Russian authorities seized the remaining businesses and assets of Swiss food giant Nestle and three French groups, the latest move against Western firms in response to sanctions against Moscow. 

A decree signed by President Vladimir Putin issued late Thursday transferred the Russian operations of Nestle, French retailer Auchan and the former Leroy Merlin DIY chain, now known as Lemana Pro, to a company called LEV Management. The decree also covers the Russian subsidiaries of French logistics group FM Logistic, France24 reported.

Investigative outlet Novaya Gazeta Europe reported that LEV Management was created only at the end of 2025, and is headed by a Russian interior ministry general. It had no known business activity.

Most Western companies quickly sold their Russian operations and holdings after the Ukraine invasion, or at least isolated them, as sanctions have made trading in most goods difficult.

Russia has since made it difficult for firms to leave, requiring presidential authorization for deals, or seizing the assets outright.

In a short statement, Nestle said it was “committed to taking all necessary steps to protect its rights and ensure continuity of business operations in the interests of all stakeholders, particularly its employees“.

“The company is assessing the situation and its options,” it added, without providing details of its residual Russian operations.

Jean-Philippe Bertschy of the Swiss investment bank Vontobel said he expected the financial impact to Nestle would be small “given Russia’s limited contribution to group sales”.

He said Russia now accounted for just over one percent of the group’s sales, down from around two percent before the Ukraine war.

It has suspended “the vast majority of sales, non-essential imports, advertising and capital investment”, he said, while continuing to supply essential food items.

Auchan and Leroy Merlin are both controlled by France’s Mulliez family, and each has around a dozen outlets in Russia. 

The latest seizure echoes Moscow’s 2023 takeover of Danone’s Russian business, which was later sold to a nephew of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov.  

Via Remix News,

Foreign-born suspects account for nearly three-quarters of sexual-crime arrests in Basque Country, official figures show

Official statistics released by the Basque regional police, the Ertzaintza, indicate that people born outside Spain made up 58.7 percent of all arrests in the first half of 2026 even though they represent 10.2 percent of the population.

The disparity is sharper in several high-profile offense categories.

Of the 107 people detained for crimes against sexual freedom, 79 were born abroad, making up 74 percent of arrests in this category, according to data obtained by The Objective.

Foreign-born suspects also accounted for 73.3 percent of homicide arrests and 61.3 percent of those for causing injury.

The highest shares appeared in other offences: 94.7 percent of drunk-driving arrests (36 of 38), 79.6 percent of theft arrests (222 of 279), and 77.6 percent of robberies involving violence or intimidation (253 of 326).

The figures come from data the Basque Department of Security, which began publishing this data systematically at the end of 2025. Until then, the Ertzaintza routinely omitted the birthplace of detainees.

Security councillor Bingen Zupiria of the PNV said the change followed “tremendous pressure” from the Popular Party (PP) and Vox in the Basque parliament. Police unions supported the move as a contribution to “crime prevention.”

After that pressure, Zupiria stated, the department was forced to “change its criteria.” Arrests are now broken down first by continent and then by region, including North Africa, the rest of Africa, Latin America, or Europe.

The publication of these breakdowns ended a long-standing practice of withholding origin information that the Basque government said had created more confusion than clarity. Citizens, officials argued, have a right to see the actual composition of recorded crime.

Within the foreign-born group, those originating from North Africa are notable for their high offense rates.

They form roughly 1.8 percent of the Basque population yet accounted for 37 percent of homicide arrests, 24 percent of sexual-assault arrests, 64 percent of theft arrests, 48 percent of robberies with force, and 66 percent of violent robberies in the first six months of the year.

Suspects from the rest of Africa and from Latin America also appear over-represented in several categories of crimes against persons and property.

Overall arrests have been rising. The Ertzaintza recorded 6,903 in 2021 and 9,222 in 2025. The first half of 2026 already produced 5,050. If the pace continues, the year would end with a record of about 10,100.

