92.6 F
Chicago
Friday, September 4, 2026
Home Blog Page 944

Turkey’s First Domestic-Made Main Battle Tank Enters Service, Erdogan Hails Defeat Of Embargoes

0
Turkey’s First Domestic-Made Main Battle Tank Enters Service, Erdogan Hails Defeat Of Embargoes

Turkey has officially delivered its first domestically produced Altay tanks to the armed forces, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced during the opening of the BMC Ankara Tank and New Generation Armored Vehicles Production Facility on Tuesday.

The Altay is the country’s first homegrown main battle tank, and is being mass-produced at the Ankara plant operated by Turkish automaker BMC.

Via BMC

Erdogan in remarks touted that the tanks underwent an extensive testing process, involving traversing over 20,000 miles and 3,700 testing iterations involving live-fire exercises, before being handed over to the military.

Erdogan further highlighted that the production facility, which Turkish media says spans over 63,000 square meters, will be capable of manufacturing eight Altay tanks and ten Altug armored vehicles each month.

There have been many years in the recent past which Turkey, despite having the second largest army in NATO, was under sanctions by European nations, particularly over its long-running war the the Kurdish PKK.

At the peak of Turkey and Kurdish violence in the 1990s and into the 2000s, and amid criticisms out of Europe, this incentivized Turkey to get more serious about ramping up its domestic defense sector.

“We continue to write a legend with our state-of-the-art air, land, and sea vehicles,” Erdogan said Tuesday. “We are no longer just a state that follows – we are a state that is followed.”

Erdogan alluded precisely to the question of international sanctions, saying the “goal with the Altay tank is to avoid dependency on critical materials.”

BMC Handout via AA File Photo

“We have reached this stage despite the embargoes, and God willing, we will successfully carry the process forward,” he said. “The obstacles placed in our path may slow us down, may delay us a little, but they will never prevent us from reaching our destination.”

Turkish media has featured some of the new Altay main battle tank’s specs and capabilities as follows:

  • Aselsan has integrated multiple critical systems into the Altay. The VOLKAN-II tank fire control system provides precision targeting capabilities. The remote-controlled weapon system enables engagement of targets at extended ranges with accuracy.
  • The tank command control information system establishes the tactical network backbone for the Altay platoon and company-level operations. The Internal Communication System ensures seamless crew coordination during combat operations.
  • The tank laser warning system alerts crew members to laser-based targeting threats in real-time. The tank driver vision System provides the driver with enhanced situational awareness and visibility in all lighting conditions.
  • Soldiers’ Second-Sight Vision Sub-Unit enhances gunner targeting accuracy and extended-range target identification capabilities.

Via Daily Sabah

More images of the country’s new line of armor in action…

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/29/2025 – 04:15

Trade Secrets Vs. Rare Earths: EU Faces Chinese Pressure As U.S. Moves

0
Trade Secrets Vs. Rare Earths: EU Faces Chinese Pressure As U.S. Moves

Submitted by Thomas Kolbe

China is responding increasingly aggressively to mounting trade pressure from Washington. The practice of forcing even German companies to hand over trade secrets in exchange for rare earths exposes the Chinese leadership’s coercive stance. For Europeans, it is high time to align with the U.S.

For months, German firms with a need for rare earths have faced growing pressure from regulators in China: to maintain access to this critical group of raw materials, they are compelled by Chinese authorities to disclose sensitive operational and supply chain data—a form of technological tribute that creates long-term strategic dependencies and extracts know-how from German industry under Beijing’s state coercion.

Of course, this practice applies to companies from other EU states as well. Germans are by no means alone in being forced to surrender economic sovereignty.

Everything Is Exposed

According to an analysis by Bloomberg Law, the catalog demanded by Chinese authorities includes precise data and detailed information on internal production processes, customer lists, end uses, and supply chains. Everything potentially useful to Chinese competitors is laid bare.

In one case, German trader Magnosphere reported that Chinese authorities requested confidential data, including product and manufacturing details, before issuing export licenses.

Another example: European chemical and specialty materials group Solvay recently announced plans to expand its rare earth production capacity in La Rochelle, precisely because dependence on China is a threat.

In short, German companies face a choice: raw materials or sovereignty, with the risk of massive production disruptions if Beijing restricts exports. German automakers, in particular, are acutely aware of this issue—the conflict is escalating and will not vanish amid China’s economic and domestic political struggles.

China’s economy is caught in a deflationary spiral, unemployment is rising, and American pressure on the Chinese export model forces the political leadership to implement rapid course corrections.

It was foreseeable that the Communist Party would leverage every available geopolitical instrument in such a situation.

China Dominates the Market

The dispute over rare earths, now a strategic battleground in the geopolitical power struggle of major players, reveals their fundamental importance to the modern economy: they are the nervous system of industrial manufacturing. No neodymium, no aircraft production, no electric mobility, no artificial intelligence.

China has so far controlled up to 90% of global processing of this group of raw materials. About 60% of known deposits are located in Chinese territory.

The European Union remains largely powerless in this power play. Through subsidized recycling programs and its own partnership initiative, it seeks to secure access to rare earths worldwide. Yet here, as in trade policy vis-à-vis the U.S., it is equally ineffective. Today, the entire geopolitical focus is on the U.S.-China conflict. Europe is marginalized.

