68.4 F
Chicago
Tuesday, October 27, 2026
Home Blog Page 1497

Iran’s Internet Blackout Enters Day Two As Starlink “Beams Are On” 

Iran’s Internet Blackout Enters Day Two As Starlink “Beams Are On” 

One path to regime change in Iran involves targeted strikes on state media infrastructure, designed to sever the regime’s grip on domestic narratives. In parallel, Western technology—such as Starlink terminals—could flood the information vacuum with uncensored internet, enabling the West’s long-prepared psychological operations to win hearts and minds on the ground. 

Early-phase operations appear to have already involved Israeli airstrikes targeting IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting) facilities and associated communication nodes in Tehran at the start of the week. The bombing of Iran’s state broadcasters may paralyze the regime’s centralized propaganda apparatus. There has been no confirmation if the regime’s capacity to broadcast propaganda has been degraded.

The Israeli military pointed out it targeted a “communications center of the Iranian regime,” while Iran’s foreign ministry called the strike a “war crime.” 

By late in the week, the NetBlocks website, which monitors global Internet activity, reported that internet activity across Iran had collapsed to near zero. 

With state media nodes targeted by IDF airstrikes and ground-based communication infrastructure in shambles, the emergence of Starlink internet connectivity inside Iran—either smuggled in or activated via third-party coordination—strongly suggests that the next move by Western forces could involve a domestic operation to supply the population with real-time, censorship-free internet that bypasses state firewalls. 

A week ago, SpaceX’s Elon Musk confirmed that Starlink “beams are on” after the Iranian regime cut the internet. 

Neutralizing state media outlets while activating external internet access could mark the West’s strategic aim to decapitate the regime’s information control, thereby accelerating public disillusionment, fueling color revolution mobilization efforts, and laying the groundwork for all the necessary ingredients for regime change. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 18:50

FDA Halts Trials That Send Americans’ Cells To China, Other ‘Hostile Countries’

FDA Halts Trials That Send Americans’ Cells To China, Other ‘Hostile Countries’

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on June 18 announced a halt to clinical trials that involve sending cells from Americans to “hostile countries” until they can confirm Americans have granted informed consent.

Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary in Washington, in a file photograph. Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images

FDA officials said that a security rule finalized in late 2024 under the previous administration, and implemented in April, limits exports of sensitive data to China and other countries of concern, but that the rule contains an exemption for companies sending biological samples such as DNA for processing overseas as part of trials regulated by the agency.

Dr. Marty Makary, the FDA’s commissioner, and Dr. Vinay Prasad, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a video released by the agency that they only learned about the exception this week.

“Americans have their, can have their cells removed for cancer treatment, sent to China, where they are genetically engineered that is genetically edited, sent back to the United States, where it’s then infused back into an American,” Makary said. “And so from a pure national security standpoint, it sounds very concerning.”

Prasad said that the cells “can be engineered to be potent killers of targets that can be found anywhere” and that scientists may not be able to fully test them on their way back into the United States.

“In cases of personal health information, Americans’ identity, in cases of national security, I think we have to be extremely strict and really protect American interests here,” he added later.

The FDA said in a statement that there are signs that Americans participating in some of the trials were not informed about their biological material being sent overseas, and that the transfer may have exposed the genetic data to misuse by foreign governments, including the Chinese Communist Party.

The agency said it is now reviewing all of the trials that relied on the exemption to the security rule. Officials say they’re going to require that companies “demonstrate full transparency, ethical consent, and domestic handling of sensitive biological materials” before trials are allowed to resume.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya welcomed the development.

“Our goal is to protect Americans’ sensitive biological data while continuing to support life-saving innovation in a way that is safe, secure, and worthy of the public’s trust,” he said in a statement. “This exemption requested created a dangerous blind spot in our research security that put the privacy and trust of American participants at risk. We are assessing the scope of this issue to ensure that no NIH dollars are supporting clinical trials that compromise data integrity, patient consent, or national security.”

Officials said the moves are aimed at following an executive order signed by then-President Joe Biden in 2024, as well as an additional order signed in May by President Donald Trump.

Biden’s order stated that the access of countries of concern to Americans’ sensitive personal data “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat” and instructed government officials to restrict such access. Trump’s order directed officials to end federal funding of life-science research occurring in foreign countries without adequate oversight.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 18:25

Nebraska ICE Raid Debunks Claim That The US Needs Migrant Labor

Nebraska ICE Raid Debunks Claim That The US Needs Migrant Labor

The primary argument among progressives on the issue of mass deportations is that “criminals are fine” but kicking Pedro the farm worker or Juanita the waitress back to Mexico is unacceptable because they are doing jobs that native born Americans refuse to do.

First, the Trump campaign made it clear from the beginning that they planned to deport all illegals, not just those that commit crimes after they cross the border.  Second, the narrative of essential migrant workers is based on a lie; Americans do want and need most of the jobs being stolen by foreign invaders.  

An ICE raid this week at the Glenn Valley Foods meat packing plant in Omaha, Nebraska resulted in at least 75 illegals detained out of 150 workers total workers.  The majority are now being deported, triggering an angry leftist protest. 

With the plant losing so many workers at the same time the concern was that it would have to immediately shut down. Every employee at Glenn Valley Foods, including those who were detained by ICE, has been approved through E-Verify, according to the company owner Gary Rohwer. When he told this to DHS during the raid, an agency official described the system they operate as flawed and easy to cheat.

