71.2 F
Chicago
Monday, September 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 1016

The Parents of Charlie Kirk’s Prodigal Assassin

0
The Parents of Charlie Kirk’s Prodigal Assassin

Authored by David DesRosiers, President, RealClearFoundation,

Charlie Kirk’s murderer came from somewhere. We all do.

Since the “In the beginning …” times, our species has wrestled with the fundamental logic – and perceived unfairness – of holding parents responsible for the sins of their children. Or the other way around. In the Old Testament book of Ezekiel, the prophet makes this explicit:

The person who sins will die. A son will not suffer the punishment for the father’s guilt, nor will a father suffer the punishment for the son’s guilt; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

Yet we mortals struggle with this idea. It’s a matter of self-preservation. The unifying idea is that we must bear some responsibility for the behavior of our own kids. Our kids are reflections of us because we put our stamp on them. Functional societies have a justifiable fear of the ripple effects of other people’s bad parenting.

Healthy families are civilization’s frontline schoolhouse of needed humans – producers of good men and women, and citizens. Bad parents can easily replicate themselves, and often do. It is a rare and beautiful testament to the enduring nature of the good to see exceptions to the rule.

The inverse happens, too. I have met a many a good parent of a bad kid – a bad seed who grows up to be a bad adult. Or a good kid who leaves the home for school, falls in with the wrong crowd, and rejects root and branch the ways of his family.

Modern parents know at some point we must give our offspring over to a hard and secular world outside the home threshold, a world that undermines good parenting at every turn. A school system that inverts the established, time-tested ways for purposes of political indoctrination. A culture that has lost any sense of moral and natural limits. An algorithmic media that is set on setting people into warring tribes with desensitized, brutish ways.

Charlie Kirk’s assassin was born and raised in southwestern Utah. Mormon territory. He was the son of a mother and father who raised kids in the Mormon way, which creates exemplary fruits that are missionaries to the world. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints – its formal name – instills family loyalty, stewardship, tolerance, sobriety, hard work, and sharing. They tithe. They contribute. They are impressive people.

Even Matt Stone and Trey Parker, with their “Dumb the Dumb, Dumb” view of the Mormon religion (which is a cutout for all organized religion), recognized that Mormons have strong families and raise very good kids. The whole “Book of Mormon” craze began with a 2003 “South Park” episode featuring an impressive Mormon high school kid. His ending soliloquy put it best:

“Look, maybe us Mormons do believe in crazy stories that make absolutely no sense, and maybe Joseph Smith did make it all up, but I have a great life, and a great family, and I have the Book of Mormon to thank for that,” he says. “The truth is, I don’t care if Joseph Smith made it all up, because what the church teaches now is loving your family, being nice and helping people.” 

I don’t know about you, but I admire the old-school way the accused killer’s father brought his son – his own flesh and blood – to face justice.

The family saw the fruit of their loins on video surveillance in a national all-points bulletin. The family reached out to their own. Father and grandfather. They talked him into coming home. Once he was home, they convinced him to turn himself in for the crime – and to stanch the dishonor that he had done to his family’s name.

Would Luigi Mangione’s wealthy and well-connected Maryland family have done the same if they recognized his distinctive eyebrows? “Come home, son,” followed by, “You must turn yourself in to the authorities and be held accountable.” There’s no evidence they did anything of the kind. If they had, would Luigi have complied? I doubt it.

Fathers and mothers of America: Do you think you and yours could do similarly? To ask that question is not to easily answer it.

This Utah family has a quiet dignity to it. Their creed was not an assassin’s creed. Their kid is certainly a lost young man. He took a path outside of his family’s way, but his family retained a line of communication and influence over their prodigal son. They lost their son to dark, demonic forces, but appealed to the light remaining in him, and brought him home and to justice.

What this family confronted deserves to be noticed, praised, and modeled. Our country was given clarity in real time. We very rarely get that. This young man did not come in lawyered up and with his phone locked and encrypted.

A reeling nation did not have to suffer the indignity of mushroom management, where “We the People” are kept in the legalese dark and fed legalese doggerel.

Every family that has successfully raised a good kid to adulthood knows how hard it is in our present educational, cultural, and social media bathhouses.

A family can hold a line, and a kid can transgress it. Once upon a time the family had educational and cultural support systems that checked transgression and bolstered parents and kids. Kids heard a shared common and civilized creed in and outside the house. That cord has been cut for a while, and our families and nation are suffering at scale because of it.

This family summoned their prodigal son home. While we rightfully think of their son as moral monster, they still had familial claim and power over him. And with it, they brought him home and then to justice.

This family gave another grieving family and a nation the closure it needed. We owe them our thanks and compassion for displaying moral courage when it counted. The sins of their son are not theirs. They ought to be seen by the nation as neighbors in good standing. They need and deserve our parental prayers.

Under present grooming circumstances, there but for the grace of God go all of us.