Only the Basque and Catalan regional forces currently publish the origin of suspects to the general public. However, an internal document obtained earlier this year showed that, across Spain as a whole, foreigners accounted for 51 percent of daily arrests (527 of 1,033). The share was higher in Madrid (64 percent), Catalonia (71.8 percent) and Murcia (60 percent), close to the Basque figure of 59 percent.

Other research has shown that foreigners commit 500 percent more rapes than Spaniards and 400 percent more murders.

Prison data from the Basque Department of Justice for August 2026 shows 722 of the 1,967 inmates (36.7 percent) were foreign-born.

Among those under 25, the proportion rose to 65.9 percent, or two out of three.

Read more here…

Authored by James Gorrie via The Epoch Times,

When President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping meet at the White House on Sept. 24, the public agenda will be much larger than artificial intelligence (AI). Trade, semiconductors, rare earths, Taiwan, and other disputes will all be on the table.

But AI is different.

Trade agreements can be renegotiated. Tariffs can be raised or lowered. Semiconductor restrictions can be changed.

AI is becoming a general-purpose technology that can transform military power, manufacturing, cyberwarfare, scientific research, and the global economy simultaneously.

That makes the Trump-Xi meeting, in a very important sense, an AI summit.

China Is Much Closer Than Many Americans Think

The old assumptions about China’s subordinate position in AI were simple: America had the technology, and China was trying to catch up.

That assumption is dangerously outdated.

Stanford’s 2026 AI Index found that U.S. and Chinese frontier AI models have traded the lead several times since early 2025. By March 2026, the leading U.S. model held only a 2.7 percent advantage over the leading Chinese model on the benchmark measured by Stanford.

The United States still has major advantages. It produces more top-tier models, attracts vastly more private AI investment, and remains strong in advanced chips, computing infrastructure, and leading AI companies. U.S. private AI investment reached $285.9 billion in 2025, compared to $12.4 billion in China.

But China has other advantages. It leads the world in AI publications, citations, patent output, and industrial robot installations.

That last advantage is particularly important. China installed roughly 295,000 industrial robots in 2024, accounting for 54 percent of worldwide installations. The significance is not simply that China has more robots, but that it has enormous manufacturing capacity to deploy AI-powered machines.

That’s a critical factor that can’t be overstated. AI becomes much more powerful when it is connected to factories, warehouses, vehicles, supply chains, and physical machines.

China is already building that connection.

The Robotics Advantage Is Becoming an AI Advantage

The next phase of AI may not be dominated by chatbots, but rather by machines that can see, reason, move, and act.

China has built the world’s largest industrial-robot deployment base and is rapidly expanding into humanoid robotics.

Chinese companies are also pushing open AI models that can be adapted and deployed cheaply. A 2026 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission analysis found that Chinese laboratories have increasingly embraced open-source models and that Alibaba’s Qwen ecosystem had more than 100,000 derivatives on Hugging Face.

This creates a powerful and escalating feedback loop. More AI creates better robots; more robots generate more real-world data; more data improves AI; better AI makes robots more capable; and more capable robots create more demand for AI.

That is where China’s unrivaled manufacturing scale becomes a strategic advantage.

What Does Xi Want?

Xi has little reason to accept an agreement that simply slows China’s technological development.

Beijing has repeatedly described AI as a strategic technology and has pursued greater technological self-reliance in response to American export controls.

China is also promoting its own model of global AI governance through Beijing’s Global AI Governance Initiative. It calls for international cooperation on AI governance, safety standards, and technological development.

The fly in that ointment is that cooperation does not necessarily mean restraint.

China’s current approach is closer to regulating the risks of AI while continuing to develop it aggressively. Reuters recently reported that Beijing is working on mandatory AI safety standards while simultaneously pushing rapid AI deployment and maintaining human oversight of advanced systems.

Xi Has Several Possible Objectives

China’s top leader could seek greater access to advanced computing and semiconductor technology, seek limits on American restrictions against Chinese AI companies, and push for international rules that recognize China’s role in setting AI standards.

