gallium and germanium, starting on August 1. These critical rare earth metals are used in microchip production. On Wednesday, a former top Chinese official was quoted by state media as saying export controls on rare earth metals are “just the beginning.”

Former vice-minister of commerce Wei Jianguo spoke with China Daily and said Beijing has plenty of tools for countermeasures if the Biden administration continues to ramp up technology restrictions. He said the decision to restrict the export of gallium and germanium would “cause panic in certain countries, but also exert heavy pain in them.” 

Wei said: “This is just the beginning of China’s countermeasures, and China’s toolbox has many more types of measures available. If the high-tech restrictions on China become tougher in the future, China’s countermeasures will also escalate.”

This is alarming because China controls the world’s processing and refining of rare earth metals.

These metals have become essential for producing electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, and high-tech defense weapons. Any disruption of the rare earth metal trade to the West could impact supply chains. 

As for the military-industrial complex, which has already seen China place Lockheed Martin and a unit of Raytheon Technologies on an “unreliable entities list” over weapon sales to Taiwan, this is a major wake-up call that rare earth supply chains need to be rejiggered from Asia to elsewhere or even increase North American mining and refining capacity. 

“Any attempt to promote decoupling through hegemonism, including suppressing Chinese enterprises, will ultimately be a stone thrown at one’s own feet,” Wei added.

Five years into a trade war, the weaponization of trade flows appears to be in full swing. The announcement of the export controls came ahead of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s visit to Beijing on Thursday and was timed to send the Biden administration a message.  

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 09:50

Watch: Biden Wanders Around Lost, Slurs Through July 4 Speech

Watch: Biden Wanders Around Lost, Slurs Through July 4 Speech

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

Joe Biden wandered around lost on stage at July 4th celebrations Tuesday after barely slurring his way through a teleprompter speech.

When it was time for Uncle Joe to get back to bed this happened…

“I don’t, man! I want to say hi to him!” Biden blathered, adding “You’re trying to get me off stage! You’re afraid I’m gonna start singing!”

Awkward.

Earlier…

This line was inserted again…

When Biden was asked questions about cocaine being found in the White House, coincidentally coinciding with a Hunter Biden visit, he ignored them:

Something he can never ignore, however, is a gaggle of little girls:

It’s a far cry from this…

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 09:30

Teamsters Say UPS Negotiations Collapse As Nationwide Strike Still Possible

Teamsters Say UPS Negotiations Collapse As Nationwide Strike Still Possible

Early Wednesday morning, the Teamsters Union, with hundreds of thousands of members who are United Parcel Service (UPS) drivers, said UPS “walked away from the bargaining table” after it presented an “unacceptable offer.”

“This multibillion-dollar corporation has plenty to give American workers — they just don’t want to,” said Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien.

O’Brien continued, “UPS had a choice to make, and they have clearly chosen to go down the wrong road.”

UPS Teamsters have 340,000 members. The union has been locked in negotiations with UPS since mid-April. Meanwhile, a strike was imminent last week when the union said UPS had until Friday to deliver its “last, best, and final offer.” UPS did so, but after several rounds of negotiations through the July 4 holiday, talks broke down around 0400 ET when “UPS walked away from the bargaining table after presenting an unacceptable offer to the Teamsters,” the union said. 

There are still 26 days left in the month to reach a deal. On July 31, UPS Teamsters’ contract covering more than 340,000 full- and part-time workers is set to expire. The union has made it clear that union members will only work after that date if there’s a new contract. 

According to Bloomberg, the breakdown in talks came when both sides “couldn’t agree on larger issues surrounding pay and cost of living increases.” 

Bloomberg said UPS released a statement that is hopeful Teamsters would return to the negotiations table, saying it is proud of its offer and has not walked away. The shipping giant warned:

“Refusing to negotiate, especially when the finish line is in sight, creates significant unease among employees and customers and threatens to disrupt the US economy.” 

Teamsters General Secretary-Treasurer Fred Zuckerman wrote in a statement last week that thousands of union members have been practicing their picketing skills. 

