California residents have experienced the steepest rise in electricity costs in the nation, with average bills climbing 39% over the past six years, according to UC Berkeley’s Haas Energy Institute. Researchers link the surge to wildfire-related expenses and long-standing policy decisions that shifted more costs onto consumers, according to the NY Post.

“I represent a working-class district in Orange County, and constant utility rate increases mean incessant pressure for constituents to make ends meet,” Assemblymember Tri Ta told The Center Square.

He added, “I am very concerned about the cost of utilities in California. The main driver of our high costs are public policy decisions that were made long before I joined the Legislature but am tackling now.”

The Post writes that the increases come on top of California’s already high living costs, with families spending about $30,000 more than the national average on basic needs, according to the Transparency Foundation.

Analysts say utilities have been allowed to pass wildfire prevention and recovery expenses, infrastructure upgrades, and renewable energy investments directly to customers. Subsidies for rooftop solar have also shifted costs onto households without panels, according to UC Berkeley professor Severin Borenstein.

Elsewhere in the country, electricity prices generally tracked inflation from 2019 to 2025 or even declined. States such as Arizona, Minnesota, Missouri, Tennessee, Mississippi, and North Carolina saw increases of just 1%, while rates fell in Nevada, Iowa, Alaska, Kansas, and South Carolina, the study found.

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

This isn’t “Capitalism,” it’s Model Collapse ushering in the inevitable conflagration.

One of the most peculiar hyper-normalized hallucinations about “Capitalism” is that markets and the economy “should always go up” and if they don’t, something is terribly wrong and somebody better do something to fix it.

Remarkably, this hyper-normalized hallucination is the exact opposite of real-world “Capitalism,” which relies on the periodic clearing of excesses of debt, leverage and speculation as its essential mechanism of self-correction and adaptation. If these are stripped out, “Capitalism” fails as a system.

The two charts of the NASDAQ stock index below illustrate the astounding divide between a real-world understanding of “Capitalism” and the hyper-normalized hallucination of always goes up “Capitalism.”

Various justifications are trotted out to support the “markets and GDP should always go up” narrative:

1. There’s always a Bull Market somewhere. In other words, the market and “growth” are always going up somewhere, and so rotating out of flat sectors into growing sectors enables markets to always go up.

2. The economy can no longer survive a market crash or recession, and so we can’t allow either to happen. Spoiler alert: If the market and economy cannot survive self-correction, then “Capitalism” as a system has already failed.

3. The Federal Reserve has mastered the art of manipulating–oops, I mean managing–the market and economy via adjusting the dials of liquidity, stimulus, money supply, cost of credit, etc. As a happy result of their god-like financial powers, markets and GDP will never go down again, barring an alien invasion or asteroid strike.

These justifications overlook the need for systems to self-correct self-reinforcing excesses that reflect the inevitable self-reinforcing human emotions: greed / confidence and doubt / fear: soaring markets generate demand for more credit and leverage to boost higher risk gambles which in the euphoria of the bubble are perceived as guaranteed to win rather than guaranteed to fail.

Given that the core functions of capitalism require feedback that correct / clear excesses, these justifications are incoherent. Dynamic systems such as capitalism don’t remain in a steady state; they are constantly in motion, and humanity’s herd instinct and built-in attraction to windfalls will inevitably generate the madness of crowds which then generate excesses of borrowing, leverage, risk and speculation, all of which must be reset via market crashes and recessions.

If corrective market crashes and recessions are not allowed (via ever higher stimulus, moral-hazard backstops of the biggest gamblers, etc.), then the system becomes increasingly brittle and dependent on hallucinations such as “markets can always go up, and so they should always go up.”

Actually, excesses must be wiped out to enable markets and economies to reset organically rather than kept aloft by centrally organized manipulation. The forest fire analogy explains this: routine, periodic fires burn off the deadwood that piles up in a forest, clearing space for new growth. If these healthy fires are suppressed, the deadwood (debt, leverage, speculation, moral hazard) reach dangerous extremes: when a fire finally ignites, the conflagration consumes the entire forest.

This is how markets clear excesses of speculation and risk: they crash 80% and reset over a period of years. Though the crash is naturally viewed as disastrously bearish by those absorbing the losses, it’s ultimately bullish for the economy and market, as suppressing the self-correction generates system collapse.

This is how the incoherent, system-failure hallucination views this bullish process: quick, do more of what crippled the system to maintain the illusion that “Capitalism” is “markets always go up.”

