Authored by Russ Jones via The Epoch Times,

The Democratic Socialists of America’s national leadership was split 14-13 in Chicago this summer. Not over whether to endorse Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) for president in 2028, but over whether the group’s own 120,000 members should even get to vote on the question.

The narrow margin, which blocked a nonbinding member poll, landed in the same season the DSA became, by its own count, the largest socialist organization in American history. It also exposed a fault line that the organization’s recent winning streak has mostly obscured. The DSA has not settled on what it wants to be.

Ocasio-Cortez has kept the door open for a potential run for White House. Asked on ABC’s “This Week” this month whether she would run for president or Senate in 2028, she said, “I haven’t ruled out the possibility, and I’m very humbled [by] the tremendous amount of support out there.” That leaves the DSA debating an endorsement for a candidacy she has neither confirmed nor denied.

The DSA was formed in 1982 through a merger of two earlier socialist organizations and describes its mission as replacing capitalism with democratic socialism, an economic system in which workers, not private owners, control production and resources. Its platform, called “Workers Deserve More,” calls for Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, universal rent control, and an end to mass incarceration.

Some of the DSA’s positions have drawn particular scrutiny. The group’s platform calls for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and scaling back its deportation efforts, and its “defund the police” plank goes further, calling for eventually eliminating police and prisons altogether.

Within the Party

Frank Llewellyn, the DSA’s national director from 2001 to 2011, told The Epoch Times the organization has no interest in becoming a third party, regardless of how the endorsement debate is resolved. Llewellyn is also treasurer for Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional campaign, a role he’s held since 2018. He said he was speaking in a personal capacity, not on her behalf.

“All the success DSA has had is within the Democratic system,” Llewellyn said. “We don’t really want a third party. It’s a complicated topic, but we are committed to this path, even though there are those who would disagree.”

Llewellyn attributed the movement’s momentum to shifting economic conditions rather than any single tactic.

“The conditions are driving the success,” he said, including “where power lies, changes in the economy, and running people who have that perspective and convincing people they will do their best to make those changes.” Voters, he said, simply “see the economy is not working for them.”

He also pointed to generational turnover inside the party.

“There’s generational change going on,” Llewellyn said. “Being around a long time is no longer an advantage.“

He was careful not to predict whether the DSA will ultimately back Ocasio-Cortez.

“AOC is a formidable candidate with strong support,” Llewellyn said. “I’m sure her future political aspirations will become more defined in due time.”

Miriam Bensman, a longtime DSA member in Queens who has organized for the group since the 1980s, told The Epoch Times that staying inside the Democratic Party was a founding principle, not a recent compromise. She traced the debate back to the Socialist Party in the 1960s, before the DSA’s 1982 founding, and recalled a New York City Council candidate, Jabari Brisport, who ran on the Green Party and Socialist Party lines and lost, then won a state Senate seat two years later running as a Democrat.

“Overcoming people’s loyalty to voting as Democrats was really hard,” Bensman said. “People had to learn it for themselves.”

Bensman acknowledged that running under the Green Party banner and only gaining 2 percent of the vote wasn’t worth the time or the expense.

Bensman, who volunteered for Zohran Mamdani’s New York City mayoral campaign, a state Assembly primary, and congressional campaigns in Michigan this year, also said the DSA’s momentum reflects economic conditions. She spent much of this year knocking on doors for Assembly candidate David Orkin, who defeated an incumbent in a Queens Democratic primary, and for Rep. Claire Valdez in an overlapping congressional district.

“The inequality of wealth and income has gotten so extreme over the last almost 50 years,” she said, pointing to tax cuts dating to President Ronald Reagan’s administration, weakened unions, and rising rents. “People are rightfully angry.”

She said the DSA sometimes works alongside the Working Families Party, which backs candidates who are not DSA members, including Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan. Bensman said she also campaigned this year for Donavan McKinney, a DSA-backed congressional candidate in Michigan.

Bensman’s support for the DSA is rooted in ideology, not just electoral tactics.

She said she is “moved by the ideals of democratic socialism,” arguing that people can’t live dignified lives amid extreme inequality and that democracy itself is compromised when government is shaped by corporate interests and concentrated wealth.

Bensman pointed to healthcare specifically, saying people “shouldn’t have to worry about not being able to eat in order to take care of their healthcare,” and compared it to services Americans already take for granted, like public schools, libraries, and toll-free roads.

“Even when we can’t get all of that,” she said, the DSA’s platform still “reshapes how we design public programs.”

This involves a belief, she said, that “government can help make life better.”

Establishment Democrats

State Sen. Michael Gianaris (D-N.Y.) told NY1’s Errol Louis that establishment Democrats should not try to block democratic socialist candidates following their recent wins.

“I keep trying to make this point to people who are anti-DSA or whatever it is. You’re not opposing these individuals who are running for office. You are opposing thousands of people who vote for them,” Gianaris said.

Llewellyn made a similar case in blunter terms, arguing that keeping the party’s current coalition intact is not the point.

“Those who can’t get on board with the DSA agenda need to leave and find another home,” Llewellyn said. “The Democratic corporate money people are at odds with DSA.”

