69.3 F
Chicago
Friday, October 9, 2026
Home Blog Page 1062

Anthropic’s Anti-Nuke AI Filter Sparks Debate Over Real Risks

0
Anthropic’s Anti-Nuke AI Filter Sparks Debate Over Real Risks

Now, for some news on the lighter side…like ‘how to prevent machines from enabling nuclear armageddon”..

In August, Anthropic announced that its chatbot Claude would not — and could not — help anyone build a nuclear weapon. The company said it worked with the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to ensure Claude couldn’t leak nuclear secrets, according to a new writeup from Wired.

Anthropic deployed Claude “in a Top Secret environment so that the NNSA could systematically test whether AI models could create or exacerbate nuclear risks,” says Marina Favaro, Anthropic’s head of National Security Policy & Partnerships. Using Amazon’s Top Secret cloud, the agencies “red-teamed” Claude and developed “a sophisticated filter for AI conversations.”

This “nuclear classifier” flags when chats drift toward dangerous territory using an NNSA list of “risk indicators, specific topics, and technical details.” Favaro says it “catches concerning conversations without flagging legitimate discussions about nuclear energy or medical isotopes.”

Wired writes that NNSA official Wendin Smith says AI “has profoundly shifted the national security space” and that the agency’s expertise “places us in a unique position to aid in the deployment of tools that guard against potential risk.”

But experts disagree on whether the risk even exists. “I don’t dismiss these concerns, I think they are worth taking seriously,” says Oliver Stephenson of the Federation of American Scientists. “I don’t think the models in their current iteration are incredibly worrying … but we don’t know where they’ll be in five years.”

He warns that secrecy makes it hard to judge the system’s impact. “When Anthropic puts out stuff like this, I’d like to see them talking in a little more detail about the risk model they’re really worried about,” he says.

Others are more skeptical. “If the NNSA probed a model which was not trained on sensitive nuclear material, then their results are not an indication that their probing prompts were comprehensive,” says Heidy Khlaaf, chief AI scientist at the AI Now Institute. She calls the project “quite insufficient” and says it “relies on an unsubstantiated assumption that Anthropic’s models will produce emergent nuclear capabilities … not aligned with the available science.”

Anthropic disagrees. “A lot of our safety work is focused on proactively building safety systems that can identify future risks and mitigate against them,” a spokesperson says. “This classifier is an example of that.”

Khlaaf also questions giving private firms access to government data. “Do we want these private corporations that are largely unregulated to have access to that incredibly sensitive national security data?” she asks.

Anthropic says its goal isn’t to enable nuclear work but to prevent it. “In our ideal world, this becomes a voluntary industry standard,” Favaro says. “A shared safety practice that everyone adopts.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 23:00

ICE Tracker Planned By Democrats Could Endanger Agents, Bondi Says

0
ICE Tracker Planned By Democrats Could Endanger Agents, Bondi Says

Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times,

Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Oct. 22 that a plan by Democrats to launch an online platform tracking Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles could endanger federal agents and expose them to harassment or violence.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif) said during an Oct. 21 press conference alongside Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass that Democrats on the House Oversight Committee will launch what Garcia called a “master ICE tracker.” The online database would allow the public to submit and review reports of ICE activity across the Los Angeles area, including videos and other data.

“Over the course of the next couple of weeks, the Oversight Committee will be launching on their website a master ICE tracker where we’re going to be essentially tracking every single instance that we can verify that the community will send,” Garcia said.

“You’ll be able to send us information on. It’ll be all available in one central place, and you’ll be able to look up that information as it relates to Los Angeles as well.”

Garcia described the initiative as part of a wide congressional investigation into alleged wrongful detentions by ICE under the Trump administration. Garcia also said he plans to hold a congressional field hearing in Los Angeles, where residents can testify about immigration enforcement concerns, calling it part of a broader inquiry into alleged civil rights violations by federal agents.

He has joined forces with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who is leading a parallel investigation through the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The two lawmakers recently sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanding records on what they described as the unlawful detention of U.S. citizens and immigrants by ICE agents.

The ICE tracker project drew swift condemnation from Bondi, who said such tools could compromise law enforcement operations and fuel organized hostility toward immigration officers.

“Shutdown Democrats are already refusing to pay our law enforcement agents. Now, @RepRobertGarcia and @SenBlumenthal are trying to put ICE agents at risk just for doing their jobs,” Bondi said in an Oct. 22 post on X.

“@TheJusticeDept has ZERO tolerance for violence against law enforcement—we will prosecute any person who physically assaults our agents.”

Border czar Tom Homan said recent heated rhetoric, along with efforts to expose the movements and identities of ICE agents, have already correlated with a surge in organized attacks on law enforcement personnel and facilities.

Protestors demonstrate against ICE operations while blocking the Sixth Street Bridge between Boyle Heights and the downtown area of Los Angeles, on July 1, 2025. Mario Tama/Getty Images

“Death threats, attacks up over 1,000 percent,” Homan said in a recent interview on The Alex Marlow Show, attributing the escalation to “hateful rhetoric” by some media figures and politicians who compare ICE to Nazis or the Gestapo.

He said the Department of Justice (DOJ) was already investigating the financing of organized groups that attack ICE agents and facilities in a coordinated way

“They will find out who is funding this, and they will be held accountable,” Homan said, adding that the riots are “absolutely organized.”