David DesRosiers is the publisher of RealClearMedia and president of the RealClear Media Fund, which supports the cause of free speech through its annual Samizdat Prize, and its reporting, and the viewpoint diversity method.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 23:40

South Carolina Judge’s Beachfront Home Burns Down, Hospitalizing Three People

0
South Carolina Judge’s Beachfront Home Burns Down, Hospitalizing Three People

A fire destroyed the Edisto Beach home of South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Diana Goodstein and her husband, former state Sen. Arnold Goodstein, on Saturday, sending three people to the hospital, according to the NY Post.

The blaze broke out around midday, forcing Arnold Goodstein to leap from the first floor to escape. He and two others were later rescued from a marshy area behind the house by neighbors and paramedics, who reached them in kayaks, according to the St. Paul’s Fire District.

One person was airlifted to the Medical University of South Carolina, while two others were transported by ground, officials said. Sources told FitsNews that Arnold was air-evacuated after breaking multiple bones in his hips, legs, and feet.

The Post writes that Goodstein, 69, was walking her dogs on the beach when the fire consumed the three-story waterfront home in the Jeremy Cay gated community, a neighbor told the Post and Courier.

“The condition of all three escapees wasn’t immediately known,” said Colleton County Fire Rescue Capt. KC Campbell.

Diana Goodstein has served as a judge since 1998. Her husband, a former Democrat representing Charleston County, served in the South Carolina House and Senate in the 1970s and later ran a homebuilding company that went bankrupt in 2008. The couple has two children.

State Law Enforcement Division is investigating the cause of the fire.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 23:15

Ukrainian Intelligence Says China Helping Russia Target Western-Funded Facilities In Ukraine

0
Ukrainian Intelligence Says China Helping Russia Target Western-Funded Facilities In Ukraine

Ukrainian Foreign Intelligence Agency official Oleh Alexandrov has told the state news agency Ukrinform that China has been directly assisting Russia with intelligence for use on the battlefield in Ukraine.

Specifically he said China is providing foreign intelligence to target those sites in Ukraine which benefit from foreign investment, meaning Western-backed and funded facilities, likely such as weapons production sites.

Adobe stock image

“There is evidence of a high level of cooperation between Russia and China in conducting satellite reconnaissance of the territory of Ukraine in order to identify and further explore strategic objects for targeting,” said Alexandrov. “As we have seen in recent months, these sites may belong to foreign investors.”

The Kremlin on Monday responded by rejecting the allegation, saying that it possesses all capabilities to not have to rely on any outside country or ally.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov when specifically asked about the new allegation from Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Agency said as follows:

“We have our own capabilities, including space capabilities, to accomplish all the tasks the special military operation poses,” he told reporters.

But the last year of the war has seen Moscow deepen its cooperation both with the Chinese and North Korean militaries.

The presence of North Korean troops within Russian forces is well-known, but Kiev has more recently alleged Chinese troops are fighting alongside Moscow forces as well.

There’s also reported to be training programs between Russian and Chinese militaries. For example, Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence Directorate has told local media, the Kyiv Post, that “The Kremlin has decided to allow Chinese military personnel to study and adopt the combat experience Russia has gained in its war against Ukraine.”

Also, Iran has factored into the equation given it has established a drone production facility within southern Russia.

Beijing has additionally in the past issued statements calling out NATO for its constant expansion, and activity which has even been lately introduced in the Pacific region, and growing ties to Japan.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 22:50

Back To Square One? Hamas, Israelis Meet In Egypt To Hash Out Trump Peace Plan

0
Back To Square One? Hamas, Israelis Meet In Egypt To Hash Out Trump Peace Plan

After President Trump issued weekend threats telling Hamas to move quickly on implementing his 20-point Gaza peace plan, along with previously warning there’d be “hell to pay” if they don’t free all 48 remaining hostages (living and deceased), it seems the sides are merely back to square one in a sense as delegations have been sent to Egypt.

A delegation of Hamas officials led by the terror group’s leader Khalil al-Hayya arrived in Egypt on Sunday night to begin negotiations on Washington’s plan to end the war in the Gaza Strip and free all 48 remaining hostages — at least 20 of them alive — as US President Donald Trump implored all parties to move fast toward an agreement,” Israeli media writes. An American official has told Sky News Arabia that still “There are many details that need to be worked on regarding the Gaza negotiations.” But the message from Washington is that the priority is the immediate release of the hostages.

EPA via Shutterstock

Negotiations over exactly how swaps will go down, and other conditions related to the future of Gaza – especially the disarming of Hamas and IDF partial withdrawal – are set for the Red Sea resort town of Sharm El-Sheikh. Trump had also previously cautioned that Hamas doesn’t have much room for negotiations at all.

And yet, the Israeli side may not yet be fully on board either, which could present significant obstacles to achieving a final peace. Times of Israel points out:

Israel’s delegation also departed for Sharm El-Sheikh on Sunday night, even as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was still attempting to keep his right-wing coalition allies on board with Trump’s ambitious 20-point plan and prevent them from jumping ship and bringing down his coalition. Still, opposition leader Yair Lapid has promised Netanyahu a “safety net” to prevent his government from falling in any Knesset vote as a consequence of the prime minister advancing the deal.

