55.5 F
Chicago
Saturday, October 3, 2026
Home Blog Page 32

Gamma Squeeze The World

0
Gamma Squeeze The World

 Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

A little over a week ago, I wrote about Leopold Aschenbrenner returning to markets, and the ensuing nausea the entire spectacle caused me.

For those who missed it, Aschenbrenner’s Situational Awareness fund had grown to roughly $45 billion before getting absolutely smoked in July, falling toward $10 billion and forcing the liquidation of most of its public equity portfolio to Darth Griffin over at Citadel. Then, barely six weeks later, CNBC reported that Situational Awareness was back, this time buying options tied to AMD, Bloom Energy, CoreWeave, SK Hynix, SanDisk and the Roundhill Memory ETF.

The media slobbered over these options buys like it wasn’t the exact same thing a million 19 year olds do on their Robinhood app and post to r/WallStreetBets every day.

In my piece, I noted that maybe Aschenbrenner really is brilliant about AI, but understanding scaling laws and compute doesn’t automatically make somebody a great portfolio manager. His previous strategy looked to me like nothing more than an enormously concentrated, leveraged bet on the hottest momentum trade on Earth, one that generated spectacular returns right up until it imploded into itself like a dying star.

Today let’s add another piece to the puzzle. For years I’ve argued that the modern stock market increasingly resembles a gigantic mechanical contraption driven primarily by passive flows, options positioning, dealer hedging and gamma. The marginal price of a stock isn’t necessarily being set by some guy with a green visor carefully discounting the next 20 years of cash flows.

Increasingly, instead, it can be set by flows interacting with flows interacting with algorithms, while CNBC brings on an analyst afterward to explain why it was actually because Jensen Huang signed some nubile Taiwanese woman’s tit at a tech conference in Asia that week.

And ever since GameStop, I’ve wondered, and I want to emphasize that this is my speculation, not something I can prove, how often enormous options purchases are being used to manufacture or accelerate momentum underneath the surface of the market. I’ve asked this question specifically related to the NASDAQ and Tesla multiple times, dating back to the early 2020s.

Archegos’ Bill Hwang, for example, used highly leveraged derivatives to create massive synthetic exposure, whose buying pressure pushed stocks higher, increased his collateral and borrowing capacity, and funded even more derivative exposure, creating a self-reinforcing feedback loop. Until it all went to shit.

Buy enough calls and somebody has to sell them to you. Depending on how dealers are positioned, those dealers may hedge by buying the underlying stock. If the stock rises, the delta of the calls can rise with it, requiring additional hedging. Momentum strategies notice the move. Humans see a chart going vertical and pile in. Suddenly you have a feedback loop.

Which brings us to yesterday. Literally hours after the Federal Reserve raised rates 25 basis points to 3.75% to 4.00% on the largest debt bubble in history, its first hike in three years, the Nasdaq Composite exploded almost 3% higher.

Sure. Why not? There were legitimate explanations offered for the rally. Treasury yields declined, oil fell and enthusiasm around AI came roaring back. Fine.

But the timing caught my attention because shortly before this move, Situational Awareness had reportedly returned to the options market buying exposure to precisely the kind of AI, semiconductor and memory names capable of lighting up the Nasdaq.

So it was easy to ask: is Leopold responsible for Monday’s rally? Was it nothing more than a gamma squeeze? I have absolutely no idea. And neither does anybody else without seeing the complete positioning and dealer books. But facts have started to leak out. For example, Zero Hedge noted it was META’s highest call volume on record yesterday:

But the circumstantial setup is interesting enough that I’m paying attention. It also fits the same suspicion I’ve had about this market for years: what looks like fundamental price discovery may sometimes be something considerably more mechanical.

And one of the stranger things about Monday was volatility. Normally a violent equity rally is associated with falling implied volatility. When stocks and implied volatility rise together, however, it can indicate unusually strong demand for optionality, including upside calls, rather than the familiar slow risk on grind.

That doesn’t prove a gamma squeeze and it doesn’t prove manipulation. But it makes me less inclined to look at a giant green Nasdaq candle and conclude that millions of investors independently woke up Monday morning, opened their discounted cash flow models and simultaneously discovered that stocks were worth 2.3% more.

I’ve said for years that I think the market is, in a colloquial sense, rigged. I don’t mean somebody is sitting in a smoke filled room deciding where the Nasdaq closes. I mean the structure of modern markets can create enormous self reinforcing moves that have very little to do with the fundamental value of the underlying businesses. (Read: What If The Automatic Stock Buying Stops?)

And reflexivity works both ways. The same machinery capable of turning call buying, dealer hedging and momentum into a face ripping rally can amplify the move when everybody heads for the other side of the boat.


🔥 85% OFF FOREVER IF YOU SUBSCRIBE TODAY: I am again offering an 85% discount to anyone that wants to become a Fringe Finance annual subscriber today. It’s a discount you can keep and stays applied for as long as you wish to remain a subscriber: Get 85% off forever


None of this changes my broader thesis. I still think the AI bubble is likely to crack within the next six to ten months. Monday doesn’t change that view one bit.

You can gamma squeeze stocks. You can buy calls. You can trigger systematic flows. You can squeeze shorts and chase indexes higher. What you cannot do indefinitely is repeal mathematics.

The risk free rate is around 4%. The Fed just raised rates. Capital has a real cost again. Inflation remains elevated. Those realities eventually matter to companies whose valuations depend on enormous amounts of capital spending and profits stretching years into the future.

I continue to think we’re eventually headed toward a powerful deflationary impulse as this cycle breaks. If I’m right, all of this options driven gamesmanship will eventually look like a sideshow.

Oh and one last thing. Watching Aschenbrenner’s enormous concentrated bets, spectacular rise, violent drawdown and rapid return to leveraged instruments gives me Bill Hwang vibes. To be crystal clear, I am not accusing Aschenbrenner of fraud, illegal manipulation or any of the conduct associated with Hwang. I’m talking strictly about the market dynamic: enormous concentration, leverage, extraordinary mark to market gains, sudden losses and the possibility that positioning itself becomes meaningful to the prices of the securities involved.

The analogy ends there.

My warning to subscribers remains the same: do not confuse the price blinking on your screen with some immutable statement about economic reality.

This isn’t the stock market of the 1980s or 1990s. We now have zero day options, enormous passive vehicles, algorithmic strategies, volatility products, dealer gamma hedging and trillions of dollars responding mechanically to price.

After more than a decade of zero rates, QE and monetary intervention, I increasingly think we’re staring at a financial mirage, a fiat driven, QE induced hallucination where price temporarily becomes its own justification.

Nothing feels particularly real anymore.

But that’s the funny thing about a mirage, it all looks perfectly real right up until you try to drink the water.

—

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 11:40

Socialist Candidate Says Stealing From Taxpayers Makes Her “More Qualified” For Office

0
Socialist Candidate Says Stealing From Taxpayers Makes Her “More Qualified” For Office

It sounds crazy, but this kind of scenario is absolutely the norm for Democratic Socialist candidates:  Being convicted of blatant criminal embezzlement is a badge of honor, not a disqualifying mark on their record.  The complete inversion of moral standards is unsettling and it reinforces the need to prevent far-left activists from entering positions of local government.

Denver mayoral candidate, Shontel Lewis, stole thousands of dollars in EBT funds while working in the state food-stamp office in 2008.  She says that the experience actually makes her “more qualified” for the job of mayor, ostensibly because this makes her more attuned to the needs of “struggling Denver citizens”.  

But maybe struggling Denver citizens should not be the deciding factor in who runs the city?  Perhaps electing a thief to office will make their lives worse, not better.

Investigators identified seven benefit accounts Lewis accessed over five months while working at the state food-stamp office. She reissued EBT cards from other people’s accounts and gave the funds to her roommate (and used some herself). She originally faced felony charges, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor theft, served 18 months of probation, and later said she paid restitution in full.    

Colorado’s constitution restricts anyone convicted of “embezzlement of public moneys, bribery, perjury, solicitation of bribery, or subornation of perjury” from holding “any office of trust or profit in the state.”  However, Lewis has been snaking past these rules for years.  Similar concerns were raised when she ran for the Regional Transportation District board in 2018.  

At that time she lawyered up and successfully obtained a position on the board from 2019 to 2022.  Keep in mind, Colorado is a deep blue state run by progressive fanatics, and this was the era of DEI and BLM supremacy.  Lewis has continually blamed her circumstances for the theft, claiming she was spurred on by “trauma”.

“I believe my eligibility should be based on the voters, not on a series of poor decisions I made over a decade ago at a time of trauma in my life,” she said in a statement to The Colorado Sun. 

Lewis is now a member of the City Council.

This is a typical strategy for leftists, apologizing for a crime while not truly taking accountability and blaming circumstances.  Millions of people go through “trauma” and hardship everyday, and they don’t steal.  The fact that the thefts occurred while Lewis was working in a state office makes her continued presence in government all the more concerning.  She used her trusted position to gain access more easily. 

Her theft record and socialist politics also bring up the question of how she will handle crime in Denver? 