It’s also important to remember that these are vetting systems restructured by the Biden Administration and it’s likely most of the illegals were hired during Biden’s term.  About a third of the remaining staff at Glenn Valley Foods showed up to work the next day, with many staying home because they “felt afraid or traumatized”, resulting in a roughly 20% drop in production.  No illegals will dare apply at any of the surrounding manufacturing plants – In other words, the raid was a success. 

The company is now engaged in a hiring frenzy and they are getting a positive response.  Despite his claim that manufacturers will collapse without migrants, Rohwer admitted that the packing plant immediately received over 100 new applications and only five of the potential employees are immigrants.  That’s right, the illegals were stealing jobs from native born Americans who were willing to work.

Workers on the production line at Glenn Valley Foods earn $18 to $19 an hour, Rohwer says.  How much the illegal workers were getting paid is not known, but on average migrants work for 30% less in any given industry, driving down wages for Americans and undercutting employment opportunities.

The Labor Department’s May jobs report, released earlier this month, showed both an increase in wages and a substantial decline in the immigrant labor force, due in part to border czar Tom Homan’s execution of the president’s deportation plan.  More than a million foreign-born workers have exited the US workforce since March. 

The Omaha example helps to debunk claims by Democrats that illegal migrants are an integral part of the US economy that the country “can’t live without”.  In fact, there are millions of Americans citizens ready to fill these jobs if only given the opportunity to work without being pushed out by cheap foreign labor.   

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 18:00

Anxiety Attack

Anxiety Attack

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”

– Marcus Aurelius

You must have noticed by now how this Fourth Turning bidness disorders the collective mind.

The churning zeitgeist is hard on the nerves, while something strange is birthed by mankind, the end of one way of life and the beginning of another.

Everybody’s got a story, and most of them are pretty spooky — A-I Globalist hell. . . de-pop and neo-slavery. . . chemtrail death. . . lizard people. . . caliphate on-the-march across Western Civ. . . World War Three. . . escape to Mars. . . . Mercy!

The last thing you might imagine is a tranquil evening in the town square among happy and prosperous neighbors, the dogs frisking and the children chasing each other as lights begin to twinkle against the lovely violet sky. Rather, you have to wonder just when is that hard rain a’gonna fall? When will some obdurate enemy try to bust a cap in your country’s ass? And at the center of this psychic maelstrom, the provocative visage of Mr. Trump.

So, let’s stipulate that it’s natural to be alarmed by events. But must you lose your mind? Many did during the Covid set-up, and they have not recovered. Most particularly the political Left. The Covid operation was supposed to rid the world of DJ Trump for good, and it flopped. What it accomplished politically for four years was to demonstrate that the Left cannot be trusted to run our national affairs. That, and the cumulative failures of lawfare, have made the Left crazier than ever — while the Democratic Party goes broke and bleeds out support-wise.

Meanwhile, the political Right struggles to hold things together, especially the morale of the people. The great national megaphones — CNN, The New York Times, et al. — are no help at all. They only multiply the mental disorder. And they will do everything possible to undermine the efforts of MAGA to reform a system that foundered under corruption and delusion. Where there is not gridlock these days, chaos breaks out. . . violence of action and opinion.

The focus of all this angst for the moment is Israel. Suspicion runs deep that Israel “owns” America, bends us to its will, treats us like a mere lackey in its quest to dominate the world. It does this, they say, through AIPAC, its chief lobbyist, stuffing money into every pocket and every campaign treasure-chest in DC. In reality, political payoff-wise, AIPAC, at $3.3-million (according to OpenSecrets.org) doesn’t hold a candle to the National Association of Realtors at $63.5-million, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, at $30-million, and the US Chamber of Commerce, at $29.6-million.

Of course, the AIPAC suspicion tends to redound upon plain-old, age-old hatin’ on the Jews. (Full disclosure, yours truly is one.) It’s true enough, for such a low percentage of the US population, Jews seem to run an awful lot of things here: Wall Street firms, Ivy League universities, medical research, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Broadway, the news media. How to account for that? Well. . . it is said that in the shtetls of old Europe, the richest fathers married off their daughters to the smartest young men in the village. Hence, their offspring sailed into Ellis Island with a certain advantage. It could be as simple as that. What else might it be? Luciferian magic, some seem to think.

So now, obviously, Israel is engaged in trying to beat the crap out of Iran in order to persuade them to discontinue that country’s quest for deliverable nukes. Every other means of persuasion has failed, you understand, while Iran has never ceased to advertise its wish to “wipe Israel off the map” — a leitmotif not subject to disambiguation. Strange to relate, this has utterly inflamed the political Left against Israel and the Jews. Strange especially because until the day-before-yesterday the political Left in America was dominated by Jewish orgs, Jewish money, and Jewish individuals.

As we speak, Jewish Democratic Party lawyers run the Lawfare endeavor: Norm Eisen, Marc Elias, Benjamin Wittes, Michael Bromwich, Brooke Goldstein (Exec Director of The Lawfare Project org). Marc Elias has served as the Left’s chief election law finagler through three national elections, while Norm Eisen coached Special Counsel Jack Smith, New York AG Letitia James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg in mounting their cases against Donald Trump.

