67.2 F
Chicago
Sunday, September 20, 2026
Home Blog Page 1430

Sweden Urged To Halt International Adoptions After Decades Of Child Trafficking Uncovered

Sweden Urged To Halt International Adoptions After Decades Of Child Trafficking Uncovered

Authored by Owen Evans via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A Swedish government commission has recommended halting all international adoptions after an investigation found that decades of illegal adoptions amounted to child trafficking involving state authorities and adoption agencies.

Children at Wang Jiayu Orphanage in Anhui Province, China, on July 9, 2006. China Photos/Getty Images

At a news conference in Stockholm, Swedish Social Services Minister Camilla Waltersson Gronvall told the Swedish language Epoch Times on June 2: “[There are] appalling cases of deficient background information, and even children simply being stolen from their parents.

There has been an unreasonable level of trust in the governments of the countries of origin for the children adopted to Sweden.”

According to Human Rights Watch, roughly 60,000 people have been adopted into Sweden. It started with children from South Korea in the 1950s, and then began to include children from China, Chile, Ethiopia, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, peaking in the mid-1970s to 1980s. By the early 2000s, the numbers began to steadily decline.

Amid growing concerns that adopted children may have been taken from their biological parents illegally, the commission found confirmed cases of child trafficking spanning every decade from the 1970s to the 2000s.

Head of the inquiry Anna Singer, professor of civil law, told The Epoch Times that this practice is “winding down by itself.”

Last year, 54 children were adopted to Sweden [from abroad]. … Many countries have ceased putting children up for intercountry adoption,” she said.

“Adoption agencies are not a sustainable solution for meeting the needs of these children. It’s better to try to improve conditions in their countries of origin. Intercountry adoption may have worked to slow down such efforts.”

China in the Spotlight

The final two-volume report released on June 2, the result of a probe that started in 2021, states that Swedish adoption organizations “have taken great risks by operating in China, which has been a closed country with very limited opportunities for transparency throughout the period.”

It states that all children adopted from China were described as abandoned and lacked any background history, making it difficult, or impossible, to assess whether the adoptions were in the children’s best interests.

“Chinese authorities have confirmed that four adoptions to Sweden were linked to the systematic child trafficking in Hunan [Province] that was exposed in 2005,“ the report reads. ”However, it cannot be ruled out that more Swedish adoptions are affected by the child trafficking in China.”

Financial incentives were created, as orphanages in China were compensated with $3,000 to $5,000 per child placed for international adoption. The Swedish supervisory authority found that the orphanages were dependent on these fees.

In total, almost 4,300 adoptions from China have been carried out to date, making China the fourth-largest country of origin for adoptions to Sweden in terms of total numbers.

Most adoptions occurred during the period 2000 to 2010, when more than 3,200 children were adopted from China to Sweden.

China is one of the few countries that approved adoption of young children to single adoptive parents.

The report also states that Swedish adoption companies failed to ensure that children were made available for adoption through proper channels or that the process was in the children’s best interests.

In many cases, signed documentation from biological parents was missing, even when those parents were known. Files also often lacked critical details needed for adoptees to understand their origins.

Ultimately, it is the Swedish State that has failed to protect the rights of children in intercountry adoption activities,“ the report reads. ”This means that the State must take responsibility for what has happened and take measures to ensure that it does not happen again.”

It recommends an official apology to adopted people and their families as well as financial aid to help those who have been adopted to travel to their country of origin.

The Netherlands said in December 2024 that it would phase out international adoptions over the next six years, after an official 2021 report found that children had been stolen or bought from their birth parents in cases going back to the 1960s.

Switzerland said in January that it also plans to end international adoptions, amid similar concerns of abuse.

Roger Sahlstrom and Reuters contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/06/2025 – 03:30

Germany Considers Implementing Retirement Accounts For Kids As Young As 6 Years Old

Germany Considers Implementing Retirement Accounts For Kids As Young As 6 Years Old

Because what six-year-old doesn’t want to start planning for retirement?

Germany’s government is floating an “early start pension” for kids aged 6 to 18, according to Fortune.

Instead of relying on your own paycheck (which, at 6, probably isn’t that robust), the government would pony up 10 euros ($11) a month per child. Over 12 years, that’s a whopping 1,440 euros—plus whatever compounding interest the Tooth Fairy manages to generate.

Once they hit 18, these kids can add their own cash and get tax-free gains—but no withdrawals until they’re 67. Because nothing says “carpe diem” like waiting six decades to cash in.

Fortune writes that this is all part of Germany’s plan to reform pensions, bolster private saving, and generally get people thinking about the unaffordable retirements that plague modern life. With people living longer and working well past 65, retirement is looking less like a golden sunset and more like a second job. The share of Americans over 65 who are still working has doubled since the 1980s—because that beach house just won’t buy itself.

