70.9 F
Chicago
Thursday, October 8, 2026
type here...
Home Blog Page 151

U.S. Drafts Ultimatum for Allies Joining China’s AI Bloc

survivalnomics
-
0
U.S. Drafts Ultimatum for Allies Joining China’s AI Bloc

The United States is preparing to tell 35 countries they cannot belong to both the American and Chinese artificial intelligence coalitions, and that joining Beijing’s framework will cost them their place in Washington’s, according to an undated State Department draft letter reviewed by Reuters and a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The letter is addressed to the signatories of an “AI Opportunity Statement” the United States circulated in June, a group that includes members of Pax Silica, the non-binding framework Washington launched last year to secure supply chains for critical minerals, semiconductors and AI models, Reuters reported.

“To be part of everything is to be part of nothing. Signature of the Pax Silica Declaration is not merely a membership subscription, but a commitment.”

The letter urges signatories to choose deliberately and does not name China. The U.S. official said the document was drafted to make clear that countries “can’t have it both ways,” speaking on condition of anonymity because internal discussions are continuing.

The letter has not been sent. Reuters reported it could not determine when the State Department intends to deliver it, or whether the wording will be revised first, and said the draft carried no date. The department declined to comment on what it called “purportedly leaked internal documents.”

Kazakhstan was likely the trigger – as the only country known to have joined both frameworks. Reuters described it as a potentially important source of the critical minerals the American strategy is built to secure.

Xi Jinping launched the rival World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization in July, promoting Chinese open-weight models – systems whose weights can be downloaded, modified and run on local hardware – as a challenge to U.S. influence over the sector.

China’s embassy in Washington said Beijing opposes politicizing trade and technology, and that such moves “will only stifle global AI advances and serve no one’s interests.” The Kazakh embassy did not respond to a request for comment.

Roughly two dozen countries have joined Pax Silica, among them Japan, Australia and South Korea. The framework pushes signatories toward joint projects and coordinated export controls and away from depending on adversaries for AI inputs. Membership is non-binding.

Chinese open-weight models have closed much of the gap with the proprietary systems built by U.S. firms including OpenAI and Anthropic, a shift that has given Beijing’s coalition more to offer than it had a year ago.

China has used the renewed tariff fight to demonstrate the leverage of its dominance in critical mineral processing, and Washington has moved to secure alternative domestic and allied supplies.

Pax Silica has announced accessions individually and has never published a full roster. The identities of most of the 35 countries being asked to choose are not publicly known.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/17/2026 – 04:15

Qatar Denies Holding Iranian Pilots As Tehran Demands Answers Over Missing Airmen

survivalnomics
-
0
Qatar Denies Holding Iranian Pilots As Tehran Demands Answers Over Missing Airmen

Via The Cradle

Qatar has denied that it is holding three Iranian pilots who Iran says were captured alive after their fighter jets crashed during the US-Israeli war on the Islamic Republic.

On Saturday, Mohammad Bagherzadeh, head of the Missing Persons Search Committee of Iran’s Armed Forces General Staff, stated that “Three Iranian pilots were captured alive by Qatari forces after the Su-24 fighter jets crashed during the March attacks.” He identified the captured pilots as Javad Salehi, Abdolmajid Dashtian, and Omran Behraveshian.

via Associated Press

Iran is urging the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to investigate the condition of the pilots. In a statement to the ICRC, Bagherzadeh said that the pilots “have been held by Qatari forces for six months” and have not been allowed to contact their families.

Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari denied the claims, saying Qatar is not holding any Iranian pilots.

“We categorically deny the claims circulating regarding the detention of Iranian pilots,” Ansari said in a statement posted on X. Iranian officials were making “misleading statements” at a sensitive moment for regional diplomacy, he added.

Doha acknowledged shooting down two Iranian Su-24 fighter planes in March as they attacked the Al-Udeid Air Base, the largest US military base in West Asia and home to US Central Command (CENTCOM) personnel.

Qatar said its search and rescue teams located the body of one Iranian pilot, Majid Kazemi, following the incident and had coordinated with Iranian authorities to return the body, in accordance with international humanitarian law.

