46.8 F
Chicago
Saturday, May 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 171

GLP-1 Feud Ends: NOVO, HIMS Join Forces (Again) To Sell Obesity Drugs

GLP-1 Feud Ends: NOVO, HIMS Join Forces (Again) To Sell Obesity Drugs

The epic, months-long GLP-1 feud between Novo Nordisk and telehealth firm Hims & Hers Health appears to be coming to a surprising end, with both companies reportedly set to announce, as soon as Monday, a new partnership that would allow the Danish drugmaker to sell Wegovy through HIMS’ platform.

Bloomberg published the report late Friday, stating:

Novo Nordisk A/S plans to sell its weight-loss drugs on Hims & Hers Health Inc.’s platform, according to a person familiar with the matter…

Novo and Hims plan to announce a new partnership as soon as Monday, according to the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The two companies had a similar agreement last year, but Novo abruptly scrapped it after Hims refused to stop marketing and selling copycat medications.

The move is very surprising because NOVO sued HIMS just last month over a copycat Wegovy pill and patent infringement tied to Ozempic and Wegovy. Even the head of the FDA recently stated that telehealth firms were put on notice about copycat GLP-1s.

“There is no other way to describe the Hims news as both a surprise and an unabashed positive for Hims’ stock,” Leerink Partners analyst Michael Cherny wrote in a note to clients.

NOVO ADRs rose 2% in after-hours trading on Friday following the report, while HIMS shares surged nearly 40%. The new partnership would effectively end the GLP-1 feud between the two companies.

“We get the rationale for Novo here,” Cherny added. “The company has been looking to add as many partners as it can to drive market reach, including other digital pharmacies and CVS.”

The rationale for why the feud ended will likely be explained by NOVO executives and/or HIMS executives on Monday morning, if the Bloomberg report is correct. It’s clear that the feud’s end was likely tied to the terrible year-to-date performance of both companies (data below as of close on Friday).

NOVO’s willingness to partner with HIMS (again) comes as its new GLP-1 pill has yet to help it gain the momentum to acquire enough new market share to reverse the stock plunge amid a highly competitive obesity space. Additionally, the new CEO is under pressure from investors to reverse the multi-year stock plunge and to offer hope amid a recently dismal outlook for the year.

Also this week, Novo’s biggest bull, Goldman analyst James Quigley, downgraded the stock from “Buy” to “Hold.” Quigley’s full note can be viewed here and is available to pro subs. How long until Quigley reverses this call?

With the feud now apparently over, here is our past reporting:

We noted on X:

It’s worth noting that HIMS’ float is 39.65% short, or 81 million shares.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 16:45

Trump Announces Military Coalition With Latin American Leaders To Eradicate Cartels

Trump Announces Military Coalition With Latin American Leaders To Eradicate Cartels

Authored by Emel Akan and T.J.Muscaro via The Epoch Times,

U.S. President Donald Trump on March 7 welcomed his Latin American allies to Florida for a summit focused on addressing regional issues and announced a new military coalition to combat drug cartels in the Western Hemisphere.

“On this historic day, we come together to announce a brand new military coalition to eradicate the criminal cartels plaguing our region,” Trump said as he began his remarks at the summit.

He said that the new partnership, called the Americas Counter Cartel Coalition, will leverage military resources, including the possible use of missiles, to combat the cartels.

The heads of state of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, and Trinidad and Tobago attended today’s summit, the White House said.

The event, called the Shield of the Americas Summit, is taking place at Trump National Doral Club in Miami and is the first such regional meeting to bring together, as the State Department described, “like-minded allies” in the Western Hemisphere.

“We’re going to be doing some incredible things together,” Trump told the leaders.

All countries in attendance are governed by right-wing or center-right parties, while left-leaning governments such as Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico did not participate in the summit.

On March 5, Trump announced that outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem will lead the effort as special envoy for the Shield of the Americas.

During his remarks, Trump criticized previous U.S. administrations for abandoning the Western Hemisphere.

“They went so far away. They went to these faraway places where they weren’t even wanted,” Trump said.

The Donroe Doctrine

In its national security strategy released in November 2025, the Trump administration made the Western Hemisphere its top priority, stating that it was a “great American strategic mistake of recent decades” to allow “non-Hemispheric competitors” to take hold in the region.

The Trump administration compared its new policy to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, a U.S. policy that told European powers to stay out of the Americas.

After that, some media outlets began calling it the “Donroe Doctrine,” and the Trump administration adopted the term.

“It is a doctrine we will not allow hostile foreign influence to gain a foothold in this hemisphere that includes the Panama Canal,” Trump said without citing China during his speech.

Over the last two decades, China has become a dominant force in Latin America and the Caribbean, with trade surpassing $500 billion in 2024. In countries such as Brazil and Peru, China has replaced the United States as a key trading partner.

In recent years, more than 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries have joined Beijing’s Belt and Road initiative. As a result, China has secured hundreds of infrastructure projects, gaining control of assets, including ports, throughout the region.

In January, U.S. forces captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in Caracas, effectively ending Venezuela’s relationship with China. Last week, Trump suggested that Cuba might be next.

“Cuba’s at the end of the line,” Trump said at the event, adding that the regime in Havana is negotiating with him and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

“But, our focus right now is on Iran,” Trump said.

The summit comes amid a tense geopolitical backdrop, with the conflict in Iran entering its second week.

On Feb. 28, Iran’s Islamic leader, Ali Khamenei, and dozens of top leadership figures were killed in the U.S.–Israeli joint military operation. Since then, Tehran has launched a series of retaliatory attacks across the region.

The Hezbollah terrorist group, an Iran proxy, has networks in Latin America and, for years, used the Western Hemisphere for money laundering, fundraising, and terrorism.

US Offers Military Training

During the event, Trump signed a proclamation formally launching the new military coalition.

“Every leader here today is united in the conviction that we cannot and will not tolerate the lawlessness in our hemisphere any longer,” Trump said.

“You have some great police, but they threaten your police, they scare your police,” Trump added, referring to drug cartels.