This isn’t “Capitalism,” it’s Model Collapse ushering in the inevitable conflagration.

*  *  *

My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition). Introduction (free). Check out my updated Books and Films. Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com. Subscribe to my Substack for free.

Building on Goldman analyst Scott Feiler’s note last week that consumer trends remain resilient despite ongoing K-shaped concerns, Brooke Roach, a Managing Director in Equity Research at Goldman covering the U.S. retail sector, published a consumer note on Tuesday analyzing recent store-traffic trends across income and ethnicity cohorts.

“We remain constructive on the off-price sector, and believe the industry is structurally well-positioned to benefit from trade down activity, a healthier middle-income consumer, and modest AUR growth as a result of tariff-related pricing increases at full-price retail,” Roach told clients.

She said, “Our checks indicate trends remain solid across the group, though we do note relatively more muted momentum at BURL.” She added, “We see the strongest momentum for ROST and TJX into F4Q results.”

A key chart Roach highlighted showed that off-price store traffic was primarily driven by low-income consumers, but that shifted sharply as trade-down activity accelerated among higher-income shoppers through late 2025.

Feiler recently noted, “It seems like consumer trends are still solid. It’s not a clean sweep, but we’re seeing January growth as strong, or stronger than December for most companies we have heard from.”

On Friday, the latest data from the Federal Reserve showed 2025 closed with a surprising surge in consumer credit. However, retail sales data for December, released on Tuesday, disappointed, as fears about a fragile consumer economy returned.

Roach’s key takeaway: off-price retailers should remain solidly performing this year as consumer trade-down behavior persists and K-shaped fears mount.

Read more about Feiler’s consumer spending trends (here). And of course, Professional subscribers can learn more about the consumer trends on our new Marketdesk.ai portal​​​​.

Via American Greatness,

Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) has broken ranks with Democratic leadership and has come out in favor of requiring photo ID for voting in elections across the nation.

Fetterman appeared on the Fox News program “Sunday Morning Futures” yesterday and told host Maria Bartiromo that voter ID wasn’t an “unreasonable” requirement, saying, “It’s not a radical idea for regular Americans to show your ID to vote.”

Fetterman’s right

Who agrees? https://t.co/vFUfyQgFPQ

— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) February 9, 2026

Fetterman pointed to states like Wisconsin that have similar protections requiring proof of citizenship for federal voter registration and photo ID at the polls.

He noted that 60% of voters in Wisconsin support such safeguards, despite having elected liberal justice Susan Crawford in 2025 to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

House Republicans plan to vote this week on the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act with national polls showing 83% of Americans support the measure, including 71% of Democrats.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries continued to decry the SAVE America Act as “voter suppression” and accused President Trump and GOP leadership of trying to steal the upcoming midterm elections by nationalizing them.

Dana Bash: 71% of your fellow Democrats support requiring an ID to vote. Why are they wrong?

Hakeem Jeffries (D): Republicans are engaging in voter suppression!.. Trump is trying to steal the election!

Elected Dems oppose the will of Americans.pic.twitter.com/tFoNR5Kv2T

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 8, 2026

Fetterman rejected comparisons of the SAVE America Act to resurrecting Jim Crow laws as Democratic leaders have claimed.

The Pennsylvania Senator also broke with his party leadership on the issue of funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which is expected to run out on Friday unless lawmakers can break a deadlock.

Fetterman came down on the side of border enforcement and said he does not support shutting down the government, saying, “I don’t ever want to vote to shut our government down again.”

Fetterman told Bartiromo that he expects Democrats and Republicans to remain divided beyond Friday’s funding deadline.

🚨 HOLY SH*T! Senator John Fetterman just WENT ROGUE on his own party and DROPPED TRUTH BOMBS about voter ID!

On Fox with Maria Bartiromo, Fetterman straight-up said:

“And now me, as a Democrat, I do not believe that it’s unreasonable to show I.D. just to vote.”

He kept… pic.twitter.com/AR9P2AZLEx

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) February 8, 2026

Starting on Friday, we have seen a sudden reversal from panic-selling to panic-buying in tech stocks, which has lifted Nasdaq back above its 100DMA…

The headline-grabbing culprit for much of the pain to the downside was Software stocks (IGV as an example of an ETF that tracks the sector), which collapsed as specifically SaaS firms faced ‘existential threats’ from AI disruption.

That snapped Software valuations down dramatically…

And, suddenly – starting Friday morning – buyers appeared to snap up these newly cheap stocks…

Inflows into IGV – the Software ETF – have soared…

But, the question has been – who’s buying?