He could seek agreement on specific dangers, such as AI-enabled cyberattacks, without accepting restrictions on China’s broader AI development. The United States has already proposed discussions with China about monitoring AI-directed cyberattacks and other risks.

What Does Trump Want?

The U.S. president’s position presents a thorny contradiction.

He has emphasized the need for the United States to remain ahead of China in AI while resisting proposals that would significantly slow American development.

He’s not alone in thinking that. House Speaker Mike Johnson similarly argued this week that an AI moratorium could surrender America’s competitive advantage to China.

At the same time, Washington has obvious reasons to prevent AI from becoming an uncontrolled strategic weapon. Advanced AI could assist cyberattacks, accelerate biological research, automate influence operations, and potentially enable autonomous military systems.

The U.S. and Chinese officials have already begun discussing some of these risks, creating a potential basis for a bargain.

Trump could potentially offer China something Beijing wants – reduced technology restrictions, greater access to certain chips, reduced tariffs, investment opportunities, or other economic concessions – in exchange for verifiable limits on specific dangerous AI applications.

But there is an enormous problem.

Why Would China Or the US Slow Down?

China has spent years trying to eliminate its dependence on American technology.

It would have little strategic incentive to surrender an advantage it believes could determine economic and military power for decades.

That makes a broad promise to “slow AI” difficult to trust.

Beijing could agree to safety standards, reporting requirements, or restrictions on particular applications while continuing to invest heavily in models, robotics, chips, and industrial deployment.

That’s a predictable consequence of competing national interests. The United States would likely engage in the same practice. Thus, neither Washington nor Beijing wants to be the country that slows down while the other continues.

That is the central dilemma of AI.

The Real Issue Is Not Who Wins-Or Is It?

The most important question may, therefore, not be whether America or China wins the AI race.

It is a question of whether either country can establish meaningful limits before increasingly autonomous systems become too difficult for governments – or their creators – to control.

That concern is no longer confined to science fiction.

AI researchers and technology executives are openly debating whether increasingly capable systems could eventually operate beyond effective human supervision. China is discussing the same loss-of-control problem, although its preferred solution is to rely on technical standards and state supervision rather than to slow development.

That’s why everything else at the Trump-Xi summit may ultimately look smaller.

Yes, Taiwan matters; but so do trade, semiconductors, oil, and rare-earth elements.

But AI is becoming the technology underneath all of them. Whoever develops the most capable AI could gain advantages in every one of those areas.

In the AI race, that means winner-takes-all.

On the other hand, if AI becomes capable of independently designing better AI, controlling machines and making decisions at speeds humans cannot match, the question will change again.

It will no longer be simply which country controls AI, but rather whether humans still control the technology they created.

That’s the issue Trump and Xi cannot afford to treat as just another item on the summit agenda.

Officials in Hennepin County, Minnesota, shut down a $2 million relief fund for businesses claiming to be affected by federal immigration enforcement after officials discovered widespread fraud among applicants, forcing them to end the program. The county board created the fund to help businesses “harmed” by Operation Metro Surge, the federal immigration enforcement operation that began in December 2025. Federal agents shot and killed two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, in Minneapolis in January, turning it into one of the most scrutinized immigration enforcement actions in the country.

Of about 300 applications submitted, only 82 were deemed legitimate. Officials distributed only $500,000 before shutting the program down.

County officials found the problem ran deeper than a few opportunists padding their paperwork. Site visits revealed businesses listed on applications that did not exist. Investigators found the same AI-generated language pasted into dozens of unrelated applications with little variation.

Hennepin County Commissioner Jeff Lunde said the fraud reflected a broader breakdown. “The fact that people, after all this fraud, felt that they could apply and get away with it, I think it’s a problem because clearly there’s no fear out there,” Lunde said. “Until we get it where people fear things, then they’re gonna keep doing it.”