The DOJ under the Trump administration previously pressured Apple and Meta to remove apps and social media pages that tracked ICE operations. Apple deleted an app called ICEBlock earlier this month following a DOJ request, citing potential risks to agents’ safety.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) at the Capitol in Washington on April 1, 2025. Travis Gillmore/The Epoch Times

Garcia has defended his proposal, saying that the tracker would expose civil rights violations by immigration officers.

Citing a recent ProPublica report, he said at least 170 U.S. citizens had been wrongly detained by ICE agents.

“Why? Because they look like me, because they are of Latino origin, or because they are suspected to not be a U.S. citizen, or because they are suspected of crimes that they have not committed,” Garcia said on Oct. 21.

After Bondi’s social media warning, Garcia responded in an online post: “Hey @AGPamBondi, ICE detaining over 170 U.S. citizens is not them ‘just doing their jobs.’”

Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin rejected the criticism. She told The Epoch Times in an emailed statement that the department “enforces federal immigration law without fear, favor, or prejudice.”

She said claims that ICE targets U.S. citizens or engages in racial profiling are “disgusting, reckless, and categorically false.”

McLaughlin added that assaults on ICE officers have risen by more than 1,000 percent amid “smears” from “sanctuary politicians,” and warned that anyone who obstructs or assaults law enforcement will face consequences.

She said that since June 6, ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection have arrested more than 7,100 illegal immigrants in the Los Angeles area.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 22:35

Gone In 12 Seconds: Two MIT Brothers Face Trial For Speedy $25 Million Crypto Heist

0
Gone In 12 Seconds: Two MIT Brothers Face Trial For Speedy $25 Million Crypto Heist

Two MIT-trained brothers accused of stealing $25 million in cryptocurrency in just 12 seconds face trial this week in Manhattan federal court. Prosecutors call it a “first-of-its-kind” fraud. The defense says they simply outsmarted “predatory” trading bots in a lawless environment, according to Business Insider.

Anton Peraire-Bueno, 25, and James Peraire-Bueno, 29, are charged with conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering — each count carrying up to 20 years in prison.

Prosecutors say the brothers spent months planning an April 2023 Ethereum blockchain theft, researching “how to wash crypto,” “top crypto lawyers,” and even “money launder statue of limitations.” They allegedly used “bait transactions” to study three traders’ bots, then “lured” them into a trap with irresistible crypto trades. Once the bots took the bait, the brothers exploited a software “vulnerability” to view private data and “tamper” with transactions, prosecutors say.

BI writes that instead of profits, the victims’ $25 million bought worthless “junk crypto.” The theft took place in just 12 seconds — before the trades were permanently logged on the blockchain.

“Using the specialized skills developed during their education, as well as their expertise in cryptocurrency trading,” the brothers “exploited the very integrity of the Ethereum blockchain,” prosecutors wrote in their indictment. They say the pair hid their identities and funds through shell companies and foreign exchanges.

The defense calls the case an overreach. “There’s no central authority” on the Ethereum blockchain, attorney Patrick Looby argued in June. “And there’s no government regulations. Instead, economic incentives guide parties’ behavior.”

For fraud, “there needs to be a promise to the victim,” Looby said. “Here, there is no alleged communication at all between the Peraire-Buenos and the traders. And for that reason as well, there’s no alleged intent to defraud.”

The traders, he added, “made very risky bets on a strategy that didn’t pay out. But there was nothing stolen and there was no theft, as that word would normally be used.”

Earlier filings argue the victims lost funds “through pre-programmed trades without ever interacting with the Peraire-Buenos.” The defense wrote, “Before this indictment, no Ethereum user would have understood that thwarting a predatory attempt by ‘bots’ engaged in market manipulation could lead to criminal charges.”

“No court has ever applied these statutes to similar transactions,” they added. “And the Peraire-Buenos had no reason to know that their alleged conduct may be considered unlawful.”

The trial begins Tuesday and may run into early November.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 22:10

Highway Horror: Illegal Alien Truck Driver Kills Three In DUI Crash On California Highway

0
Highway Horror: Illegal Alien Truck Driver Kills Three In DUI Crash On California Highway

Submitted by American Truckers United,

Three months ago, American Truckers United sounded the alarm: America’s highways are a war zone, thanks to an epidemic of illegal alien truck drivers barreling into stalled traffic at full throttle. 

Now, in a chilling echo, another semi-truck has plowed into a standstill at highway speeds, leaving a trail of twisted metal and shattered lives. This is the deadly harvest of “Strong Solo Sergey,” the sleazy tactic mega-carriers and brokerage giants cheer as their preferred business model.

Via Fox News reporter Bill Melugin: 

Per multiple ICE sources, Jashanpreet Singh, the semi-truck driver suspected of killing three people in a DUI crash on the 10 freeway in Ontario, CA yesterday, is an Indian illegal alien who was caught & released at the CA border by the Biden admin in March 2022. DHS photo of him attached via federal sources. I’m told ICE is placing a detainer request on Singh with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, where he is in custody on suspicion of DUI causing great bodily injury and gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. He has not been formally charged yet. Police say Singh was speeding and under the influence, never hitting his breaks, when he crashed into slow moving traffic on the freeway, causing a devastating and deadly chain reaction crash that killed 3 people. The victims have not been identified yet.