That framing puts Llewellyn well to the left of Gianaris, who argues for coexistence rather than a clean break. Where Gianaris describes the DSA’s rise as an expansion of the Democratic coalition, Llewellyn frames it as a takeover already underway, one in which the party’s older, more moderate wing is expected to adapt or leave rather than the other way around.

The result is a party weighing two different versions of what “making room” for the DSA actually requires. A coalition broad enough to include democratic socialists, or one that eventually replaces its old guard with them.

Party Split

Not everyone views the DSA’s rise as a sign of durable strength. Ralph Rebandt, a Michigan pastor of 30 years who ran for governor there, told The Epoch Times the party’s leftward shift will cost Democrats votes in November. That kind of accommodation from elected Democrats, he said, is exactly what worries him: a party absorbing a movement it may not be able to control.

Rebandt pointed to Abdul El-Sayed’s Senate primary win in Michigan, which relied heavily on college towns, while Democratic voters in Detroit and other working-class areas favored Rep. Haley Stevens.

“There’s a huge split right now in the party,” Rebandt said. “The Democrats we’re talking to and working with in Detroit are telling us they don’t want anything to do with socialism or communism.”

Rebandt predicts El-Sayed will lose to Republican Mike Rogers in the general election. He also said he expects Generation Z voters, not older Democrats, to ultimately reject the socialist label.

“They know what socialism does. They know what socialism brings, and they don’t want that,” Rebandt said. “They want to be able to live the American dream.”

Asked whether the DSA intends to remain inside the Democratic Party or eventually break away, Rebandt predicted the opposite of a third-party strategy.

“At some point when they feel they’re large enough to take over the Democratic Party, they’re going to be the Democratic Party,” he said. “I don’t think they would do a third option.”

That prediction lines up with what Llewellyn and Bensman describe as DSA’s actual strategy. Growth through Democratic primaries, not a break from the party. Llewellyn pointed to a historical precedent he believes the DSA is emulating.

“The Republicans replaced the Whigs,” he said. “They were a third party.”

Whether that comparison holds may depend on what the DSA decides to do about Ocasio-Cortez. For now, the narrow vote in Chicago suggests the organization itself has not resolved the question, even as its membership and its influence within the Democratic Party continue to grow.

“People are afraid to argue with us because we are finding success,” Llewellyn said.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Tuesday new sanctions against International Criminal Court President Tomoko Akane and Senior Trial Lawyer Abdoulaye Seye as tensions flare between the court and the Trump administration.

“These individuals have directly engaged in efforts by the ICC to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute officials whose government has not consented to ICC jurisdiction,” his statement said.

The ICC, he added, has attempted to “assert authority over” over U.S. citizens and nationals of other nations that have not consented to the Rome Statute that set up the court.

The United States is not a party to the ICC.

“Our whole of government campaign to dismantle the threat posed by the ICC to national sovereignty will be sweeping and we expect more countries to join our campaign by ending their funding and participation in this politicized and unaccountable court,” Rubio said, suggesting that “additional measures” may be taken against the Hague, Netherlands-based body.

As Jack Phillips reports for The Epoch Times, the sanctions against Akane and Seye were issued ​under a Trump executive order last year authorizing sanctions against the court, according to Rubio.

In July, Rubio said that the Trump administration would seek to dismantle the ICC by using visa revocations, sanctions, the targeting of individuals, and diplomatic pressure on countries to withdraw from the body.

“The American people never agreed to any of this, and they never will,” Rubio said last month.

“Read the words of our Declaration of Independence. We fought a revolution against a foreign power, transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses. Independence is our birthright. We will never let foreign bureaucrats take that away from us.”

The court, which was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute, has been adopted by more than 120 countries. Countries that do not recognize the court’s authority include the United States, China, Russia, Israel, India, Saudi Arabia, and more.

However, the ICC has argued that the Rome Statute ​gives the court power to prosecute war crimes committed on the territory of member states by nationals of non-member states.

The Trump administration imposed targeted sanctions last year on several ICC officials such as prosecutors and judges, citing the ICC’s 2024 decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime ​Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant over what the court alleged were improper actions carried out by the Israeli government during its war in Gaza.

Earlier this year, three sitting ICC judges sued Trump and his administration over the sanctions, arguing that they were unlawful.

And earlier this month, multiple human rights groups sued the administration over the sanctions, describing the actions and Trump administration order as unconstitutional.

“The plaintiffs are seeking an end to this sanctions regime, which transgresses the president’s authority and violates international and U.S. law, including the rights to freedom of expression and religion,” said lead counsel Andrew Loewenstein in a statement carried by Human Rights Watch, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

The ICC did not immediately respond to an Epoch Times request for comment.

Authored by Troy Myers via The Epoch Times,

Joslyne Baird has been looking for a job for about a year to help her family pay the bills.

She began her job search at 14 years old, applying to summer camps and grocery stores around her small Kentucky town of about 1,500 people, without success, she told The Epoch Times.