Lunde described watching the numbers deteriorate in real time. “Then at a certain point we’re like, ‘OK, we’re getting declining results on that.’ And so we said it’s time to stop the program. So we just stopped processing at that point,” he said. He described the bulk of the applications as fraudulent outright, a flood of fabricated claims rather than a handful of bad actors slipping through the cracks.

Neither Hennepin County nor Walz’s office responded to Fox News’ requests for comment.

Independent journalist Nick Shirley kicked off Minnesota’s fraud reckoning with a viral December video accusing several Somali-run daycare centers of billing the state for children who were never there, a claim he put at more than $110 million in fraudulent billing. The FBI previously dismantled a $250 million fraud scheme involving the nonprofit Feeding Our Future, which falsely claimed to have served millions of meals to children during the pandemic.

President Trump has spent much of the past year aiming his rhetoric about Minnesota’s fraud problem at the state’s Somali population, pointing to a string of prosecutions involving nonexistent or dormant businesses and nonprofits used to drain government aid programs.

Walz testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in Washington, D.C., on March 4, over the alleged misuse of federal funds across Minnesota’s social services and Medicaid programs. Vice President JD Vance referred Walz and state Attorney General Keith Ellison to the National Fraud Enforcement Division earlier this year for a potential criminal investigation. Republicans argue the two enabled a fraud scandal that has metastasized across the state’s welfare system. Walz and Ellison acknowledge that taxpayer money was misused but insist Republicans are inflating the scope for political gain.

That fraud division is now a Senate vote away from becoming a permanent fixture at the Department of Justice. The House passed the bill 352 to 72 on Wednesday, with every “no” vote coming from Democrats. More than 140 House Democrats, including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, joined every Republican in support. Democrats voted to give permanent status to the very fraud division Vance had already used against their own governor, suggesting Minnesota’s fraud problem is harder to spin from inside the caucus than from a podium in St. Paul.

Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-Wyo.) didn’t hold back on what Minnesota has revealed. “What has come [out of Minnesota] over the last year, what has been exposed, is absolutely criminal in nature,” Hageman said, adding that fraud in other Democrat-run cities and states is likely “higher by an order of magnitude.”

Hennepin County just handed her something better than a talking point. A program built to comfort the supposed victims of immigration enforcement collapsed under the exact kind of fraud Minnesota’s leadership spent a year dismissing as a right-wing conspiracy theory.

Via Middle East Eye

The Palestinian Authority’s (PA) foreign ministry on Thursday condemned the US decision to bar Palestinian officials from attending the UN General Assembly for a second year in a row.

The US has denied Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas a visa to attend the UN General Assembly in New York next week, repeating a move that drew widespread criticism last year.

In a statement on Wednesday, the US State Department said it would extend visa restrictions to members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and officials with the Palestinian Authority (PA).

The Palestinian foreign ministry condemned the decision as an “unjustified measure that contradicts efforts to restore confidence, develop Palestinian-American relations, and create the necessary political climate for implementing the two-state solution and achieving peace and stability in the region”.

The State Department said it was extending the restrictions on PA officials as “a consequence of their failure to reform, contrary to their commitments to the United States, and their ongoing activities that undermine the prospects for peace”. Abbas is among those barred from entering the US for the gathering.

The Trump administration took the same step last year, preventing Abbas and other senior Palestinian officials from attending the General Assembly in person.

The decision prompted criticism of Washington’s role as host of the UN headquarters, and sparked calls for a major UN meeting on Palestine to be moved to Geneva. The UN General Assembly later voted 145-5 to allow Abbas to address the gathering remotely.

As part of its justification for once again barring Palestinian officials, the US explicitly cited Palestinian efforts to pursue Israel through international courts and secure greater international recognition for a Palestinian state.

The Palestinian Authority was “taking actions to internationalize the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including through the International Criminal Court (ICC) and International Court of Justice (ICJ) [and] seeking to bypass negotiations through seeking unilateral recognition,” the State Department said.