Disapproval within Netanyahu’s coalition is not the only obstacle to reaching an agreement: Hamas has said it is prepared to release the hostages it is holding, subject to certain conditions, but is expected to make additional demands, including as regards the Israeli military’s withdrawal from the Strip and the release of Palestinian security prisoners in exchange for the hostages.

Hamas has indeed added some ‘extra’ demands such as asking for the release of some top terror chiefs held in Israeli prisons, which Tel Aviv is likely to scoff at.

Israel is said to have halted its Gaza City offensive pending the peace deal, however, heavy bombardment from the air has reportedly continued, with Gaza’s Civil Defense most recently saying that 24 people have been killed in the last 24 hours.

And Middle East Eye reports, “Israel has killed more than 100 Palestinians since Hamas agreed on Friday to release all captives as part of the latest US ceasefire plan, with truce negotiations set to begin Monday in Egypt.”

“Heavy bombing rocked the Gaza Strip over the weekend, with strikes reported on residential neighborhoods, refugee camps, and aid distribution points,” it continues.

Even Egypt, which is playing host to the ‘final’ talks, is adding to the pressure, with Egypt’s President el-Sisi declaring Monday that “real peace in the Middle East will not be achieved unless an independent Palestinian state is created based on the principles of international legitimacy that restore rights to their rightful owners.”

“Take the win,” Trump urged…

But those who will be meeting in Sharm El-Sheikh will not be focused on such big picture things as a two-state solution, but instead on restoring a post-Hamas order to the Gaza Strip. Israel is certainly not going to sign on to a full-fledged Palestinian state.

Sisi added that a “ceasefire, the exchange of captives and Palestinian prisoners, redevelopment of Gaza, and the initiation of a peaceful political pathway towards the creation and recognition of a Palestinian state represent the correct track towards lasting peace and stability.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 22:25

Sen. Kennedy Just Exposed More Absurd Things Democrats Shut Down The Government For

0
Sen. Kennedy Just Exposed More Absurd Things Democrats Shut Down The Government For

Authored by Matt Margolis via PJMedia.com,

The Schumer Shutdown dragged through the weekend, with neither side budging. Republicans pushed for a straightforward continuing resolution to keep the government funded through November, but Democrats chose to hold the line for their wish list of radical spending priorities—billions and billions of dollars’ worth—and in doing so, shut the government down. The media has focused on their demand for free health care for illegal immigrants, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg. There’s a lot more buried in this standoff that isn’t getting the attention it deserves.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) took to the Senate floor this week and laid out, in his trademark blunt and hilarious fashion, exactly what Democrats are trying to shut the government down over—and it’s every bit as ridiculous as you’d expect.

“Basically, President Trump just said, ‘We want you to take some stuff out of the budget that we think is wasteful,’” Kennedy began. “And we did — and that upset the congresswoman.”

That “congresswoman,” of course, is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who, according to Kennedy, went ballistic when Trump and congressional Republicans started cutting some of the more absurd Biden-era spending priorities.

Kennedy didn’t hold back as he read aloud what Democrats are fighting to restore.

“We found that under President Biden, they were spending $3 million for circumcisions and vasectomies in Zambia,” he said. “We took that out. The congresswoman says, ‘We’re gonna shut down government until you put that back in.’”

And that was just the beginning.

“We found $500,000 of American taxpayer money for electric buses in Rwanda,” Kennedy continued.

“We found $3.6 million for pastry cooking classes and dance focus groups for male prostitutes in Haiti. I kid you not. I’m not making this up. It was in the budget under President Biden.”

Kennedy went on to rattle off even more examples of this insanity:

  • $6 million for media organizations for the Palestinians.

  • $833,000 for transgender people in Nepal.

  • $300,000 for a pride parade in Lesotho.

  • $882,000 for social media mentorship in Serbia.

  • $4.2 million for LGBTQI people in the Western Balkans and Uganda.

Do you think we should be funding that nonsense?

Republicans, Kennedy noted, stripped out each of these items as they tried to rein in wasteful foreign spending. But Democrats—with AOC and the “socialist wing” of the party leading the way—are threatening to shut the government down until every last one of those absurd expenditures is put back in.

“I could spend the rest of the afternoon here,” Kennedy said. “We took all that out. It upset Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez. It upset the socialist wing of her party. And now they’re threatening all other Democrats and saying, ‘You’ve got to shut that government down until we get what we want.’”

And that, Kennedy concluded, is what this entire budget fight is about—not defending American taxpayers or funding core government services, but holding the government hostage over millions in woke pet projects and bizarre international handouts.

