Utah-based defense tech firm Hypercraft has unveiled a 300 hp diesel-hybrid-electric unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) that can power directed-energy weapons, charge drones, and sustain a forward command post, all autonomously.

Defense Blog’s Dylan Malyasov reports that Hypercraft’s Razorback UGV can travel 280 miles on a single charge, reach speeds of 60 mph, and export 38 kilowatts of power, which is enough to power laser weapons and recharge drones.

Razorback is being positioned as a critical energy source for forward operating units that need power for drones, electronic warfare, ISR, counter-UAS systems, and communications. The UGV is also designed to move supplies and support infrastructure on the modern battlefield.

The role of UGVs on the battlefield is still being shaped in real time by the Russia-Ukraine war, where robots, whether ground bots or drones, are increasingly removing infantrymen from harm’s way as the grinding fight evolves into a war of attrition fought by machines.

The wars across Eurasia, from Ukraine-Russia to the U.S.-Iran conflict, have validated a new style of warfare in which cheap ground robots and drones increasingly operate in ‘no man’s land’ (front lines). The next phase is already coming: humanoid systems entering the battlespace as militaries look to push more machines, not infantrymen, into the kill zone.

Authored by Aaron Gifford via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

New organized labor reforms signed into law by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last week require a majority of members to be present for teachers union certification or recertification votes, increase fines for illegal strikes, and establish merit-based pay for educators.

In Idaho, after July 1, teachers unions will be prohibited from collecting dues directly from members’ paychecks, using paid time off for union activities, or recruiting new members during school hours.

A similar law in Arizona, which also bans teacher strikes and prohibits organized labor members from using any school property—even email addresses—for union activities, will be decided on by voters in the November election.

“They can’t consume taxpayer-funded resources during the school day,” said Rusty Brown, special projects director for the Freedom Foundation policy organization, which assisted state legislators with those measures and helps teachers opt out of union membership.

These ideas are expected to gain ground throughout the nation in the months and years ahead, Brown told The Epoch Times.

Individually, the Freedom Foundation’s Teacher Freedom Alliance has so far helped more than 272,535 teachers opt out of union membership, including more than 50,000 in 2025 alone, according to data provided to The Epoch Times. This includes educators in red and blue states.

At the state level, Oklahoma lawmakers have advanced legislation that would allow teachers to withdraw from a union at any time and would terminate “closed shop” provisions that prevent teachers from accessing alternative labor or professional organizations, such as the Teacher Freedom Alliance.

Brown calls this an “equal access and an end to a monopoly and captive audience bill.” Alternative organizations can offer teacher liability insurance and other benefits at a fraction of the price that traditional unions charge, he said.

Brown said he believes that the legislation could pass before Oklahoma’s session ends later this month, but the member withdrawal proposal probably won’t go through this session.

Alabama state lawmakers will consider legislation similar to Oklahoma’s next session, he said.

Maxford Nelsen, Freedom Foundation’s director of research and government affairs, said several factors prompted growing interest in pushing back against teachers unions. Members do not like that dues are automatically deducted from their paychecks. There is increasing animosity toward “zombie unions,” in which a limited number of members are informed or allowed to vote on matters. Labor organizations also engage in practices that create very narrow windows and bureaucratic hurdles for terminating membership.

“That’s the last thing they want to think about during their summer vacation,” Nelsen told The Epoch Times, citing one union’s requirement in which opt-outs were limited to the last 10 days of July.

Perhaps the most contentious issue, Nelson said, is how teachers union dues are spent. A review of the National Education Association and American Federation of Teachers unions’ websites shows that both heavily favor Democrats and promote transgender ideology; diversity, equity, and inclusion practices; special protections for illegal immigrants; anti-school choice measures; and other left-leaning policies.

“Hundreds of millions of dollars are flowing into this progressive apparatus,” Nelson said.

A recent report from Defending Education, a conservative policy center, states that teachers unions at the local, state, and national levels have spent more than $1 billion on “far-left political causes” unrelated to collective bargaining since 2015. This includes school board races, political action committees, and campaigns against school choice.

“Given the outsized role that unions have played in the education system over the past 50 years, greater transparency on union spending is absolutely critical so that policymakers and teachers themselves can make informed decisions about the role that these entities should—or should not—play in the future,” Defending Education President Nicole Neily said in an April 27 statement.

The Epoch Times reached out to the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers unions for comment.

In response to prior Florida legislation that prohibited teachers unions from deducting dues directly from paychecks, the Florida Education Association contracted with a company to withdraw dues from members’ bank accounts after their paychecks are deposited.

“This type of ‘paycheck deception’ legislation is nothing new and has been wielded across the country to weaken unions and roll back working conditions,” the Florida Education Association stated on its website. “It’s no secret that this legislation is designed to diminish our collective voice.”

The Idaho Education Association teachers union implemented a similar system. It also denounced Idaho Gov. Brad Little for refusing to veto the legislation.

“Idaho’s students and the dedicated professionals who teach them will be worse off because of his choice,” the union’s president, Layne McInelly, said in an April 10 statement. “They deserve better.”

The Freedom Foundation is scrutinizing public organized labor groups across the nation, not just teachers unions. In Oregon, it recently submitted a complaint to the state employment relations board on behalf of a union member who said dues were deducted from his paycheck without his authorization. He asked for a refund and requested to opt out of the union, only to be told that the window to do so is Aug. 8 through Sept. 9, according to documentation provided to The Epoch Times.

Nelsen did not work on that case but said this type of practice by unions is common in an era of direct deposits and withdrawals and digital forms.

“There are no mechanisms in place to verify that the individual workers have authorized the form, let alone understand it,” he said.

While the digital US economy, if proxied through the earnings growth and stock prices of AI companies and their “picks and shovels” support ecosystem, has never been stronger, the traditional US consumer, responsible for 70% of US GDP, has rarely been more depressed than right now (and according to the latest University of Michigan sentiment survey, Americans have literally never been more pessimistic). 

That was the take home message from the latest earnings week, when various executives across retail, restaurants and packaged goods indicated they are increasingly worried about US shoppers – especially those from the” lower half” of the K-shaped economy – with tighter budgets amid surging gas prices caused by the Iran war, and consumer electronics prices through the roof thanks to record memory chip prices.