Well now we have the answer, thanks to Vanda Research:

1M rolling net retail inflows into the iShares Software ETF (IGV) surged to a record $176mn as of close yesterday, more than double the prior peak seen during the late-2024 software drawdown.

This is one of the more aggressive episodes of retail dip-buying in tech, and especially software, that we’ve observed in our dataset.

Vanda also notes that Amazon ranked as the most bought US stock by retail investors, displacing Nvidia in the last few sessions.

Last Friday, AMZN recorded its largest single-day of net retail buying since Aug 2024.

We also saw decent follow-through buying throughout the session yesterday.

This is in keeping with the theme that retail investors have been opportunistically buying the dip in mega-cap tech after any earnings-driven sell-offs (also seen in MSFT, GOOGL etc.).

The question is – can retail maintain this momentum long enough to get hedgies re-engaged in Software from their near-record low exposure levels

With Republicans demanding election integrity, and Democrats demanding ICE reform, it looks like the Department of Homeland Security may shut down again on Friday after Democratic leaders rejected a White House-backed GOP counterproposal to keep the lights on – which may require a short-term stopgap if they can’t agree on something by Friday. 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said the GOP proposal is “woefully inadequate” and shows the White House “is clearly not open to” several Democratic priorities aimed at tightening oversight of immigration enforcement.

Jeffries said the offer failed to address requirements for judicial warrants, detention center standards, independent investigations and excessive-force rules. Asked whether the administration would support a ban on federal agents wearing masks, Jeffries said, “That’s an open question.”

“They don’t appear to be open to … ensuring that ICE agents are identifiable in a manner consistent with every other law enforcement agency in the country,” Jeffries said, according to Politico. 

According to the Department of Homeland Security, a government shutdown would make the country less secure, affecting TSA, FEMA, ICE, and Border Patrol operations. Acting ICE Director Lyons said that task forces targeting terrorism and transnational crime would be hit hardest. 

According to Polymarket, there’s currently a 74% chance of a shutdown by Saturday. 

Jeffries’ comments followed a late Monday joint statement with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), in which the two Democrats criticized the GOP response as lacking both legislative text and meaningful detail.

“The initial GOP response is both incomplete and insufficient in terms of addressing the concerns Americans have about ICE’s lawless conduct,” the leaders said. “Democrats await additional detail and text.”

The White House counteroffer on DHS funding is woefully inadequate.

Try again. pic.twitter.com/k5JIUjXLpW

— Hakeem Jeffries (@RepJeffries) February 10, 2026

Punchbowl News asked Jeffries about whether he things Republicans are serious about cutting a deal, to which he replied:

“It’s clear to me that House, Senate Republicans and the White House, they’re all on the run. These people are falling apart. They’re losing election after election. They’ve lost the public. Donald Trump is at historically low approval ratings … And so our view is dramatic reform is necessary with respect to DHS before a funding bill moves forward.”

Thune keeps CR on the table – conditionally

Republicans, meanwhile, are trying to keep negotiations alive while acknowledging the clock is running out. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said Tuesday that negotiations aren’t dead, but GOP leadership is contemplating next steps if talks don’t advance quickly.

“There are things I think on probably both sides that are non-negotiables,” Thune said. “But I do think there are a number of things in the range of common ground.”

Thune said Republicans may begin laying procedural groundwork for a short-term stopgap known as a continuing resolution (CR) – framing it as a fallback option, not a foregone conclusion – if negotiations fail to produce an agreement in time. Any shutdown-averting measure would require support from at least seven Senate Democrats, he added.

The existing funding patch for DHS expires Friday. Without action, the department, which employs more than 260,000 people, would face a partial shutdown.

On the Senate floor, Schumer struck a more measured tone than Jeffries, saying Democrats “need to see more from Republicans very soon.”

“What Democrats propose is the definition of common sense,” Schumer said. “We simply want ICE to follow the same standards that most law enforcement agencies across America already follow.”

Key demands, limited overlap

While the GOP counteroffer has not been publicly detailed. But White House allies have indicated that at least one Democratic demand – requiring federal law enforcement officers to obtain judicial warrants before entering private property – is not under consideration.

Other proposals, including mask prohibitions, ID display requirements and restrictions on where ICE agents can operate, would require significant Democratic concessions to gain administration support, according to people close to the White House.

Still, the exchange of offers has given GOP leaders cautious optimism that talks could continue – particularly as senators hope to leave Washington by Thursday for the Munich Security Conference and other overseas delegations.