U.S. Sets Facts

U.S. President Donald Trump has begun dismantling the strategic dependency the U.S. faces, similar to the EU. By threatening Chinese exports to the U.S. worth $300 billion with additional 100% tariffs, he forced Beijing onto the defensive.

China had threatened to choke high-tech supply chains. Then came Trump’s 72-hour turnaround. While the EU scrapes its last reserves to sustain the lost Ukraine conflict and entangles itself in regulatory debates, Americans created facts.

A raw materials agreement was signed with Malaysia, Thailand inked a processing deal, and Australia committed billions to developing new mines. Mining rights in Cambodia were also secured.

Alternative Trade Formation

An alternative network of supply locations is emerging, with the potential to break China’s rare earth market dominance for the first time in 30 years. Trade flows are shifting at rapid speed: U.S.-China trade is shrinking sharply, with Chinese exports to the U.S. down about 27% this year, while ASEAN business booms. Washington is leveraging its massive domestic market—about a quarter of the global economy—as a geopolitical tool.

Trump’s message to partner states is clear: either play by our rules and gain access to the U.S. market on our terms, or face Beijing alone. Even if this requires your companies to hand over patents and trade secrets to secure measured supplies of scarce resources from China.

“Choose Your Fighter!” is now the Europeans’ stark reality.

EU Should Join Forces with the U.S.

The EU should urgently reconsider its stance toward Washington. On its own, energy-dependent and resource-poor Europe cannot free itself from China’s grip. Beijing’s leverage is enormous. Europeans currently watch passively as China turns its export engine into a dumping ground for shrinking U.S. trade and systematically crushes local companies with massive subsidies and state export guarantees.

Europe should align with Washington and accept American conditions for true free trade. This means finally abandoning typical European protectionism: the climate regulatory jungle, technocratic harmonization catalogs, and a dangerously aggressive censorship policy targeting U.S. tech companies.

In short: Europe must decide whether to remain a powerless regulatory advocate or challenge Chinese power alongside the U.S., playing by its rules rather than bowing helplessly.

* * * 

About the author: Thomas Kolbe, born in 1978 in Neuss/ Germany, is a graduate economist. For over 25 years, he has worked as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/29/2025 – 03:30

US Excludes Rosneft Germany From Russia Sanctions, Floats 6-Month Window

0
US Excludes Rosneft Germany From Russia Sanctions, Floats 6-Month Window

Germany’s Economy Minister told Reuters on Tuesday that the Trump administration had provided written confirmation that the German division of Russia’s Rosneft would be excluded from new American energy sanctions, since the assets are no longer under Russian control.

Economy Minister Katherina Reiche said Washington had sent a “Letter of Comfort” acknowledging that Rosneft Deutschland had been completely separated from its Russian parent company. Further, the United States has reportedly given Germany six months to resolve the issue of how Rosneft’s German assets will be managed, Bloomberg has reported.

Via dpa

In the meantime a temporary restricted license for Rosneft Deutschland is under consideration, which Berlin is heavily reviewing. The company holds stakes in three German refineries, representing around 12% of the country’s total refining capacity.

Berlin has thus far refrained from full nationalization of the assets on fears that this drastic action could prompt severe retaliatory measures by Moscow against German companies still operating in Russia.

Earlier in the week, Germany’s Economy ministry sought to assure, “The government is in contact with relevant authorities in Washington.”

Berlin has been arguing that the new sanctions should avoid targeting Rosneft’s subsidiaries in Germany as they remain “decoupled from their Russian parent company.”

Financial Times has pointed out there could be serious domestic political ramifications hanging in the balance:

The PCK refinery, in the north-eastern German town of Schwedt, is of particular concern, one person familiar with the assets said. Sitting atop the Druzhba pipeline, about 4,000km from central Russia, it accounts for more than 12 per cent of Germany’s refinery capacity, making it one of the largest oil processing companies in the country.

The threat to the refineries is yet another challenge for the German government, which is struggling to reignite a stagnant economy grappling with high energy prices — the costly legacy of previous chancellors to shut down nuclear plants and to rely on cheap Russian energy imports.

The PCK refinery also poses a political problem for the ruling coalition between Merz’s Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats: it is a large employer in the former communist state of Brandenburg, where support for the far-right Alternative for Germany party has surged.

As Politico notes of the fresh US sanctions, “Donald Trump’s surprise move to sanction Russia’s largest oil companies won’t paralyze Vladimir Putin’s war machine — but it will help the EU kick Russian oil out of the bloc for good.”

Last week, he announced the “tremendous” new sanctions targeting Russia’s Lukoil and its state-owned Rosneft, and “The details of the new measures are still being worked out. But in theory, they threaten to force the two firms to sell their assets and end their remaining oil pipeline supplies to Europe.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/29/2025 – 02:45

Mass Killings Reported, Many Thousands Trapped, As Key Sudanese City Seized By Militia

0
Mass Killings Reported, Many Thousands Trapped, As Key Sudanese City Seized By Militia

Via Middle East Eye

Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has stormed the North Darfur city of el-Fasher, prompting fears of widespread killings and abuses, hours after ceasefire negotiations in Washington collapsed. There were hopes late last week that the US-sponsored talks could achieve some sort of breakthrough.

