52.1 F
Chicago
Monday, October 5, 2026
Home Blog Page 1942

Russia Achieves Major Battlefield Breakthrough In Eastern Ukraine As Trump Inauguration Nears

0
Russia Achieves Major Battlefield Breakthrough In Eastern Ukraine As Trump Inauguration Nears

Russia on Monday announced a key breakthrough in eastern Ukraine, saying its forces have captured the “important logistics hub” of Kurakhove, following months of steady gains.

Russian forces “have fully liberated the town of Kurakhove — the biggest settlement in southwestern Donbas,” the Defense Ministry (MoD) announced on Telegram.

The MoD claimed further that the Ukrainian army had lost more than 12,000 of the 15,000 troops deployed to defend Kurakhove, figures which are not independently verifiable. The military also said Ukraine lost about “3,000 pieces of various weapons and military hardware, including 40 tanks and other armored combat vehicles.”

Illustrative file image: Reuters

The city has long been a strategic Ukrainian army stronghold in the Donetsk region, with an industrial zone and a (since shuttered) thermal plant and a reservoir. The city’s importance is also in its location, sitting on a central highway connecting eastern and southern Ukraine.

The fight for Kurakhove has been on since mid-October, during which time heavy shelling has persisted. The Russian MoD statement has additionally described Kurakhove as “a powerful fortified area with a developed network of pillboxes and underground communications.”

A Ukrainian military official has claimed the Russian victory declarations are premature. “As of this morning, battles were ongoing within [the city] limits, so the enemy’s announcements about capturing the city are clearly rushed,” a spokesman said.

However, there is some independent confirmation of the Russian breakthrough via Associated Press and other regional sources:

According to Meduza’s military analysts, Russian forces reached the center of Kurakhove in mid-December, encircling nearly the entire city from the north, east, and south, and raising the Russian flag over the municipal government headquarters. At the time, however, Ukrainian forces still controlled the power station’s industrial zone and the pipe plant on the western side of the city. Ukrainian troops were forced out of the industrial zone just before New Year’s day and are now holding positions in Dachne, a village on Kurakhove’s outskirts, Meduza’s analysts say. 

DeepState, an OSINT project with close ties to the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, also shows that Russian forces have seized Kurakhove. This comes after Ukrainian analysts reported that Russian troops were advancing in the area on January 5. 

Overhead view of the war-ravaged city of Kurakhove:

Both warring sides have been seeking to achieve as much battlefield dominance as possible before Donald Trump takes office in two weeks. 

While Moscow was already in the driver’s seat, the capture of Kurakhove is being widely viewed as a decisive victory which will provide Russia with clear major leverage for any potential ceasefire negotiations under a new Trump administration.

Analyst Michael Kofman of the Carnegie Endowment was quoted in AP as saying the future looks bleak for Kiev: “Ukraine is losing territory. The coldest part of the winter is yet ahead. The current theory of success is unclear, or what resources will be made available by the West in 2025,” he summarized.

Map source: ISW/Newsweek

And Washington Post writes, “Ukraine is in an increasingly dire state as Russia captures territory at the fastest pace since the start of the invasion, with Moscow capitalizing on its greatest advantage: manpower.”

Ukraine has in the past days launched a significant counteroffensive in Russia’s Kursk territory, but this accomplishes little strategically where the main theatre of war is happening in Donetsk. Russia has been patiently seeking to gain back ground in the border territory, with the population still evacuated.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 16:40

The Biden Admin’s ‘Prank-O-Rama’…

0
The Biden Admin’s ‘Prank-O-Rama’…

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

“They found a cure for gluttony. Now do narcissism.”

– Peachy Keenan

Poor “Joe Biden” can’t help himself as the suns sets on his ignominious career.

He ordered the American flag to fly at half-staff into January 20, inauguration day, to signal grief and distress at Donald Trump’s swearing-in – not realizing, apparently, that Mr. Trump’s first act in office will be to order the flags raised back up, signaling symbolically the end to America’s grief and distress under “Joe Biden.”

You might wonder: what other sort of vicious mischief the Party of Chaos has in store in the final ramp-up to a momentous change of government? Well, no sooner had ol’ “JB” draped the Wegovy-slenderized neck of Hillary Clinton with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, than Bill Clinton went on ABC’s The View to declare he was “open to talking with [‘President Biden’]” about a preemptive pardon for Hillary.

