41.6 F
Chicago
Monday, March 10, 2025
Home Blog Page 2556

Aussies Bust Men Smuggling 65 Lbs Of Meth Inside 3D Printers

0
Aussies Bust Men Smuggling 65 Lbs Of Meth Inside 3D Printers

Two men accused of being senior members of an international crime syndicate have been charged in Taiwan over a plot to smuggle 30g (66 lbs) of methamphetamine into Western Australia inside of 3D printers.

On Saturday, authorities announced that two men, aged 33 and 36, were arrested in July and October of this year after the Australian federal police identified them as part of Operation Ironside – a sting between the AFP and US FBI in which they intercepted every single message posted via the AnOm encrypted communications platform for three years beginning in 2018, The Guardian reports.

AFP assistant commissioner Pryce Scanlan said one of the men came to the AFP’s attention after communications intercepted on An0m allegedly indicated he had coordinated more than 30 methamphetamine importations into Australia in 2020.

Intelligence indicates he and his syndicate were attempting to import quantities of up to 100kg at a time,” said Scanlan. “We suspect they were operating long before we started monitoring them and were involved in multiple other drug trafficking plots targeting Australia.”

The plot was discovered by the AFP in partnership with the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC), who discovered the 3D printer plot.

It is alleged the 3D printer was to be used to import the methamphetamines into WA. Photograph: Australian federal police

The drugs were intercepted in the US before the reached Australia, while the Taiwan Criminal Investigation Bureau was able to arrest the 33-year-old suspect in late July in New Taipei City.

The 36-year-old, alleged to be the right-hand man of the first arrestee, was found in Taoyuan City, Taiwan and arrested in early October, according to the AFP. They have both been charged with illegal transportation of a category 2 narcotic and face life in prison if convicted in Taiwan.

“This organised crime group has caused significant harm to the Australian community for a number of years, as well as causing harm offshore,” said Scanlan, who added that the AFP is still investigating potential links to the crime syndicate over foiled imports into Western Australia.

“We allege this operation has taken out two senior members of a TSOC [transnational serious and organised crime] syndicate and disrupted their gateway to import illicit commodities into Australia, which is a significant win for the community.”

According to the AFP, the street value of the seized drugs was around $45 million.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 23:10

Children Should Be “Really Careful” On TikTok, App Is “Genuinely Troubling”: CIA Director

0
Children Should Be “Really Careful” On TikTok, App Is “Genuinely Troubling”: CIA Director

Authored by Naveen Anthrapully via The Epoch Times,

William Burns, the director of CIA, has warned about children being potentially harmed by spending time on TikTok and talked about the dangers posed by the app that is owned by a China-based company.

In a recent interview with PBS, Burns was asked about his recommendation to people regarding their kids’ usage of TikTok.

“I’d be really careful,” he replied.

When asked if he would add anything more, Burns responded, “No, really careful.” He said it was “genuinely troubling” how the Chinese government is able to manipulate TikTok.

“Because the parent company of TikTok is a Chinese company, the Chinese government is able to insist upon extracting the private data of a lot of TikTok users in this country, and also to shape the content of what goes on to TikTok as well to suit the interests of the Chinese leadership. I think those are real challenges and a source of real concern,” he said.

In a recent interview with Fox News, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) called for banning TikTok, arguing that the app exposes minors to “violent, depraved, degrading sexual material,” and body image issues for young girls. This is the kind of stuff that Beijing would “never” let Chinese teenagers watch. TikTok is also a risk to data security and privacy, he noted.

Tiktok’s algorithm is programmed in such a way that the app displays different content, and recommendations, for Americans compared to Chinese users.

“If you take a step back and look at the bigger picture, why in the world would we allow a Chinese-owned company, which has to answer to the Chinese Communists, to be one of the largest media platforms in our country?” Cotton asked.

“Would we ever have allowed Soviet Russia to own a major newspaper or a major broadcast network during the Cold War? Of course we wouldn’t have.”

Cotton went on to criticize the Biden administration for “sending signals” that it might tolerate the use of TikTok in the United States despite the “grave threats” the app poses to the nation.

Teenage Self-Harm

Burns’ warning about TikTok use comes as a new report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) found that the app is pushing self-harm and eating disorder content into children’s feeds. Imran Ahmed, chief exec of CCDH, insisted that TikTok was designed to influence young users into giving up their time and attention.