In response, the Palestinian foreign ministry rejected the US claim that the “Palestinian people’s recourse to the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court constitutes an act that undermines peace.

In an unexpected & deeply ironic development, Iran’s leadership will be in New York…

The U.S. has approved visas for Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and other officials to attend next week’s UN General Assembly meetings in New York despite the two countries being locked in a six-month-long war.

The State Department said Iran’s… pic.twitter.com/m2CSEppDsp

— Clash Report (@clashreport) September 17, 2026

“Resorting to international institutions and international law is a legitimate right of the State of Palestine and a peaceful and legal means to protect our people and their rights, and cannot be equated with the policies of occupation, settlement, annexation, displacement, and settler violence, which constitute the real danger to the two-state solution and to the chances for peace,” the statement added.

The move again places Washington and Israel at odds with much of the international community over Palestinian diplomatic representation and statehood. Palestine is recognized by 157 UN member states, more than 80 percent of the organization’s membership.

The US decision also comes amid escalating Israeli settler violence and displacement in the occupied West Bank. The UN said in August that settler violence had reached “unprecedented levels”, with more than 1,430 incidents documented in 2026 by August 10.

Against a backdrop of resource nationalism, Beijing surrounding Taiwan with a record number of ships and raising blockade risks, an ongoing trade war, and President Trump challenging BRICS, the US military is disrupting China’s access to cheap crude oil from countries such as Venezuela and Iran. This is merely the US response after Beijing spent the last 1.5 years depriving the West of rare earths and other critical materials.

These developments provide context for an economic war that could one day spill over into a kinetic exchange, whether in the Pacific or around Taiwan. With that said, observers are closely watching China’s development of advanced military weaponry as conflict risks between the great superpowers rise.

Aviation researcher Andreas Rupprecht posted footage on LinkedIn that appears to show a prototype of China’s “next-generation” fighter jet, with new images suggesting potential progress toward operational status. 

Rupprecht provided an update on China’s J-36:  

Recent reports and photographs suggest that testing of China’s “next-generation” fighters has entered a new phase and offer clues to their eventual use.

I avoid the term “sixth generation” because, unlike “fifth generation,” it remains undefined: there is no consensus on the relevant criteria, and too little is known for confident classification. Labels such as “5.5th & “6th gen.” often serve more as media conversation-stoppers and marketing tools than as useful analysis.

First, the J-36. Since its surprise maiden flight in December 2024, its unusual three-engine configuration and tailless, diamond-shaped double-delta design have prompted speculation. At least four, possibly five, prototypes are flying and likely no. 04 was first spotted in July with a light-grey radome, suggesting an installed fire-control radar. Also, a poster at the ongoing 14th China International Defense Electronics Exhibition in Beijing shows an Acquisition, Tracking, and Pointing (ATP) system developed by the AVIC Beijing Precision Engineering Institute for Aircraft Industry beneath a J-36.

Soon after the maiden flight, competing theories emerged and I cautioned against premature conclusions but argued that the J-36 may embody a Chinese interpretation of future aerial warfare: extreme range, a large weapons load, and comprehensive sensors for long-range A2/AD missions as either an interceptor or a deep-penetration fighter aircraft.

According to Yang Wei, the new fighter can penetrate heavily defended airspace that the J-20 and comparable F-22s or F-35s must avoid, placing it a generation ahead. With lower RCS, high speed, and the capacity to control more drones, it could act as a node and command center for systems including J-20s and, especially, unmanned aircraft, while attacking high-value targets from stand-off range with long-range weapons.

I therefore disagree with Western analysts such as Justin Bronk, who rated the prototype not as China’s NGAD-equivalent sixth-generation fighter but as the fifth-generation regional bomber/strike project. In my opinion China has instead revealed its own concept of future air combat and a new generation of combat aircraft distinct from Western approaches.