“I’m looking for babysitting jobs, mowing jobs, cleaning jobs, and so much more,” the now 15-year-old said. “Anything I’m able to do to make money for, I will do.”

Baird has not heard back from a single employer to which she submitted applications, she said.

What the Kentucky teenager is experiencing is a continuation of a trend that began in 2025: a worsening job market for American teens looking for summer work.

Experts accurately predicted last summer to be the toughest on record, and forecasted this one to be even worse, which some teenagers feel is true.

Whether it’s waiting tables, bagging groceries, or stocking shelves, a summer job is one of many rites of passage into adulthood as kids seek more responsibility, less parental oversight, and their own money to spend, but experts say these roles typically filled by teens are fading.

However, there still exists a path to making money, some teenagers told The Epoch Times, even if it means becoming your own boss.

Job Search Struggles

Baird is one of 12 siblings and described herself as patient, caring, responsible, and mature – all attributes a hiring manager would look for in a teenage employee.

“I have not heard back from anybody,” Baird said. “I want a job because my family has been struggling a lot with money, and I would really like to help them.”

She has applied to many jobs over the course of about a year but to no avail.

Younger teenagers between the ages of 13 and 15 are more limited in their options due to the complexity of arranging transportation to get to work.

“Now that I’m 15, I’m hoping that people are willing to hire me since I’m older,” Baird said. “I’m very hopeful on my job search.”

Even older teenagers who are able to drive on their own described similar struggles.

Olivia Watson, 18, is going into her senior year in high school and looking for a part-time job.

She’s heard back from a few employers and participated in some interviews but has not yet landed a position.

“Most employers are looking for employees with experience, which makes it difficult for young adults like me to find work,” Watson, of Calhoun, Louisiana, said. “But also, most young adults are less motivated than others, so employers don’t take young adults seriously, especially where I’m from.”

Like Baird, Watson has applied for many jobs, including at local businesses, bakeries, retail stores, and restaurants, and she has applied for some customer service roles.

The Louisiana-based teen said she’s been searching for a job for about a month, spending ample amounts of time filling out applications and following up with employers to try to make herself stand out as a candidate.

“Even though it’s been challenging, I believe that if I keep applying, working hard, and staying positive, I’ll eventually find a job that’s a good fit for me,” Watson said.

Watson said she wants to earn her own money to save for her future, help pay her own expenses, gain experience to prepare for adulthood, and ultimately become more independent.

Asked about whether she believed expert predictions about this summer becoming the worst on record for the teenage job market, she said she and many friends, who are also looking for similar jobs, are finding this to be true.

“Some have found jobs, but many are having the same experience I am – submitting lots of applications without hearing back or waiting a long time for interviews,” Watson said. “It seems like finding a job has become much more competitive than many of us expected.”

Job Search Success

Amid a worsening job market for teens, some are tapping into their entrepreneurial side to make money.

Tyler Brock was born and raised in rural Duplin County, North Carolina. He began working at 10 years old for a farmer up the road because he wanted gas money for his four-wheeler and to go bowling with friends.

“At that point in time, I was still doing stuff like that,” Brock said. “But when I started my company, I [had] a one-track mind, and it was ‘let’s see how hard we can work and how much we can accomplish.'”

Eight years later, Brock is the owner of Tyler’s Lawn Care, which services about 80 properties, and is a partial owner with his father in a trucking business.

Brock also recently bought a hog farm.

“I’ve always loved working, and that’s something my dad has always instilled in me – hard work and dedication,” Brock told The Epoch Times. “There’s no time to complain.”

Brock’s hog farm is capable of holding up to 2,600 hogs, and he is partnered with Smithfield Foods, a food-processing company in Virginia.

The company owns the pigs and gives them to Brock when they’re about 13 pounds. He cares for them until they’re anywhere from 45 to 270 pounds, at which point they’re ready to be taken to a processing facility.

He described all business ventures as a “dream” and a “blessing.”

“I would get up, go to school, go to football practice, or whatever sport we were in, I’d leave there, and I’d go work,” Brock said. “I can’t stand sitting still, and most of the people my age, they like to game – I don’t know how to run an Xbox controller.”

Eventually, Brock said he quit sports to pursue work.

There were times he considered giving up and struggled with work, but there also have been moments of wild success and deep fulfillment, he said.

Jay Edouard, a 19-year-old from Long Island, New York, has a similar entrepreneurial spirit.

He told The Epoch Times his first job, technically, was selling candy to classmates in middle school. Edouard wanted to make money because he felt regretful asking his parents for some while growing up. He also said he wanted to buy new Jordan sneakers.

“I thought it would be easier, better for me to make my own money, so they can’t tell me no,” Edouard said. “My dad, even my mom, they loved that at a young age I just started to make my own money or at least try.”

Once he entered high school, Edouard found work in landscaping businesses and shoveling snow. He and his friends used to enjoy the snow and play in it until they found out they could make money from it, Edouard said.

Eventually, he signed up for MyTeenGig, a website that connects teenagers to homeowners who will pay them to complete a chore around their home.