Say, whu. . . ? What crimes did Bill have in mind that such a pardon might avail? Skolkovo? Uranium One? The Clinton Foundation’s sketchy activities in Haiti after the earthquake there? Bill preemptively mentioned the old emails bidness as a ruse. Nothing to see there, folks, he protested. (Just don’t look anywhere else!)

You must imagine that the incoming Solicitor General, John Sauer’s, first act in office will be to ask SCOTUS for a ruling on the legitimacy of preemptive pardons – blanket pardons for crimes alive perhaps in guilty consciences but nowhere extant as yet in the legal system. The justices might detect a certain logical incoherence in that proposition. “Joe Biden” should have just draped wreaths of garlic around the necks of Mrs. Clinton, Liz Cheney, and Alex Soros (standing in for ol’ George).

Judge Juan Merchan did not get a medal. He’s warming up for his January 10 stunt of sentencing of Mr. Trump for the “felony” of recording a payment to lawyer Michael Cohen as a “legal expense” (times thirty-four) so Democrats can holler “nyah nyah, felon!” as Mr. Trump re-enters the Oval Office. Judge Merchan himself has racked-up an impressive list of federal offenses around deprivation of Mr. Trump’s civil rights and due process issues as well as judicial misconduct, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power. Justice may await the judge.

Today, January 6, of course, is electoral vote certification day in a joint session of Congress. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has been making noises about contesting certification on the grounds that Mr. Trump is an “insurrectionist” under the disqualification clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Don’t be surprised if Jamie makes a show of it to justify all his loose talk, but it will only be a performance. He might as well bring a chicken into the chamber and bite its head off.

The shadowy claque behind “Joe Biden” has been super-busy cooking up documents for the demented old bird to sign before leaving office, anything that supposedly might discommode the incoming Mr. Trump. “JB” is like a bandit fleeing the scene of a crime, throwing his stolen booty into the road off the back of his truck to trip up the police closing in. Close down offshore oil drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts for evermore. . . ban gas-powered water heaters. . . any old thing to make life more uncomfortable for the people of this land. The shadowy claque seems oblivious to the fact that the people won’t appreciate these pranks, that they just give more reasons for them to drive a wooden stake through the heart of the Democratic Party — as if it even had one.

Prank-of-the-week, though, goes to Tony Blinken’s State Department. No sooner had Congress defunded his agency’s Global Engagement Center (GEC) — that is, its censorship coordination hub — than the muppets at State redistributed GEC’s personnel to other corners of the agency and scared up new funding for their censorship activities from some dark hidey-hole of sequestered money. Do they suppose no one will find out where these employees went? All that’s necessary is to look up who was on the GEC’s payroll in 2024, and earlier in the hub’s heyday, and see if they remain on the State Department’s payroll now — and then fire the whole lot of them for cause: abrogating Americans’ First Amendment rights. Buh-bye. . . .

You are not out-of-order worrying, of course, that the political Left and the deep state blob behind them might look, in desperation, for other ways to prevent Donald Trump from getting sworn in. There’s the president-elect’s rally in DC the night before the inauguration. Not a few MAGAs are wondering if that’s really a good idea. And the recent garish drone swarms around the USA have put folks ill at ease about a swearing-in on the west front of the US Capitol, out in the open air. I’d even be a little concerned about the mechanicals of Mr. Trump’s airplane as he flies north from Mar-a-Lago to the big event in Washington.

Nobody will surprised if “Joe Biden” does not show up on the dais at the Capitol that fateful day. He at least has one final snub left for Mr. Trump as “JB” departs office with the pardon he will preemptively lay on himself in the wee hours of January 19 — in case anyone might inquire into all those shadow companies that First Son Hunter was running over the years to receive money from China, Ukraine, Russia, Romania, and Gawd knows who else, to be redistributed (i.e., laundered) through the innumerable bank accounts of Biden family members. There is that to consider.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 16:20

4 Years Later: Americans Still Divided Over January 6

0
4 Years Later: Americans Still Divided Over January 6

When a large mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, in an alleged attempt to stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election, the images of the chaos unfolding at the historic building sent shockwaves around the world. After all, this was the United States, once a shining light of democracy, on what the media described as the precipice of political collapse.