Qatar added that it had invited Iranian officials to visit the country to obtain details of the search-and-rescue operation, while claiming Iran had not yet responded to the invitation.

Amid the dispute, Qatar says it remains actively engaged as a mediator between the US and Iran and is pushing for a negotiated settlement to the war.

Negotiations are at a standstill, with Iran insisting the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the US agrees to its terms. Meanwhile, the US Navy is continuing its blockade on Iranian ports.

“After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated, pretty soon I’ll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States,” Trump hyperbolically claimed on Friday. “Essentially, that’s what it is. We have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to.”

Tehran rejected the remarks on Saturday. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated that the strategic waterway “cannot be seized with a tweet, nor with an aircraft carrier.” He warned that Iran would continue to enforce its closure of Hormuz until Washington accepts “the reality of defeat.”

Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, through which one-fifth of global oil and gas exports normally travel, in response to the unprovoked US-Israeli attack on the country in February.

Iran’s closure of the strait caused a global energy supply shock that drove up gas prices, exacerbated inflation, and raised alarms about oil reserves across the world.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/17/2026 – 03:30

Israel Threatens Return Of Lebanon War After Unleashing Deadliest Airstrikes Since Ceasefire

survivalnomics
-
0
Israel Threatens Return Of Lebanon War After Unleashing Deadliest Airstrikes Since Ceasefire

Despite a June ceasefire technically being in effect, new weekend Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon mark the deadliest escalation since fighting largely came to a halt earlier this year.

The Saturday attack saw eleven Lebanese killed – among them three children – and 19 injured after Israeli warplanes bombed several areas. It’s by far the biggest mass casualty event since the ceasefire took effect, also in terms of extent of destruction.

Flattened neighborhood in the southern Lebanese village of Deir al-Zahrani on August 15, via AFP

“Israeli warplanes bombed a home on the outskirts of the village of Ansar, killing seven people and flattening the building early on Saturday morning, The Guardian reported. “Rescue services were working at the site to try to find survivors and locate bodies.”

“Another airstrike hours later on a home in the town of Deir al-Zahrani killed two, wounded nine and covered the streets in rubble and smoke,” the report continued to detail. “An Israeli drone also targeted a motorcycle in the nearby city of Nabatieh, but it was unclear if the driver was killed.”

Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA) wrote of the fresh escalation wrote, “The Israeli enemy committed a massacre in the southern town of Ansar at dawn today, resulting in seven martyrs and three wounded.”

Houses and structures across various villages were reported flattened. Israel may have been acting related to reported Hezbollah attacks on IDF troops early Saturday in which which three soldiers were wounded. It was said to be the result of an explosive drone sent from Lebanon.

Israel is threatening to ramp up its operations in Lebanon once again, with Defense Minister Israel Katz saying Sunday morning post on X: “No score on any front will remain unsettled.” He added: “We will forcefully defend our soldiers and citizens.”

According to more from Israel’s side of the narrative:

The Israeli military spokesperson, Ella Waweya, said Israel had attacked “Hezbollah infrastructure” in the Ansar and Nabatieh area in response to the group’s fighters attacking soldiers in the Ali Taher area.

…On Sunday, the Israel Defense Forces said it had killed a senior Hezbollah commander in an airstrike in the southern Lebanon town of Deir al-Zahrani the previous day. It said the Saturday morning strike on Ali Muhammad Fakhr al-Din came in response to a Hezbollah explosive drone attack in the predawn hours Saturday that seriously wounded three soldiers.

Lebanese media reported that the Deir al-Zahrani strike on Saturday morning killed two people.

Aftermath of Israeli attack on the southern Lebanese town of Deir al-Zahrani:

And additionally there was a rare Saturday statement (on the Jewish Sabbath) from Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office: it said “Hezbollah violated the ceasefire in Lebanon by attacking our soldiers in the security zone, which protects Israeli communities just across the border.”