Lewis talked in circles when asked whether she would defund the police to pay for pricey proposals like youth programming and city-owned affordable housing. She criticized the cuts Denver mayor Mike Johnston made to a wide range of services to bridge a $200 million deficit in the latest budget, cuts she said could have come from the Denver Police Department (DPD). 

“Yes, cuts did need to be made, but I think there’s an opportunity for us to always prioritize the people when we’re talking about our budgets….We missed an opportunity to go back to those that were represented with DPD, with our Department of Safety, where we didn’t actually see any cuts coming from the department.”

Typically, far-left politicians refuse to enforce prosecution standards and tend to impede law enforcement operations at every turn.  In some cases, these city leaders have even been caught manipulating stats in order to hide rising crime.  They don’t have to commit crime themselves; all they have to do is make crime easier for other miscreants. 

It’s not surprising that many socialist candidates tend to come from the national underbelly – DSA and their Democrat allies openly celebrate criminality as a lifestyle choice, and view morality as purely relative.        

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 11:20

Watch Live: Trump Takes Global Stage At UN To Declare He Is ‘Reshaping The World’

0
Watch Live: Trump Takes Global Stage At UN To Declare He Is ‘Reshaping The World’

President Donald Trump is set to deliver a highly anticipated speech to the United Nations General Assembly today, set for 9:55 Eastern Time, or around 10am. He’s expected to address the Iran war and the “importance of ensuring that Iran never has a nuclear weapon” – according to UN Ambassador Mike Waltz, along with a other foreign policy issues like his 20-point peace plan in Gaza, as well as recent US actions closer to home in the Western Hemisphere.

Watch Live:

High on everyone’s mind is whether the US will engage in direct diplomacy with the Iranians on the UNGA sidelines.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the White House remains open to this.

“We’re open to that. I don’t think anything is scheduled at this point, but we’re certainly open to something like that, especially if it has the prospects of leading to something positive and ultimately achieving the goal of what this is all about,” Rubio told NBC’s :Today” show Tuesday morning.

“And that is the fact that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. They just simply can’t.”

A senior White House official has further previewed of Trump’s speech: “He’ll include many of the issues, frankly neglected by past administrations, that he’s not going to kick the can on.” From there and intense, meeting-packed day will ensue, starting with:

Following his speech, Trump will join a signing ceremony with the leaders of Greenland and Denmark on an agreement that the president touted as giving the U.S. “total control” over the Arctic island’s security. Greenland and Denmark, which owns the self-governed island, framed the agreement as strengthening security and said they will need to have their parliaments ratify the terms before it goes into effect.

According to White House and UN previews of Trump’s busy schedule, a series of bilateral meetings will ensue:

  • First bilateral meeting: Face-to-face meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

  • Second bilateral meeting: A “fulsome” meeting with Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.

  • Third meeting: A discussion with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

  • Special event: Participation in the “Shield of the Americas” event with Latin American leaders.

More on anticipated Trump talking points:

Another key meeting to be held on the sidelines will be crucial direct engagement with officials from Washington’s Gulf allies, at a moment of deep wartime uncertainty lingering over the whole region. Trump has warned he could starting hitting Iran again, or else strike a deal “at any time”.

Investors will be keeping an eye on US President Donald Trump’s address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Tuesday, as well as his meeting with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping later in the week. Beijing is expected to offer additional rare earth export licenses as a bargaining chip at the summit, Bloomberg News reported.

Gulf leaders are also anxious over the expanding war with the Houthis in Yemen. The Saudi coalition has over the last two weeks been beaten back rapidly, impacting overland oil transit – particularly after the East-West pipeline was hit in a drone attack – and Riyadh is looking for urgent military help from its partners. So far Trump has resisted directly joining the expanded conflict.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 09:45

Saudis Signal Red Sea Oil Loadings Could Soon Resume For Asian Buyers

0
Saudis Signal Red Sea Oil Loadings Could Soon Resume For Asian Buyers

Bloomberg reports Saudi Aramco may restart crude loadings at Yanbu this week, raising hopes that the critical East-West pipeline route, which bypasses the Strait of Hormuz, could resume operations at half capacity after a drone attack disabled it.

While no restart timeline has been confirmed, the overnight development adds to positive signs of progress toward resolving the global energy crisis after Brent slipped below $100 a barrel on reports that Iran offered to reopen the strait in exchange for an easing of US naval pressure and the US blockade of Iranian ports.

However, Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency has denied reports from Kyodo and Reuters about reopening Hormuz, calling them “invalid and untrue.”

The report also said Aramco executives told at least three Asian refiners they could soon resume picking up crude at Yanbu on the Red Sea.

Loadings at the Red Sea port have been halted since drone attacks launched from Iraq struck an East-West pipeline pumping station on September 10. The route had been carrying about 4 million barrels a day, providing Saudi Arabia with a valuable bypass around the Hormuz chokepoint.

Some Asian and European buyers have already missed their loading dates, leaving vessels near Yanbu or still heading toward the port. The Saudis have ramped up crude tanker transits from Ras Tanura through Hormuz, with cargoes available for ship-to-ship transfers in the Gulf of Oman.

Despite this morning’s encouraging reports, Barclays analyst Amarpreet Singh warned that Brent prices may need to climb another 50% to bring supply and demand into balance if current disruptions persist.

Inventory and consumption indicators suggest “prices have a long way to go before supply and demand converge,” Singh wrote in the note.

He pointed out that net Middle Eastern supply losses have narrowed to an estimated 4.7 million barrels a day, down from 12 million to 13 million at the start of the war. But months of disruption have left the market with inadequate buffers to protect against another big supply shock.

Singh forecasts Brent at $95 a barrel in the fourth quarter of 2026, followed by $90, $85, $85 and $80 across the four quarters of 2027. The potential 50% increase represents an upside scenario if disruptions continue.

Separately, UBS analyst Joe Dickinson told clients earlier that “Trump’s approval ratings hit new lows and public Republican dissatisfaction continued to build ahead of the midterm elections. Polymarket is now pricing a 65% probability of a Democratic clean sweep, adding pressure on Trump to deliver tangible progress in negotiations over the conflict in the Middle East.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 09:25

Friends Don’t Let Friends Wear Dow Hats

0
Friends Don’t Let Friends Wear Dow Hats

 Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

At some point, probably sooner than most people think, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is going to hit 100,000. And when it does, you can already picture the scene. It’ll be like every major milestone the Dow has ever hit so far combined.

CNBC will run a countdown. There will be breathless retrospectives about how far the market has come. Somebody will dig up footage from the New York Stock Exchange. And, almost certainly, we will print a stupid hat that says “DOW 100,000”.

Wall Street has been doing this for decades. One of the great traditions of the old NYSE floor was celebrating big round Dow numbers as though humanity had just split the atom for the first time. When the Dow first crossed 10,000 in March 1999, traders cheered, confetti flew and “Dow 10,000” baseball caps were tossed onto the floor.

And back then, maybe the hats actually made sense. The enormous advance in American equities over the preceding generations represented, to a meaningful degree, an extraordinary expansion in American productive capacity, corporate earnings, technological progress and real wealth creation. The country built things, invented things, became more productive and produced companies that generated vastly more earnings than their predecessors. Obviously monetary inflation existed then too, but there was something tangible underneath the milestone worth celebrating.

The hats became part of Wall Street folklore, particularly through Art Cashin, the legendary floor trader who bought his NYSE seat in 1964 and spent six decades becoming one of the most recognizable people on the exchange. When the Dow climbed back above 10,000 in October 2009, the hats came back out and Cashin put his rally cap on again. Shortly thereafter, he was donning a hat again at the 20,000 milestone.

And I’m sure more hats will make their way onto the floor when the Dow hits 100,000, which at this rate feels like it could happen before the turn of the decade. But instead of celebrating, we should remember: this number is nominal. And the further we travel into the modern fiat era, the less impressed I am by nominal milestones.

Creating another semiconductor fabrication process takes years of research. Building a factory takes years. Increasing worker productivity is difficult. Growing corporate earnings requires selling something people actually want at a profit. Creating another trillion dollars of nominal purchasing power requires considerably less effort. Those efforts deserve a hat.

That distinction matters because today we increasingly celebrate the scoreboard without asking how much the measuring stick itself has changed. Nominal numbers are wonderful things to celebrate if you don’t ask too many questions about what the unit you’re measuring them in is worth.

If tomorrow we woke up and every stock doubled in dollar terms while every house, gallon of milk, insurance premium, restaurant bill and salary also doubled, would America suddenly be twice as prosperous? Of course not. But hey….hats.

This is the fundamental problem with treating ever higher nominal stock market levels as some kind of national economic scoreboard. Dow 100,000 will absolutely contain genuine economic progress, including productivity, technological advancement, population growth, corporate earnings growth and successful businesses creating real value. I don’t dispute that for a second.

But unlike building a factory, inventing a new technology or doubling the productive output of a business, increasing the number of dollars in the financial system is not some Herculean accomplishment. And when the supply of money and credit expands dramatically over long periods, some of that expansion inevitably finds its way into the nominal prices of scarce and financial assets. Stocks don’t magically sit outside the monetary system.