Fast forward four years and Donald Trump, the man who was widely condemned (even by members of his own party) and later indicted for his role in the proceedings, is about to return to the White House.

Trump’s political comeback, which seemed impossible in the immediate aftermath of the attack on the Capitol, was accompanied by a gradual shift in the narrative of the events of January 6.

Back in 2021, Trump himself described the events as a “heinous attack on the United States Capitol”, promising that the protesters who had “defiled the seat of American democracy” would pay for their actions.

And pay they did.

As of December 6, 2024, the U.S. Justice Department had charged more than 1,500 individuals for federal crimes associated with the Capitol breach, of which almost 1,000 plead guilty to at least some of the charges and another 255 were found guilty in trial.

And yet, in October 2024, Trump – now the Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election – no longer condemned the events of January 6, instead calling it “a day of love”, much to the outrage of the 138 police officers injured during the attack.

And like Trump’s stance on the January rioters has softened – he even promised to pardon the “peaceful protesters” last May – so has the public view of what happened that day, at least among Republican voters. According to a recent poll conducted by YouGov and The Economist, 56 percent of Republicans would describe the January 6 events as “people participating in legitimate political discourse”, while just 19 percent would describe the scenes as a violent insurrection.

Infographic: 4 Years Later: Americans Still Divided Over January 6 | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

Unsurprisingly, Democrats have opposing views of what happened, with 79 percent describing the events as a violent insurrection and just 9 percent seeing it as legitimate political protest.

Propaganda works eh?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 15:20

More Details Emerge Of Plan To Kill Supreme Court Justice

0
More Details Emerge Of Plan To Kill Supreme Court Justice

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

A California man allegedly told authorities that he flew to the East Coast to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, according to newly filed court documents.

Nicholas Roske flew across the country from California to Virginia on June 7, 2022, landing just before midnight.

He got into a taxi and instructed the driver to take him to a house in Maryland where Kavanaugh and his family resided.

Roske, who had allegedly brought weapons with him, was close to Kavanaugh’s home on June 8, 2022, but received a call from his sister, whom he had texted, “I love you.”

“I told her what I was doing, I was up to, and she told me that that wasn’t the way to go about trying to make the world a better place and, you know, that she didn’t want to, you know, she wanted to have me as a sibling for the rest of her life and not, you know, with that ending,” Roske said in the interview room inside a Montgomery County Police Department station.

Roske told police officers that he planned to break into the house, shoot Kavanaugh, and then shoot himself, according to a newly filed transcript

He chose to call 911 instead of going through with his plan.

“I need psychiatric help,” he told the dispatcher, in a call that was previously made public.

Officers rushed to the scene and arrested Roske. He is scheduled to go on trial later this year and faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

Roske’s lawyers filed the interrogation transcript, along with other documents, as part of motions seeking to suppress statements he made to law enforcement, as well as any mention of the items officers allegedly found in his suitcase and bag.

Officers illegally searched Roske’s belongings and failed to properly obtain a waiver of his rights before interviewing him, the lawyers said.

Federal agents who questioned Roske did obtain his signature on a form waiving his rights, but that waiver “was not made voluntarily and intelligently,” the lawyers wrote in one of the motions.

“At the time, Mr. Roske was acutely suicidal, visibly exhausted, and had repeatedly expressed his need for psychiatric care,” the motion states. “Because these latter statements were not preceded by valid Miranda waivers, they too must be suppressed.”

Prosecutors have not yet responded to the motions.

Motivation

Elsewhere in the newly released interview transcript, Roske detailed his motivation for allegedly plotting to murder Kavanaugh, including the publication of a leaked draft of a Supreme Court ruling that would overturn Roe v. Wade, giving states the ability to more closely regulate abortion.

“I’ve been suicidal for a long time, and when I saw that the leaked draft, it made me upset and then it made me want to, I don’t know,” Roske said. “I was under the delusion that I could make the world a better place by killing him.”

Nicholas Roske, center, is interrogated in Montgomery County, Md., on June 8, 2022. Nicholas Roske via The Epoch Times

Roske said another motivating factor was that he heard the Supreme Court was going to loosen gun restrictions, which would make it easier for people to acquire guns.

Roske agreed that it was ironic he was able to obtain a gun before he traveled to the Washington area.