“The IDF responded by striking the Hezbollah terror headquarters which ordered the attack,” the PM’s office said. “Only later did the IDF learn that Hezbollah deliberately put civilians in that military compound,” the statement added.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/17/2026 – 02:45

English Villages In Fear Over 1,200 Male Migrants Moved Next To Schools

survivalnomics
-
0
English Villages In Fear Over 1,200 Male Migrants Moved Next To Schools

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

England’s most peaceful villages are once again being turned into the front line of the migrant crisis.

Up to 1,200 single adult male asylum seekers are earmarked for former military sites sitting within a mile of primary schools, nurseries and children’s play areas, in direct tension with the Home Office’s own recent guidance against housing near sensitive locations.

The plan, revived and pressed forward under the current government, would drop large numbers of young men into high-trust, low-density rural communities that could not be more culturally distant from the backgrounds of many arrivals. The effect is to create maximum demographic shock and local fury in places least equipped to absorb it.

Villagers across North Yorkshire, Suffolk and Oxfordshire are now up in arms as the Home Office continues with three former military bases. RAF Linton-on-Ouse near York is set for as many as 1,200 male asylum seekers. The village itself has only around 600 residents. The result would be a ratio of six migrant men to every local woman. The site sits right in the heart of the community, adjacent to the primary school, a nursery and a children’s play area.

North Yorkshire councillor Malcolm Taylor put it plainly: “It’s quite an attractive site, it’s not one of your austere former military sites and it’s right in the heart of the village. So as a consequence, it’s right adjacent to the school, the play park. That’s what has really ramped up the concerns of the community.”

This is the same Linton-on-Ouse that previously defeated similar plans in 2022. The numbers and the location have not become any more suitable. The base is isolated, with limited buses, strained water, sewage and electricity capacity, and no real village infrastructure to support a sudden influx of that scale.

In west Suffolk, RAF Barnham near Thetford faces proposals for up to 1,250 asylum seekers. Barnham School sits close enough that parents are already discussing withdrawing children, a move that could threaten the school’s future. Parish council chairman John Bauer has highlighted the risk.

A third site near the tiny Oxfordshire village of Piddington, beside the former MoD depot at Bicester, sits next to a children’s play area. That community of roughly 350-400 people has already staged a symbolic referendum in which 96 per cent voted to leave the UK rather than accept up to 1,250 single adult male asylum seekers.

Children wrote pleading letters. Residents described being driven into a corner with no consultation and no serious infrastructure assessment.

Quiet, traditional villages with minimal services and high social trust are repeatedly selected for the densest concentrations of single young men who arrived illegally. These are places where residents still walk at night without fear and where children play freely. They are precisely the environments most alien to the cultural norms of many of the men being housed there.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has framed the policy as a matter of fairness. “We cannot have a situation where it’s only the poorest communities in the country that receive all of the dispersal of refugees and asylum seekers. I do believe all parts of the country need to work, to play their part.”

Borders minister Anna Turley has insisted the men “are not going to be in the village” and that “everything they need will be on that site.” Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said no final decision has been taken and that factors including schools “are taken into account.”

Yet the placements continue to target the same type of community. In the Welsh seaside village of Gronant, population around 1,600, 13 of 15 new-build homes on the site of a former village hall were allocated to asylum seekers without local warning.

Residents only discovered the plan after blacked-out minibuses arrived at night and bunk beds were delivered. One local called it “pure betrayal.” Another said “nobody was told about the arrivals.”

The same dynamic has played out elsewhere: sudden concentrations of single men near schools and play areas, limited local policing, inadequate utilities, and top-down decisions that bypass ordinary planning scrutiny.

For the Bicester and Barnham sites the government is using an urgent national-interest route that sends applications straight to the Housing Secretary, sidestepping local authorities.

Reform’s Zia Yusuf captured the raw numbers: “Andy Burnham is about to dump 1200 unvetted adult male illegal migrants on a tiny village, resulting in locals putting up with a ratio of SIX MEN TO EVERY WOMAN… Burnham is directly endangering British women and girls.”

The consistent choice of the most tranquil, most English villages for the largest groups of single male arrivals produces the maximum cultural collision. These communities did not ask for the crisis, did not vote for open borders, and possess none of the infrastructure or social capital to absorb such a rapid demographic change without friction.