Inflation raises nominal prices, and stocks are things with nominal prices. Companies eventually sell their products for more dollars, report revenues and earnings in more dollars and own assets valued in more dollars. Investors, meanwhile, value those businesses in those same dollars. Over sufficiently long periods, therefore, asking whether the Dow will reach some enormous nominal number isn’t particularly interesting. Given enough real economic growth, enough inflation and enough time, increasingly absurd nominal numbers become almost inevitable.

The interesting question is how much real prosperity those 100,000 Dow points represent and what those dollars will actually buy when we get there.

For example, when Wall Street first celebrated Dow 10,000 in 1999, the index really was around 10,000; today it sits above 51,000, a nominal gain of roughly 416%. But consumer prices have risen about 103% over the same period, meaning today’s Dow is only around 25,500 when measured in 1999 purchasing power, a real gain of roughly 155%.

Meanwhile, real GDP has grown about 82% and real median household income only about 19%, while M2 money supply has exploded roughly 424%. To be clear, that doesn’t mean the Dow’s rise is simply the product of money printing, as corporate profits have grown enormously too. It does mean that an increasingly large portion of the spectacular number flashing on the screen reflects the fact that we’re measuring stocks in dollars that buy far less than they did when the original Dow 10,000 hats came out.

Celebrating the nominal number without adjusting for the shrinking measuring stick is increasingly like celebrating that your kid grew from four feet to eight feet after you changed the definition of a foot to 6 inches.

And there’s another uncomfortable part of the celebration. The people receiving most of the benefit from booming financial assets are not distributed remotely evenly across American society.

According to the Federal Reserve’s Distributional Financial Accounts, as of the second quarter of 2026 the wealthiest 10% of American households owned roughly $56.9 trillion of corporate equities and mutual fund shares. The bottom 50% owned about $370 billion. Do the math and the top 10% own roughly 88% of those assets, while the bottom half of the country owns roughly 0.6%.

So when stocks explode higher, who gets rich? Mostly people who were already rich. This isn’t some secret Marxist interpretation of capitalism. It’s literally the Federal Reserve’s own balance sheet data. I’ve written about it often: The Devil Neither Political Party Will Name

That’s fantastic if you own a shitload of corporate equities. It means considerably less if most of your paycheck disappears into rent, groceries, insurance, utilities, transportation and debt payments before you ever get the opportunity to buy them.


🔥 85% OFF FOREVER IF YOU SUBSCRIBE TODAY: I am again offering an 85% discount to anyone that wants to become a Fringe Finance annual subscriber today. It’s a discount you can keep and stays applied for as long as you wish to remain a subscriber: Get 85% off forever


That’s the particularly perverse part of celebrating asset inflation as national prosperity. The people who already own the assets get the protection. The people trying to acquire them get a higher admission price.

That doesn’t mean every stock market gain is caused by inflation. It obviously isn’t. It doesn’t mean monetary policy is solely responsible for wealth inequality, and it doesn’t mean someone becomes poorer every time the Dow rises. The point is simpler: a rising nominal stock index and rising broad based prosperity are two completely different things. Sometimes they coincide. Sometimes a larger portion of the increase is simply the consequence of measuring productive assets in a currency whose supply has grown enormously over time.

The irony is that the monetary and financial architecture that helps produce enormous nominal asset values can create the most spectacular scoreboard precisely for the people who need the scoreboard the least. Asset owners watch their portfolios compound, their homes appreciate, their businesses reprice, their collateral become more valuable and their net worth rise.

Meanwhile, someone without meaningful financial assets can watch the exact same economic process and wonder why a starter home costs a fortune, dinner for two costs $250 and six figures doesn’t feel anything like six figures used to. Both people live in the same economy. Only one of them gets a hat.

So before somebody fires the confetti cannon for Dow 100,000, I’d like to see a few additional statistics displayed next to the giant “100,000” on CNBC. What happened to the purchasing power of the dollar along the way? What happened to median real wages? What happened to housing affordability? How much of the country’s financial wealth is owned by the people wearing the hats, and how much is owned by the people watching them on television?

Because “Dow 100,000” fits beautifully across the front of a baseball cap, but “groceries cost the average lower class family with no financial assets or stock portfolio 2x what they did last year!” doesn’t quite fit as well.

—

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and very often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning, meaning if I’m long I could sell or if I’m short I could cover at any time.

Contributor posts, guest posts and curated posts have been hand selected by me, but have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author or reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

I cannot guarantee the accuracy of any or all facts and figures included in this article though I made an effort to get them right. I have been wrong before and will be wrong again, and encourage you to always double check, do your own research and speak to a licensed financial professional, which I am not.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things I’m bearish on. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions.

Starting in 2026, I have been attempting to no longer actively trade as much as I once did (read my story here). My goal is for my investing/saving to be done by recurring contributions mostly to sector ETFs and a few select equities, trusted third parties who oversee my accounts, and advisors. Such advisors or funds, through individual equities, options, index funds, mutual funds, ETFs, or other securities, may have positions in, exposure to, or holdings of names mentioned herein that I know nothing about. It is possible I could own, have exposure to, or not own anything, at any point. In an attempt to lead a healthier lifestyle, I’ve also excluded myself from fantasy sports, sports betting, online and in-person casinos and prediction markets.

Any of my positions can change immediately as soon as I publish, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier. Hence, why I am a writer.

The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. Many times I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour.

Also, again I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it multiple times because it’s that important you understand.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 08:50

Futures Flat As Oil, Yields Drop Ahead Of Trump UN Address

0
Futures Flat As Oil, Yields Drop Ahead Of Trump UN Address

Futures are flat, having recoverd  a modest drop after the European open, following yesterday’s strong, positive performance despite energy prices and yields being lower for a second consecutive day. As of 8:00am ET, S&P and Nasdaq futures are fractionally in the green after an advance in tech giants and chipmakers drove the index to a one-month high. In premarket trading, semis are down ~60bp after a blistering 5-day run that added 11.2%. Memory names are weaker as Mag7 and Software remain bid. Alibaba ADRs (BABA) gain 3% as the company is rolling out what it calls China’s most powerful AI chip, an accelerator to compete with Nvidia Corp. Brent crude erased gains of as much as 2% to fall toward $98 a barrel. The reversal came after Japan’s Kyodo News Agency reported that Iran has proposed to reopen Hormuz within seven days if the US blockade is lifted. While Iran has since denied this report, a separate report that Saudis may restart the East-West pipeline helped sentiment. Treasury yields turned lower, with the 10-year rate down two basis points to 4.93%. The dollar barely budged while the entire commodity complex is lower, though Base Metals are a bid. These moves likely reflect growing optimism around a diplomatic solution in the Middle East and improved US / China relations, which combined will support AI and lower energy prices, and potentially lower tariff rates. Today’s macro data focus is on ADP’s weekly number, regional Fed activity indicators, and another Fedspeaker. Looking ahead, highlights include UN Meetings: UN General Debate including Trump, Macron, Burnham; Trump-Zelensky meeting; Trump-Burnham meeting; Trump-Gulf Leaders meeting. 

In premarket trading, Mag 7 stocks are mixed: Alphabet +0.5%, Amazon +0.4%, Apple +0.2%, Meta -0.7%, Microsoft +0.8%, Nvidia -0.2%, Tesla +0.7%

  • Alibaba ADRs (BABA) gain 3% as the company is rolling out what it calls China’s most powerful AI chip, an accelerator to compete with Nvidia Corp.
  • GameStop (GME) rises 4% after CEO Ryan Cohen disclosed a $26.4 million stock purchase in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Grab (GRAB) rises 6% after Chief Executive Officer Anthony Ping Yeow Tan disclosed a $29.9 million stock purchase in a filing with the SEC.
  • Quest Diagnostics (DGX) falls 6% after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released new preliminary medicare payment rates for lab services.
  • Vicor (VICR) jumps 9% after the power equipment company raised its third-quarter revenue growth guidance, citing royalties from non-exclusive license to Vertical Power Delivery.
  • Viking Therapeutics (VKTX) soars 32% after announcing positive topline results from a study of dosing regimens for maintaining weight loss.

In other corporate news, Roche’s experimental obesity shot enicepatide reduced body weight by 15.5% in trial, potentially ramping up competition with Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. On Holding plans to increase constant currency sales at a rate in the high teens through 2029 and ratchet up profitability, as the Swiss brand introduces new products for golf and soccer in its effort to take on Adidas and Nike.
Federal prosecutors are investigating whether Binance, the operator of the world’s biggest crypto exchange, violated US sanctions on Iran by not stopping certain trading on its platform. The newly merged Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. will be headquartered in Los Angeles, CEO David Ellison said.