The Schumer Shutdown didn’t happen by accident—it’s the result of Democrats choosing their woke agenda over citizens. Chuck Schumer made his priorities clear, and now the American people are paying the price.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 22:00

Is Silver About To Tumble Like in 1980 & 2011

0
Is Silver About To Tumble Like in 1980 & 2011

Submitted by Jesse Colombo of The Bubble Bubble Report

With silver rallying strongly and rising more than 50% since the start of the year, a growing number of investors are starting to worry that a crash may be coming, similar to what happened after the major spikes in 1980 and 2011, instead of focusing on the incredible long-term opportunity that remains in front of us.

But as one of the few analysts who correctly identified the bull market in both silver and gold from the very beginning, I have consistently urged investors to stop dwelling on negative scenarios and instead recognize the tremendous upside that still lies ahead. This is silver’s moment to shine, and it is also a moment of vindication for those of us who believed in it all along, even when it was ignored by the mainstream financial world and left for dead as recently as just a few months ago.

In this report, I’ll explain why I believe silver will not repeat the sharp collapses that followed its short-lived surges in 1980 and 2011. This time is different. This is a legitimate, sustainable bull market with real staying power and the potential for lasting gains.

To start, I want to show you the long-term chart of silver going back six decades to the 1960s. You’ll notice that there have been three major price surges. The first was the Hunt Brothers–driven spike in 1980, followed by the quantitative easing–fueled rally in 2011, and now the current precious metals bull market. I believe this current move is a legitimate and sustainable bull market that is here to stay, as I will explain throughout this piece.

Now I want you to notice that in both 1980 and 2011, silver surged toward the $50 an ounce level, but that is where those rallies failed and quickly reversed. As a result, the $50 level became a critical price ceiling and resistance level and it still is to this very day.

For the past two years, as I have been calling for a silver bull market, even when silver was still in the $20 range, I consistently pointed to the $50 level as the key one to watch. I believed it would act like a magnet and draw the price of silver toward it, since major psychological levels often have that effect. And sure enough, silver has steadily climbed toward that level, just as I expected.

Now, with silver trading around $47 to $48 at the time of writing, it is extremely close to breaking through the key $50 level, which is a major make or break point. I also want to point out that many investors bought significant amounts of both silver bullion and ETFs during the frenzy of 2011. Unfortunately, when the price plunged afterward, they were left holding the bag, and many have been sitting on losses for the past 14 years.

But once silver finally surpasses $50, which will mark a new all-time high, no silver investor will be sitting on a loss, at least in nominal terms. That fact alone makes the $50 level a critical psychological barrier that will trigger a surge in investor sentiment once silver breaks above it.

Until recently, many silver investors remained deeply discouraged by years of losses and underperformance. But a decisive break above $50 will mark the beginning of an entirely new era for silver and will set off a powerful virtuous cycle. Many more investors will pile in, including new and younger participants who never considered silver before and who are not burdened by the baggage carried by older, battle-scarred veterans. This explosion of interest will help drive silver to incredible new heights.

Now I want to say that I adamantly believe silver is going to surpass $50 and go much higher from there in the near future. However, there is something I want to point out. Because silver has surged so strongly and so quickly, it is a bit extended in the short term, which makes it likely that it will consolidate or pause before eventually breaking through $50. Evidence of this can be seen in the Relative Strength Index (RSI) momentum indicator, shown in the chart below, which provides overbought or oversold readings for assets. I respect what it indicates.

That being said, unlike many amateur investors and analysts, I am adamant that an overbought reading like the current one in silver is not an automatic signal to sell or an indication that the bull market is over. I recommend reading my tutorial on this topic to learn more. There is a very high likelihood that silver will experience a shallow pullback or move sideways for a time to work off its overbought condition. This would conserve energy for the next leg higher, when silver smashes through the $50 ceiling.

Also, refer to my piece from April, when I called on the very day that gold was likely to consolidate temporarily, but not crash. Sure enough, that is exactly what played out in the following months, setting gold up for the impressive rally it is experiencing today. I believe a similar scenario is likely to play out in silver. And honestly, I welcome that because I would rather see silver rise in an orderly, more sustainable way than risk burning itself out. Plus, I would like to accumulate more of everything, including silver bullion, mining stocks, and more! And I’m sure you do too.

Now I want to get to the part of this report where I explain why the current bull market in silver is very different from the ones that failed in 1980 and 2011. The first point I want to make is that while $50 is a key nominal and psychological price ceiling to watch, and I believe silver will break through it decisively, even if it pauses first to work off its overbought condition, it is important to consider how much inflation has occurred over the past several decades. In real terms, the price of silver remains much lower than those previous peaks. That means $50 in 1980 or 2011 is certainly not the same as $50 in 2025, as anyone who has recently been to the grocery store can easily understand.

To illustrate that point, I created a chart showing the real, or inflation-adjusted, price of silver over the past six decades. On the chart, I highlighted what the $50 silver peaks in 1980 and 2011 would be worth in 2025 dollars. It turns out that in 1980, silver reached the equivalent of $199, and in 2011, it reached the equivalent of $72!