However, sources told Middle East Eye that the UAE, which is the RSF’s most significant patron, refused to address the situation in el-Fasher, which has been under siege for over 500 days. On Sunday morning, RSF fighters entered the city, where around 260,000 people have been trapped, seizing an army base and causing the defenses to collapse.

RSF fighters celebrating in the streets of el-Fasher, Screengrab/AFP

The RSF claims it is in control of the city, describing its capture as a “decisive turning point”, after the paramilitaries had lost significant ground to the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in recent months.

So far, the SAF and its allied Joint Forces have not commented on the developments, despite videos emerging that purport to show the RSF detaining and lashing people in and around el-Fasher.

One video, which Middle East Eye was not able to independently verify, appeared to show fighters forcing some detained people to praise RSF leader Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, commonly known as Hemedti, before opening fire on them. Others, which MEE has also been unable to verify, seem to depict RSF fighters firing on fleeing civilians.

The RSF’s official media published footage of Abdul-Rahim Dagalo, Hemedti’s brother and second-in-command, addressing his toops from the Sixth Infantry base seized on Sunday.

Contact with people in el-Fasher has become very difficult, with people in the city only able to communicate to the outside through Starlink over recent months. However, MEE was able to reach military sources, local fighters and activists in the city’s pro-democracy Popular Resistance Committee, who said they are still fighting and that el-Fasher’s defenders made a tactical retreat from the Sixth Infantry garrison.

One of the fighters told MEE that the RSF attacked on Sunday with more ferocity than in any previous assault. “Serious fighting has erupted in el-Fasher in the past few days, with all kinds of weapons used – both sides using drones especially,” said the fighter, who is not being identified for security reasons. “However, the RSF’s heavy firing allowed them to enter the city through its eastern side after crushing our front checkpoints, barricades and trenches.”

Another fighter told MEE: “The majority of our forces have withdrawn from the base to the neighbourhood of al-Daraga in the north of the city, where we are in good control at the moment, and the fighting is still ongoing.”  

Rapid Support Forces fighters celebrate in the streets of el-Fasher, in video footage released on the RSF Telegram account on Sunday.

UAE controversy 

The storming of el-Fasher came just hours after ceasefire talks in Washington collapsed. The negotiations, which were sponsored by the Trump administration, included the UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, who alongside the US make up the Quad of states tasked with addressing the two-year Sudan war.

Also in Washington were SAF and RSF delegations, who refused to speak directly to each other. Diplomatic sources told MEE that any discussions about el-Fasher were shut down by the UAE, which supplies the RSF with weapons, funds and mercenaries.

The RSF, which has been accused of genocide elsewhere in Darfur, has surrounded el-Fasher with mines, prevented any aid from reaching its starving civilians and carried out massacres in displacement camps outside the city.

“The Emiratis did not want to describe the situation as a siege and said both sides were equally responsible for crimes in el-Fasher,” one diplomatic source told MEE. Two sources familiar with the talks said the SAF delegation rejected the UAE’s participation in the talks at all, seeing it as a belligerent.

After the talks collapsed, Sudanese Foreign Minister Mohi al-Din Salem, who was part of the SAF delegation, said: “If there is to be any dealing with the UAE, it will be as an enemy, not a mediator.” 

On Sunday, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres called on “all countries that are interfering in this war, and that are providing weapons to the parties to the war, to stop doing that”.

Diplomatic sources told MEE that Massad Boulos, Trump’s envoy for Arab and African affairs tasked with leading the negotiations, has been engaged in talks with Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the US-sanctioned head of the Sudanese army and government, since September.

“The two sides have put their conditions on the table. Massad has demanded SAF reduces the Islamist influence, stops bringing arms in from Iran and backs the Abraham Accords, as well as other measures like countering Russian and Chinese economic interests,” one of the diplomatic sources said. “On the other hand, Burhan has asked for the US to stop the UAE’s involvement, dismantle the RSF, or at least see the paramilitaries integrated within SAF, and also lift US sanctions from Sudanese officials.”

Sudan’s war began in April 2023 when tensions over plans to fold the RSF into the regular military exploded into a conflict that has killed tens of thousands of people and displaced 13 million others.

El-Fasher was the only SAF-held area in the vast region of Darfur, and its fall means Sudan has been divided in two, with the military-dominated government ruling the east from Port Sudan and the RSF’s rival administration in Nyala overseeing the west.

After the negotiations in Washington collapsed on Saturday, Boulos attempted to salvage something from the talks by posting photos on X of the Quad delegations and announcing a Joint Operational Committee “to strengthen coordination on urgent priorities”.

However, the next day, as details began to emerge of the assault on el-Fasher, he took to X again, this time calling on the RSF “to protect civilians and prevent further suffering”. He said, “The world is watching el-Fasher and the RSF’s actions with deep concern.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/29/2025 – 02:00

Is The US Planning To Wage An Intensified Proxy-War-Of-Attrition Against Russia?