The type could therefore represent a new class of “fighter.” Online terms include “theater-level deep-penetration command combat aircraft” and “high-performance fighter,” analogous to a cruiser ranking above a destroyer within the Navy. Recent evidence gives this theory new weight and warrants continued monitoring.

Last week, we covered China’s next-generation combat aircraft programs, touching on the J-50 and J-36, which are considered rivals to the US Air Force’s sixth-generation main fighter program, the F-47, being developed by Boeing.

The Shanghai Morning Post quoted a paper by researcher and chief flight-control designer Zhang Dong at the Shenyang Aircraft Design & Research Institute, a top Chinese military aircraft design organization. The paper said stealth fighter programs were undergoing a “leapfrog transformation from being able to fly steadily to being able to win in combat.”

What’s important to know is that economic warfare can escalate into kinetic warfare, meaning direct military action, particularly when one country views restrictions on, let’s say, crude or rare earths as a threat to national security.

In recent weeks, Taiwan’s main English-language daily newspaper, the Taipei Times, warned that China deployed a record number of ships around the island, suggesting that a potential blockade could become a major 2027 theme. This comes as the US depleted some of its most critical missiles and interceptors in the conflict in the Middle East.

Whether escalation or calm follows the Trump-Xi meeting in Washington next week remains to be seen. For now, the global situation suggests the world is on a critically dangerous path toward spillover risks as two conflicts rage across Eurasia.

Via The Cradle,

Israel is expected to seek “compensation” from the US in the form of weapons systems that Washington has so far declined to sell to Tel Aviv, in response to US plans to sell F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia in a $25 billion deal, Walla reported on 18 September.

A source familiar with the matter told the Hebrew news outlet that the Israeli military would prefer that no other country in West Asia receive the F-35 to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge (QME) in the region.

The deal marks the first time an Arab state gains access to the F-35, the US military’s most advanced warplane.

“This proposed sale will support the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a major non-NATO ally that is a force for political stability and economic progress in the Gulf region,” the State Department said in a statement on Thursday.

Even if the deal is signed soon, Saudi Arabia would receive its first F-35s only in five years and without all the enhancements Israel has for its fleet of the warplanes, US officials told Middle East Eye (MEE).

Using the deal as leverage, Tel Aviv intends to ask Washington to allow it to participate in the development and production of classified US weapons systems, including space-based weapons, the source speaking with Walla said.

Israel will also ask the US to participate in the development and production of some of its own weapons systems, including missile interceptors for the Arrow 4 and Arrow 5 systems.

Additionally, Israel wants access to advanced munitions that the Washington has so far declined to sell to Tel Aviv, including bunker-busting weapons designed to penetrate through mountains deep underground, autonomous strike systems, and swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles.

Israel may also seek funding to finance a third F-15 squadron and additional F-35 squadrons, which Israeli officials say they are currently struggling to do.

At the same time, the source speaking with Walla said that the Saudi purchase of F-35s would not threaten Israel’s qualitative military edge.

Israel continues to hold a clear operational advantage over other countries that have purchased the aircraft from the US due to the extensive operational experience accumulated by the Israeli Air Force and its pilots while carrying out the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and the bombing of Lebanon and Iran.

One Israeli defense official sought to play down concerns, saying that Israel’s advantage lies “not just in the machine, but mainly in the people.”

Tel Aviv has also received Washington’s approval to integrate Israeli-made weapons systems into its Adir aircraft, the Israeli version of the F-35.

MEE notes that the sale has raised concerns among some in the US defense and intelligence community who believe China could gain access to critical US technologies through espionage if Saudi Arabia is allowed to operate the warplane.

President Trump late in the day Friday issued a lengthy, and absolutely bombshell and historic (if true) Greenland-related post on Truth Social, after a long relative silence on what was early on a core priority of his administration.

He has announced that United States has entered into a security agreement with Denmark and Greenland to control the resource rich autonomous territory claimed by Denmark – though at this early stage (and it being night time in Europe) it is anything but clear whether there’s actually confirmation and agreement to this on the European side of things.