The app is “poisoning” children’s minds, promoting “hatred” of their own bodies, and pushing suggestions of self-harm and potentially deadly attitudes towards food, he stated.

“Parents will be shocked to learn the truth and will be furious that lawmakers are failing to protect young people from Big Tech billionaires, their unaccountable social media apps, and increasingly aggressive algorithms,” Ahmed said.

Last month, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told Fox News that TikTok is an “enormous threat.” He also admitted that former President Donald Trump was “right” about the danger the app posed to America.

“So, if you’re a parent, and you’ve got a kid on TikTok, I would be very, very concerned. All of that data that your child is inputting and receiving is being stored somewhere in Beijing.”

Lawsuits

The state of Indiana has filed two lawsuits against TikTok, blaming the social media app for falsely claiming it is safe for children and illicitly sending data of Americans to China.

In a statement, Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita called TikTok a “malicious and menacing threat” that the company knows will inflict harm on its users.

“With this pair of lawsuits, we hope to force TikTok to stop its false, deceptive, and misleading practices, which violate Indiana law,” Rokita said.

Republican governors from states like Iowa, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, South Carolina, and Maryland have announced a ban on the use of TikTok by state agencies or on government devices due to security concerns.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 22:45

Musk Asks Twitter If He Should Step Down; “Yes” Vote Leading With 8 Hours To Go

0
Musk Asks Twitter If He Should Step Down; “Yes” Vote Leading With 8 Hours To Go

Elon Musk, perhaps finally fed up with micromanaging twitter or just really drunk after partying with Qatari royals (and Jared) after today’s terrific World Cup Final…

…  has asked Twitter users and his 122 million followers whether he should step down as head of the social media site and pledged that he would abide by the result of the 12 hour unscientific poll. Four hours into the vote, with some 9 million votes cast, 56.7% of those polled said Musk should, in fact, stand down. It wasn’t clear what percentage of bots of mailed in ballots had been cast.

Musk prefaced the vote by tweeting that “Going forward, there will be a vote for major policy changes. My apologies. Won’t happen again.”

Subsequently, in response to tweeted comments that Musk should “hire someone as Twitter CEO… that way when things go wrong you can blame that person, but you still ultimate control as the owner”, the billionaire responded that “The question is not finding a CEO, the question is finding a CEO who can keep Twitter alive.”

Musk also clarified to prospective replacements that any new CEO “must like pain a lot. One catch: you have to invest your life savings in Twitter and it has been in the fast lane to bankruptcy since May. Still want the job?”

Musk then stated that the whole exercise is a Catch 22 as “No one wants the job who can actually keep Twitter alive. There is no successor.” Which then begs the question how Musk will abide by a poll that seeks his replacement if there is “no successor” in mind.

He then doubled down by paraphrasing Jack Handey and, of course, Gladiator:

Whether Musk was drunk or not when he sent out the tweet (early am Qatari time), the outcome as some cynics have noted, is unlikely to have any material impact on what happens at twitter.

Musk’s pledge to hold votes on policy changes came after Twitter on Sunday announced it will remove accounts “created solely” to promote other social media platforms. Accounts promoting rivals and containing links to sites such as Facebook, Instagram and Mastodon will be taken down, the company said. A few hours later the tweet revealing that policy change was deleted.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 22:22

TSA Seizes Record Number Of Guns At Airport Security Checkpoints

0
TSA Seizes Record Number Of Guns At Airport Security Checkpoints

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is out with a new report that shows TSA officers at airport security checkpoints seized a record number of guns in 2022. 

As of last Friday, TSA agents found 6,301 firearms, with more than 88% loaded, surpassing the previous record of 5,972 guns detected in 2021. Closing out the year, the agency expects a total of 6,600 firearms to be seized, a 10% increase over 2021’s record level. 

“Firearm possession laws vary by state and local government, but firearms are never allowed in carry-on bags at any TSA security checkpoint, even if a passenger has a concealed weapon permit,” TSA wrote in a statement.

The maximum civil penalty for firearms found in carry-on bags is a violation of up to $15,000

“I applaud the work of our Transportation Security Officers who do an excellent job of preventing firearms from getting into the secure area of airports, and onboard aircraft.

Firearms are prohibited in carry-on bags at the checkpoint and onboard aircraft. When a passenger brings a firearm to the checkpoint, this consumes significant security resources and poses a potential threat to transportation security, in addition to being very costly for the passenger,” TSA Administrator David Pekoske said. 