0
Is The US Planning To Wage An Intensified Proxy-War-Of-Attrition Against Russia?

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Trump’s latest escalation against Russia took the form of imposing severe sanctions against its top two energy companies, canceling his planned meeting with Putin, and now declaring that they won’t meet again unless it’s to finalize a deal over Ukraine.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) wrote about the implications of his flip-flop here, insinuating that they presage an intensified US proxy war of attrition on Russia.

The present piece will briefly explore what form this could take and its likelihood of success.

The WSJ posits that “The drone revolution…means that neither side is likely to make major territorial strides soon”, but left unsaid is that this is also due to continued NATO support for Ukraine, including the bloc’s purchase of US weapons at full price for transfer to there per the new scheme from last summer.

Maintaining this de facto balance of drone and conventional forces, which is due to NATO’s indispensable support for Ukraine, is therefore the US’ top priority if wants to atrophy Russia’s strength with time.

The second part of what’s arguably Trump’s new three-phase strategy against Russia is to strictly enforce compliance with the latest sanctionsespecially when it comes to Russia’s Indian and Chinese partners that together comprise the RIC core of BRICS, in order to greatly reduce Russia’s foreign revenue flows. The purpose is to set the stage for socio-economic troubles in Russia while gradually eroding its Great Power status if India, China, and others start to keep it at arm’s length to avoid crushing punitive tariffs.

And finally, the last part aims to incite unrest within Russia by exacerbating its aforesaid socio-economic troubles through likely support for more Ukrainian long-range strikes against oil refineries and other critical infrastructure, believing that rapidly worsening living standards will turn the population against Putin.

The idea is that political pressure from below would complement economic, political, and military pressure from abroad to coerce him into freezing the front without any concessions from Ukraine.

Each part of Trump’s new three-phase strategy against Russia has its drawbacks.

Beginning with the first, the financial burden for maintaining the de facto balance of forces in this proxy war falls on Europe, some of whose states might prefer to reduce expenditures on US arms for Ukraine in favor of replenishing their stockpiles. There’s also growing interest in prioritizing the European military-industrial complex over the US’. It therefore can’t be taken for granted that the frontlines will hold indefinitely.

As for the second, it was explained here why India and China aren’t expected to fully stop importing Russian energy, namely because the spike in prices would harm their economic growth more than punitive US tariffs would. Neither also wants to dump Russia at the risk of their rival strengthening ties with it at what might then be their expense. While Russia’s foreign revenue flows might drop, its war chest can keep funding the conflict for a few more years at least, thus delaying the sanctions’ impact.

Lastly, the Russian people remained calm during much more difficult times in World War II and after the Soviet collapse than whatever they might experience from large-scale Ukrainian strikes against their critical infrastructure, so they’re not expected to engage in serious unrest.

The security services are also strong enough to deal with whatever might unfold in any case.

For these reasons, the US’ intensified proxy war of attrition against Russia likely won’t succeed, but it might still deal some damage.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/28/2025 – 23:25

Mapping Where Non-Citizens Receive The Most Food Stamps

0
Mapping Where Non-Citizens Receive The Most Food Stamps

As the federal government shutdown continues, millions of Americans risk losing access to food stamps beginning Nov. 1. Much of the attention has focused on the 42 million citizens who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but little coverage has been placed on non-citizens who also receive benefits.

Earlier this year, the conservative think tank Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC) revealed that nearly 1.5 million non-citizens received food stamps from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Another 2.2 million children living with non-citizens were also on food stamps. Given that this data was from fiscal year 2022, it’s likely this population of non-citizens leeching off American taxpayers is much higher, given the Biden-Harris regime’s globalist-aligned open-border invasion of third-worlders.

These nearly 1.5 million non-citizens collected a total of $4.2 billion in Food Stamp benefit payments,” EPIC’s Matthew Dickerson wrote in the note.

Dickerson continued:

California led the way in enrolling non-citizens on Food Stamps, with 273,000 in FY 2022. Florida had 238,000, New York 218,000, Texas 132,000, and Illinois 73,000 non-citizens. In contrast, Delaware, Mississippi, Montana, West Virginia, and Wyoming reported no non-citizens on Food Stamps.

The analyst emphasized, “Billions in Benefits for Illegal Aliens“…

Long-standing public charge policies of the United States have expected immigrants to be self-sufficient and not reliant upon government benefit programs.

Despite the public charge doctrine, the federal government provides billions in benefits each year to non-citizens, including illegal aliens. As the USDA notes, “undocumented individuals” are not supposed to be eligible for Food Stamps. However, the Biden-Harris Administration abused loopholes to confer “status,” such as parole or a deferral from deportation, to millions of illegal aliens, qualifying them for welfare programs as part of its catch-and-release agenda.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the surge in illegal immigration from Biden’s border policies will cause $15 billion in Food Stamp benefits to be paid to illegal immigrants and their children by FY 2024.

Securing the border is one of the most important priorities of the American people. The budget reconciliation process will allow Congress and the Trump Administration to take serious steps to crack down on the chaos at the border. This should include closing the loopholes and cutting off the billions in welfare benefits that are spent on illegal aliens.

Also, Democrats have been using the shutdown to pressure Republicans for the restoration of taxpayer-funded health insurance for illegal aliens. That funding was eliminated when Republicans delivered working families tax cuts that include no tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security, as well as major health care reforms that expand access and flexibility while reducing fraud and improper payments in the system.