“They’re literally running out of money at the end of the month,” Kraft Heinz CEO Steve Cahillane said in an interview with the WSJ . “We’re seeing negative cash flows in the lower-income brackets where they’re dipping into savings.” Sure enough, last week we showed that as a result of personal spending growth far outpacing personal income…

… the personal savings rate has collapsed to a 3 year low.

This underscores a remarkable trend: since the pandemic, Americans have continued to spend at surprising levels despite high inflation, keeping the US economy growing and thwarting recession fears, with much of the spending growth fueled by credit card debt, with February’s $10BN+ increase in credit card debt the highest since February 2024.

But soaring fuel costs might be the straw that breaks the overlevered camel’s back: “The war in Iran amplified consumer concerns about the cost of living,” Whirlpool. CEO Marc Bitzer said Thursday on a call with analysts. The maker of washers and dryers said it’s counting on purchases picking up after a harsh US winter slowed shopping, but the war caused a collapse in consumer sentiment. The company described the resulting 15% hit to industry demand as similar to the global financial crisis in the aughts. In other words a depression.

In fast food, McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski said confidence among shoppers isn’t improving and may be getting worse. The company cited “heightened anxiety” and gas prices that disproportionately impact low-income consumers.

Sit-down dining is also taking a hit. “Our price-sensitive, more value-oriented guests seem to be staying home a bit more,” Dine Brands CEO John Peyton said on an earnings call this week. The company, which owns the Applebee’s and IHOP chains, said it hasn’t seen a similar pullback in other income levels.

Meanwhile, eyewear retailer Warby Parker  said younger shoppers are feeling the pinch from higher-than-usual unemployment and student debt bills.

Gas prices, now at $4.56 a gallon on average, are at their highest levels since July 2022, according to data from the American Automobile Association. As shoppers put more of their income toward fuel, they have less money for discretionary spending like eating out. Enlarged tax refunds helped blunt some of the impact, but sentiment has still soured to a record low.

Americans are putting less away as they try to keep up, with the savings rate dropping in March to the lowest in three years. Meanwhile, economists warn the disruptions from the war in Iran could lead to higher prices for a range of goods over time, including groceries, putting even more pressure on low-income households and draining what little savings are left. 

Low-income consumers have already cut back on real gasoline consumption to try to limit costs, according to recent research published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

In the near term, Americans can draw down savings or tap credit cards, but the longer gas prices stay high, the more consumers will change their spending patterns to balance their budgets, said Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank.

Planet Fitness on Thursday fell the most on record after cutting its full-year outlook on weaker-than-expected member signups during the typically busy New Year period.

The gym chain also said it paused the national rollout of a price increase to its top-tier membership, with CEO Colleen Keating making it clear why that decision was made. “The consumer and economic backdrop have shifted,” she said.

Authored by Jonathan Turley via jonathanturley.org,

“Eff around and find out”: That taunt from Hakeem Jeffries celebrating Virginia’s gerrymander did not age well.

On Friday, the House minority leader found out that Virginia’s Supreme Court was not quite as gleeful as he about Democrats’ attempt to virtually eliminate Republican representation in the purple state.

The court just cooked the party’s infamous lobster, a district over 100 miles long that was designed to help devour the GOP’s slender majority in the House of Representatives.

It also cooked the ambitions of Gov. Abigail Spanberger and the Democratic establishment, which tossed aside any pretense of principle in a raw political gambit.

The resulting faceplant is nothing short of legendary: Spanberger’s Democrats have succeeded in alienating half of the state.

For the governor, the court’s decision was particularly embarrassing.

Before assuming power, Spanberger denounced gerrymandering as “detrimental to our democracy and weakens the individual voices that form our electorates.”

She ran as a moderate, but Spanberger immediately turned sharply left once in office and called for the most extreme gerrymander in the nation.

The court found that effort was not only unconstitutional, but “wholly unprecedented in Virginia’s history.”

It characterized the state’s position as “a story of the tail wagging the dog that has no tail.”

While some of us had previously expressed skepticism over the rushed effort to circumvent the state constitution, the media almost exclusively relied on liberal experts who predicted the new districts would be upheld.

It was a calculated risk for Democrats, who have now burned their bridges with Virginia conservative and Republican voters.

As Winston Churchill said, “Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.”

Exhilarating and unforgettable: In a purple state where politicians often require crossover votes to prevail, the redistricting push was not just partisan but personal for voters.

National Democrats will soon “find out” whether Jeffries was right to prematurely celebrate a victory that seemed to secure his anticipated elevation to Speaker of the House.

The party is facing a potentially catastrophic reversal of fortune.

When Democrats declared a gerrymandering war, some of us warned that the party, with its already heavily gerrymandered blue states, had far more to lose than the GOP did.

It was particularly comical when Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey pledged to join the redistricting fray, even though her state is so badly gerrymandered that it’s elected zero Republicans to the House since the 1990s.

Virginia, a state long opposed to gerrymandering, has been considered the fairest state in the country, with a distribution of congressional seats that closely matches its partisan divide.

Once Spanberger sought to eradicate Republican representation, total war broke out — and now red states like Florida and Tennessee have moved forward with their own redistricting.

On top of the fact that GOP states have more room for partisan gerrymandering, the Virginia Supreme Court decision comes on the heels of the US Supreme Court’s ban on racial gerrymandering.

That means a dozen or more Democratic districts could now be deemed unconstitutional — and Louisiana and Mississippi are moving to redistrict in line with the Supreme Court’s decision.

The result could be a dramatic shift in districts favoring the GOP.

To make matters worse for the Democratic Party, a new census in 2030 will correct the mistakes that erroneously awarded them multiple districts after the 2020 census.

Those corrections, and the ongoing exodus from high-tax blue states to booming red ones, could translate into even more congressional gains for the GOP.

That prospect of a political apocalypse has Democratic strategists pushing for radical changes in Washington before it’s too late.

Top priority: packing the Supreme Court as soon as they retake power.

As Virginia has shown, an independent court can unravel the best-laid plans.

Democratic politicians, pundits and professors have been openly pushing for expanding the high court to 13 members with four new liberal additions, in order to rubber-stamp the radical changes needed to keep the party in power.

James Carville recently told Democratic politicians that they have no choice but to pack the court, declaring “F–k it . . . Just do it.”

He suggested, however, that they might not want to tell the voters.

“Don’t run on it. Don’t talk about it,” he said. “Just do it.”

Last week, Jeffries declared the Supreme Court “illegitimate” as he blasted its ban on racial gerrymandering.