“They have all sorts of things on there,” Edouard said. “Regular yard work, or even, at one time, we had to move a hot tub.”

Read the rest here…

Dear Comcast customers: The internet gateway in your living room is now a motion sensor. It’s free of charge, and the data can go to law enforcement without further notice. What’s more, researchers have already shown that these same signals can identify exactly who is in the room.

On Tuesday, Comcast unveiled Xfinity Shield, a home security platform built entirely around the WiFi network. Its centerpiece, WiFi Motion, turns the leased gateway into a motion detector at no extra charge. According to Comcast, a typical customer has roughly 36 devices connected to their WiFi.

WiFi Motion works because a human body moving through a room disturbs the signal field between the gateway and stationary connected devices, like a printer or a game console. While the feature is opt-in and – according to Comcast’s rollout materials – does not track phones or reach through WiFi extenders, those limitations are choices Comcast made in software, not limitations of the technology itself.

Comcast says WiFi Motion works “without recording video, capturing images or identifying individuals.”

The company is not shy about identification as a product. The $15-a-month tier, Xfinity Shield Select, adds AI-powered cameras that identify people, pets, packages and vehicles. The free tier’s restraint is a line drawn one product SKU away.

The company’s own terms spell out where the data can go. According to the fine print that drew criticism when the feature first appeared last year, Comcast “may disclose information generated by your WiFi Motion to third parties without further notice” in connection with law enforcement investigations. Users pointed out at the time that the only complete opt-out is returning the Xfinity router.

The true capabilities of this technology were laid out by researchers at Germany’s Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in findings presented last November at the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security in Taipei. Using nothing but the traffic from an ordinary WiFi network, their system identified people with 99.5 percent accuracy in a study of 197 participants, regardless of viewing angle or how the person walked.

The method exploits beamforming feedback information (BFI) – housekeeping signals that every connected device sends back to the router so it can aim its transmissions efficiently. Beamforming has shipped with consumer WiFi hardware since WiFi 5. Because this feedback travels unencrypted, anyone within radio range can read it and, using a trained model, convert it into a crude radio image of whoever is present.

The person being identified does not need to be carrying a device at all; it is enough that other people’s nearby phones and laptops are talking to the router. “This technology turns every router into a potential means for surveillance,” KIT’s Julian Todt warned. He described a scenario in which someone who regularly walks past a café running a WiFi network could be recognized there later – by authorities or companies – without ever knowing it happened.

One limitation provides a reality check: the system works only after it has been trained on a person’s radio signature. The 99.5 percent accuracy figure applies to re-identifying enrolled participants, not identifying a stranger cold. The attack succeeds when it can say ‘the person recorded here is the person recorded earlier’. So this limitation disappears once anyone with sufficient reach starts collecting signatures at scale.

The standards process has already moved past the warning stage. In 2025, the IEEE ratified 802.11bf, an amendment that deliberately builds sensing capabilities into WiFi – such as presence detection, fall detection, and breathing monitoring – and early implementations are already appearing in silicon. While the KIT team is urging for privacy safeguards in that new standard, the technique they demonstrated needs none of it: it runs entirely on beamforming features that have been deployed in consumer routers for over a decade.

The researchers tested mitigations. Cutting the frequency of beamforming reports barely dented accuracy even at heavily degraded sample rates, and encrypting the feedback would require rewriting the WiFi standard and breaking backward compatibility with billions of deployed devices.

Meanwhile, the visible surveillance layer is in open retreat in America. Flock Safety, the license plate reader network that became the flashpoint of this year’s anti-surveillance backlash, spent last week announcing guardrails – cutting default data retention from 30 days to seven, and instituting automatic lockouts for abnormal searches. The company’s own justification undercuts the gesture: Flock says more than 90 percent of searches are completed within a week anyway. This comes after a summer of reports of misuse, more than 50 agencies and jurisdictions walking away from contracts since January, and people in multiple states destroying the cameras outright. The ACLU called the changes a “thinly veiled PR attempt” built on “largely hollow security promises.”

A camera is at least a visible object: it sits on a pole, neighbors notice it, city councils vote on it, and when enough people get angry, it comes down. Flock needed a decade and roughly 120,000 cameras to cover American roads. The WiFi build-out was finished years ago – one living room, café, and office at a time – and there is nothing on a pole to point at.

Summary

• No talks: Trump confirms US-Iran negotiations are off, vows to ‘strangle them’ over time.
• Hormuz attack: Tanker hit, injuring a crew member.
• Houthis escalate: Attacks shut Yemen’s Mokha port.
• Diplomacy stalled: Qatar says not mediating until Oman-Hormuz deal finalized.
• Iran hardens: Tehran says it maintains an offensive posture.

*  *  *

Disengagement: Trump Vows New Strategy of Strangling Iran

The US administration has already said this many times and in many different ways. We suppose President Trump wants the world to know that talks with Iran are really really over this time, and the gloves are coming off (again):

US President Trump told top administration envoys to halt their conversations with Iran, according to CNN citing a US official

“White House officials have recently communicated to political allies that they are shifting their strategy — going from “hammer Iran ASAP” to “strangle them” over time.