Financial gurus like Suze Orman say Gen Z could retire millionaires if they start investing early enough. She crunches the numbers: just $100 a month at 12% growth could net them over a million bucks by 65. Now imagine starting at age 6 instead of 26—who knows, maybe they’ll be sipping umbrella drinks while their parents are still on the clock.

That is, if a million bucks even buys you a coffee in America decades from now…

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/06/2025 – 02:45

Foreigners Dominate In Violent Criminal Offenses On German Public Transport

Foreigners Dominate In Violent Criminal Offenses On German Public Transport

Via Remix News,

The issue of crime on public transport in Germany is a major topic, as the left wants more people taking public transport while at the same time promoting open borders, which makes public transport more and more dangerous. The data has shown for years that migrants are sexually assaulting women, partaking in knife attacks, and generally making public transport hell for Germans, and the latest data from the southern state of Baden-Württemberg only highlights this trend.

There, a recent inquiry by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) to the Ministry of the Interior, Digitalization, and Municipalities reveals a concerning picture of safety on public transport in Baden-Württemberg.

In 2024, Baden-Württemberg’s public transport system saw a total of 30,950 individuals identified as suspects for various crimes, averaging about 85 suspects per day. It is important to note that this figure does not include violations for immigration offenses, which can only be committed by foreigners, of which there were an additional 20,339 violations of immigration law, bringing the total recorded incidents in public transport to 51,289.

Significantly, foreigners also lead the statistics across all other crime categories, including violent crime. Out of the 30,950 suspects for crimes on public transport, 19,138 (62 percent) were non-German, compared to 11,812 (38 percent) German suspects.

A deeper dive into specific crime categories further highlights the trend:

  • Violent Crime: Of the 1,942 suspects recorded for violent crimes in 2024 (including murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and various forms of bodily harm), 1,037 (53 percent) were non-German, while 906 (47 percent) were German.
  • Theft Offenses: In the 2,180 suspects registered for theft, 1,397 (64 percent) were foreigners, compared to 783 (36 percent) Germans.
  • Drug Offenses: Non-German suspects also formed the majority in drug-related offenses, accounting for 1,216 (56 percent) out of 2,189 total suspects, with 973 (44 percent) being German.
  • Weapon Offenses: Out of 422 suspects, 257 (61 percent) were non-German, while 165 (39 percent) were German.

The number of suspects in knife attacks on public transport has continuously increased over the past three years in Baden-Württemberg, rising from 181 in 2022 to 184 in 2023, and reaching 224 suspects in 2024.

Of the 224 knife attack cases, foreigners constituted the majority, with 127 suspects (approximately 57 percent), compared to 97 German suspects (43 percent). Among the foreign knife attackers, individuals from asylum-seeker countries topped the list: Syria (30 suspects), Tunisia (14), Morocco (13), and Algeria (9). Turkey and Iraq each had six suspects, while Poland and Afghanistan each had five.

A “knife attack” is defined as an offense where an attack with a knife is directly threatened or carried out against a person.

It should be noted of the German offenders, many of them have a migration background, but Germany does not collect that data. However, in some cases where the names of suspects have been obtained, many of these German offenders clearly have foreign backgrounds, as data for gang rapes in North Rhine-Westphalia reveals.

In addition, foreigners only make up about 16 percent of the population of Germany, yet their extreme over representation in the crime statistics is striking.

Passengers are not the only ones being threatened with exploding crime levels, but also public transportation staff. German train unions have raised the alarm.

“I have an average of three employees sitting in my Erfurt office every week for legal advice. They were attacked, spat on, insulted, threatened or pushed,” said Steffi Recknagel, the head of the Railway and Transport Union (EVG) in Thuringia, during an interview.

“The worst case was that a train attendant was threatened with a knife,” said Recknagel, while another was physically attacked from behind and “the air was knocked out of her.”

In other cases, female train workers were “slapped,” “kicked,” had their clothing pulled, and were “treated aggressively.” In some cases, the perpetrators told these female workers they were not allowed to speak because they are women.

The union head in that region said that while there are problematic spots across the German state, there is one particularly bad stretch between the state capital of Erfurt and Suhl. She said the “extreme” situation there is due to the presence of a refugee center in Suhl, which features mainly Syrian, Afghan, and Turkish migrants, who travel to Erfurt and back again on a regular basis.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/06/2025 – 02:00

Détente? Musk Hints At Path Forward On BBB; Trump Team Schedules Friday Call

Détente? Musk Hints At Path Forward On BBB; Trump Team Schedules Friday Call

Update (2358ET):  The optics of what happened this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump are wild – with Musk standing up for MAGA ideals that Trump campaigned on, and Trump peddling a bill that came from the swamp. Musk’s key issues are that it raises the debt ceiling another $5 trillion, while – and this part is in contention – the bill either raises the deficit by $2.4 trillion, or lowers it by $1.4 trillion – depending on who you believe. We note that it also makes little to no effort to actually do anything about the waste, fraud, or abuse found by DOGE. 