After the Virginia court’s ruling, the frustrated Democratic establishment is ever more likely to echo him — and to go beyond.

Many Democrats are now “all in” with this radical agenda.

With the courts declaring their redistricting efforts unconstitutional, it is the constitutional system itself that will now have to go.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

The Southern Poverty Law Center’s leader entered a not guilty plea in federal court this week, desperately fighting charges that the organization defrauded its donors by secretly funneling more than $3 million to the very white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups it claimed to oppose.

The SPLC was forced to respond to an 11-count indictment from the Trump DOJ, including six counts of wire fraud, four counts of bank fraud and false statements, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. 

Commentators are labelling the case one of the biggest scams ever to be exposed.

🚨 UPDATE: The Southern Poverty Law Center leader frantically pleads NOT GUILTY after they were exposed funding millions to white supremacists and neo-nazis

SHUT IT DOWN!

– 6 counts of wire fraud
– 4 counts of bank fraud and false statements
– 1 count of conspiracy to commit… pic.twitter.com/bfHORfLgTG

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 9, 2026

The SPLC is accused of making payments amounting to over $1 million to a National Alliance affiliate, more than $300,000 to an Aryan Nations affiliate, $270,000 to a “Unite the Right” member, $140,000 to a former National Alliance chairman, $73,000 to former KKK members, and $19,000 to an American Front president and felon.

The court appearance comes just weeks after the Trump DOJ’s indictment exposed the scheme. 

The DOJ alleges the SPLC used a now-defunct informant program as cover. Donors were never told their money was going to actual extremists through shell companies, sham accounts, and prepaid cards between 2014 and 2023. 

Instead of dismantling hate groups, the organization allegedly propped them up—manufacturing the very threats it used to justify its existence and fundraising.

SPLC interim president and CEO Bryan Fair issued a statement after the arraignment: “The charges against the SPLC are provably wrong; they are based on inaccurate facts and a misapplication of law. Our informant program was successful in accomplishing its purposes: Threats and attacks were prevented, criminal activity was stopped, and information was gathered to dismantle the efforts of hate and extremist groups.”

The statement continued, “There is no question that the information the SPLC shared with law enforcement saved lives. The SPLC will continue to fight white supremacy and various forms of injustice in our mission to build a democracy where we can all live and thrive. We will continue that mission no matter what.”20

Fair’s team also filed court documents claiming the indictment “seeks to criminalize some of the very investigative tools and programs that the SPLC has used for decades.”

Yet the numbers don’t lie. Over $3 million allegedly flowed directly to leaders and organizers of the racist groups the SPLC publicly condemned. Trial is set to begin in October.

This plea comes as no surprise to those who have watched the SPLC’s pattern. Long accused of inflating “hate group” lists to smear mainstream conservatives, the organization now stands accused in federal court of the very extremism it claims to fight. The Trump administration’s Justice Department has made clear it will not tolerate the scam.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche previously stated at the indictment announcement: “The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence. Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked. This Department of Justice will hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive playbook accountable. No entity is above the law.”

FBI Director Kash Patel added: “The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public. They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups—even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes. That is illegal—and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.”

GOP representative Andy Ogles has also declared the SPLC “absolutely culpable” in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, linking the group’s inflammatory labeling of conservatives to real-world violence:

The SPLC’s frantic not-guilty plea changes nothing. The evidence is in the indictment, the payment records, and now the courtroom itself. While the organization vows to fight on and continue its “mission,” Americans can see the truth: a so-called watchdog that funded the wolves it claimed to hunt.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

North Korea just casually revised its constitution to automatically launch a nuclear strike if leader Kim Jong Un is assassinated, or if the country’s nuclear command-and-control system is placed in danger by hostile forces’ attacks. 

The change was adopted during the first session of the 15th Supreme People’s Assembly in Pyongyang on March 22 and was disclosed this week by South Korea’s National Intelligence Service, which briefed senior officials on the details.

The updated Article 3 of North Korea’s nuclear policy law states: “If the command-and-control system over the state’s nuclear forces is placed in danger by hostile forces’ attacks … a nuclear strike shall be launched automatically and immediately.”

South Korean intelligence officials said the revision codifies procedures for retaliatory nuclear attacks in the event that Kim is killed or incapacitated during an attack, Reuters reports.

The policy update comes months after the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian officials in U.S.-backed Israeli strikes in February 2026. Analysts have described those operations as a “wake-up call” for Pyongyang, highlighting the effectiveness of leadership-targeted strikes.

Professor Andrei Lankov of Kookmin University in Seoul told The Telegraph that the constitutional emphasis gives added weight to what may have been existing policy: “This may have been policy before, but it has added emphasis now it has been enshrined in the constitution. Iran was the wake-up call.”

The nuclear policy revision was adopted alongside broader changes to North Korea’s constitution, also passed in March and revealed earlier this week. Those amendments remove all references to unification with South Korea, add an explicit territorial clause defining the country’s borders (including with the Republic of Korea to the south), and formally state that command authority over nuclear forces rests with Kim Jong Un as chairman of the State Affairs Commission.

North Korea has not issued an official response to the reports. South Korea’s government has said it remains committed to its policy of peaceful coexistence on the Korean Peninsula and will review the implications of the changes.

The moves come as North Korea continues to expand its nuclear and missile capabilities, including plans to deploy new long-range artillery systems near the border with South Korea.

Authored by J.B. Shurk via American Thinker,

Freedom exists in the absence of government control.  We are free when we are able to worship, speak, write, make a living, and protect our families and property without fear that government agents will punish us for our actions.  America’s Founding Fathers embraced an expansive view of personal liberty that recognizes the inherent right of each person to do as he sees fit, so long as that person refrains from infringing upon the liberties of another.

Right away, then, freedom comes with some restraint.  If we each lived alone on our own island, no-one’s liberty but our own would matter.  When we live within a society, our freedom comes with certain encumbrances – namely, an obligation not to poach the freedom of others.  There is, in other words, a moral consideration that necessarily accompanies the exercise of freedom.  Do my actions cause someone else harm?  Does the expression of my will unfairly restrict the expression of another?  Do my decisions unjustly deny someone else’s liberty?

Harm…fairness…justice – these are words essential to every person’s moral reasoning.  They are subjects that are dissected and analyzed throughout the Bible.  Because our common law has evolved from a Biblical worldview, our legal system is rooted in Judeo-Christian morality.  Therefore, an American who tries earnestly to be a good Christian is also likely acting within the boundaries of American law.  

