70.9 F
Chicago
Thursday, October 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 1026

Judge Praises Trump Over SNAP Funding, Sets Monday Deadline For Payments

0
Judge Praises Trump Over SNAP Funding, Sets Monday Deadline For Payments

A Rhode Island federal judge praised President Donald Trump’s “quick and definitive response” to a Friday order for facilitating the timely funding of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments. 

“The court greatly appreciates the president’s quick and definitive response to this court’s order and his desire to provide the necessary SNAP funding,” US District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr. (Obama) wrote in the footnote of a Saturday court order. 

The order, forcing the USDA to ensure SNAP benefits for November reach approximately 42 million Americans (around one in eight) who were facing a halt in benefits amid the government shutdown. McConnell ruled that recipients must receive their benefits by the end of Monday, Nov. 3, or that partial payments be issued no later than end-of-day Wednesday, November 5. 

“There is no question that the congressionally approved contingency funds must be used now because of the shutdown,” the judge wrote, citing contingency funds from fiscal years 2024 and 2025, along with Section 32 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1935, to justify ensuring SNAP payments are made. 

The USDA had argued that it lacks the legal authority and sufficient funds to provide full SNAP benefits for November with the shutdown in force, and contended that even if contingency funds were available,  they would not cover the full payments – while implementation of reduced benefits nationwide would be challenging from an administration standpoint.

According to lawyers for the Trump administration, $5.25 billion is currently available in the program’s contingency fund, however ensuring November payments will require at least $8.5 billion. 

McConnell’s order requires the use of all available contingency funds. 

“There is no question that the congressionally approved contingency funds must be used now because of the shutdown; in fact, the president during his first term issued guidance indicating that these contingency funds are available if SNAP funds lapse due to a government shutdown,” McConnell wrote. 

In a separate ruling last week, Boston US District Judge Indira Talwani (Obama) also ruled that the USDA must continue SNAP payments – calling the program’s suspension ‘unlawful.’

On Friday, Trump wrote on Truth social following McConell’s ruling “I do not want Americans to go hungry,” adding “[I] ask the Court to clarify how we can legally fund SNAP as soon as possible. . . . If we are given the appropriate legal direction by the Court, it will BE MY HONOR to provide the funding.”

Where it stands: The USDA has until noon on Monday to present their plan to comply. If full payments are not completed, partial payments are to follow by Wednesday as noted above. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 21:35

Trump Tariff Deal With China Opens Door For “Operation Warp Speed 2.0” To Exit Beijing’s Rare Earth Trap

0
Trump Tariff Deal With China Opens Door For “Operation Warp Speed 2.0” To Exit Beijing’s Rare Earth Trap

Two weeks after a sudden flareup over Chinese rare earth mineral exports nearly sparked another market meltdown, the issue has been resolved, at least according to the Trump admin. 

According to a fact sheet published by the White House on Saturday which outlined some details of the trade pact agreed to earlier this week by President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, China will effectively suspend implementation of additional export controls on rare earth metals and will issue general licenses valid for exports of rare earths, gallium and germanium “for the benefit of U.S. end users and their suppliers around the world” meaning the effective removal of controls China imposed in April 2025 and October 2022. The US and China previously said Beijing would suspend more restrictive controls announced in October 2025 for one year.

Washington will also pause some of Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs on China for an additional year and is halting plans to implement a 100% tariff on Chinese exports to the US that was threatened for November. The White House also said that the US will further extend the expiration of certain Section 301 tariff exclusions, currently due to expire on Nov. 29, 2025, until Nov. 10, 2026.

Meanwhile, China will also terminate investigations targeting US companies in the semiconductor supply chain, including those into Nvidia and Qualcomm, Bloomberg reported.

However, skepticism emerged about the viability of the deal after comparing the readouts of what the White House said was agreed to, and that published by Beijing: what emerges are several key disagreements, prompting some China experts to conclude that “there is no deal” and that “we’re going to be doing this again in 1-2 months.”

It also means that even a small hiccup in the already tense relations between the two countries likely means a reversion to the trade war status quo, threats of more tariffs by the US and rare earth retaliation by Beijing. 

To that point, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that despite deals, the US and its allies need to be wary of China.

“This is a problem that has been with us for several decades, it’s never been addressed with these rare earths, the rare earth magnets,” Bessent said on Fox News Sunday. “The Chinese have cornered the market, and unfortunately, at times, they proved to be unreliable partners.”

Bessent added that he hoped “we can depend on them to be more reliable partners” after the implementation of the deal. 

Later on Sunday, Trump appeared on 60 Minutes after a 5 year hiatus, and said that “I got sort of everything that we wanted,” of his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. 

“I mean, we’re doing very well with China, and hopefully they’re gonna do very well with us,” adding that China’s threat of rare earths restrictions has “gone.” 

Many hardly share Trump’s view, noting that the deal at most gives the US a 1 year period in which to launch an Operation Warp Speed 2.0 (see below) in which to boost domestic production and reroute supply chains in order to make the US self-reliant on rare earths, a massive challenge in a world where China is the defacto sole-source of refined RE.

The landmark summit between Trump and Xi, their first face-to-face meeting of the US president’s second term, saw the leaders stabilize relations in the short term after an escalating trade fight that had roiled markets and sparked fears of a global downturn.