He had several psychiatric holds placed on him in the past. However, since more than five years had passed since the last one, this did not prevent him from buying a firearm.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 15:00

Houthis Claim “Winged Missile & Drone” Attack On USS Harry S. Truman In Red Sea

0
Houthis Claim “Winged Missile & Drone” Attack On USS Harry S. Truman In Red Sea

During a Monday evening press conference, Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree claimed that the Yemeni Armed Forces targeted the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) aircraft carrier with missiles and drones in the Red Sea area. 

Saree claimed that the Yemeni Armed Forces targeted US warships to thwart an imminent US-led “attack against our country.” 

Here’s the complete statement: 

Triumphing for the oppression of the Palestinian people and their Mujahideen and in response to the massacres against our people in Gaza, and within the fifth phase of the supportive stages in the battle of the Promised Conquest and the Holy Jihad.

The missile and UAVs forces of the Yemeni Armed Forces carried out a specific and joint military operation targeting the American aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman using two winged missiles and four drones north of the Red Sea, while the American enemy was preparing to launch a major attack against our country, and the operation led to the failure of the attack.

The UAVs forces carried out two military operations this afternoon, the first of which targeted a military target linked to the Israeli enemy in the occupied area of Yaffa with two drones.

The other operation targeted a vital target linked to the Israeli enemy in occupied Ashkelon with a drone.

In another context, the UAVs force carried out a third military operation this evening targeting a military target linked to the Israeli enemy in the occupied Yaffa with a drone. The operations of the Armed Forces have successfully achieved their objectives.

The Yemeni Armed Forces will continue their operations in support of the Palestinian resistance, and these operations will not stop until the aggression on Gaza stops and the siege is lifted.

US Carrier Strike Group locations as of Dec. 31. 

US Central Command (CENTCOM) has not released a statement regarding the incident.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 14:40

Conspiracies Too Awful To Imagine?

0
Conspiracies Too Awful To Imagine?

Authored by Victor Davis Hanson via American Greatness,

Over the decade of Donald Trump’s political career, the left – as exemplified by Democratic politicos, the media, academics, the Washington military hierarchy, and the permeant bureaucratic state – illustrated a level of furor, venom, and near madness unprecedented in modern American history.

Yet stranger still about such visceral, indeed lunatic hatred, despite Trump’s eccentricities and lack of a traditional political resume, his administration between 2017-21 was successful by traditional economic, military, security, and diplomatic standards. It was certainly not characterized by weaponizing the DOJ, Pentagon, CIA, or FBI, get-even vendettas, the use of lawfare, corruption, optional wars, open borders, hyperinflation, or a war on the environment—as predicted and alleged. Nevertheless, the idea of Trump as president justified to the left the greatest assault on our civil liberties, justice system, and free expression in modern history.

Indeed, at times the frenzy has ranged the gamut of an unprecedented two impeachments, a first Senate impeachment trial of a private citizen ex-president, and a coordinated effort to deplatform the major Republican presidential candidate from state ballots.

But at other times, the efforts were more sinister—and conspiratorial—to the point that the attempt to destroy the purported threat of candidate, president, and two-time candidate Trump apparently justified any means necessary.

In retrospect, what is the legacy of these unmatched efforts? They have established precedents, if ever again followed, will destroy the republic as we have known it.

1. “Russian collusion.”

There was never any evidence that a 2016 Trump candidacy sought to “steal” the election through the intervention of the Putin Russian government. But a paranoid Clinton campaign, through the deliberate paywalls and agency of the DNC, Perkins Coie law firm, and Fusion GPS consulting firm, hired a retread ex-British spy, Christopher Steele—who was also FBI Director James Comey’s paid informant—to fabricate a “dossier” of invented scandals and salacious sex detail to smear Trump and ensure his defeat.

That effort required sowing the dossier throughout the government, partnering with traditional and social media, warping the FISA courts, forging an FBI-submitted document, and ambushing and destroying the National Security Advisor designate Gen. Michael Flynn.