Stocks are set to for a breather after the strongest session since early August. Positive geopolitical developments and a new lease of life for the AI trade made Monday an easy win, but questions remain on both fronts. Crude prices reversed earlier gains after Kyodo reported, citing an Iranian official, that Iran has suggested to the US administration that it will open the Strait of Hormuz within seven days if the US lifts its blockade on Iranian ports and stops military operations related to Hormuz. Alongside the Kyodo report were constructive comments by the IRGC, stating that if Iran’s national interests require negotiations alongside war, then it must negotiate. Elsewhere, Saudi Arabia was testing a restart of its East-West pipeline, according to a person familia with the matter, offering another potential boost to supply. Brent has returned below USD 94/bbl on the above headlines. A constructive risk tone followed, with equity futures and fixed income rising while the USD weakened.

President Donald Trump is set to address the United Nations General Assembly in New York later Tuesday, with traders watching for a possible meeting with his Iranian counterpart that could prove pivotal.

AI-linked stocks were mixed after a positive reception for Meta Platforms Inc.’s new AI agent fueled broad gains in the previous session. Microsoft Corp. rose 0.9% in premarket trading to lead gains among the Magnificent Seven. An exchange-traded fund tracking chipmakers was slightly lower.

Monday’s price action showed that AI FOMO is still a big driving force in the market. One indication appears in call to put skew on a 10% move in SPX over the next month. That skew metric is at its highest since late August, hovering just below its year-to-date high.

The sentiment is across asset classes, with SoftBank said to have drawn more than $20 billion of preliminary demand for its junk bond deal to help fund investments in OpenAI.

The swings in sentiment after Monday’s rally highlighted how confidence in the AI trade remains vulnerable to macroeconomic risks. Bond yields remain near their highest levels in years despite easing this week, as traders continue to price in imminent interest-rate hikes and persistent fiscal shortfalls.

“I don’t see anyone shorting tech and AI before the third-quarter earnings season begins,” said David Kruk, head of trading at La Financiere de l’Echiquier in Paris. “There’s also some hope that Trump will find a way to lower oil prices before the midterms. It makes sense that the market consolidates slightly.”

The strong early uptake of Meta’s Muse AI agent revived hopes of agentic AI coming to the mainstream consumer market, with more insights expected during Zuckerberg’s keynote speech at Meta Connect tomorrow night. Elsewhere in AI, Alibaba rolled out what it called China’s most powerful AI chip, an accelerator to compete with Nvidia and underpin a massive expansion of data center capacity in coming years. Tencent launched its latest image-generation model. Headlines may also come from Amazon Accelerate over the next few days.

Still, angst about the data center buildout continues, with Texas Governor Greg Abbott halting all permits sought by data centers until an audit of risks to the grid is complete. Texas is home of one-fifth of the US’s data center pipeline in terms of IT power capacity, by far the largest of any single state.

Global investors are also gearing up for the summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later this week. Officials from the two sides wrapped up their second day of talks in New York on Monday as they sought to advance negotiations ahead of Xi’s visit to the US. For markets, the big question is what happens when the yearlong trade truce expires in November, noted Jim Reid at Deutsche Bank AG. While the tone between the two sides remains positive, they have yet to reach an agreement.

“Given increasing geopolitical uncertainty worldwide, keeping the world’s two dominant economies on speaking terms has rarely mattered more,” said Roman Ziruk, lead FX strategist at Ebury.

In trade, Vietnamese President To Lam said his nation is “very close” to a deal with the US as he pledged to buy more high-tech goods to narrow the trade gap. Canada’s trade minister said talks with India are “moving along really well” as his country looks for new markets amid a tariff war with the US. Meanwhile, China’s expansion in the rare-earth supply chain could help provide Xi leverage over the US during their talks.

The Stoxx 600 briefly touched a session high too and is up by around 0.2%, rising on Tuesday as oil drops, with tech shares also fueled by optimism around artificial intelligence developments. Retail and consumer shares are the best performers. Energy and insurance fall.
Stoxx 600 gains 0.2% to 643.25 with 200 members down, 390 up and 10 unchanged. Here are some of the biggest movers on Tuesday:

  • Bureau Veritas rises as much as 2.1% after saying it expects double-digit revenue growth over 2027-2028 and aims to deliver €1 billion from AI-driven markets by the end of the decade.
  • Kingfisher shares rise as much as 11% after the B&Q and Screwfix owner posted a first-half earnings beat and lifted its full-year profit guidance beyond analyst expectations.
  • Vusion shares rise as much as 11% after the French maker of electronic labels for retail stores reported first half results that included an almost 50% increase in adjusted Ebitda.
  • Verbund gains as much as 5.1%, while ERG is up as much as 2.9%, after Bank of America upgraded both to neutral from underperform.
  • Smiths Group gains as much as 6.4% with analysts generally positive on the UK manufacturing equipment firm’s performance in 2026, and its outlook for 2027.
  • Buzzi shares fall as much as 5%, to the lowest since January 2025, as UBS downgrades the Italian construction materials firm to sell from neutral, warning that import pressure and CO2 allowance costs could drive sharp earnings downgrades.
  • UBS shares fall as much as 4.1% after CEO Sergio Ermotti says year-on-year transactions in wealth management and banking fee pool are likely down in 3Q.
  • Ericsson slips as much as 4.3% after Morgan Stanley downgrades the Swedish mobile networks and technology group to underweight from equal-weight, saying margins are “inflecting to the downside.”
  • Industrie De Nora tumbles as much as 14% after investor Snam offloaded a chunk of shares at a hefty discount to the last close. The stock has slipped below the offer price.

Asian stocks advanced for a fifth day, as technology sector gained amid optimism over Meta Platform Inc.’s new personal agent. The MSCI Asia Pacific excluding Japan Index jumped as much as 1.5% before paring about half of those gains. Taiwan’s Taiex climbed to a record before erasing most of the advance. Korea’s Kospi closed 0.2% higher, while Japan remained shut for a holiday. In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fluctuated, and is now flat. The yen wiped out its decline, with USDJPY briefly slipping below 157. Tencent shares jumped 5%, as positive feedback on Meta’s new personal agent unleashed investor optimism that the Chinese social media giant may unlock similar AI‑driven optionality through its WeChat ecosystem. Alibaba gained 2% after it rolled out an AI chip and announced plans to expand data center capacity over the coming years. 

In rates, treasuries hold modest gains after erasing losses during European morning following a sharp drop in oil prices. US yields are about 2bp-3bp richer across the curve led by the belly, steepening 5s30s spread by around 1bp. 10-year, near session lows around 4.93%, keeps pace with German counterpart and trails UK by about 1bp. European bond yields shifted direction on the slide for crude, with 10-year yields down by about a basis point in the US, Europe and the US, having been pushing higher through the first portion of the session. 2-year note auction at 1 p.m. has WI yield near 4.75%, about 55bp cheaper than last month’s, which stopped through by 0.4bp; $70 billion 5-year and $44 billion 7-year note auctions follow over next two days. IG dollar issuance slate includes a few offerings so far. Nine were priced Monday totaling around $10 billion, with issuer paying about 3bp in new issue concessions on deals that were 3.4 times covered. US session includes $69 billion 2-year note auction, the first of this week’s three coupon sales, with additional supply pressure possible from Sysco Corp. jumbo multi-currency bond offering. 

In commodities, crude futures fell on signs of diplomatic efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz – driven by a Japanese media report on a possible early reopening of the Strait of Hormuz – and as Saudi Arabia sought to reopen a pipeline Brent is sitting just below $100/bbl while WTI has slipped below $94. Gold fell below $4,300 but recovered some ground, though is still off for the day.

US economic data slate includes ADP weekly employment change (8:15 a.m.), September Philadelphia Fed non-manufacturing activity (8:30 a.m.) and September Richmond Fed manufacturing index (10 a.m.). Fed speaker slate includes New York’s Williams (10:05 a.m.), Vice Chair Jefferson (10:20 a.m.) and Richmond’s Barkin (1 p.m.)