Under their agreement, according to the White House, China agreed to pause sweeping controls on rare-earth magnets in exchange for a US agreement to roll back an expansion of curbs on Chinese companies. China had used its dominance in the processing of rare-earth minerals as leverage, threatening to restrict their flow to the US and allies countries.

The US also agreed to halve a fentanyl-related tariff to 10% from 20%, while Beijing will resume purchases of American soybeans and other agricultural products. The US has said China will buy 12 million metric tons of soybeans during the current season, and a minimum of 25 million metric tons a year for the next three years. Trump on Friday indicated he would like to remove all of the fentanyl-related tariffs if China continued to crack down on exports of the drug and precursor chemicals used to make it.  

“As soon as we see that, we’ll get rid of the other 10%,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday.

The US also said on Saturday that Beijing will take steps to allow the Chinese facilities of Dutch chipmaker Nexperia BV to resume shipments, confirming a Bloomberg report from a day earlier. This move will likely ease worries about chip shipments that had threatened auto production as a trade fight between China and the US escalated.

But as Bloomberg notes, while the agreement has calmed tensions, the pact may be a short-term truce in an extended trade fight with the measures just meant to last one year. And despite addressing some key issues – and with both sides winning key concessions – the agreement fails to comprehensively address all of the issues at the heart of the US-China trade fight and other geopolitical flashpoints such as Taiwan and Russia’s war in Ukraine.

According to an analysis by TS Lombard’s Grace Fan (available to pro subs), amid Trump’s flurry of Asia dealmaking, capped by a fresh US-China trade war détente, “the spectre of escalation remains bracingly in view, after Trump unexpectedly threw open the door to new US nuclear weapons testing for the first time in three decades to counter Russia/China.”

That said, investors can take comfort in the détente’s ‘deliverables’ as keeping a risk-on market rally on both sides of the Pacific alive, including: 1) A 10% cut in US tariffs on China aided by Chinese purchases of US soy (+25mmt/yr for 3 yrs); 2) a 1-year delay to both the expanded Chinese 9 Oct rare earth (RE) and the US 29 Sept (“Affiliates”) export controls rules; and 3) a 1-year delay of new bilateral shipping fees. Left out was Taiwan, TikTok and Nvidia’s Blackwell chips, suggesting more market upside when and if a latter deal ultimately gets greenlit as we expect.

Fan notes that aided by his Rare Earths trump card, Xi scored two big wins: 

  • Delayed US “Affiliates Rule”. This is one of the first known instances of China successfully rolling back a major US chip export control expansion but likely not the last. In a big shift owing to Trump’s transactionalism, US national security is now on the bargaining table in a way it never was before. An estimated 20,000 affiliates at least 50% owned by Chinese blacklisted entities and caught in the rule’s dragnet could be let off (e.g., Dutch-based chipmaker Nexperia), easing recent supply chain constraints for automakers among other firms.
  • Immediate 10% fentanyl tariff cut = more level playing field with ASEAN. China’s now lower tariff rate (+20% under Trump 2.0) puts it back in competition with regional exporters, making ASEAN (led by Vietnam) the relative loser here (with +19-20% “reciprocal” tariffs, +40% for transshipments). Still, keep an eye on Trump’s two recently finalized trade deals (Malaysia, Cambodia) plus “framework” agreements (Vietnam, Thailand) as new details are fleshed out.

Trump’s consolation prize are the new RE alliances plus soy purchases. According to TS Lombard, saddled by Beijing’s April 4th Rare Earth export controls, the US is arguably in a worse position now vs pre-Liberation Day. Yet Trump’s flurry of RE deals this week (Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand) offers hope that a valuable lesson may have been learnt: the only way out of the RE trap is working with allies on ‘Operation Warp Speed’ 2.0. Trump’s go-ahead for Seoul to build nuclear-powered submarines at a Philly shipyard and clarity on Korea’s $350bn FDI ($150bn for shipbuilding; US$200bn in cash capped at US$20bn/year) also sets the stage for more US reindustrialization – so long as visas are granted. 

All this keeps Trump on track for trade war de-escalation by year-end in time for the 2026 midterm election countdown in our base case. What’s still missing: a lot of fine print, USMCA renegotiations, resolution of the Brazil/India 50% tariff disputes and the looming Supreme Court tariff ruling (oral hearing: 5 Nov) that could scramble, however temporarily, Trump’s game plan.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 20:59

Energy Department Announces $100 Million In Funding To Refurbish US Coal Plants

0
Energy Department Announces $100 Million In Funding To Refurbish US Coal Plants

The Department of Energy on Friday announced a $100 million funding package to revamp the nation’s existing coal-fired power plants, in a bid to support the US coal industry. 

A former coal-fired power plant approximately 50 miles east of Pittsburgh, is being redeveloped as a natural gas-powered data center campus by the city’s redevelopment agency in Homer City, Pa. John Haughey/The Epoch Times

The DOE said in a statement that it had issued a notice of funding opportunity for “practical, high-impact projects” aimed at modernization and refurbishment – including projects designed to enhance efficiency, extend operational lifespan, and improve the performance of coal and natural gas facilities.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced that the initiative is designed to keep US coal plants running and ensure access to affordable energy (as data center energy demands are shoving working class families in the financial hurt locker). 

“For years, the Biden and Obama administrations relentlessly targeted America’s coal industry and workers, resulting in the closure of reliable power plants and higher electricity costs,” Wright said in a statement. 