Two years later, the self-congratulatory Robert Mueller’s “dream team” and “all-stars” of liberal beltway lawyers evaporated after finding no such Trump-Russian collusion—after a wasted nearly two years and $40 million. Meanwhile, revelations emerged of all sorts of covert FBI skullduggery—from erasing incriminating cell phone records, the revelations of the Strzok-Page text exchanges indicating an apparent FBI “insurance policy” effort to preclude a winning Trump candidacy, to the meltdown of Director Comey himself, who lied to the president that he was not a target of an investigation and then leaked confidential records of a private one-on-one presidential conversation to the media.

2. Indeed, during the Trump administration, we witnessed once more undreamed-of efforts to sabotage a presidency:

a) A former Pentagon lawyer publishing a call for either immediate Trump impeachment, 25th Amendment removal, or a military coup.

b) A planning session of the Deputy Attorney General and Interim FBI Director to discuss stealthily recording the President of the United States in hopes of finding enough off-the-record embarrassing conversations to justify a 25th Amendment removal.

c) A later 2020 campaign effort jumpstarted by the current Biden Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the former interim CIA Director Mike Morrell, with help from former CIA Directors John Brennan and Leon Panetta, along with former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, to round up 51 “former” (but actually many enjoying then-current CIA contractor status) “intelligence authorities” to publicly mislead the public by signing a letter that the incriminating Hunter Biden laptop (then in the hands of and authenticated as genuine by the FBI) was once again a Russian effort to throw the election to Trump. It was an obvious scripted lie, but timely scheduled before the last debate to arm Biden with plausible denials and thus to help swing the election to him. And it likely did.

d) There was, in addition, an effort by the heads of the NIH, Francis Collins, and NIAID, Anthony Fauci, deliberately to obfuscate, and allegedly in the case of Fauci, to lie under oath, about the efforts of American health authorities 1) to evade U.S. prohibitions on gain-in-function viral research, by funding the third-party EcoHealth Alliance to facilitate the transference of American money, instrumentation, and consulting to partner with the Chinese communist Wuhan virology lab; 2) to obfuscate the truth that the lab had somehow leaked the lethal, manmade virus—birthed with the help of U.S. expertise—that was killing millions worldwide; 3) to promulgate a false scenario of a bat/pangolin origin; 4) to deny under oath the American government’s role in the birth of the virus; 5) to suppress dissident scientific voices; and 6) to advise radical quarantine policies that would virtually destroy the U.S. economy along with the Trump 2020 reelection effort, and then shift blame from their own culpability to a false narrative that Trump was the chief driver of a disastrous national shutdown that had ruined the economy and yet was supposedly nearly criminally lax in controlling the outbreak.

e) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, took it upon himself to 1) violate his own legal prerogatives as an advisory military official by unlawfully interrupting the chain of command when ordering theater commanders to report directly to him rather than as legally required to the Secretary of Defense in times of national crises, and 2) without presidential or Pentagon written authority, contacted his Chinese communist counterpart, Gen. Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army. His stated aim apparently was to reassure the Chinese military that in Milley’s own view, if he should diagnose Trump, his own commander-in-chief, as unbalanced and intending to escalate tensions to the threshold of a possible nuclear war, Milley again would first contact General Zuocheng to reassure him that an erratic Trump would then be not in full command of American strategic forces. Then he, Milley, with others, would seek to de-escalate tensions and preclude a conflict.

Milley denied any impropriety. But he could not negate that he had no such authority to act on the part of the executive branch and was doing so in direct opposition to the President of the United States. Milley was also de facto creating a dangerous precedent for any future ambitious, freelancing chairmen of the Joint Chiefs, both to interrupt the chain of command and to self-diagnose their commander-in-chief to justify excluding him from exercising his responsibilities entailed in his oath of office.

f) In the 2020 election cycle, left-wing-funded legal teams systematically and under the guise of the COVID lockdown sued in favorable courts to overturn or modify state balloting laws to ensure the most radical and abrupt changes in U.S. voting procedures in history.