“It depends on whether we’re making progress or not,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) said Monday. “We’ve got some time. Hopefully people will be working to try and get something done.”

The length of any short-term funding patch, if needed, remains unresolved. GOP appropriators have pushed for at least a two-week extension, though Thune said the duration “will have to be negotiated.”

By Michael Every of Rabobank

Mr. 15%: Trump stated if Fed Chair Warsh does his job, US growth could be 15% or higher. It’s unclear if that’s annual, exceeding China’s early spurt, or over the remaining two-and-a-half years of his presidency, so higher than China today, or nominal or real. Yet the key signal for those who called Warsh a ‘hawk’ is that the Fed is going to run the economy hot. That’s as the FT notes, ‘Bash All Day, Buy All Night’, explaining “Why foreigners keep pouring money into America” despite attacking it verbally all the time.

For now, signals are ice cold and red hot. The Wall Street Journal claims ‘Job Hunters Are So Desperate That They’re Paying to Get Recruited.’ However, trucking signals point to a significant upturn ahead led by manufacturing. Already in the 15% camp is AI, where Alphabet is lining up a 100-year sterling bond sale and, as Bloomberg puts it, ‘Memory Chip Squeeze Wreaks Havoc in Markets, With More to Come.’ Relatedly, the US is reportedly to exempt Big Tech from upcoming chip tariffs, with exemptions based on FDI commitments from Taiwan’s TSMC. That shows an expected pragmatic refinement of US neo-mercantilism in line with past phases of such political economy.

In the US, AI is now being embraced by many firms in ways which may genuinely boost productivity beyond what old mindsets and models can compute. Yet not all AI is equal. Reuters warns, ‘As AI enters the operating room, reports arise of botched surgeries and misidentified body parts’; Axios adds, ‘People are using AI for legal advice and it’s driving lawyers bananas.’ So should the idea of mass unemployment in many sector: what good is 15% growth if matched with 15% unemployment?

Old-fashioned oil, and other commodity constraints, will also have something to say about 15% growth. The US military is still surging into the Middle East, as Iran is reportedly ready to “dilute” its highly enriched uranium if all sanctions lifted. Yet with fresh US guidance to ships transiting Strait of Hormuz issued, markets will have to wait and see if this ends like Venezuela or with a deal (bearish oil), or like Iraq (bullish oil).

Mr. 1.5%: In Germany, Bosch is to lay off 20,000 workers as deindustrialisation snowballs, yet German rearmament continues. The latter is boosting GDP growth, but without recovery in other industries (and why assume that?), current trends project a very different German economy ahead – more so if Europe doesn’t make the weapons it rearms with. Yet as the US hands over two key NATO command posts to Europeans, ‘France and Germany’s next-generation fighter jet project is ‘dead’’.

On the broader European push to decouple from the US — as it signs up to a US critical minerals plan which implies the complete opposite— the FT reports ‘EU failing to implement economic fixes as single market withers’, and ‘European alternatives to Visa and Mastercard ‘urgently’ needed’; yet Politico claims this week will show ‘Macron sells a vision of ‘Made in Europe’ that Merz and Meloni aren’t buying’, while ‘European industry revolts over EU plan to weaken carbon border tax’ (Politico), which argues the opposite What is the EU grand macro strategy, exactly?

For now, it appears defensive in a different sense. As Politico also notes, ‘Bank of France chief’s surprise exit stokes suspicion among Macron’s opponents’, and the “Governor’s departure allows the French president to future-proof the central bank against a far-right government.” That’s as the Economist underlines that the far right, at 24%, is now the joint largest single faction across European elections.

Equally, while Europe is considering issuing more Eurobonds to back Euro stablecoins, and ‘has a plan to challenge the dollar’s global role’, “The sticking point is… changing established practices in third countries using dollars… As a next step, the Commission proposes to “obtain a better understanding of the obstacles for the Euro’s wider use, while fully respecting national choices regarding monetary arrangements.” Markets will be very happy to explain it to them.

Mr. 1.5%: UK PM Starmer said he’s “not prepared to walk away” after calls for his resignation, but that doesn’t mean he won’t be pushed by his cabinet or the Labour Party. Former Deputy Leader Rayner, under investigation for her tax affairs, briefly had a ‘Rayner for leader’ website up, showing this process is underway. Markets are unhappy about another bout of UK political instability, combined with a possible populist left policy direction ahead.