For the uninitiated, “Strong Solo Sergey” is corporate code for exploiting dirt-cheap foreign drivers – your “Sergeys” from abroad – while flouting hours-of-service rules like they’re suggestions. These rookies, often non-citizens with fresh non-domicile CDLs, log 20-hour marathons behind the wheel, eyes glazing over from exhaustion. It’s a calculated gut-punch to honest American trucking outfits, undercutting us with rock-bottom rates and zero regard for safety. And the wreckage? It’s piling up. Just ask the family of Tiana Moore, a devoted single mom whose world ended in a fireball when one of these sleep-deprived phantoms misjudged a maneuver after 20+ hours on the clock. Tiana’s crash was no anomaly – it’s the grim routine for these invaders, turning our interstates into roulette wheels.

These aren’t the “Knights of the Road” we idolized in our youth – grizzled pros who knew every mile like their own heartbeat. No, the ATA’s fat-cat enablers are hell-bent on phasing them out, flooding the lanes with bargain-bin hazards to pad their profits. Unacceptable? It’s a national disgrace.

Worse, our so-called leaders are fiddling while Rome burns. Take HB 5688, peddled by North Carolina’s David Rouzer as a “fix.” It’s theater – a flimsy facade that slams the front door while propping the back wide open. The next administration could easily just install another Alejandro Mayorkas clone as Transportation Secretary and unleash the floodgates anew, dooming more families to Tiana’s fate.

Enough. American Truckers United calls for a total ban on issuing non-domicile CDLs to non-citizens. No loopholes, no half-measures. Secure our roads, protect our knights, and put America first – before the next Sergey turns your commute into a coffin.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 21:45

Blood Thinners & Anti-Obesity Shots Dominate Medicare Drug Spending

0
Blood Thinners & Anti-Obesity Shots Dominate Medicare Drug Spending

From diabetes injectables to blockbuster blood thinners, a handful of drugs account for a sizable share of Medicare’s pharmacy bill.

This visualization, via Visual Capitalist’s Pallavi Rao, ranks the most common drugs by total Medicare spending in 2023, sourced from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

It tracks every claim, dosage, and dollar flowing through Medicare Part D, the federal prescription-drug benefit.

Blood Thinners Are America’s Most Common Drug

Eliquis (generic name: Apixaban) alone racked up $18.3 billion in Medicare spending in 2023, nearly double the next drug, Ozempic.

Alongside Xarelto, anticoagulants accounted for over $24 billion in 2023.

Rank Country Region Years in Poor Health HALE, 2021 Average Life Expectancy, 2025
1 🇧🇭 Bahrain Asia 17.4 64.2 81.6
2 🇴🇲 Oman Asia 17.3 63.2 80.5
3 🇸🇿 Eswatini Africa 16.9 47.5 64.4
4 🇶🇦 Qatar Asia 16.5 66.2 82.7
5 🇧🇼 Botswana Africa 16.3 53.1 69.4
6 🇦🇫 Afghanistan Asia 16.1 50.4 66.5
7 🇦🇪 UAE Asia 15.9 67.3 83.2
8 🇺🇸 U.S. Northern America 15.7 63.9 79.6
9 🇵🇪 Peru Southern America 15.1 63.0 78.1
10 🇱🇧 Lebanon Asia 14.9 63.2 78.1
11 🇳🇦 Namibia Africa 14.9 52.8 67.7
12 🇲🇻 Maldives Asia 14.8 66.7 81.5
13 🇧🇷 Brazil Southern America 14.4 61.8 76.2
14 🇮🇳 India Asia 14.4 58.1 72.5
15 🇲🇿 Mozambique Africa 14.3 49.7 64.0
16 🇮🇷 Iran Asia 14.1 64.0 78.1
17 🇲🇰 North Macedonia Europe 14.0 63.7 77.7
18 🇲🇽 Mexico Americas 14.0 61.4 75.4
19 🇫🇲 Micronesia Oceania 13.9 57.9 71.8
20 🇨🇱 Chile Southern America 13.8 67.7 81.5
21 🇨🇺 Cuba Americas 13.8 64.6 78.4
22 🇪🇷 Eritrea Africa 13.8 55.4 69.2
23 🇸🇰 Slovakia Europe 13.8 64.9 78.7
24 🇿🇦 South Africa Africa 13.7 52.8 66.5
25 🇿🇲 Zambia Africa 13.7 53.0 66.7
26 🇬🇷 Greece Europe 13.6 68.6 82.2
27 🇬🇹 Guatemala Americas 13.6 59.3 72.9
28 🇧🇬 Bulgaria Europe 13.6 62.4 76.0
29 🇸🇷 Suriname Southern America 13.6 60.3 73.9
30 🇦🇺 Australia Oceania 13.6 70.6 84.2
31 🇬🇾 Guyana Southern America 13.6 56.8 70.4
32 🇱🇸 Lesotho Africa 13.6 44.6 58.2
33 🇨🇷 Costa Rica Americas 13.6 67.6 81.2
34 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia Asia 13.6 65.6 79.2
35 🇫🇷 France Europe 13.5 70.1 83.6
36 🇺🇾 Uruguay Southern America 13.5 65.0 78.5
37 🇵🇱 Poland Europe 13.5 65.5 79.0
38 🇪🇨 Ecuador Southern America 13.5 64.3 77.8
39 🇨🇿 Czechia Europe 13.4 66.7 80.1
40 🇮🇹 Italy Europe 13.4 70.6 84.0
41 🇸🇧 Solomon Islands Oceania 13.4 57.4 70.8
42 🇧🇸 Bahamas Americas 13.4 61.5 74.9
43 🇲🇦 Morocco Africa 13.4 62.3 75.7
44 🇺🇦 Ukraine Europe 13.3 61.6 74.9
45 🇹🇳 Tunisia Africa 13.3 63.6 76.9
46 🇦🇱 Albania Europe 13.3 66.7 80.0
47 🇵🇷 Puerto Rico Americas 13.3 68.8 82.1
48 🇵🇦 Panama Americas 13.3 66.7 80.0
49 🇷🇸 Serbia Europe 13.2 63.9 77.1
50 🇵🇾 Paraguay Southern America 13.2 60.9 74.1
51 🇧🇦 Bosnia and Herzegovina Europe 13.2 65.0 78.2
52 🇵🇹 Portugal Europe 13.2 69.5 82.7
53 🇭🇳 Honduras Americas 13.2 60.0 73.2
54 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan Asia 13.1 61.6 74.7
55 🇾🇪 Yemen Asia 13.1 56.5 69.6
56 🇻🇺 Vanuatu Oceania 13.1 58.7 71.8
57 🇨🇦 Canada Northern America 13.1 69.8 82.9
58 🇨🇴 Colombia Southern America 13.1 65.0 78.1
59 🇲🇾 Malaysia Asia 13.1 63.9 77.0
60 🇨🇭 Switzerland Europe 13.1 71.1 84.2
61 🇰🇮 Kiribati Oceania 13.1 53.6 66.7
62 🇯🇴 Jordan Asia 13.0 65.1 78.1
63 🇲🇼 Malawi Africa 13.0 54.7 67.7
64 🇰🇼 Kuwait Asia 13.0 67.8 80.8
65 🇬🇧 UK Europe 13.0 68.6 81.6