Market Snapshot

Top Overnight News

  • Brent crude dropped below $100 on a Kyodo report that Iran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the US lifted a blockade of its ports. Futures whipsawed. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said it must negotiate if it’s in the national interest to do so. BBG
  • Several Asian refiners have been told informally by Saudi Aramco they will soon be able to pick up oil from the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Loadings from Yanbu have been all-but-halted since the East-West pipeline was closed after being attacked by drones launched from Iraq on Sept. 10. BBG
  • China’s Xi Jinping is expected to press US President Donald Trump to halt Taiwan arms sales under a 1982 joint statement during a visit to Washington this week, which he could do at the US National Archives, sources briefed on the matter said. BBG
  • Alibaba unveiled what it called China’s most powerful AI chip, an accelerator to rival Nvidia and underpin a massive expansion of data center capacity. BBG
  • Saudi Arabia spent months rerouting oil across the desert to circumvent the Strait of Hormuz. Now, with its Red Sea bypass route disrupted by attacks, the world’s oil kingpin is having to return to the waterway it was trying to avoid in the first place. Saudi Aramco, the country’s state-controlled oil giant, is loading more oil onto tankers in the Persian Gulf and then taking its chances sending them through the Strait of Hormuz. WSJ
  • Republican lawmakers are ratcheting up pressure on Donald Trump to ban diesel exports as surging prices squeeze American farmers and truckers just weeks ahead of pivotal midterm elections. FT
  • SoftBank drew more than $20 billion of preliminary demand for what’s shaping up to be one of the biggest junk bond deals ever. BBG
  • Trump’s approval rating fell to 32% – the lowest of his political career – as his fellow Republicans soured on his handling of the cost of living amid the unpopular Iran ‌war. RTRS
  • US office real estate is entering a new phase as billions in maturing debt force owners and investors to confront losses. Office CMBS delinquencies are near a record 12%, with almost $40 billion of debt maturing this year and next already troubled. BBG

Iran War

  • A Senior Iranian Official said that Tehran welcomes the revival of diplomacy if the US takes tangible steps, stating that the Iranian delegation is in the US and has full authority to revive diplomacy in the US, Reuters reported. The official added that details of an agreement to end hostilities with the US can be discussed in New York via mediators. Furthermore, the official said the proposal was delivered to the US via mediators on September 16th while reiterating the Kyodo report that Iran can reopen the Strait within seven days if the US eases military pressure and lifts the blockade.
  • Iran has reportedly suggested to the US administration that it will open the Strait of Hormuz within seven days if the US lifts its blockade on Iranian ports and stop military operations related to Hormuz, Kyodo reported citing an Iranian official. The official added that the proposal called for renewed talks aimed at reaching a permanent end to hostilities between the two countries. Furthermore, the official went on to say that there is a possibility of moving toward an agreement, but the US must demonstrate “seriousness and commitment” if diplomacy is to advance.
  • IRGC said that if Iran’s national interests require negotiations alongside war, then it must negotiate but it will respond to any enemy strike with multiple strikes across different arenas and in various ways, Al Jazeera reported. To add, the IRGC said it will have no contact with the US as a military institution, even if Washington requests it and its assessments indicate the US and Israel are not prepared for a new war, but Iran is ready if they miscalculate.
  • US President Trump said he had meetings regarding Iran and that Iran is not doing well.
  • Iranian Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf said US President Trump cannot impose his power on Iran, adding that Iran will neither shut down nor surrender. Ghalibaf went on to say that missile technology is at a stage where Iran can “target anywhere it decides” and they will never yield in the conflict.
  • Iran’s Judiciary Spokesperson said Iran has full control over the Strait of Hormuz, SNN reported.
  • Iran’s Foreign Ministry said introducing Iran as a cause of fuel price hikes is merely a sign of the US administration’s evasion of responsibility for consequences of military aggression against Iran.
  • G7 issued a statement on the Middle East which noted the situation in Yemen poses an unacceptable threat to the stability and security in the region and to global energy security, while it condemned in the strongest terms the unacceptable continued strikes carried out by the Houthis in Yemen and against Saudi Arabia. It called on the Houthis to immediately cease all military actions, threats and attacks against civilian shipping, as well as called on Iran to end its arming of and support for the Houthis, which it noted violates UN Security Council resolutions. Furthermore, it stated that Iran’s reprehensible actions constitute a dangerous pattern of escalation and risk further exacerbating the conflict.
  • Israeli Defence Minister said they will bomb Iran for the 3rd time if necessary until the regime is overthrown, Al Arabiya reported.
  • French President Macron said he had a constructive discussion with US President Trump on the Red Sea and Ukraine.
  • UK PM Burnham agreed for the UK to provide Saudi Arabia with defensive air-to-air refuelling, with the support to begin in days and last for weeks.
  • EU’s Kallas said the EU naval mission in the Red Sea requires additional naval and air resources, while she added the EU would need more than 10 ships in the Red Sea.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks mostly gained following the advances on Wall Street, where the Nasdaq outperformed and notched a record close as Meta shares surged over 11% on strong adoption of its Muse AI agent and with AMD joining the USD 1tln market cap club, while markets in Japan were closed again for the holidays. ASX 200 traded marginally higher but with gains capped as the strength in tech, consumer discretionary and health care was partly offset by losses in utilities, energy and financials. KOSPI took its cue from the tech and communications outperformance stateside, while South Korea’s Industry Ministry noted that the final announcement on the US investment plan will be made by President Trump, with the funds to be remitted within 45 days if requested by the US. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were positive as tech stocks led the advances in Hong Kong, although some property, energy and biopharmaceutical stocks lagged while participants also continue to await the Trump-Xi summit this week.

Top Asian News

  • RBA Governor Bullock said supply shocks are difficult for monetary policy to deal with and that policy needs to deal with second-round effects on inflation, while she stated that the current decline in house prices is consistent with past episodes and that unemployment at 4.5‑5% is likely to reduce inflation pressure. Furthermore, Bullock said she is not signalling anything on policy, and it is up to the board, as well as noted that inflation risks are materialising from the Middle East and excess demand at home.
  • RBNZ Governor Breman said near-term inflation is expected to be somewhat higher if elevated oil prices persist, while she noted the RBNZ remains focused on the inflation outlook ahead of the October policy decision. Breman also commented that the economic outlook remains subject to significant risks and that current data points to continued economic recovery, though progress remains uneven.
  • Alibaba (9988 HK) unveiled its Zhenwu V900 chip, which it said is the most powerful in China with three times the performance of the predecessor, while the Co. targets 20GW of data centre capacity by 2032 and the Qwen team plans to train a new model at a scale of 5tln-10tln parameters.

European bourses were initially lower this morning, but then flicked into the green after a report in Kyodo suggested that Iran could open the Strait of Hormuz within seven days, citing a source. This helped boost sentiment, with crude benchmarks falling to lows, hence weighing on yields. European sectors hold a positive bias. Retail took the top spot, joined closely by Media and Tech. To the downside resides Insurance and Telecoms. Key European movers include: Kingfisher (+8.2%) , raises its FY26/27 adj. PBT guidance; Smiths Group (+4.5%), FY26 revenue raises Y/Y and raises its dividend above estimates; Evonik (+3.3%), reports that BASF explored a potential deal with the Co. earlier in 2026; Bureau Veritas (+1.0%), raises its 2027-28 total revenue CAGR guidance; Ericsson (-3.5%), downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley.

Top European News

  • German Chancellor Merz’s woes cast doubt over the bloc’s EUR 2tln budget deal, with his authority in Brussels hobbled by his party’s poor results in regional elections, according to FT.
  • UK PM Burnham to call on EU Commission President von der Leyen to allow the UK to partake in the EU’s Made in Europe industrial framework, according to the FT.

FX

  • Snapshot: The FX space has been exceptionally choppy this morning. Initially, G10s were mixed against the USD, but are now mostly lower, as the USD clambered higher as the session progressed. The Kiwi outperforms after hawkish comments from RBNZ Governor Bremen. She noted that near-term inflation is expected to be somewhat higher if elevated oil prices persist.
  • DXY is a touch lower this morning and holds within a 100.30 to 100.66 range. The bias was initially stronger for much of the European morning, before a report in Kyodo, citing an Iranian source, suggested that Iran had told the US admin that it will open the Strait within seven days, if the US lifts its blockade on Iranian ports. This spurred immediate and sustained pressure in the crude complex, weighing on yields and therefore on the USD.
  • Following this action, JPY was the largest beneficiary, flicking from red to green within a few minutes. USD/JPY fell from 157.62 to a session trough of 156.85 within a small timeframe – largely thanks to narrowing yield differentials.
  • Some may view this move as a bit outsized, given that there is currently no progress to peace at this stage. However, it points out that the mood is a bit more constructive heading into the UN General Assembly, where the Iranian President is set to make an appearance. No sideline meetings are currently expected between the US and Iran, however, the US and Gulf leaders will meet. Any positive mood music following that meeting will no doubt put another bout of pressure on the USD.

Fixed Income

  • A bearish start for fixed income, amid initial crude strength and a modest reversal of some of Monday’s action. Gilts underperformed modestly in early-trade, given the unwelcome borrowing data for the UK vs both market and OBR consensus.
  • However, this action, of circa. 30 ticks lower in Bunds, five in USTs and over 40 in Gilts gave way to a geopolitical/energy-induced move higher and into the green. After a Kyodo source outlined that Iran has suggested to the US that it would open Hormuz in one week if the US blockade is lifted, alongside a tone change from the IRGC on negotiating with the US if needed.
  • This lifted USTs to a 106-09+ peak, firmer by just under 10 ticks on the day. Bunds and Gilts followed, to the upside of 23 ticks and just over 30 respectively. However, as the energy move pauses for breath and updates since the two above have, net, been more bullish for crude, this has unwound with fixed income now near-enough unchanged on the day.
  • The day was always headlined by the UN General Assembly, but following the morning reporting, the speeches by US President Trump and Iranian President Pezeshkian tomorrow now draw even greater attention; for any rebuttal of the above, or signs of tangible progress between the sides.
  • That aside, BTPs were disappointed by the 2025 deficit/GDP revision, which remained above the key 3.0% mark that determines the EU’s EDP system. As such, we now look to see if Italian Finance Minister Giorgetti moves forward with using the Escape Clause or not. For reference, the BTP-Bund 10yr spread remained steady at 90bps at the time.
  • Germany sells EUR 3.735bln vs Exp. 5bln 2.90% 2031 Bobl: b/c 1.21x (prev. 1.56x), average yield 3.28% (prev. 3.09%), retention 25.3% (prev. 22.16%).
  • UK sells GBP 4.75bln 4.625% 2032 Gilt: b/c 3.07x (prev. 3.34x), average yield 4.843% (prev. 4.613%), tail 0.4bps (prev. 0.2bps).