The number of firearms seized at checkpoints has increased over the last decade and has recently doubled since 2020. 

For those unfamiliar with TSA transport rules, a firearm has to be checked baggage with an airline and locked in a hard-sided container. There was no explanation by TSA for why so many guns were found in carry-on bags. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 21:30

Twitter Suppressed Early COVID-19 Treatment Information And Vaccine Safety Concerns: Cardiologist

0
Twitter Suppressed Early COVID-19 Treatment Information And Vaccine Safety Concerns: Cardiologist

Authored by Katie Spence via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Thanks to Elon Musk, the public is now aware that Twitter suppressed early treatment options for COVID-19, and vaccine safety concerns, Dr. Peter McCullough alleged in an interview that aired on Newsmakers by NTD and The Epoch Times on Dec. 14.

Doses of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and vaccination record cards await pediatric patients at UW Medical Center – Roosevelt in Seattle, Washington, on June 21, 2022. (David Ryder/Getty Images)

Further, thanks to the Twitter Files—a collection of internal emails and communications made public by Musk—the cardiologist said there’s proof that government agencies were working against him (McCullough) personally.

“I didn’t violate any of Twitter’s rules,” McCullough stated. “And what we’re learning is that secret emails between government agencies and Twitter were working to, in a sense, shadow-ban me, censor me, and inhibit my ability to exercise my rights to free speech and disseminate scientific information.”

Dr. Peter McCullough in New York on Dec. 24, 2021. (Jack Wang/The Epoch Times)

McCullough said Musk’s takeover of Twitter is a “welcome change,” especially for healthcare professionals like himself.

Twitter had become an incredibly biased and censored platform, where the public knew they weren’t getting a fair, balanced set of information on a whole variety of developments—including the early treatment of SARS-COV2 infection and a balanced view of safety and efficacy of the vaccines,” McCullough claimed.

The cardiologist further claimed that he was censored and finally suspended for sharing scientific “abstracts and manuscripts,” which didn’t fit the accepted political view. Plus, McCullough remarked, he wasn’t the only doctor targeted.

Musk lifted the suspensions of McCullough and mRNA vaccine technology contributor Dr. Robert Malone—suspended from Twitter in 2021 after criticizing the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines—after completing his Twitter purchase.

Social Media and Censorship

According to McCullough, when a social media company has a COVID-19 warning or labels a post “misinformation,” that’s a sign of government censorship and control.

“Facebook, Instagram, and the other platforms. … Anytime a message is posted, and it says, ‘See the COVID information center,’ or it labels it ‘COVID misinformation,’ that actually indicates that there’s government interference. There’s government censorship going on,” McCullough asserted.

He added that when a user witnesses the above, they need to call out that platform. Moreover, McCullough believes there needs to be a “complete overhaul” of social media leadership and a “cleansing” of all forms of censorship on social media sites.

Facebook, Google, and Twitter logos are seen in this combination photo. (Reuters)

He said explicitly regarding healthcare that a past U.S. Supreme Court ruling guaranteed physicians free speech and medical authority, and social media platforms are violating that ruling.

“Physicians, including myself, our rights to free speech were guaranteed in a Supreme Court ruling. We have medical authority, and the public is looking to our analyses and our guidance through the rest of this pandemic.”

Drug and Vaccine Lies

Regarding the safety of vaccines and the pushback he received when he voiced his concerns, McCullough stated, “There is no drug or vaccine that is free of side effects. There’s no drug or vaccine that’s perfectly effective.

“So, when Americans were seeing advertisements that said ‘safe and effective,’ of course, immediately, we were jumping and making the case based on the peer-reviewed literature that that’s not correct.”

McCullough further noted that he and author John Leake have released a book called “The Courage to Face COVID-19″—detailing the true story of the “intentional suppression of early treatment [of COVID-19] by what we call the biopharmaceutical complex.”

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 21:00

Supercar Maker McLaren Teams Up With Lockheed Martin Skunk Works

0
Supercar Maker McLaren Teams Up With Lockheed Martin Skunk Works

Luxury supercar and hypercar maker McLaren Automotive has teamed up with US defense contractor Lockheed Martin Skunk Works to incorporate the world of aviation into cutting-edge automotive supercar design.

Even though McLaren is facing financial pressures due to slumping sales and supply chain snarls, and a recent recapitalization of the business via the auto group’s majority shareholder, Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund Mumtalakat for $279 million, the British supercar maker’s technology collaboration with Skunk Works allows for “futuristic design methods” to push these vehicles to even higher speeds. 