Placing the men there guarantees uproar. It is difficult to see the repeated selection of these locations as accidental.

Local MPs across parties have called the sites inappropriate. Residents are organising. The Home Office continues to insist the moves reduce hotel costs and spread the burden more fairly. What it actually spreads is the sense that ordinary British villages exist primarily as overflow capacity for a system that still fails to stop the boats or remove those with no right to remain.

The villages are not the problem. The policy that treats their way of life as disposable is.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/17/2026 – 02:00

Fog Of War: A World Searching For An Exit

survivalnomics
-
0
Fog Of War: A World Searching For An Exit

Authored by Armstrong Williams via The Epoch Times,

There are moments when the world seems to be moving toward peace and war simultaneously.

This is one of them.

President Donald Trump continues to express hope that the conflict with Iran can be brought to an end. Iran and Oman say negotiations over shipping arrangements in the Strait of Hormuz are progressing.

That is encouraging, but the moment remains fragile.

Iran has attached significant conditions to reopening the strait, including compensation for wartime damage and changes in American policy. So diplomats are discussing stabilizing one of the world’s most important waterways while Tehran continues making demands Washington may find impossible to accept.

That is the fog of war: hope in one headline, escalation in the next.

The contradiction extends to Yemen. Even as diplomacy continues, Iran-aligned Houthi forces remain capable of destabilizing the region, including threatening Saudi interests and shipping routes.

One spark can touch several alliances.

That is why progress must be measured by actions, not announcements. Diplomats negotiate while generals prepare contingencies. Political leaders speak of peace while military planners prepare for negotiations to fail.

America must do the same.

But Washington can no longer ignore another reality: Modern warfare consumes sophisticated weapons at astonishing speed.

Recent reporting has raised serious questions about American inventories of Patriot and THAAD missile-defense interceptors, Tomahawk cruise missiles, and other precision weapons after months of conflict.

The United States remains the most powerful military nation on Earth. But even the strongest military cannot consume advanced weapons indefinitely without confronting production times, supply chains, industrial capacity, and cost.

That is not an argument for weakness. It is an argument for strategic discipline.

Strength means possessing the ability to wage war while understanding which wars are necessary, what objectives justify them, and when diplomacy better serves the national interest.

Europe faces a different danger.

Lithuania and other countries along NATO’s eastern flank increasingly worry that Russia could test the alliance through something deliberately ambiguous such as a drone incident, cyberattack, infrastructure sabotage, false-flag operation, or limited provocation.

The objective might not be territorial conquest.

It might simply be to ask one dangerous question: Will NATO really defend every inch of NATO?

The greatest danger is miscalculation. History reminds us that wars are not always deliberately chosen. Sometimes nations stumble into them because each side assumes the other will retreat.

Then there is migration.

Recent events in Ceuta, Spain’s small territory in North Africa, demonstrate how quickly economic desperation, political instability, and misinformation can overwhelm borders.

Not every national security crisis begins with missiles.

Europe has every right and responsibility to control its borders. But border security and human dignity cannot become opposing principles. A civilized society must be capable of defending both.

Another transformation receives too little attention: the democratization of warfare.

Ukraine demonstrated how inexpensive drones can destroy equipment worth millions of dollars, conduct surveillance, and fundamentally alter battlefield tactics.

Now those technologies are spreading.

Colombian authorities have confronted armed groups using or experimenting with weaponized civilian drones. The lesson should concern every government: Technology perfected on one battlefield does not remain there. It migrates.

Today’s battlefield innovation can become tomorrow’s terrorist, cartel, or homeland security threat.

Yet amid this instability, Venezuela reminds us that political change does not always require warfare.

Opposition leaders continue demanding restored democratic institutions, political freedoms, and credible elections. Dialogue matters, but dialogue without genuine political competition is insufficient.

Eventually democracy comes down to something remarkably simple: Let the people choose.

What connects Iran, Yemen, Russia, Europe, Colombia, and Venezuela is neither geography nor ideology. It is uncertainty.

We are living through a period in which the international order is being tested from multiple directions. Alliances are under pressure. Military inventories are being strained. Drones are transforming warfare. Migration challenges borders. Governments struggle with legitimacy while regional conflicts threaten to widen.