Now, ironically-to-the-max, The Lawfare project is battling against the wild outbreak of antisemitism on Ivy League campuses (surprise, surprise) — Harvard, in particular, where the antisemitic frolics are presided over by the university’s Jewish president, Alan Garber. So, now it’s Jew-on-Jew, which is just another angle on the political Left eating itself alive. In case you’re wondering, I consider the Jewish lawfare ninjas a disgrace to my ethnic group, for the simple reason that their years’ long exploits against Mr. Trump have been altogether garishly dishonest. The lawfare gang has done much more damage to our country than AIPAC ever has.

And also now, at this inflection point in the Fourth Turning, Mr. Trump stands by in Israel’s campaign to put Iran’s nuke project out-of-business. This dilemma has inflamed both ends of the political spectrum. Looks like Mr. Trump is very reluctant to commit the US to an act of war. He is apparently unconvinced that our bunker-buster MOABs can successfully penetrate Iran’s nuclear Fordo mountain stronghold. For the moment, he is playing for time, probably hoping that Israel alone can “finish the job” (de-nuke Iran) somehow without US intervention. There is even some reasonable hope that Iran’s mullah theocracy can be tossed out, at best by the Iranian’s themselves.

Israel is much-resented for beating up on its enemies. It left Gaza for dead after the horrific Oct 7, 2023, rape, murder, and hostage attack. The American Left has labeled Israel “Hitler 2.0” for that. The American Left is insane of course. The news media is working the story hard that Israel is now hated by everybody in the world, even Ol’ Tucker Carlson. The Jewish lawfare ninjas are just layin’ low on this one, which seems a bit churlish for such otherwise combative punks. Only Alan Dershowitz dares speak up for Israel, and he’s not associated with the Left anymore. It remains for Mr. Trump to keep a clear head about this while everybody else runs around with his and her hair on fire.

I will make a bold prediction: Iran will be successfully de-nuked. The world will be better for it. Eventually, world opinion about Israel will shift. The world will be grateful that Israel dared to take on this problem. Eventually, too, the lawfare ninjas will find themselves in court — but, this time, sitting at the defendant’s table on a seditious conspiracy rap. That will toast my bagel.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 16:20

Iran Officials Join Large Anti-Israel Street Protests Dubbed ‘Friday Of Rage & Victory’

Iran Officials Join Large Anti-Israel Street Protests Dubbed ‘Friday Of Rage & Victory’

Despite Israeli warplanes conducting regular bombings and around Tehran, and against nuclear and missile sites in Western Iran, tens of thousands have taken to the streets for what activists are calling “Friday of Rage and Victory” after mosque prayers on Friday morning.

The call to protest is being pushed by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-controlled (IRGC) Fars News, among others. Fars said Iranians should “march to shout for freedom and unity against the oppression and savagery of the Zionists, showing the world that the Iranian nation will not overlook the crimes committed against its land and honor.”

Large crowds have been filmed and photographed in streets of the Iranian capital, and this has even seen some high-ranking Iranian officials join in.

“Among those photographed at the prayer and the march were Chief Justice of Iran Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i, former IRGC commander Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari, as well as several ministers and the deputy speaker of parliament, a social media post by Iran’s Jamaran News showed,” Al Jazeera writes.

RT footage of large crowds in Iranian cities on Friday:

State-run English language Press TV has observed similar pro-military demonstrations have taken place in other major  cities, including Mashhad, Isfahan, Tabriz, Qom, Shiraz, Qazvin, Yazd, and Gilan.

Report: Presence of Major General Jafari, the Chief Justice, the Minister of Roads, the Minister of Industry, Mines and Trade, the Deputy Speaker of Parliament, the Minister of Sports, at the Tehran Anger and Victory March and Friday Prayer.

According to more eyewitness accounts of the growing protests via Al Jazeera:

We’re seeing unprecedentedly large demonstrations here in Tehran and in cities big and small across the country. We’ve seen hundreds of thousands of people taking to the streets and marching in solidarity to express their anger over the Israeli attacks, despite the ongoing strikes.

There were striking scenes at Friday prayers at the University of Tehran. People were chanting, waving flags of Iran, Palestine and Hezbollah. We heard many chants saying they supported Iran’s retaliatory actions.

Some people brought pictures of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who had called for solidarity among the people after the Israeli strikes began.

These Iranian military actions have continued, as the aerial war reaches one week since the last early Friday morning Israeli surprise attacks, which came at a moment Iran was preparing for more nuclear negotiations with Washington.

While President Trump has said he will decide within two weeks whether to join American forces with Israel’s assault on Iran, the Europeans are scrambling to engage the Iranians in hopes of salvaging some kind of nuclear deal. But the clock is ticking, as Iran’s retaliatory missiles are only growing more destructive, and as Israel’s air defenses struggle to keep up and not be overwhelmed. At least twenty more ballistic missiles have been fired on Israel Friday afternoon (local).

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 15:40

NIH Ends Gain-Of-Function Research, Implementing Trump’s Executive Order

NIH Ends Gain-Of-Function Research, Implementing Trump’s Executive Order

Authored by Savannah Hulsey Pointer via The Epoch Times,

The National Institute of Health (NIH) announced the end of gain-of-function research in a June 18 statement. The institute’s update said the move is in compliance with President Donald Trump’s executive order on the topic. 

The president’s order was issued on May 5 of this year to improve the “safety and security of biological research.” 