While there have been no new bombs away just yet, the statement comes after earlier in the day the UAE government reported a rare instance of a pair of alleged Iranian missiles inbound in its territory. Iran subsequently denied that it was behind any attack. Earlier in the summer Kuwait and Bahrain were targets of frequent attacks, but the UAE was largely spared in the most recent salvos.

Trump is now not pursuing to revive talks at all, it appears, and this is being dubbed as a new ‘disengagement’ strategy. According to more from CNN: “And instead of claiming talks were proceeding well, and that a new deal was just around the corner — as he’s asserted repeatedly since the ceasefire signed in June fell apart — Trump announced there was no diplomacy underway whatsoever.”

So this could finally mark the end of the fake and premature ‘deal imminent’ headlines which not infrequently marked earlier phases of the war.

UAE Under Missile Alert

While initial details and the precise nature of the threat remain unclear, the UAE has said it detected a missile threat targeting the country. “UAE air defense systems detected a missile threat targeting the county,” the National Emergency Crisis and Disaster Management Authority said in a post on X. This has included Dubai residents receiving a UAE missile threat alert.

The country has not actually been targeted much by Iran throughout the war. The UAE has in follow-up said the situation is currently “safe” after the missile threat. Air-defenses detected two inbound:

UAE Defense Ministry said it detected two ballistic missiles launched from Iran, one missile fell outside territorial waters, second fell inside.

Trump Confirms ‘No Talks’ – Says Hormuz ‘Open & Operating’; Oil Slides

President Trump issued a new Truth Social post, within hours after posting a map depicting the Strait of Hormuz as a ‘new US territory’. He affirmed there are currently no talks or conversations happening with the Iranians – nor is there so much as anything scheduled. However, he claimed the strait is “open and operating” – with water minds having been “removed or detonated”.

A White House official tells me that Trump’s Truth Social post below is him calling off talks with Iran for the foreseeable future ⬇️ https://t.co/6dIvne1LqU

— Shelby Talcott (@ShelbyTalcott) August 18, 2026

Perhaps as intended, oil reacted to the claim of an ‘open’ and supposedly mine-free Strait of Hormuz, sliding on the statement…

Iranian Attack on Outbound Tanker in Hormuz

Yet another attack has occurred in the Strait of Hormuz, this time on a foreign tanker on an outbound transit route, which Iran and Oman claim to directly oversee and administer according to the terms of the Oman deal for managing the strait which is still being finalized.

UK Maritime Trade Operations says Tuesday that the unknown projectile caused engine-room damage and a crew casualty, with the remaining crew being rescued and assisted by the Omani Coast Guard.

Such attacks which mark enforcement of Iran’s protocol and claim of control over the vital energy transit waterway have been steady, though not rapid, over the last several weeks. Oil prices have been on the rise this week, also as it continues to be clear that Washington and Tehran are digging in with their competing maximum demands.

Houthis Escalate in Red Sea

Hormuz isn’t the only chokepoint still witnessing active conflict. Waters off Yemen and the Red Sea also continue to heat up, with the Iranian-allied Houthi rebels still escalating.

According to The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, the group is “shutting down operations at a strategic seaport and pushing closer to the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, an important global shipping chokepoint.”

The report cites Yemeni authorities to describe, “The militant group’s recent missile and drone attacks forced the closure of the port of Mokha, a key logistics hub for civilian shipping and for anti-Houthi forces operating along the coast.”

According to more on the significance:

“This is the most significant escalation in quite a few years, maybe since 2020,” said Adam Baron, a Yemen expert and fellow with New America, a policy institute in Washington.

Baron called the port of Mokha the key logistics hub for anti-Houthi forces on the Red Sea. The Houthis control mountainous terrain inland from the Bab al-Mandeb but not the coast along the crucial waterway, which is held by opposing forces. 

No Movement on Talks until After Oman Deal Signed: Qatar

On the question of finding a path toward broader US-Iran peace, there’s still no movements on talks. Qatar is even openly saying that its direct mediation efforts won’t resume until the Oman deal is finalized – which critics have complained gives Iran de facto control of operations in the Strait of Hormuz.

“Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari says during a news conference that countries mediating between Iran and the US are waiting for Iran and Oman to announce an expected agreement on transit through the Strait of Hormuz, before pushing Washington and Tehran to resume negotiations aimed at ending their war,” Al Jazeera reports.

President Trump’s latest rhetoric and social media activity is not going to help the cause of peace, or the two sides getting back to the negotiating table. After verbalizing Monday that the US should declare the Hormuz Strait a US territory, he posted the following to Truth Social on Tuesday:

All of this comes on the heels of the 60-day diplomatic window set by the MoU inked in June has expired. Tehran said it was already effectively dead anyway, and thus “irrelevant” – blaming Washington for having violated its terms on multiple occasions.

Rough Road to November

Trump is meanwhile ultimately sticking to the following as an ultimate goal of the Iran conflict: “The number one Goal is, and always will be, that Iran cannot have, in any way, shape, or form, a Nuclear Weapon. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP,” he earlier stated on Truth Social.