So, following a rollercoaster of a day (scroll down if you just emerged from a coma), on top of a rollercoaster week, Musk struck a different tone Thursday night on X after a long 12 hours which saw Trump threaten to pull federal funding from Musk’s companies for opposing the BBB, which was met Musk calling his bluff and declaring he would decommission the SpaceX Dragon (the only operational US spacecraft capable of transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station), proposing a new political party “that actually represents the 80% in the middle,” implying Trump is a pedophile, and endorsing Trump’s impeachment

Now that the dust has settled, Musk appears to have struck somewhat of a conciliatory tone Thursday night – first posting that he would not in fact decommission Dragon. 

He also reposted several things on X hinting at a path forward if Republicans fix the bill. 

Musk also reposted Senator Rand Paul suggesting that he would vote for the BBB “if we got real spending cuts” instead of “the largest debt increase in US history.” 

He also replied “You’re not wrong” to Bill Ackman’s suggestion that Trump and Musk “should make peace for the benefit of our great country.” 

And then he made fun of himself.

Meanwhile, when contacted for comment by Politico, Trump said “Oh it’s okay,” adding “It’s going very well, never done better.” 

Earlier Thursday — as Musk raged about the cost of legislation that is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the deficit — Trump tempered some of his commentary on his own social media platform at the urging of White House aides.

The aides advised him to focus on the bill and getting it through the Senate instead of the conflict with Musk, according to one person close to the White House who was granted anonymity to discuss private exchanges. -Politico

According to the report, White House aides have scheduled a all on Friday with Musk to broker a peace.

In short, Trump and Republicans need to “Drop the tax cuts, cut some pork, and get the bill through” so it aligns with MAGA and DOGE priorities (what you were elected to do), kith and make up, and make sure JD doesn’t have to spend Christmas at two houses this year. 

Overnight shares of Tesla were higher on the news.

*  *  *

Like a vendor at a ballgame parking lot, we sold a ton of these waxed canvas hats today amid the drama. Thank you for your support. 

Click hat… add to cart… check out… receive awesome hat…

Update (1725ET): As the Trump-Musk feud continues to escalate, Musk endorsed the notion that ‘Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him,’ floated by Malaysian US political commentator Ian Miles Cheong.

Earlier…

Aaaand Musk just announced he’ll begin decommissioning the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft ‘immediately’

He also doubled down on the Epstein claim…

While Trump defenders such as Laura Loomer pushed back:

Trump, meanwhile, posted what could be considered somewhat of an attempt to de-escalate – that he ‘doesn’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,” adding “This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given.”

Update (1615ET): Just as the spat between Elon Musk and President Trump seemed to have reached cruising altitude, Musk hit the afterburners – claiming on X that President Trump is “in the Epstein files,” adding “That is the real reason they have not been made public…

Meanwhile, shares in TSLA are down 16% as the market cascades lower. Fun fact, Tesla was the most bought retail stock over the last week. 

*  *  *

Update (1255ET): The tech-bro industrial complex has to be shitting themselves as the Trump-Musk spat just hit a new gear; Elon Musk is calling for a new political party, while Trump just threatened to pull Musk’s contracts. 

Kevin Dietsch/Saul Loeb/AFP/GETTY

In a Thursday afternoon post to Truth Social, Trump said that Elon was “wearing thin,” and that he “Asked him to leave.” 

I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!

Trump then ‘truthed’ that “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!”

“Such an obvious lie. So sad.” Musk replied…

Before calling Trump’s bluff…

And is calling for a new political party…

Which has an 84% ‘yes’ rating…

*  *  *

You can support ZeroHedge by picking up a waxed canvas hat!

Click hat… add to cart… check out… receive awesome hat…

Update (1255ET): Well that escalated quickly…

Elon Musk is now raging on X against President Trump, after Trump talked greasy to the press over Musk’s opposition to the “Big Beautiful Bill” over the past several days. 

Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” Musk wrote, adding “Such ingratitude.” 

Meanwhile Tesla stock is down 9%…

And Palantir is down 5% as the tech bro darlings come under pressure… 

*  *  *

President Trump has weighed in after Elon Musk began publicly bashing the GOP’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ telling reporters on Thursday that he’s ‘very disappointed in Elon,’ and that Musk only opposes the bill because they eliminated electric vehicle tax credits from it. 

“Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate which was a lot of money for electric vehicles. They’re having a hard time the electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. Elon knew this from the beginning,” said Trump. 

Trump also suggested that Musk “recommended somebody he knew very well to run NASA. I didn’t think it was appropriate, and he happened to be a Democrat, like totally Democrat.”

Musk, meanwhile responded with “Whatever” to Trump…

“Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,” Musk wrote. “In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!”

“Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.” 