The agency is also suspending or terminating the awards that have supported this research, as the order requires. The awardees are required to review their research portfolios by June 30 to ensure the projects are terminated.

“NIH is requiring all NIH awardees to review their research portfolios to identify NIH funding and other support for projects meeting the definition of dangerous gain-of-function research,” the June 18 statement said

Trump’s Order 

Trump’s May executive order concludes: “Dangerous gain-of-function research on biological agents and pathogens has the potential to significantly endanger the lives of American citizens.” Additionally, the order allowed for research agencies to find and end federal funding for other biological research that “could pose a threat to American public health, public safety, or national security.”

It also ended federal funding for gain-of-function research in countries of concern, such as China and Iran, and prohibited funding from moving to foreign research that would likely cause another pandemic. 

According to the White House fact sheet, the order was given because “these measures will drastically reduce the potential for lab-related incidents involving gain-of-function research, like that conducted on bat coronaviruses in China by the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

The president’s order paused U.S. research that used infectious pathogens and toxins, citing possible danger to American citizens, until a time when a safer and more transparent plan can be implemented. 

Both COVID-19 and the 1977 Russian flu were used as illustrations of the possible outcome of underregulated research with dangerous pathogens.

House Oversight Report

In December 2024, the Republican-led House Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released a 520-page report that was the end result of a two-year investigation, announcing that its findings indicated the COVID-19 virus likely originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.

The report found that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was funded by the NIH and the EcoHealth Alliance Inc., which used U.S. taxpayer dollars to support the research at the lab. 

The committee said in its report that COVID-19 had biological characteristics not previously found in nature. According to the committee, the data reviewed indicated that all COVID-19 cases could be traced back to a single introduction into humans. This is different than previous pandemics, where there were multiple spillover events discovered.

“By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin, it would have already surfaced,” the oversight subcommittee said in a statement.

The committee findings also cited a June 2023 Office of the Director of National Intelligence report that offered a similar conclusion, and went even further, stating, “Scientists at the WIV have created chimeras, or combinations of SARS-like coronaviruses through genetic engineering, attempted to clone other unrelated viruses, and used reverse genetic cloning techniques on SARS-like coronaviruses.”

During the investigation, the panel interviewed Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who left the role in December 2022. 

According to the committee report, Fauci “prompted” a research study titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” for the purpose of disproving the theory of the pandemic originating via a lab leak. 

“Although Dr. Fauci believed the lab-leak theory to be a conspiracy theory at the start of the pandemic, it now appears that his position is that he does have an open mind about the origin of the virus—so long as it does not implicate EcoHealth Alliance, and by extension himself and NIAID,” it stated, citing Fauci’s memoir that was published weeks after the hearing.

More Changes 

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which governs the NIH and other agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has made other significant changes. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy notified the 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices on June 9 of their dismissal.

The panel was created by the CDC to provide advice about vaccines, including childhood and adult immunization schedules. 

Members “are knowledgeable in the fields of immunization practices and public health, have expertise in the use of vaccines and other immunobiologic agents in clinical practice or preventive medicine, have expertise with clinical or laboratory vaccine research, or have expertise in assessment of vaccine efficacy and safety,” the committee’s charter says.

Kennedy spoke to reporters about the dismissals, saying that the new members would be credentialed scientists and doctors “who are going to do evidence-based medicine, who are going to be objective, and who are going to follow the science and make critical public health determinations for our children based upon the best science.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 15:20

Trump Calls For Special Counsel To Investigate 2020 Election As Texas Launches Separate Inquiry Into 2024

Trump Calls For Special Counsel To Investigate 2020 Election As Texas Launches Separate Inquiry Into 2024

President Donald Trump on Friday called for a special prosecutor to investigate potential fraud in the 2020 US election. 

“Zero Border crossings for the month for TRUMP, verses 60,000 for Sleepy, Crooked Joe Biden, a man who lost the 2020 Presidential Election by a ‘LANDSLIDE!‘” Trump posted to Truth Social.

“Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD! The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin! What this Crooked man, and his CORRUPT CRONIES, have done to our Country in 4 years, is grossly indescribable! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

The post comes on the heels of FBI reports that China allegedly mass-produced fake driver’s licenses in connection with a fake ballot scheme in the 2020 election, Just the News reported. 

Officials told Just the News that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had captured nearly 20,000 fake driver’s licenses in July 2020. Those revelations have called into question the assertions from former FBI Director Christopher Wray that he knew of no foreign interference plots ahead of the election.

They have further reignited Trump’s own claims of large-scale election fraud in 2020 that he has said affected the results.

Meanwhile, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on Wednesday that he’s launching investigations “into 33 noncitizens for illegally voting in the 2024 election.”

“Noncitizens must not be allowed to influence American elections, and I will use the full weight of my office to investigate all voter fraud,” he said in a post on X. 

 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 15:00

IAEA Chief Warns UN Security Council That Strike On Iran’s Bushehr Plant Would Create Nuclear Disaster

IAEA Chief Warns UN Security Council That Strike On Iran’s Bushehr Plant Would Create Nuclear Disaster

Update(1118ET): The head of the UN nuclear watchdog IAEA, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has issued fresh remarks before the Security Council on Friday, warning that Israeli strikes on Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant is where the consequences of an attack could be most serious. The active and operating nuclear power plant currently hosts thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. He warns of potential nuclear disaster:

“Countries of the region have reached out directly to me over the past few hours to express their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and completely clear — in case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity,” Grossi tells the UN Security Council.