Taken together, freedom, moral restraint, and legal punishment operate in concert within any society.  To the extent that a member of society can reasonably govern himself, State-implemented punishment becomes unnecessary.  When members of society abandon self-control and pursue personal liberty recklessly or in ways that threaten the liberty of others, State-implemented punishment steps in to provide legal constraints where moral restraint proved ineffective.

Thus, there is a natural relationship among personal freedom, moral conscience, and State force.  The more that people pursue their freedom in moral and just ways, the more irrelevant the State becomes.  A society whose people are individually capable of governing themselves has no need for the machinery of government.  The policing of a population’s legal obligations and the application of State-enforced punishments become not only redundant but also unjust infringements upon personal liberty.

It is no coincidence that free societies exist where there is a high degree of mutual trust among people.  If a shop owner trusts that customers will not steal, then businesses can thrive without a government police force monitoring private transactions.  If customers trust that manufacturers will refrain from making harmful products, then commerce can thrive without the need for government regulatory agencies.  If members of society recognize that the fruits of an individual’s labor belong to that person, then property rights are respected without the need for courts and lawsuits.  If public debate, dissent, and personal expression are highly valued, then there is no need for government agents to police words and ideas as “hate speech,” “harmful speech,” or “disinformation.”

High-trust societies are natural incubators of freedom.  Accordingly, fostering trust among members of society maximizes personal liberty.  How do societies cultivate trust?  In a word: culture.  

Culture is that collection of customs, mores, attitudes, traditions, beliefs, habits, language, and ways of life that bind a people together.  Culture is an unwritten code of conduct passed from one generation to the next.  Culture is the essential glue that allows common members of society to move in the same direction without any obvious director.  Societies with strong cultures do not need external police forces because members of society “police” themselves.  

When that culture includes a profound respect for personal freedom, private property, religious liberty, free expression, and self-defense, the mutual trust that exists among citizens naturally secures the blessings of liberty.  It is no accident that an American, Thomas Jefferson, wrote the Declaration of Independence two hundred and fifty years ago.  It is no accident that representatives from America’s original thirteen colonies devised together a Constitution that both greatly limits the powers of government and explicitly protects the inalienable rights of Americans.  It is no accident that Americans’ respect for private property transformed an unsettled continent into the wealthiest, most innovative, and most influential country in the world.  A moral people committed to personal freedom can build, do, and accomplish anything.  A moral people committed to self-government can remake the entire world.

It is not difficult to see why the New World’s values have always threatened the Old World’s grip on global power.  In a world where intelligence, hard work, and dedication matter more than titles of nobility and unearned inheritance, the common man is capable of generating wealth without a feudal lord’s permission.  In a world where free speech and freedom of assembly are cherished political virtues, the common man is capable of forming opinions without the help of so-called “elites.”  In a world where self-defense and private ownership of firearms go hand in glove with self-expression and private property, the common man is master of his castle and servant to none.  

Globalism’s “elites” have been pushing the idea of a “New World Order” for decades.  But it is important to remember that when Americans declared their independence from the British Empire, they established a “New World” order that has continued to the present day.  Two hundred and fifty years after the Declaration of Independence, the United States is the wealthiest, strongest, and most robust nation that has ever existed.  It has 4% of the world’s population but influences every part of the globe.  When Old Europe pushes for a “New World Order,” old aristocrats are desperate to return to the social conditions that existed prior to 1776.  Globalists want the “Old World Order” rebranded as something new.

Ask yourself how you might go about destroying America’s “New World” order, so that the Old World’s feudal system can return.  If you want to dismantle Americans’ economic and political freedoms, then you need to wreck Americans’ mutual trust.  If you want to turn Americans against each other, then you need to ruin the foundations of their shared culture.  In order to weaken the bonds of culture, you must first discourage self-restraint.  By discouraging self-restraint, you encourage demands for government control.  By empowering the State, you diminish the sphere of personal freedom.  When the people have been denied freedom for long enough, they forget what it means to be free.  Eventually, when the government offers “free” welfare in exchange for obedience, the descendants of free people accept their new chains.  They accept total government control.  They accept slavery.

Flooding Western countries with foreign immigrants has never been about compassion.  Globalists use mass migration to destroy any semblance of social trust.  “Multiculturalism” has nothing to do with fostering civic peace.  Globalists “divide and conquer” populations in order to more easily rule over the dismembered parts.  Anti-Christian programs do not exist to protect “diverse” points of view.  Globalists attack Christians because Christian virtue cultivates the moral restraint necessary for freedom to thrive.  

For globalists, freedom is the enemy.  Government control is their greatest friend.  You cannot destroy the former and promote the latter until the natural bonds of society are first broken.  Totalitarianism never arrives by decree.  It comes by request.  In the two hundred and fiftieth year of America’s “New World” order, remember this: Our freedom is always under attack.  Be vigilant and defend it.

Summary

• Trump calls Iran’s peace proposal response “totally unacceptable”

• Iran warns of ‘decisive, immediate’ response to British or French warships approaching Hormuz Strait.

• Iran responds Sunday to US peace proposal, finally submitting something official to Pakistan. Details not initially disclosed. Trump TS: Iran “playing games with the United States.”

• IRGC new warning: will unleash “heavy attack” on US bases in region if more Hormuz aggression persists.

*  *  *

Trump Says Iran Response “Totally Unacceptable”

President Trump has just issued a statement on his TruthSocial feed rejecting ‘unacceptable’ Iranian proposal for ending war.

“I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called “Representatives.”

I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!

Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

Iran offered to transfer some of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to a third country, but rejected the idea of dismantling its nuclear facilities, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Iran disputed the report, according to Iran’s semi-official news agency Tasnim.

And with the fragile ceasefire still holding for now, the odds of a peace deal by the end of May have plummeted.

Iran: We’ll Immediately Strike French & British if they Approach Strait

Iran has newly warned of “a decisive and immediate response” to any deployment of European military vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, and has further declared that the Islamic Republic alone controls security in the strategic waterway. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi issued the warning Sunday in a post on X after France and Britain announced plans to deploy warships to the region.

“Whether in times of war or peace, only the Islamic Republic of Iran can establish security in this strait and will not allow any country to interfere in such matters,” he said.