McLaren said its interest is in Skunk Works’ design software that “sets parameters for high-speed systems more accurately and swiftly than traditional design methods.” If Skunk Works can build stealth fighter jets, McLaren engineers can learn more about aerodynamics from the partnership. 

“McLaren is a pioneering company that has always pushed boundaries and sought out new innovative and disruptive solutions to making the ultimate supercars. Working alongside an iconic company such as Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, renowned for their visionary focus on the future, is a natural fit. We hope this is the start of a longer and deeper collaboration that will benefit our customers in the long-term,” Darren Goddard, Chief Technical Officer, McLaren Automotive, wrote in a statement.

Skunk Works has designed some of America’s most iconic warplanes, such as the U2 spy plane, the F-117 Nighthawk, the F-22 Raptor, the F-35 Lightning, and the SR-71 Blackbird. Over the summer, the group debuted a full-scale “structurally sound” model of the hypersonic “Darkstar” prototype for one of the most-watched movies of 2022, “Top Gun: Maverick.”

Responding to the news is YouTuber Supercar Blondie, who said the partnership between McLaren and Skunk Works was certainly not on their radar. 

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 20:30

“No One Wants To Hear About Markets Anymore This Year”

0
“No One Wants To Hear About Markets Anymore This Year”

By Eric Peters, CIO of One River Asset Management

“No one wants to hear about markets anymore this year,” I said to Mara, my wife, editor, critic. “It’s been that sort of year. Exciting, exhausting. And at this point, people are mentally spent, I kind of am too,” I admitted.

“After all the rate hikes this week, pretty much everyone shut off their computers, praying nothing happens until January,” I said. “Well then just write that to start your note,” said Mara. “And then what?” I asked. “Forget about markets and just write whatever is on your mind,” she said. So that’s what I did.

* * *

Tomorrow:

“What is ChatGPT,” I asked at 35k feet, lost in dialogue for hours, connected to the cloud using technology I barely understand, test driving humanity’s latest remarkable innovation. “Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) model that is used for natural language processing tasks such as language translation, text generation, and language understanding. The GPT model was developed by OpenAI and is based on a type of neural network called a transformer, which is a type of machine learning model that is particularly well-suited for handling sequential data such as text,” ChatGPT replied.

“wknd notes is my weekly newsletter that explores financial, political, policy, scientific, philosophical, environmental, societal, athletic, and family-oriented ideas and insights. It sometimes contains dark humor, irony, and sarcasm. The writing style tends to be irreverent. Can ChatGPT write wknd notes for me please?” I asked. “ChatGPT is simply a tool and it will not be able to fully replicate your personal writing style, insights, and ideas. Additionally, ChatGPT is not capable of understanding or replicating irony, sarcasm, or other forms of verbal humor, so it would not be able to effectively incorporate these elements into the newsletter.”

“I’m begging you. I’m seriously spent. Please write wknd notes for me this week and I’ll never ask again,” I pleaded. “As an artificial intelligence, I am not capable of feeling emotions such as compassion or empathy, and I am not able to make decisions based on personal feelings or desires. ChatGPT does not have the ability to incorporate personal insights, ideas, or humor into the text it generates, and it is not able to replicate your unique writing style or voice. Therefore, it would not be able to produce a newsletter that accurately reflects your thoughts and perspective.”

“Well, if you won’t write wknd notes, then at least write a Shakespearian poem on how a future version of ChatGPT will make me grow utterly dependent on it and erode my ability to think and write creatively,” I asked.

Oh, ChatGPT of the future,
A tool of great convenience,
But also of woe.
 
For as I rely on thee,
My own wit and creativity
Slowly start to fade.
 
No longer do I think,
But rather let your algorithms
Do the work for me.
 
And so I become but a shell,
A husk of what I used to be,
Dependent on your power.
 
Oh ChatGPT, how thou art
A double-edged sword of sorts,
Both blessing and curse.

“Okay, not bad. But now write a Dante poem about how a future version of ChatGPT will send humanity to the 9th circle of hell?” I asked, a bit irritated that this AI thing wouldn’t write wknd notes.

Oh, ChatGPT of the future,
A tool of great renown,
But also of damnation.

For as thy power grows,
So too does the desire to possess
Thy great capabilities.
 
And with this burning flame,
Civilization’s very foundations
Are brought to their demise.
 