It appears that illegals are a net drain on government services. 

Meanwhile, the American Federation of Government Employees, a labor union representing U.S. government employees, called on Democrats to support a GOP-backed funding bill to end the shutdown and avert further pain for the American people.

So, illegals are being propped up on the taxpayers’ dime, allowing Democrats to weaponize this population in future elections as part of their broader scheme to establish a one-party rule through mass illegal migration. Cut the food stamps and handouts to illegals, and perhaps these folks would simply return home. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/28/2025 – 23:00

Biden Official Worked With Chinese Influence Group To Undermine U.S. Tariff Negotiations

0
Biden Official Worked With Chinese Influence Group To Undermine U.S. Tariff Negotiations

Authored by Natalie Winters via Substack,

When President Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on Chinese goods, the Chinese Communist Party didn’t just retaliate with trade measures. It launched an information war, using American insiders to spread its narrative that tariffs were reckless and self-defeating.

One of the most prominent voices in that campaign is Rick Waters, a former senior U.S. diplomat who once directed the State Department’s China House.

Since leaving government, Waters has become a reliable messenger for Beijing’s preferred positions, appearing with CCP-linked influence groups and using Western media outlets to promote pro-China talking points that undermine Trump’s trade strategy.

From State Department Insider to Beijing’s Trusted Voice

In late 2024, Waters participated in an official interview for China–US Focus, a platform run by the China–United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF). In the interview, he called for “restraint” and “dialogue,” insisting that “both sides must avoid confrontation.” The phrasing matched Beijing’s diplomatic line word for word.

Shortly afterward, he appeared as a featured participant at the 2024 U.S.–China Hong Kong Forum, another CUSEF-organized event that gathered Chinese Communist Party officials, Hong Kong elites, and select Western figures for “private dialogue.” The agenda promised to explore “mutual respect” and “pathways to cooperation,” but the guest list told a different story.

CUSEF was founded by Tung Chee-hwa, a vice chairman of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, the advisory body that sits under the CCP’s United Front Work Department. The United Front is the arm of the Party responsible for foreign influence operations and elite recruitment.

The United Front: Beijing’s Hidden Ministry of Influence

Behind the polished language of “dialogue” and “mutual understanding” lies one of the CCP’s most dangerous tools of foreign interference: the United Front Work Department.

According to U.S. and allied intelligence reports, the UFWD operates as the Party’s “hidden ministry of influence.” It is tasked with guiding foreign elites, shaping overseas media narratives, and blurring the line between diplomacy, propaganda, and espionage.

The U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission calls it “the primary entity coordinating influence operations targeting foreign elites, media, and business leaders.”

Beijing’s own statements describe the department’s mission even more plainly: to “unite all possible forces” in service of China’s goals. In practice, that means cultivating Western politicians, academics, and journalists who can quietly normalize the CCP’s worldview inside democratic systems.

CUSEF: The Tip of the Spear

CUSEF serves as the frontline export of the United Front’s operations in the United States.

Founded in Hong Kong but deeply embedded in American institutions, it sponsors delegations of journalists, funds think tank partnerships, and organizes private roundtables with U.S. officials—all designed to project the image of “constructive engagement” while advancing Beijing’s interests.

A Senate investigation previously flagged CUSEF’s activities as a national security concern, citing its repeated attempts to “influence media narratives” and secure “favorable coverage” of China. Intelligence analysts describe it as “the tip of the spear” of Beijing’s foreign influence strategy—its charm offensive with a strategic purpose.

CUSEF’s Shadow Diplomacy and the National Security Risk

Waters’ participation in the Hong Kong forum raises serious counterintelligence questions. The event included private, unrecorded sessions between American participants and Chinese officials, giving Beijing a rare opportunity to map out U.S. policy networks, gauge internal divisions, and test new narratives through friendly interlocutors.

Even if Waters’ expenses or speaking fees were covered under “academic” pretenses, the optics are troubling. For a former diplomat with direct insight into Taiwan, trade, and intelligence coordination to accept travel or benefits from a foreign principal linked to an adversary state is a glaring breach of judgment.

Rooting for China in the American Press

After his involvement with CUSEF, Waters began amplifying Beijing’s messaging through major Western media outlets.

In an April 2025 feature for the Carnegie Endowment, he dismissed Trump’s tariffs as “unsustainable” and claimed Washington was “overestimating its leverage” while Beijing would “hold firm.” He painted China as disciplined and strategic, while portraying the United States as impulsive and politically motivated.

Around the same time, in an interview with the South China Morning Post, Waters declared that “anti-China sentiment in Washington does not equal consensus,” suggesting that Trump’s policies were extreme and unrepresentative of mainstream opinion. He emphasized “civil diplomacy” and “restraint,” phrases that echoed Beijing’s preferred messaging verbatim.

In NBC News, Waters repeated the claim that Trump’s tariffs were “backfiring” and “hurting U.S. consumers.” His framing, once again, aligned perfectly with the CCP’s argument that Washington’s pressure campaign was damaging its own economy.