Mr. 1.5%: In Australia, the RBA just forecasted the worst medium-term economic growth ever – 1.6% annual average through to 2028. Given expected population growth, that’s almost nothing per capita. Even if it’s the Aussie opposition, not government, that’s in turmoil for now, that may not stay the case for long.

Mr. 1.5%: Canadian PM Carney is reportedly discussing the idea of an early federal election to secure a majority. That’s as Trump threatened to bar the new US-Canada bridge from opening. One can see the election platform there already. What one cannot see is a growth model that hits even 1.5% sustainably, and per capita, if US-Canada tensions remain that high.

Mrs. 1.5%: After Japanese PM Takaichi’s landslide election win, where will she go on fiscal, defence, and foreign policy – and what will the BOJ do in response? Will we see crucial, controversial constitutional change to allow for broader rearmament and military deployment? One thing is for certain: Japan will be part of the Trumponomics geoeconomic and geopolitical nexus… and does that imply it can grow at what for it would be the giddy heights of 1.5%?

What %?: China warned its banks to reduce US Treasury holdings (selling to whom?) over worries about market volatility ahead (why now when one looks at recent vol in gold and Bitcoin, etc?). It also officially banned any form of private sector CNY stablecoins from being issued, making the dividing line with soon-to-emerge US dollar stablecoins crystal clear.

What %?: The Fed’s Waller said Trump-induced crypto euphoria may be fading, Bostic said confidence in the US dollar is coming into question, and Miran added the Fed should do QE in a crisis, but not otherwise. What constitutes a crisis?

What %?: Saudi Arabia’s $925bn sovereign wealth fund is set to announce a strategy revamp that will emphasize industry, minerals, AI, and tourism, while scaling back mega projects. That kind of investment reallocation is being seen globally in most, but not all, places: what GDP growth rates will it record in doing so?

The rolling AI disruption wave, which most recently crushed the software sector, slammed insurance brokers on Monday with losses extending on Tuesday, as most names in the space slumped following reports from Reinsurance News and others that OpenAI approved the first AI insurance app on ChatGPT, built by Spanish digital insurer Tuio.

The insurance brokerage space dived 9% on average on Monday in reaction to the news: among the worst performers were Willis Towers Watson which experienced the steepest decline, its shares falling 13%. Arthur J. Gallagher dropped 9.4%, while Aon shed 8.5%. Ryan Specialty and Brown & Brown fell 8% and 7% respectively, with Marsh & McLennan also down 7%. Insurer AIG saw a more modest decline of 2%.

The market reaction came after OpenAI announced that Tuio’s app, powered by WaniWani’s AI distribution infrastructure, allows ChatGPT users to receive personalized home insurance quotes directly through conversation, with purchasing capabilities coming soon. This marks the first time an insurance provider can distribute products and offer quotes directly within an AI platform.

According to OpenAI, the new capability removes traditional friction points in insurance purchasing by eliminating forms, calls, and intermediaries. Tuio’s AI app collects relevant information through natural conversation and returns personalized quotes from regulated carriers in real time, Investing.com reported.

Some investors expressed confusion about the market reaction, questioning why commercial insurance brokers were so heavily impacted when the current application focuses on home insurance. Some argued that insurance brokers dealing with specialty products might be better insulated due to the complexity of those offerings.

Banks promptly came to the sector’s defense with Goldman underscoring the investor confusion, and writing that “the immediate feedback still is a degree on confusion & the top question is ‘Why would this primarily impact the brokers (who primarily do commercial .. think there’s only home insurance at the majors for high net worth)’ .. with a few arguing it’s 1) more negative for personal insurance carriers given greater price transparency/shopping/competition, and 2) Insurance brokers dealing in more specialty products should be better insulated given complexity.

UBS also was quick to defend, with analyst Brian Meredith saying he remains a buyer of the brokers and “views the pullback as an attractive entry point for his preferred broker names: Marsh, Goosehead Insurance and Willis Towers Watson.”

Meredith added that concerns around broker disintermediation have been around for decades, with insurance brokers still the principal means of distribution for commercial insurance products, and independent/captive agents accounting for more than two-thirds of personal lines insurance distribution. Brian said brokers remain essential intermediaries for a complex purchasing decision.

He continues to favor the insurance brokers in 2026 as he believes growth expectations have bottomed with potential upside in a good economic environment. “Valuations are attractive on a relative and absolute basis and reflect a “soft” market.”

Then again, as Goldman concludes, there’s certainly a degree of ‘don’t fight the narrative’ .. and this is all very fresh/fluid at the moment.”