Gharibabadi said France plans to deploy its flagship aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, to the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, while Britain plans to send a warship to the area under the stated goal of protecting freedom of navigation. Already these Western allied assets are moving through the Suez Canal as of days ago.

“Any deployment and stationing of extra-regional destroyers around the Strait of Hormuz, under the pretext of protecting shipping, is nothing but an escalation of the crisis, the militarization of a vital waterway, and an attempt to cover up the true root of insecurity in the region,” he stated.

Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei says Tehran’s “restraint is over” and any aggression against Iranian vessels will be met with a heavy and decisive Iranian response against American vessels and bases.

🔴LIVE updates: https://t.co/4wl9kYw8g4 pic.twitter.com/QckEP0allp

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) May 10, 2026

But France and Britain have previously sought to clarify that their warships will remain largely in a background support role when compared to the US naval blockade in the Gulf of Oman region. Their ships would only directly join Persian Gulf operations only once the war ended, according to reports. 

Trump: Iran is Playing Games With the United States

New Sunday Truth Social statement soon on the heels of Tehran submitting its response to the US peace proposal, via Pakistan:

Trump said Iran had been “playing games with the United States, and the rest of the world, for 47 years,” adding that it had been “laughing at our new GREAT AGAIN country,” but stressed that “they will be laughing no longer!”

Iran Finally Responds To US

After days of waiting, Iran has submitted its response to the latest US peace proposal to mediator Pakistan, despite the recent flare-up in renewed exchanges of fire in the contested Strait of Hormuz this past week.

“Iran has submitted its response to the latest US proposal to end 10 weeks of war, the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency reported on Sunday, without providing any further details,” Bloomberg confirms in a fresh headline. “Tehran hasn’t yet given any public indication it would accept President Donald Trump’s plan that stipulates Iran permits passage through the Strait of Hormuz and Washington ends its blockade on Iranian ports in the next month.”

IRAN REPLY TO US PROPOSAL INCLUDES ENDING WAR ON ALL FRONTS: TV

This comes as Qatar’s PM has warned Iran that using the Strait of Hormuz as a pressure card, to choke the global economy, “would only lead to deepening the crisis” – and amid reports there could still be sporadic attacks on Gulf countries like the UAE. According to more of the limited details:

Sources in both camps have told Reuters the latest peace efforts are aimed at a temporary memorandum of understanding to halt the war and allow traffic through the Strait of Hormuz while they discuss a fuller deal, which would have to address intractable disputes such as Iran’s nuclear program.

The latest from Iran’s president:

President Trump told Fox News days ago, “They want to make a deal. We’ve had very good talks over the last 24 hours, and it’s very possible that we’ll make a deal.” He had said if this happens “it’ll be over quickly” and oil prices will plummet.

IRGC Fresh Warning on US Bases

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has warned any attack on Iranian oil tankers and commercial ships will be met with assaults on US bases and “enemy ships” in the region, Al Jazeera reports.

“Warning! Any aggression against the oil tankers and commercial vessels of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be met with a heavy attack on one of the American centers in the region and the enemy’s ships,” the IRGC Navy said in the statement.

“Iran will no longer allow passages that are harmful to its interests”

Brigadier General Akrami Nia, the spokesman of the Iranian army, says countries that comply with US sanctions against Iran will surely have problems crossing the Strait of Hormuz. pic.twitter.com/6EZ6NWsZse

— Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) May 10, 2026

Tehran is accusing the US side of severely violating the ceasefire earlier this week, by firing on and disabling two Iranian-flagged tankers trying to reach Iranian ports. State media reviewed of these hostile incidents:

In a statement, the spokesman for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said the “aggressive, terrorist and marauding US military” had targeted an Iranian oil tanker sailing from Iran’s coastal waters near Jask toward the Strait of Hormuz, as well as another vessel entering the strategic waterway near the UAE port of Fujairah.

The spokesman also said civilian areas along the coasts of Bandar Khamir, Sirik and Qeshm Island came under aerial attacks carried out “with the cooperation of some regional countries.”

The IRGC further said it will respond “powerfully and without the slightest hesitation” to any aggression or attack. Indeed there are reports that during the past week’s skirmishes Iran fired on three US warships seeking to exit waters of Iran’s coast.

Ayatollah Meets With Military Commander

We reported earlier that in an official update Iran said that Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei had been ‘moderately injured’ but is recovering, and he had met with the president of the Islamic Republic. On Sunday he also met with a top military commader, per state Mehr, which writes: “In a meeting with Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, Commander of Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters Major General Ali Abdollahi presented a comprehensive report on the preparedness of the powerful Armed Forces of the country to confront enemies’ strategic mistake.”

According to more of the state readout:

Abdollahi said “all fighters of Islam” possess high readiness in terms of morale, defensive and offensive preparedness, strategic plans, and the equipment and weaponry required to confront hostile actions by the “American-Zionist enemies.”

He warned that if the enemies commit any “strategic mistake, aggression, or invasion,” Iranian forces would respond “swiftly, intensely, and powerfully.”

The commander also assured the Leader that the armed forces would, “with full obedience” to his orders, defend “the ideals of the Islamic Revolution, our beloved land Iran, sovereignty, national interests, and the brave Iranian nation until the last breath and to the death.”

During the meeting, Ayatollah Khamenei praised the country’s armed forces and issued new directives for continuing action and confronting enemies decisively following the 40-day US-Israeli war against the country.

The Wall Street Journal wrote Saturday of the Ayatollah, “A government official claimed Khamenei, who hasn’t been seen in public since that attack, is now in good health.” However, there’s still a lot of speculation on his role in national decision-making, and over whether he will ever make a public appearance.

The benchmark for global food commodity prices rose for a third consecutive month in April, hitting its highest level since early 2023, as Middle East supply disruptions, elevated energy costs, and tightening supplies of certain agricultural products appear to be driving the next leg higher in global food prices.

This is a major risk we have warned about throughout the U.S.-Iran war, as energy and supply chain disruptions spread quickly through fertilizer, diesel, freight, biofuels, grains, and vegetable oils. We even treated readers to a special food debate late last week to examine how the conflict could produce a broader food-inflation shock later this year.

The United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization’s FAO Food Price Index, which tracks monthly changes in the international prices of a basket of globally traded food commodities, averaged 130.7 in April, up 1.6% from its revised March level and 2% higher than a year ago. This places the global food index at its highest level since February 2023.