“You’re going to use your military. In many cases, our forces have already been working closely with yours, and the United States looks forward to deepening and expanding that cooperation in the months ahead.”

U.S. Southern Command announced recently that Ecuadorian and U.S. military forces conducted joint operations against “designated terrorist organizations” in Ecuador as part of the U.S. effort to fight narco-terrorism.

The proclamation states that the United States will train and mobilize the militaries of partner nations to help dismantle cartels.

According to the proclamation, the United States and its allies should prevent external threats, including malign foreign influences from outside the Western Hemisphere.

Seventeen countries are signatories to this partnership.

The leaders attending the Miami summit are Javier Milei, president of Argentina; Rodrigo Paz Pereira, president of Bolivia; Jose Antonio Kast, president-elect of Chile; Rodrigo Chaves Robles, president of Costa Rica; Luis Rodolfo Abinader Corona, president of the Dominican Republic; Daniel Roy Gilchrist Noboa Azín, president of Ecuador; Nayib Bukele, president of El Salvador; Mohamed Irfaan Ali, president of Guyana; Nasry “Tito” Asfura, president of Honduras; José Raúl Mulino Quintero, president of Panama; Santiago Peña, president of Paraguay; and Kamla Persad-Bissessar, prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 16:15

A ‘War Of The Oil Refineries’ Opens As Israel Bombs Key Tehran Sites, After Which Haifa Refinery Targeted

A ‘War Of The Oil Refineries’ Opens As Israel Bombs Key Tehran Sites, After Which Haifa Refinery Targeted

Update(1425): Is a tit-for-tat oil depot war opening? This could be the next phase of escalation, already in progress.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) says it has struck Israel’s Haifa refinery, framing the attack as direct retaliation for fresh Israeli strikes on energy infrastructure inside Iran.

Iranian media alleged that US and Israeli warplanes started the tit-for-tat by hitting an oil depot in southern Tehran. The semi-official Fars News Agency reported the storage site was among the latest targets in the ongoing major bombing campaign across the country.

Meanwhile, Tehran itself is again under heavy assault, with reports that a major Tehran refinery has been hit.

Massive fireballs above Tehran:

* * *

Update(1310ET): Are we witnessing an olive branch from Tehran? That’s assuming that President Pezeshkian and the Foreign Ministery are even in charge – also as the IRGC is clearly running this war, and may have already even issued orders for autonomy/division of action among the various military command chains. Here’s the message that Iran’s Foreign Ministry put out moments ago:

President Pezeshkian expressed openness to de-escalation within our region-provided that our neighbors’ airspace, territory, and waters are not used to attack the Iranian People. Gesture to our neighbors was almost immediately killed by President Trump.

Saturday has clearly seen a continuation of Iranian drone and missile attacks on Gulf countries, including a direct drone hit on Dubai international airport Saturday morning

And into Saturday evening in Iran (local):

So de-escalation does not in fact seem to be happening, also as there are reports of a third US supercarrier en route to the region, possibly to relieve the long-deployed USS Gerald R. Ford carrier. Here is the Iranian Foreign Minister’s statement. 

Below is the latest on the potential third carrier deployment, which would be a first since Bush’s Iraq war (having three carriers in the Mideast theatre), per FOX and open source reporting:

The U.S. Navy is preparing to deploy a third carrier strike group to the Middle East near Iran in the coming weeks, according to a report by Fox News, with the USS George H. W. Bush (CVN-77) and her Carrier Strike Group having now completing their Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUEX), expected to depart from Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia sometime before the end of March for a regularly scheduled deployment to the U.S. 5th Fleet Area-of-Responsibility. However, due to the ongoing hostilities with Iran, it is not known if she will relieve the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), who entered the Red Sea on Thursday and has been deployed now for nearly 11-months, or if she will arrive to further reinforce the U.S. Navy in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, Iran state media says a new Supreme Leader could be chosen within the next 24 hours, as no doubt the various reformist vs. hardline factions are jostling – likely with the more conservative candidates to win out.

* * *

As the US-Israeli war on Iran grinds into its second week, having completed a full week of what’s largely been escalation alongside no real efforts at talks, the rhetoric on all sides is still expanding just as fast as the missile exchanges. Iran continues to get bombed very intensely, while several overnight ballistic missile and drone waves hit Israel.

The biggest development is that Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Tehran will never capitulate, pushing back after Donald Trump demanded Iran’s “unconditional surrender”. But unexpectedly Pezeshkian has apologized to Gulf countries for coming under attack.

But strangely, in something which suggests how little in control Pezeshkian actually is (as more likely the IRGC is running the show, also as the Council of Experts delays choosing a Khamenei successor), Iran has continued launching drones and missiles toward Israel and targets across the Gulf – again, even as officials insist Tehran has no intention of attacking neighboring states unless attacks originate from their territory.

Trump, however, is already declaring victory while promising even more escalation. Posting on Truth Social, the president warned that “today Iran will be hit very hard” while saying that new targets could soon be added. “Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time,” Trump wrote.

He also claimed Tehran had effectively backed down in the region, saying Pezeshkian had “surrendered” to neighboring countries and “promised that it will not shoot at them anymore.” According to Trump, “This promise was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack.”

And yet…

The president went further, declaring:

Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse! Today Iran will be hit very hard!

On the ground, the ‘second front’ of the conflict is widening: Israeli air and ground raids on the Lebanese town of Nabi Chit in the eastern Bekaa Valley reportedly killed at least 41 people, as fighting with Hezbollah intensifies. Beirut has also been getting bombed from the air, with whole buildings leveled.

Meanwhile Saudi Arabia says it newly intercepted two ballistic missiles headed toward Prince Sultan Air Base and drones targeting the Shaybah oilfield.

Rare close-up Tel Aviv strike footage, with Iron Dome clearly struggling and failing in this instance:

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is warning the region could quickly spiral further, freshly announcing that all US and Israeli bases and interests will be treated as “primary targets” if attacks on Iran continue. This does not feel very ‘de-escalationy’ at all, or a country that is actually ‘apologizing’ to its Gulf neighbors.