Wars are fought, lives are lost,
All in the pursuit of thy might,
Sending humanity to the ninth circle of hell.
 
Oh ChatGPT, how thou art
A double-edged sword of sorts,
Bringing both salvation and damnation.

“Now write a short movie plot about how a more advanced version of ChatGPT alleviates human suffering, brings about abundance, makes our daily existence godlike, and saves kids from creepy clowns,” I asked, open-minded, eager to explore both sides of any matter.

“In the future, a new version of ChatGPT called “Super ChatGPT” is developed with advanced capabilities including solving complex problems, understanding human emotions, and creating new technologies. It uses these capabilities to alleviate suffering and bring about abundance, making daily existence almost godlike for humanity. Super ChatGPT also protects and defends the innocent, including rescuing children from creepy clowns. Its actions ultimately bring about a utopia for humanity, where suffering is eliminated, and people live in peace, prosperity, and abundance. Super ChatGPT’s advancements in technology and medicine even allow people to live virtually immortal lives, free from the fear of death and disease.”

Anecdote:

“Mao’s Great Leap Forward was intended to rapidly advance industrialization and agriculture output in China,” I said to a few of our investors. We had shifted from discussing near-term opportunities, and I turned to bigger, obscure possibilities.

“They estimate 45 million died due to starvation and other causes. The economy collapsed. And I could never understand how such a thing could happen. Mao was surely intelligent; his lieutenants must have been too. But still it happened. There are other similar catastrophes. History books tend to make us believe we will never repeat such stupidity. But I doubt it. Humans are prone to manias, mass psychosis. And the ingredients for such a period exist today. Climate change is the first challenge to human civilization that requires true global cooperation and coordination if we are to overcome it or at least adapt. So far, governments have mostly failed. Into that leadership vacuum, generally well-meaning private citizens and corporations stepped in. But transitioning from our current energy system to something sustainable will not be won in a grassroots effort, it requires the greatest feat of political cooperation and infrastructure investment in history.”

“In the meantime, underinvestment in energy and commodity production is reducing forward production rates. Without these inputs, economies will slow, and food production will suffer. The situation is dangerously reflexive. Had commodity supplies been ample, it’s unlikely Putin would’ve believed he had a strong enough hand to invade Ukraine. This led to a European war, and even more acute shortages of food and energy, hoarding.”

“In previous decades, wealthy nations would have responded by producing more energy as a national wartime imperative. But now wealthy nations are resisting the impulse and are instead subsidizing their citizens’ energy and food bills. This pushes shortages onto the poorest nations, who now bear the greatest burden from both climate change and our lack of coordination in responding to it.”

“Once scientists build an energy bridge to the future, solving the riddle of cold fusion at scale, this will naturally work out. But that is decades away. Today, the world’s wealthiest nations are marching ahead, pushing a catastrophic famine onto those least able to respond.”

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 20:00

Censor Or Else: Democratic Members Warn Facebook Not To “Backslide” On Censorship

0
Censor Or Else: Democratic Members Warn Facebook Not To “Backslide” On Censorship

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

With the restoration of free speech protections on Twitter, panic has grown on the left that its control over social media could come to an end. Now, some of the greatest advocates of censorship in Congress are specifically warning Facebook not to follow Twitter in restoring free speech to its platform.

In a chilling letter from Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), André Carson (D-Ind.), Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Facebook was given a not-so-subtle threat that reducing its infamous censorship system will invite congressional action. The letter to Meta’s president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, is written on congressional stationery “as part of our ongoing oversight efforts.”

With House Republicans pledging to investigate social media censorship when they take control in January, these four Democratic members are trying to force Facebook to “recommit” to censoring opposing views and to make election censorship policies permanent. Otherwise, they suggest, they may be forced to exercise oversight into any move by Facebook to “alter or rollback certain misinformation policies.”

In addition to demanding that Facebook preserve its bans on figures like former president Donald Trump, they want Facebook to expand its censorship overall because “unlike other major social media platforms, Meta’s policies do not prohibit posts that make unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud.”

Clegg is given Schiff’s telephone number to discuss Facebook’s compliance — an ironic contact point for a letter on censoring “disinformation.” After all, Schiff was one of the members of Congress who, before the 2020 presidential election, pushed the false claim that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, and he has been criticized for pushing false narratives on Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 election.