And yet diplomacy continues. That matters.

Oman is still mediating. Washington is still searching for an exit from conflict. Governments capable of exchanging missiles remain capable of exchanging messages.

We should never confuse optimism with naivete. A ceasefire is not peace. Negotiations are not reconciliation. Progress announced today does not guarantee tranquility tomorrow.

But cynicism cannot become foreign policy either. Peace almost always begins while distrust still exists.

The question is whether leaders are negotiating because they genuinely seek an end to conflict or because they need time to prepare for its next phase.

That is why I remain hopeful but clear-eyed.

Political leaders make the announcements. Ordinary people live with the consequences.

Families bury the dead. Soldiers carry the wounds. Refugees leave their homes. Businesses absorb the costs. Parents wonder whether their children will inherit another war.

Through this fog, our objectives must remain clear: Strength without recklessness. Diplomacy without naivete. Deterrence without endless warfare. Hope without illusion.

Because peace is not what governments announce today. Peace is what survives tomorrow.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/16/2026 – 23:20

“I’ve Never Heard Anything Like It”: Was America’s Top Secret Stealth Bomber Just Spotted Over Kansas?

survivalnomics
-
0
“I’ve Never Heard Anything Like It”: Was America’s Top Secret Stealth Bomber Just Spotted Over Kansas?

A video of a mysterious aircraft thundering over a U.S. military installation has set off a wave of speculation online, and the leading theories all point to aircraft the Pentagon would rather nobody photographed.

The aircraft was captured flying over McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kansas. It is believed to be the B-21 Raider, a nuclear-capable stealth bomber carrying a unit price tag of roughly $700 million.

That identification is unconfirmed. OutKick’s David Hookstead, who first published the footage, wrote that a reflection off what appears to be a cockpit window around the seven-second mark is the strongest evidence for the B-21 – but allowed it could also be the RQ-170 Sentinel or the RQ-180, a classified surveillance drone whose existence the government has never acknowledged. Other observers have argued the shape is a better match for the older B-2 Spirit.

McConnell is a tanker base, home to the KC-46 Pegasus, and sits well outside the B-21’s Edwards Air Force Base test corridor – which is part of why the sighting drew attention, and part of why some doubt the identification.

Witnesses on the ground said they felt the aircraft before they ever saw it.

“I never saw it, but I could hear it. It was shaking the ground! I’ve never heard anything like it,” one X user wrote.

Northrop Grumman landed the contract to build the bomber in 2015 and the U.S. Air Force expects the Raider to enter operational service in the coming years. The first aircraft is slated to arrive at Ellsworth Air Force Base in 2027.

The Pentagon has signaled it wants at least 100 of the bombers, flying alongside a fleet of 76 modernized B-52 Stratofortresses. However, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has made clear the Pentagon may need far more firepower than that.

“We have to invest in more capabilities to include the B-21, which is ahead of schedule,” Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee in April. “We believe we will require a lot more – over 100 – in the future.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/16/2026 – 22:45

Dallas Airport Shelves Muslim Washing Facilities After Texas Governor Threatens Airport Funding

survivalnomics
-
0
Dallas Airport Shelves Muslim Washing Facilities After Texas Governor Threatens Airport Funding

Authored by Jeremy Lott via The Epoch Times,

The Dallas Fort Worth (DFW) International Airport was mulling the installation of special washing rooms to facilitate prayers by its Muslim passengers. A DFW spokesman told The Epoch Times Saturday that the airport has shelved those plans after objections by the governor of Texas.

The airport was “in the process of evaluating an internal proposal to add a set of ablution washing stations on the pre-security side of Terminal D” for international passengers, the spokesperson wrote in a statement.

Terminal D is one of five terminals at DFW. The terminal has more than 30 gates, out of what the airport lists as over 160 total gates. It also has a connected hotel, the Grand Hyatt.

With every proposed project in the whole airport, DFW management considers several factors, including “operational benefits, customer service impacts, operational risks and costs,” before granting approval, the spokesperson said.