The net result was that in many key states, traditional Election Day balloting that had accounted for 60-80 percent of the cast votes was made a mere construct. Instead, some 60-70 percent of voters in many key states cast early- or mail-in ballots, even as the traditional rejection rate of such ballots drastically fell—again, as the numbers to be counted soared.

g) During this same 2020 election, according to liberal journalist Molly Ball, writing triumphantly post facto in Time magazine, a named “cabal” and “conspiracy” of billionaire leftist grandees, Silicon Valley monopolists, Chamber of Commerce, corporate entities, labor, and street activists sought to change balloting laws, street modulate demonstrations, enlist social media to censor and shape the news, partner with the FBI, and provide hundreds of millions of dollars to absorb the work of state registrars by supplying their own adjutant employees and voting materials. This was a holistic effort, Ball proudly wrote, that helped guarantee a Biden victory.

h) During 2021-2024, there were 91 local, state, and federal felony indictments launched against the ex-president and then-current front-running Republican candidate and opponent of the sitting president Biden. The charges were so blatantly political, and the principals in direct or indirect contact with either the White House counsel, the Department of Justice, or each other, that the multifaceted effort could be rightly termed a conspiracy to warp the legal system by destroying a political opponent. The charges would never have been brought against any other political candidate or against Trump himself—had he not publicly announced his intention to run a third time for president.

3. Never in recent election history had a presidential candidate in the midst of the final stretch of the campaign been the target of two assassination attempts – in part enabled by a climate of widespread and acceptable vituperation that equated Trump with a vile Hitler, fascist, Nazi, and dictator and thus encouraged unhinged would-be killers to delude themselves into believing they would forever be enshrined as heroes.

And never would social media influencers, columnists, and celebrities voice near approval of such attempts on the leading presidential candidate’s life.

The first would-be assassin was an amateur shooter, who easily evaded Secret Service scrutiny to post himself in sight of bystanders, as he enjoyed a direct line of fire at Trump. Meanwhile, local law enforcement was desperately trying, in vain, to warn the lax Secret Service of the immediate danger to the president. The second wannabe assassin approached with impunity the most recognizably vulnerable spot on a local golf course, staked out a shooting position, and would have, if not spotted, been within minutes of having an uninterrupted shot at the president.

4. Finally, not since the Woodrow Wilson scandal of 1919-1920, have the media and the Democratic left conspired to hide the morbidities of a president that left him unfit mentally and physically to carry out the duties of the office.

That current and still ongoing covert effort put the nation at great risk, as evidenced by the catastrophic humiliation in Kabul, the successful Russian gamble that the U.S. would not or could not deter Putin from invading Ukraine, the unsteady and anemic reaction to the theater-wide wars in the Middle East, the hyperinflation of 2021-2, the erasure of the southern border, the deliberate greenlighting of some 12 million illegal aliens into the United States, and the weaponization of the FBI, CIA, and DOJ.

The final irony?

Those who were perpetrators of these illicit, unethical, and unprecedented efforts were themselves the first and most prominent to project Trump as the promulgator of conspiracies to debilitate the very institutions that they had already undermined and disgraced.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 14:20

First Bond Auction Of 2025 Tails As Foreign Buyers Slide

0
First Bond Auction Of 2025 Tails As Foreign Buyers Slide

The first bond auction of 2025 is in the books, and it was about as pretty as the selloff in bonds has been in recent weeks.

Moments ago the Treasury sold $58 billion in 3 year paper in a soggy auction which suggested that, today’s modest bounce notwithstanding, there is more pain in stock for the rates complex.

The auction priced at a high yield of 4.332%, tailing the When Issued 4.320% by 1.2bps. This was the fourth consecutive tail and the largest once since April.

The bid to cover held up, rising to 2.616 from 2.577 in December, and above the six auction average of 2.585.

Internals, however, were nowhere near as solid with Indirects taking down 61.0%, down from 64.2% and the lowest since October (as well as below the recent average of 66.4%).  And with Directs taking down 19.4%, down from 20.7% last month, Dealers were left with 19.7%, up from 15.11% and above the six-auction average of 15.8%.

Not surprisingly, the news of the ugly auction did not help already shaky sentiment, and yields on the benchmark 10Y rose 2bps to 4.63%, just shy of session highs at 4.64%, even as the dollar still remains soggy and down on the session after today’s fake news report by the WaPo which hammered the greenback just as the WaPo’s “anonymous sources”, who may or may not have been axed in various USD pairs, intended.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 14:12

The Lawfare Sentencing Of Trump On January 10 Will Backfire

0
The Lawfare Sentencing Of Trump On January 10 Will Backfire

Update (1220ET): President-Elect Donald Trump is attempting to halt proceedings in his business records case, with his attorneys stating that they intend to file an appeal to reverse a decision setting sentencing for Jan. 10.