Each appearance cast China as the rational actor and Trump’s America as the aggressor. Waters was not analyzing U.S. policy; he was defending Beijing’s narrative.

Beijing’s Propaganda Echo Chamber

Chinese state media quickly took note.

The China News Service, an outlet overseen by the United Front Work Department, amplified Waters’ remarks and quoted him directly, highlighting his claim that “the tariff war is not about winning.” His words were used to validate Beijing’s portrayal of the United States as disorganized and self-defeating.

The Real Trade War Was Always About Influence

Rick Waters’ trajectory—from Biden’s China House to CUSEF panels to favorable coverage in Chinese state outlets—reveals how Beijing uses credibility, flattery, and access to infiltrate America’s information ecosystem.

Trump’s tariffs targeted China’s economy. Beijing’s response targeted America’s elite class.

And in that quiet war for narrative control, the CCP didn’t need spies in the traditional sense. It needed insiders willing to speak its language.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/28/2025 – 22:35

‘Showing Up In Droves’ – Gen Z Trades Graduation-Caps For Hard-Hats

0
‘Showing Up In Droves’ – Gen Z Trades Graduation-Caps For Hard-Hats

Authored by Mary Prenon via The Epoch Times,

With college costs climbing and artificial intelligence reshaping office work, a growing number of Gen Zers are turning to construction, a new report shows. According to industry professionals, “They’re showing up in droves.”

The share of Generation Z workers—those aged 18 to 28—in the construction labor force more than doubled from 2019 to 2023, rising from 6.4 percent to 14.1 percent, according to an Oct. 10 report by the Home Builders Institute.

The share of millennials (age 29 to 44) grew to 37.7 percent from 35.7 percent over the same period. Conversely, the share of Baby Boomers (age 61 to 79) dropped to 14.2 percent from 20.6 percent as older workers moved into retirement.

The median age of construction workers during this period was 42.

The escalating cost of college, competitive wages in construction, innovation in construction technologies, and growth potential are prompting the younger generation to consider a career in the industry, according to the report.

“Even as a slowing housing market has eased some pressure off the tight labor market, attracting skilled labor, especially younger generations, remains the primary long-term goal for the construction industry,” the report states.

As of the end of 2023, approximately 71 percent of the U.S. construction labor force consisted of Gen Xers and millennials.

‘Some Have College Educations’

Fraser Patterson, founder and CEO of Skillit, a New York City-based nationwide construction industry hiring platform, told The Epoch Times that the company’s data indicate a strong trend toward younger workers entering the industry.

“We have demographics on hundreds of thousands of workers and there’s a clear shift toward Gen Z and millennials,” he said. “Some have college educations and some have completed apprenticeships, but they’re showing up in droves.”

Patterson said that for years, college has been promoted as the singular approach to attaining a middle-class lifestyle.

“But with the cost of education today, we see more and more younger people entering the workforce after high school to earn while they learn,” he said.

For those without previous construction experience, trade schools or apprenticeships represent the most common path to a career in construction. Many companies are now starting to offer entry-level positions in which employees receive on-the-job training.

Construction Jobs Safe From AI

As more industries embrace technology, Patterson noted that many tasks are being taken over by AI or outsourced globally. However, he said that construction work is “hyperlocal and AI cannot replace skilled work requiring judgement and hands-on labor.”

Michael Culnen, founder and CEO of Vermont consulting firm Construction Concepts, agrees.

He said that many professional roles are increasingly moving to AI and cheaper global workers, but construction is still one of the few fields in which work is indispensable and resistant to automation.

“Unlike many professional roles, construction cannot be outsourced, automated, or entirely replaced by AI,” he told The Epoch Times. “It offers immediate income, tangible results, and stability without requiring years of schooling or accumulating debt.”

Culnen said he believes that many Gen Z men and women are choosing this field because it provides an accessible path to generating income quickly and securing a stable livelihood.

“This new trend comes at a time when the current U.S. labor workforce is aging out at an alarming rate and needs new young talent to train up into the next wave of skilled physical labor,” Culnen said.

Patrick Murphy, chief investment officer at Miami-based Coastal Construction, told The Epoch Times: “Younger people seem to have a whole different approach to construction today than when my grandfather and father were starting out in the industry.

“The younger generations seem to look at it from a tech perspective.”

Murphy noted that Gen Zers are eager to know more about a building’s “smart” features, as well as the design aspects.

This year alone, the company took on about 50 interns and often hired entry-level positions requiring no previous construction experience.

While jobs such as electrician, plumber, and other skilled positions require formal training, new construction employees with little or no experience can often learn on the job.

Wages Keep Growing

“Some of our highest-paid construction workers are making over $100,000 a year with just a high school degree,” Murphy said. “They can make a great living and it’s a tangible experience so they can see the results of their work.”

According to the Home Builders Institute report, wages in the construction industry continued to grow, often outpacing typical earnings in other industries. Quoting data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the report indicates that the average hourly rate increased by 3.7 percent in July from a year earlier, to $39.70 per hour.

Earnings varied across the country, with Alaska, the Pacific Coast states, Illinois, Minnesota, and most Northeast states recording the highest hourly rates.

As of April, 14 states reported average earnings of more than $40 per hour, with Alaska and Massachusetts averaging more than $50.