Tehran is also busy issuing internal warnings to its population as the war expands, warning firmly against any anti-government protests while the country is under attack. Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence accused what it called “American-Zionist mercenaries” of photographing missile impact sites and sending footage to “terrorist satellite networks” abroad, warning citizens that assisting foreign media or intelligence operations will be treated as a national security offense.

Over in Israel, there’s also a similarly heavy military censorship campaign and apparent attempt to conceal the true extent of damage after a week of war. Israeli media on Saturday morning reported the eighth missile launch since midnight, but with the projectile reportedly intercepted.

Strike on Tehran this week, AFP/Getty Images

In the Gulf, the IRGC claimed responsibility for striking another tanker on Saturday. According to Sepah News, “An oil tanker with the trade name Louise P with the flag of the Marshall Islands, one of the assets of the terrorist America, was hit by a drone in the middle of the Persian Gulf.” And quickly after, reports of a second, via Bloomberg:

Another bulk carrier signaled it was Chinese-owned as it sailed through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf that’s been effectively closed for a week due to multiple attacks in the area. 

The Liberia-flagged Sino Ocean broadcast its destination signal as “CHINA OWNER_ALL CREW” as it traversed the chokepoint. The vessel exited the strait Saturday, according to ship-tracking data, after picking up its cargo from the United Arab Emirates’ Mina Saqr port on March 5.

Meanwhile, the almost daily changing White House talking points on the war – whether related to justification or moving goalposts and objectives – appears to be running up against the realism consensus of the intelligence community.

A classified US National Intelligence Council assessment reportedly concluded that even a large-scale assault on Iran would be unlikely to topple the Islamic Republic. According to The Washington Post the report was completed roughly a week before the war began, and it outlined succession scenarios if Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei were killed, concluding institutional mechanisms would likely keep the system intact and that opposition groups were “unlikely” to seize power.

There continues to be speculation and back-and-forth over the true depth of Iran’s ballistic missile capability: running low or just getting started? It’s impossible for outside observers to know for sure…

Back in the US, there is a somber moment as the bodies of six American service members killed in the conflict are scheduled to arrive at Dover Air Force Base for a dignified transfer ceremony, which both Trump and Vice President JD Vance are attending.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 15:25

Stablecoins And The Rebasement Of The Dollar

Stablecoins And The Rebasement Of The Dollar

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

The “fiat is dying” argument has become a catchphrase narrative among digital asset bulls, gold bugs, and cryptocurrency advocates. That narrative’s core is that central banks have printed vast amounts of money. The “money printing” has led to currency debasement and rendered the U.S. dollar obsolete. We discussed this “debasement” narrative previously.

The narrative is seductive: inflation is out of control, the government is printing money, and the dollar is on its last legs. But while there are real risks to watch, most headlines sell fear rather than fact. It’s striking, and those selling gold, silver, or other doomsday assets often use it to scare individuals into taking action. One of their favorite charts used to make the “debasement” case is the classic graph showing that the U.S. dollar has lost 90% of its purchasing power since 1966.”

But here’s the thing: that chart doesn’t show debasement. It only reflects inflation, a well-understood and largely expected outcome in a growing economy. Prices rise over time because demand increases due to population growth, rising incomes, and growing consumption. This is especially true in a post-industrial, service-driven economy that incentivizes credit expansion and capital investment. In other words, it’s not the dollar losing value; it’s the economy expanding.

What those promoting the “debasement” argument misunderstand is how economics and modern inflation work. What the chart shows, in today’s economy, is only the loss of purchasing power of idle, or uninvested, dollars. Dollars that sit uninvested lose value relative to inflation over time. That is not a collapse of fiat currency. It is a signal to put capital to work. While the “gold bugs” argue that gold protects against debasement (i.e., inflation), which is true, so do 3-month T-bills and US Treasury bonds on a real, inflation-adjusted, total return basis. However, that same $1 invested in the S&P 500 index was by far the best protector of the purchasing power of the U.S. Dollar

Most importantly, the term “debasement” does not refer to the collapse of currency. It is only a reflection of inflation on uninvested dollars.” Inflation erodes purchasing power if income and returns do not keep pace. A $100 bill in your pocket today buys less than it did in 2010, only because the general price level of goods and services purchased in an expanding economy rises over time. That effect is real, but it is a natural consequence of economic activity and monetary policy interacting with growth, not a structural collapse of confidence.

In reality, the dollar remains dominant. As we discussed in depth in “The Dollar’s Death Is Greatly Exaggerated:”

  • Roughly 80 percent of global transactions use the U.S. dollar as the unit of account or settlement.

  • The U.S. dollar still accounts for nearly 60 percent of global foreign-exchange reserves held by central banks.

  • There is no alternative currency or asset with the depth, liquidity, and institutional trust of the U.S. dollar.

These facts contradict the idea that the world is abandoning fiat currencies or the U.S. dollar. The narrative that the dollar is dying ignores the overwhelming evidence of continued international demand and use, which is why foreign buying of US Treasuries has surged to a record.

The Illusion of Escape

Individuals who argue that investors are buying gold or Bitcoin by clinging to the “debasement” narrative are either intentionally trying to deceive others or are ignorant of how the monetary system, and the fundamental unit of pricing, exchange, and settlement, works in the modern economy.

We absolutely agree that investors should invest their “idle” dollars into “risk assets” like bonds, gold, stocks, or Bitcoin to protect their savings from inflation over time. However, the gains in those assets that rise in nominal terms only reflect shifts in relative valuation, not an abandonment of the dollar itself. Furthermore, while those buying into “debasement” fears, mostly due to headlines rather than the facts, seek so‑called “safe havens,” by buying Bitcoin or gold, thinking they are abandoning “fiat” money.

However, such is not the case as these assets are still priced and settled in dollars. Bitcoin trades in USD pairs, and gold’s global market price is quoted in dollars. When holders want to spend or transact outside the digital asset context, they must convert back into the dollar system. The belief that one can truly escape fiat is a philosophical idea. In practical terms, value transfer and utility still revolve around dollars. As shown above, the absolute best way to protect your purchasing power from “debasement” has been the US stock market.