Any strike by UPS Teamsters could cause devastating disruptions to the supply chain in the US and other parts of the world. 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 09:10

Senior Lazard Banker Terminated Due To “Inappropriate Behavior” At Weekend Party

Senior Lazard Banker Terminated Due To “Inappropriate Behavior” At Weekend Party

Once again, an employee has cost themselves their job due to behavior that took place outside of the workplace.

This time, a senior banker at Lazard Ltd. was fired after allegations of “inappropriate behavior during a weekend party” surfaced last week, Bloomberg reported on Monday. 

The employee was a managing director at the company’s financial advisory business. He was terminated after a company investigation into his actions found they were “incompatible with the firm’s values”, the report says.

Company chief executive officer Peter Orszag informed the company’s staff on Sunday via internal memo. The memo didn’t detail who the staff member was, or the alleged actions. 

Sources told Bloomberg that the actions occurred this past weekend, “at a personal party where other Lazard employees were also present”. The company promptly investigated the actions and terminated the employee over the weekend.

As the report notes, Lazard’s website says it aims for an environment of “mutual respect”.

With details scarce, it’s tough to determine whether or not the company’s actions, which take place during a point in time where a newer, woke Wall Street is trying to clean up its “boy club” image. But its once again proof positive that gone are the days of cutting loose outside the office, because, whether you like it or not, you’re always “on the clock” one way or another.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 07:45

Bitcoin ETF Race Begins: Has Institutional Trust Returned To Crypto?

Bitcoin ETF Race Begins: Has Institutional Trust Returned To Crypto?

Authored by Prashant Jha via CoinTelegraph.com,

Seven institutional firms have filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF in the U.S., including the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock, driving optimism and higher Bitcoin prices.

With the Bitcoin halving event less than a year away, several financial giants have filed applications for a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) — a scenario last seen before the 2020 to 2021 bull run. 

Institutional interest in the sector dried up after major crypto giants such as FTX collapsed amid a prolonged crypto winter in 2022. Bitcoin and many other cryptocurrencies traded largely sideways as several crypto exchanges fell under regulatory scrutiny.

However, on news that major financial institutions such as BlackRock, Fidelity, Valkyrie and others were filing applications to list a spot Bitcoin ETF, the price of BTC recovered to over $30,000, spurring investment into the crypto market again.

Bitcoin one-month price chart. Source: CoinMarketCap

While several institutional giants have filed spot Bitcoin ETF applications with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the past, all have either withdrawn their applications or faced outright rejections from the regulator.

The SEC approved the first Bitcoin futures ETF in October 2021 — the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF — which debuted on the New York Stock Exchange on Oct. 19, 2021.

However, the spot Bitcoin ETF filing by the asset management giant BlackRock has increased the chances of the SEC approving the first spot Bitcoin ETF. That’s according to Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, who gives BlackRock a 50% chance of getting its spot Bitcoin ETF approved.

The most recent spate of ETF filings began with BlackRock’s filing with the SEC on June 16. WisdomTree, Invesco and Valkyrie also filed in the days and weeks that followed.

On June 28, ARK Invest, which previously filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF in June 2021, amended its filing to make it similar to that of BlackRock. The next day, asset manager Fidelity Investments also filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF. In total, seven institutional giants have now filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF to date.

Some industry observers believe 2023 to 2024 will be crucial for approving a spot Bitcoin ETF. Robert Quartly-Janeiro, chief strategy officer of the cryptocurrency exchange Bitrue, told Cointelegraph that the timing is right, as “inflation is rampant and the money supply is a mixed picture, interest rates are high, and businesses are seeing decent revenues, which means crypto will need to perform in an economic environment where rates and inflation are key considerations.”

Institutional trust in Bitcoin

Bitcoin has weathered the aftermath of 2022 remarkably well and recovered more than half of its price decline during the bear market, largely thanks to the continued interest of institutional investors in the asset.

Indeed, there are significantly more institutional investors in the crypto market now compared with only one year ago. Until 2022, institutions kept a safe distance from the market, with even MicroStrategy stopping its routine BTC purchases.