And then there’s this…

He then addressed Trump’s specific comments regarding the bill, posting “False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!”

Prior to Trump’s comments, Musk spent much of the morning re-posting old Trump tweets calling for no ficits and to stop raising the debt ceiling. 

Over the past several days Musk has dug in over the issue – posting to X on Tuesday, “I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.”

This sent the White House scrambling to do damage control – with Budget Director Russ Vought sending Congress a request for a $9.4 billion clawback for unspent foreign aid funding – which if you’re Musk, after what DOGE has uncovered, is a huge slap in the face.

On Wednesday, Musk continued to rage on X – posting: “Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! Kill the Bill.” – followed by a ‘Kill Bill’ movie poster featuring Uma Thurman. 

Musk’s solution? A new spending bill that doesn’t jack the debt ceiling by $5 trillion dollars while “massively” growing the deficit. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson also spoke out against Musk, saying “I think Elon is flat wrong.” 

Developing…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 23:58

Peter Daszak’s Smokescreen Attack on Dr. Bhattacharya

Peter Daszak’s Smokescreen Attack on Dr. Bhattacharya

Authored by Randall Bock via The Brownstone Institute,

Peter Daszak’s recent X posts (June 2, 2025) labeling Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH Director, an “anti-science Luddite” who is “destroying public health” are a masterclass in projection.

Daszak, former head of EcoHealth Alliance (facilitator and co-conspirator of that recent pandemic, what was it called? Oh yes, SARS CoV-2 Covid-19), accuses Bhattacharya of having a “vendetta against the NIH” and claims his policies will cost lives, while pointing fingers at organizations like Brownstone Institute for being part of a right-wing conspiracy (how original!) to dismantle science. Let’s cut through the noise.

Calling Bhattacharya anti-science is absurd. Erstwhile Stanford professor and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, Bhattacharya has consistently championed evidence-based public health, advocating for open scientific debate over dogmatic policies. His focus on data-driven approaches—like considering natural immunity and the harms of lockdowns—earned him censorship under the previous administration. His leadership at the NIH promises transparency and rigor, both of which seem to terrify Daszak—operating without (his previous sponsor) Dr. Fauci’s golden parachute of a Biden/autopen pardon.

Now, let’s talk about Daszak’s version of “science.” EcoHealth Alliance, under his watch, funneled US. taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses—research that may have contributed to the unleashing of the novel coronavirus in Wuhan. 

As I detailed in my Brownstone articles, Daszak’s collaboration with WIV’s “Bat Woman” Zhengli-Li Shi involved modifying coronaviruses to make them more infectious to humans, fitting the NIH’s own definition of gain-of-function despite his denials. That second article of mine only came about after EcoHealth Alliance’s bullying. When I had pointed out EcoHealth’s complicity in my original Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Own Gain-of-Function, Daszak’s minions tried to bully Brownstone into retracting the reference. 

When that failed, he blocked me on X to dodge accountability.

How “science-y” is that? Blocking someone for raising legitimate questions about your role in a global pandemic isn’t the mark of a scientist—it’s the mark of someone with something to hide.

Daszak’s attacks on Bhattacharya are a distraction from his own failures. Why were US funds sent to a CCP-controlled lab with poor oversight instead of trusted allies? Why the lack of transparency? These questions remain unanswered, and his attempts to silence critics—like me—only deepen the suspicion around EcoHealth’s actions.

Science thrives on open debate, not censorship. Bhattacharya represents a return to that principle at the NIH, while Daszak’s behavior—blocking dissenters and evading tough questions—shows what anti-science really looks like. The public deserves better, and with Bhattacharya leading the NIH, we might finally get it.

NEVER FORGET: Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance tried to quash and have Brownstone retract my: Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Own “Gain-of-Function”—October 9, 2023.

Instead, I researched further, doubled down, and produced this: “EcoHealth Alliance’s Wuhan-Virus Dalliances” October 22, 2023.

After which, crickets…Peter Daszak blocked me on X.com. The essence of bullies is cowardice.

Please see also my Fauci’s ‘DNA of Caring’ By Randall Bock, August 9, 2024, Brownstone.org.

Republished from the author’s Substack

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 22:35

Bayer’s Push For State-Level Roundup Immunity Sparks Backlash In The Heartland

Bayer’s Push For State-Level Roundup Immunity Sparks Backlash In The Heartland

In a brazen bid to shield itself from a tsunami of lawsuits over its toxic Roundup herbicide, Monsanto (acquired by Bayer Pharmaceutical) has unleashed a multi-state lobbying blitz to secure immunity from liability, with Missouri as a key battleground. 

The agrochemical giant, reeling from over $8.68 billion in pre-reduction jury verdicts and $11 billion in settlements, is pushing state legislatures to pass bills that would block “failure-to-warn” claims tied to glyphosate, Roundup’s cancer-linked ingredient

But their heavy-handed tactics have sparked fierce resistance, exposing the corporate underbelly of a company desperate to dodge accountability.