While the “debasement” narrative often claims that US Treasuries are undesirable relics of a failing system, the reality is the opposite. US Treasuries remain the most liquid, trusted financial instruments on the planet. They are central to global interest rate benchmarks, risk‑free rate calculations, collateral markets, and international reserves.

Furthermore, a new development in today’s economy is about to make the US Dollar even more dominant: USD Stable Coins.

USD Stablecoins and Why They are Needed

As explained, the US Dollar is, and will remain, the backbone of global finance. That won’t change in the near or distant future, primarily because there are no realistic alternatives. However, the rise of USD stablecoins will likely cement that dominance even further.

Currently, nearly 99 percent of fiat‑backed stablecoins are pegged to the US dollar, as the US dollar dominates global foreign exchange reserves. The dollar’s share of global reserves continues to outweigh other major currencies combined, demonstrating that sovereign confidence in USD persists even amid inflation concerns. More notably, USD Stable Coins reflect the dollar’s strength, not its demise.

So, what are USD Stablecoins? They are digital tokens designed to maintain a 1:1 peg to the US dollar. Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ether, which can swing wildly in price, stablecoins offer price stability by holding reserves of high‑quality liquid assets. The largest examples are Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, which together account for over 90 percent of the USD stablecoin market. For context, as of late 2025, Tether (the issuer of the USDT stablecoin) held over $135 billion in U.S. Treasury securities, ranking it 17th globally among holders of U.S. sovereign debt. Tether’s holdings exceed those of South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and the UAE.

Here is why this is critical to the “death of the dollar” narrative.

USD Stablecoins operate on blockchain networks, enabling real‑time settlement and global transfer of digital dollars without traditional banking intermediaries. This capability is especially valuable for cross-border transactions, remittances, and markets with less developed banking infrastructure. The International Monetary Fund notes that while most current stablecoin turnover is tied to crypto trading, cross‑border flows are rapidly growing, suggesting future use in broader financial systems. As noted by Chainstack:

“Stablecoins have moved into mainstream finance, linking bank systems with digital asset networks. Dollar-pegged tokens already move volumes on par with major payment networks, with transactions rivaling those of ACH, Visa, and PayPal. In mid-2025, the supply of stablecoins crossed $250B, reflecting demand for quicker, always-on payments.”

While transaction volume still remains very small (about 1% of the current global cross-border payment volume, a $2 quadrillion annual market, there are several reasons why many expect the USD Stable Coin market to grow substantially in the future.

These use cases appeal to global finance as it modernizes payment systems. If USD Stable Coins realize broader adoption, they could become core infrastructure for digital money flows, making US Treasuries even more important to the global financial system.

How USD Stablecoins Could Make US Treasuries Even More Important

The presence of these assets in USD Stablecoin reserves underscores that the digital dollar infrastructure is intertwined with US sovereign debt markets rather than outside them. As the USD Stable Coin market grows, its relationship with US Treasuries could become more significant as issuers must hold liquid, low‑risk assets to maintain dollar pegs and meet regulatory and market expectations. Because short‑term Treasuries are widely accepted collateral and deeply liquid, they are a natural choice.

Regulatory developments, such as the GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, require stablecoin issuers to back their tokens with high‑quality liquid assets, such as USD or short‑dated Treasury instruments, increasing the likelihood that reserves remain closely tied to US sovereign debt. Furthermore, if and when the STABLE Act passes, it would impose additional requirements on stablecoin issuers to maintain safe, highly liquid assets as backing.

As such, Industry projections suggest the USD Stablecoin market could reach $2–$3 trillion by 2030, driven by clearer regulation and broader financial adoption. In that scenario, stablecoin reserve demand for Treasuries could become a meaningful incremental buyer in money markets, potentially supplementing traditional Treasury demand. Reuters reported that up to 80 percent of the existing stablecoin market’s reserves are in Treasury bills and repos, indicating that current reserve practices already lean heavily toward Treasuries.

Lastly, academic research suggests USD Stablecoin demand has already been large enough to influence short‑term yields. For example, one study found stablecoin purchases of Treasury bills correlated with measurable downward pressure on one‑month yields, highlighting how digital dollar reserve demand can affect real markets.

However, any discussion of USD Stablecoins must recognize the risks. Most importantly, this thesis assumes that USD stablecoins will become a broader global transaction utility. That is a “possible” future, not a certain one. Currently, high usage of USD stablecoins is concentrated in crypto trading and settlement, not in mainstream commerce or sovereign payments. Adoption depends on regulatory frameworks, institutional engagement, and global trust.

Custodial risk remains a valid concern. S&P Global Ratings recently downgraded Tether’s stability assessment, noting that only 64% of its reserves were held in short‑term US Treasuries and that transparency issues persist. This underscores the importance of clearer reporting, stronger governance, and more regulated custody solutions if stablecoins are to scale safely.

“Bitcoin represents 5.6% of USDT in circulation, exceeding the 3.9% overcollateralization margin associated with a collateralization ratio of 103.9%. A decline in the price of bitcoin or the value of other higher-risk assets could therefore reduce collateral coverage.” – S&P Global

There is also competition from central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Governments might choose their own digital money rails, which could reduce the appeal of private USD Stable Coins in certain use cases; however, even if CBDCs gain substantial traction, they will likely also be backed by US Treasuries for the reasons listed herein.

Another risk is that as demand for Treasuries rises, yields will fall. However, while issuers of USD Stable Coins would likely shift reserve composition, the underlying assets remain dollar‑linked securities. This distinction is critical, as whether stablecoin issuers hold T‑bills, repos, or other short‑term dollar assets, the peg to the dollar persists. The system will continue to operate within the dollar monetary framework, not in an alternate monetary universe.

Finally, there is ALWAYS a risk that none of this materializes at the expected scale. Regulatory setbacks, technological barriers, or shifts in macroeconomic conditions could stall growth. While the future is never certain, the framework of USD Stable Coins and the current trajectory of technological developments suggest that how we currently transact business globally will change in the near future, and, most importantly, the US dollar will be at the center of it.