His request came on Jan. 6, just days after Merchan’s decision on Jan. 3.

Trump’s lawyers argued that their appeal should trigger what’s known as an automatic stay, or pause, in the proceedings. If that doesn’t happen, they argued, Merchan should then grant a pause and prevent sentencing from happening on Friday as scheduled.

“Today, President Trump’s legal team moved to stop the unlawful sentencing in the Manhattan D.A.’s Witch Hunt,” Trump’s spokesperson, Steven Cheung, said.

“The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the state constitution of New York, and other established legal precedent mandate that this meritless hoax be immediately dismissed.”

As a reminder, in December, Merchan rejected Trump’s various immunity-related objections to the evidence used during trial.

*  *  *

As MishTalk.com’s Mike Shedlock detailed earlier, MAGA supporters rail against Trump’s sentencing ahead of his inauguration. Instead, they should be pleased.

Let’s discuss why…

Sentencing on January 10

Politico reports Trump Will Be Sentenced but Won’t Get Jail Time.

A New York judge plans to sentence Donald Trump on Jan. 10 for his criminal hush money conviction, rejecting efforts by the president-elect to sweep aside a jury’s verdict that found him guilty of 34 felony counts.

But Justice Juan Merchan indicated he will not sentence Trump to prison time, acknowledging that incarceration is not a “practicable” option. And the judge said Trump may attend the sentencing virtually rather than reporting to court in person.

The long-delayed sentencing — unless a higher court blocks it — will force Trump to revisit the sordid hush money case just 10 days before his inauguration. And by maintaining the jury’s verdict, Merchan all but ensured that Trump will take office with his sole criminal conviction still on his record.

In an 18-page decision Friday, Merchan ruled that the Supreme Court’s July decision on presidential immunity does not shield Trump from facing sentencing for the conviction. And the judge rejected Trump’s arguments that the entire case should be thrown out in light of his victory in the 2024 election, calling the suggestion an affront to the justice system.

Merchan also sharply criticized Trump for his “disdain” for the legal process. In addition to continually criticizing the case itself, Trump repeatedly argued for Merchan to recuse himself, claiming the judge was biased. During the trial, he disobeyed the judge’s gag order and often appeared to fall asleep in court.

Democrats Cheer, for Now

Sentencing ahead of the inauguration will let Democrats claim Trump will take office with his sole criminal conviction on his record.

I view this as mostly good news.

Q: Why?

A: Sentencing now will speed up the appeals process.

This is a sham trial that never should have happened. And the mistakes made by Merchan ensure the case will be tossed out.

Had Merchan delayed sentencing, Democrats might have held sentencing over Trump for four more years.

Hunter Biden Convicted

On June 11, I commented Hunter Biden Convicted, Unlike Trump, Hunter’s Conviction Won’t Be Overturned

Hey Joe, how does it feel to have a son convicted of a felony? For now you can call Trump a felon, but that won’t last due to numerous and flagrant judicial errors.

Trump Found Guilty – a Travesty of Justice for America

I commented on Trump in my post Trump Found Guilty – a Travesty of Justice for America

I Am Outraged

I am outraged but not surprised. But the hypocrites will cheer hoping for a knockout.

They will say “No one is above the law”. Indeed. But no one should be beneath the law either.

Every effort has been made to put Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and Hillary Clinton above the law. And every effort has been made to put Trump beneath the law, including judicial instructions.

Everyone should be outraged. The trial was unfair because there should not have been a trial at all. The judge’s actions were outrageous.

Pardon vs Overturned Conviction

President Biden lied about Hunter. Then is a disgraceful move, the president pardoned his son.

However, accepting a pardon implies guilt. Hunter won’t go to prison where he belongs. But no one can say he wasn’t guilty.

If New York Governor Kathy Hochul offers Trump a pardon, he should refuse it on grounds of innocence.

And as soon as the Trump conviction is overturned, and it will be, no one will be able to call Trump a felon.

Sentencing now will speed up an appeal, and the conviction will be tossed, hopefully with prejudice.