“Thankfully, President [Donald] Trump has ended the war on American coal and is restoring common sense energy policies that put Americans first.”

As the Epoch Times notes further, the initiative follows the DOE’s announcement in September that it would invest $625 million in funding to expand and reinvigorate the U.S. coal industry in an effort to increase energy output.

The Trump administration is seeking to reverse the decline of coal use in the country. In April, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to “identify coal resources on federal lands, lift barriers to coal mining, and prioritize coal leasing on those lands.”

The president also directed federal agencies to “rescind any agency policies that seek to transition the Nation away from coal production or otherwise establish preferences against coal as a generation resource,” according to a White House fact sheet.

Following the order, the DOE unveiled initiatives to boost domestic coal production, including facilitating new investments in coal-powered electricity generation, commercializing coal ash conversion technologies, and designating steelmaking coal as a critical material and mineral.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) stated on July 14 that coal consumption in the U.S. power sector has decreased since the 2000s due to rising competition from natural gas and renewable energy sources, as well as stricter emissions regulations on coal-fired power plants.

The EIA projected that the total operating capacity of U.S. coal-fired power plants will drop to 145 gigawatts (GW) by the end of 2028, a decline of more than 15 percent from the 172 GW in operation as of May.

The Midwest region has 10 coal plants scheduled to retire by 2028, followed by five in the Mid-Atlantic, four in Tennessee, and three in the Northwest.

The agency noted that on a regional basis, 58 percent of the planned coal capacity retirements are in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions.

Naveen Athrappully contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 20:25

UK Train Mass Stabbing: Authorities Insist No Indication Of Terrorism

0
UK Train Mass Stabbing: Authorities Insist No Indication Of Terrorism

Update (0755ET):

Police briefly invoked “Plato,” the code for a marauding terrorist attack, but later withdrew the designation after finding no evidence of terrorism, following a mass stabbing spree aboard a high-speed LNER train traveling from Doncaster to London, carried out by two suspects, one a Black British national and the other a British national of Caribbean descent, aged 32 and 25.

British Transport Police said eleven people were hospitalized, nine of whom initially suffered life-threatening injuries. As of early Sunday, four have been discharged, while two remain in critical condition.

“British Transport Police declared a major incident yesterday, and counter-terrorism policing were initially supporting our investigation. However, at this stage, there is nothing to suggest that this is a terrorist incident,” Superintendent John Loveless told reporters earlier. 

Defence Secretary John Healey described the mass stabbing as an “isolated attack but warned about a “new era of threat.” 

Earlier, transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, told reporters that passengers would see “a high visibility presence” of police on trains and train stations “to reassure the public.” This was a similar message to the British Transport Police’s comments. 

King Charles commented on the attack:

My wife and I were truly appalled and shocked to hear of the dreadful knife attack that took place on board a train in Cambridgeshire last night. Our deepest sympathy and thoughts are with all those affected, and their loved ones. We are particularly grateful to the emergency services for their response to this awful incident.

Viewing Britain from afar, just across the Atlantic, is depressing. The rapid decline of a nation spiraling into a progressive hellhole and multicultural dystopia offers lessons for America and the America First movement.

Given that authorities downgraded the Plato designation, does this mean the two attackers just randomly started knifing train passengers at the same time? Is this now the kind of “basic” attack being normalized, or were these attackers simply “blowing off some steam”?

“If that wasn’t terrorism… then what the hell is,” former Reform deputy leader Ben Habib said in a video posted on X. 

While UK authorities twiddle their thumbs, possibly downplaying this attack (like other attacks), Britons are being arrested for social media posts.

At the same time, conservative UK activist Tommy Robinson has drawn large crowds at free speech rallies, where people are standing up to voice their concerns about the destruction of Britain, Europe, and the ongoing war on Christianity.

The prospect of civil conflict is rising:

Why are EU elites unwilling to take meaningful actions to fix societal collapse?

*   *   * Meanwhile in America, you can defend yourself

British police said 10 people have been hospitalized, nine with critical, life-threatening injuries, following a mass stabbing attack on a London-bound train Saturday evening, and that counter-terrorism police are supporting the investigation.

The attack was carried out by two unidentified suspects at 7:35 pm as the Doncaster to London King’s Cross train headed south toward Huntingdon, a market town a few miles northwest of the university city of Cambridge. The two men dressed in all-black were tasered, restrained, and taken into custody by police, according to that report.

Emergency services, including armed police and air ambulances, responded quickly as the train drew into Huntingdon. The attack appears to have been contained swiftly after the train arrived at the station, and police officers wearing forensic suits, with a police dog, could be seen on the platform.

Cambridgeshire Constabulary, the local police force, said armed police attended the incident after officers were called to the scene at Huntingdon station at 7:39 p.m. on Saturday. It added that the two people were arrested at the station, which is around 75 miles (120 kilometers) north of London.

A mad rush commenced in the train during the attack, sending bloodied riders rushing down aisles and hiding in bathrooms to avoid further carnage. The life-preserving dash led to travelers being “stamped [on] by others, according to The Times of London.

One witness stated that there was “blood everywhere” after the attack, The Times of London reported.

“They were making their way through the carriage to get away from the suspects. They were extremely bloodied,” a man using the name Gavin told Sky News.

That witness stated he saw one of the attackers on the platform with a “quite a large knife.”

“The suspect had also come off the train as well. So while we were being told to come out of the station the suspect was obviously running rampant,” Gavin told Sky News.