The path to midterm elections in November continues to be a rough one for the US administration, and the pain is likely to continue for at least the time being…

President Donald Trump’s approval rating fell to the lowest level of his presidency, ‌with an overwhelming majority of Americans concerned the US war with Iran will last a long time, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll https://t.co/364a3rlckM pic.twitter.com/UrDCYmf8m0

— Reuters (@Reuters) August 18, 2026

Not only has Iran not backed down, but its military is newly claiming to take an “offensive” posture and has reshuffled its command accordingly. If there are new tit-for-tat attacks, Tehran is in essence saying the next salvo will go bigger.

By Tsvetana Paraskova of OilPrice.com

China is estimated to have added about 200,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil to its huge inventories in July as imports rebounded from a decade-low in June and refinery runs remained depressed.

The world’s top crude oil importer, unlike other major oil consumers, started drawing down on stockpiles only in May, the third month of the Middle East crisis, as it had amassed an estimated 1.4 billion barrels of crude oil in commercial and strategic stocks at the start of the Iran war.

The trend of drawdowns in May and June appears to have reversed in July, according to calculations by Reuters columnist Clyde Russell based on officially available Chinese data.

Unlike the United States, China does not report inventories. Analysts are looking at overall supply (domestic production plus imports) and refinery processing rates to estimate how much crude is going into reserves and how much is being processed into fuels.

Using this calculation, Reuters’ Russell has estimated that China had 210,000 bpd of crude available to go to storage in July, considering total crude availability of 12.72 million bpd (8.41 million bpd of imports and 4.3 million bpd of domestic production), and refinery throughput of 12.51 million bpd.

The latest estimates show that China’s massive crude oil stockpile has mostly remained intact at about 1.2 billion barrels, five months after the worst disruption to global oil supply began with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

China slashed its overall crude oil imports amid the Middle East conflict as its refiners cut run rates and authorities restricted fuel exports to protect domestic supply.

Now China has eased some of the fuel export restrictions, which led to a rebound in crude oil imports in July, following a ten-year low seen in June.

The higher crude oil imports in July likely allowed stockpiling again, in a surprise to the market and possibly indicating continued weakness in domestic demand and refining volumes.

A radical Democratic Socialist lawmaker from New York is under fire after declaring that theft driven by “biological need” shouldn’t be treated as a crime, effectively green-lighting shoplifting while slamming big retailers.

Emily Gallagher, a New York State Assembly member and part of the Democratic Socialists of America’s New York State Socialists in Office caucus, sparked outrage this week with comments defending petty theft at a press conference outside Manhattan Criminal Court.

“Most of what we saw were crimes of poverty – people who are stealing things like toothpaste, people who were stealing things like, you know, soap. And that means if you’re stealing those things, you need them. And we are choosing to protect billion-dollar companies, like CVS and Walgreens, over the people who are struggling to get by,” Gallagher said, according to the New York Post.

“So I would say that the true crime is that there is such incredible wealth disparity in this city that there are people who can be thrown in jail simply for having a biological need.“

Gallagher went on to tout her soft-on-crime criminal justice “reforms” while blasting conservative media for opposing the anti-law-and-order policies that have already wreaked havoc on New York City and other Democrat-run cities across the country.

However, everyday New Yorkers aren’t buying it.

The Post quizzed several shoppers at the Food Universal supermarket in the Bronx’s Co-op City, who told the paper that Gallagher’s comments were downright ridiculous.

“It’s foolish to think one should not be punished for stealing. It is a crime,” said one shopper. “Mamdani can implement that in his [city-run grocery] stores, so if you don’t have the necessities, you can go there and get them for free,”

“People are going to feel entitled because they know they can walk in and walk out and nothing will happen,” said another shopper. “Allowing people to shoplift with no consequence is wrong. I’m a single mom and at one time I had four jobs. I would never think of stealing anything.

Anyone still dismissing the DSA as a fringe outfit with no real pull inside the Democrat Party need only look at the growing roster of newly elected socialists popping up nationwide, some already eyeing Congress. DSA-backed candidates toppled 15-term Rep. Diana DeGette in Denver and Rep. Shri Thanedar in Michigan this summer, and captured two safe blue New York House seats outright. Socialists Claire Valdez, Darializa Avila Chevalier, Melat Kiros and Donavan McKinney are now on track to join Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib in Washington come January. Over the weekend, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries even admitted the group is part of the party’s “broad caucus.”

Good luck with that.

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

A 26-year-old Ghanaian migrant stalked and attacked women across Oklahoma City over a two-week span in August, getting arrested three times for sexual battery before firefighters witnessed him trying to rape a fourth woman on a public trail and held him for police.

Jeff Kufi (Kofi) Asare was booked on a first-degree rape charge with a $75,000 bond. The Oklahoma County District Attorney’s office is pushing to raise that bond because of the rapid series of alleged assaults.

Court records show at least 19 criminal felony and misdemeanor charges filed against him since August 2023, with more than 20 arrests stretching back to 2022 for larceny, trespass, obstruction, injuring an officer, and breaking and entering.