More highlights from Grossi’s UN address via Al Jazeera:

  • Countries of the region have reached out directly to me over the past few hours to express their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and completely clear that, in case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment.
  • Similarly, a hit that disables the only two lines supplying electrical power to the plant could cause its reactor core to melt, which could result in a high release of radioactivity to the environment.
  • In their worst case, both scenarios would necessitate protective actions, such as evacuations and sheltering of the population, or the need to take stable iodine with a reach extending to distances from a few to several hundred kilometres. Radiation monitoring would need to cover distances of several hundred kilometres, and food restrictions may need to be implemented.
  • Any action against the Tehran nuclear research reactor could also have severe consequences, potentially for large areas of the city of Tehran and its inhabitants.
  • Armed attack on nuclear facilities should never take place and could result in radioactive releases with great consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the state which has been attacked. I, therefore, again call for maximum restraint.

Oil facilities are still getting hit by Israeli warplanes into Friday:

* * *

A series of headlines, some contradictory, on where things stand with Iran nuclear negotiations with the US, sent oil sliding, then pumping, then extending losses again.

One senior Iranian official told Reuters that Iran is ‘ready’ to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment, while a quick follow-up headline said “zero enrichment will undoubtedly be rejected” by Iran “especially now, under Israel’s strikes.”

The official said “the role of European powers is now more prominent, as Tehran is unwilling to engage with US amid Israeli attacks. After that glimmer of hope offered for negotiations, the clarification that nothing has in fact change, sent oil dropping further Friday morning.

Oil prices declined on Friday but stayed on track for a third straight weekly increase, following the White House’s postponement of a decision regarding US participation in the Israel-Iran conflict:

Brent crude futures were down $2.57, or around 3.3%, to $76.28 a barrel by 1204 GMT but still set to gain nearly 3% on the week.

According to the latest from Bloomberg:

Israel will complete the task of preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons whether or not the US joins the operation, its energy minister said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the only way to end the war is to “unconditionally” stop Israel.

And Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has clarified just before meeting European officials in Geneva related to EU efforts at mediate that “Iran is not prepared for negotiations with anyone while Israel continues its attacks.”

More Friday and overnight headlines…

* * *

Geopolitics: Middle East War

  • Israel will complete the task of preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons whether or not the US joins the operation, its energy minister said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the only way to end the war is to “unconditionally” stop Israel, according to Bloomberg
  • E3/EU-Iran meeting in Geneva expected to occur “this afternoon”, via WSJ’s Norman.
  • Israeli Defence Minister Katz has ordered the military to increase attacks on Iranian regime targets within Tehran.
  • Iran’s Foreign Minister says they will only hold nuclear talks in the E3 meeting.
  • Russia’s Kremlin says dialogue with Ukraine continues expect to agree next week on a date for the next round of talks Ukraine is unpredictable, continue “special military operation”, though would prefer to reach goals by diplomatic needs.

US Involvement

  • The White House said, “message directly from the President – based on the fact that there is a significant chance of negotiations with Iran in the near future – I will make a decision on whether to launch [an attack] in the next two weeks.”
  • US President Trump had been briefed on both the risks and benefits of bombing Fordow and his mindset was that disabling it was necessary due to the risk of weapons being produced in a relatively short period of time, according to CBS.
  • Broadcasting Authority, citing an Israeli source, reported that the US had asked Israel to defer its attack on the Fordow nuclear facility.
  • Kann News reported that there was a “possible attack at Fordow”: according to sources, the US had asked Israel to wait until negotiations with Iran had been exhausted.
  • US President Trump is to attend a National Security Meeting at 11:00 EDT on Friday.
  • US law enforcement officials had stepped up surveillance of Iran-backed operatives in the US, according to CBS sources.
  • The White House said Iran was able to produce a nuclear bomb within “a couple of weeks”.
  • A White House official told Fox’s Heinrich that the US military had no doubt about the efficacy of bunker busters in eliminating the site at Fordow, and also denied that any options—including tactical nuclear weapons—had been taken off the table.
  • The White House Press Secretary said there were no signs that China was getting involved militarily in Iran, according to Reuters.
  • The US reportedly believed Iran would build a nuclear bomb if Supreme Leader Khamenei were assassinated and the Fordow facility was attacked, according to The New York Times.

Strikes

  • There were reports of Israeli strikes in the Lavizan area of Tehran, where Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei was reportedly hiding in a bunker, according to i24 journalist Stein.
  • An Israeli military spokesman said Israel had attacked the special forces headquarters of the internal security apparatus in Tehran within the last 24 hours, according to Reuters.
  • Journalist Horowitz said on X that opposition sources were circulating “unconfirmed” reports claiming that the head of Iran’s military, Abdolrahim Mousavi, had been killed in an Israeli strike.
  • The Fars News Agency said Iran had used a new generation of precision missiles in its attack on Israel on Thursday morning, according to Fars.
  • The Norwegian Foreign Ministry said an explosion had occurred on Thursday evening in Tel Aviv at the residence of the Norwegian ambassador to Israel, according to Reuters.
  • The Jordanian army said an explosives-laden drone had fallen in the Azraq area after it “fell short of its range,” according to Al Hadath.
  • Iranian media reported that air defences were activated in Isfahan, according to Al Arabiya.