Commodities

  • WTI Nov and Brent Dec futures have reversed earlier gains and are now sharply lower following a notable shift in tone from Iran, alongside a report from an Iranian source in Japan’s Kyodo. First, the IRGC said that if Iran’s national interests require negotiations alongside war, then it must negotiate; this contrasts with the usual escalatory tone of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. Shortly after the IRGC headline, and adding to the diplomatic mood, Iran reportedly suggested to the US that it could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days if Washington lifts its blockade on Iranian ports, reiterating Iran’s conditions for Hormuz concessions. The Kyodo report was later corroborated by a Senior Iranian Source who noted that the Iranian delegation is in the US to revive diplomacy with the US. On the supply front, Saudi Arabia has reportedly restarted the East-West oil pipeline to resume crude oil exports from the Yanbu port.
  • Following the above developments, Brent fell from USD 97.70/bbl before the headlines to a USD 93.84/bbl low, while WTI fell from USD 93.14/bbl to a USD 89.40/bbl low. Dutch TTF has followed the broader energy complex lower as the prospect of progress around Hormuz reduces some of the Middle East supply risk premium. The contract has fallen from a EUR 75.22/MWh high to around EUR 72/MWh.
  • Precious metals have trimmed some of their earlier downside as energy prices and global yields fall following the more diplomatic Iranian headlines. Spot gold has recovered from a USD 4,292/oz low to above its 50 DMA (USD 4,316/oz), having earlier reached USD 4,376/oz. Spot silver similarly trades around USD 65.50/oz after falling to a USD 64.57/oz low from a USD 65.81/oz high.
  • Base metals remain firmer, with copper supported by the broader positive global risk tone, while the sharp pullback in energy prices provides some relief to the inflation and growth outlook. COMEX copper trades around USD 6.66/lb, near the upper end of its session range. 3M LME copper trades towards the upper end of a USD 14,703.60-14,790.00/t range.
  • Saudi Arabia restarts the East-West oil pipeline and prepares to resume crude oil exports from Yanbu port later on Tuesday, according to trade sources.
  • Saudi’s Aramco has reportedly told Asian refiners that they will be able to pick up oil from Yanbu soon, Bloomberg reported citing sources.
  • Libya’s NOC said an armed group closed valve 7 on the Sharara crude pipeline to Zawiya port, causing a sharp drop in output at the Sharara oilfield. It was later reported that the Sharara oil field production fell by more than half to about 127k bpd after an armed group shut the pipeline to the Zawiya export terminal.
  • Russia’s oil exports from Black Sea Novorossiysk Port reportedly surged to 650k bpd in September, +50% M/M, sources suggested.
  • Indonesia’s nickel hub will cut output as an El Niño-driven drought reduces production.
  • Russia’s Agriculture Ministry said its grain procurement planned for 2026-27 at 3mln tonnes, IFX reported.

Trade/Tariffs

  • Chinese President Xi’s most urgent goal during the summit with US President Trump is extending the trade truce with the US, but he is also expected to discuss Taiwan, Iran and AI, according to FT.
  • USTR will hold a hearing regarding the Section 301 investigation into Germany’s pharmaceutical policies today.
  • EU Trade Commissioner Sefcovic is to visit China between October 8th-9th for trade talks.
  • Canada’s Trade Minister said the country is making great headway in concluding a free trade agreement with India, while they will continue to have talks with the US.
  • China’s MOFCOM announced the adjustment to the “Catalogue for the Administration of Export of Precursor Chemicals to Specific Countries”, stating that export permits will be required for the US, Mexico and Canada under new rules.
  • China’s MOFCOM said that its Commerce Minister met with the German Auto Industry Association President to discuss bilateral auto cooperation and China-EU trade. MOFCOM said that China is not the root cause of EU trade problems.

Geopolitics

  • Russian Kremlin said they are finding alternative routes for their grain and that Ukraine is the reason for the export issues. Discussions with Turkey around the Black Sea have taken place.
  • Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and US Secretary of State Rubio are set to meet on September 23rd, TASS reported.
  • Russian Defence Ministry said Russian forces struck an oil refinery in Ukraine’s Kremenchuk, TASS reported.
  • Ukraine’s Naftogaz said that the Russian attack caused critical damage, which makes it effectively impossible to restore it.
  • Polish Army said it commenced military aviation operations in Polish airspace following a Russian aerial attack on Ukraine, although it later announced that military aviation operations in Polish airspace concluded and there was no violation of Polish airspace observed.
  • The US will reopen a military base in southern Greenland and establish presence at a second site in eastern Greenland, according to sources.

Event Calendar

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

Markets have put in a strong performance over the last 24 hours, with Brent crude oil (-3.40%) briefly falling beneath $100/bbl again as hopes grew for a diplomatic solution in the Middle East. Brent is a little above $101/bbl this morning but net net the week has started more optimistically. This has been highlighted by the record high for the Nasdaq (+2.26%), Bitcoin moving back above $85,000 for the first time since January, whilst the 10yr bund yield (-6.3bps) had its biggest daily decline since May. And despite September’s reputation as one of the worst of the year for markets, the latest moves actually leave the S&P 500 (+1.49%) back in positive territory for the month and within half a percent of its all-time high.  

Although oil is back up a little overnight, Brent fell back beneath $100/bbl yesterday for the first time in nine trading sessions before closing at $100.34/bbl. In part, that followed more positive headlines over the weekend, including comments from President Trump to Fox News that he would be open to meeting Iran’s President at the UN this week. So that raised hopes about some kind of deal between the two sides, and it helped drive a big reduction in energy prices across the board. In fact, European natural gas futures (-7.88%) saw their biggest daily decline since July, which was a huge positive impulse to risk appetite given Europe’s dependence on imported energy. Even though there are hopes of diplomatic progress, the rise back in oil overnight seems to be in part due to Bessent suggesting that all Iranian airlines will be shut down from tomorrow with anyone providing fuel, landing services etc., shut out of the dollar system.  

For now the momentum is on the more positive side though and with inflation fears subsiding again, that meant investors dialled back the likelihood of rapid rate hikes, even if plenty are still priced in for the month ahead. For instance, markets are still fully pricing in another ECB hike by year-end, but the probability of a second hike this year fell from 52% on Friday to 40% by the close. The read across from the energy pullback to Fed repricing wasn’t as clear, with 33bps of Fed hikes still priced by year end. That came amid some hawkish-leaning commentary from regional Fed presidents, with Goolsbee suggesting there was some “traditional demand overheating” around the AI investment boom, while Musalem said that the current fed funds rate of 3.75% to 4% is “on the accommodative side”.    

Notwithstanding the hawkish Fedspeak, lower energy prices proved to be a huge tailwind for sovereign bonds, particularly in Europe. So yields came down across the continent, with those on 10yr bunds (-6.3bps), OATs (-9.3bps) and BTPs (-9.6bps) all seeing sharp declines. In fact, in all three cases that was their biggest decline since May. In the US, the declines weren’t quite as big, with the 10yr Treasury yield down -4.5bps to 4.95% while the 2yr yield actually inched up +0.3bps to 4.75%. That brought the Treasury 2s10s slope to its flattest since February 2025, just before Trump’s tariff escalation raised questions about the sustainability of US exorbitant privilege.  
For equities, it was also a very strong session, as fresh optimism on the outlook led to big gains across the major indices. In the US, the S&P 500 (+1.43%) rose for a third consecutive session and had its best day in seven weeks, leaving the index just -0.44% beneath its record high from last month. Tech stocks led the rally, with the Nasdaq (+2.26%) and the Magnificent 7 (+3.44%) rising to new record highs of the own. Top performers included Meta (+11.43%), amid optimism over its Muse AI agent, and chipmaker AMD (+9.95%), which became the latest company to reach a $1trn valuation. Meanwhile, there were broad gains in Europe, where the STOXX 600 (+1.02%), the DAX (+1.07%) and the CAC 40 (+0.92%) all climbed.  

Speaking of geopolitical developments, there were plenty of headlines on the US-China trade talks yesterday, ahead of the meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi later this week. For markets, the big question is what’s going to happen when the current one-year trade truce expires in November, and whilst the general tone remains positive, there still isn’t an agreement yet. For instance, the New York Times reported yesterday that the US had proposed a 6-month extension, whilst China had pushed for a longer one. So that fitted with comments from US Trade Representative Greer on Bloomberg, who was asked if it would be a 3-6 month extension, and he said “that’s probably the right kind of range”. Otherwise he sounded positive though, saying that “we’ll continue talking and I think both sides want it”.