The report also shows that year-over-year, Nevada, Mississippi, Alaska, Colorado, Texas, Florida, South Carolina, and Montana reported the fastest-growing hourly wages in the construction industry, more than doubling the national average growth of 3.6 percent. Nevada reported the largest increase of 10.6 percent.

Among construction trades, elevator installers and repairers earn the top median salaries at more than $108,000 per year, with the top 25 percent earning more than $133,000. Plumbers and electricians earn up to $81,700, while pile drive operators typically earn at least $105,000.

‘A Respected Career’

Aaron Shavel, a civil engineer at the Alliance for Innovation and Infrastructure, told The Epoch Times that the previous stigma around the trades is changing.

“Rising college costs and strong construction wages are making young people see this as a respected career, not a fallback,” he said.

“Union and non-union jobs in construction and infrastructure provide solid wages, strong benefits, and in many cases, six-figure earning potential.”

He also noted that the industry is in need of younger people to replace those who will be retiring soon.

“More than half of today’s construction workforce is expected to retire by 2036, even as demand keeps growing for people to build everything from energy projects and data centers to transportation and housing,” he said.

Shavel said he believes that the industry should continue to invest in training, apprenticeships, and other programs to encourage younger people to consider construction as their career choice.

Paul Iaccarino, director of the Building Trades Educational Benefit Fund based in Long Island, New York, operates one of the state’s largest apprenticeship programs for union electricians with the United Service Workers Union Local 363.

“This program exemplifies how non-traditional work experience can launch debt-free careers that are hands-on, mentally demanding, and resilient to automation,” he told The Epoch Times.

The program is completely free for apprentices, and as members of Local 363, they are paid as full-time employees. All costs for the program are picked up by the Building Trades Educational Benefit Fund.

The hands-on approach includes everything from installing Wi-Fi in subways one week to upgrading hospital energy systems the next.

“These young adults rack up thousands of hours of classroom and on-the-job training while earning full-time salaries, pensions, and benefits, without taking on a dime of student loan debt,” Iaccarino said.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/28/2025 – 21:45

Senate Judiciary Launches Probe Into Gates Foundation’s Alleged Funding Of Chinese Military Fronts

0
Senate Judiciary Launches Probe Into Gates Foundation’s Alleged Funding Of Chinese Military Fronts

Scrutiny of the nonprofit world is increasing by the week. Regarding the Gates Foundation, rumblings surfaced in late August when the foundation abruptly severed ties with the Arabella network. This is the same network that bankrolls color-revolution-style operations run by No Kings partners, also known as the permanent protest-industrial complex.

Now, congressional pressure is mounting on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa launched an investigation into the foundation’s alleged funneling of tens of millions of dollars in grants to entities tied to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), raising serious concerns over potential violations of U.S. tax laws governing 501(c)(3) world. 

“According to recent reports, the Gates Foundation, through grants and direct payments, have funded the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its allies. I am writing today to ask you whether these reports are true or not and, if true, how your organization’s conduct comports with 501(c)(3) requirements,” Grassley wrote in the letter. 

Grassley cited several media reports that suggested in 2023 the Gates Foundation directed:

  • $11.7 million to various arms of China’s government,

  • $2 million to a corporation linked by the U.S. Department of Defense to the Chinese military,

  • and $6.7 million to state-run universities that support Xi Jinping’s regime

Grassley noted the foundation’s 2022 tax filings that showed, according to the senator, “the nonprofit provided approximately $23 million in funding to over 20 different Chinese entities, some of which were labeled as “foreign governments.” 

These payments were reportedly categorized as public health or research initiatives. However, IRS regulations prohibit 501(c)(3) charities from directly supporting foreign governments. This means the foundation would have to obtain IRS determination letters or equivalency determinations to ensure that foreign grants serve charitable purposes and do not violate Sections 4942 or 4945 of the IRS Code.

Grassley continued:

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) provides tax-exempt status for entities that are organized and operated exclusively for a charitable purpose.5 A 501(c)(3) organization may lose its tax-exempt status for failing to pursue the exempt purpose it described in its application to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 6 With regard to activity in foreign countries, IRS guidance states that “direct grants to foreign governments do not serve IRC 501(c)(3) purposes.” 7 Thus, in order to maintain tax exempt status, an organization’s activities must be charitable in nature and may not directly support or promote the interests of a foreign government.8 Further, according to IRS guidance, private foundations “can distribute funds to foreign organizations to conduct activities outside of the United States, but must follow special rules when dealing with foreign organizations to avoid the excise taxes under Section 4942 and Section 4945. 

Grassley asked Gates Foundation CEO Mark Suzman to provide detailed documentation about these questionable grants :

  1. Are the reports that the Gates Foundation funded Chinese government projects and initiatives, including potentially Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects, accurate? Please explain.

  2. How many foreign projects has the Gates Foundation funded in the last five years? Did any of these projects provide direct or indirect funding to foreign governments? Provide a list of projects and provide all records

  3. When determining whether or not to fund projects and initiatives in a foreign country, what criteria does the Gates Foundation use to make that decision? Provide all records.