In a statement early Sunday, British Transport Police said two individuals have been arrested in connection with the stabbings. One of them was described on social media as “two black men.“

No motive for the attack has been given, but British terror cops were probing the incident.

“Ten people have been taken to hospital with nine believed to have suffered life-threatening injuries,” the statement said. “This has been declared a major incident and Counter Terrorism Policing are supporting our investigation whilst we work to establish the full circumstances and motivation for this incident.”

The police force also said that “Plato,” the national code word used by police and emergency services when responding to what could be a “marauding terror attack,” was initiated. That declaration was later rescinded but no motive for the attack was disclosed.

“We’re conducting urgent enquiries to establish what has happened, and it could take some time before we are in a position to confirm anything further,” Chief Superintendent Chris Casey said. “At this early stage it would not be appropriate to speculate on the causes of the incident.”

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer lamented the bloodshed and offered condolences in a social media post.  He did not say anything about the identity of the attackers for their motive.

“The appalling incident on a train near Huntingdon is deeply concerning. My thought are with those affected, and my thanks go to the emergency services for their response,” the British leader said on X.

Paul Bristow, the mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, said he had heard of “horrendous scenes” on the train.

London North Eastern Railway, or LNER, which operates the East Coast Mainline services in the U.K., confirmed the incident had happened on one of its trains and urged passengers not to travel because of “major disruption.”

An eyewitness to the attack said “We ran from the back of the train to the end as everyone was screaming to run, explaining there was somebody stabbing everyone and everything.” His conclusion recaps how so many Brits are feeling in a country they can no longer recognize, overrun with illegal immigrants: “Knowing somebody has weapons and you have nothing, knowing they’re willing to strike woman and I think children. It wasn’t the England I grew up in.”

A hero older man blocked a knife-wielding attacker from stabbing a younger girl as victims fought back with a bottle of Jack Daniels during Saturday’s UK train attack, according to a report. The unidentified man suffered gashes to his head and neck while preventing the train attackers from slaughtering a youngster on the blood-soaked LREN train from Peterborough to London, Witness Olly Foster told the BBC.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 20:15

“I Am Declining Fast”: Cancer-Striken Scott Adams Urges Trump To Help Secure Treatment; President Says “On It”

0
“I Am Declining Fast”: Cancer-Striken Scott Adams Urges Trump To Help Secure Treatment; President Says “On It”

Scott Adams, the 67-year-old Dilbert creator, will publicly ask President Donald Trump on Monday to intervene and save his life. In a post on X, Adams said he is “declining fast” from metastasized prostate cancer and needs Trump, who once offered help, to force Kaiser Permanente of Northern California to schedule a critical treatment immediately.

Kaiser has approved Adams for Pluvicto, a newly FDA-approved radioligand therapy that targets advanced prostate cancer cells, but has failed to book the brief IV infusion, according to Adams.

“My healthcare provider, Kaiser of Northern California, has approved my application to receive a newly FDA-approved drug called Pluvicto,” Adams wrote on X. “But they have dropped the ball in scheduling the brief IV to administer it and I can’t seem to fix that.”

“I am declining fast. I will ask President Trump if he can get Kaiser of Northern California to respond and schedule it for Monday,” the longtime comic writer continued. “That will give me a fighting chance to stick around on this planet a little bit longer.”

“It is not a cure, but it does give good results to many people,” he added.

Pluvicto is not a cure but has extended survival for many patients whose cancer, like Adams’, has spread to the bones and resists hormone therapy.

In May on his Coffee with Scott Adams Rumble show, the comics writer revealed the same aggressive cancer as former President Joe Biden. “My life expectancy is maybe this summer,” he said, describing constant, migrating pain and months using a walker. “Every day is a nightmare.”

Adams said he tried Ivermectin and Fenbendazole without success.
Once syndicated in 2,000 newspapers, Dilbert was canceled in 2023 after Adams’ controversial racial remarks.

In a swift response, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replied to Adams’ post: “Scott. How do I reach you? The President wants to help.”

Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya quickly followed: “Just connected you guys via text.”

Trump’s response was prompt and laconic: “on it” the president said.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 19:15

Ex-ISIS Envoy Who Killed Americans In Iraq To Be Hosted At White House This Month

0
Ex-ISIS Envoy Who Killed Americans In Iraq To Be Hosted At White House This Month

President Donald Trump is set to host Syria’s self-appointed interim leader later this month for talks in Washington, marking the first ever visit by a Syrian head of state to the US capitol. Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, who once fought alongside foreign fighters while killing American soldiers in Iraq, will enjoy his red carpet reception in Washington on November 10.

This will also mark the first time a former ISIS member will be hosted in the Oval Office, an absurdity which would have been hard to believe a mere decade ago. But the US-Saudi-Israel axis reached its regime change goal in Damascus, which overthrew the secular Arab nationalist leader Bashar al-Assad, which resulted in the Islamist Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) taking over.

The attempted rebrand, via AP/CNN

The HTS leader Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, who was even earlier this year still on the US terrorism list, quickly reverted to his birth name of Ahmed al-Sharaa. The US had promptly removed the $10 million bounty on his head just before President Trump met with him in Riyadh last May.

“President Ahmed al-Sharaa will be at the White House at the start of November,” Syria’s foreign minister said in speech in Bahrain. “Of course, this is a historic visit. It is the first visit by a Syrian president to the White House in more than 80 years.”