Many large funds and companies have become interested in cryptocurrencies and are exploring their potential to invest in them.

Despite market volatility, global institutions show a steady interest in cryptocurrencies. Bitfinex chief technology officer Paolo Ardoino told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin represents tremendous value in terms of its utility and unique nature as a perfectly scarce asset that cannot ever be debased. He said, “The most traditional financial institutions recognize that,” adding, “It’s hardly surprising that at a time of record inflation in both major industrialized economies, as well as emerging markets, that the value of Bitcoin is being better understood by markets.”

“The recent new applications for Bitcoin spot market ETFs by some of the world’s most important asset managers demonstrates that there is investor, as well as issuer demand for Bitcoin, and that will only intensify. Apart from demonstrating increased institutional demand for Bitcoin, it will also attract new retail investors and encourage broader participation,” Ardoino said.

While many institutions distanced themselves from crypto over the past year, much of that was due to the public relations disaster brought on by FTX, with bank failures further exacerbating it. Richard Gardner, CEO of Modulus, told Cointelegraph that institutions foresaw the simmering of the crypto industry, and decided to lay low and sidestep the political and public response in the aftermath of FTX, thinking they’d be able to revisit their decision before crypto surged.

“We’re at the point where they’re beginning to weigh the risk versus reward of stepping back into the fray. Most institutions will likely be far more cautious, given the FTX disaster. They’re going to largely be moved based on the regulatory environment. As governments cobble together a full regulatory regime, and as bureaucrats decide how they plan to interpret the law, institutions will gauge their response and move forward accordingly,” Gardner said.

MicroStrategy — the leading investor in Bitcoin and one of the driving forces behind institutional adoption of BTC in 2020 — has continued its Bitcoin buying spree in 2023. When the firm faced major losses as the BTC price plunged below $16,500, CEO Michael Saylor maintained it had no intention of selling and would continue to add more BTC to its treasury. MicroStrategy currently hodls 152,333 BTC acquired for roughly $4.52 billion at an average price of $29,668 per Bitcoin.

Institutional inflow revives bull run optimism

While the 2017 bull run was sparked by retail interest, the 2020 to 2021 bull run was sparked by institutional inflows, with the likes of MicroStrategy and Tesla, and multiple other publicly-listed companies adding Bitcoin to their balance sheet.

Gracy Chen, managing director at crypto exchange Bitget, told Cointelegraph that institutions would act swiftly once they observe “stable and predictable retail interest.” Chen said, “The cumulative impact of institutions outweighs that of individual investors, and, therefore, they will continue to be a driving force for the growth of cryptocurrency market capitalization.”

She also stressed that growing interest from institutions could further crypto adoption, helping to spark the next bull run:

“Analysts expect that in the event of the approval of BlackRock’s ETF application alone, there could be a twofold increase in the price of Bitcoin. Considering BlackRock’s potential institutional investor base and influence, the approval of their spot BTC ETF would have a greater impact on the crypto market growth. With their BTC spot ETF application, they will likely inspire competition among relevant financial companies. This will direct more funds from traditional markets to Web3.”

Apart from the institutional push, there have been major developments in the retail market, with Hong Kong opening the doors for crypto exchanges to offer services to retail customers. Ben Caselin, vice president at crypto exchange MaskEX, told Cointelegraph that during the previous bull run, “U.S. institutions were the primary drivers of the upsurge, but they were arguably not ready to engage deeply and behaved no different than retail, essentially chasing gains and acting on hype.”

“I expect this bull market to be Asia-driven once again, perhaps with Hong Kong at the helm for the region, but based on my personal observations on the ground, I also expect a significant push to come from the Middle East, particularly from the United Arab Emirates, Saudia Arabia and other oil-rich jurisdictions,” he added.