  4. Did the foreign organizations the Gates Foundation has awarded grants to provide an IRS determination letter that it is a “recognized exempt organization” or did the Gates Foundation obtain an equivalency determination from a qualified tax practitioner? If so, provide the IRS determination letter or equivalency determination for each organization. If neither an IRS determination letter nor equivalency determination was provided, what procedures has the Gates Foundation put in place to exercise expenditure responsibility consistent with IRC 4945(h)? Provide all records.

  5. Have any of the expenditures the Gates Foundation made to foreign organizations resulted in a tax under IRC 4945 or IRC 4942? Provide all records

Via Judicial Watch in a 2021 X post: 

Commenting on Grassley’s letter, civil terrorism expert Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising

While I fully support this effort and am encouraged to see the Senate calling out the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for funneling funds into the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and I’m glad to see the Senate taking seriously the role of nonprofits in safeguarding national security and tax-compliance, this acknowledgement in the letter from the Judiciary Committee is only the beginning of the process. The next phase must be significantly more aggressive: the Executive Branch needs to take the baton and escalate into the enforcement stage — scrutinizing grants, auditing tax-exempt status, applying relevant sanctions, and ensuring full transparency around foreign funding flows. Without concrete administrative follow-through and regulatory action, this letter risks ending as a warning rather than a real deterrent.

Beyond the Gates Foundation, it’s likely that Senator Grassley’s office is also scrutinizing CCP-linked billionaire Neville Roy Singham and his dark-money network, which has allegedly funded color-revolution-style operations against President Trump. 

Meanwhile, the broader far-left NGO ecosystem remains a lawless environment – one that is orchestrating regime-change against Trump and MAGA, aiming to seize power in a Marxist takeover. 

The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore: these dark-money NGOs are the ones pulling the strings of the deep state, hence the White House’s declaration of war against them.

*  *  * 

Grassley’s full letter:

Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/28/2025 – 21:20

Senate Committee Seeks Answers From NBA On Gambling Investigations

0
Senate Committee Seeks Answers From NBA On Gambling Investigations

Authored by Jackson Richman via The Epoch Times,

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation is seeking answers from the NBA regarding gambling scandals that have engulfed the league.

In an Oct. 27 letter to NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the committee’s chairman, and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the committee’s ranking member, wrote that current and former NBA players and coaches have “compromised the game’s integrity.”

Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier was apprehended in relation to an illegal sports betting operation, while Portland Trail Blazers head coach Chauncey Billups was arrested in connection to a rigged poker scheme tied to the Gambino, Bonanno, and Genovese crime families.

Former NBA player Damon Jones was also apprehended. He was allegedly tied to both schemes.

“In light of the latest allegations of gambling-related corruption involving an NBA player, we write seeking more information about how the NBA investigated and handled these allegations as well as what steps the Association is taking to maintain the public’s trust,” wrote Cruz and Cantwell.

In the case involving Rozier, the defendants allegedly used insider information to make bets and profit, according to the indictment. This involved Rozier telling two co-defendants that he was going to remove himself from a game and not return, allowing his co-conspirators to place successful and fraudulent over-under bets on how many points he was going to score and other statistics.

Jones, as an unofficial assistant coach for the Los Angeles Lakers during the 2022–2023 NBA season, allegedly sold insider information to co-conspirators about a player not being on the court for a game ahead of the injury report being released to the public, according to the indictment. The player is believed to be Lakers superstar LeBron James, who has not been accused of wrongdoing. This allowed the bettors to make certain bets based on non-public information.

Billups is an unindicted co-conspirator in the rigging scheme where he sat key players for a Trail Blazers game against the Chicago Bulls. He had his team purposefully lose the game so that the team, which was out of playoff contention, could increase its chances of getting a higher draft pick, according to the indictment. The defendants bet on the Bulls winning the game based on the insider information they got.

Cruz and Cantwell acknowledged that the NBA has not had any role in rigging games and that the league has taken steps to combat fraudulent gambling by NBA players, such as banning former Toronto Raptors player Jontay Porter for life for being connected to a betting scheme. Porter pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and was sentenced to 15 months behind bars.

The senators noted the NBA found that Rozier did not violate league rules.

Cruz and Cantwell asked to know about the specifics of the NBA’s investigation and why Rozier was allowed to still play on the court.

“This is a matter of Congressional concern,” wrote the lawmakers.

“The integrity of NBA games must be trustworthy and free from the influence of organized crime or gambling-related activity. Sports betting scandals like this one may lead the American public to assume that all sports are corrupt.”

Cruz and Cantwell requested documents created between Jan. 1, 2020, and the present regarding the NBA’s policies on sports betting, gambling, and game rigging; any investigation by the league for violating the NBA’s rules on those three issues; and communications between the NBA and betting platforms.

They also requested documentation between that time period regarding how the NBA plans to combat sports betting, gambling, and game rigging; and the final report and other documents relating to the league’s probe of Rozier.

The Epoch Times has reached out to the NBA for comment on the letter.

Talking to reporters, Cruz said that the NBA gambling scandal “poses a grave threat to the integrity of sports.”

He added that “prop bets in particular are an ongoing challenge, and I expect Congress and the Commerce Committee in particular to examine them closely.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/28/2025 – 20:55