Ahead of the Trump-Xi meeting, our geopolitical analysts, economists and strategists are hosting a China macro webinar at 9am LDN today. You can register  here.

Otherwise, the big political news came from Germany yesterday, where there was plenty of reaction after Sunday’s state election results. As a reminder, that vote saw Chancellor Merz’s CDU party fail to meet the 5% threshold in the state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, meaning they’re not in the regional parliament for the first time in Germany’s post-war history. Yet despite the speculation over Merz’s position, he said that he had the backing of CDU party leaders, and that both the CDU and SPD wanted the governing coalition to continue. 

Asian equity markets are broadly higher this morning, led by technology stocks as an overnight rally on Wall Street reignited investor appetite for AI-related stocks. Across the region, the KOSPI (+0.69%) is leading gains, while Japanese markets remain closed through Wednesday. Elsewhere, China’s CSI 300 (+0.51%) is trading moderately higher, with the Shanghai Composite (+0.23%) and Hang Seng (+0.33%) posting modest advances. Meanwhile, Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (+0.29%) is also edging higher. US equity futures are fairly flat.  

Looking at the day ahead now, data releases include the UK public finances for August, the European Commission’s preliminary consumer confidence reading for the Euro Area in September, and the US Richmond Fed’s manufacturing index for September.  Otherwise from central banks, we’ll hear from Fed’s Vice Chair Jefferson, the Fed’s Williams and Barkin, ECB President Lagarde, and the ECB’s Kaasik, Nagel, Kocher, Seijpen and Simkus.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 08:39

UK’s Burnham Approves Military Support To Saudis, Limited To Aerial Refueling 

0
UK’s Burnham Approves Military Support To Saudis, Limited To Aerial Refueling 

The UK has finally made a formal decision on the intense political and foreign policy question it has faced for the couple weeks since the Houthis started making rapid gains against the Saudi-backed coalition in Yemen.

London has announced it will increase its military support to Saudi Arabia, albeit it has become clear that this will still be very limited. “We’re doing it for national security reasons in support of our own national security,” Defense Minister Luke Pollard told Sky News of “defensive” air-to-air refuelling for Saudi warplanes engaged in air raids over Yemen. Needless to say Riyadh was hoping for much more.

RAF Voyager, via UK Defence Ministry

“In dangerous times, good friends stand together,” he added, defending the support as consistent with international law.

Confirming the action Monday, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he was “acting to secure the interests of Britain and the wider region, because of course Saudi Arabia has been experiencing attack, is looking at potential further disruption, and we need to keep those pathways (for oil) open.”

The appeals from Riyadh only intensified after the kingdom’s East-West pipeline was taken offline by a devastating drone attack. Blame immediately fell on the Houthis, which have been mounting cross-border missile and drone strikes; however, a US official also pointed to Shia paramilitaries out of Iraq as a likely culprit.

The UK has further said it will “work with partners to support regional stability, protect civilians and support humanitarian access.”

Certainly this Burnham government move is largely political and symbolic – a way to tall the Saudis and the world that ‘we are doing something’ but without actually doing much of deep substance. After all, this is all that’s apparently been offered so far:

U.K. officials say the agreement will start in the coming days, and involve one RAF Voyager refueling Saudi planes on “defensive” missions.

Certainly the Saudis were hoping for much, much more – possibly even ground troops, or at the very least jets actively involved in combat as part of the coalition. The Associated Press suggests that eventually the Saudis will be supported with refueling planes (plural).

While Britain has long had a close defense partnership with the kingdom, it hasn’t shown an interest in getting bogged down in Yemen operations, also at a moment the Iran conflict remains unpredictable

But if the Houthi attack on Aramco sites intensify, the UK could get more deeply involved in the conflict given that Burnham said keeping the pathways for oil “open” remains a high priority. 

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has also of late been pressing Egypt, France, Turkey, and Pakistan to step up. The Saudis recently signed the Mecca Defense Pact with Pakistan and Egypt.

All involved on the Saudi side probably fear getting sucked into a quagmire, but also have clear interests in seeing Red Sea shipping stay open and free.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 08:35

Iran’s Fars Calls Reuters’ Hormuz Reopening Story “Invalid” Ahead Of Trump’s UN Address

0
Iran’s Fars Calls Reuters’ Hormuz Reopening Story “Invalid” Ahead Of Trump’s UN Address

Update:

  • Iran’s Fars Rejects Hormuz Reopening Reports As Brent Slides
  • Brent Tumbles On US Media & Aligned Outlets Pushing Rumored Diplomatic Efforts 

Iran’s Fars Rejects Reporting 

Kyodo and Reuters published positive diplomatic headlines early Tuesday morning that sent Brent crude futures tumbling below $100 a barrel, but Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency denied them.

Kyodo and Reuters, citing Iranian sources, reported that Tehran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days if Washington eased US naval pressure on the Hormuz chokepoint and lifted its blockade of Iranian ports.

Fars called those two reports “invalid and incorrect.”

Despite Fars’ rejection of the reporting, US media and aligned outlets focused this morning on rumored diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict ahead of President Trump’s United Nations General Assembly address later today.

Brent crude remains below $100.

Brent Tumbles Below $100 After Report Says Iran Offers To Reopen Hormuz Chokepoint

Brent crude futures tumbled early Tuesday, as much as 3%, and slid below the $ 100-a-barrel level to the low $98 range after reports that Iran offered to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within one week if the Trump administration begins easing naval pressure in the critical waterway and ends its blockade of Iranian ports. 

Tehran conveyed the proposal through intermediaries as part of efforts to revive negotiations and end the conflict, Kyodo News reported, citing a senior Iranian government official. 

The offer calls for the US naval blockade of the critical waterway and Iranian ports to end in exchange for reopening the strait. This comes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s economic war against Tehran has ramped up (read latest). 

Here’s more from the Japanese outlet:

The proposal, which has already been conveyed to Washington through mediators, calls for renewed talks aimed at reaching a permanent end to hostilities between the two countries, the official said.

Tehran plans to use the U.N. General Assembly gathering this week in New York to consult with countries acting as intermediaries.

The official ruled out a meeting between Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and U.S. President Donald Trump on the fringes of the gathering, but said progress toward an agreement remains possible.

“There is a possibility of moving toward an agreement,” the official said, while adding that Washington must demonstrate “seriousness and commitment” if diplomacy is to advance.

Iran is seeking signs from Washington that it is prepared to return to negotiations and take steps toward an end to the U.S. military blockade of Iranian ports and a halt to military operations related to the Strait of Hormuz, the official said.

If such steps are taken, Iran is prepared to reopen the strategic waterway within seven days and return to the negotiating table, according to the official.

Hamad Hussain, senior climate and commodities economist at Capital Economics, was quoted by Reuters as saying this overnight development is a positive sign that diplomatic efforts may be working.

“There may also be other obstacles, such as the issue of tolls and fees, to overcome before a lasting solution can be achieved,” Hussain added.

Later this morning, President Trump will address the United Nations General Assembly and meet with world leaders, likely discussing the Gulf conflict and Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Despite another exchange of threats between Washington and Tehran on Sunday, Trump said he was open to meeting Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian this week at UNGA. An Iranian official subsequently told Reuters that no direct meeting would take place. 

Diplomatic movement appears to be happening under the surface to resolve the US-Iran conflict and the global diesel crisis. However, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, does not expect much downside in Brent prices until transits through the maritime chokepoint increase, particularly shipments of refined products, where the real energy crisis lurks ahead of the Northern Hemisphere winter.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 07:47

‘Survival Mode’ – Farmers Crushed As Trump’s War On Iran Sends Diesel Cost Soaring

0
‘Survival Mode’ – Farmers Crushed As Trump’s War On Iran Sends Diesel Cost Soaring

As Donald Trump’s war on Iran nears the seven-month mark, the economic damage is reverberating all over the world, and all across the United States. Among the Americans who are feeling the most pain from a war their federal legislators never declared are the nation’s farmers, who are growing increasingly desperate under the weight of rising costs for diesel, fertilizer and equipment.

It’s a demographic that leans hard to the right, but now feels let down by Trump and others in Washington. “It’s his war that caused this, this war in Iran. We’re not winning that war. And many farmers feel like we shouldn’t be there,” farmer John Boyd, Jr told CNN. Trump says the war in Iran is necessary to prevent the country from building a nuclear weapon. However, going back to 2007 and up to the eve of the war, the US intelligence committee has repeatedly assessed that Iran was not building one. 

“I’ve done this 34 years. I have never worried and stressed like I have the last year,” North Carolina farmer Matt Bell told CBS News. “We’ve cut everything we can cut.” Trying every option he can think of to improve his cash flow, Bell has put off replacing equipment, produced some of his own fertilizer, and opened a pumpkin patch and hayride business for the fall. The rising costs come after a difficult period had already weakened his operation’s financial security. 

“We’re just getting to the point now there’s nothing left to cut,” farmer Matt Bell told CBS News

“The last several years in agriculture have been terrible, and we have just cut the fat anywhere we could. But we’re just getting to the point now there’s nothing left to cut. You cannot run without fuel. You cannot run without fertilizer. You have to have that,” Bell said. 