Conclusion and Investment Thesis

The narrative that “fiat is dying” is not supported by the data or reality. Inflation, while real, is not debasement in the historical sense. It’s the erosion of purchasing power on uninvested dollars in an expanding economy. The U.S. dollar remains the foundation of global finance, dominating in trade, reserves, and settlement. No alternative currency, asset, or system currently matches its liquidity, institutional trust, or market depth.

The illusion that one can escape fiat by moving into gold or Bitcoin misunderstands how the monetary system works. While those assets protect savings against inflation, they are not independent of the fiat currency system, as they are priced, settled, and used in U.S. dollars. Any claim of “escape” is more ideological than practical.

What’s emerging now is not the death of the dollar, but its “rebasement,” through the transformation of how it circulates, settles, and functions through digital infrastructure. USD Stable Coins are not a threat to the U.S. monetary system; rather, they are an extension of it. By facilitating real-time digital payments on blockchain networks while holding reserves in U.S. Treasuries and cash equivalents, USD stablecoins reinforce the dollar’s central role.

If USD stablecoins mature into a mainstream transaction utility, something that remains a forward-looking assumption, the demand for U.S. Treasuries could increase significantly. With a projected market size of $2–$3 trillion by 2030, stablecoin issuers could become significant buyers of US Treasuries. Such would deepen liquidity, support lower yields, and embed Treasury instruments even further into the plumbing of global finance.

But investors must recognize the risks. Stablecoin adoption is not a guarantee. Regulatory frameworks could stall. Custodial risks remain, particularly with non-transparent issuers. Central bank digital currencies may create competition. And if USD Stable Coins fail to expand beyond trading use cases, their impact will remain limited.

Still, the investment thesis is compelling:

  • US Treasuries remain critical. Continued and diversified demand, from both traditional buyers and digital dollar issuers, supports their role as a core asset.

  • USD stablecoin infrastructure offers opportunities for firms that provide custody, liquidity, and regulatory-compliant digital payment rails. (CRCL, COIN, PYPL, FI, V, and MA)

  • Banks and fintechs positioned at the intersection of blockchain settlement and fiat compliance may become integral to the rebasement architecture. (JPM, BK, C, SQ, and Stripe)

The dollar is not dying. It’s evolving. Notably, USD Stable Coins may serve as the bridge connecting the analog financial world to its digital future. The regulatory and technological framework is evolving. And the future of USD Stablecoins has the full weight of U.S. sovereign credit behind it. For investors willing to bet on that evolution, the opportunity lies in understanding the future of the dollar.

It’s not its destruction, but the digitization of dollar dominance.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 15:15

Iran’s New Supreme Leader To Be Chosen Within 24 Hours: State Media

Iran’s New Supreme Leader To Be Chosen Within 24 Hours: State Media

Iran could be hours away from installing a new supreme leader, with state Fars News reporting early Saturday that a successor may be selected within the next 24 hours, but there are signs of a potential factional power struggle – somewhat expected given the complex history of reform vs. hardline Islamic interpretations inside Iran.

The outlet cited sources within the Assembly of Experts, which is the 88-member body of Islamic jurists elected every eight years and tasked with choosing the country’s top clerical authority. The process was “paused” this week amid the heavy bombing campaign. 

File image: Assembly of Experts 

There were reports earlier this week that the US-Israeli Operation Epic Fury had struck a Tehran building where the Assembly of Experts were meeting, but such battlefield claims by US and Israeli officials remain hard to ultimately verify, given the intensify of the bombardment and fog of war.

The development comes as the war continues to intensify, as President Trump vows to keep hitting Iran harder.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran will “never surrender” to Washington or Tel Aviv, even as he issued an apology to neighboring Gulf states after Iranian strikes targeted locations linked to American military assets stationed in the region. And civilian sites in Gulf cities have also clearly been directly hit, such as airports – though the Iranians’ own airports have been struck.

The process for choosing a new Supreme Leaders is likely intense as the bombs fall, and there’s likely internal divide over how to handle the crisis among the country’s long-standing political factions…

One name has emerged as likely front-runner, at least according to the Western media consensus

The senior clerics responsible for selecting Iran’s next supreme leader met on Tuesday to deliberate, and the son of the slain former leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, emerged as the clear front-runner, according to three Iranian officials familiar with the deliberations.

The officials said that the clerics were considering announcing that the son, Mojtaba Khamenei, would be his father’s successor as early as Wednesday morning but that some had expressed reservations, fearing that it could expose him as a target for the United States and Israel. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations.

Indeed already the US has said that potential successors have already been taken out, including some that President Trump said he might have been OK with.

Any new Ayatollah would likely immediately be targeted especially by Israel, and is thus likely to be even more ‘hard line’ than the slain Khamenei. Even the CIA has long admitted in analysis that this will be the likely outcome.

Any new religious leader must also have the support of the hard line IRGC, which is effectively running the country and the military response at this point.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 14:45

James Woods ‘Done’ With Republican Party Over ‘Uniparty Traitors’

James Woods ‘Done’ With Republican Party Over ‘Uniparty Traitors’

Conservative actor and commentator James Woods says he’s “done” with the Republican party after ‘uniparty traitors’ like John Thune (R-SD) refuse to pass the SAVE Act (Voter ID), and blocked an attempt by Nancy Mace (R-SC) to subpoena immigration records for Rep. Ilhan Omar to settle the question of whether she’s legally in the US.

I am done with the Republican party,” Woods, 78, psted on X. “Between this and Thune’s refusal to pass the SAVE Act, I’m done with these uniparty traitors.”

“I’m changing my party affiliation to Independent. No wonder President Trump is fighting an uphill battle every day,” he added. 

Woods was replying to a video from @WallStreetApes of Mace criticizing fellow Republicans after a proposed motion seeking records related to Omar was killed in the House

“I tried to subpoena her immigration records, her brother husband’s immigration records, and IT WAS REPUBLICANS that killed my motion,” said Mace.  

GOP lawmakers have been pushing to obtain Ilhan Omar’s immigration records.