The agreement would grant the United States “permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland,“ Trump wrote. He characterized the agreement as adequately addressing longtime White House concerns. But this sounds like it could be sovereignty move, or the creeping beginnings of it.

“At my direction, we worked with representatives of Denmark and Greenland to guarantee that the United States will FOREVER have the complete ability to do what is necessary in Greenland in order to secure and defend the security of Greenland, and the United States of America,” the president’s post states.

The kicker is that the agreement blocks ‘forever’ (apparently) Russia, China, or all other non-NATO nations from establishing military bases or placing troops in Greenland.

What’s next is a process of initiating an indefinite American military presence on what is the world’s largest island mass. Again, assuming this doesn’t trigger some kind of mass European objection and potential inter-NATO renewed spat.

“This solution is a great one for the United States of America, Denmark, Greenland, and all of our Allies,” the post adds. “We look forward to working with the wonderful people of Denmark and Greenland toward a magnificent future with respect to this large, and highly strategic, parcel of land. We will be very protective of it!”

Given that in many other instances Trump’s social media posts often prove too out front and premature to any actual final agreement, it will be interesting to see what the Danish and EU response to this is.

At this early point, not even Greenland itself has responded to the big Trump unveiling – and so Greenland officials may be waking up tomorrow to a big surprise.

So does the other side actually know the contents of the ‘agreement’ that was just declared?

Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,

A Senate Democrat on Sept. 17 blocked Republicans from moving to immediate passage on the Ratepayer Protection Act, a House-passed law that would encourage states to require data centers to pay for their own energy costs.

The bill previously passed the House in a 417-3 vote on Wednesday evening.

Though progressives in the lower chamber had expressed concerns about the bill’s lack of enforcement mechanisms, the faction ultimately backed the bill. It seemed on track for a painless passage of the Senate under unanimous consent, a procedure that allows uncontroversial bills to pass quickly.

The bill was introduced on the Senate floor Thursday by Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), the bill’s sponsor in the upper chamber, who noted that as many as 1,000 new data center constructions are expected in the United States in the next five years.

“Americans are becoming ever more reliant on computing power from data centers for their daily lives, from medicine to manufacturing, education to agriculture, national defense, and the way we deliver basic services. Data centers are used not just for AI; they support almost every aspect of modern life, including online shopping, streaming video, social media, and the broadcast of this very debate.”

The law would require states to consider the adoption of models to require data centers to fund their own energy within a year, but would set no requirements that states ultimately adopt those models.

Husted moved for unanimous consent to pass the legislation and was blocked by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), who said that the bill to address this topic should have more stringent federal enforcement mechanisms.

“It’s not enough for us to tell states to consider making data centers pay for grid updates. Rather than voluntary pledges or suggestions to states, Congress needs to pass real legislation with real teeth,” Heinrich said.

Heinrich noted that for many Americans, utility rates had already increased – and that such Americans wouldn’t gain relief from the state opt-in process of the Ratepayer Protection Act.

Instead, he proposed consideration of his bill, the Grid Savings Act, “to require – not a voluntary agreement – to require large-load customers like data centers to pay for the facilities needed to connect them to the grid. Not to consider it, not to make pledges – to actually do it, to pay for the upgrades they need.”

Data centers are top of mind for many American voters this year.

The data centers used to power artificial intelligence (AI) services such as ChatGPT, Claude.ai, Grok, and others – aside from their extensive land requirements – require massive amounts of energy.

Estimates indicate that currently, data centers use about 4 percent of the U.S. electric grid, according to online energy shopping and consultation platform Electric Choice.

The energy used to power these facilities, which draw roughly 176 terawatt-hours of electricity per year, could otherwise be used to power 16 million homes, according to Electric Choice.

The Energy Department and other analysts have estimated that that share could skyrocket to 12 percent of the national power grid in the coming years.