The prayer washing project had not yet reached the official evaluation point when Texas Gov. Greg Abbott registered his opposition to such facilities.

“Government-owned airports cannot favor one religion over all others,” Abbott wrote on his X account Friday, and thus the airport’s “plans to install Islamic wudu washing facilities” were “illegal.”

The governor announced that he had taken action so his state would “not allow illegal religious discrimination at taxpayer-funded facilities.” He directed a review of all state grants to both DFW and an airport in Houston “for possible revocation” and also referred the issue to the Department of Transportation for its own investigation.

Abbott also included links to letters that he had sent to Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy and DFW’s CEO Christopher McLaughlin. He copied U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche on the Duffy letter, and the mayors of Dallas, Fort Worth, and Houston on his letter to the DFW.

DFW then “accelerated its review due to elevated public interest this week,” the spokesperson said. It “determined not to proceed” as the project seemed unlikely to “deliver the originally anticipated operational benefits.”

Reached for comment, the governor’s press office pointed The Epoch Times to a follow-up post by Abbott in which he acknowledged the change of plans by DFW and said, “It was clearly illegal.”

Houston Facility

While the issue appears to be closed at DFW, the George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH) in Houston has had a wudu washing facility in place for close to two years now.

In late October 2024, the Houston branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR-Houston) held an official recognition ceremony to celebrate the Houston airport as “one of the first airports in the U.S. to offer such amenities,” and for “setting a new standard for inclusivity and traveler comfort.”

CAIR-Houston said at the time that wudu is “an Islamic ritual of purification.”

The wudu room in Houston includes “benches, coat racks, and space for luggage” and is “fully ADA-accessible,” it said.

The Texas governor is pressing the case that the Houston facility is also illegal. The Epoch Times contacted IAH for comment but received only an automated reply.

In majority Muslim nations, public facilities such as airports often have rooms or at least stations to assist in this cleaning, as observant Muslims pray at five distinct times during most days.

These are less common in nations without Muslim majorities, but some Western airports have them. London’s Heathrow Airport has wudu capabilities in its multi-faith prayer rooms. O’Hare International Airport, which services the Chicago metro, has interfaith chapels with wudu functions.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) did not return The Epoch Times’ request for clarification on whether or not it considered a Muslim washing room to be illegal at an American international airport by the time of publication.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/16/2026 – 22:10

The Democrats’ Hasan Piker Problem Is Getting Worse

survivalnomics
-
0
The Democrats’ Hasan Piker Problem Is Getting Worse

The Democratic Party has so much going for it in the 2026 midterm election season, yet it looks like one man in particular might blow it for them. Hasan Piker, the 35-year-old left-wing influencer, is becoming a genuine electoral liability that could extend well beyond the races he’s personally gotten involved in, and according to a report from the Wall Street Journal, Democrats are trying to do something about it.

In Michigan, Piker has been campaigning alongside Democrat U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed despite warnings from party operatives who would rather he didn’t. The two have continued campaigning together even as Democratic officials worry the association could bleed into contests in Texas, Georgia, Wisconsin and Maine, states where Piker hasn’t lifted a finger for any candidate. That’s the nature of viral notoriety. A candidate doesn’t need Piker in the room to become an issue because of him.

Piker built his following on livestreams that pull in an audience of millions, a platform he has used to deliver commentary that ranges from standard progressive fare to remarks widely considered to be antisemitic, particularly his treatment of Israel and its supporters. Piker rejects the antisemitism charge, saying his quarrel is with Israel and its defenders rather than with Jews.

In addition to his criticism of Israel, one of his most controversial remarks was that America “deserved 9/11,” a line he later claimed he should have phrased more carefully.

Even as his rhetoric becomes a liability for the party he’s trying to help, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) have aligned themselves with him, while others are drawing a line in the sand. Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) and strategist James Carville both threatened to walk away from the party over Piker’s rising influence within it, though Carville later softened the threat.

Two primaries in two weeks offered the first real test. Even though El-Sayed won his Michigan Senate primary on Aug. 4, his margin of victory was smaller than polls predicted. A week later in Wisconsin, DSA-aligned Francesca Hong lost the gubernatorial primary despite polls showing her with a commanding lead. Notably, neither Ocasio-Cortez nor Sanders endorsed Hong, even as both went to bat for El-Sayed.