The largest move in the food index came from vegetable oils, where prices jumped 5.9% to the highest level since July 2022. Palm, soy, rapeseed, and sunflower oils all rose, supported by stronger biofuel demand, higher crude prices, and tight Black Sea supplies.

“Despite the disruptions linked to the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz, global agrifood systems continue to show resilience. Cereal prices have increased only moderately so far, supported by relatively strong stocks and adequate supplies from previous seasons. Vegetable oils, however, are experiencing stronger price increases, driven largely by higher oil prices, which are increasing demand for biofuels and putting additional pressure on vegetable oil markets,” said FAO Chief Economist Máximo Torero.

Here is how the other subcomponents performed last month:

The FAO Cereal Price Index rose by 0.8 percent from March and was up 0.4 percent from a year ago, reflecting higher prices across major cereals, except sorghum and barley. World wheat prices increased by 0.8 percent, due to concerns over drought in parts of the United States of America and a higher likelihood of below-average rainfall in Australia. The increase was further reinforced by expectations of reduced wheat plantings in 2026, with farmers shifting to less fertilizer‑intensive crops amid high fertilizer prices – driven by elevated energy costs and disruptions associated with the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Global maize prices increased by 0.7 percent, underpinned by seasonally tighter supplies and weather-related concerns in Brazil, as well as dry conditions affecting sowing in parts of the United States of America. Additional upward pressure came from firm ethanol demand amid elevated crude oil prices and ongoing concerns over fertilizer affordability. By contrast, world sorghum prices dropped by 4.0 percent, largely due to weaker global import demand and improved supply prospects in key producing and exporting countries.

The FAO All Rice Price Index rose by 1.9 percent in April, driven by higher Indica and fragrant rice prices, reflecting increased production and marketing costs in most rice-exporting countries following the surge in the prices of crude oil and its derivatives.

The FAO Vegetable Oil Price Index increased by 5.9 percent from March, reaching its highest level since July 2022. The rise was driven by higher prices of palm, soy, sunflower and rapeseed oils. International palm oil prices rose for the fifth consecutive month in April, largely underpinned by prospective stronger demand from the biofuel sector, supported by policy incentives in several producing countries and higher crude oil prices. Additional upward pressure stemmed from concerns over lower production in Southeast Asia in the coming months.

The FAO Meat Price Index reached a new record high in April, rising by 1.2 percent from March and 6.4 percent from a year ago. World bovine meat prices climbed to a new peak, underpinned by higher export quotations in Brazil amid limited supplies of slaughter-ready cattle, reflecting ongoing herd rebuilding.  Pig meat prices also rose, driven by firmer quotations in the European Union amid rising seasonal demand, though partly offset by lower prices in Brazil due to ample supplies.

By contrast, the FAO Dairy Price Index declined by 1.1 percent from March, mainly reflecting lower international quotations for butter and cheese amid abundant milk supplies in the European Union and stronger-than-expected late-season output in Oceania.

The FAO Sugar Price Index also dropped, down 4.7 percent from March and as much as 21.2 percent from a year ago. The decrease was largely driven by expectations of ample global supplies in the current season, reinforced by improved prospects in key Asian producing countries, notably China and Thailand. The start of the new harvest in Brazil, the world’s largest sugar producer, further contributed to the downward pressure on sugar prices.

The question now is whether the latest rise in global food prices marks the early stage of a much larger move higher, as surging diesel and fertilizer costs begin to filter through the agricultural complex.

How Bad Will It Get? Watch the food debate here.

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

💰 Earnings Estimate Revisions Are Very Optimistic

Last week, we discussed the S&P earnings record and why such record earnings could be a warning for the market. I want to continue that discussion by focusing not only on what has happened but also on what is expected to happen in the future. While the Q1 2026 earnings results are spectacular, so far, the earnings estimate revisions behind them are the real story.

The first-quarter 2026 earnings season is delivering results that Wall Street rarely sees. With roughly two-thirds of the S&P 500 having reported, the blended growth rate has climbed to 27.1% year-over-year, more than double the 13.2% that consensus modeled at the end of the quarter on March 31. If that figure holds, it will be the strongest year-over-year print since the post-COVID rebound quarter of Q4 2021. 84% of companies have beaten EPS, 81% have beaten revenue, and the average earnings surprise sits at 20.7%, nearly three times the 5-year average of 7.3%.

That’s the surface story. The more interesting question, and the one investors should be asking, is why analysts were so wrong heading in, and what it means that they’re now revising earnings estimates higher with a velocity that has almost no historical parallel.

Look at Morgan Stanley’s chart of consensus 2026 earnings estimate revisions versus history. In any normal year, by the time Q1 earnings season rolls around, analysts have been quietly walking earnings estimates down for six months. The historical median revision pattern drifts from 1.00 in January to roughly 0.92 by year-end. Two years of cuts. That’s the analyst playbook. Start the year too optimistic, get reset by reality, and end the year right.

This year is doing the opposite. The 2026 earnings estimate index cratered to 0.96 last summer during the Iran shock, then turned vertical. By May, it’s broken above 1.06. We’re looking at a roughly 14-point swing in earnings estimates relative to the historical pattern. That is what Morgan Stanley calls “fairly unprecedented,” and that’s analyst-speak for something they don’t have a clean comparison for.

The Mag 7 alone moved from a 22.4% expected growth rate at the end of March to a 61% blended print today. Four of the top five contributors to S&P 500 earnings growth this quarter are Alphabet, NVIDIA, Amazon, and Meta. The same four names driving index returns are now driving the earnings estimate revisions. That’s not a coincidence, and there is more to this story as noted by Sage Road Research:

“The AI distortion goes beyond stock prices to profits. Total S&P 500 earnings are on track to rocket 27% higher in the first quarter, FactSet estimates. But profits for the Mag-7 alone will be up 61%; for the other 493, just 16%, a figure itself inflated by semiconductor companies like Micron. This is skewing the division of the economic pie between capital and labor. As profits gallop ahead, labor compensation (wages and benefits) grew just 3.1% annualized in the first quarter, and actually shrank 0.5% after inflation, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Labor’s share of total business-sector output fell to 54.1%, the lowest since records began in 1947.” – @TrevorNoren

So, if it isn’t consumers’ and subsequently economic growth, driving earnings estimate revisions, then what is?

What’s Actually Driving the Upside

Three things are happening at once, and we have to separate them.