With the next Bitcoin halving scheduled for April 2024, the rising interest of institutional investors is seen as a bullish sign for Bitcoin’s price and the broader crypto market. Bull runs have historically started in the run-up to the Bitcoin halving event, where the amount of BTC reward per block gets reduced by half every four years. The scarcity factor drives the price surge as retail traders and institutional giants rush to add to their Bitcoin portfolios.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 07:20

Judge Bars Biden Officials, Agencies From Contacting Social Media Companies

Judge Bars Biden Officials, Agencies From Contacting Social Media Companies

In an order fittingly issued on Independence Day, a federal judge in Louisiana has forbidden multiple federal agencies and named officials from having any contact with social media companies with the intent to moderate content.  

The preliminary injunction arises from a suit filed by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with individuals that include two leading critics of the Covid-19 lockdown regime — Harvard’s Martin Kulldorff and Stanford’s Jay Bhattacharya — and Jim Hoft, who owns the right-wing website Gateway Pundit. 

“If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history,” wrote US District Judge Terry A. Doughty. “The plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has used its power to silence the opposition.”

The dozens of people and agencies bound by the injunction include President Biden, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control, the Treasury Department, State Department, the US Election Assistance Commission, the FBI and entire Justice Department, and the Department of Health and Human Services. 

Bhattacharya and Kulldorff, who are among the originators of the Great Barrington Declaration that denounced the lockdown regime, have been victims of social media censorship. For example, the pair says their censorship-triggering statements included assertions that “thinking everyone must be vaccinated is scientifically flawed,” questioning the value of masks, and stating that natural immunity is stronger than vaccine immunity. 

While the case is dominated by Covid-19 censorship, it also encompasses the Justice Department’s efforts to suppress reporting about Hunter Biden’s “laptop from hell” in the run-up to the 2020 election. Doughty gave credence to that accusation. 

The injunction represents a major validation of accusations that government officials have colluded with social media platforms to suppress speech that counters official narratives, with the restraints falling almost exclusively on conservative viewpoints.  

The authors of the Great Barrington Declaration: Harvard’s Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Oxford’s Dr. Sunetra Gupta and Stanford’s Dr Jay Bhattacharya 

“The evidence thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario,” wrote Doughty in a 155-page ruling. “During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’.”

“The White House defendants made it very clear to social-media companies what they wanted suppressed and what they wanted amplified,” wrote Doughty. “Faced with unrelenting pressure from the most powerful office in the world, the social-media companies apparently complied.”

Doughty quoted communications from administration officials to social media company employees, saying they represent “examples of coercion exercised by the White House defendants.” Here’s a small sampling:

  • “Cannot stress the degree to which this needs to be resolved immediately. Please remove this account immediately.”
  • To Facebook: “Are you guys fucking serious? I want an answer on what happened here and I want it today.” 
  • “This is a concern that is shared at the highest (and I mean highest) levels of the WH”
  • “Hey folks, wanted to flag the below tweet and am wondering if we can get moving on the process of having it removed. ASAP

The judge noted that the badgering came simultaneous with threats of changing the social media regulation scheme, and that those threats had extra credibility since they came as the Democrats controlled the White House and Congress. 

Federal District Judge Terry Doughty speaks at his 2017 confirmation hearing (YouTube)

The accusation that the social media platforms and government were acting in concert is substantiated by the communication and bureaucracy that surrounded the endeavor. “Many emails between the White House and social-media companies referred to themselves as ‘partners.’ Twitter even sent the White House a ‘Partner Support Portal’ for expedited review of the White House’s requests,” wrote Doughty, a 2017 Trump nominee. 

A long list of agencies and people are now barred from contacting social media platforms with “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”

“If there is a bedrock principal underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable,” wrote Doughty.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 06:55

Are You Gambling With Your Retirement Account?

Are You Gambling With Your Retirement Account?

Authored by MN Gordon via EconomicPrism.com,

And just like that.  The year is half over.  Can you believe it?

Hardly the blink of an eye ago we were putting the final touches on our one great big nasty prediction for 2023 – that China will invade Taiwan.

Of course, this hasn’t come true – yet.  And, quite frankly, we hope it doggone never does.  But with fools like Anthony Blinken in charge, the unthinkable could become a reality.