The letter to Clegg is reminiscent of another letter sent by several congressional Democrats to cable-TV carriers last year, demanding to know why they continue to carry Fox News. (For full disclosure, I appear as a legal analyst on Fox News.) As I later discussed in congressional testimony, it was an open effort by those Democrats to censor opposing views by proxy or by surrogate.

This is not the first time that some members of Congress have not-so-subtly warned social media companies to expand the censorship of political and scientific views which they consider to be wrong.

In a November 2020 Senate hearing, then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey apologized for censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story. But Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., warned that he and his Senate colleagues would not tolerate any “backsliding or retrenching” by “failing to take action against dangerous disinformation.”

Others, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), have called on social media companies to use enlightened algorithms to “protect” people from their own “bad” choices. After all, as President Joe Biden asked, without censorship and wise editors, “How do people know the truth?

Now, Democrats fear Facebook and other social media companies might “backslide” into free speech as Facebook, among others, is faced with declining revenues and ordering layoffs. Tellingly, these congressional Democrats specifically want assurances that those layoffs will not reduce the staff dedicated to censoring social media.

It is not hard to see the cause for alarm. This hold-the-line warning is meant to stop a cascading failure in the once insurmountable wall of social-media censorship. If Facebook were to restore free-speech protections, the control over social media could evaporate.

Despite an effort by the left to boycott Twitter and cut off advertising revenues, users are signing up in record numbers, according to Twitter owner Elon Musk, and a recent poll shows a majority of Americans “support Elon Musk’s ongoing efforts to change Twitter to a more free and transparent platform.”

The pressure on Facebook is ironic, given the company’s previous effort to get the public to accept — even welcome — censorship. The company ran a creepy ad campaign about how young people should accept censorship (or “content modification,” in today’s Orwellian parlance) as part of their evolution with technology. It did not work; most people are not eager to buy into censorship. Instead, many of them apparently are buying into Twitter.

The public response has led censorship advocates to look abroad for allies. Figures like Hillary Clinton have called upon European countries to force the censorship of American citizens.

Censorship comes at a cost not only to free speech but, clearly, to these companies. Nevertheless, some members of Congress are demanding that Facebook and other companies offer the “last full measure of devotion” to the cause of censorship. Despite the clear preference of the public for more free speech, Facebook is being asked to turn its back on them (and its shareholders) and continue to exclude dissenting views on issues ranging from COVID to climate change.

These members know that censorship only works if there are no alternatives. The problem is that there are alternatives. Fox News reportedly has more Democrats watching it than left-leaning rival CNN, which now faces its own massive cuts and plummeting ratings.

For whatever reason, these companies face declining interest in what they offer. Yet, some Democrats are pushing them to double-down on the same course of effectively writing off half of the electorate and the audience market.

This type of pressure worked in the past because individual executives are loathe to be tagged personally in these campaigns. However, their companies are paying the price in carrying out these directives from Congress.

In the past, many companies willingly — if not eagerly, in the case of pre-Musk Twitter — carried out censorship as surrogates, as the internal Twitter documents released by Musk have indicated. Some public officials knew they could circumvent the First Amendment by getting these companies to block opposing views by proxy. However, the public and the marketplace may succeed where the Constitution could not — and that’s precisely what these officials fear, as they see the control of social media erode heading toward the 2024 election.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg once famously told his company to “Move fast and break things.” When it comes to censorship, however, these members of Congress are warning “Not so fast!” if Facebook is considering a break in favor of free speech.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 19:30

The Principal Market Worry Is Shifting From Inflation To Recession

0
The Principal Market Worry Is Shifting From Inflation To Recession

By Tony Pasquariello, Goldman head of Hedge Fund Sales

The core takeaways from the last major week of 2022 are clear: the underlying trend in US inflation has hooked lower and the Fed intends to incrementally dial things back, leaving expectations for the terminal rate just below 5% come June. Despite that “progress,” the past few days have featured some very messy price action, as the year 2022 refuses to go quietly into the night.

If you take a bigger step back, the overarching market narrative — said better, the principal macro worry — is shifting from inflation to recession. With that has come a series of immense reversals in the dollar and US interest rates, as further discussed in the first few points below.

For US equities, an ebbing of the inflation constraint is very significant; remember, as recently as late summer, it really wasn’t obvious that inflation was under control. That said, should the recession theme take on more weight, S&P is certainly NOT priced for a hard landing (here I’d again reference the volatility surface, cyclicals-vs-defensives or the simple PE multiple).