In Missouri, home to Bayer’s North American Crop Science headquarters, the company ramped up its lobbyists from four to nine – or about 1.29 lobbyists for each of the seven Senators of the Missouri Senate Agriculture Committee – directly before introducing Senate Bill 14, and its companion House Bill 2763.

Both bills – nearly identical to those seen in each state where courts have awarded billions for harms – were aimed at shielding Monsanto-Bayer from lawsuits claiming Roundup causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Missouri trial lawyer Matt Clement has successfully represented clients in their claims that Roundup was the cause of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Monsanto is trying to push legislation that would take away constitutional rights,” Clement told ZeroHedge. “It [Bayer] has not been successful in getting courts to buy its preemption argument, so it is resorting to trying to pass state legislation that will do what most courts have refused to do.”  

Missouri courts have already hammered Bayer with massive verdicts: $611 million, upheld on appeals in 2025 for three plaintiffs in Cole County (originally $1.56 billion), and $1.25 million for John Durnell in St. Louis. 

With 40,000 cases still pending in Missouri alone, Bayer’s panic seemed palpable. Their strategy? Convince lawmakers that EPA-approved labels, which omit cancer warnings – despite jurys awarding plaintiffs a whopping total of $19.68 billion in verdicts and settlements to-date – should preempt state litigation.

State law claims, which Monsanto is trying to take away with the proposed legislation, are the only way for private citizens to hold companies accountable,” Clement explains. 

In 1947, Congress created The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Last significantly amended in 1972, FIFRA – administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – requires pesticides to be registered with the EPA before they can be sold or distributed in the United States. 

The law aims to ensure that pesticides are safe for human health and the environment when used according to their labeling.

However, when FIFRA was last reviewed by the EPA, the alleged harms of Roundup (backed by $19.68 billion in settlements) were not yet known. In addition, courts have held that private citizens can’t use FIFRA to sue pesticide manufacturers for damages if they are injured by a chemical.

In other words,” Clement tells ZeroHedge, “only the EPA can enforce the terms of that law. Because the EPA only reviews the chemicals every fifteen years, there is no real enforcement mechanism except state law. If the proposed legislation takes that away, there is nothing left for an injured person to do.” 

Due to the fact that registration and warning labels are administrative law, the only way to hold a company like Monsanto-Bayer accountable for not properly warning consumers, is through state-based constitutional law. Rather than pay out billions in on-going settlements, Bayer shifted its focus to PR and lobbying state lawmakers. 

Bayer’s campaign, funneled through the Modern Ag Alliance and “murky groups” like the Protecting America Initiative, has spent an estimated $150,000 to $700,000 across 12 states, including Missouri, Iowa, and Georgia. 

In Missouri, nine Freedom Caucus Senators were targeted—Nick Schroer, Brad Hudson, Rick Brattin, Ben Brown, David Gregory, Mike Moon, Joe Nicola, Adam Schnelting, and Jill Carter—with vicious direct-mail flyers. 

The mail flyers accused the Freedom Caucus members of betraying American farmers and aiding China by opposing the bill. The senators, incensed by what they called “dark money” attacks, vowed to investigate via the Missouri Ethics Commission, effectively killing HB 2763 in the Senate through a filibuster.

The missteps were catastrophic.

Bayer underestimated bipartisan fury, with 24 House Republicans and 48 Democrats rejecting the bill. 

Aggressive ads and sponsorship of Governor Mike Kehoe’s inauguration reeked of corporate overreach, alienating allies and fueling perceptions of prioritizing profits over public health. Critics also pointed to Monsanto’s history of manipulating science, as exposed in California courts, which found the company focused on PR over safety.

Nationwide, Bayer’s playbook proved more successful as Georgia passed an immunity bill (SB 144) into law this year. The new law could impact a $2.1 billion jury verdict awarded to plaintiff John Barnes, as Bayer is expected to appeal the case. 

North Dakota and Montana also passed shields, but legislative efforts faced resistance in states like Iowa, Florida, Tennessee and Idaho. With 54,000–67,000 lawsuits still looming and a $16 billion litigation war chest, Bayer’s now scrambling for help from the U.S. Supreme Court and lobbying hard for Farm Bill amendments that reinforce federal preemption.

However, Congress could just as easily amend FIFRA to explicitly preserve states’ rights or strengthen EPA labeling oversight. Meanwhile, the Trump administration can also update EPA regulations or issue executive guidance to limit the scope of federal preemption

These steps would close the loophole Bayer is attempting to exploit at the state level, ensuring victims of Roundup’s alleged harms, can seek justice without federal interference

Either way, the fight highlights the need for regulatory reforms as the outcome will shape pesticide regulation for years to come.