So let the hypocrites have another month or whatever of bragging. Then reality will set in with an easy overturn on multiple grounds.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 12:20

UK’s Starmer Dismisses Rape Gang Outrage As “Far-Right Bandwagon”

0
UK’s Starmer Dismisses Rape Gang Outrage As “Far-Right Bandwagon”

After news broke that UK’s ‘safeguarding minister’ Jess Phillips blocked a public inquiry into the country’s prolific rape gangs, Prime Minister Keir Starmer – who allegedly covered for Jimmy Savile, went into victim mode – dismissing the outrage as simply part of the “playbook” of the “far right” – the same thing he said after a Muslim radical stabbed 8 children, killing 3, in the Southport Massacre.

Gangs of predominantly Pakistani men have been raping and torturing vulnerable underage girls over the past three decades, with several independent inquiries having indicated systemic failures to investigate the crimes (because it would be ‘racist’). Three separate reports, published in 2013, 2014 and 2015 revealed that local politicians and police covered up the rapes.

Of note, foreigners are three times as likely to be arrested for sex offenses vs. British citizens.

In response Elon Musk launched an attack on Starmer, accusing him of failing to properly investigate and prosecute the gangs, which he called a “state-sponsored evil,” and alleging that Starmer was “complicit in the RAPE OF BRITAIN.”

And as The Telegraph notes, the state “had to bury the story.”

Denial about the extent of the problem is rooted deep in Britain’s political system. At times, it appears that the government’s approach to multiculturalism is not to uphold the law, but instead to minimise the risk of unrest between communities. Confronted with gangs of predominantly Pakistani men targeting predominantly white children, the state knew exactly what to do. For the good of community relations, it had to bury the story.

In Rotherham, a senior police officer told a distressed father that the town “would erupt” if the routine abuse of white children by Pakistani heritage men became public knowledge. One parent concerned about a missing daughter was told by the police that an “older Asian boyfriend” was a “fashion accessory” for girls in the town. The father of a 15-year-old rape victim was told the assault might mean she would “learn her lesson”.

And of course, instead of accepting responsibility, Starmer responded to Musk’s comments – claiming that “threats” have been made over the blocked inquiry, and insists that the government will “get on with the job of protecting victims.”

Meanwhile, Musk continues to rage:

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 12:00

Mayorkas Says US Facing Complex Threat Landscape Following New Orleans Attack

0
Mayorkas Says US Facing Complex Threat Landscape Following New Orleans Attack

Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,

The United States is facing a “heightened threat environment” following the deadly New Orleans attack on New Year’s Day, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said on Jan. 5.

The attack left 14 people dead and dozens injured after a man drove a truck into crowds on Bourbon Street in the historic French Quarter of the city. The suspect, identified as Shamsud-Din Jabbar of Texas, was later killed in a shoot-out with police.

In an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Mayorkas said that his office has worked with law enforcement in New Orleans and implemented sweeping precautionary measures for the Sugar Bowl college football game and other upcoming events in the wake of the incident.

Mayorkas stated that over the past 10 years, his office has observed “a significant increase in what we term homegrown violent extremism” in the United States.

“It is a very difficult threat landscape, and it is why that we as a community, not just the federal government, but state and local officials and residents, need to be alert to it and take the precautions necessary to avoid violence from occurring,” he told the news outlet.

Mayorkas said that the New Orleans attack was unrelated to border issues, citing the suspect’s U.S. citizenship.

Jabbar was a 42-year-old former U.S. Army soldier from Texas.

“The assailant who perpetrated the terrorist attack in New Orleans was born in the United States, raised in the United States, and served in our Armed Forces. It is not an issue of the border,” Mayorkas said.

“With respect to the border, our highest responsibility and one that we work to fulfill each and every day throughout the Department of Homeland Security, throughout the federal government, is the safety and security of the American people.”

Authorities said they found an ISIS flag on the hitch of the truck used by the suspect. The FBI also said that Jabbar posted videos on Facebook in the hours before the attack in which he proclaimed his support for the terrorist group.

President-elect Donald Trump had previously condemned the New Orleans attack as an “act of pure evil” and suggested that it was connected to the country’s border issues.

“When I said that the criminals coming in are far worse than the criminals we have in our country, that statement was constantly refuted by Democrats and the Fake News Media, but it turned out to be true. The crime rate in our country is at a level that nobody has ever seen before,” Trump stated on Truth Social.

President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden will travel to New Orleans on Monday to “grieve with the families and community members impacted by the tragic attack,” according to a White House statement.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/06/2025 – 11:40