Now compare that to today, with silver trading around $47, which is much lower than either of those past peaks. For that reason alone, not even including the additional points I will explain next, I believe the current silver bull market is sustainable, has much more room to run, and should be able to finally smash through the $50 ceiling that has held it back for so long.

To further reinforce my point above, I also want to show you the ratio of silver to the U.S. M2 money supply, indexed to 100. This may be an even more accurate measure of inflation than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) used to create the previous chart. After all, the root cause of inflation is growth in the money supply itself. As Milton Friedman, the Nobel Prize–winning economist, famously said, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.”

Similar to what the real silver price chart revealed, this chart shows that although silver is approaching the same nominal price of $50, its real-world price is much lower than it was in 1980 and 2011. For example, in 1980 the ratio was 1,038, in 2011 it was 176, and now it is just 66. I see this as clear evidence that, despite its recent gains, silver’s bull market is nowhere near being long in the tooth. It still has substantial room to rise, and it should be able to blow through the $50 level with ease.

On that note, I also recommend reading my recent report on how the U.S. and global money supply is growing at an alarming rate. I also suggest reading my other report that explains how it is not so much that gold is rising in value, but rather that paper currencies are losing value.

Next let’s move on to another metric that confirms that silver is still much cheaper today than it was at the peaks in 1980 and 2011, despite its recent gains. This time, we will look at the silver-to-gold ratio, which is a useful way to determine whether silver is undervalued or overvalued relative to gold, the leading benchmark in the precious metals market.

While gold has always been more expensive than silver throughout history, the gap between them has varied significantly. At the 1980 peak, silver was 6.7% of the price of gold. At the 2011 peak, it was 3.3%. But now, silver is just 1.2% of gold’s price, which is far below historical levels.

This indicates that silver is extremely cheap by historical standards and still has substantial room for its bull market to continue. And based on the duration of past precious metals bull markets, I believe silver still has at least another decade to run, and the same goes for gold (learn more).

Another eye-opening metric that confirms silver is still extremely cheap is the ratio of silver to the U.S. federal debt, which now stands at $37.8 trillion and is growing at an alarming pace of $1 trillion every 100 days with no signs of slowing. This is an important metric because it shows whether the price of silver has kept pace with the growth of the national debt, and the answer is clearly no.

The chart, indexed to 100, shows that this ratio was 1,377 at the 1980 peak, 87 at the 2011 peak, and only 33 today. This indicates that silver has substantial room to catch up to the expanding national debt. In that context, $50 silver is not expensive by any measure, and a move to $100 or more is far from inconceivable.

Another reason why this ratio is so important is that the higher the federal debt rises relative to GDP, the closer we move to the inevitable breaking point where the government and the Federal Reserve will be forced to support the U.S. Treasury market and fund government operations by running the printing presses on overdrive. This will send inflation through the roof and ultimately destroy the dollar, causing gold and silver to reach prices that are difficult to even comprehend.

This will not be ordinary inflation, but full-blown hyperinflation like what my great-grandparents suffered through in Weimar Germany during the 1920s. It devastated the wealth and economy of Germany and was the reason they emigrated to the United States. Unfortunately, it also led to mass radicalization, which directly paved the way for the rise of Hitler.

Unfortunately, this debt problem is truly a worldwide phenomenon, as global debt has surged more than tenfold since the mid-1990s, reaching an estimated $250 trillion. This towering debt burden is a ticking time bomb that will ultimately bring fiat currencies to their knees. That is why it is of the utmost importance for everyone to acquire at least some physical gold and silver to protect themselves against what lies ahead. This fact alone guarantees that precious metals still have much further to rise.

Another useful way to determine whether silver is cheap or expensive compared to its past is to measure it against another yardstick: the Dow Jones Industrial Average. This comparison is valuable because there is a long-established relationship between precious metals and stocks, with capital rotating back and forth between them in secular phases. In many ways, they act as counterbalances to each other.

The chart of the silver-to-Dow ratio, indexed to 100, shows that silver at its 1980 peak reached an astounding 3,939. At the 2011 peak, it was 282. Today, it is only 68. This confirms that silver remains very cheap, and that $50 is no longer a particularly high price.

The reason for this extremely low ratio is twofold: the U.S. stock market is highly inflated and expensive right now, while silver remains undervalued by nearly every metric. I believe this situation will reverse, with silver far outperforming as stocks decline and their lofty valuations return to more realistic levels. That reversal will benefit precious metals enormously, as trillions of dollars flow out of a sinking stock market and into a booming silver and gold market, sending them dramatically higher.

As we wrap up this report, I want to leave you on an extremely exciting note. Silver has been forming a powerful chart pattern known as a cup and handle for the past six decades. This pattern indicates that once silver breaks out, it will almost certainly soar to at least several hundred dollars an ounce.

I believe a reasonable target is between $300 and $500, and that does not even factor in the inevitability of hyperinflation, which will send silver to prices measured not just in hundreds, but in billions and even trillions of dollars per ounce.