Their rise reflects both an aging population and expanding preventative treatment for stroke and atrial fibrillation.

With almost four million beneficiaries, Eliquis is prescribed to roughly one in 10 Part D enrollees.

ℹ️ Related: See the 25 countries that are projected have the most seniors in 2050.

Diabetes and Weight-Loss Therapies Surge in America

Four GLP-1 and SGLT2 diabetes drugs—Ozempic, Jardiance, Trulicity, and Farxiga—collectively totaled $29.7 billion.

Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic and Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro also double as weight-loss aids, driving demand beyond traditional type-2 diabetes patients.

This table lists cost per dose for the 10 most expensive drugs.

Their high list prices—Ozempic averages $356 per dose—illustrate how novel biologics multiply spending even with smaller patient counts.

ℹ️ Related: See where Americans skipped going to the doctor (even when they had to) in 2023.

Cancer and Autoimmune Biologics are Expensive Drugs

Revlimid, Humira, and Stelara each exceed $3 billion despite treating fewer than 100,000 beneficiaries each.

Revlimid’s $878 per dose and Stelara’s staggering $26,818 underscore why biologics dominate specialty-drug budgets.

Want more health-related data storytelling? Check out Ranked: Countries That Spend the Most Years in Poor Health on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 21:20

America’s Sixth Default Is Coming – What It Means For Gold And Your Wealth

0
America’s Sixth Default Is Coming – What It Means For Gold And Your Wealth

Authored by Nick Giambruno via InternationalMan.com,

Every time the US government has faced an existential financial crisis in its history, it has chosen to change the rules rather than honor its promises in full… usually by replacing gold or silver with paper.

From the War of 1812 when interest payments were missed, to the Lincoln’s Greenbacks, to Roosevelt voiding gold clauses in 1933, the end of silver redemption in 1968, and Nixon closing the gold window in 1971, Washington has defaulted five times before—often by shifting the terms of payment rather than admitting outright failure.

There’s no doubt these episodes were defaults. To claim otherwise would be like trying to unilaterally change the terms of your dollar-denominated mortgage or credit card bill so that you could pay your liabilities with Argentine pesos or Zimbabwe dollars—and then pretending that somehow it wasn’t a default.

The US government is essentially telling its creditors the same thing Darth Vader once said: “I am altering the deal. Pray I don’t alter it any further.”

Just like in Star Wars, the message is clear—Washington will change the rules whenever it needs to. Creditors may get paid, but not in the way they were promised, and certainly not in the way they expected.

Today, the US government is once again in an existential financial bind. The national debt is unmanageable, federal spending is locked on an upward path, and interest on that debt has already surged past $1 trillion a year. At this pace, interest could soon overtake Social Security as the single largest item in the federal budget.

The largest expenditures are entitlements like Social Security and Medicare. No politician will cut them—in fact, they’ll keep growing. Tens of millions of Baby Boomers, nearly a quarter of the population, are moving into retirement. Cutting benefits is political suicide.

Defense spending, already massive, is also off-limits. With the most precarious geopolitical environment since World War 2, military spending isn’t going down—it’s going up.

Welfare programs are similarly untouchable.

The only way to meaningfully reduce spending would be to slash entitlements, dismantle the welfare state, shut down hundreds of foreign military bases, and repay a large portion of the national debt to lower the interest cost. That would require a leader willing to restore a limited Constitutional Republic.

However, that’s a completely unrealistic fantasy. It would be foolish to bet on that happening.

Here’s the bottom line: Washington cannot even slow the spending growth rate, let alone cut it.

Expenditures have nowhere to go but up—way up.

Tax revenue won’t save the day either.

Even if tax rates went to 100%, it would not be enough to stop the debt from growing.

According to Forbes, there are around 806 billionaires in the US with a combined net worth of about $5.8 trillion.

Even if Washington confiscated 100% of billionaire wealth, it would barely fund a single year of spending—and it wouldn’t do a thing to stop the unstoppable trajectory of debt and deficits.