Diplomacy

  • Britain, France, and Germany are to hold talks with Iran’s Foreign Minister on Friday in a last-ditch effort to avert an escalation of conflict in the Middle East and a possible US intervention, according to FT.
  • Iran’s Foreign Minister had reached out to European foreign ministers, requesting a meeting with them on Friday, Jerusalem Post reported.
  • Trump administration officials are pitching the president’s two-week timeline as an opportunity to allow diplomacy to play out. Special Envoy Witkoff and Iran’s Foreign Minister Araghchi had been in communication in recent days, though there were no plans for the two to meet yet, according to ABC.
  • Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East Witkoff will not attend the UK/France/Germany talks with Iran in Geneva on Friday, according to White House officials cited by NBC.
  • An Iranian source denied reports of a phone call between Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi and US presidential envoy Witkoff following Israel’s aggression, according to Iran Nuances.
  • The White House Press Secretary said they would see how the EU meeting with the Iranians went tomorrow, according to Reuters.
  • US officials said no date had been set for a meeting between US and Iranian officials yet, according to Axios.

US Military and Deployment

  • Over the next 10 to 14 days, there were expected to be two aircraft carriers in the Middle East and a third operating in the Mediterranean Sea, according to ABC.

Iranian Actions

  • A senior IRGC official said that before the Israeli airstrikes, all enriched uranium had been transferred from the nuclear sites to secret hiding locations, according to i24 journalist Stein.
  • Iran’s Tasnim News Agency, quoting an Iranian official, said intelligence had thwarted a major Israeli plot against Iranian Foreign Minister Araqchi in Tehran, according to Sky News Arabia.
  • Iraq’s Hezbollah threatened to target US bases and close the Strait of Hormuz if Washington joined strikes on Iran, according to Al Hadath.
  • An Israeli official said Iran could likely sustain the current rate of missile fire at Israel for up to five months, provided their missile launchers were not destroyed, according to NBC.
  • Israel anticipated attacks from Iran’s proxies across the Middle East, according to Israel Channel 14.
  • An Israeli intelligence official said the imminent collapse of the Iranian regime was far from the truth, according to NBC.

Geopolitics: Other

  • A Japanese destroyer sailed through the Taiwan Strait after a Chinese jet approached it, according to Nikkei.
  • China President Xi met with New Zealand PM Luxon in Beijing, according to CCTV.

Don’t buy your meat from a multinational… 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 14:55

Is The Dollar’s Death Greatly Exaggerated?

Is The Dollar’s Death Greatly Exaggerated?

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

The narrative surrounding the “dollar’s death” as the world’s reserve currency has been on the rise recently. However, this happens whenever the dollar declines relative to other currencies. We previously wrote about the false claims of the “dollar’s death” in 2023 (see here, here, and here). The recent decline in the dollar relative to other currencies is well within historical norms. Notably, previous declines were much larger without the “fear-mongering” from the “experts of doom.”

The “dollar’s death” frequently appears in financial discussions. Of course, that is often when geopolitical tensions, economic disruption, or market fluctuations are on the rise. Yes, there are valid concerns about the U.S. dollar’s long-term dominance. However, the notion that the dollar’s death is imminent, leading to a catastrophic economic collapse, is vastly overstated. The dollar remains the cornerstone of global finance due to structural, economic, and geopolitical factors unlikely to shift abruptly. Below, I outline five reasons why the dollar’s death narrative is exaggerated.

Five Reasons the Dollar’s Death Narrative Is Overstated

  1. Lack of a Viable Alternative Currency – The dollar’s reserve status persists because no credible rival exists. The euro, holding 20% of global reserves compared to the dollar’s ~58% (IMF, Q2 2024), is constrained by the eurozone’s fragmented bond markets and political volatility. Despite increasing use (2–3% of reserves), China’s renminbi is limited by capital controls and restricted convertibility, rendering it unfit for global reserve status. Other currencies, such as the Japanese yen (6%) or smaller ones like the Canadian or Australian dollar, lack the economic scale or liquidity to challenge the dollar. Without a currency matching the dollar’s deep, liquid markets and global trust, the dollar’s death remains improbable in the near term.

  2. Strength of the U.S. Economy – The U.S. economy, accounting for 26% of global GDP, anchors the dollar’s dominance. Its large, dynamic economy, supported by the rule of law and robust capital markets, positions the dollar as a haven, particularly during global instability. While critics highlight rising U.S. debt ($35 trillion, ~120% of GDP), the dollar’s reserve status enables borrowing at lower rates, sustaining deficits without immediate crisis. Compared to other economies—Japan’s slow growth, China’s restricted markets, or Europe’s fragmentation—the U.S. offers stability, making the dollar’s death unlikely in the foreseeable future.

  3. Network Effects and Global Financial Inertia – Network effects perpetuate the dollar’s dominance: its widespread use enhances its value. It constitutes ~88% of global foreign exchange transactions (SWIFT data) and ~60% of international debt and trade invoicing. Transitioning to another currency would demand extensive coordination among central banks, governments, and markets, incurring significant costs and risks. Historical currency transitions, such as from the pound to the dollar, spanned decades and required major geopolitical shifts, which are absent today. This inertia renders the dollar’s death a distant prospect.