“There will be many issues on the table, starting with the lifting of sanctions and opening of a new chapter between the United States and Syria. We want to establish a very strong partnership between the two countries.”

One area of proposed cooperation is in fighting terrorism, ironically enough, and the US and Syria under Jolani are expected to sign an agreement joining a US-led international coalition against ISIS during the visit, which is somewhat laughable given ISIS patches have recently been seen among HTS ranks.

A 2024 CNN article admitted the following:

Despite attempts to distance his group from extremist organizations, the United States still designated his new group a terror organization and targeted members of HTS who once fought for Al Qaeda, proving his rebranding attempts a failure.

And NBC too underscored Jolani’s ISIS pedigree soon after he ousted Assad in December 2024:

Born in Syria in 1982, he joined other foreign fighters in Iraq after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, and was detained by the American military, according to The Associated Press.

When Syria’s vicious civil war erupted in 2011, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, leader of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), sent Jolani to Syria to establish the Al-Nusra Front, a branch of Al Qaeda.

Their conflict escalated two years later. Jolani rejected Baghdadi’s calls to dissolve the Nusra Front and merge it with ISI to form ISIS. Instead, he pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda, which later disassociated itself from ISIS. The Nusra Front then became Al Qaeda’s Syria affiliate and later battled ISIS for supremacy in the battle against Assad.

His aforementioned ruling Islamist faction HTS has since taking control in Damascus been conducting sectarian attacks on ethno-religious minorities in Syria. Thousands of Alawites, Druze, and Christians have been killed and/or driven from their homes.

All the while, Sharraa has sought to claim before international cameras that he’ll ensure equality for non-Muslims as well as women, but the actions of his HTS gangs are the opposite.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 18:05

Taiwan Wants To Be The Israel Of Asia & Its D.C. Lobby Is Growing

0
Taiwan Wants To Be The Israel Of Asia & Its D.C. Lobby Is Growing

Authored by J.D. Hester via AntiWar.com,

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the arm of Israel’s foreign propaganda mission in the United States, recently made an unprecedented mission to the island of Taiwan. At the 2025 Minyan Mission, President Lai Ching-te prostrated himself to the lobby by comparing Israel and Taiwan to the “spirit of David against Goliath in standing up to authoritarian coercion.”

In reality, the governments of Israel and Taiwan both have a long history of acting more like Goliath than David. They are also similar in the sense that they are both instruments of the American empire, a costly endeavor robbing Americans of economic and political freedom. To understand why Taiwan is trying to frame itself in the minds of American elites as the “Israel of Asia,” it is important to recognize why Israel and the United States became so codependent to begin with.

Via Reuters

The United States and Israel have collaborated since the founding of the state of Israel. The relationship between both countries became one of convenience during the Cold War as the Soviet Union generally favored the Arab nations in the region over Israel. Evangelical Americans, prominent in the government at all levels, also see Israel as religiously significant. After the Cold War, the United States and Israel continued to collaborate with both having a common enemy in numerous Muslim states. However, Israel also began an influence campaign in the United States to ensure that they would always have the support of the world’s foremost superpower.

Domestically, AIPAC and other groups were able to foster bipartisan support for the state of Israel via lobbying. In exchange for funding both Republicans and Democrats, American politicians who receive funding from the Israel lobby are expected to maintain a pro-Israel position. AIPAC boasts about its power with the organization proudly supporting “361 pro-Israel Democratic and Republican candidates in 2024 with more than $53 million in direct support through AIPAC.” The organization also boasts a 96% election rate and defeated 24 candidates who they stated would have “undermined” US-Israel relations. In total, Israel has received $300 billion in aid adjusted for inflation due largely to its lobbying efforts. Understandably, Taiwan would also want similar support from the US to bolster its geopolitical aims.

Numerous researchers have compared the efforts of the Taiwan lobby to that of the pro-Israel lobby in terms of “composition, aspirations, and operations.” Both Israel and Taiwan use the narrative of an “existential threat” to garner support from the United States. While Israel claims Iran poses a major threat to the security of the nation, Taiwan claims that China poses a similar threat.

A 2021 report found that, in 2019, $4.97 million was spent on agents working for the Taiwan lobby. With this funding, pro-Taiwan organizations contacted nearly 90% of Congress. The lobby directly spent $156,794 on individual campaign contributions that year. Most damningly, twice the lobby contributed money to congresspeople on the same day they met with these lobby agents. Like the Israel lobby, the Taiwan lobby also invites congresspeople on free trips, including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. While the Taiwan lobby might not have as much power as the Israel lobby, it has nevertheless secured meaningful support from the US government because of its efforts.

Throughout the years, the United States has sold over $50 billion in arms and related services to the Taiwanese government. However, in fiscal year 2024, the US has also given the Indo-Pacific region $2 billion in free military aid with much of this aid presumably going to Taiwan. Like Israel, Taiwan also conducts joint military training with the US.

This level of cooperation between Taiwan and the US is extremely dangerous. If the US got involved in a hypothetical Chinese invasion on the side of Taiwan, we could risk another Russia-Ukraine war or even outright nuclear war. Neither is in the interests of US taxpayers who already give their dollars to foreign governments like Israel for nothing in return except for more lengthy wars. Foreign aid only serves to drain the resources of our government and entangle us in conflicts we have no business being involved in.