As a result of a major reduction in oil exports from the Persian Gulf, the nationwide average cost for a gallon of diesel hit $6.49 this week, up 75% from a year ago, according to the AAA. Lately, the price volatility has led Bell’s diesel distributors to offer price quotations that are only good for a matter of hours. He’d budgeted $35,000 for fuel in 2026, but blew past that number in August. “Every piece of equipment on this farm runs on diesel,” he emphasized. 

In an interview with Sky News, Texas cattle rancher Lynn Fleming said her August outlay for few was almost double what she’d paid in recent years. “Obviously the main [factor] is what we’re facing everyday with the Iranian situation,” Fleming said. Her husband, Robert, said he felt blindsided by the war. “We had no idea that he was going to pull the prank with the Strait of Hormuz. He didn’t tell us … he was going to go do the military maneuvers and try to control the oil supply over there. We had no warning of what was going to happen.” A major cornerstone of Trump’s 2024 campaign was his pledge to be a “peace president” who would refrain from starting any new wars.    

In addition to the war, Bell blames Trump’s tariff policies for boosting the prices of many of a farmer’s essentials. “Everything we’re touching, the fertilizer, fuel, chemicals, seed, parts — you know, the whole nine yards, everything that we touch has gone up,” he said.  

Cattle ranchers say they felt undercut by Trump’s decision to combat rising food prices by eliminating tariffs on imported beef — at a time when US ranchers were already under financial duress. “I’m already absorbing your high fuel prices that came out of nowhere,” South Texas rancher Josh Eilers told Sky. “It’s like, c’mon guys, just help me out a little bit. I just can’t keep absorbing more and more and more, or I simply won’t be able to afford to do this anymore.” 

“I do not want any American to feel sorry for the American farmer,” said Bell. “I want the Americans to be mad that we have been put in this situation. We’re fighting for survival and we’re running out of options… I am very mad. I think there’s been some very bad policy that’s been made that has led things to get to where we are.” 

Most of the farmers and ranchers quoted in this article say they voted for Trump. Their ire over the state of affairs is surely contributing to a major nationwide dip in Republican enthusiasm going into the midterms. Robert Fleming had this to say: “I’m afraid there’s going to be some changes made [in] voting. Maybe people not even voting, who knows, because a lot of the people feel like we the people are not being heard.” 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 07:45

NY Lawmaker Launches $30 Million Effort To Coordinate Democrat Control Of AI

0
NY Lawmaker Launches $30 Million Effort To Coordinate Democrat Control Of AI

New York Assemblymember Alex Bores is launching a $30 million effort to unite Democrats behind a common artificial intelligence regulatory agenda ahead of the 2028 elections, taking the issue that defined his unsuccessful congressional campaign to a national stage.

New York State Assembly member Alex Bores

His congressional run was bankrolled by Anthropic’s political money, a PAC funded with $20 million from the company and $401,250 from its employees, and his new group has not said who is funding it.

The organization, “Who Decides,” is launching Tuesday with Bores and his former chief of staff, Anna Myers, leading an effort to “build the winning Democratic answer to AI.” Its objective is to turn concerns about the technology into a shared platform for Democratic candidates, from presidential contenders to candidates further down the ballot.

“Who Decides’ goal is that by 2028, Democratic candidates from the top of the ticket on down run with a common AI safety agenda,” the group’s launch announcement states. “That means addressing the harms people already see and the broader danger that increasingly powerful and out-of-control systems could destabilize our economy, our democracy, and our safety.”

The group plans to concentrate on 11 states it identifies as important to the 2028 presidential primary and general election: South Carolina, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan, Virginia, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Its plans include quarterly state and national polling, national conferences and partnerships with local organizations, Politico reports.

Those partnerships would bring together labor unions, parents, educators, civil-rights organizations, faith groups and other constituencies. The organization says it will work with those groups to develop AI policy positions and put them before candidates through questionnaires, forums, endorsements and briefings.

“We don’t let five people write the laws for hundreds of millions of Americans,” Bores says in the announcement, referring to the concentration of decision-making among AI executives. “There is no reason to let them write the rules for AI.”

An Organizing Push Ahead Of 2028

The launch follows a series of warnings from within the AI industry and competing political responses over how aggressively Washington should intervene. Former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon warned last week that increasingly powerful AI could threaten humanity. Leaders at Anthropic and OpenAI subsequently called for slowing development so safety measures could keep pace.

Former President Barack Obama has urged Democrats to make AI a central political issue, with plans addressing both safety and the technology’s economic consequences. His comments included a call for the party’s 2028 presidential candidates to focus on the issue.

The launch comes days after AI techbros agreed that a ‘pause’ in development was needed along with new oversight (something Beijing won’t agree to). In a Saturday essay which set off the calls to slow down, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposes governance that lives largely inside the industry: third-party evaluators embedded in the labs on terms the labs set, with the right to publish their findings; coordination among frontier companies on safety standards, enabled by a narrow antitrust waiver from Washington; and, only later, agreements with foreign governments. He calls federal regulation of every frontier lab the most effective approach but argues that passing laws takes time. Who Decides starts from the premise that “a few executives inside a handful of companies are making all the decisions,” and it refuses their money. The two efforts want many of the same rules, including published safety plans, incident reporting and independent testing of frontier models, and disagree about who should write them and how soon. The industry’s safety wing has already bet on Bores once: Public First Action, a PAC funded by a $20 million Anthropic donation, spent $450,000 supporting him in the primary.

President Trump pushed in the opposite direction Monday, rejecting calls for additional restrictions and arguing that existing government powers were sufficient. He also warned that slowing American development could benefit China.

Incest Is Best?

Bores’ new group grew out of a campaign funded by Amodei’s network – which runs through Effective altruism. The same network produced METR, the evaluator Amodei’s essay names as his preferred watchdog – which itself was bankrolled largely by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz. Its most famous adherent, Sam Bankman-Fried, is in prison for fraud, and his $500 million stake in Anthropic, bought in 2022 with FTX customer funds, was liquidated in the exchange’s bankruptcy. Anthropic grew up inside that world: Moskovitz and Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn funded its early rounds; Dario Amodei was an early signer of the movement’s giving pledge; his sister and co-founder Daniela is married to Holden Karnofsky, the Open Philanthropy co-founder who joined Anthropic last year; and the trust with power over the company’s board includes the CEO of the Centre for Effective Altruism.

Bores’ new group grew out of a campaign funded by Amodei’s network – which runs through effective altruism, a left-wing ‘movement’ that began with global poverty and animal welfare, preaches earning as much as possible in order to give it away, and over the past decade made preventing an AI catastrophe its central cause, bankrolled largely by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz. The same network produced METR, the evaluator Amodei’s essay names as his preferred watchdog. The movement’s most famous adherent, Sam Bankman-Fried, is in prison for fraud, and his $500 million stake in Anthropic, bought in 2022 with what prosecutors said were FTX customer funds, was liquidated in the exchange’s bankruptcy. Anthropic grew up inside that world: Moskovitz and Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn funded its early rounds; Dario Amodei was an early signer of the movement’s giving pledge; his sister and co-founder Daniela is married to Holden Karnofsky, the Open Philanthropy co-founder who joined Anthropic last year; and the trust with power over the company’s board includes the CEO of the Centre for Effective Altruism.

The same network reached Bores. Anthropic’s $20 million gift to Public First Action, which backed him, sits alongside $401,250 that Anthropic employees gave to campaigns supporting him. Who Decides’ pledge bans frontier-lab executives and corporate money – but doesn’t bar the philanthropies that fund the AI-safety field. The group won’t say who supplied the $10 million it has reportedly raised. The movement has tried electoral politics before: in 2022, Bankman-Fried’s super PAC spent more than $10 million on Carrick Flynn’s House primary in Oregon (which Flynn lost). 

Who Decides, meanwhile, is calling for an AI agenda that a future Democratic president could act on during the first 100 days in office.

From A Congressional Defeat To A National Campaign

Bores made AI regulation a central issue in his congressional primary campaign after helping pass New York’s RAISE Act. The legislation requires major frontier AI developers to publish safety plans and report critical safety incidents. Although he lost the primary, Bores and Myers describe the campaign as the foundation for their new organization.

“The lesson Bores and Myers took from those fights was that confronting the AI industry is fertile political ground and that public demand for answers on AI policy exists but remains scattered,” the announcement states.

The organization says it will reject “corporate money or contributions from senior executives at frontier AI companies.” Its website directs prospective donors to a Givebutter fundraising page.

The $30 million figure refers to the overall effort, rather than an established amount already raised. A New York Times report summarized by Techmeme says the nonprofit has raised $10 million and plans to seek another $20 million in 2027.

For Bores and Myers, the stated task is to turn separate concerns about AI into a coordinated political program.

“What’s missing is a coalition capable of turning that energy into a governing consensus before the technology, the economic dislocation, and the partisan battle lines harden,” the launch announcement says.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 09/22/2026 – 06:55