  4. Limited Scope of De-Dollarization Efforts – Although countries like China, Russia, and BRICS nations advocate for trade in local currencies (e.g., China’s renminbi in 56% of its bilateral trade), these efforts have limited global impact. The dollar’s share of reserves has dipped gradually (from 67% to 58% over two decades). However, this reflects diversification, not the dollar’s death, often into allied currencies like the Canadian or Australian dollar. China holds ~$2 trillion in dollar-denominated assets, underscoring its reliance. Geopolitical moves, such as Russia’s shift to gold or renminbi, are constrained by the small scale of non-dollar systems (e.g., China’s CIPS vs. SWIFT). These fragmented efforts fall short of triggering the dollar’s death.

  5. Resilience Amid Policy Challenges – Critics argue that U.S. policies—like tariffs, sanctions, or Federal Reserve actions—undermine confidence in the dollar. For instance, Trump’s tariffs in 2025 caused a ~9% dollar decline, fueling dollar death fears. However, economists note such fluctuations are cyclical, not structural, with the dollar still robust compared to its 2011–2022 peak (up ~40% against a currency basket). Sanctions, such as those on Russia in 2022, have not significantly reduced global dollar holdings, as most reserve currencies are held by U.S. allies who joined sanctions. The Federal Reserve’s swap lines and liquidity support further reinforce the dollar’s role in crises.

As shown, the dollar dominates the composition of global currency transactions.

However, there is a reason that the recent dollar decline could be nearing its end.

Why The Dollar Could Rally Strongly

This isn’t the first time the “dollar’s death” has made the news. In 2022, “de-dollarization” narratives filled the bearish narratives, with everyone saying the dollar’s death was imminent. Yet, that “frenzy of doom” marked the bottom of the dollar before a robust rally. We could be setting up for another similar rally for two reasons.

First, from the technical perspective, the dollar selloff has become rather extreme. Using weekly data, the dollar is now oversold on a momentum basis as it was in early 2021 and late 2018. These previous oversold conditions set the dollar up for a strong counter-trend rally.

Furthermore, everyone from the “shoe-shine boy to the street corner vendor” is shorting the dollar. According to BofA’s fund manager survey, the short position against the US Dollar is at the highest level in 20 years. As such, any reversal in the dollar could be substantial if those “shorts” are forced to reverse their positions.

The question is, what must change for a dollar price reversal currently? That brings us to the second reason the dollar could rally: the ECB’s rate cuts.

As the reserve currency, foreign sovereign nations hold reserves in U.S. dollars to facilitate trade. If the dollar is too weak or strong relative to another currency, it can negatively impact that nation’s economy. Therefore, when the dollar drifts too far from another currency, that country can intervene to stabilize its currency. That intervention is achieved by increasing or decreasing U.S. dollar reserves. It can do this by buying or selling U.S. Treasuries, gold, or other dollar-denominated assets. In the majority of cases, it is either U.S. treasuries or gold.

The ECB has been aggressively cutting rates, eight times in this recent cycle, while the U.S. Federal Reserve remains on hold. The result is a divergence that is developing between U.S. Treasury bond yields and, for example, the German Bund.

There are three primary reasons this is crucial for investors to understand.

  1. Higher Yields Attract Capital Inflows – Historically, rising U.S. Treasury yields draw foreign investment due to higher returns compared to other major economies’ bonds. For instance, 10-year Treasury yields surged from 3.65% in September 2024 to 4.8% by early 2025. However, European bond yields (e.g., German 10-year Bunds) remain lower due to ECB easing. This yield differential incentivizes foreign investors, including central banks and institutional investors, to buy Treasuries. That buying increases dollar demand and supports appreciation.

  2. Treasuries as a Preferred Store of Foreign Reserves – As noted above, U.S. Treasuries are the backbone of global foreign exchange reserves. Higher yields offer reserve managers better returns without sacrificing safety, unlike riskier assets like equities or emerging market bonds. For example, foreign demand for Treasuries has remained stable despite ECB rate cuts. This sustained demand supports the dollar, as central banks must buy dollars to purchase Treasuries, reinforcing its status as a reserve currency.

  3. Dollar Appreciation Driven by Yield Differentials – The divergence in monetary policy—ECB’s dovish stance versus the Fed’s pause after 100 basis points of cuts in late 2024—has widened the interest rate gap, favoring the dollar. Higher U.S. yields, particularly on 10-year Treasuries (4.4–4.8% in early 2025), contrast with lower European yields, which could drive capital flows to the U.S. The demand for yield aligns with historical patterns where higher U.S. rates bolster the DXY, as seen during the 2016 post-election period when fiscal optimism pushed yields and the dollar higher. Despite tariff-related volatility, the dollar’s recent appreciation suggests that yield differentials are a key support.

The critical point is that this would be an attractive set-up for sovereign governments, wealth funds, and foreign investors. As foreign inflows are initially used to capture higher bond yields, investors also receive a double benefit of currency gains and higher bond prices (lower yields).

However, the dollar’s death narrative persists due to recent decoupling trends. Yields rose as the dollar weakened in early 2025, driven by fiscal concerns and tariff uncertainty. These recent concerns will pass, but the dollar’s role as a reserve currency for world trade will not.