Bayer’s attempt to rewrite the rules and escape accountability has only hardened resolve among farmers, health advocates, and legislators alike. But, just as this saga illustrates the “corporate capture” outlined in the MAHA Report, the fight over Roundup’s label is far from over.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 22:10

Détente? Musk Hints At Path Forward On BBB, Will Not Decommission Dragon Spacecraft

Détente? Musk Hints At Path Forward On BBB, Will Not Decommission Dragon Spacecraft

Update (2204ET):  The optics of what happened this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump are wild – with Musk standing up for MAGA ideals that Trump campaigned on, and Trump peddling a bill that came from the swamp. Musk’s key issues are that it raises the debt ceiling another $5 trillion, while – and this part is in contention – the bill either raises the deficit by $2.4 trillion, or lowers it by $1.4 trillion – depending on who you believe. We note that it also makes little to no effort to actually do anything about the waste, fraud, or abuse found by DOGE. 

So, following a rollercoaster of a day (scroll down if you just emerged from a coma), on top of a rollercoaster week, Musk struck a different tone Thursday night on X after a long 12 hours which saw Trump threaten to pull federal funding from Musk’s companies for opposing the BBB, which was met Musk calling his bluff and declaring he would decommission the SpaceX Dragon (the only operational US spacecraft capable of transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station), proposing a new political party “that actually represents the 80% in the middle,” implying Trump is a pedophile, and endorsing Trump’s impeachment

Now that the dust has settled, Musk appears to have struck somewhat of a conciliatory tone Thursday night – first posting that he would not in fact decommission Dragon. 

He also reposted several things on X hinting at a path forward if Republicans fix the bill. 

Musk also reposted Senator Rand Paul suggesting that he would vote for the BBB “if we got real spending cuts” instead of “the largest debt increase in US history.” 

He also replied “You’re not wrong” to Bill Ackman’s suggestion that Trump and Musk “should make peace for the benefit of our great country.” 

And then he made fun of himself.

In short, Trump and Republicans need to “Drop the tax cuts, cut some pork, and get the bill through” so it aligns with MAGA and DOGE priorities (what you were elected to do), kith and make up, and make sure JD doesn’t have to spend Christmas at two houses this year. 

*  *  *

Like a vendor at a ballgame parking lot, we sold a ton of these waxed canvas hats today amid the drama. Thank you for your support. 

Click hat… add to cart… check out… receive awesome hat…

Update (1725ET): As the Trump-Musk feud continues to escalate, Musk endorsed the notion that ‘Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him,’ floated by Malaysian US political commentator Ian Miles Cheong.

Earlier…

Aaaand Musk just announced he’ll begin decommissioning the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft ‘immediately’

He also doubled down on the Epstein claim…

While Trump defenders such as Laura Loomer pushed back:

Trump, meanwhile, posted what could be considered somewhat of an attempt to de-escalate – that he ‘doesn’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,” adding “This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given.”

Update (1615ET): Just as the spat between Elon Musk and President Trump seemed to have reached cruising altitude, Musk hit the afterburners – claiming on X that President Trump is “in the Epstein files,” adding “That is the real reason they have not been made public…

Meanwhile, shares in TSLA are down 16% as the market cascades lower. Fun fact, Tesla was the most bought retail stock over the last week. 

*  *  *

Update (1255ET): The tech-bro industrial complex has to be shitting themselves as the Trump-Musk spat just hit a new gear; Elon Musk is calling for a new political party, while Trump just threatened to pull Musk’s contracts. 

Kevin Dietsch/Saul Loeb/AFP/GETTY

In a Thursday afternoon post to Truth Social, Trump said that Elon was “wearing thin,” and that he “Asked him to leave.” 

I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!

Trump then ‘truthed’ that “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!”

“Such an obvious lie. So sad.” Musk replied…

Before calling Trump’s bluff…

And is calling for a new political party…

Which has an 84% ‘yes’ rating…

*  *  *

You can support ZeroHedge by picking up a waxed canvas hat!

Click hat… add to cart… check out… receive awesome hat…

Update (1255ET): Well that escalated quickly…

Elon Musk is now raging on X against President Trump, after Trump talked greasy to the press over Musk’s opposition to the “Big Beautiful Bill” over the past several days. 

Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” Musk wrote, adding “Such ingratitude.” 

Meanwhile Tesla stock is down 9%…

And Palantir is down 5% as the tech bro darlings come under pressure… 

*  *  *

President Trump has weighed in after Elon Musk began publicly bashing the GOP’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ telling reporters on Thursday that he’s ‘very disappointed in Elon,’ and that Musk only opposes the bill because they eliminated electric vehicle tax credits from it. 

“Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate which was a lot of money for electric vehicles. They’re having a hard time the electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. Elon knew this from the beginning,” said Trump. 

Trump also suggested that Musk “recommended somebody he knew very well to run NASA. I didn’t think it was appropriate, and he happened to be a Democrat, like totally Democrat.”