Israel and Taiwan are “Goliaths” in their neighborhoods of the world due to support from the United States. In contrast, the “Davids” are the people of the United States robbed by foreign powers and groups, like the Palestinians, slaughtered by Washington-funded proxies. Until the US is truly free from the influence of foreign lobbyists and the self-imposed responsibility of policing the globe, the American people will never be free. Those who claim to be non-interventionists or “America First” should oppose making Taiwan the Israel of the South China Sea.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 17:30

Mainstream Continues Turning On Zelensky, As Politico Documents ‘Dark Side’ Of His Rule

0
Mainstream Continues Turning On Zelensky, As Politico Documents ‘Dark Side’ Of His Rule

As we’ve for many months been documenting, the Western mainstream media continues the trend of turning on Ukraine, and on President Zelensky in particular, now that it’s clear that ‘victory’ against Russia will not be a reality. It seems that every time Ukraine’s military suffers major setback and defeat at a strategic location in the east – as is again unfolding currently – the unusually ‘negative’ MSM articles suddenly appear.

It wasn’t very long ago, and especially during the opening couple years of war, the MSM treated any criticisms of Zelensky or the Ukrainian Army as totally off-limits. This was the comically absurd era of concert halls in Europe canceling famous classical Russian ballads, or op-eds calling for reading courses to ban Dostoevsky. But fast-forward to late 2025 and Politico is out with a story entitled The dark side of Zelenskyy’s rule.

The story documents how Ukrainian society, and especially what’s left of the ‘accepted opposition’ (after long ago Zelensky banned all opposition political parties deemed too ‘pro-Russian’ in a country where some one-third of the population has Russian as their first language) is slowly turning on the US/EU-backed leader.

Discontent has boiled to the public surface on a variety of issues of late including harsh recruitment policies which has seen officers throw unsuspecting men on the street into vans, and then there’s Zelensky’s personal efforts which sought to ban top corruption investigative institutions (later reversed after severe censure from the public and Western countries), and most recently there’s the political persecution of Zelensky’s enemies. 

Execution of the war itself has also been a source of immense controversy, especially after in early 2024 President Zelensky sacked Ukraine’s top general, who was also very popular among military ranks – Valery Zaluzhny – in what marked the biggest shakeup of the country’s military leadership since the start of the full-scale Russian invasion.  Zaluzhny was shipped off to be ambassador to the United Kingdom, and some say he might be groomed by the West to eventually replace Zelensky.

The NY Times has recently observed this proved a disaster, as “Ukraine was successful the first year of the war because its army fought differently. Once Zelensky replaced Zaluzhny with Syrsky last year, it has turned into a war of a small Soviet army against a big Soviet army, with predictable consequences.” Leadership became “mired in Soviet-decision making” and forces were no longer nimble or effective, and needless losses mounted.

But Politico, now in documenting more of the ‘dark side of Zelensky’ highlights the case of another popular Ukrainian figure under fire by the Zelensky government:

As Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago, Volodymyr Kudrytskyi, then head of Ukraine’s state-owned national power company Ukrenergo, was scrambling to keep the lights on.

Somehow, he succeeded and continued to do so every year, earning the respect of energy executives worldwide by ensuring the country was able to withstand Russian missile and drone strikes on its power grid and avoid catastrophic blackouts — until he was abruptly forced to resign in 2024, that is.

Kudrytskyi’s dismissal was decried by many in the energy industry and also prompted alarm in Brussels. At the time, Kudrytskyi told POLITICO he was the victim of the relentless centralization of authority that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his powerful head of office Andriy Yermak often pursue. He said he feared “corrupt individuals” would end up taking over the state-owned company.

According to his supporters, it is that kind of talk — and his refusal to remain silent — that explains why Kudrytskyi ended up in a glass-enclosed cubicle in a downtown Kyiv courtroom last week, where he was arraigned on embezzlement charges.

In the background, Zelensky’s motives have further increasingly come under scrutiny for his refusal to hold elections, declaring that martial law policy will remain in effect so long as the war drags on.

The Dismissed Chairman of the Management Board of the National Power Company Ukrenergo, Volodymyr Kudrytskyi

In the meantime he’s been able to amass unprecedented power for himself, while wielding a bludgeon against his internal enemies in Kiev. Politico continues, using word choice which earlier in the conflict no mainstream media account of the Ukrainian political landscape would dare employ:

Others who have received the same treatment include Zelenskyy’s predecessor in office, Petro Poroshenko, who was sanctioned and arraigned on corruption charges this year — a move that could prevent him from standing in a future election. Sanctions have frequently been threatened or used against opponents, effectively freezing assets and blocking the sanctioned person from conducting any financial transactions, including using credit cards or accessing bank accounts.

Poroshenko has since accused Zelenskyy of creeping “authoritarianism,” and seeking to “remove any competitor from the political landscape.”

While we and a few others have long been documenting such ‘creeping authoritarianism’ – Western press has by and large ignored these loud statements from frustrated Ukrainian officials who have been sidelined. There’s been a media atmosphere which views these narratives with suspicion and as too Russian-sympathetic, even when it is (awkwardly) top Ukrainians themselves saying it.