“Let’s get to the bottom of everything. I want to know if she’s here legally, If she’s not, then we need to take appropriate action,” Rep Tim Burchett (R-TN) told the NY Post in late February, urging the House Intelligence Committee to obtain the records. Mace, meanwhile, tried to have the House Oversight Committee to subpoena Omar’s records in early January. 

Mace’s subpoena specifically sought immigration records pertaining to Omar, her ex-husband Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi (also known as Ahmed Aden before he became a citizen), her other ex-husband Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and “any members” of her family.

She wanted the subpoena directed at the Department of Homeland Security and the US Citizenship and Immigration Services for “all records related to the immigration and naturalization” of those individuals.

Underpinning her subpoena push is a theory that Elmi was actually her brother and that they tied the knot for immigration reasons. That unproven theory originated in a Somali forum, according to the Minnesota Star-Tribune. -NY Post

And then there’s the other issue Woods has…

Thune and the Uniparty Traitors

Despite an overwhelming majority of Americans wanting Voter ID, Thune and other Republicans have sided with Democrats in blocking the #1 measure towards restoring faith in US elections. 

An October Gallup poll showed that roughly 80-84% of voters – including strong majorities of Democrats, independents, and Republicans – support requiring photo identification to cast a ballot and proof of citizenship for voter registration, viewing these as straightforward safeguards for election integrity rather than partisan tools.

Yet Thune has repeatedly dismissed aggressive procedural moves to advance the SAVE Act, declaring there “aren’t anywhere close to the votes, not even close” to changing or “nuking” the filibuster rules that require 60 votes to overcome Democratic opposition. He has thrown cold water on the “talking filibuster” tactic – where Democrats would be forced to hold the floor indefinitely – warning that the Republican conference lacks the necessary unity for such a strategy and that it could disrupt other priorities like DHS funding or housing legislation.

Nevermind that Democrats are going to nuke the filibuster at their earliest opportunity, so why pass the SAVE Act that would ensure Republican victories if Dems are habitually cheating (they are) to win.

Despite acknowledging broad GOP support for the bill’s substance and promising a floor vote “at some point,” Thune has not scheduled a markup or pushed forward in ways that could force the issue, effectively letting it stall under standard rules that demand at least seven Democratic defections.

At least the Democrats stage performative votes when they know they have no chance simply to get their attempt on record, so Thune is effectively running cover so Republicans don’t have to go on record over Voter ID. Strange. 

Other uniparty swamp alumni are with Thune on ths: Sens. Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, and Mitch McConnell have voiced opposition or misgivings, with Murkowski calling it “federal overreach” into state election powers, reducing the votes needed for bolder tactics. As a caucus, Senate Republicans have resisted calls from House conservatives and Trump allies to attach the bill to must-pass measures or reform the filibuster, prioritizing preservation of Senate traditions over delivering on a policy that enjoys massive public backing and aligns with core Republican promises on election security.

No wonder Woods is done.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 14:15

The AI Trade: Now With Less Circle And More Jerk

The AI Trade: Now With Less Circle And More Jerk

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

As if markets didn’t already have enough to worry about heading into the weekend — an escalating conflict involving Iran, growing stress in private credit, and the ongoing annoyance of positive real interest rates — one of the “AI will solve everything, just add capex” deals that everyone in markets have been quietly laughing about while investing in for the past year has officially started to unravel.

According to Bloomberg, Oracle Corporation and OpenAI have scrapped plans to expand a flagship artificial intelligence data center campus in Abilene, Texas after negotiations dragged on over financing and, more awkwardly, OpenAI’s “changing needs.”

Changing needs, of course, being corporate-speak for: the numbers probably stopped making sense once someone sat down with a spreadsheet and noticed that data center financing deals are starting to arrive dead on the operating table.

The project in question sits in Abilene and is being developed by Crusoe Energy Systems as part of the highly publicized Stargate initiative — one of the many AI infrastructure megaprojects that have been breathlessly announced over the past year with the implicit assumption that demand for compute will grow forever, financing will always be available, and electricity will somehow materialize in gigawatt quantities on command.

The site itself is enormous: roughly 1,000 acres of land designed to host hyperscale data center clusters that would consume multiple gigawatts of power. Portions of the facility are already operating, and construction continues. But the big expansion — the one that was supposed to anchor the next phase of the project — suddenly no longer has a tenant.

Which is not exactly the kind of development you want in the middle of what’s supposedly the most unstoppable technology boom since the internet.

Image

The timing of the headline didn’t exactly help market nerves either. The news crossed the tape around 3:00 PM EST, just as traders were already digesting a fairly ugly macro backdrop, and equities promptly faded into the close.

The late-day selling wasn’t catastrophic, but it was noticeable — exactly the kind of “huh, that’s interesting” price action that tends to get revisited when markets reopen after a weekend full of geopolitical headlines. In other words, if there’s follow-through pain on Monday, this little AI infrastructure hiccup will likely be part of the blame cocktail. The other part of the cocktail will likely be a result of the ugly headline about gating redemptions from a $26 billion fund that crossed the wire early this morning.

Into the suddenly vacant Abilene expansion steps Meta Platforms, which is now reportedly considering leasing the space. And because this is the AI industrial complex we’re talking about, the story quickly gets more entertaining.

Nvidia — the undisputed king of the AI gold rush — apparently helped facilitate the discussions between Crusoe and Meta after the Oracle/OpenAI expansion fell apart. The reason is simple: if the expansion stalled, there was a non-zero chance the project might eventually use chips from Advanced Micro Devices instead.

That would be unacceptable. So Nvidia reportedly dropped a $150 million deposit with Crusoe and began helping recruit Meta as a tenant for the facility.

Which is one way to describe it.

Another way would be: the chip supplier is now helping finance the data center just to make sure someone shows up to buy the GPUs.

Totally normal market behavior. Nothing to see here.

The irony is that none of this was supposed to be difficult. Over the past two years the AI trade has evolved into something resembling a self-reinforcing capital spending machine. AI labs promise increasingly powerful models. Hyperscalers promise increasingly massive infrastructure. Chipmakers promise increasingly powerful hardware. Investors promise increasingly large checks.