First, the AI capex cycle is finally showing up in the income statement. Hyperscalers have spent the better part of two years building out compute. The revenue is now landing. Communication Services is reporting +53% earnings growth, Tech is at +50%, and Consumer Discretionary is at +39%. Those aren’t soft beats. They’re the result of capex that was already locked in before the quarter started.

Second, margins are at a record. The blended Q1 net profit margin came in at 14.7%, the highest reading in over 15 years. That’s the real engine behind the surprise factor. Revenues grew 11.1%, which is solid but not extraordinary. The gap between 11% revenue growth and 27% earnings growth is operating leverage. A company that cut 8% of its workforce in 2023 and held headcount flat through 2025 is now monetizing every dollar of incremental revenue at a much higher incremental margin.

Third, breadth in Q1 results is finally improving. The Deutsche Bank charts make this point clearly. Earnings growth for the median S&P 500 company is now in the double digits, the highest reading in four years. All eleven sectors are tracking positive growth for the first time since 2022. Margins for “the rest” of the index, the 493 names outside the Mag 7, are turning higher after a steady three-year decline. Operating cash flow for non-financial corporates is running near 20% year-over-year. Q1 results are genuinely broader than they have been in years, and that deserves credit. But there’s an important asterisk on this point that I’ll address in the next section.

The Asterisk on “Broadening”

Now we have to separate two things that get confused in the headlines. Q1 reported earnings broadened, but the forward-year earnings estimate revisions did not. Those are different statements about different time horizons, and the difference matters.

Goldman Sachs published a chart in early May that quantifies the gap. The bank tracks a basket of AI infrastructure stocks (S&P 500 constituents in their AI Semiconductors, AI Data Centers, and Power Up America baskets) and compares it to the broader index on cumulative 2026 EPS revisions since December 2024. The numbers are striking.

AI infrastructure stocks have seen 2026 earnings estimates revised higher by 55% since December 2024. The full S&P 500 is up 7%. The S&P 500 ex-AI infrastructure is down 1%. Read that last figure twice. Strip out chip designers, hyperscaler infrastructure, AI data centers, and the power and grid names that feed them, and the remaining 470-odd companies in the index have collectively had their 2026 earnings estimates revised lower over the past 17 months. Not flat. Lower.

This is the cleanest picture of concentration risk you’ll see this cycle. The narrow-market critique, which has been valid for 2 years, isn’t going away, even after Q1 results came in. It’s hiding inside the index math. Mega-cap AI names have absolute earnings dollars so dominant that even modest forward growth in their numbers swamps the rest of the 500. When analysts publish their 2026 earnings estimate consensus forecast for the index, they’re effectively publishing a forecast for roughly 30 companies. The other 470 are a rounding error to the headline.

“Strip AI infrastructure out of the index, and 2026 estimates are actually lower than they were 17 months ago.”

The implication for portfolio construction is direct. If you own a market-cap-weighted S&P 500 index fund, you don’t own the diversified earnings stream the marketing material implies. You own a concentrated AI infrastructure bet wrapped in a passive vehicle. The two largest holdings in the SPY are Nvidia and Microsoft. Apple, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, and Broadcom round out the top eight. Seven of the top eight names are direct AI infrastructure plays. That’s not diversification. That’s a thematic fund with 490 other names attached for legal reasons.

None of this is bearish on AI itself. The capex cycle is real, the earnings growth is landing, and the demand picture remains durable. The point is more subtle. The index’s strength masks the weakness of its components. If AI infrastructure names hit a single quarter of disappointment, whether from capex digestion, an export control surprise, or simple revenue deceleration, there’s no second engine in the index to absorb the impact. Equal-weighted measures of breadth being healthy on Q1 results don’t fix the forward-revision concentration problem. They are two different problems.

Here is What Nobody Wants to Talk About

Here’s where I have to put the brakes on. When earnings estimates are revised this hard, this fast, you have to ask whether the market is pricing the beat or the trend. Because historically, vertical earnings estimate revisions are a late-cycle phenomenon, not an early one.

Notice the long-term S&P 500 earnings growth estimate chart. The current reading sits near 19%, the highest print since 2000. The chart’s prior peaks tell a story. The “New Economy” peak in 2000. The “Tax Cuts” peak in 2018. The “COVID” rebound peak in 2021. Every one of those readings was followed by a meaningful drawdown in equities and a sharp downward revision cycle in earnings within twelve to twenty-four months. Forecasts above the long-term trend channel have a poor history.

“When everybody is revising higher, the marginal trade is no longer to buy the beats. It’s to fade the next miss.”

The other tell is the divergence between hard data and earnings. ISM Manufacturing is sitting in the low 50s, barely above the contraction line. The S&P 500 is up roughly 19% year over year. That gap historically closes one of two ways. Either ISM rallies into the high 50s as the cycle accelerates, or earnings get marked down to meet the macro. The latter has happened more often than the former at this point in a cycle.

This Summer is Where Headwinds Rise

There’s a calendar problem stacking up behind these numbers. The Q1 print benefited from easy year-over-year comparisons. Q2 won’t have that tailwind. By the time July prints arrive, the comparison base resets to 2025’s stronger second-quarter results, which means the same level of underlying earnings translates into a much smaller growth rate. That mechanical effect alone could pull the headline growth rate from 27% back into the low double digits, even if absolute earnings keep climbing. Markets don’t always distinguish between “growth slowing” and “earnings missing.” They tend to react to the headline number first and sort it out later.

Then there’s the bond market setup. The 10-year is still trading near 4.4%, the front end is pricing barely two cuts for the rest of the year, and core inflation has been sticky in the high 2s for six months. If the AI capex cycle keeps running hot, that’s incremental demand for chips, electricity, and skilled labor, all of which feed into the inputs the Fed watches. The risk isn’t a recession scare. It’s a “no cuts, maybe a hike” repricing that historically chops 5% to 8% off equity valuations in short order.

Positioning is the other variable. Sentiment surveys are stretched. Equity allocations among retail and institutional investors are at multi-year highs. CTAs are max long. When everyone is on the same side of a trade, and the data starts to disappoint, price discovery is brutal because there are no marginal buyers left to absorb the unwind.

Institutions Are On Risk Watch

The most useful way to gauge the risk landscape is to look at what institutional trading desks are actually doing, not just what they’re saying. The substance of the conversations across the buy-side and the dealer community is converging on a single posture: stay long, but explicitly hedge. The same desks publishing constructive twelve-month equity targets are simultaneously paying for downside protection in size. That’s the tell.