As for Kudrytskyi, and his case wherein state prosecutors claim he personally enriched himself while overseeing the country’s energy company, Politico cites official after official who insists there’s no evidence – and indeed such has never been presented publicly either: 

Kaleniuk was in the courtroom for Kudrytskyi’s two-hour arraignment, and echoes the former energy boss’s claim that the prosecution is “political.” According to Kaleniuk, the case doesn’t make any legal sense, and she said it all sounded “even stranger” as the prosecutor detailed the charges against Kudrytskyi: “He failed to show that he had materially benefited in any way” from an infrastructure contract that, in the end, wasn’t completed, she explained.

The case in question is related to a contract Kudrytskyi authorized seven years ago as Ukrenergo’s then-deputy director for investments. But the subcontractor didn’t even begin work on the assigned infrastructure improvements, and Ukrenergo was able to claw back an advance payment that was made.

His firing long ago had actually prompted resignations from two independent members of the company’s supervisory board, and the whole saga was met with rare criticism in pro-Kiev media outlets within Ukraine at the time.

Meanwhile, another under-acknowledged reality in Ukraine is that there’s a sizeable silent minority (or even majority, perhaps) of the common populace who wants to see this tragic war end in any way possible, even if that means ceding the Russian-speaking territories in the Donbass and Crimea, something which Zelensky and his hawkish backers in Europe consistently refuse as a possibility. These common voices too have been silenced and sidelined in Zelensky’s Ukraine.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 16:55

Timeline: The Autopen Debate

0
Timeline: The Autopen Debate

Authored by Greg Collard via Racket News,

Illustration by Daniel Medina

The House Oversight Committee’s report, “The Biden Autopen Presidency,” can be broken down into two basic parts:

  1. Biden’s inner circle — or “politburo,” as the report characterizes it — worked like the two guys in Weekend at Bernie’s, constantly propping up the president to hide his declining cognitive condition from the public.

  2. As a result, Biden was often not in charge, thus the need for the administration to use the autopen multiple times.

The report reaches a conclusion that reads like a judicial ruling: Absent evidence that Biden made executive decisions, “the Committee deems those actions taken through use of the autopen as void.” The report continues:

Barring evidence of executive actions taken during the Biden presidency showing that President Biden indeed took a particular executive action, the Committee deems those actions taken through use of the autopen as void. The validity of the executive actions allegedly approved and signed (largely by autopen) by President Biden must be reviewed to determine whether legal action is necessary to ameliorate consequences of any illegitimate pardons granted, or executive actions implemented, throughout the Biden Autopen Presidency. The Committee finds numerous executive actions—particularly clemency actions—taken during the Biden Administration were illegitimate.

Attorney General Pam Bondi responded the morning the report was released, saying her team was reviewing Biden’s use of the autopen for pardons.

The Oversight Committee’s report focuses on “executive actions,” particularly Biden’s last-minute pre-emptive pardons of family members and characters such as Anthony Fauci.

A federal appeals court said in a 2024 ruling that a pardon or commutation doesn’t require a president’s signature as long as it can be demonstrated that the president made the decision. The Oversight Committee’s report tries to make the case that proof of Biden’s executive actions is missing.

The Biden White House’s executive decision-making procedures were so lax that the chain of custody for a given decision is difficult or impossible to establish. Documents that were used to predicate executive actions should be sufficiently traceable to ensure they reflect the will of the president. Instead, the Biden White House’s flimsy procedure appears to have been extremely vulnerable to abuse.

Interestingly, the committee’s report does not address legislation that was signed by autopen, even though the U.S. Constitution says presidents “shall” sign bills they approve. Still, courts have not ruled whether it’s legal to sign legislation with an autopen. In 2011, President Obama became the first president to “sign” legislation by autopen. The administration relied on a 2005 Justice Department opinion for its legal justification.

You can read more about that opinion below as part of Racket News’ timeline of events, controversies and key documents concerning the autopen.

March 27, 1929

Acting Solicitor General Alfred Wheat writes a memorandum that says presidential pardons do not require an “autograph,” but that “custom and propriety require that the pardoned man be given some token to show that he has been pardoned.”

July 7, 2005

The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issue an opinion that concludes:

The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.”

Although the Justice Department researched the topic at the request of the White House, President Bush never signed legislation with the autopen.

May 26, 2011

President Obama becomes the first president to sign legislation with the autopen. The president was in Deauville, France, for the G8 Summit while Congress voted to extend provisions in the Patriot Act. They would have expired without his immediate signature.

May 27, 2011

Georgia Congressman Tom Graves expresses concerns about the autopen in a letter to Obama. Graves notes the U.S. Constitution says the president “shall” sign legislation he approves, and seeks clarity that Obama was fully informed of what he had the autopen sign.

Mr. President, I write to request your confirmation that S. 990, as passed by Congress, was presented to you prior to the autopen signing, as well as a detailed, written explanation of your Constitutional authority to assign a surrogate the responsibility of signing bills passed by Congress into law.

Graves follows up in a June 17, 2011 letter to Obama that asks him to re-sign the legislation with his real signature. This time, 20 Republican colleagues also sign the letter.

January 2, 2013

The Obama administration for the second time uses an autopen to sign legislation while the president is on vacation in Hawaii. The autopen was used to sign high-profile “fiscal cliff” legislation to avoid spending cuts that would have taken effect if tax breaks were not extended.

February 13, 2024

The Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals references the 1929 Wheat memo in a ruling that says pardons don’t require a president’s signature as long as it’s clear the president made the clemency decision.