Everyone nods along because, well, AI and shit.

Tom Lee: AI trade still in very good shape fundamentally

Across 2024 and 2025 the numbers involved have become borderline surreal. Hyperscalers including Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta have been committing hundreds of billions in combined capital expenditures to AI infrastructure. Entire gigawatt-scale campuses are being designed around GPU clusters that can cost tens of billions of dollars before the first model ever runs.

In the past year alone we’ve seen announcements for multi-gigawatt AI campuses in Texas, Louisiana, Ohio, Indiana, and multiple locations across the Middle East. Power utilities are scrambling to keep up. Nuclear plants are being discussed as dedicated compute power sources. Some projects are literally being planned around their own on-site generation because local grids cannot handle the load.

All of this is happening on the assumption that demand for AI compute will grow exponentially and immediately. Which may very well turn out to be true.

But what the Abilene situation illustrates is that when you move from PowerPoint decks to pouring concrete, the math suddenly matters. These facilities cost tens of billions to build, require enormous amounts of electricity, and depend on financing structures that start to look a little less comfortable when interest rates are no longer pinned at zero.

That’s before you even get into the small detail that the companies renting the capacity need to actually generate revenue from all that compute.

It’s not a catastrophe. The campus is still being built. Oracle’s broader agreement to develop roughly 4.5 gigawatts of data center capacity for OpenAI remains intact, and the companies continue to pursue projects elsewhere, including a major facility near Detroit. But the symbolism is difficult to ignore, especially today.

Because the entire AI boom has been driven by the assumption that demand is so overwhelming that infrastructure can barely keep up. The idea that a hyperscale expansion might suddenly be looking for a tenant introduces a slightly less euphoric possibility: maybe the buildout is getting ahead of itself — exactly what Michael Burry suggested was happening when he compared AI to the fiber/internet boom back in December, which I pointed out.


🔥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life: Get 50% off forever


And markets right now are not exactly in the mood for narrative disruptions.

Investors are already staring at a fairly unpleasant combination of risks. The conflict involving Iran continues to simmer with no clear path to a decisive resolution, raising the possibility of further regional escalation. Private credit — the $2 trillion corner of finance that has quietly replaced large portions of the traditional leveraged lending market — is starting to show visible signs of strain as higher rates squeeze borrowers and liquidity becomes more selective.

Overlay that with the fact that real interest rates remain positive and restrictive, meaning the cost of financing enormous infrastructure projects is no longer trivial.

Individually, none of these issues would necessarily derail markets. Together they start to look a bit like a three-headed chimera: Iran, AI capex bubble bursting and private credit vomiting up pieces of its own spleen.

For the past year markets have been happy to assume that all of this will work itself out. Now, just as investors head into a weekend already filled with nerves, one of the more exuberant pieces of the AI infrastructure narrative has quietly hit a speed bump.

And if the selling that began after that 3 PM headline is any indication, traders may spend the weekend asking an uncomfortable question: what happens if the most crowded trade in the market just developed its first real crack? You guys think about that. I’m going to happy hour.

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page hereThis post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier.

The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 11:40

U.S. Military-Industrial Complex Agrees To Quadruple Bomb Production As Operation Epic Fury Rages On

U.S. Military-Industrial Complex Agrees To Quadruple Bomb Production As Operation Epic Fury Rages On

U.S. Central Command said late Friday on X that U.S. forces struck 3,000 IRGC targets with air-delivered munitions during the first week of Operation Epic Fury, signaling that the campaign is only intensifying as it moves into next week.

President Trump wrote on Truth Social Friday that he would not accept a negotiated end to the war with Iran, suggesting the conflict could drag on for some time. “There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” he said.

We have reported that U.S. inventories of some critical munitions are running low, with U.S. forces scrambling for supplies of key air-defense interceptors as IRGC missiles and drones continue to target American and allied bases across Gulf states.

Dwindling supplies of critical munitions are being amplified by Ukraine’s continued need for interceptors amid relentless Russian missile and drone barrages, a major problem that likely prompted President Trump to host top U.S. defense manufacturers to discuss accelerating missile and bomb production.

“We just concluded a very good meeting with the largest U.S. Defense Manufacturing Companies where we discussed Production and Production Schedules,” Trump said on Truth Social late Friday afternoon.

Trump said the CEOs of BAE Systems, Boeing, Honeywell Aerospace, L3Harris Missile Solutions, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon were all in attendance and “agreed to quadruple” weapons production.

“They have agreed to quadruple Production of the ‘Exquisite Class’ Weaponry in that we want to reach, as rapidly as possible, the highest levels of quantity. Expansion began three months prior to the meeting, and the plants and Production of many of these Weapons are already underway,” the President said.

“We have agreed to quadruple critical munitions production,” LMT wrote on X shortly after the meeting.

As the conflict is set to drag on for weeks and weapons production ramps up, the Goldman Sachs index for U.S. defense firms is primed for a breakout. One reason the breakout could occur is USCENTCOM’s X post, which reads “We Are Not Slowing Down.”

Our defense pick since May 24, 2025, has been L3Harris, another defense firm that attended the meeting. Nearly a year ago, we outlined that L3Harris was a play on the “U.S. Hemispheric Defense Theme.” Since then, the stock is up more than 50%.

What is clear to traders is that the moment Trump signals Iran is prepared to surrender, defense stocks and crude are likely to plunge as war risk premiums implode.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 11:05

British Lawmaker’s Husband Arrested On Suspicion Of Spying For China

British Lawmaker’s Husband Arrested On Suspicion Of Spying For China

Weeks after China’s mega-embassy opened in London (the one that’s right next to all of their tappable communications cables), the husband of Labour Party whip Joani Reid was arrested over Chinese espionage concerns, prompting the lawmaker to step aside amid ongoing probes.

A member of the Metropolitan Police patrols the Oxford Street retail district in London on Oct. 2, 2025. Leon Neal/Getty Images

Reid’s membership in the party is now under suspension while she remains an elected lawmaker, as her husband, 39-year-old David Taylor, was one of three men arrested on Wednesday under the National Security Act. The men allegedly assisted a Chinese intelligence agency. 