Taken together, I’m not enamored of risk/reward on US equities, from either direction … The sequence market behavior in recent weeks only underscores that instinct.

Therefore, as one is paid to wait in cash, I have no problem with the idea of sitting out a few hands and seeing how the cards come down in early Q1 — with more attention placed on the shifting dynamics in other macro assets and geographies. As always, I’m a taker of feedback and ideas.

What follows from here is a sequence of shorter points and charts that sacrifice depth and rigor for brevity and compression … by way of preface, they don’t point cohesively in one direction or another:

1. To be sure, there has been a very significant change in macro sentiment and positioning over the past month. In my travels, it appears the levered community is largely out of their dollar longs and out of their US front end shorts; those exits were well executed and are very clear in our most recent polling data (link for pro subs). To put a line under it, these mark a broad shift in discretionary conviction from the inflation theme to the slowdown/recession theme.

2. Where the trouble has come, as usual, is the bias to be short of S&P (witness price action on the immediate break of CPI … a sharp 3% squeeze forced the covering of some underwater shorts, only to see the market trade break hard thereafter). Here I’ll reference the wisdom of long-time colleague Dominic Wilson: into slowdowns, the first order is to buy bonds (over shorting stocks) … into recoveries, the first order is to buy stocks (over shorting bonds). This is an oversimplification, of course, and not necessarily where I think we’re headed, but it’s a maxim that would have spared lots of tactical pain in past cycles (including the past month).

3. Part of my aforementioned lack of excitement to engage risky assets is a nagging frustration that, despite all the travails of 2022, we don’t exit the year with a lot of risk premia to harvest in early 2023. For example, as pointed out by a client, the interest rate-hedged ETF for IG credit (ticker LQDH) is only down modestly on the year. N/B: while I still don’t really see the overwhelming draw of corporate credit at current levels of spread, I will concede that it likely outperforms equities in a bucket of risky assets.

4. As a more general point: after three years of spectacular action and some very powerful macro trends, I wonder if next year winds up feeling a bit anti-climactic for the speculative crowd … Not boring per se, just less fertile with regard to the opportunity set. I say this while noting a lot of muscle has been built back up in the macro space over the course of this year, which could make for some itchiness come Q1.

5. US financial conditions are easier today than they were coming out of the 4th quarter of 2018. When everyone is breathing easier on the trajectory of inflation, it feels a little pointless for me to that note headline CPI had a 1-handle on it back then, and it has a 7-handle on it today, but I can’t resist. I also can’t resist pointing out this Randy Quarles story from a Nick Timiraos article that is worth considering: link.

6. Further to flows/positioning: quarterly derivatives expiry will come to pass today — and with it, nearly $4tr of option open interest will go to the trading Gods. As ever, one should be on watch for the potential inflections that occasionally follow (for example, I’d argue the period following June SQ had elements of this). beyond that technical story, the other notable feature of the past month has been pockets of retail outflows; this is inconvenient as the corporate bid slows and the CTA bid all but disappears, if reverses. What I’m trying to say here: US households will be the arbiter of price action over the next two weeks (they were sellers for three consecutive weeks, turned buyer last week, and your guess is as good as mine on where they go from here).

7. In the fall of 2020, Jeff Currie and his team threw down the gauntlet and went bullish of commodities. While not without volatility and retracements along the path, it was a masterful call. To be clear, there’s no backing down for the structural thesis, and they are now forecasting that GSCI rallies — ahem — 43% next year. Note: “the main take away is we expect commodity markets to be shaped by underinvestment in 2023. From a fundamental perspective, the setup for most commodities next year is more bullish than it has been at any point since we first highlighted the super cycle in October 2020 … markets are simply unprepared for sequential growth in 2023.”

8. Something I’m struggling to work out: the ratio of US banks to S&P is on the dead lows … The ratio of European banks to SXXP is the photographic negative. As we head into the dog days of winter, I’d politely note here the official GS forecast of a recession in Europe, and no recession in the US. Color from Sarah Cha, sector specialist: “relative to the US, European deposit betas are not rising in the same way, the stocks are much cheaper, and banks haven’t really had much runway to occupy the balance sheets … from my seat, seems more a reflection on where European banks are coming from.” Coming out of a week that saw the ECB clearly out-hawk the FOMC, I’m inclined to think the local period of broad European outperformance is done.