So this brings us back to the critical $50 threshold that I have discussed throughout this report. In order to confirm the cup and handle pattern and the extremely bullish scenario, silver must decisively close above that level. As I said earlier, that will be a game changer for investor sentiment toward silver, because once it happens, nobody who has ever bought will be holding at a loss.

The story will shift from years of frustration to stories of incredible fortunes made, the kind of life-changing, generational wealth that investors dream of. I am excited and waiting for that breakout, but silver may pause for a period of time to catch its breath first, and I actually hope it does because I want to make a few more purchases before it takes off for good.

So in conclusion, I have made the case throughout this report that while silver’s rallies in 1980 and 2011 were short-lived spikes that ended in spectacular crashes and left investors discouraged for decades, the current move is very different. This time, silver is in a sustainable and organic bull market in which prices will rise significantly and remain at those high levels permanently.

One of the key reasons that outcome will happen is because silver today is much cheaper than it was in 1980 and 2011 when measured against multiple benchmarks, including inflation, the money supply, gold, the U.S. national debt, and the stock market. These are extremely exciting and promising times for precious metals investors, and I am grateful to have you on this journey with me. I hope you prosper greatly in the years ahead.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 21:40

Most Of The World’s Largest Trash Heaps Are In The US

0
Most Of The World’s Largest Trash Heaps Are In The US

Most of the world’s largest trash heaps are in the United States.

As Statista’s Anna Fleck details below, according to crowdsourced data verified by the collaborative online platform Waste Atlas, the former dumpsite Fresh Kills tops the list. The site is estimated to contain 220 million tonnes of waste, including debris from the September 11 attacks. It closed in 2001 and a public park is now being built on top of it.

Infographic: The World's Biggest Trash Heaps | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

Fresh Kills was historically established as a dumpsite in the mid 20th century, at which time it lacked the environmental safeguards, such as impermeable liners and leachate collection systems, to safely contain and manage waste in a way that would qualify as a sanitary landfill site.

The other major unregulated dumpsite to appear on this list is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, found in the North Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and California. It is thought to measure 100 million tonnes. However, estimates vary considerably, with The Ocean Cleanup project suggesting the patch contains closer to 100,000 tonnes of garbage. This is partly due to the fact it does not have a defined boundary as it is made up of floating plastic and microplastics, which are constantly in motion due to ocean currents and winds.

As the following chart shows, Sudokwon landfill in South Korea is the only other site in the roundup outside of the United States. Containing 65 million tonnes of waste, it comes in rank four. The site is expected to stop accepting non-incinerated waste next year due to limited capacity, according to The Korea Times.

The U.S. faces a major waste problem, with a high reliance on single-use and disposable plastics as well as a culture of low recycling and composting rates. According to environmental health consultancy CLYME Environmental, the U.S. could run out of existing landfill space by 2036.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 21:20

How To Mayweather Counterpunch The Democrats

0
How To Mayweather Counterpunch The Democrats

Authored by Steve Cortes via RealClearPolitics,

The Democrats have shut down the government because they’re putting illegal immigrants ahead of American citizens.

Do not listen to Chuck Schumer or any of his allies in the corporate media when they spin about this critical point. As Vice President JD Vance correctly points out: “It’s not something that we made up. It’s not a talking point. It is in the text of the bill that they initially gave to us to reopen the government.”

The Dems nuked a near-term CR budget fix because they insisted on taxpayer-funded healthcare for foreign migrants who do not even belong in America, and no longer have legal status here, under President Trump’s leadership.

So, here we are. We didn’t ask for this fight. But in politics – and in life – sometimes the fight comes to you, and you have no choice but to engage. In this case, if the Trump administration pursues the correct, and totally legal, agenda, then we can make the Democrats regret ever going down this path. In other words, “Dems, don’t threaten us with a good time!”

It is time to counterpunch, and not mildly. Rather, it’s time for a Floyd “Money” Mayweather approach to politics and policy. The Democrats just flung the door open for the America First movement to make good on the promises of the 2024 campaign, to truly reshape, resize, and remake government in permanent ways that can benefit Americans for decades to come.

The main mechanism, of course, is mass firings. Not temporary furloughs of unnecessary federal bureaucrats, mind you, but rather a thorough, legal, lasting deck cleaning. Saying a permanent goodbye to legions of non-critical federal workers, that kind of action represents the “Mayweather” punch back at the radical Democrats. It is not some wild, purely reactionary defensive salvo, but rather a precise and unstoppable counterpunch knockout to the administrative state of Washington, D.C.

That industry of Permanent Washington, it exists for its own benefits and perquisites. Consider, for example, that the average federal employee in the Washington, D.C., area makes $127,000 per year in salary and benefits, according to Zip Recruiter. Even worse than the lavish pay that we provide, these bloated bureaucrats are often lazy and, when they do decide to work, have abused their power to reign like unelected monarchs over regular Americans and small businesses.