And if the ongoing rout in the software space is any indication, there is much more pain to come. 

Once again, the pattern is familiar: raise taxes in California, and watch the private jets head east. 

Mark Zuckerberg may soon be adding Miami to his ever-growing list of luxury addresses. According to people familiar with his plans, the Meta founder and his wife, Priscilla Chan, are exploring a home on Indian Creek Island—an ultra-exclusive, heavily guarded neighborhood often called “Billionaire Bunker”, according to Bloomberg.

The tiny island is already packed with famous residents, including Jeff Bezos, Tom Brady, Jared Kushner, and Ivanka Trump.

With an estimated fortune north of $200 billion, Zuckerberg already owns multiple properties across California, Hawaii, Washington, D.C., and near Lake Tahoe. It’s not clear whether Florida would replace any of those homes or just become another stop on his real estate tour.

But the timing is telling. Bloomberg writes that California is considering a new wealth tax aimed at billionaires, including taxes on unrealized gains. The proposal has rattled investors and helped push several tech leaders out of the state. When Democratic policies start biting, it seems many billionaires suddenly “fall in love” with Florida.

Chamath Palihapitiya wrote on X: “With Zuck’s move to Florida, California’s total taxable wealth from billionaires has plummeted to well under $1T from over $2T just a few weeks ago. The loss of this tax revenue was totally avoidable but is now forever. All because Gavin Newsom stood motionless as this stupidly written bill, from a fringe union and a handful of socialist academics with an axe to grind, meandered its way into the public conversation without any action from him and freaked everyone out.”

“These were all people that were paying 13%+ in state income tax every year WITH NO COMPLAINTS UNTIL A FEW WEEKS AGO. And now, for the rest of time, the lost tax revenues from these folks will have to be paid for by the middle class because they are the only group left in California large enough that you can tax to fill the hole,” he continued.

With Zuck’s move to Florida, California’s total taxable wealth from billionaires has plummeted to well under $1T from over $2T just a few weeks ago.

The loss of this tax revenue was totally avoidable but is now forever. All because Gavin Newsom stood motionless as this stupidly… https://t.co/lJpzhTkMH6

— Chamath Palihapitiya (@chamath) February 10, 2026

“He’s forsaken the middle class instead of managing the budget, managing the deficit, eliminating even a portion of California’s gargantuan waste and abuse. He could have done any of these things at any point over the past 7+ years. But he was silent. And now California’s budget will implode and he wants to run for President.”

He isn’t alone in the migration. Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have recently bought expensive homes in South Florida, adding to the region’s growing reputation as Silicon Valley’s backup headquarters.

Indian Creek remains one of the most exclusive spots in the country, with private security, limited access, and a golf course at its center—perfect for executives who prefer their privacy and their taxes equally protected.

Zuckerberg has also been spending more time around former President Donald Trump, visiting Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach on several occasions.

Meanwhile, California’s proposed ballot measure would impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires to fund social programs. In response, wealthy donors have poured millions into campaigns opposing it. 

Harley-Davidson shares plunged in premarket trading after the company reported an unexpected decline in motorcycle shipments and a far deeper-than-expected sales miss in the fourth quarter. The results suggest the company is still battling soft demand, with the brand having peaked with boomers and struggling to connect with younger riders.

Global fourth-quarter bike deliveries fell 4% to 13,515 bikes versus expectations of 16,408, while revenue came in at $496 million compared with about $749 million expected (per Bloomberg Consensus estimates). The adjusted loss of $2.44 for the period was more than twice the expected amount.

In premarket trading, Harley shares plunged nearly 12%, the sharpest decline since the 16% drop on April 25, 2024. The stock is trading near Covid-era lows and not far above its 2009 trough.

CEO Arturo Pires de Lima, who took over in October, is focused on reducing excess inventory and repairing dealer relationships amid elevated interest rates that have strained consumers.

Looking at Harley’s annual revenue, there’s a clear surge in the post-Dot Com period that builds into the 2008 peak. That upswing coincided with the boomer retirement wave, as the oldest boomers became eligible for early Social Security retirement benefits in 2008.

At that time, boomers were the economy’s largest spending cohort, so it stands to reason that some of them, now retired, were buying all sorts of items that reminded them of their younger days: bikes, Packards, second and third homes and whatever else.

But note that, since 2008, annual revenue, instead of trending up and to the right, has been trending down, as the brand never solidly connected with millennials or younger generations as it did with boomers.

Harley tried electric bikes, which failed miserably. It’s in a reset period.