Musk, meanwhile responded with “Whatever” to Trump…

“Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,” Musk wrote. “In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!”

“Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.” 

And then there’s this…

He then addressed Trump’s specific comments regarding the bill, posting “False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!”

Prior to Trump’s comments, Musk spent much of the morning re-posting old Trump tweets calling for no ficits and to stop raising the debt ceiling. 

Over the past several days Musk has dug in over the issue – posting to X on Tuesday, “I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.”

This sent the White House scrambling to do damage control – with Budget Director Russ Vought sending Congress a request for a $9.4 billion clawback for unspent foreign aid funding – which if you’re Musk, after what DOGE has uncovered, is a huge slap in the face.

On Wednesday, Musk continued to rage on X – posting: “Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! Kill the Bill.” – followed by a ‘Kill Bill’ movie poster featuring Uma Thurman. 

Musk’s solution? A new spending bill that doesn’t jack the debt ceiling by $5 trillion dollars while “massively” growing the deficit. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson also spoke out against Musk, saying “I think Elon is flat wrong.” 

Developing…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 22:04

Judge Says Education Department Remains Barred From Canceling COVID-19 School Aid

Judge Says Education Department Remains Barred From Canceling COVID-19 School Aid

Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,

A federal judge issued an order on June 3 preserving a previous preliminary injunction that had blocked the Department of Education from rescinding extensions given to states for accessing COVID-19-related funds for school districts.

District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York said the injunction he issued on May 6 will remain in effect amid the ongoing litigation involving 16 states and the District of Columbia, which brought the case on April 10 alleging that the Education Department’s reversal in granting the extensions for accessing the Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) was arbitrary, in violation of the law.

ESF allocated more than $276 billion to support school districts in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

States were initially given until Sept. 30, 2024, to obligate the use of funds, and until Jan. 28, 2025, to access the funds to liquidate the obligations.

The department later granted extensions to the plaintiffs, allowing them to access the funds through March 2026.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon subsequently informed the states in March this year that the previously granted extensions were being rescinded because the pandemic was over and extending the deadline was no longer aligned with the department’s current priorities, although the states could reapply for extensions.

In the June 3 ruling, Ramos ordered the department to process the plaintiffs’ outstanding and future requests for the funding “without delay” and provide a status report detailing the payment.

The department was also barred from enforcing a May 11 directive requiring the plaintiffs to liquidate their obligations under the ESF by May 24, according to the ruling.

The Department of Education did not return a request for comment by publication time.

Government lawyers argued in an April 24 brief that the department’s actions were not arbitrary and capricious “because rescission of the prior extension was within the Department’s discretion” and that they “did not conflict with the relevant appropriations statutes.”

The lawyers also stated that the plaintiffs would not suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction because they still had the option to reapply for a fresh extension but had chosen not to do so.

Ramos issued the preliminary injunction on May 6, blocking the department from rescinding the previously approved extensions for accessing the funds. The judge also required department officials to give the plaintiffs at least 14 days’ notice before making any changes to the extensions.

The lawsuit was brought by the attorneys general of New York, Arizona, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, and the District of Columbia, as well as Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 21:45

Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Mexico’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against U.S. Gunmakers

Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Mexico’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against U.S. Gunmakers

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously tossed out Mexico’s 2021 lawsuit against seven U.S. gunmakers and one wholesaler, ruling that firms like Smith & Wesson and Glock are shielded from liability under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).

Mexico’s lawsuit accused U.S. gunmakers of knowingly enabling illegal firearm sales to dealers linked to drug cartels, fueling cartel violence. The government sought $10 billion in damages and a court order imposing stricter rules on the marketing and distribution of firearms.

Mexico attempted to use PLCAA’s narrow “predicate exception,” claiming the gunmakers knowingly violated federal firearms laws by aiding and abetting illegal sales by U.S. dealers.

Here’s the Supreme Court’s rationale that went into their unanimous decision: 

  • The Court, led by Justice Elena Kagan, found that Mexico’s complaint did not plausibly allege that the manufacturers took deliberate, affirmative steps to facilitate crimes — a requirement for aiding and abetting liability.

  • Allegations that manufacturers failed to monitor dealers or cut off suspected “bad apple” dealers were deemed insufficient. Passive nonfeasance or general market activity does not amount to aiding and abetting.

  • Design and marketing choices (e.g., Spanish-language branding, military-style weapons) were not enough to imply culpability under U.S. law.

Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, acknowledged rampant cartel violent crime, but found that Mexico failed to present allegations strong enough to overcome PLCAA’s liability shield, rejecting claims that the gunmakers aided and abetted illegal firearm sales.

The question presented is whether Mexico’s complaint plausibly pleads that conduct. We conclude it does not,” Kagan wrote.

Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation intended to reduce the flow of guns across the border. Yet Democrats facilitated four years of disastrous open borders under the Biden-Harris regime era… 

*   *   * 

Read the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 21:20

Bongino: FBI Found Sensitive Docs Linked To James Comey; COVID Investigation Reopened

Bongino: FBI Found Sensitive Docs Linked To James Comey; COVID Investigation Reopened

Via VigilantFox.com

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino appeared on Hannity Wednesday night to outline the Bureau’s current priorities and address concerns around national security, immigration, and public health transparency.

The interview offered a detailed look into how the FBI, under the direction of Bongino and Director Kash Patel, is approaching both domestic and international threats during the early stages of a second Trump administration.

Hannity opened by asking about the FBI’s top priorities. Bongino responded by stating that their first objective is preventing large-scale terrorist attacks in major U.S. cities.

We can’t have New York, D.C., or L.A. go boom,” he said.

He explained that this concern is not hypothetical—it shapes their daily operational briefings. Working closely with Patel, Bongino said their mission starts each morning with this scenario in mind.

But he emphasized that other serious threats are on equal footing. He pointed to cyberattacks that could disrupt infrastructure and foreign efforts to infiltrate U.S. intelligence operations.

“The massive cyber threat, the counterintelligence threat,” he said, are now “co-equal priorities.”

Hannity then brought up the southern border. Bongino acknowledged the scale of unlawful entry and said the concern extends beyond numbers to intent.

“There are people here… who want to do bad things—I think that is fairly obvious.”

He said FBI teams are deployed early in the morning to carry out removals and disrupt plots before they can be carried out.

“We have our FBI teams out there at 4:00 AM and 5:00 AM, removing these people from the country, while still preventing a terror attack.”

On the topic of how the Bureau classifies certain acts, Bongino said they are taking a more direct approach.

“We’re not the Federal Bureau of freaking word games anymore.”

He noted that acts involving targeted violence and extremist slogans will be treated as terrorism.

“We’re damn well going to investigate it—as targeted violence and a terror attack.”

He added, “What the hell do you want us to investigate it as? A freaking grand larceny auto?!”

The conversation then shifted to COVID-19. Hannity asked whether the government had misled the public about the virus’s origin.

“Covid origins, are we going to find out information that the government lied to us?”

Bongino answered, “You’re damn right you are. We’re all over that.”

When asked if the misinformation was deliberate, Bongino said an investigation is already underway.

“Well, you’re going to find out. Yeah, listen, that’s the one I am the most optimistic about.”

He shared that reopening the case was one of his first actions in the role.

“I was pretty clear on my social media account that I ordered that case immediately to be looked into again. We have a great investigator on it and I think we should see action on that one shortly.”

Hannity next asked whether former FBI officials would be held accountable. Bongino focused on former Director James Comey, who he said has publicly criticized current FBI leadership.

“Comey, as a matter of fact, the guy who has a lot to say, ironically, about me and Kash—and that’s fine, you know, he is allowed an opinion, he is a free American citizen like anybody else—but we found the items.”

Bongino said those items included sensitive documents.

“I addressed this on Fox & Friends and I can go into a little bit more detail, but we found the things,” Bongino reiterated.

“We found documents—documents that were not where they should have been. And they were not good flattering documents for Jim Comey.”

He framed it as part of a broader issue around internal culture.

“The hubris displayed from a man like Jim Comey, who disgraced the FBI numerous times with his role in Crossfire Hurricane and other abominations, it’s just kind of stunning that he continues to attack our leadership, when we have to clean up the mess that Jim Comey created… as we continue to find stuff from his era and vintage.”

Hannity closed by asking what the FBI might look like a year into a second Trump term. Bongino said the goal is a complete overhaul of operations.

“A year from now, I want the FBI to have played a key role in the deportation of hundreds of thousands of violent criminals from the United States.”

“I want the FBI to have thwarted multiple terror plots that we can’t tell you about every day.”

He said many of those outcomes will remain invisible to the public.

“Sean, every morning we do a briefing, Kash and I, with our ops directors. We can’t sit here and take a victory lap every time something does not go boom,” Bongino said.

“Matter of fact we almost never do it because we can’t.”

He outlined additional goals, including strengthening counterintelligence, addressing Chinese cyber espionage, and confronting the threat posed by drones.

“I want to make sure that our counterintelligence operation is top-notch… that the ever-present threat of the Chinese Communist Party infiltrating our systems, cyber spying on us—that by the end we have made significant progress,” he said.

“I want to be sure the drone threat—that we’ve taken action on it, not just talked about it.”

Finally, Bongino explained that the Bureau’s success should be reflected in measurable public safety outcomes.

“I want to make sure we can look back to the American people and say, look—with President Trump’s leadership, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Director Patel—the murder rate is at a historic low.”

“Crime rates have gone down,” Bongino said, adding, “The border is sealed, and your FBI took a part in that.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/05/2025 – 18:25