?DEAR GOD!!!

A migrant from Ghana HUNTED women on the streets of Oklahoma City.

He attacked one. They let him go.
He attacked another. They let him go AGAIN.

Then he tried to R*PE a third woman in BROAD DAYLIGHT, and FIREFIGHTERS tackled him off of her.

He’s been arrested… pic.twitter.com/R4Y6Wmmr8M

— Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) August 17, 2026

Why is this guy still in the country?

Jeff Kofi Asare was arrested THREE times in just the past two weeks for allegedly r*ping women in Oklahoma. Nearly 2 dozen arrests since 2022.

WE SHOULDN’T HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS pic.twitter.com/PVSIEcB0Ai

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 16, 2026

On August 1 near Northwest 23rd Street and Classen Boulevard, police responded to a possible rape. Asare allegedly pushed a woman against a bus stop window and put his hands down her pants.

The same day a second woman reported he came up behind her on Classen Boulevard, pulled her pants down, and fled when she pushed him away. He was arrested for sexual battery and indecent exposure.

Five days later near Scissortail Park, Asare allegedly walked up behind another woman, grabbed her buttocks multiple times, and began digging in his pants. When she told him to leave he walked away. Police later spotted and arrested him again for sexual battery.

On August 12 on the Lake Hefner Trail, Asare allegedly approached a woman from behind, pulled her down, and attempted to rape her. Local firefighters saw the attack, intervened, and called police. He was arrested on the first-degree rape charge.

Kufi Asare is a migrant in Oklahoma. Here is his criminal record so far:

8/12/26: Rape (1st degree)
8/6/26: Sexual battery in a park
8/1/26: Sexual battery in a park
3/5/26: Breaking and entering
10/3/25: Breaking and entering
2/23/25: Trespass + obstruction
8/27/23: Retail… pic.twitter.com/uOfUK3hNuo

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) August 16, 2026

Judges just kept releasing him.

Asare had previously been released through the TEEM pretrial program by Oklahoma County District Court Judge Cindy Truong after earlier cases. Court records indicate he received an official immigration warning in April after pleading no contest to breaking and entering.

Social media reports have described him as a migrant who is not a U.S. citizen, though ICE has not yet confirmed his immigration status.

Open borders and soft-on-crime judges create the conditions for so many cases like this. When officials treat deportation as optional and pretrial release as the default for serial offenders, the result is predictable. American women end up hunted on sidewalks, in parks, and on trails in the middle of the day.

Policies that enforce immigration law and keep dangerous scumbags locked up, or better still removed, are the only real answer. Judges who keep releasing repeat predators must face accountability. The public should not have to rely on firefighters to prevent rapes.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

Splitting the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine into separate shots could take up to a decade, according to one of the two companies that produce the vaccine for the U.S. market.

“Even under current expedited review pathways, it could take years – potentially as many as 10 – to meet the safety and efficacy requirements to obtain FDA approval and then begin manufacturing and commercialization” of single-disease shots, Merck said in a statement.

Merck, which did not respond to a request for more details, had told Politifact in 2025 – after President Donald Trump floated splitting the MMR vaccine – that it could take more than 10 years to separate the components into three separate vaccines.

Trump said in an Aug. 10 order that he was issuing “gold standard childhood vaccine recommendations,” which “recognize that the combined measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine should be administered in three separate single-disease shots once such products are domestically available.” The order directed agencies to take steps to advance the recommendations.

Before signing the order, Trump said, “You have the MMR, we want it in three separate vaccinations given at separate times. Together there could be a possibility they are quite lethal and separately, it looks like they are not at all lethal but just very effective.” The White House did not respond to a request for citations by the time of publication.

Dr. Robert Malone, a former member of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory panel, said in an Aug. 10 post on X that splitting combination vaccines into separate shots could reduce adverse events without sacrificing protection.

The CDC’s website says, “No published scientific evidence shows any benefit in separating the combination MMR vaccine into three individual shots.” A January update to the childhood vaccine schedule retained recommendations for MMR vaccination, advising that children receive one dose around the age of 1 and a second dose from 4 to 6 years of age.

The MMR vaccine has been available since the 1970s. Merck and GlaxoSmithKline produce it for the United States.

Standalone vaccines were discontinued in the United States in 2008. Merck said in a 2009 letter to health care providers that it was moving forward with the MMR and not the monovalent vaccines because the combination shot “eliminates the need for 3 separate injections and reduces the chance of delays in helping protect against any of these potentially serious diseases.” The standalone vaccines are still available in certain other countries.

Side effects of the MMR vaccine include febrile seizure and severe allergic reactions, according to regulatory labels.

GlaxoSmithKline told news outlets in a statement after Trump signed the order that its vaccines “are clinically proven to provide vital protection against infectious disease, and support public health goals by reducing missed doses, improving immunization coverage, and minimizing the burden on families and healthcare systems.”

Dr. Andrew Racine, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said although it’s possible to separate the MMR vaccine into its constituent components, each component would have to be manufactured and tested.