That means interest expense will keep exploding. It has already surpassed the defense budget and is on track to exceed Social Security soon. At that point, interest could consume most federal tax revenue.

The old accounting tricks and fiat games won’t hide the reality for much longer.

In short, the skyrocketing interest bill is now an urgent threat to the US government’s solvency. I have no doubt Washington will soon find itself unable to meet its obligations once again.

So the question now is: what will the sixth default look like?

I don’t think the sixth default will be a dramatic, one-day event like in 1933 or 1971. It will be a slow-motion process: steady debasement of the dollar to cover a debt burden that cannot be serviced honestly. And just like in the past, Washington and its lackeys in the media will never admit it’s a default.

Unlike the past, the US no longer has obligations tied to gold or silver. Everything is denominated in fiat currency that the Federal Reserve can create without limit.

The mechanics are different, but the outcome will be the same: creditors will get stiffed with money worth far less than what was promised.

After the 1971 default, which cut the dollar’s last tie to gold, the unspoken promise was that Washington would be a responsible steward of its fiat currency.

At the core of that promise was the illusion that the Federal Reserve would act independently of political pressures. The idea was simple: without at least the appearance of independence, investors would see the Fed for what it is—a funding arm for spendthrift politicians—and confidence in the dollar would collapse.

That illusion is now shattering.

The government must issue ever-growing amounts of debt while keeping rates low to contain exploding interest costs.

That’s where the Federal Reserve comes in.

Backed into a corner, Washington will force the Fed to slash rates, buy Treasuries, and launch wave after wave of monetary easing. These measures will debase the dollar while destroying the illusion of Fed independence.

That’s why I believe the collapse of the Fed’s credibility as an independent institution will define the sixth default.

One of the clearest signs is Trump’s push to consolidate power over the Fed.

Let’s be clear: central banks were never “independent.” They exist to siphon wealth from the public through inflation and funnel it to the politically connected. The Fed’s independence was always a mirage—and now it’s disappearing fast.

Trump is simply doing what any leader in his position would do. No one believes China’s central bank is independent of Xi. If any nation faced a similar crisis, its central bank would fall in line with government demands.

I expect Trump will get his way with the Fed. The Fed will bend to his demands, debasing the dollar to keep the debt burden from spiraling out of control. He will either force Powell to get in line or replace him outright, stacking the Fed with loyalists. The result will be money printing on a scale we’ve never seen before.

Trump’s efforts are already starting to work. At Jackson Hole, Powell admitted that “the shifting balance of risks may warrant adjusting our policy stance,” signaling that rate cuts could come soon.

And that’s exactly what happened. On September 17, the Fed cut rates by 25bps and indicated more to come.

Further, Stephen Miran, Trump’s most recent successful nominee to the Federal Reserve Board, has been pushing the idea of what he calls the Fed’s “third mandate.”

Traditionally, the Fed has two mandates: price stability and maximum employment. Miran’s proposed third mandate would be for the Fed to “moderate long-term interest rates.”

What that really means is that the Fed would openly finance the federal government by creating new dollars to buy long-term debt, keeping yields artificially low. In other words, the so-called third mandate is an explicit admission that the Fed is no longer independent. It would become a political tool used to fund government spending.

Without this support, massive federal spending would flood the market with Treasuries, pushing interest rates much higher. But with the Fed stepping in, Washington can keep borrowing while holding rates down—at least for a while. The catch is that this comes at the cost of debasing the dollar. Eventually, that debasement will force investors to demand higher yields anyway, which only worsens the problem.

I believe it’s only a matter of time before the Fed fully capitulates, shattering the illusion of independence once and for all.

Mike Wilson, CIO at Morgan Stanley, recently made it explicit:

“The Fed does have an obligation to help the government fund itself.”

“I’d be nervous if the Fed was totally independent. The Fed needs to help us get out of this deficit problem.”

This is the essence of the sixth default.

It won’t come through missed payments or rewritten contracts. It will come through the collapse of the myth that the Fed is independent. Once monetary policy is fully political, the fallout will be enormous—for the dollar, for Treasuries, and for gold.

And it’s not happening in isolation. As Washington sinks deeper into debt, the rest of the world sees exactly what’s coming. Central banks are moving to protect themselves. I believe they know debasement is inevitable, and they don’t intend to be left holding the bag. Their response has been clear: abandon paper promises and move back toward gold.

In short, the sixth default won’t be a headline—it will be a bleed-out.

When the dollar is quietly debased and the Fed’s “independence” finally cracks, it will be too late to reposition.

If you’ve read this far, you already sense the window is closing. Do not wait for confirmation from the evening news.

The question now is not if but how this crisis will unfold, and whether you’ll be on the losing end of it.

That’s why I’ve prepared a special report, The Most Dangerous Economic Crisis in 100 Years… and the Top 3 Strategies You Need Right Now.

Inside, you’ll learn what risks are ahead, what they mean for your wealth and personal freedom, and the practical steps you can take today to protect yourself. Click here to get your free PDF copy.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 20:55

How Progressives Broke The Constitution And Praised Themselves For It

0
How Progressives Broke The Constitution And Praised Themselves For It

Authored by Wanjiru Njoya via The Mises Institute,

In his article “Is the Constitution Broken beyond Repair?” David Gordon draws attention to a phenomenon that is often overlooked, namely, the great rejoicing among some constitutional lawyers over the fact that “to establish the new Constitution, Lincoln overthrew the first one… he replaced the old, immoral Constitution with a new one based on equality.” This is indeed one reason why some of Lincoln’s admirers still celebrate the burning of the South by the Union Army—the devastation and destruction of the South symbolizes for them the brave new world of equality and social justice forged by a righteous army through fire and steel.