Piker rejects the idea that he’s dragging down Democratic candidates. “I don’t think that progressives have a harder time beating Republicans,” he told the Wall Street Journal. “I think that logic is flawed. It’s just somewhat untested.”

Despite his claim, the record on progressive and socialist candidates winning outside deep blue turf is thin to nonexistent. Progressive mayors run Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle and New York City under Karen Bass, Brandon Johnson, Katie Wilson and Zohran Mamdani, and Democrats hold every governorship on the West Coast plus Massachusetts and Illinois. Every one of those wins happened on turf Democrats were always going to carry. The candidates who actually flipped competitive ground, Barack Obama and Joe Biden among them, ran as moderates first and only governed further left once in power. Piker’s theory requires competitive states to behave like safe ones. They haven’t yet, and nothing in this cycle suggests they’re about to start.

Republicans have been playing both sides of this. In Wisconsin, GOP-aligned super PACs spent millions on ads calling Hong “too liberal” – an attempt to hand her the nomination and an easier general election to their own candidate. Their opposition researchers have been just as busy with Piker. They’ve resurfaced a hostile exchange Piker had with a woman who identified herself as a refugee from a Marxist regime, along with his reaction to Hong’s primary loss, and both clips are now doing steady rotation in attack ads across multiple states. The combative instincts that built Piker’s audience are proving just as useful to the people trying to end Democratic careers as they were to the people who wanted him amplifying their own.

Carville’s walk-back and Fetterman’s hedge suggest party leadership understands the risk even if it can’t agree on what to do about it. AOC and Sanders embracing Piker points to a faction that either doesn’t see that risk or has decided it’s worth the trade. Both camps are operating inside the same party, running in the same midterms, sharing the same brand and trying to pull it in opposite directions.

The Democrat Party isn’t shaking Hasan Piker loose anytime soon, and the longer leadership avoids confronting that, the more permanent the association becomes. Every week they stay silent, Republicans bank another data point for their general election messaging. Democrats keep telling themselves this is a manageable problem, but it clearly isn’t.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/16/2026 – 21:35

Oh, So This Is Why Luigi Mangione Pleaded Guilty…

survivalnomics
-
0
Oh, So This Is Why Luigi Mangione Pleaded Guilty…

Authored by Matt Margolis via PJMedia.com,

Luigi Mangione, the man whose assassination of a health insurance executive turned him into a folk hero to many on the left, shocked the country on Friday when he finally admitted to the killing and changed his plea to guilty.

“I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan. I understood that my actions would place him in fear of death of bodily injury. I knew what I was doing was illegal,” Mangione told the judge.

He admitted to stalking his victim, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, in the weeks before he gunned him down. The guilty plea locks in a consequence few outside the courtroom seemed to notice at first: a state court can no longer try Mangione for murder.

Mangione had spent more than a year cultivating an image as a martyr willing to fight the system to the end.

So why did he suddenly fold and admit everything?

According to Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley, the answer has nothing to do with a guilty conscience. Turley discussed the plea with host Charlie Hurt on Fox & Friends Weekend on Saturday, and argued the move was a calculated legal gamble aimed at avoiding a life sentence rather than any sign of remorse.

Mangione pleaded guilty to federal stalking charges connected to Thompson’s murder. He still faces a separate state trial in New York scheduled for September. That’s where things get interesting, because the two cases carry sharply different stakes. The federal charge carries a possible sentence of life without parole. New York’s state system has no such option available.

“The New York case is the case that involves the murder charges, but it is also the case that has a lower potential ceiling for the sentencing,” Turley said.

Turley described the plea as “something of a Hail Mary throw,” suggesting Mangione is hoping a judge eventually reduces his sentence enough to allow release at an advanced age rather than locking him away for life without parole. The real target, Turley explained, is the state murder case itself. The defense wants it dismissed entirely on double jeopardy grounds, and New York’s double jeopardy standard is easier for a defense to clear than in most other jurisdictions.