Certainly, the stock market, as measured by the S&P 500, has performed well.  As of market close on Thursday (June 29), the S&P 500 is up 14.51 percent year-to-date.  Not bad.

But the real action is over in the technology sector.  Year-to-date, the NASDAQ is up 29.86 percent.  Did you capitalize on it?

If not, you may still have a good shot at easy stock market returns over the next six months.  That’s what research by Thomas Lee, founder of Fundstrat Global Advisors, says. As reported by MarketWatch:

“In the 22 instances when the S&P 500 finished the first half of the year more than 10 percent higher since 1950, the median return for the second half is 8 percent with a 82 percent win ratio.

“Among the nine instances when the S&P 500 ended negative in the prior year but recorded an over 10 percent gain in the first half of the following year, the median return for the second half is 12 percent with a 89 percent win ratio.  That implies the gauge [the S&P 500] could finish 2023 at around 4,900.”

What’s not to like about returns and win ratios like these?

By Lee’s research, you have nearly a nine in ten chance of pocketing a median return of 12 percent between now and the end of the year.  All you must do is buy the S&P 500 index.

That’s more than double the return you can get from 6-month Treasury bills, which are currently yielding 5.43 percent.

DOW 900,000?

Whereas the S&P 500 and NASDAQ have delivered double-digit returns over the first half of the year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has returned a meagre 2.94 percent.  But not to worry.  Instead of taking a half year horizon, all you must do to make money in the DOW is ride it out for a half century.

According to Ron Baron, the chairman and CEO of Baron Capital Management, the DOW could surpass 900,000 in 50 years.  The only catch, however, according to Baron, is persistent inflation might make everything “twice as expensive” over the next 14 or 15 years.

Baron’s rationale appears to extrapolate out the DOW’s trajectory since 1970.  Over the last 50 years, he notes the DOW has delivered a 35X return.  Thus, he projects another 35X return over the next 50 years.  That’s what he recently told CNBC:

“I expect inflation to be as it always has been, as it always has been in every single democracy that’s ever existed, 4-to-5 percent per year.  That means you’re going to have 35 times your money over the next 50 years.  That means that the Dow Jones, which is now 34,000, will be 900,000.

“I think everything [with respect to consumer prices] is going to be twice as expensive in 14, 15 years.  Maybe it will go a little bit lower, but it’s not going to stay lower.”

Do you follow Baron’s logic?

Every prospectus out there will tell you that ‘past performance is no guarantee of future results.’  Yet, that’s exactly what he appears to be banking on.

Will he be right?  Will he be wrong?

Only time will tell.

Where Valuations Stand

Here at the Economic Prism, we don’t know what will happen over the next half year, let alone the next half century.  But what we do know is that there will be many unexpected surprises.

Predictions about the future trajectory of the stock market are hardly scientific.  There’s no, all things being equal, observable phenomena taking place that can be tested and repeated.

Maybe the S&P 500 will deliver a 12 percent return over the next half year.  Maybe the DOW will hit 900,000 over the next half century.  However, it may not be a very pleasant ride.

Certain research and projections of past performance – like those mentioned above – may conclude stocks are going up.  Nonetheless, there are valuation metrics that offer warning signals of a possible future storm.  These warning signals suggest that now may be a wise time to hunker down.

One valuation metric, for example, is the Buffett Indicator.  Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett once called it, “probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment.”

Currently, the Buffett Indicator, which is the ratio of the total market capitalization over gross domestic product, is over 167 percent.  Specifically, at market close on Thursday, the Total Market Index, as measured by the Wilshire 5000, is at $44.38 trillion.  This is over 167 percent of the last reported U.S. GDP of about $26.53 trillion.

A fairly valued market is a ratio somewhere between 75 and 90 percent.  Anything above 115 percent is considered significantly overvalued.

For perspective, in March 2000, the Buffett Indicator hit 148 percent just before the S&P 500 collapsed 49 percent.  Before that, the Buffett Indicator registered a mere 110 percent in September 2007, in advance of the S&P 500 crashing 56 percent.