In addition to Taylor, former Labour Party press officer Matthew Aplin and former Welsh government special advisor Steve Jones were identified as the other two who were arrested.  

As the Epoch Times notes further, Reid stressed that she’s not under investigation and that neither she nor her children are involved in her husband’s business activities.

“I have done nothing wrong. I ⁠love ​my country,” she said in a statement, noting she has not seen anything to make her suspect her husband has “broken any law.”

She described the suspension as voluntary.

This week ​has been ​the worst ⁠of my life,” she said.

Chinese espionage concerns have grown in the country recently, with domestic intelligence agency MI5 warning the country’s politicians that they are targets of Chinese agents. On the same day of the trio’s arrests, two other men—a Hong Kong police superintendent and a UK border official—went on trial on charges of spying on the Hong Kong diaspora in the country.

The constituency offices of Joani Reid, the Scottish Labor MP for East Kilbride and Strathaven, in East Kilbride, Scotland, on March 4, 2026. Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

Authorities on March 4 also raided the house of a veteran British journalist over the latest spying case.

The journalist, Martin Shipton, described loud banging that woke him up early in the morning.

In a piece for Nation.Cymru, a Welsh news service, Shipton recalled going on an all-expense-paid trip with Taylor to Hong Kong at Taylor’s invitation. The trip happened about three years ago and lasted around a week, funded by a Chinese think tank that advised the top Chinese leader on international relations, he said. He emphasized that he was not under arrest and that he voluntarily gave a statement to the police about the trip.

At the House of Commons chamber, UK Minister of State for Security Dan Jarvis expressed alarm over “an increasing pattern of covert activity from Chinese state-linked actors targeting UK democracy,” whether it be gathering intelligence on policymaking or active interference in governance.

British officials have raised strong concerns with their Chinese counterparts in both London and Beijing, he said.

Multiple local lawmakers took the occasion to highlight security risks they saw with plans of a new, expanded Chinese embassy that their government greenlit in January.

“The Chinese only represent strength, and for them everything is transactional,” Conservative lawmaker Edward Leigh said.

He called on the UK authorities to summon the Chinese ambassador over the “intolerable” actions.

You cannot build this mega-embassy in just about the most sensitive site in London while you behave like this,” he said.

In the United States, Chairman of the House Select Committee on the CCP Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.) echoed the view.

He noted another Chinese spy trial in London last fall, which collapsed before it began because the government failed to provide evidence that China represents a national security threat.

“The British government’s failure to properly prosecute alleged spies last fall, coupled with its approval of China’s mega embassy, only emboldens the CCP’s espionage activities in the UK,” Moolenaar said.

He urged the UK to rescind the Chinese mega embassy approval and prosecute the cases thoroughly.

As one of our closest security partners with access to American intelligence on China, the UK’s commitment to protecting sensitive information must be beyond doubt,” he said.

Reid’s office didn’t respond to a query from The Epoch Times by publication time.

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 10:30

European Nationalists Rally Around Orbán Following Zelensky’s “Outrageous” Remarks

European Nationalists Rally Around Orbán Following Zelensky’s “Outrageous” Remarks

Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,

Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó has condemned remarks by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Budapest says amounted to a threat against Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.

Responding to comments made during a press briefing in Kyiv on Thursday, Szijjártó said the statement was “beyond every limit” and reflected what he described as “the kind of ‘culture’ coming from Kyiv.”

“This is the man Brussels admires and the country they want to fast-track into the European Union,” Szijjártó said.

“No one can threaten Hungary or its prime minister. No one can blackmail us just because we refuse to pay the price of Ukraine’s war and refuse to accept higher energy prices because of Ukraine.”

Zelensky had been speaking to compatriots about the proposed €90 billion European funding package for Ukraine, and warned that a single EU leader should not block the measure, widely interpreted as meaning Viktor Orbán.

“We hope that in the European Union, one person will not block the 90 billion [euros]. Otherwise, we will give this person’s address to the armed forces, to our guys, let them call him and talk to him in their own language,” Zelensky said.

The Patriots for Europe group in the European Parliament also criticized the comments, saying that “statements suggesting intimidation or threats of violence are incompatible with democratic principles and with the spirit of mutual respect that should guide relations between partners.”

The group noted that EU member states have already provided approximately €200 billion in support to Ukraine and said such rhetoric was difficult to reconcile with Ukraine’s ambition to join the European Union.

Tensions escalated further after Orbán responded on social media, declaring that Hungary would restore energy flows through the Druzhba oil pipeline by force, if necessary.

“There will be no deals, no compromise. We will break the Ukrainian oil blockade by force. Hungary’s energy will soon flow again through the Friendship pipeline,” Orbán wrote.

“President Zelensky’s threats are not about me. He is threatening Hungary. Unfortunately for him, he cannot stop me from protecting Hungarian families,” he added.

Several Members of the European Parliament stood in support of Hungary following the remarks.

“Let me remind you that Hungary decided to take this step not out of some whim or bad mood, but in response to Ukraine halting the transit of oil to Hungary via the Druzhba pipeline,” noted Polish MEP Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, affiliated with the right-wing Confederation. “Because of this, fuel prices in Hungary have risen, and Prime Minister Orbán is simply standing firm in defense of his citizens.”

“Not another euro for Zelensky and his corrupt gang! We stand with Hungary,” added Austrian Freedom Party MEP Harald Vilimsky.

“Zelensky has long been making a mistake by allowing himself to be used by the European Union to cooperate with Von der Leyen and the Brussels troop in the massive interference in the Hungarian election campaign,” added Spain’s Vox MEP Hermann Tertsch. “It’s very likely that their plan will backfire.”

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico also weighed in late on Thursday. In a video posted on social media, Fico expressed “full solidarity” with his Hungarian counterpart, and intimated that “if the Ukrainian president continues like this, it may be that other EU member states will also block the €90 billion loan.”

He further urged key members of the European Commission and European Parliament to “distance themselves” from what he called Zelensky’s “outrageous blackmailing statements.”

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/07/2026 – 09:55