“The odds are in his favor, if you look at past cases, that that may in fact be dismissed,” Turley said.

If Turley is right, a man who executed a father of two on a Manhattan sidewalk in broad daylight could walk away from the murder charge entirely on a technicality, having already secured the lighter of his two possible sentencing outcomes.

Turley also had sharp words for Mangione’s attorney, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, who stood outside the Manhattan courthouse after the plea and told reporters the system had treated her client unfairly, pointing to his chronic back pain and laying blame on the healthcare industry.

Turley noted that the judge overseeing the case has already faced heavy criticism for dismissing key charges against Mangione before trial. Grandstanding to the cameras, he suggested, made little strategic sense.

“I don’t think it helps to go in front of her courthouse and say, ‘My client’s a victim and has been unfairly treated in the system,'” Turley said.

A guilty plea usually means accountability. In Mangione’s case, it looks more like a legal chess move by a defendant hoping the math works out in his favor.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/16/2026 – 21:00

Military Contractor’s Spy Aircraft Quietly Flying Southern Border On Mysterious Mission

survivalnomics
-
0
Military Contractor’s Spy Aircraft Quietly Flying Southern Border On Mysterious Mission

The Pentagon says it does not discuss contractor support to particular missions. The gear aboard mimics cell towers.

Private military contractor Metrea has spent months quietly operating two surveillance-equipped aircraft along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to the Arizona Mirror.

Via the Arizona Mirror

The planes have traversed Arizona, New Mexico and Texas, circling at high altitude over border cities including Bisbee and Douglas in Arizona, and Laredo and El Paso in Texas.

Metrea holds multiple contracts with the U.S. military, including a $5.7 million award to support training for U.S. Special Operations Command. The company also conducts simulated training missions for the Marine Corps.

It performs comparable border work overseas, providing what it describes as advanced aerial surveillance to the Australian government for monitoring that country’s border regions.

Arizona Mirror reports:

One of the major pieces of equipment installed on the aircraft is a DRT 3300, also sometimes referred to as a “dirtbox.” A dirtbox is a piece of equipment that mimics a cell phone tower and acts in a similar manner to “stingray” devices that track cell phones and reportedly can even intercept messages.

It isn’t the only equipment on the aircraft meant for “signals intelligence” either. Signals intelligence refers to the collection of information that is transmitted through the airwaves such as radio, wifi or other electronic means. One of the aircraft lists a “Windjammer System” as a piece of equipment that has been installed.

The Trump administration declined to say what the aircraft are doing over the border, or which agency they are working for.

A DHS spokesperson told the Mirror that Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations and Customs and Border Protection were not flying with Metrea along the southern border. The department did not answer whether the flights support a DHS or a Defense Department mission.

“The Department of War contracts with a number of companies, including Metrea, to provide capabilities in support of military operations across the globe. For operations security reasons, we do not discuss specific contractor support to particular missions or operations,” a Defense Department spokesperson wrote in a statement to the Arizona Mirror. “These activities are governed by Attorney General approved procedures that ensure the activities are conducted in a manner that protects the constitutional and legal rights and the privacy and civil liberties of U.S. citizens.”

Metrea did not respond to repeated requests for comment. Meanwhile, Metrea’s are not the only contractor aircraft working the border. The Mirror reports that a jet belonging to Tenax Aerospace, equipped with high-end mapping technology and previously spotted over the South China Sea and Nigeria, has flown the same route since July.

Civil liberties advocates contend that the secrecy itself is the problem.

“Whatever security rationales are used to justify mass surveillance, whether it is patrolling the border or pursuing the war on drugs, if you’re intent on pursuing those policies you have to do it in a way that respects the privacy and constitutional rights of Americans,” said Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, in a statement to the Arizona Mirror.

“Number one, you need policies that ensure transparency so we know what government agencies are doing with the brand new powers that technology is giving them that humans have never had in history,” Stanley added. “No matter what your position is, you should agree that it is done in the democratic process and not done by government officials behind closed doors.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/16/2026 – 20:25

1...150151152...4,508Page 151 of 4,508

About Us

Popular Category

Editor Picks