But the people now have the legal route to strike back. Even the Washington Post admits this reality, writing that “President Trump and his budget director, Russell Vought, now have extraordinary power…[deciding] which government workers to permanently lay off.”

So, this Democrat-created crisis represents a truly unique opportunity to clean house, slash waste, reduce deficits, and restore a government built on common sense and restraint. Plus, the timing could not be more opportune, as America struggles to manage a gargantuan $37 trillion federal debt.

And here’s the tactical side of the showdown: These are the fights Donald Trump has thrived on his entire career. “The Art of the Deal” isn’t about pinstripes and flash – it’s about leverage, persuasion, and turning the tables. His adversaries get distracted by the show, just like in “A Bronx Tale,” missing the moves that really matter.

Like the honey badger, he doesn’t care. And neither do the American people. We’re focused on results – delivering on the mandate voters gave us.

That mandate is for prosperity – and for an America that doesn’t just survive, but leads the world into a new golden age. And as we approach our 250th anniversary, that vision matters more than ever.

We live in an era of disruption. It’s unstoppable. Government resisted this disruption only through artificial means because of the inertia of Washington to grow constantly for over a century, since the awful Progressive Era. But now, time is up, and the Dems themselves just handed Republicans the power to finally, at long last, start to crush the pernicious administrative state, along with the punishing debt it created.

In a sense, Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries did us a huge, historic favor. Thanks, guys! Now get ready to help your Washington bureaucrat pals pack up their stuff, cause we are taking back our country.

As we head into the mighty semiquincentennial birthday of our amazing Republic, it is time to act. Knock out the Leviathan. In its place, build a society of prosperity and security that evolves into America’s golden age. Let’s get it done.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 21:00

Trump World Tower, Israeli Consulate In NYC Listed As “Protest Targets” Tomorrow

0
Trump World Tower, Israeli Consulate In NYC Listed As “Protest Targets” Tomorrow

Two years after the October 7, 2023, attacks that plunged Gaza into war, the Trump administration is pushing forward with a Gaza ceasefire plan that began with indirect talks between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators on Monday evening. According to CNN, the two sides are expected to continue meeting over the next few days with mediators from the U.S., Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey present. 

The second anniversary of the attack on Israel by Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups is tomorrow, and there’s an early indication that pro-Palestinian protesters could mobilize in New York City, Manhattan Institute analyst Stu Smith wrote on X.

Smith wrote on X that the front group “Behind Enemy Lines” released targets across New York City, including “businesses tied to the President’s family, Democratic offices, major universities, consulates, Jewish organizations, and even private companies.” 

“No business as usual. Escalate for Gaza,” read the flyer that the Manhattan Institute analyst posted on X.

On the group’s website, it emphasized, “The empire is the enemy. From the belly of the beast, we choose to resist it.” 

There is a lot of Marxist undertones on the site, and it’s not necessarily about helping poor Palestinians, but in fact used as a cover for their ultimate aim to destroy the U.S. from within. 
“On the second anniversary of the Al-Aqsa flood, Behind Enemy Lines is calling on everyone to escalate for Gaza and shut down business as usual,” the website continued. 

Civil terrorism expert Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising provides insight into Behind Enemy Lines and how it aligns with the rise of leftist political violence:

Behind Enemy Lines qualifies as an anarchist group IMO, because they have done very little outside from advocating for political violence. At least with ‘social justice’ or ‘racial justice’ advocacy groups, they can (and do) qualify for tax-exempt status (which they then abuse), but Behind Enemy Lines didn’t even do that. They have a donation link through GiveButter.com, a website often used to raise money for anarchist groups and their bail funds. 

While it is hard for the public to tell how dangerous Behind Enemy Lines is, their recent campaign of providing maps of targets to “Escalate for Gaza” on October 7th is a cause of major concern to everyone on that list, including Trump Tower, the Jewish National Fund, and Senator Chuck Schumer, whose home is listed in the map.  

Behind Enemy Lines draws its framework from a revolutionary following, and these lists provide targets and encourage action against them. 

Given the country’s recent escalations of political violence, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk and incidents at ICE facilities, Behind Enemy Lines knows exactly what they are doing. One of the things that the public needs to understand is that the process of being induced into political violence perfectly mirrors the way martyrs are convinced to participate in Islamic terrorism. 

Step one is being introduced to this worldview. Step two is believing it. Step three is believing that political (or Islamic) violence is the answer. Step four is participating in political violence. 

The majority of America’s radical left pro-Palestine groups and anarchist groups are all in phase three and increasingly participating in stage four. Hundreds of these organizations and activists are openly calling for escalations of violence against the West, both at protests and onto social media megaphones, just hoping someone will respond to their call to action and commit the political violence they are calling for. 

Also, given what I know about them (from seeing them in person), Beyond Enemy Lines members include students, faculty, and ordinary members, making it harder to define than a nonprofit or explicit student group.