Most people, if they understood what was really being celebrated here, would be bewildered. Although Abraham Lincoln and the Union Generals Ulysses Grant and William Sherman are generally admired for saving the Union by those who do not consider the consent of states to be necessary, they may not necessarily think the war was commendable in itself or worthy of celebration; they merely consider that war was necessary for Lincoln to advance his righteous cause. They would view the claim that Lincoln rejected the constraints set by the Constitution as some sort of critique, at the very least—while we can and do debate matters of constitutional interpretation, surely we all accept the premise that a president should not actually overthrow the Constitution? Shouldn’t any president at least try to pretend to uphold the Constitution, even as he brazenly drives a coach and horses through it? Even if he is an unashamed hypocrite who believes double standards always apply to his conduct, he should at least make a show of believing that he sees his actions as constitutional, and should by no means concede to complaints that he is subverting the law.

But, rather surprisingly, some Lincolnite constitutionalists do not see matters that way. They believe that deliberately subverting the Constitution is actually very good if it is done with good intentions—namely, intentions of which progressives approve. As they see it, the new Constitution created by Lincoln’s war is more egalitarian and just than the old one written by slave owners. They believe the overthrow of the old Constitution ought to be welcomed by everyone who upholds “the idea of America”—the “idea” being, of course, progressivism. Nor is this desire to destroy the Constitution new. In the 19th century, the abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison described the Constitution as an “agreement with hell”:

Garrison then produced a copy of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law and put a match to it. Amid cries of “Amen” the hated document burned to a cinder… As Martin Luther had burned copies of canon law and the papal bull excommunicating him from the Catholic Church for heresy, Garrison consigned each to the flames. Holding up a copy of the U.S. Constitution, he branded it as “the source and parent of all the other atrocities–‘a covenant with death, and an agreement with hell.’” As the nation’s founding document burned to ashes, he cried out: “So perish all compromises with tyranny!”

The abolition of slavery in 1865 only fanned the flames of this revolutionary fever. The new rallying cry was that steps must be taken to ensure that slavery “by a different name” would never return, and Reconstruction amendments were accordingly forced through. Tennessee, which was the only state in the South to “willingly” ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, only did so after threats of force.

In Tennessee, opponents of the Amendment absented themselves from the House in order to prevent a quorum. This did not stop the supporters of the Amendment, who forcibly seized two absent members and held them in a committee room. The House ignored a court order to release the two and overruled the Speaker, who ruled there was no quorum present.

To many people this might seem, at the very least, mildly embarrassing but nevertheless understandable in the tumultuous aftermath of war. There is a process for amending the Constitution, and the use of force is not part of that process, so at the very least these irregularities ought to be condemned. But for progressives, overthrowing the old Constitution by any means necessary is praiseworthy, because the Fourteenth Amendment brought equality and justice! Let justice be done by any means necessary! In his foreword to Raoul Berger’s Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Forrest McDonald observes that activist courts enthusiastically endorsed the Reconstruction amendments without any qualms. He explains that “advocates of judicial activism began to assert that neither the words of the Constitution nor the intentions of the framers are any longer relevant.” After all, the framers were “racist” so nobody should care what their original intentions were.

After 1865, the progressive amendment of the Constitution continued inexorably under the civil rights regime. When Christopher Caldwell wrote his critique of the Civil Rights Act usurping the Constitution, one reviewer summarized Caldwell’s analysis under the title “The Law that Ate the Constitution.” Now, many readers would assume that “the law that ate the Constitution” is a provocative title denoting an unwelcome development, and that the whole point of Caldwell’s analysis would surely have been to warn us that the Constitution was under threat. Even those committed to “the idea” of civil rights, who may never be persuaded that civil rights pose a threat to the constitution—the judges just need to be a bit more careful to avoid subverting the Constitution, right?—might nevertheless appreciate Caldwell’s attempt to warn us of a potential threat to which we may wish to be alert. But, astonishingly, some law professors view it not as a threat but as cause for celebration—if Caldwell is right that the civil rights law is now the de facto Constitution and has displaced the racist de jure Constitution, they would take that not as a warning but as a wonderful outcome that merits celebration.

Progressives favor the centralization of constitutional authority in the federal courts, and therefore, as they see it, if the courts indeed willfully distorted constitutional history to achieve that goal, so be it. After all, judges are distorting the Constitution for a good cause—in the service of equality, fairness, and justice. Raoul Berger, writing about the role of the Fourteenth Amendment as a platform for the “continuing revision of the Constitution under the guise of interpretation,” notes how the progressive Warren Supreme Court was hailed as “keeper of the national conscience.” Therefore, when conservatives like Thomas Sowell warned about “the quiet repeal of the American Revolution,” progressives saw that not as cause for alarm but as evidence that they are winning. As they see it, activist courts are to be commended for deliberately replacing the American Revolution with a racially-enlightened social revolution. Far from denying that they have subverted the Constitution, they are supremely proud of themselves for having done so.

They have convinced themselves that the new de facto Constitution better reflects “American values.”

The point here is not simply that there are different schools of statutory interpretation, by reference to which some constitutionalists uphold a “purposive” or “living tree” approach which tries to give meaning to what they see as the underlying goals and values of the Constitution.