Five points are worth laying out.

• First, positioning. The Nasdaq 100 just delivered its biggest monthly gain in over 23 years. A move of that magnitude has consequences for who is left to buy. Systematic strategies (CTAs, vol-target funds, risk parity) have completed their re-risking. The buy-the-dip retail bid has been engaged since the March lows. Discretionary trading desks are now running long exposure at around +6 on a -10 to +10 scale, up from -4 at the March lows. The marginal buyer in this tape has already shown up. From here, the question is who steps in if the data disappoints.

• Second, the fundamental catalyst stack is largely behind us. The fiscal pulse that supported corporate margins is fading. The Q1 EPS print of 27% will not repeat against tougher comparisons. The operating leverage that drove the surprise factor cannot keep expanding indefinitely. The combination means the next four quarters of earnings reports face a higher bar with less wind at their backs.

• Third, the Strait of Hormuz is still live. The tape has effectively forgotten last summer’s oil shock. That’s how markets work. We discount tail risk after the immediate catalyst passes, but the underlying geopolitical setup has not materially improved. A single headline can reprice oil 4% in a session, and equities are positioned for a benign energy backdrop that may not hold.

• Fourth, the Fed is constrained. Last week’s hawkish hold told us where the committee sits when core inflation prints closer to 3% than 2%. The base case for cuts in September and December assumes labor market softening that has not yet arrived. If those cuts get pushed, the equity multiple has to absorb the disappointment, and historically that costs the index 5% to 8% in short order.

• Fifth, narrow breadth is a real risk that history takes seriously. Most standard measures of S&P breadth are exceptionally thin right now. Nine of eleven sectors are positive on the year, which sounds healthy on the surface, but participation under the index headline is concentrated in a handful of mega-cap names. The strongest historical conclusion isn’t that narrow breadth is bearish (because, for two years, it hasn’t been), but that it raises the probability of a momentum rollover when the rotation eventually breaks. You don’t pick that fight. You do prepare for it.

Here’s the practical math that ties this back to portfolio action. One-month at-the-money puts on the S&P 500 are currently priced at less than 2% of the spot price. For investors carrying meaningful long exposure into a summer with the stack of risks described above, that’s compelling risk transfer. The same institutional desks publishing constructive twelve-month equity views are paying for that protection right now. They call it “the cost of a good night’s sleep.” That phrase belongs in every portfolio review this quarter.

🔑 Key Catalysts Next Week

After two weeks of Magnificent 7 earnings and payrolls data, the calendar pivots back to the macro gauntlet that will define the Fed’s June path. Tuesday’s April CPI, Wednesday’s April PPI, and Thursday’s April Retail Sales create a three-day inflation-consumer trifecta that will either confirm or break the “higher for longer” trade heading into the June 16 FOMC meeting. This week isn’t about individual stocks; it’s about the price level and the consumer’s willingness to pay it.

Tuesday’s April CPI is the week’s anchor. March ran hot with the headline at +0.4% MoM and the core reading rising +0.3%. That reflected the first full month of the Iranian oil shock and the broadened tariff regime. April is the second month of that regime, and the question is whether the acceleration was a one-month spike or the beginning of a new trend. Energy prices eased modestly in late April as Iran ceasefire talks gained traction, potentially providing a one-month offset. But core goods, where tariff passthrough lives, won’t have that benefit. Used car prices, which had been masking tariff pressure in prior months, are no longer declining. Shelter costs remain stubbornly elevated. If the headline comes in above +0.3% MoM or core reaccelerates, summer rate-cut expectations are dead.

Wednesday’s PPI doubles down. Producer prices feed directly into the PCE calculation that the Fed actually targets. March PPI printed a blistering +0.7%, the hottest monthly reading in over a year. April PPI tells us whether the upstream pipeline is still pressurized or whether oil’s modest pullback and easing supply chains provided relief. A PPI-to-CPI passthrough story is forming: if producers are absorbing cost increases now, margins will compress, and earnings will be revised down. If they’re passing them through, consumer inflation stays elevated, and the Fed stays on hold. Either outcome is negative for someone.

On the earnings side, this is the bridge week between Big Tech and the Nvidia event on May 20th. Cisco, on Wednesday after the close, is the enterprise IT capex bellwether. AI-driven switching demand, progress on Splunk integration, and the order backlog will tell us whether corporate technology spending is holding up or pulling back amid macro uncertainty. Alibaba Wednesday morning is the China read on cloud and AI revenue from the Qwen model, quick commerce investment, and tariff/trade war impact on cross-border commerce. Applied Materials on Thursday after the close is the semiconductor capital equipment signal ahead of Nvidia, its $5 billion EPIC platform bet, and wafer fab equipment orders are the leading indicator for chip manufacturing capacity expansion.

CPI will tell us where inflation is, while PPI tells us where it’s going. Retail Sales on Thursday will tell us whether the consumer breaks before the Fed blinks. Three data points, three days, one narrative. If all three run hot, the “higher for longer” trade hardens into “higher for the foreseeable future,” and risk assets may begin to reprice. This is why we continue to suggest maintaining portfolio management practices carefully.

What Should Investors Do Now

Q1 was a genuinely strong quarter. Margins are real. Cash flow is real. The broadening is real. None of that is in dispute. What’s worth disputing is the assumption baked into consensus. An 18.6% full-year forecast assumes the run rate from Q1 just delivered continues for three more quarters, with no margin compression, no demand weakness, and no AI capex digestion. That’s a stack of optimistic assumptions, and the historical record on stacks like that is unkind.

For investors, the playbook into summer is unchanged in direction but tighter in execution. Trim into strength rather than chase. Reduce concentration in the names that have done the most work, especially where position sizes have crept up from price appreciation rather than active accumulation. Add hedges, not insurance you’ll never use, but actual collars or put spreads on the largest exposures. Keep dry powder for the first material disappointment, because it always comes, and the names worth owning rarely go on sale during euphoria.

The setup that worries me isn’t that earnings are bad. It’s that they’re so good the bar has been raised to a level that historically marks a peak, not a launching pad. When everybody is revising higher, the marginal trade is no longer to buy the beats. It’s to fade the next miss. That moment usually arrives without warning, and the pattern has held in every prior cycle that produced a chart like the one in front of us today.

Stay long, but stay hedged. The asymmetry has shifted.