Despite promises by many data centers to provide their own power, residents in areas where such centers have been built have reported spikes in their energy bills.

Anxiety over the possibility of such utility price jumps has driven many voters to be skeptical or outright hostile to the construction of such facilities in their area.

Likewise, cooling the computers that execute AI queries requires significant amounts of water, raising fears that energy might not be the only utility cost affected by the data centers.

Other residents living near data centers have also reported that the facilities are noisy. According to these residents, the massive fan and cooling system used to keep the servers from overheating is loud enough to travel through walls and disturb sleep.

Could runaway artificial intelligence (AI) spark a future WW3?

We don’t need movies like Terminator 2 and its SkyNet to help us imagine this, it’s 2026 and there is already a terrifying real-world precedent that could have kicked off a shooting war with nuclear-armed China.

A human analyst within the US intelligence community utilized data gathered by AI for a report that was later widely circulated across classified Pentagon channels, except that the chatbot which was relied upon in effect hallucinated nuclear weapons components being transported aboard a Chinese vessel bound for Iran.

Naturally this set off the highest alerts in Washington in the middle of an active hot war which President Trump launched ostensibly to prevent this very thing – Iran obtaining a nuke and atomic weapons components.

From there military planning kicked into high gear, with a special forces boarding operation imminent. Supposedly elite assets were already airborne, ready to descend on the Chinese ship in question.

But then, “the operation was halted only after officials took a closer look at the intelligence report and discovered that it had been produced with assistance from an AI chatbot,” CNN reports in a bombshell Friday exclusive. The episode reportedly happened last spring.

The severe error was realized with barely enough time to call off what could have been the geopolitical blunder and disaster of the century, “The chatbot had incorrectly identified the material the vessel was carrying.“

In essence the United States found itself based on completely manufactured ‘intel’ potentially headed for conflict with China.

As if to to preempt anyone who might be tempted to think the account is merely being hyperbolic or needlessly sensational, one official (unnamed) source told CNN that the intelligence assessment, which was “entirely false” – in the end “almost started a war.“

While Pentagon leadership, including US Special Operations Command Pacific, has yet to respond to CNN’s queries, the outlet pieces together the alleged chain of events and how this could have possibly happened in the following:

In this particular instance, the analyst queried a chatbot about some intelligence reporting on the ship’s manifest that originated with US Special Operations Command Pacific, based in Hawaii. It was not clear whether the chatbot was a commercially available one or a US government product.

“The internal tools are mostly just copies of the commercial stuff wearing lipstick,” a former senior US official familiar with the AI systems used by military and intelligence analysts.

The bot fused together open-source intelligence with secret signals intelligence in government holdings and reached its fateful conclusion about the material the ship was carrying.

The analyst then used AI again to package the findings into a standard intelligence report — the kind that is trusted by military officials — and disseminated it.

The report seems to be suggesting that the unknown AI tool that was utilized would be deemed substandard and weak for such an important assessment in the first place.

Further “comforting” for readers is that given heavy AI-integration seems the “irreversible” trend of the day across the DoD/Depart of War and IC, similar near-misses in the near and distant future are bound to happen.

CNN underscores, “Across the US military and the intelligence community, officials are pushing to weave AI into nearly every facet of their work, from analyzing the huge volumes of raw intelligence the US collects and selecting targets for strikes, to more mundane applications like managing budgeting, logistics and supply chains.”

Meanwhile, another botched AI job perhaps?…

SCOOP: A shipment of F-35 parts, including a canopy, wound up in Hong Kong — sparking an investigation on Capitol Hill and raising the possibility that China could have access to key components of the highly-classified program.

with @marksatter https://t.co/Y0ufsqEcY0

— Audrey Decker (@audrey_decker9) September 18, 2026

So apparently it’s not just lazy college undergrads who’ve become over-reliant on AI as a substitute for deep research and critical thinking, but now we apparently have a generation of US INTELLIGENCE ANALYSTS making potentially world-altering mistakes with the technology.