Yet more left-wing groups are hiding under popular causes such as Palestine, BLM, and climate activism – all sharing one very similar goal: they hate capitalism, despise the West and Christianity, and, most importantly, want to collapse America from within by sowing chaos.

To counter this radical leftist movement, the Trump administration is organizing a task force to “dismantle” these groups. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 20:40

Clarifying Putin’s Comments About Poland’s Pre-World War II Policy

0
Clarifying Putin’s Comments About Poland’s Pre-World War II Policy

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Putin commented on Poland’s pre-World War II policy during the Q&A session that followed his speech at the Valdai Club’s latest annual meeting. Before clarifying what he said, readers should review this piece here about why Putin spent so much time talking about Poland in last year’s interview with Tucker, this one here about whether he really justified the Nazis’ invasion of Poland, and this one here about the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

With this context in mind, here are Putin’s latest words on this subject:

“Poland made many mistakes before World War II. After all, Germany offered them a peaceful resolution to the Danzig and Danzig Corridor issue, but the Polish leadership of the time categorically refused and ultimately fell first victim to Nazi aggression.

And Poland completely rejected something else—but historians probably know this—at that time, Poland refused the Soviet Union’s aid to Czechoslovakia. The Soviet Union was prepared to do so; we have documents in our archives, I’ve read them all myself. When the notes were written to Poland, Poland said it would under no circumstances allow Russian troops to aid Czechoslovakia, and if Soviet planes flew, Poland would shoot them down—and ultimately, it fell first victim to Nazi aggression.

If today’s top political family in Poland also remembers, understanding all the complexities and twists and turns of historical eras of various kinds, and it keeps these mistakes in mind when consulting with Pilsudski, then this would actually be a good thing.”

His reference to “consulting with Pilsudski” was due to him being asked about new Polish President Karol Nawrocki humorously going along with an interviewer playfully wondering whether he does this in the Belweder Palace where Poland’s famous independence hero and interwar leader resided. Russian media misunderstood the “infotainment” purpose of him participating in this gag, however, and unironically reported on it in full seriousness. With that out of the way, it’s now time to clarify Putin’s comments.

He’s arguably making two historical points that he then hopes his new Polish counterpart will generalize and consequently apply in the present. They’re that World War II might have been avoided had Poland allowed the Soviets to come to Czechoslovakia’s aid against Nazi Germany or then later peacefully resolved their own dispute without resisting and officially embroiling its formal British and French mutual defense allies in what ultimately became a continental tragedy. This is the Russian position.

As for the Polish one, they feared that the first scenario would lead to the Red Army seizing the Polish-controlled parts of Western Belarus and Ukraine that they partitioned after the Polish-Bolshevik War, thus coercing Poland into becoming a Soviet client state after the Nazis’ defeat. Regarding the second scenario, they feared that ceding Danzig would lead to more cessions of formerly Prussian-partitioned Poland, thus coercing Poland into becoming a Nazi client state. It’s unimportant whether one agrees.

Both schools of thought on this were only shared so that readers can make up their own minds. Moving along, the two historical points that Putin made from the Russian position can be generalized as Poland having made major mistakes by not letting Moscow preemptively deal with a latent security threat to Europe and then rejecting a political deal for preventing a larger war afterwards, despite how flawed it was. Again, one doesn’t have to agree, but this is arguably the essence of what Putin was conveying.

The first generalized point relates to contemporary times in the sense of Poland having made a major mistake by backing February 2014’s coup in Ukraine instead of letting the deal that it agreed to with France, Germany, and Ukraine with Russia’s blessing unfold for de-escalating growing East-West tensions. Regarding the second, it’s relevant with respect to Poland colluding with the UK to sabotage spring 2022’s peace talks, after which what could have otherwise been a minor war exploded into a larger one.

These complementary mistakes in contemporary times contributed to bringing Europe to the brink of another tragedy. Putin thus hopes that Nawrocki will understand the generalized points that he sought to convey via his critiques of Poland’s pre-World War II policy given the latter’s prior role as his country’s top historian. If he does, then he might apply them to the present by encouraging a political solution to the Ukrainian Conflict instead of helping the West escalate tensions at the risk of sparking World War III.

Nawrocki importantly didn’t rule out talking with Putin if Poland’s security depended on it when asked about this in an interview several days before his Russian counterpart’s comments. His predecessor Andrzej Duda, previous Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, and his successor Donald Tusk had and have no interest whatsoever in talking to Putin about anything no matter the circumstances. For this reason, Nawrocki’s approach is pragmatic and even brave given the domestic Polish political context.

This doesn’t mean that he’ll soon call Putin, just that Putin was likely aware of what Nawrocki said and tried to convey – however wonkishly and indirectly – that he’d be receptive to any outreach from him. That’s what Putin’s comments on Poland’s pre-World War II policy aimed to achieve. They weren’t meant to blame Poland for World War II like some might imagine, but to prevent World War III given Poland’s central role in that prior tragedy and the one that might still happen if tensions spiral out of control.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/06/2025 – 20:20