“…nothing in the Constitution restricts the President’s exercise of the clemency power to commutations that have been rendered through a documented writing…But such a clemency warrant or, indeed, any writing, is not required for the President to exercise this authority under the Constitution. Hypothetically, the President could proclaim at a press conference in the Rose Garden that he has pardoned a particular individual, and that would be a valid act…even absent a writing.”

March 14-17, 2025

President Trump posts on Truth Social that whomever controlled the autopen was the real president during the Biden Administration. He also declares the Biden’s pardons are “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT” because they were signed by an autopen.

March 17, 2025

The conservative Heritage Foundation’s “Oversight Project” determines that 32 of Biden’s 51 clemency warrants (affecting 4,245 people) were signed by two different autopen signatures. This finding was cited in the House Oversight Committee’s report.

The Oversight Project also argues the 2005 legal opinion on the autopen was wrong, and “the Biden Administration’s apparent rampant use of the autopen reveals the very reason that OLC’s 2005 Opinion is erroneous at its core. Once the requirement for a wet signature is dispensed with, an important safeguard against fraud is removed, and an historical lawless Administration combined with a cognitively impaired President leads to the exact situation we are in—no one can be sure what actions President Biden actually authorized.”

June 4, 2025

Trump writes a memo that directs his White House counsel to work with the Attorney General to investigate Biden’s use of the autopen. From the memo:

Given clear indications that President Biden lacked the capacity to exercise his Presidential authority, if his advisors secretly used the mechanical signature pen to conceal this incapacity, while taking radical executive actions all in his name, that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of the power of the Presidency, a circumstance that would have implications for the legality and validity of numerous executive actions undertaken in Biden’s name.

A formal report in response to this directive has not been released.

July 13, 2025

Biden defends his administration’s use of the autopen, telling the New York Times that “I made every decision” in regard to the pardons and commutations he made at the end of his term. The Times also posted excerpts of its 10-minute phone interview with him.

September 24, 2025

A new display of presidential portraits debuts outside the West Wing, but in place of Biden’s face is a framed picture of an autopen signing Biden’s name.

October 28, 2025

Republicans on the House Oversight Committee release a 91-page report that alleges Biden’s “loyal senior staff” engaged in a cover-up of his declining health and “numerous instances in which the president’s approval for an executive action or the chief of staff’s approval of signature by autopen was not memorialized.”

The report includes testimony of a Biden administration official, Anthony Bernal, who served as an assistant to the president and as chief of staff to first lady Jill Biden.

In the video above, Bernal is asked if “any unelected official or family member of President Joe Biden execute[d] the duties of the Presidency?”

Bernal answers by exercising his Fifth Amendment rights.

Meanwhile Democrats on the Oversight Committee release a 14-page rebuttal. That report gives examples of Biden Administration officials testifying that Biden “managed complex policy discussions.”

Moreover, the autopen “scandal” manufactured by Chairman Comer and House Republicans proved to be nothing more than a feeble attempt to attack the legitimacy of President Biden’s policies—a pretext to invalidate executive actions by President Biden, including valid pardons issued pursuant to his constitutional authority. After extensive witness interviews and numerous media appearances, the Majority has produced no credible evidence to substantiate his assertions, demonstrating once again his preference for partisanship over genuine oversight.

Racket News is a reader-supported publication. Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 16:20

White House Unveils Details Of U.S.-China Deal, Including Resolution To Nexperia Auto Chip Crisis

0
White House Unveils Details Of U.S.-China Deal, Including Resolution To Nexperia Auto Chip Crisis

The White House on Saturday unveiled a comprehensive breakdown of the U.S.-China trade and economic deal reached by President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping while on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit last week. 

The deal restores stability to global markets, strengthens U.S. industry, and marks a geopolitical win for Washington, according to the White House. 

Here are the key commitments:

  • Fentanyl Crackdown: Halt exports of chemical precursors used to make fentanyl and tighten global export controls on designated substances.

  • Critical Minerals: Suspend and effectively eliminate new and existing export controls on rare earths, gallium, germanium, antimony, and graphite, allowing unrestricted global supply to U.S. industries.

  • Trade Retaliation Rollback: Remove all tariffs and non-tariff countermeasures imposed since March 2025, including those targeting U.S. agriculture and technology firms.

  • Agricultural Purchases: Commit to buy 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans by year-end, and 25 MMT annually through 2028, alongside renewed imports of sorghum and hardwood logs.

  • Semiconductor Resolution: Ensure Nexperia’s China facilities can resume exporting legacy automotive chips, easing global supply chain strain.

  • Industrial Policy Reversal: Terminate investigations targeting U.S. semiconductor and logistics firms and lift sanctions on maritime and shipping entities.

  • Tariff Exemptions Extended: Keep U.S. import exclusions active through 2026, signaling policy de-escalation.

Focusing on the semiconductor resolution commitment, the standoff between the EU, U.S., and China over Netherlands-based Nexperia appears to have resolved, one that could’ve thrown the global auto supply chain into total dysfunction. 

Recall that in October, the Dutch government seized control of Nexperia, owned by China’s Wingtech Technology, over national security concerns. Beijing retaliated by blocking Nexperia’s exports from China, disrupting European and some Asian auto supply chains. 

Disruptions:

For now, trade tensions between the U.S. and China have subsided. In fact, the recent tit-for-tat measures were about each side gaining leverage before Trump and Xi sat down at the negotiating table last week. This resolution on multiple fronts, including the Nexperia chip dispute, is a big sigh of relief.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 11/02/2025 – 15:45