More recently, the Buffett Indicator hit a nosebleed 211 percent in December 2021.  If you recall, the S&P 500 peaked out at that time and then declined by roughly 24 percent over the following 9 months.

Are You Gambling with Your Retirement Account?

Who knows what will happen next.  Maybe the Buffett Indicator will make another run at 200 percent.  Regardless, at 167 percent, it is a warning that the stock market is significantly overvalued.

In short, there are only two ways for these sky-high valuations to come down.  GDP must either go up.  Or market capitalization must come down.

The advanced estimate for Q2 GDP will not be released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis until July 27.  However, the third estimate for Q1 GDP was recently published, which showed GDP increased at an annual rate of 2 percent during the quarter, to $26.53 trillion.

At this rate of growth, a meaningful dent will not be made in the significantly overvalued level of the Buffett Indicator.  That’s not to say that market capitalization cannot still go up, and that the stock market cannot become even more overvalued.  It has happened before.

Still, the risk reward proposition of betting on a higher market capitalization at this point isn’t very appealing.  Not when you can buy a 6-month Treasury bill that’s yielding 5.43 percent.

Over the last 40 years there generally haven’t been many instances where it has paid to be bearish.  In advance of Black Monday, October 19, 1987, was a good time to be bearish.  So, too, in early-2000, mid-2008, early-2020, and late-2021.  Now, also appears to be a good time to be bearish.

A stock market crash may not be immediately imminent.  Yet, the reality is, the stock market is poised for a significant decline.

At the same time, a lot of good people have their retirement accounts fully invested in the stock market.  At present valuations, this is analogous to gambling.

Are you gambling with your retirement account?

*  *  *

Is Joe Biden secretly provoking China to attack Taiwan?  Are your finances prepared for such madness?  Answers to these important questions can be found in a unique Special Report.  You can access a copy here for less than a penny.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 06:30

Pump The Brakes On The AI Hype?

Pump The Brakes On The AI Hype?

Authored by Fan Yu via The Epoch Times,

The hype, as they say, is real with AI…

Everyone is bullish on the potential created by generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and its slew of competitors and alternative contenders. When ChatGPT was released late last year, more than 100 million users signed up within two months. Since then, Alphabet Inc. (Google’s parent company) redoubled efforts to develop its own version called Bard. Shares of chipmaker Nvidia Corp. are up almost 200 percent since Jan. 1 due to the importance of its products to the AI sector.

All of this has created some hyperbolic declarations from experts. Some consider the current AI movement the beginning of the so-called fourth industrial revolution, as important or more impactful than the internet itself. Millions of jobs could be overtaken by AI bots, and many companies investing in this space will be minted while many companies could be wiped out. Professions from Hollywood scriptwriters to corporate lawyers could eventually be replaced by AI applications.

AI has singlehandedly led the Nasdaq Composite’s significant gain of 32 percent through June 30, during a period of high inflation and high interest rates—typically anathema to growth-focused tech stocks. Never mind that the U.S. economy is staring at the largest economic contraction since 2008.

Which brings me to my question: is the hype too much?

To be sure, ChatGPT is very impressive. And the technology behind it holds immense potential. I’ve used it to help draft a recommendation letter for a younger colleague for business school. The result is a passable missive, but certainly nothing too inspired.

But at the moment, it feels very much a novelty. Certainly not able to replace millions of jobs or become “world-changing.” It may be possible, but certainly not a foregone conclusion as the experts would have you believe.

I’m reminded of the most recent technology hype before ChatGPT: the metaverse. And then slightly before that, the blockchain.

The blockchain was supposed to be revolutionary, changing the way the world conducts business. Everything from banking, payments, accounting, to real estate would be revolutionized by the distributed ledger technology. Decentralized exchanges would eventually replace centralized stock exchanges and networks.

That was all the rage five years ago. A little-known ice tea beverage company on Long Island changed its name to Long Blockchain Inc. and announced that it would begin investing in and implementing blockchain and cryptocurrencies in its business. Its stock price immediately shot up.