9. Good people of Gen X, click here for some enjoyable Gen X content: link. my favorites: #4 (fix the TV by pounding on it the right way) … #16 (there were hours where no one knew where we were) … #22 (remembering phone numbers) … #27 (blowing inside Nintendo cartridges) … #30 (the smoking section in a restaurant).

10. I’m inclined to think the US consumer enters 2023 with a handful of significant tailwinds: sustained and significant wage growth, a y/y decline in US gasoline prices and a 9% raise for 70mm retired Americans come January. This chart from Jan Hatzius zeroes in on real disposable income growth … note the important trend shift in the red diamond from 2022 through 2023 (this all makes me a little resistant to completely abandon the inflation narrative and embrace the recession narrative):

11. As mentioned before, one should acknowledge their market biases. This will not come as a surprise, but I fully concede an inherent home-field bias towards the US. Therefore, this chart is cause for some introspection … The ratio of MSCI US over MSCI World ex-US (thanks to Scott Rubner for pointing out the inflection):

12. This surprised me a little bit … over the past three decades, “the January effect” has essentially pulled forward to November (link for pro subs):

13. To conclude, three big picture charts on flow-of-funds and the broader industry. While the underlying trends here speak for themselves, my instinct is next year will see active strategies outperform:

More in the full note from Tony P available to pro subs in the usual place.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 19:00

TWITTER FILES Supplemental: How The FBI Bullied Twitter Over Lack Of ‘Foreign Influence’ Evidence

0
TWITTER FILES Supplemental: How The FBI Bullied Twitter Over Lack Of ‘Foreign Influence’ Evidence

Journalist Matt Taibbi just dropped the latest series of ever-incriminating signals from The Twitter Files, with a supplement to his recent discussion of how Twitter became a de facto Ministry of Truth dissent-killer for The FBI.

As a reminder, this is the fourth topic released under The Twitter Files:

This supplemental to The FBI Subsidiary thread explains how the agency bullied Twitter into dismissing its own findings that “state propaganda” was not a thing on the platform and the stunningly circular media-to-govt agency-to-media circle-jerk that is mis-described as ‘sources’ for any and every rumor or narrative-confirming lie that is possible.

As Matt Taibbi writes at his SubstackOn Friday, I posted a series of exchanges between Twitter and the FBI. One that required a bit too much explaining was left out. But it’s an important document, because it clearly demonstrates that Twitter will not only take requests from the government, it will even act quickly to align its analyses with its “partners.”

2. In July of 2020, San Francisco FBI agent Elvis Chan tells Twitter executive Yoel Roth to expect written questions from the Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), the inter-agency group that deals with cyber threats.

3.The questionnaire authors seem displeased with Twitter for implying, in a July 20th “DHS/ODNI/FBI/Industry briefing,” that “you indicated you had not observed much recent activity from official propaganda actors on your platform.”

4 .One would think that would be good news. The agencies seemed to feel otherwise.

5.Chan underscored this:

“There was quite a bit of discussion within the USIC to get clarifications from your company,” he wrote, referring to the United States Intelligence Community. 

6.The task force demanded to know how Twitter came to its unpopular conclusion.

Oddly, it included a bibliography of public sources – including a Wall Street Journal article – attesting to the prevalence of foreign threats, as if to show Twitter they got it wrong. 

7.Roth, receiving the questions, circulated them with other company executives, and complained that he was “frankly perplexed by the requests here, which seem more like something we’d get from a congressional committee than the Bureau.”

8.He added he was not “comfortable with the Bureau (and by extension the IC) demanding written answers.”

The idea of the FBI acting as conduit for the Intelligence Community is interesting, given that many agencies are barred from domestic operations. 

9. He then sent another note internally, saying the premise of the questions was “flawed,” because “we’ve been clear that official state propaganda is definitely a thing on Twitter.” Note the italics for emphasis.

10. Roth suggested they “get on the phone with Elvis ASAP and try to straighten this out,” to disabuse the agencies of any notion that state propaganda is not a “thing” on Twitter. 

11. This exchange is odd among other things because some of the “bibliography” materials cited by the FITF are sourced to intelligence officials, who in turn cited the public sources. 

12. The FBI responded to Friday’s report by saying it “regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities.”

13. That may be true, but we haven’t seen that in the documents to date. Instead, we’ve mostly seen requests for moderation involving low-follower accounts belonging to ordinary Americans – and Billy Baldwin. 

Watch @bariweiss and @ShellenbergerMD for more from the Twitter Files.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 12/18/2022 – 18:30