Addressing the Dollar’s Death Narrative and Economic Implications

The dollar’s death narrative often arises from concerns about U.S. debt, inflation, tariffs, or the geopolitical use as a weapon of the dollar (e.g., sanctions). These risks exist, but overstate their near-term impact. Losing reserve status could elevate U.S. borrowing costs, drive inflation through pricier imports, and diminish geopolitical influence. Still, the U.S. economy’s scale, military strength, and institutional stability make the dollar’s death improbable without a seismic global event (e.g., the loss of a major war as witnessed in the Weimar Republic). Despite a gradual decline, the dollar would likely remain a leading currency alongside others and would not vanish entirely.

This narrative is often amplified on platforms and media outlets that depend on “bearish narratives” to get clicks and views. While some posts exaggerate the “dollar’s death” to promote alternatives like gold or cryptocurrencies, these narratives are often misleading. Economists like Barry Eichengreen and Morgan Stanley’s James Lord contend that the dollar’s death is “greatly exaggerated,” citing its entrenched role and the absence of viable alternatives, as discussed above. Sure, the U.S. economy could face challenges from a weaker dollar, but a devastating collapse is unlikely due to its adaptability and global financial integration.

Most notably, as discussed in “Narratives Change, Markets Don’t,” it is essential to look past narratives to avoid the emotional biases that impact our investing outcomes. To wit:

“The need for a narrative is deeply rooted in our psychology. As pattern-seeking creatures, we crave coherence and predictability. Chaos triggers anxiety. It feels dangerous, uncontrollable, and unsettling. In investing, this anxiety is magnified by the direct impact on our wealth and financial security. We regain a semblance of control by latching onto the narrative, no matter how tenuous. The narrative tells us why things are happening and what might happen next, which soothes our natural fear of uncertainty.”

Humans are hardwired to prioritize negative information over optimistic information. From an evolutionary perspective, this bias was essential. Our ancestors learned to recognize threats (like predators) to survive. 

This instinct, known as “negativity bias,” influences how we process information, including financial news and market narratives. Such is why “bearish” leaning podcasts and articles generate the most clicks and views.

  • Fear Is a Stronger Motivator Than Greed – While the hope of making money drives investors, the fear of losing money is more powerful.

  • Bearish Narratives Seem More “Rational” – Pessimism often feels safer and more cautious. During volatile markets, a bearish forecast can sound more analytical and responsible.

  • Media Amplifies Negative Headlines – News outlets know that fear sells. Sensational headlines like “MARKETS IN TURMOIL” or “CRASH COMING?” generate clicks and engagement.

  • Herd Behavior and Echo Chambers – Investors flock to bearish opinions for validation when markets are shaky. If others are cautious or fearful, this reinforces the idea that a downturn is imminent. This is the case even if the underlying fundamentals remain sound. Social media and financial news create echo chambers that amplify these fears.

Most importantly to investors, the market absorbs all negative media narratives over the long term. The recent barrage of narratives surrounding debts, deficits, tariffs, and the “dollar’s death” feeds your negative bias. However, zooming out, investors who have stayed away from investing in the financial markets to “avoid the loss” of potential adverse outcomes have paid a dear price in reduced financial wealth.

In other words, there is always a “reason” not to invest. However, the current narrative will change, but the market won’t. 

*  *  *

For more in-depth analysis and actionable investment strategies, visit RealInvestmentAdvice.com. Stay ahead of the markets with expert insights tailored to help you achieve your financial goals.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 13:20

USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group Will Arrive In Mideast Waters This Weekend

USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group Will Arrive In Mideast Waters This Weekend

The USS Nimitz carrier strike group is en route to Middle East waters and is expected to arrive this weekend, a US official tells Fox news on Friday, after the carrier departed the South China Sea on Monday.

This is the latest confirmation that the US Navy will now have two aircraft carriers in the Middle East at the same time. While reports previewed this movement earlier this week, making it no surprise, this is the first revelation of a more precise timeline.

Stratfor 

As for the prior reporting via military sources, Stars & Stripes stated, “The aircraft carrier and its strike group left Bremerton, Wash., in March for the Indo-Pacific region for what is expected to be the ship’s final deployment. Now, the Nimitz and the warships sailing with it will join the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson in the Middle East, the defense official said.

Currently, the USS Carl Vinson is already positioned in the Arabian Sea, while the Navy has also lately confirmed deployment of the carrier USS Gerald R. Ford to the Mediterranean, presumably as ‘back-up’ – though that mission had long been shechuled.

As for the Nimitz, its is currently underway westbound from the Strait of Malacca. So this will place in total three carriers within reach of the Middle East theatre of operations.

Stars & Stripes has recently offered the following background on the last week of the Iran-Israel aerial war:

Each carrier strike group typically brings with it one attack submarine, one cruiser and two or more destroyers, in addition to an air wing of F/A-18 Super Hornets and (on some carriers) F-35 Lightning strike fighters. The overall package delivers a powerful land-attack punch, but also enhances regional air defense with a combination of anti-aircraft, anti-drone and anti-ballistic-missile capabilities. 

Two destroyers operating in Central Command have already been involved in defeating Iranian ballistic missile attacks on Israel over the past week, a Navy official told Norfolk’s WAVY. USS The Sullivans and USS Arleigh Burke both expended interceptors over the weekend to shoot down Iranian attacks, the official confirmed. 

Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class George J. Penney III.

President Trump conveyed via the White House Press Secretary on Thursday afternoon that he will make a decision on striking Iran within the next two weeks.

Trump words and ‘warning’ to Tehran were as follows: “Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/20/2025 – 13:00