Deloitte’s 2021 Global Blockchain Survey revealed that 80 percent of all companies believe blockchain would enable new revenue streams. And that if you’re a business leader and you’re not implementing blockchain, then you’re missing out and the world is passing you by.

Today, it’s safe to say that blockchain has not revolutionized much. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are still around. But aside from a few proofs of concept, no company’s fortunes have been materially changed by implementing blockchain technology.

And the fate of Long Blockchain? The firm was delisted from Nasdaq and in 2021 the Securities and Exchange Commission filed insider trading charges against a few major shareholders of the company.

Metaverse was another recent hype. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg believed so much in the potential of virtual worlds that the company changed its corporate name to Meta Platforms.

Proponents believed we’d all be wearing VR headsets and holding meetings in virtual worlds, buying virtual products such as NFTs and virtual homes, and owning a stable of avatars in game worlds with their own economies. If you believe in that future, then the economic promise of the metaverse is immense. And unlike the reality we live in, there can be an unlimited number of virtual worlds to populate and live in, limited only by computing power and one’s imagination.

But sitting in 2023, the outlook on the metaverse is decidedly different.

Since its name change was announced in October 2021, Meta’s stock price has declined 13 percent through June 30. And that’s after a tremendous 138 percent increase during year-to-date 2023.

A survey released prior to the Game Developers Conference earlier this year unveiled that 45 percent of game developers—the people and companies behind metaverse’s development—felt that “the metaverse concept will never deliver on its promise.” Ouch.

Want another example of an unfulfilled promise? The 3-D printing industry. Some experts thought by now every family would have a 3-D printer—as ubiquitous as a microwave oven—delivering household items on demand such as food (chicken nuggets) and replacement parts (drill bits).

But nearly a decade after the initial advent of 3-D printing, the technology still only occupies a niche corner of the manufacturing industry.

These examples aren’t to state that AI won’t be as revolutionary as some experts suggest. There are a lot of discussions about this technology across companies and governments. Further investments, development, technological consensus, and above all, regulatory oversight and moral clarity on necessary guardrails are needed.

At the moment, AI’s risks are as massive as its potential. We won’t know until ten years later whether AI’s impact is more akin to the internet or the Google Glass.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 05:45

Visualizing Gold Price And US Debt (1970-2023)

Visualizing Gold Price And US Debt (1970-2023)

Gold has long been considered a store of value and a hedge against economic uncertainty.

Over the past five decades, its price has been closely intertwined with concerns surrounding the growing U.S. public debt.

In the graphic below, Visual Capitalist’s Bruno Venditti, using data from In Gold We Trust and the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, explores the relationship between gold price and the U.S. national debt.

A $31T Government Debt

The U.S. national debt is the amount of money the federal government has borrowed to cover the outstanding balance of expenses incurred over time.

Every fiscal year, if spending exceeds revenue, the federal government borrows money by selling marketable securities such as Treasury bonds, bills, notes, floating rate notes, and Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) to cover the deficit.

The American public debt has risen annually since 1970, except in 2000, when it decreased by 2% due to factors like robust growth and a budget surplus.

Over the last few decades, the national debt has grown from around $370 million in 1970 to an all-time high of $31.4 trillion in 2023, recently sparking the debate in Congress to increase the debt ceiling to avoid a potential default.

The number is even higher if considering federal unfunded liabilities. Those are future financial obligations that the government has committed to but lacks sufficient funds to fully cover, such as Social Security and Medicare. Taking those into consideration, the current present value of the fiscal imbalance is $244.8 trillion, almost 10 times the current U.S. GDP.

U.S. Debt’s Implication on Gold Prices

A rising US debt often leads to concerns about inflation. When a government accumulates a significant amount of debt, it may resort to measures such as printing more money or increasing government spending, potentially leading to inflationary pressures. In such situations, investors may turn to gold as a hedge against inflation.

In addition, as the federal debt levels rise, investors may become wary of the stability of financial markets and seek safe-haven assets such as gold.

Although the price of gold tends to rise as U.S. debt increases, numerous other factors can also influence the market, including market sentiment, central bank policies, and global economic conditions.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/05/2023 – 04:15