Most progressives who champion purposive interpretation do not claim that the old de jure Constitution should be altogether destroyed and replaced with a de facto new Constitution that is morally superior—most would at least attempt to offer some sort of argument that their inventions are a matter of reinterpretation and redefinition of the words actually written in the original Constitution.

The progressives who praise themselves for displacing the Constitution altogether make a very different argument.

They do not claim to be engaged in creative reinterpretation, but to be abolishing the de jure Constitution altogether in order to replace it with a more worthy compact rooted in their civil rights revolution.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 19:15

Democratic Senate Candidate With Tattoo Resembling Nazi Symbol Trained Socialist Paramilitary Group

0
Democratic Senate Candidate With Tattoo Resembling Nazi Symbol Trained Socialist Paramilitary Group

Transgender violence and left-wing radicalism have been thrust into the news cycle this fall:

Before the political assassination of Charlie Kirk by a suspected furry-loving leftist and demonic transgender that shot up Christians at a church in Minneapolis, we warned about the left’s alarming rise with violence, chaos, and destruction are recurring themes found in their online posts, propaganda, manifestos, and civil disobedience in protests and riots (coined over the summer as “civil terrorism“). By late summer, we warned about “Nihilistic Accelerationism” from the left and the emergence of “transtifa”… Shortly after that, a transgender shooter targeted Christians, followed by the political assassination of Kirk.

Democrats and their billionaire-funded NGO network have fueled activist groups that, over the past decade, have created targeting profiles on President Trump and his MAGA supporters, who represent more than half of the country. Their rhetoric, using terms like “fascist” and “Nazi,” is not random whatsoever. MAGA must wake up to the dark reality that this rhetoric is designed to build targeting profiles for left-wing extremists, hence the assassination of Kirk, who was labeled a “fascist.” This targeting campaign appears to have been orchestrated at the highest levels:

With the targeting campaign still active, consider this: For many young Americans, especially those in woke education factories, called college, that dangerous narrative has been circulating like wildfire for more than half of their lives. As the old saying goes, if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes accepted as truth.

Democrats know exactly what they’re doing.

This leads us to the Socialist Rifle Association, which boasts 10,000 members, according to a report last month, has been “planning for war against fascists.”

Remember Armed Queers? Well, they’re big fans of the billionaire-funded No Kings network.

Elizabeth Warren even embraced the movement. 

Back to SRA, The Maine Wire’s Steve Robinson reports, “Graham Platner, the ex-Marine running against Gov. Janet Mills (D) for the Democratic U.S. Senate nomination, instructed members of the Socialist Rifle Association on paramilitary tactics.”

Robinson says that a recently enacted law in Maine prohibits “unauthorized paramilitary training” and could lead Platner to face a Class D crime.

From the same party that calls Elon Musk and Trump “Nazi”…

Sigh…

All in all, leftist corporate media and deep-state talking heads have downplayed far-left violence. But many Americans received an extreme dose of reality this year: the radical left is armed, already carrying out or attempting political assassinations against MAGA figures, attacking the federal government, and has spent much of the year inciting riots and staging color-revolution-style operations.

The chaos will not stop until President Trump is removed. That’s the whole point of the chaos: it’s a coordinated color revolution operation funded by billionaire globalists that routes endless amounts of funds through the lawless NGO world. That’s why the White House has declared war on the radical left and vowed to “dismantle” these leftist groups that subvert the nation and conspire against it. We suspect a reckoning is nearing for the non-profit world.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 18:50

Government Shutdown Becomes Second-Longest In US History: 4 Things To Know

0
Government Shutdown Becomes Second-Longest In US History: 4 Things To Know

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

The government shutdown that started on Oct. 1 has entered its fourth week and is now the second-longest in U.S. history.

At Day 22 of the shutdown, Democrats and Republicans have remained at odds. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) has been speaking on the Senate floor for more than 17 hours to protest the Trump administration’s policies.

The Senate was scheduled to vote for a 12th time to reopen the government, but Merkley’s speech may derail that vote.

Shutdowns Began in the 1980s

The ongoing shutdown is the second-longest funding lapse in modern history, exceeded by the 35-day shutdown that started in late 2018 and lasted until early 2019. Funding lapse-caused shutdowns are a mostly recent phenomenon, starting in their current format in the early 1980s, according to the House of Representatives’ website.

Before the 1980s, according to the House, “funding gaps did not typically have major effects on government operations. Government agencies would often continue to operate during a lapse in appropriations, with the expectation that funding would be provided in the future.”

That all changed after a series of legal opinions by then-Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti in 1980–1981 suggested that federal agencies had no legal basis to continue operating during funding lapses.

During the 35-day shutdown, Democrats disputed President Donald Trump’s request for billions in federal funding to construct a U.S.–Mexico border wall, a signature issue in Trump’s first presidential campaign. Later, the Senate passed an appropriations bill without any funding for the wall. This came after Democrats took power in the House after the 2018 midterm elections.

A shutdown in 1995 and 1996 lasted 21 days during the administration of President Bill Clinton.

No End in Sight

On Tuesday, Trump said that the GOP won’t “be extorted” by Democratic lawmakers.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called on Trump to meet with Democrats on ending the government shutdown.

“Things get worse every day for the American people,” Schumer said at an Oct. 21 news conference before calling for Trump to meet before the president’s trip to Asia. “He should sit down with us” and “negotiate in a serious way before he goes away.”