“They wouldn’t be able to do that probably for another 10 years, and there’s no indication that they have any interest in doing that,” he said.

A White House official told reporters on a call about the order that the administration would work with the private sector to make the option of separate vaccines available to parents, relying on market-based solutions.

“Right now we have a lot of Americans and a lot of American parents who want to see additional options,” the official said.

The Food and Drug Administration did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.

Establishing and obtaining regulatory approval for the manufacturing processes for the separate shots could be time-consuming and costly, Jesse Goodman, former chief scientist at the FDA, said.

“They’d be making three times as many vials or vaccines and filling three times as many,” Goodman said. “It’s not like they have facilities sitting around idle – so they might need to either change current facilities or even create additional capacity for them.”

Reuters contributed to this report.

Already US officials have signaled they may just abandon hard-hit bases in the Middle East altogether, in the wake of Iran’s retaliation as a result of Operation Epic Fury, and a conflict that’s dragged on for nearly six months.

On Tuesday The Washington Post reviews the damage control underway, as the Pentagon ‘evaluates’ its future military footprint. All of this is framed as if Washington has a choice and full control over the matter, when it seems that all along the Trump administration was woefully underestimating what an Iranian response would look like.

“The Pentagon is evaluating its military footprint in the Middle East in an early sign of the Iran war’s potential to transform the U.S. presence in the region, according to eight people, including officials and others familiar with the matter,” Washington Post writes.

“One of the key areas the Defense Department is assessing is whether to pull back troops from the Persian Gulf, where America’s large overseas military bases have been battered by months of Iranian strikes, two people familiar with the ongoing analysis said,” it adds, further calling this a “once-in-a-generation” chance for the Pentagon to alter its presence in the region.

The whole thing is being reported as if the ‘smart people’ are in the room and in control, and also as if the US hegemon in the region didn’t already take a massive reputational hit following ‘forever wars’ and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Over 20 years after the initial invasions, the Taliban remains in firm control of Kabul and Afghanistan, and Shiite pro-Iranian politicians run Baghdad.

And now a half-year into a war where the response should have been entirely anticipated (having been predicted by years and decades of Persian Gulf war-gaming and intelligence papers), this is where things stand:

“The war really did highlight the vulnerability … of U.S. forces in the region,” said Michael Ratney, a former diplomat who served as the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia and the deputy chief of mission in Qatar.

Moving troops and equipment further west to Jordan, Israel or the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia could help alleviate some of the pressure, he argued, while noting the added distance wasn’t a “perfect solution to this problem.”

Iran has already demonstrated it can strike faraway targets in Jordan and Israel. Last month an Iranian attack on Jordan killed four U.S. service members.

Anyone with eyes to see knows that this is already happening. For months at this point, dozens of US refueling aircraft have clogged up Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion airport, for just one example.

For smarter and more legitimate analysis, one can turn to Amerikanets, which one month ago was chronicling Tehran’s successful campaign of ‘debasification’:

The broad picture of the Iranian air war in this phase has been a steady wave of concentrated missile and drone strikes sweeping its way across the region. In contrast to the previous hot phase of the war, in which Iran targeted bases across the entire theater simultaneously, this wave started with the targets close to Iranian shores, and has progressed steadily to the Israeli border. After destroying much of the radar network protecting regional US Axis bases in the previous hot phase of the war, Iranian planners have prioritized targeting fuel storage, drone hangers, refueling tankers, and barracks.

The American response has been to pull assets back ever further from Iran, to bases in Israel and Jordan. We’ll call this process debasification. Iran’s debasification strategy takes advantage of the inherent asymmetry between the vastly different force structure and capabilities of Iranian rocket forces and US Axis air forces.

A concluding section predicted the dilemma laid out in WaPo concerning a grand Pentagon evaluation of its force posture in the Middle East:

By all available evidence, the Iranian debasification campaign appears to be working. The US force in the region is likely incapable of generating the same combat power in its air operations against Iran as it could when the war started, and things are trending ever further in a negative direction. Even worse, there’s no clear solution on the horizon. The most obvious lever for American planners to pull is to accept more casualties and losses of personnel and airframes, but this is an unprecedented step the modern incarnation of the US military has never faced.

“The Iranian debasification campaign appears to be working.

The US force in the region is likely incapable of generating the same combat power in its air operations against Iran as it could when the war started, and things are trending ever further in a negative direction.…

— Alex Shams (@alexshams_) July 21, 2026

What’s worse is that the Iranians know all of this full well – and probably earlier than the Western public – and they smell blood in the water. Hence, this week they’ve been strongly signaling a new ‘offensive’ military posture, and have vowed to hit harder in whatever next waves of conflict come.

So will the US rebuild bases battered by Iranian strikes? Well, Tehran is now saying that in essence it won’t let that happen. The WaPo article operates under the illusory assumption that US planners have some big array of options set before them, when increasingly American forces are in obvious retreat and no one can do anything about it. Also, what happened to Pete Hegseth’s rah rah Epic Fury press briefings on all the ‘winning’ and chest-thumping? It’s been a while.