The House voted 11 times to pass a stopgap measure. On Oct. 20, the Senate again failed to pass a measure to fund the government through Nov. 21. In that vote, three Democrats joined Republicans, but the GOP needed several more to break through the 60-vote threshold.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) blamed Democrats during a news conference on Wednesday.

“While it’s already been, as we noted yesterday, the longest full government shutdown in history, Oct. 22 marks another landmark. This is now the second-longest government shutdown of any kind ever, in the history of our country,” Johnson said. “And it’s just shameful. Democrats keep making history, but they’re doing it for all the wrong reasons.”

Democrats say that the government reopening bill needs to include an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies that expire at the end of the year. Republicans have said that the Obamacare measure should be considered separately.

“The ACA crisis is looming over everyone’s head, and yet Republicans seem ready to let people’s premiums spike,” Schumer said in a floor speech this past week.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said this past week that he wouldn’t vote to “move forward on appropriations bills until they’re serious about stopping health care premiums from going up.”

Trump: No Meeting Until Government Reopens

On Tuesday, Trump said that he won’t sit down with Democrats until the government is reopened.

“I would like to meet with both of them, but I said one little caveat, I will only meet if they let the country open,” Trump told reporters, referencing a request by Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).

Schumer had said that Jeffries and he “reached out to the president today and urged him to sit down and negotiate with us to resolve the health care crisis, address it, and end the Trump shutdown.”

“We urged him to meet with us, and we said we’ll set up an appointment with him any time, any place before he leaves,” they added.

Earlier, Trump said he believed that some Democrats may ultimately break ranks and vote alongside Republicans to end the shutdown in the near future. A similar sentiment was made by his chief economist, Kevin Hassett, who told CNBC that he believes a government funding bill would be passed this week.

Workers Still Furloughed

Thousands of federal workers have been furloughed as federal agencies pared their activities beginning on Oct. 1, the start of the new fiscal year. Simultaneously, about $1.7 trillion in agency operations funding—about one quarter of annual federal spending—expired.

The nation’s 1.3 million active-duty service members got a reprieve. They were looking at missing a paycheck this past week, but Trump ordered the Pentagon to redirect money. Their next paycheck is due on Oct. 31.

The administration is also trying to dismiss thousands of federal workers in agencies that don’t align with its priorities. Republican leaders in Congress have said that’s part of the fallout from a shutdown.

White House budget chief Russ Vought said in an interview on “The Charlie Kirk Show” that many more are planned.

“I think we’ll probably end up being north of 10,000,” Vought said.

A federal judge in San Francisco this past week ordered the government to pause mass layoffs during the shutdown, saying that the cuts appeared to be politically motivated. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the administration was confident that it would prevail on the merits in subsequent legal action.

A number of states this month have warned that the funding lapse could affect issuance of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments, or food stamps, starting on Nov. 1 if the shutdown persists.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 18:25

Rand Paul Again Slams Trump Over Strikes: ‘If We Don’t Blow Up Boats Off Miami, Why Do It Off Venezuela?’

0
Rand Paul Again Slams Trump Over Strikes: ‘If We Don’t Blow Up Boats Off Miami, Why Do It Off Venezuela?’

Senator Rand Paul has again slammed President Donald Trump over his military operations off Venezuela, which has killed 27 people after at least half a dozen alleged drug smuggling boats have been blown out of the water by US drones.

Paul spoke with British journalist Piers Morgan this week and argued that any armed conflict should be approved by Congress. The Republican and libertarian-leaning Senator further questioned the administration’s claim that the strikes aim to thwart the fentanyl trade in particular.

“There is no fentanyl made in Venezuela. Not just a little bit, there’s none being made. These are outboard boats that, in order for them to get to Miami, would have to stop and refuel 20 times,” Paul said.

“It’s all likely going to Trinidad and Tobago. There are a lot of reasons to be worried about this. Number one is the broader principle of when can you kill people indiscriminately when there’s war. That’s why when we declare war is supposed to be done by Congress. It’s not supposed to be done willy nilly. When there’s war you just kill people in the war zone, there are rules of engagement,” Paul added.

He further emphasized that “interdicting drugs has always been an anti crime activity where we don’t just summarily execute people, we actually present evidence and convict them.”

The Kentucky lawmaker has also recently asserted on social media that “it’s imperative that we make it clear that war powers reside with Congress, not the president.“

Paul has recently joined Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine in seeking to force a vote which would stop Trump from unilaterally declaring war on Venezuela.

The Washington Post meanwhile writes on Wednesday that Trump is beating the drums of war on Venezuela:

Trump has made clear his intentions to go beyond blowing up boats, saying “we’re going to stop them by land” in Venezuela. Several people familiar with internal administration deliberations said any initial land attack would probably be a targeted operation on alleged trafficker encampments or clandestine airstrips, rather than a direct attempt to unseat Maduro.

Some said the U.S. deployments and boat strikes were psychological warfare to promote fractures in the Venezuelan armed forces or persuade Maduro to step down.

But Trump has said nothing to dispel concerns that the United States could launch a full-scale military operation.

Paul argues to Piers Morgan: If we don’t blow up boats off Miami, why do it off Venezuela…

Earlier in the week Trump was directly asked whether he has authorized the CIA to “take out” Maduro. Trump responded ambiguously by saying it would be “a ridiculous question for me to answer. But I think Venezuela is feeling the heat.”

*  *  * Click pic, select knife (our favorite), hear the lamentations of their women

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/22/2025 – 18:00